CLINICAL PHARMACOLOGY
Mechanism Of Action
Binding of the PD-1 ligands, PD-L1 and PD-L2, to the PD-1 receptor found on T cells, inhibits T cell proliferation and cytokine production. Upregulation of PD-1 ligands occurs in some tumors and signaling through this pathway can contribute to inhibition of active T-cell immune surveillance of tumors. Pembrolizumab is a monoclonal antibody that binds to the PD-1 receptor and blocks its interaction with PD-L1 and PD-L2, releasing PD-1 pathway-mediated inhibition of the immune response, including the anti-tumor immune response. In syngeneic mouse tumor models, blocking PD-1 activity resulted in decreased tumor growth.
Pharmacodynamics
Based on dose/exposure efficacy and safety relationships, there are no clinically significant differences in efficacy and safety between pembrolizumab doses of 200 mg or 2 mg/kg every 3 weeks in patients with melanoma or NSCLC.
Pharmacokinetics
The pharmacokinetics (PK) of pembrolizumab was characterized using a population PK analysis with concentration data collected from 2993 patients with various cancers who received pembrolizumab doses of 1 to 10 mg/kg every 2 weeks, 2 to 10 mg/kg every 3 weeks, or 200 mg every 3 weeks. Pembrolizumab clearance (CV%) is approximately 23% lower [geometric mean, 195 mL/day (40%)] at steady state than that after the first dose [252 mL/day (37%)]; this decrease in clearance with time is not considered clinically important. The geometric mean value (CV%) for volume of distribution at steady state is 6.0 L (20%) and for terminal half-life (t1/2) is 22 days (32%).
Steady-state concentrations of pembrolizumab were reached by 16 weeks of repeated dosing with an every 3-week regimen and the systemic accumulation was 2.1-fold. The peak concentration (Cmax), trough concentration (Cmin), and area under the plasma concentration versus time curve at steady state (AUCss) of pembrolizumab increased dose proportionally in the dose range of 2 to 10 mg/kg every 3 weeks.
Specific Populations
The following factors had no clinically important effect on the CL of pembrolizumab: age (range: 15 to 94 years), sex, race (89% White), renal impairment (eGFR greater than or equal to
15 mL/min/1.73 m2), mild hepatic impairment (total bilirubin less than or equal to upper limit of normal (ULN) and AST greater than ULN or total bilirubin between 1 and 1.5 times ULN and any AST), or tumor burden. There is insufficient information to determine whether there are clinically important differences in the CL of pembrolizumab in patients with moderate or severe hepatic impairment. Pembrolizumab concentrations with weight-based dosing at 2 mg/kg every 3 weeks in pediatric patients (2 to 17 years) are comparable to those of adults at the same dose.
Animal Toxicology And/Or Pharmacology
In animal models, inhibition of PD-1 signaling resulted in an increased severity of some infections and enhanced inflammatory responses. M. tuberculosis-infected PD-1 knockout mice exhibit markedly decreased survival compared with wild-type controls, which correlated with increased bacterial proliferation and inflammatory responses in these animals. PD-1 knockout mice have also shown decreased survival following infection with lymphocytic choriomeningitis virus (LCMV). Administration of pembrolizumab in chimpanzees with naturally occurring chronic hepatitis B infection resulted in two out of four animals with significantly increased levels of serum ALT, AST, and GGT, which persisted for at least 1 month after discontinuation of pembrolizumab.
Clinical Studies
Melanoma
Ipilimumab-Naive Melanoma
The safety and efficacy of KEYTRUDA were evaluated in Study KEYNOTE-006 (NCT01866319), a randomized (1:1:1), open-label, multicenter, active-controlled trial. Patients were randomized to receive KEYTRUDA at a dose of 10 mg/kg every 2 weeks or 10mg/kg every 3 weeks as an intravenous infusion until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity or to ipilimumab 3 mg/kg every 3 weeks as an intravenous infusion for 4 doses unless discontinued earlier for disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. Patients with disease progression could receive additional doses of treatment unless disease progression was symptomatic, was rapidly progressive, required urgent intervention, occurred with a decline in performance status, or was confirmed at 4 to 6 weeks with repeat imaging. Randomization was stratified by line of therapy (0 vs. 1), ECOG PS (0 vs. 1), and PD-L1 expression (≥1% of tumor cells [positive] vs. <1% of tumor cells [negative]) according to an investigational use only (IUO) assay. Key eligibility criteria were unresectable or metastatic melanoma; no prior ipilimumab; and no more than one prior systemic treatment for metastatic melanoma. Patients with BRAF V600E mutation-positive melanoma were not required to have received prior BRAF inhibitor therapy. Patients with autoimmune disease; a medical condition that required immunosuppression; previous severe hypersensitivity to other monoclonal antibodies; and HIV, hepatitis B or hepatitis C infection, were ineligible. Assessment of tumor status was performed at 12 weeks, then every 6 weeks through Week 48, followed by every 12 weeks thereafter. The major efficacy outcome measures were overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS; as assessed by blinded independent central review (BICR) using Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors [RECIST v1.1]). Additional efficacy outcome measures were overall response rate (ORR) and response duration.
