CLINICAL PHARMACOLOGY
Mechanism Of Action
LONSURF consists of a thymidine-based nucleoside analog, trifluridine, and the thymidine phosphorylase inhibitor, tipiracil, at a molar ratio 1:0.5 (weight ratio, 1:0.471). Inclusion of tipiracil increases trifluridine exposure by inhibiting its metabolism by thymidine phosphorylase.
Following uptake into cancer cells, trifluridine is incorporated into DNA, interferes with DNA synthesis and inhibits cell proliferation. Trifluridine/tipiracil demonstrated anti-tumor activity against KRAS wild-type and mutant human colorectal cancer xenografts in mice.
Pharmacodynamics
Cardiac Electrophysiology
LONSURF administered to 42 patients with advanced solid tumors at the recommended dosage had no large effect (i.e. >20 ms) in the mean QTc interval when compared to placebo and no exposure-QT relationship was identified. Two of 42 patients (4.8%) had QTc >500 msec and 2.4% had a QTc increase from baseline >60 msec.
Pharmacokinetics
After twice daily dosing of LONSURF, systemic exposure (AUC) of trifluridine increased more than dose-proportionally over the dose range of 15 mg/m2 (0.43 times the recommended dose) to 35 mg/m2.
The accumulation of trifluridine was 3-fold for AUC0-12hr and 2-fold for Cmax at steady state while no accumulation was observed for tipiracil.
Administration of a single dose of LONSURF 35 mg/m2 increased the mean AUC0-last of trifluridine by 37-fold and Cmax by 22-fold with reduced variability compared to administration of a single dose of trifluridine 35 mg/m2 alone.
Absorption
Following a single oral administration of LONSURF at 35 mg/m2 in patients with cancer, the mean time to peak plasma concentration (Tmax) of trifluridine was around 2 hours.
Food Effect
A standardized high-fat, high-calorie meal decreased trifluridine Cmax, tipiracil Cmax and AUC by approximately 40%, but did not change trifluridine AUC compared to those in a fasting state in patients with cancer following administration of a single dose of LONSURF 35 mg/m2.
Distribution
Trifluridine mainly binds to human serum albumin. The in vitro protein binding of trifluridine in human plasma is >96%, independent of drug concentration and presence of tipiracil. Plasma protein binding of tipiracil is below 8%.
Elimination
After administration of LONSURF 35 mg/m2, the mean elimination half-life (t1/2) of trifluridine was 1.4 hours and of tipiracil was 2.1 hours after a single dose. The mean elimination half-life at steady state of trifluridine was 2.1 hours and of tipiracil was 2.4 hours.
Metabolism
Trifluridine and tipiracil are not metabolized by cytochrome P450 (CYP) enzymes. Trifluridine is mainly eliminated by metabolism via thymidine phosphorylase to form an inactive metabolite, 5-(trifluoromethyl) uracil (FTY). No other major metabolites were detected in plasma or urine.
Excretion
After single oral administration of LONSURF (60 mg) with [14C]-trifluridine, the total cumulative excretion of radioactivity was 60% of the administered dose. The majority of recovered radioactivity was eliminated into urine (55% of the dose) as FTY and trifluridine glucuronide isomers within 24 hours and the excretion into feces and expired air was <3% for both. The unchanged trifluridine was <3% of administered dose recovered in the urine and feces.
After single oral administration of LONSURF (60 mg) with [14C]-tipiracil hydrochloride, recovered radioactivity was 77% of the dose, which consisted of 27% urinary excretion and 50% fecal excretion. Tipiracil was the major component and 6-HMU was the major metabolite in urine, and feces.
Specific Populations
Based on the population pharmacokinetic analysis, there is no clinically relevant effect of age, sex, or race (White or Asian) on the pharmacokinetics of trifluridine or tipiracil.
Patients With Renal Impairment
In RECOURSE, using the Cockcroft-Gault formula for creatinine clearance, the estimated mean AUC of trifluridine at steady state was 31% higher in patients with mild renal impairment (CLcr = 60 to 89 mL/min) and 43% higher in patients with moderate renal impairment (CLcr = 30 to 59 mL/min) than that in patient with normal renal function (CLcr ≥ 90 mL/min). The estimated mean AUC of tipiracil was 34% higher in patients with mild renal impairment and 65% higher in patients with moderate renal impairment than that in patients with normal renal function. The pharmacokinetics of trifluridine and tipiracil have not been studied in patients with severe renal impairment (CLcr < 30 mL/min) or end-stage renal disease [see Use In Specific Populations].
Patients With Hepatic Impairment
No clinically important differences in the mean exposures of trifluridine and tipiracil were observed between patients with mild hepatic impairment (total bilirubin ≤ ULN and AST > ULN or total bilirubin <1 to 1.5 times ULN and any AST) to moderate hepatic impairment (total bilirubin >1.5 to 3 times ULN and any AST) and patients with normal hepatic function (total bilirubin and AST ≤ ULN); however, 5 of 6 patients with moderate hepatic impairment experienced Grade 3 or 4 increased bilirubin levels. The pharmacokinetics of trifluridine and tipiracil have not been studied in patients with severe hepatic impairment [see Dosage Modifications, Use In Specific Populations].
Drug Interaction Studies
In vitro studies indicated that trifluridine, tipiracil, and FTY did not inhibit the CYP enzymes and had no inductive effect on CYP1A2, CYP2B6, or CYP3A4/5.
