Clinical Pharmacology for Livtencity
Mechanism Of Action
LIVTENCITY is an antiviral drug against human CMV [see Microbiology].
Pharmacodynamics
Exposure-Response
In dose-ranging studies that evaluated doses of 400 mg twice daily and twice daily doses of two and three times the recommended dose, no exposure-response relationship was observed for viral load or probability of unquantifiable plasma CMV DNA.
In Phase 3 Trial 303 that evaluated a maribavir dose of 400 mg twice daily, increasing maribavir exposure was not associated with increased probability of confirmed plasma CMV DNA < LLOQ (lower limit of quantification) at Week 8.
Cardiac Electrophysiology
At three times the recommended dose (approximately twice the peak concentration observed following the recommended dose), LIVTENCITY does not prolong the QT interval to any clinically relevant extent.
Pharmacokinetics
LIVTENCITY pharmacological activity is due to the parent drug. Following oral administration, plasma maribavir exposure (Cmax and AUC) increased approximately dose-proportionally following a single dose of 50 to 1600 mg (0.125 to four times the recommended dose) and multiple doses up to 2400 mg per day (three times the recommended daily dose). Maribavir PK is time-independent. With twice-daily dosing, steady state is reached within 2 days, with mean accumulation ratios of Cmax and AUC ranging from 1.37 to 1.47.
The pharmacokinetic properties of maribavir following administration of LIVTENCITY are displayed in Table 5. The multiple-dose pharmacokinetic parameters are provided in Table 6.
Table 5: Pharmacokinetic Properties of Maribavir
| Absorptiona |
| Tmax (h), median |
1.0 to 3.0 |
| Distribution |
| Mean apparent steady-state volume of distribution (Vss, L) |
24.9 |
| % bound to human plasma proteins |
98.0 across the concentration range of 0.05-200 μg/mL |
| Blood-to plasma ratio |
1.37 |
| Elimination |
| Major route of elimination |
Hepatic metabolism |
| Half-life (tm) in transplant patients (h), mean |
4.32 |
| Oral clearance (CL/F) in transplant patients (L/h), mean |
2.67 |
| Metabolism |
| Metabolic pathwaysb |
CYP3A4 (major) and CYP1A2 (minor) |
| Excretion |
| % of dose excreted as total 14C (unchanged drug) in urinec |
61(<2) |
| % of dose excreted as total 14C (unchanged drug) in fecesc |
14 (5.7) |
a When taken orally with a high fat, high caloric meal vs fasted, the AUC0-∞ and Cmax (geometric mean ratio [90% CI] of maribavir are 0.878 [0.843, 0.915] and 0.716 [0.671, 0.764], respectively.
b In vitro studies have shown that maribavir is biotransformed into a major circulating inactive metabolite: VP 44469 (N-dealkylated metabolite), with a metabolic ratio of 0.15 -0.20. Multiple UGT enzymes, namely UGT1A1, UGT1A3, UGT2B7, and possibly UGT1A9, are involved in the glucuronidation of maribavir in humans, however, the contribution of glucuronidation to the overall clearance of maribavir is low based on in vitro data.
c Dosing in mass balance study: single-dose administration of [14C] maribavir oral solution 400 mg containing 200 nCi of total radioactivity. |
Table 6: Multiple-Dose Pharmacokinetic Parameters of Maribavir
| Geometric Mean (% CV)a |
| AUC0-taub (μg•h/mL) |
Cmax (μg/mL) |
Ctau (μg/mL) |
| 142 (48.5%) |
20.1 (35.5%) |
5.43 (85.9%) |
CV=Coefficient of Variation; Cmax=Maximum concentration; AUC0-tau=Area under the time concentration curve over a dosing interval; Ctau=Concentration at the end of a dosing interval.
a Pharmacokinetic parameter values based on post-hoc estimates from maribavir population pharmacokinetic model in transplant patients with CMV receiving 400 mg of LIVTENCITY twice daily with or without food.
b tau is maribavir dosing interval: 12 hours. |
Specific Populations
There were no clinically significant differences in the pharmacokinetics of maribavir based on age (18-79 years), gender, race (Caucasian, Black, Asian, or others), ethnicity (Hispanic/Latino or non-Hispanic/Latino), body weight (36 to 141 kg), transplant type, mild to severe renal impairment (measured creatinine clearance ranging from 12 to 70 mL/min), or mild to moderate hepatic impairment (Child-Pugh Class A or B).