A total of 834 patients were randomized: 277 patients to the KEYTRUDA 10 mg/kg every 3 weeks arm, 279 to the KEYTRUDA 10 mg/kg every 2 weeks arm, and 278 to the ipilimumab arm. The study population characteristics were: median age of 62 years (range: 18 to 89 years), 60% male, 98% White, 66% had no prior systemic therapy for metastatic disease, 69% ECOG PS of 0, 80% had PD-L1 positive
melanoma, 18% had PD-L1 negative melanoma, and 2% had unknown PD-L1 status using the IUO assay, 65% had M1c stage disease, 68% with normal LDH, 36% with reported BRAF mutation-positive melanoma, and 9% with a history of brain metastases. Among patients with BRAF mutation-positive melanoma, 139 (46%) were previously treated with a BRAF inhibitor.
The study demonstrated statistically significant improvements in OS and PFS for patients randomized to KEYTRUDA as compared to ipilimumab (Table 16 and Figure 1).
Table 16: Efficacy Results in KEYNOTE-006
|
KEYTRUDA
10 mg/kg every3 weeks n=277 |
KEYTRUDA
10 mg/kg every2 weeks n=279 |
Ipilimumab
3 mg/kg every3 weeks
n=278 |
OS |
Deaths (%) |
92 (33%) |
85 (30%) |
112 (40%) |
Hazard ratio* (95% CI) |
0.69 (0.52, 0.90) |
0.63 (0.47, 0.83) |
- |
p-
Value (stratified log-rank) |
0.004 |
<0.001 |
- |
PFS
by BICR |
Events (%) |
157 (57%) |
157 (56%) |
188 (68%) |
Median in months (95% CI) |
4.1 (2.9, 6.9) |
5.5 (3.4, 6.9) |
2.8 (2.8, 2.9) |
Hazard ratio* (95% CI) |
0.58 (0.47, 0.72) |
0.58 (0.46, 0.72) |
- |
p-
Value (stratified log-rank) |
<0.001 |
<0.001 |
- |
Best
overall response by BICR |
ORR (95% CI) |
33% (27, 39) |
34% (28, 40) |
12% (8, 16) |
Complete response rate |
6% |
5% |
1% |
Partial response rate |
27% |
29% |
10% |
* Hazard ratio (KEYTRUDA compared to ipilimumab) based on the stratified Cox proportional hazard model |
Among the 91 patients randomized to KEYTRUDA 10 mg/kg every 3 weeks with an objective response, response durations ranged from 1.4+ to 8.1+ months. Among the 94 patients randomized to KEYTRUDA 10 mg/kg every 2 weeks with an objective response, response durations ranged from 1.4+ to 8.2 months.
Figure 1: Kaplan-Meier Curve for Overall Survival in KEYNOTE-006*
Ipilimumab-Refractory Melanoma
The safety and efficacy of KEYTRUDA were evaluated in Study KEYNOTE-002 (NCT01704287), a multicenter, randomized (1:1:1), active-controlled trial. Patients were randomized to receive one of two doses of KEYTRUDA in a blinded fashion or investigator’s choice chemotherapy. The treatment arms consisted of KEYTRUDA 2 mg/kg or 10 mg/kg intravenously every 3 weeks or investigator’s choice of any of the following chemotherapy regimens: dacarbazine 1000 mg/m2 intravenously every 3 weeks (26%), temozolomide 200 mg/m2 orally once daily for 5 days every 28 days (25%), carboplatin AUC 6 intravenously plus paclitaxel 225 mg/m2 intravenously every 3 weeks for four cycles then carboplatin AUC of 5 plus paclitaxel 175 mg/m2 every 3 weeks (25%), paclitaxel 175 mg/m2 intravenously every 3 weeks (16%), or carboplatin AUC 5 or 6 intravenously every 3 weeks (8%). Randomization was stratified by
ECOG performance status (0 vs. 1), LDH levels (normal vs. elevated [≥110% ULN]) and BRAF V600
mutation status (wild-type [WT] or V600E). The trial included patients with unresectable or metastatic melanoma with progression of disease; refractory to two or more doses of ipilimumab (3 mg/kg or higher) and, if BRAF V600 mutation-positive, a BRAF or MEK inhibitor; and disease progression within 24 weeks following the last dose of ipilimumab. The trial excluded patients with uveal melanoma and active brain metastasis. Patients received KEYTRUDA until unacceptable toxicity; disease progression that was symptomatic, was rapidly progressive, required urgent intervention, occurred with a decline in performance status, or was confirmed at 4 to 6 weeks with repeat imaging; withdrawal of consent; or physician’s decision to stop therapy for the patient. Assessment of tumor status was performed at 12 weeks after randomization, then every 6 weeks through week 48, followed by every 12 weeks thereafter. Patients on chemotherapy who experienced progression of disease were offered KEYTRUDA. The major efficacy outcomes were progression-free survival (PFS) as assessed by BICR per RECIST
v1.1 and overall survival (OS). Additional efficacy outcome measures were confirmed overall response rate (ORR) as assessed by BICR per RECIST v1.1 and duration of response.