In vitro studies indicated that trifluridine was not an inhibitor of or substrate for human uptake and efflux transporters.
Clinical Studies
Metastatic Colorectal Cancer
The efficacy of LONSURF was evaluated in RECOURSE (NCT01607957), an international, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study conducted in patients with previously treated metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC). Key eligibility criteria included prior treatment with at least 2 lines of standard chemotherapy for metastatic CRC, ECOG performance status (PS) 0-1, absence of brain metastasis, and absence of ascites requiring drainage in the past four weeks. Patients were randomized 2:1 to receive LONSURF 35 mg/m2 or matching placebo orally twice daily after meals on Days 1-5 and 8-12 of each 28-day cycle until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. Randomization was stratified by KRAS status (wild-type vs. mutant), time since diagnosis of first metastasis (<18 months vs. ≥ 18 months), and region (Japan vs. US,
Europe and Australia). The major efficacy outcome measure was overall survival (OS) and an additional efficacy outcome measure was progression-free survival (PFS).
A total of 800 patients were randomized to LONSURF (N=534) with best supportive care (BSC) or matching placebo (N=266) plus BSC. The median age was 63 years, 61% were male, 58% and 35% were White and Asian respectively, and all patients had baseline ECOG PS of 0 or 1. The primary site of disease was colon (62%) or rectum (38%). KRAS status was wild-type (49%) or mutant (51%) at study entry. All patients received prior treatment with fluoropyrimidine-, oxaliplatin-, and irinotecan-based chemotherapy. All but one patient received bevacizumab and all but two patients with KRAS wild-type tumors received panitumumab or cetuximab.
Efficacy results are summarized in Table 7 and Figure 1.
Table 7: Efficacy Results from RECOURSE
|
`LONSURF (N=534) |
Placebo (N=266) |
Overall Survival |
Number of deaths, N (%) |
364 (68) |
210 (79) |
Median OS (months)a (95% CI)b |
7.1 (6.5, 7.8) |
5.3 (4.6, 6.0) |
Hazard ratio (95% CI) |
0.68 (0.58, 0.81) |
p-valuec |
<0.001 |
Progression-Free Survival |
Number of events, N (%) |
472 (88) |
251 (94) |
Hazard ratio (95% CI) |
0.47 (0.40, 0.55) |
p-valuec |
<0.001 |
aKaplan-Meier estimates
bethodology of Brookmeyer and Crowley
cStratified log-rank test (strata: KRAS status, time since diagnosis of first metastasis, region), 2-sided |
Figure 1: Kaplan-Meier Curves of Overall Survival in RECOURSE
Metastatic Gastric Cancer
The efficacy of LONSURF was evaluated in TAGS (NCT02500043), an international, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study in patients with metastatic gastric or gastroesophageal junction (GEJ) adenocarcinoma previously treated with at least 2 prior regimens for advanced disease. Previous treatments must have included a fluoropyrimidine, a platinum, and either a taxane or irinotecan. Patients with HER2/neu-positive tumors must have received prior HER2/neu-targeted therapy, if available. Adjuvant chemotherapy could be counted as one prior regimen in patients who had recurrence during or within 6 months of completion of the adjuvant chemotherapy. Other key eligibility criteria included ECOG performance status (PS) 0 or 1. Patients were randomized 2:1 to receive LONSURF 35 mg/m2 orally twice daily on Days 1-5 and 8-12 of each 28-day cycle with best supportive care (BSC) or matching placebo with BSC until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. Randomization was stratified by ECOG PS at baseline (0 vs. 1), prior ramucirumab (yes vs. no), and geographic region (Japan vs. rest of world). The major efficacy outcome measure was OS and an additional outcome measure was PFS.
A total of 507 patients were randomized to LONSURF (N=337) or placebo (N=170). The median age was 63 years, 73% were male, 70% and 16% were White and Asian respectively, and 38% had a baseline ECOG PS of 0. Seventy-one percent of patients had gastric tumors, 29% had GEJ tumors, and two patients had gastric/GEJ tumors. All patients received platinum-based chemotherapy, 99% received fluoropyrimidine-based therapy, 91% received a taxane, 55% received irinotecan, and 33% received ramucirumab. The HER2 status was negative in 62%, positive in 19%, and unknown in 20% of patients. Among the 94 patients with HER2 positive tumors, 89% received prior anti-HER2 therapy.
Efficacy results are summarized in Table 8 and Figure 2.
Table 8: Efficacy Results from TAGS
|
LONSURF
(N=534) |
Placebo
(N=266) |
Overall Survival |
Number of deaths, N (%) |
364 (68) |
210 (79) |
Median OS (months)a (95% CI)b |
7.1 (6.5, 7.8) |
5.3 (4.6, 6.0) |
Hazard ratio (95% CI) |
0.68 (0.58, 0.81) |
p-valuec |
<0.001 |
Progression-Free Survival |
Number of events, N (%) |
472 (88) |
251 (94) |
Hazard ratio (95% CI) |
0.47 (0.40, 0.55) |
p-valuec |
<0.001 |
a Kaplan-Meier estimates
b Methodology of Brookmeyer and Crowley
c Stratified log-rank test (strata: KRAS status, time since diagnosis of first metastasis, region), 2-sided |
Figure 2: Kaplan-Meier Curves of Overall Survival in TAGS