Pediatric Patients
The pharmacokinetics of maribavir in patients less than 18 years of age have not been evaluated.
Using modeling and simulation, the recommended dosing regimen is expected to result in comparable steady-state plasma exposures of maribavir in patients 12 years of age and older and weighing at least 35 kg as observed in adults [see Use In Specific Populations].
Drug Interactions
Based on in vitro studies, the metabolism of maribavir is not mediated by CYP2B6, CYP2C8, CYP2C9, CYP2C19, CYP3A5, UGT1A4, UGT1A6, UGT1A10, or UGT2B15. The transport of maribavir is not mediated by organic anion transporting polypeptide (OATP)1B1, OATP1B3, or bile salt export pump (BSEP).
At clinically relevant concentrations, clinically significant interactions are not expected when LIVTENCITY is coadministered with substrates of CYP1A2, CYP2A6, CYP2B6, CYP2C8, CYP2C9, CYP2C19, CYP2E1, CYP2D6, CYP3A4; uridine diphosphate-glucuronosyltransferase (UGT)1A1, UGT1A4, UGT1A6, UGT1A9, UGT2B7; P-gp; BSEP; multidrug and toxin extrusion protein (MATE)1/2K; organic anion transporters (OAT)1 and OAT3; organic cation transporters (OCT)1 and OCT2; OATP1B1 and OATP1B3. In a clinical drug-drug interaction cocktail study, coadministration with maribavir had no effect on substrates of CYP1A2, CYP2C9, CYP2C19, CYP2D6, and CYP3A4.
Drug interaction studies were performed with LIVTENCITY and other drugs likely to be coadministered for pharmacokinetic interactions. The effects of coadministration of other drugs on the pharmacokinetics of maribavir are summarized in Table 7, and the effects of maribavir on the pharmacokinetics of coadministered drugs are summarized in Table 8.
Dosing recommendations as a result of established and other potentially significant drug-drug interactions with LIVTENCITY are provided in Table 4 [see DRUG INTERACTIONS].
Table 7: Changes in Pharmacokinetics of LIVTENCITY in the Presence of Coadministered Drugs
| Coadministered Drug and Regimen |
LIVTENCITY Regimen |
N |
Geometric Mean Ratio (90% CI) of LIVTENCITY PK with/without Coadministered Drug [No Effect=1.00] |
| AUC |
Cmax |
Ctauc |
| Anticonvulsants |
| Carbamazepinea |
400 mg once daily |
800 mg twice daily / 400 mg twice daily |
200 |
1.40
(1.09, 1.67) |
1.53
(1.22, 1.79) |
1.05
(0.71, 1.40) |
| Phenobarbitala |
100 mg once daily |
1,200 mg twice daily / 400 mg twice daily |
200 |
1.80
(1.18, 2.35) |
2.17
(1.69, 2.57) |
0.94
(0.22, 1.97) |
| Phenytoina |
300 mg once daily |
1,200 mg twice daily / 400 mg twice daily |
200 |
1.70
(1.06, 2.46) |
2.05
(1.49, 2.63) |
0.89
(0.26, 2.04) |
| Antimycobacterials |
| Rifampin |
600 mg once daily |
400 mg twice daily |
14 |
0.40
(0.36, 0.44) |
0.61
(0.52, 0.72) |
0.18
(0.14, 0.25) |
| Antifungals |
| Ketoconazole |
400 mg single dose |
400 mg single dose |
19 |
1.53
(1.44, 1.63) |
1.10
(1.01, 1.19) |
- |
| Antacids |
| Aluminum hydroxide |
20 mLb |
100 mg |
15 |
0.89 |
0.84 |
|
| and magnesium hydroxide antacid |
single dose |
single dose |
(0.83, 0.96) |
(0.75, 0.94) |
- |
a Based on physiologically based pharmacokinetic modeling results from 10 trials of 20 subjects each. The maribavir dosing regimen and geometric mean ratios (5th percentile, 95th percentile) correspond to dose-adjusted maribavir with inducer vs 400 mg twice daily without inducer.