The treatment arms consisted of KEYTRUDA 2 mg/kg (n=180) or 10 mg/kg (n=181) every 3 weeks or investigator’s choice chemotherapy (n=179). Among the 540 randomized patients, the median age was 62 years (range: 15 to 89 years), with 43% age 65 or older; 61% male; 98% White; and ECOG performance score was 0 (55%) and 1 (45%). Twenty-three percent of patients were BRAF V600 mutation positive, 40% had elevated LDH at baseline, 82% had M1c disease, and 73% had two or more prior therapies for advanced or metastatic disease.
The study demonstrated a statistically significant improvement in PFS for patients randomized to KEYTRUDA as compared to control arm (Table 17). There was no statistically significant difference between KEYTRUDA 2 mg/kg and chemotherapy or between KEYTRUDA 10 mg/kg and chemotherapy in the OS analysis in which 55% of the patients who had been randomized to receive chemotherapy had crossed over to receive KEYTRUDA.
Table 17: Efficacy Results in KEYNOTE-002
|
KEYTRUDA
2 mg/kg every 3 weeks
n=180 |
KEYTRUDA
10 mg/kg every 3 weeks
n=181 |
Chemotherapy
n=179 |
Progression-Free Survival |
Number of Events, n (%) |
129 (72%) |
126 (70%) |
155 (87%) |
Progression, n (%) |
105 (58%) |
107 (59%) |
134 (75%) |
Death, n (%) |
24 (13%) |
19 (10%) |
21 (12%) |
Median in months (95% CI) |
2.9 (2.8, 3.8) |
2.9 (2.8, 4.7) |
2.7 (2.5, 2.8) |
p-Value (stratified log-rank) |
<0.001 |
<0.001 |
- |
Hazard
ratio* (95% CI) |
0.57 (0.45, 0.73) |
0.50 (0.39, 0.64) |
- |
Overall Survival† |
Deaths (%) |
123 (68%) |
117 (65%) |
128 (72%) |
Hazard ratio* (95% CI) |
0.86 (0.67, 1.10) |
0.74 (0.57, 0.96) |
- |
p-
Value (stratified log-rank) |
0.117 |
0.011‡ |
- |
Median
in months (95% CI) |
13.4 (11.0, 16.4) |
14.7 (11.3, 19.5) |
11.0 (8.9, 13.8) |
Objective Response Rate |
ORR (95% CI) |
21% (15, 28) |
25% (19, 32) |
4% (2, 9) |
Complete response rate |
2% |
3% |
0% |
Partial response rate |
19% |
23% |
4% |
* Hazard ratio (KEYTRUDA compared to chemotherapy) based on the stratified Cox proportional hazard model
† With additional follow-up of 18 months after the PFS analysis
‡ Not statistically significant compared to multiplicity adjusted significance level of 0.01 |
Figure 2: Kaplan-Meier Curve for Progression-Free Survival in KEYNOTE-002
Among the 38 patients randomized to KEYTRUDA 2 mg/kg with an objective response, response durations ranged from 1.3+ to 11.5+ months. Among the 46 patients randomized to KEYTRUDA 10 mg/kg with an objective response, response durations ranged from 1.1+ to 11.1+ months.
Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer
First-Line Treatment Of Metastatic NSCLC As A Single Agent
Study KEYNOTE-024 (NCT02142738) was a randomized, multicenter, open-label, active-controlled trial in patients with metastatic NSCLC, whose tumors had high PD-L1 expression [tumor proportion score (TPS) of 50% or greater] by an immunohistochemistry assay using the PD-L1 IHC 22C3 pharmDx Kit, and had not received prior systemic treatment for metastatic NSCLC. Patients with EGFR or ALK genomic tumor aberrations; autoimmune disease that required systemic therapy within 2 years of treatment; a medical condition that required immunosuppression; or who had received more than 30 Gy of radiation in the thoracic region within the prior 26 weeks of initiation of study were ineligible. Randomization was stratified by ECOG performance status (0 vs. 1), histology (squamous vs. nonsquamous), and geographic region (East Asia vs. non-East Asia). Patients were randomized (1:1) to receive KEYTRUDA 200 mg intravenously every 3 weeks or investigator’s choice of any of the following platinum-containing chemotherapy regimens:
- Pemetrexed 500 mg/m2 every 3 weeks and carboplatin AUC 5 to 6 mg/mL/min every 3 weeks on Day 1 for 4 to 6 cycles followed by optional pemetrexed 500 mg/m2 every 3 weeks for patients with nonsquamous histologies;
- Pemetrexed 500 mg/m2 every 3 weeks and cisplatin 75 mg/m2 every 3 weeks on Day 1 for 4 to 6 cycles followed by optional pemetrexed 500 mg/m2 every 3 weeks for patients with nonsquamous histologies;
- Gemcitabine 1250 mg/m2 on days 1 and 8 and cisplatin 75 mg/m2 every 3 weeks on Day 1 for 4 to 6 cycles;
- Gemcitabine 1250 mg/m2 on Days 1 and 8 and carboplatin AUC 5 to 6 mg/mL/min every 3 weeks on Day 1 for 4 to 6 cycles;
- Paclitaxel 200 mg/m2 every 3 weeks and carboplatin AUC 5 to 6 mg/mL/min every 3 weeks on Day 1 for 4 to 6 cycles followed by optional pemetrexed maintenance (for nonsquamous histologies).
Treatment with KEYTRUDA continued until RECIST 1.1-defined progression of disease as determined by an independent radiology committee, unacceptable toxicity, or for up to 24 months. Treatment could continue beyond disease progression if the patient was clinically stable and was considered to be deriving
clinical benefit by the investigator. Patients randomized to chemotherapy were offered KEYTRUDA at the time of disease progression.
Assessment of tumor status was performed every 9 weeks. The main efficacy outcome measure was PFS as assessed by a blinded independent central radiologists’ (BICR) review according to RECIST 1.1. Additional efficacy outcome measures were OS and ORR as assessed by the BICR according to RECIST 1.1.
A total of 305 patients were randomized: 154 patients to the KEYTRUDA arm and 151 to the chemotherapy arm. The study population characteristics were: median age of 65 years (range: 33 to 90), 54% age 65 or older; 61% male; 82% white and 15% Asian; 65% ECOG performance status of 1; 18% with squamous and 82% with nonsquamous histology and 9% with history of brain metastases. A total of 66 patients in the chemotherapy arm received KEYTRUDA at the time of disease progression.
The trial demonstrated a statistically significant improvement in PFS for patients randomized to KEYTRUDA as compared with chemotherapy. Additionally, a pre-specified interim OS analysis at 108 events (64% of the events needed for final analysis) also demonstrated statistically significant improvement of OS for patients randomized to KEYTRUDA as compared with chemotherapy. Table 18 summarizes key efficacy measures for KEYNOTE-024.
Table 18: Efficacy Results in KEYNOTE-024
Endpoint |
KEYTRUDA
200 mg every 3 weeks n=154 |
Chemotherapy
n=151 |
PFS |
|
|
Number (%) of patients with event |
73 (47%) |
116 (77%) |
Median in months (95% CI) |
10.3 (6.7, NR) |
6.0 (4.2, 6.2) |
Hazard ratio* (95% CI) |
0.50 (0.37, 0.68) |
p-Value (stratified log-rank) |
<0.001 |
OS |
|
|
Number (%) of patients with event |
44 (29%) |
64 (42%) |
Median in months (95% CI) |
NR
(NR, NR) |
NR
(9.4, NR) |
Hazard ratio* (95% CI) |
0.60 (0.41, 0.89) |
p-Value (stratified log-rank) |
0.005† |
Objective Response Rate |
|
|
ORR (95% CI) |
45% (37, 53) |
28% (21, 36) |
Complete response rate |
4% |
1% |
Partial response rate |
41% |
27% |
p-Value (Miettinen-Nurminen) |
0.001 |
Median duration of response in months (range) |
NR (1.9+, 14.5+) |
6.3 (2.1+, 12.6+) |
* Based on the stratified Cox proportional hazard model
† p-Value is compared with 0.0118 of the allocated alpha for this interim
analysis.