b Containing 800 mg aluminum hydroxide and 800 mg magnesium hydroxide.
c tau is maribavir dosing interval: 12 hours. |
Table 8: Drug Interactions: Changes in Pharmacokinetics for Coadministered Drug in the Presence of 400 mg Twice Daily LIVTENCITY
| Coadministered Drug and Regimen |
N |
Geometric Mean Ratio (90% CI) of Coadministered Drug PK with/without LIVTENCITY [No Effect=1.00] |
| AUC |
Cmax |
Ctau |
| Immunosuppressants |
| Tacrolimus |
stable dose, twice daily (total daily dose: 0.5-16 mg) |
20 |
1.51
(1.39, 1.65) |
1.38
(1.20, 1.57) |
1.57
(1.41, 1.74) |
| P-gp substrate |
| Digoxin |
0.5 mg single dose |
18 |
1.21
(1.10, 1.32) |
1.25
(1.13, 1.38) |
- |
Microbiology
Mechanism Of Action
The antiviral activity of maribavir is mediated by competitive inhibition of the protein kinase activity of human CMV enzyme pUL97, which results in inhibition of the phosphorylation of proteins. Maribavir inhibited wild-type pUL97 protein kinase in a biochemical assay with an IC50 value of 0.003 μM. Maribavir and its 5'-monoÂand 5'-triphosphate derivatives at 100 μM had no significant effect on the incorporation of deoxynucleoside triphosphates by human CMV DNA polymerase. At a concentration of 100 μM, neither maribavir nor its 5'Âtriphosphate derivative inhibited CMV DNA polymerase delta, however the 5'-monophosphate derivative inhibited incorporation by polymerase delta of all 4 natural dNTPs by approximately 55%.
Antiviral Activity
Maribavir inhibited human CMV replication in virus yield reduction, DNA hybridization, and plaque reduction assays in human lung fibroblast cell line (MRC-5), human embryonic kidney (HEK), and human foreskin fibroblast (MRHF) cells. The EC50 values ranged from 0.03 to 2.2 μM depending on the cell line and assay endpoint. The cell culture antiviral activity of maribavir has also been evaluated against CMV clinical isolates. The median EC50 values were 0.1 μM (n=10, range 0.03-0.13 μM) and 0.28 μM (n=10, range 0.12-0.56 μM) using DNA hybridization and plaque reduction assays, respectively. No significant difference in EC50 values across the four human CMV glycoprotein B genotypes (N=2, 1, 4, and 1 for gB1, gB2, gB3, and gB4, respectively) was seen.
Combination Antiviral Activity
When maribavir was tested in combination with other antiviral compounds, antagonism of the antiviral activity was seen in combination with ganciclovir. No antagonism was observed with cidofovir, foscarnet, letermovir and rapamycin at the drugs EC50 values. The pUL97 kinase activity inhibited by maribavir is necessary to activate valganciclovir/ganciclovir.
Treatment Effect In CMV Glycoprotein B (gB) Subtypes
In Trial 303, the primary endpoint response rates for LIVTENCITY across CMV gB subtypes 1, 2, 3, 4, and 5 were 65% (55/85), 39% (22/57), 54% (22/41), 67% (14/21), and 64% (7/11), respectively. The primary endpoint response rates for IAT across CMV gB subtypes 1, 2, 3, 4, and 5 were 28% (15/53), 27% (4/15), 11% (2/19), 20% (2/10), and 17% (1/6), respectively [see Clinical Studies].
Viral Resistance
In Cell Culture
Selection of maribavir resistant virus in cell culture and genotypic plus phenotypic characterization of these has identified amino acid substitutions that confer reduced susceptibility to maribavir. Substitutions identified in pUL97 include L337M, V353A, L397R, T409M, and H411L/N/Y. These substitutions confer reductions in susceptibility that range from 3.5-fold to >200-fold. Substitutions were also identified in pUL27:R233S, W362R, W153R, L193F, A269T, V353E, L426F, E22stop, W362stop, 218delC, and 301-311del. These substitutions confer reductions in susceptibility that range from 1.7- to 4.8-fold.
In Clinical Studies
In Phase 2 Study 202 evaluating maribavir in 120 hematopoietic stem cell transplant (HSCT) or solid organ transplant (SOT) recipients with phenotypic resistance to valganciclovir/ganciclovir, DNA sequence analysis of a select region of pUL97 (amino acids 270 to 482) and pUL27 (amino acids 108 to 424) was performed on 34 paired virologic failure samples. There were 25 patients with treatment-emergent maribavir resistance-associated substitution(s) in pUL97 F342Y (4.5-fold reduction in susceptibility), T409M (78-fold reduction), H411L/Y (69- and 12-fold reduction) and/or C480F (224-fold reduction).
In Phase 3 Study 303 evaluating maribavir in patients with phenotypic resistance to valganciclovir/ganciclovir, DNA sequence analysis of the entire coding regions of pUL97 and pUL27 was performed on 134 paired sequences from maribavir-treated patients. The treatment-emergent pUL97 substitutions F342Y (4.5-fold), T409M (78-fold), H411L/N/Y (69-, 9-, and 12-fold, respectively), and/or C480F (224-fold) were detected in 58 subjects (47 subjects were on-treatment failures and 11 subjects were relapsers). One subject with the pUL27 L193F substitution (2.6-fold reduced susceptibility to maribavir) at baseline did not meet the primary endpoint.
Cross-Resistance
Cross-resistance has been observed between maribavir and ganciclovir/valganciclovir in cell culture and in clinical studies.
pUL97 valganciclovir/ganciclovir resistance-associated substitutions F342S/Y, K355del, V356G, D456N, V466G, C480R, P521L, and Y617del reduce susceptibility to maribavir >4.5-fold. Other vGCV/GCV resistance pathways have not been evaluated for cross-resistance to maribavir. pUL54 DNA polymerase substitutions conferring resistance to vGCV/GCV, cidofovir, or foscarnet remained susceptible to maribavir.
Substitutions pUL97 F342Y and C480F are maribavir treatment-emergent resistance-associated substitutions that confer >1.5-fold reduced susceptibility to vGCV/GCV, a fold reduction that is associated with phenotypic resistance to vGCV/GCV. The clinical significance of this cross-resistance to vGCV/GCV for these substitutions has not been determined. Maribavir resistant virus remained susceptible to cidofovir and foscarnet. Additionally, there are no reports of any pUL27 maribavir resistance-associated substitutions being evaluated for vGCV/GCV, cidofovir, or foscarnet cross-resistance. Given the lack of resistance-associated substitutions for these drugs mapping to pUL27, cross-resistance is not expected for pUL27 maribavir substitutions.
Clinical Studies
Treatment Of Adults With Post-Transplant CMV Infection/Disease That Is Refractory (with or without Genotypic Resistance) To Ganciclovir, Valganciclovir, Cidofovir, Or Foscarnet
LIVTENCITY was evaluated in a Phase 3, multicenter, randomized, open-label, active-controlled superiority trial (NCT02931539, Trial 303) to assess the efficacy and safety of LIVTENCITY compared to Investigator-Assigned Treatment (IAT) (ganciclovir, valganciclovir, foscarnet, or cidofovir) in 352 HSCT or SOT recipients with CMV infections that were refractory to treatment with ganciclovir, valganciclovir, foscarnet, or cidofovir, including CMV infections with or without confirmed resistance to 1 or more of the IATs. Subjects with CMV disease involving the central nervous system, including the retina, were excluded from the study.
Subjects were stratified by transplant type (HSCT or SOT) and screening CMV DNA levels and then randomized in a 2:1 allocation ratio to receive either LIVTENCITY 400 mg twice daily or IAT as dosed by the investigator for up to 8 weeks. After completion of the treatment period, subjects entered a 12-week follow-up phase.
The mean age of trial subjects was 53 years and most subjects were male (61%), white (76%) and not Hispanic or Latino (83%), with similar distributions across the two treatment arms. The most common treatment used in the IAT arm was foscarnet which was administered in 47 (41%) subjects followed by ganciclovir or valganciclovir, each administered in 28 (24%) subjects. Cidofovir was administered in 6 subjects, the combination of foscarnet and valganciclovir in 4 subjects and the combination of foscarnet and ganciclovir in 3 subjects. Baseline disease characteristics are summarized in Table 9 below.