NR = not reached |
Figure 3: Kaplan-Meier Curve for Overall Survival in KEYNOTE-024
First-Line Treatment Of Metastatic Nonsquamous NSCLC In Combination With Pemetrexed And Carboplatin
The efficacy of KEYTRUDA was investigated in patients enrolled in an open-label, multicenter, multi-cohort study, Study KEYNOTE-021 (NCT02039674); the efficacy data are limited to patients with metastatic nonsquamous NSCLC randomized within a single cohort (Cohort G1). The key eligibility criteria for this cohort were locally advanced or metastatic nonsquamous NSCLC, regardless of tumor PD-L1 expression status, and no prior systemic treatment for metastatic disease. Patients with autoimmune disease that required systemic therapy within 2 years of treatment; a medical condition that required immunosuppression; or who had received more than 30 Gy of thoracic radiation within the prior 26 weeks were ineligible. Randomization was stratified by PD-L1 tumor expression (TPS <1% vs. TPS ≥1%). Patients were randomized (1:1) to one of the following treatment arms:
- KEYTRUDA 200 mg, pemetrexed 500 mg/m2, and carboplatin AUC 5 mg/mL/min intravenously on Day 1 of each 21-day cycle for 4 cycles followed by KEYTRUDA 200 mg intravenously every 3 weeks. KEYTRUDA was administered prior to chemotherapy on Day 1.
- Pemetrexed 500 mg/m2 and carboplatin AUC 5 mg/mL/min intravenously on Day 1 of each
21-day cycle for 4 cycles.
At the investigator’s discretion, maintenance pemetrexed 500 mg/m2 every 3 weeks was permitted in both treatment arms.
Treatment with KEYTRUDA continued until RECIST 1.1-defined progression of disease as determined by blinded independent central review (BICR), unacceptable toxicity, or a maximum of 24 months. Administration of KEYTRUDA was permitted beyond RECIST-defined disease progression if the patient was clinically stable and deriving clinical benefit as determined by the investigator.
Patients on chemotherapy were offered KEYTRUDA as a single agent at the time of disease progression.
Assessment of tumor status was performed every 6 weeks through Week 18 and every 9 weeks thereafter. The major efficacy outcome measure was objective response rate (ORR) as assessed by BICR using RECIST 1.1. Additional efficacy outcome measures were progression-free survival (PFS) as assessed by BICR using RECIST 1.1, duration of response, and overall survival (OS).
A total of 123 patients were randomized: 60 patients to the KEYTRUDA and chemotherapy arm and 63 to the chemotherapy arm. The study population characteristics were: median age of 64 years (range: 37 to 80); 48% age 65 or older; 39% male; 87% White and 8% Asian; ECOG performance status of 0 (41%) and 1 (56%); 97% had metastatic disease; and 12% had brain metastases. Thirty-six percent had tumor PD-L1 expression TPS <1%; no patients had sensitizing EGFR or ALK genomic aberrations. A total of 20 (32%) patients in the chemotherapy arm received KEYTRUDA at the time of disease progression and 12 (19%) additional patients received a checkpoint inhibitor as subsequent therapy.
In Cohort G1 of KEYNOTE-021, there was a statistically significant improvement in ORR in patients randomized to KEYTRUDA in combination with pemetrexed and carboplatin compared with pemetrexed and carboplatin alone (see Table 19).
Table 19: Efficacy Results in Cohort G1 of KEYNOTE-021
Endpoint |
KEYTRUDA Pemetrexed Carboplatin
n=60 |
Pemetrexed Carboplatin
n=63 |
Overall Response Rate |
|
|
Overall response rate |
55% |
29% |
(95% CI) |
(42, 68) |
6.0 (4.2, 6.2) |
Complete response |
0% |
0% |
Partial response |
55% |
29% |
p-Value* |
0.0032 |
Duration of Response |
|
|
% with duration ≥ 6 months† |
93% |
81% |
Range (months) |
1.4+ to 13.0+ |
1.4+ to 15.2+ |
PFS |
|
|
Number of events (%) |
23 (38%) |
33 (52%) |
Progressive disease |
15 (25%) |
27 (43%) |
Death |
8 (13%) |
6 (10%) |
Median in months (95% CI) |
13.0 (8.3, NE) |
8.9 (4.4, 10.3) |
Hazard ratio‡ (95% CI) |
0.53 (0.31, 0.91) |
p-Value§ |
0.0205 |
* Based on Miettinen-Nurminen method stratified by PD-L1 status (TPS <1% vs. TPS ≥1%).
† Based on Kaplan-Meier estimation
‡ Based on the Cox proportional hazard model stratified by PD-L1 status (TPS <1% vs. TPS
≥1%).
§ Based on the log-rank test stratified by PD-L1 status (TPS <1% vs. TPS ≥1%).
NE = not estimable |
Exploratory analyses for ORR were conducted in subgroups defined by the stratification variable, PD-L1
tumor expression (TPS <1% and TPS ≥1%). In the TPS <1% subgroup, the ORR was 57% in the KEYTRUDA-containing arm and 13.0% in the chemotherapy arm. In the TPS ≥1% subgroup, the ORR was 54% in the KEYTRUDA-containing arm and 38% in the chemotherapy arm.