Table 9: Summary of Baseline Disease Characteristics in Trial 303
| Characteristic |
LIVTENCITY 400 mg Twice Daily
N=235 n (%) |
IAT
N=117 n (%) |
| Transplant type |
| HSCT |
93 (40) |
48 (41) |
| SOT |
142 (60) |
69 (59) |
| Kidney |
74 (52) |
32 (46) |
| Lung |
40 (28) |
22 (32) |
| Heart |
14 (10) |
9 (13) |
| Other (multiple, liver, pancreas, intestine) |
14 (10) |
6 (9) |
| CMV DNA levels |
| Low (<9,100 IU/mL) |
153 (65) |
85 (73) |
| Intermediate (≥9,100 to <91,000 IU/mL) |
68 (29) |
25 (21) |
| High (≥91,000 IU/mL) |
14 (6) |
7 (6) |
| Confirmed symptomatic CMV infection at baseline |
| No |
214 (91) |
109 (93) |
| Yesa |
21 (9) |
8 (7) |
| CMV syndrome (SOT only) |
9 (43) |
7 (88) |
| Tissue Invasive disease |
12 (57)a |
1 (13) |
CMV=cytomegalovirus, DNA=deoxyribonucleic acid, HSCT=hematopoietic stem cell transplant, IAT=investigator assigned anti-CMV treatment, N=number of patients, SOT=solid organ transplant.
a one of the subjects had both CMV syndrome and disease but was counted for CMV disease only. |
Primary Efficacy Endpoint
The primary efficacy endpoint was confirmed CMV DNA level < LLOQ (i.e;, <137 IU/mL) as assessed by COBAS® AmpliPrep/COBAS® TaqMan® CMV test) at the end of Week 8. The key secondary endpoint was CMV DNA level < LLOQ and CMV infection symptom control at the end of Study Week 8 with maintenance of this treatment effect through Study Week 16.
For the primary endpoint, LIVTENCITY was statistically superior to IAT (56% vs 24%, respectively), as shown in Table 10.
Table 10: Primary Efficacy Endpoint Analysis at Week 8 (Randomized Set) in Trial 303
|
LIVTENCITY 400 mg Twice Daily
N=235 n (%) |
IAT
N=117 n (%) |
| Primary Endpoint: Confirmed CMV DNA Level < LLOQ at Week 8a |
| Responders |
131 (56) |
28 (24) |
| Adjusted difference in proportion of responders (95% CI)b |
33 (23, 43) |
|
| p-value: adjustedb |
<0.001 |
|
CI=confidence interval; CMV=cytomegalovirus; IAT=investigator-assigned anti-CMV treatment; N=number of patients.
a Confirmed CMV DNA level < LLOQ at the end of Week 8 (2 consecutive samples separated by at least 5 days with DNA levels < LLOQ [i.e:, <137 IU/mL]).
b Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel weighted average approach was used for the adjusted difference in proportion (maribavir – IAT), the corresponding 95% CI, and the p-value after adjusting for the transplant type and baseline plasma CMV DNA concentration. Only those with both stratification factors were included in the computation. |
The reasons for failure to meet the primary endpoint are summarized in Table 11.
Table 11: Analysis of Failures for Primary Efficacy Endpoint
| Outcome at Week 8 |
LIVTENCITY
N=235
n (%) |
IAT
N=117
n (%) |
| Responders (Confirmed DNA Level < LLOQ)a |
131 (56) |
28 (24) |
| Non-responders: |
104 (44) |
89 (76) |
| Due to virologic failureb: |
80 (34) |
42 (36) |
|
|
48 (20) |
35 (30) |
|
|
32 (14) |
7 (6) |
| Due to drug/study discontinuation: |
21 (9) |
44 (38) |
|
|
8 (3) |
26 (22) |
|
|
10 (4) |
3 (3) |
|
|
1 (<1) |
9 (8) |
|
|
2 (1) |
6 (5) |
| Due to other reasons but remained on studyd |
3 (1) |
3 (3) |
CMV=Cytomegalovirus, IAT=Investigator-assigned anti-CMV Treatment, MBV=maribavir.