Previously Treated NSCLC
The efficacy of KEYTRUDA was investigated in Study KEYNOTE-010 (NCT01905657), a randomized, multicenter, open-label, active-controlled trial conducted in patients with metastatic NSCLC that had progressed following platinum-containing chemotherapy, and if appropriate, targeted therapy for EGFR or ALK genomic tumor aberrations. Eligible patients had PD-L1 expression TPS of 1% or greater by an immunohistochemistry assay using the PD-L1 IHC 22C3 pharmDx Kit. Patients with autoimmune disease; a medical condition that required immunosuppression; or who had received more than 30 Gy of thoracic radiation within the prior 26 weeks were ineligible. Randomization was stratified by tumor PD-L1 expression (PD-L1 expression TPS ≥50% vs. PD-L1 expression TPS=1-49%), ECOG performance scale (0 vs. 1), and geographic region (East Asia vs. non-East Asia). Patients were randomized (1:1:1) to receive KEYTRUDA 2 mg/kg intravenously every 3 weeks, KEYTRUDA 10 mg/kg intravenously every 3 weeks or docetaxel intravenously 75 mg/m2 every 3 weeks until unacceptable toxicity or disease progression. Patients randomized to KEYTRUDA were permitted to continue until disease progression that was symptomatic, rapidly progressive, required urgent intervention, occurred with a decline in performance status, or confirmation of progression at 4 to 6 weeks with repeat imaging or for up to 24 months without disease progression.
Assessment of tumor status was performed every 9 weeks. The main efficacy outcome measures were OS and PFS as assessed by the BICR according to RECIST 1.1 in the subgroup of patients with TPS
≥50% and the overall population with TPS ≥1%. Additional efficacy outcome measures were ORR and response duration in the subgroup of patients with TPS ≥50% and the overall population with TPS ≥1%.
A total of 1033 patients were randomized: 344 to the KEYTRUDA 2 mg/kg arm, 346 patients to the KEYTRUDA 10 mg/kg arm, and 343 patients to the docetaxel arm. The study population characteristics were: median age 63 years (range: 20 to 88), 42% age 65 or older; 61% male; 72% White and 21% Asian; 66% ECOG performance status 1; 43% with high PD-L1 tumor expression; 21% with squamous, 70% with nonsquamous, and 8% with mixed, other or unknown histology; 91% metastatic (M1) disease; 15% with history of brain metastases; and 8% and 1% with EGFR and ALK genomic aberrations, respectively. All patients had received prior therapy with a platinum-doublet regimen, 29% received two or more prior therapies for their metastatic disease.
Tables 20 and 21 summarize key efficacy measures in the subgroup with TPS ≥50% population and in all patients, respectively. The Kaplan-Meier curve for OS (TPS ≥1%) is shown in Figure 4.
Table 20: Efficacy Results of the Subgroup of Patients with TPS ≥50% in KEYNOTE-010
Endpoint |
KEYTRUDA
2 mg/kg every 3 weeks
n=139 |
KEYTRUDA
10 mg/kg every 3 weeks
n=151 |
Docetaxel
75 mg/m2 every 3 weeks
n=152 |
OS |
|
|
|
Deaths(%) |
58 (42%) |
60 (40%) |
86 (57%) |
Median in months (95% CI) |
14.9 (10.4, NR) |
17.3 (11.8, NR) |
8.2 (6.4, 10.7) |
Hazard ratio* (95% CI) |
0.54 (0.38, 0.77) |
0.50 (0.36, 0.70) |
- |
p-
Value (stratified log-rank) |
<0.001 |
<0.001 |
- |
PFS |
|
|
|
Events(%) |
89 (64%) |
97 (64%) |
118 (78%) |
Median in months (95% CI) |
5.2 (4.0, 6.5) |
5.2 (4.1, 8.1) |
4.1 (3.6, 4.3) |
Hazard ratio* (95% CI) |
0.58 (0.43, 0.77) |
0.59 (0.45, 0.78) |
- |
p-
Value (stratified log-rank) |
<0.001 |
<0.001 |
- |
Objective
response rate |
|
|
|
ORR† (95% CI) |
30% (23, 39) |
29% (22, 37) |
8% (4, 13) |
p-Value (Miettinen-Nurminen) |
<0.001 |
<0.001 |
- |
Median
duration of response in months (range) |
NR (0.7+, 16.8+) |
NR (2.1+, 17.8+) |
8.1 (2.1+, 8.8+) |
* Hazard ratio (KEYTRUDA compared to docetaxel) based on the stratified Cox proportional hazard
model
† All responses were partial responses
NR = not reached |
Table 21: Efficacy Results of All Randomized Patients (TPS ≥1%) in KEYNOTE-010
Endpoint |
KEYTRUDA
2 mg/kg every 3 weeks n=344 |
KEYTRUDA
10 mg/kg every 3 weeks n=346 |
Docetaxel
75 mg/m2 every 3 weeks
n=343 |
OS |
|
|
|