Percentages are based on the number of subjects in the Randomized Set.
a Confirmed CMV DNA level < LLOQ at the end of Week 8 (2 consecutive samples separated by at least 5 days with DNA levels < LLOQ [i.e:, <137 IU/mL]).
b CMV DNA breakthrough=achieved confirmed CMV DNA level < LLOQ and subsequently became detectable.
c Other reasons=other reasons not including adverse events, deaths and lack of efficacy, withdrawal of consent, and nonÂcompliance.
d Includes subjects who completed study assigned treatment and were non-responders. |
The treatment effect of LIVTENCITY was consistent across transplant type, age group, and the presence of CMV syndrome/disease at baseline. However, LIVTENCITY was less effective against subjects with increased CMV DNA levels (≥50,000 IU/mL) and subjects with absence of genotypic resistance (see Table 12).
Table 12: Responders by Subgroup in Trial 303
|
LIVTENCITY 400 mg Twice Daily
N=235 |
IAT
N=117 |
| n/N |
% |
n/N |
% |
| Transplant type |
| SOT |
79/142 |
56 |
18/69 |
26 |
| HSCT |
52/93 |
56 |
10/48 |
21 |
| Baseline CMV DNA viral load |
| Low (<9,100 IU/mL) |
95/153 |
62 |
21/85 |
25 |
| Intermediate (≥9,100 to <91,000 IU/mL) |
32/68 |
47 |
5/25 |
20 |
| ≥9,100 to <50,000 IU/mL |
29/59 |
49 |
4/20 |
20 |
| ≥50,000 to <91,000 IU/mL |
3/9 |
33 |
1/5 |
20 |
| High (≥91,000 IU/mL) |
4/14 |
29 |
2/7 |
29 |
| Genotypic resistance to other anti-CMV agents |
| Yes |
76/121 |
63 |
14/69 |
20 |
| No |
42/96 |
44 |
11/34 |
32 |
| CMV syndrome/disease at baseline |
| Yes |
10/21 |
48 |
1/8 |
13 |
| No |
121/214 |
57 |
27/109 |
25 |
| Age Group |
| 18 to 44 years |
28/55 |
51 |
8/32 |
25 |
| 45 to 64 years |
71/126 |
56 |
19/69 |
28 |
| ≥65 years |
32/54 |
59 |
1/16 |
6 |
Secondary Endpoints
Table 13 shows results of the secondary endpoint, achievement of CMV DNA level < LLOQ and symptom controla at Week 8 with maintenance through Week 16.
Table 13: Achievement of CMV DNA Level < LLOQ and CMV Infection Symptom Control at Week 8, With Maintenance Through Week 16a
|
LIVTENCITY 400 mg Twice Daily
N=235 n (%) |
IAT
N=117 n (%) |
| Responders |
44 (19) |
12 (10) |
| Adjusted difference in proportion of responders (95% CI)b |
9 (2,17) |
|
| p-value: adjustedb |
0.013 |
|
a CMV infection symptom control was defined as resolution or improvement of tissue-invasive disease or CMV syndrome for symptomatic patients at baseline, or no new symptoms for patients who were asymptomatic at baseline.
b Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel weighted average approach was used for the adjusted difference in proportion (maribavir – IAT), the corresponding 95% CI, and the p-value after adjusting for the transplant type and baseline plasma CMV DNA concentration. Only those with both stratification factors were included in the computation. |
Virologic Relapse During Follow-Up Period
After the end of treatment phase, 65/131 (50%) of subjects in the LIVTENCITY group and 11/28 (39%) subjects in the IAT group who achieved CMV DNA level < LLOQ experienced virologic relapse during the follow-up period. Most of the relapses 58/65 (89%) in LIVTENCITY group and 11/11 (100% in IAT group)] occurred within 4 weeks after study drug discontinuation; and the median time to relapse after CMV DNA level < LLOQ was 15 days (range 7, 71) in the LIVTENCITY group and 15 days (range 7, 29) in the IAT group [see WARNINGS AND PRECAUTIONS and Microbiology].
New Onset Symptomatic CMV Infection
For the entire study period, a similar percentage of subjects in each treatment group developed new onset symptomatic CMV infection (LIVTENCITY 6% [14/235]; IAT 6% [7/113]).
Overall Mortality
All-cause mortality was assessed for the entire study period. A similar percentage of subjects in each treatment group died during the trial (LIVTENCITY 11% [27/235]; IAT 11% [13/117]).