Deaths (%) |
172 (50%) |
156 (45%) |
193 (56%) |
Median in months (95% CI) |
10.4 (9.4, 11.9) |
12.7 (10.0, 17.3) |
8.5 (7.5, 9.8) |
Hazard ratio* (95% CI) |
0.71 (0.58, 0.88) |
0.61 (0.49, 0.75) |
- |
p-
Value (stratified log-rank) |
<0.001 |
<0.001 |
- |
PFS |
|
|
|
Events (%) |
266 (77%) |
255 (74%) |
257 (75%) |
Median in months (95% CI) |
3.9 (3.1, 4.1) |
4.0 (2.6, 4.3) |
4.0 (3.1, 4.2) |
Hazard ratio* (95% CI) |
0.88 (0.73, 1.04) |
0.79 (0.66, 0.94) |
- |
p-
Value (stratified log-rank) |
0.068 |
0.005 |
- |
Objective
response rate |
|
|
|
ORR† (95% CI) |
18% (14, 23) |
19% (15, 23) |
9% (7, 13) |
p-Value (Miettinen-Nurminen) |
<0.001 |
<0.001 |
- |
Median
duration of response in months (range) |
NR (0.7+, 20.1+) |
NR (2.1+, 17.8+) |
6.2 (1.4+, 8.8+) |
* Hazard ratio (KEYTRUDA compared to docetaxel) based on the stratified Cox proportional hazard model
† All responses were partial responses
NR = not reached |
Figure 4: Kaplan-Meier Curve for Overall Survival in all Randomized Patients in KEYNOTE-010 (TPS ≥1%)
Head And Neck Cancer
The efficacy of KEYTRUDA was investigated in Study KEYNOTE-012 (NCT01848834), a multicenter, non-randomized, open-label, multi-cohort study that enrolled 174 patients with recurrent or metastatic HNSCC who had disease progression on or after platinum-containing chemotherapy administered for recurrent or metastatic HNSCC or following platinum-containing chemotherapy administered as part of induction, concurrent, or adjuvant therapy. Patients with active autoimmune disease, a medical condition that required immunosuppression, evidence of interstitial lung disease, or ECOG PS ≥2 were ineligible.
Patients received KEYTRUDA 10 mg/kg every 2 weeks (n=53) or 200 mg every 3 weeks (n=121) until unacceptable toxicity or disease progression that was symptomatic, was rapidly progressive, required urgent intervention, occurred with a decline in performance status, or was confirmed at least 4 weeks later with repeat imaging. Patients without disease progression were treated for up to 24 months. Treatment with pembrolizumab could be reinitiated for subsequent disease progression and administered for up to 1 additional year. Assessment of tumor status was performed every 8 weeks. The major efficacy outcome measures were ORR according to RECIST 1.1, as assessed by blinded independent central review, and duration of response.
Among the 174 patients, the baseline characteristics were median age 60 years (32% age 65 or older); 82% male; 75% White, 16% Asian, and 6% Black; 87% had M1 disease; 33% had HPV positive tumors; 63% had prior cetuximab; 29% had an ECOG PS of 0 and 71% had an ECOG PS of 1; and the median number of prior lines of therapy administered for the treatment of HNSCC was 2.
The ORR was 16% (95% CI: 11, 22) with a complete response rate of 5%. The median follow-up time was 8.9 months. Among the 28 responding patients, the median duration of response had not been reached (range: 2.4+ to 27.7+ months), with 23 patients having responses of 6 months or longer. The ORR and duration of response were similar irrespective of dosage regimen (10 mg/kg every 2 weeks or 200 mg every 3 weeks) or HPV status.
Classical Hodgkin Lymphoma
The efficacy of KEYTRUDA was investigated in 210 patients with relapsed or refractory cHL, enrolled in a multicenter, non-randomized, open-label study (KEYNOTE-087; NCT02453594). Patients with active, non-infectious pneumonitis, an allogeneic HSCT within the past 5 years (or greater than 5 years but with symptoms of GVHD), active autoimmune disease, a medical condition that required immunosuppression, or an active infection requiring systemic therapy were ineligible for the trial. Patients received KEYTRUDA at a dose of 200 mg every 3 weeks until unacceptable toxicity or documented disease progression, or for up to 24 months in patients that did not progress. Disease assessment was performed every 12 weeks. The major efficacy outcome measures (ORR, CRR, and duration of response) were assessed by blinded independent central review according to the 2007 revised International Working Group (IWG) criteria.
Among the 210 patients, the baseline characteristics were: median age of 35 years (range: 18 to 76), 9% age 65 or older; 54% male; 88% White; 49% had an ECOG performance status (PS) of 0 and 51% had an ECOG PS of 1. The median number of prior lines of therapy administered for the treatment of cHL was 4 (range: 1 to 12). Fifty-eight percent were refractory to the last prior therapy, including 35% with primary refractory disease and 14% whose disease was chemo-refractory to all prior regimens. Sixty-one percent of patients had undergone prior auto-HSCT, 83% had received prior brentuximab vedotin and 36% of patients had prior radiation therapy.
Efficacy results for KEYNOTE-087 are summarized in Table 22.
Table 22: Efficacy Results in KEYNOTE-087
|
KEYNOTE-087* |
Endpoint |
N=210 |
Overall Response Rate |
|
ORR (95% CI) |
69% (62, 75) |
Complete remission |
22% |
Partial remission |
47% |
Response Duration |
|
Median in months (range) |
11.1 (0.0+, 11.1) † |
* Median follow-up time of 9.4 months
† Based on patients (n=145) with a response by independent review |
Urothelial Carcinoma
Cisplatin Ineligible Patients With Urothelial Carcinoma
The efficacy of KEYTRUDA was investigated in Study KEYNOTE-052 (NCT02335424), a multicenter, open-label, single-arm trial in 370 patients with locally advanced or metastatic urothelial carcinoma who were not eligible for cisplatin-containing chemotherapy. The trial excluded patients with autoimmune disease or a medical condition that required immunosuppression.
Patients received KEYTRUDA 200 mg every 3 weeks until unacceptable toxicity or disease progression. Patients with initial radiographic disease progression could receive additional doses of treatment during confirmation of progression unless disease progression was symptomatic, was rapidly progressive, required urgent intervention, or occurred with a decline in performance status. Patients without disease progression could be treated for up to 24 months. Tumor response assessments were performed at 9 weeks after the first dose, then every 6 weeks for the first year, and then every 12 weeks thereafter. The major efficacy outcome measures were ORR according to RECIST 1.1 as assessed by independent radiology review and duration of response.
In this trial, the median age was 74 years, 77% were male, and 89% were White. Eighty-seven percent had M1 disease, and 13% had M0 disease. Eighty-one percent had a primary tumor in the lower tract, and 19% of patients had a primary tumor in the upper tract. Eighty-five percent of patients had visceral metastases, including 21% with liver metastases. Reasons for cisplatin ineligibility included: 50% with baseline creatinine clearance of <60 mL/min, 32% with ECOG performance status of 2, 9% with ECOG 2
and baseline creatinine clearance of <60 mL/min, and 9% with other reasons (Class III heart failure, Grade 2 or greater peripheral neuropathy, and Grade 2 or greater hearing loss). Ninety percent of patients were treatment naïve, and 10% received prior adjuvant or neoadjuvant platinum-based chemotherapy.
The median follow-up time for 370 patients treated with KEYTRUDA was 7.8 months (range 0.1 to 20 months). Efficacy results are summarized in Table 23.
Table 23: Efficacy Results in KEYNOTE-052
Endpoint |
KEYTRUDA 200 mg every 3 weeks n=370 |
Objective Response Rate |
|
ORR (95% CI) |
29% (24, 34) |
Complete response rate |
7% |
Partial response rate |
22% |
Duration of Response |
|
Median in months (range) |
NR
(1.4+, 17.8+) |
+ Denotes ongoing
NR = not reached |
Previously Treated Urothelial Carcinoma
The efficacy of KEYTRUDA was evaluated in Study KEYNOTE-045 (NCT02256436), a multicenter, randomized (1:1), active-controlled trial in patients with locally advanced or metastatic urothelial carcinoma with disease progression on or after platinum-containing chemotherapy. The trial excluded patients with autoimmune disease or a medical condition that required immunosuppression.
Patients were randomized to receive either KEYTRUDA 200 mg every 3 weeks (n=270) or investigator’s choice of any of the following chemotherapy regimens all given intravenously every 3 weeks (n=272): paclitaxel 175 mg/m2 (n=84), docetaxel 75 mg/m2 (n=84), or vinflunine 320 mg/m2 (n=87). Treatment continued until unacceptable toxicity or disease progression. Patients with initial radiographic disease progression could receive additional doses of treatment during confirmation of progression unless disease progression was symptomatic, was rapidly progressive, required urgent intervention, or occurred with a decline in performance status. Patients without disease progression could be treated for up to 24 months. Assessment of tumor status was performed at 9 weeks after randomization, then every 6 weeks through the first year, followed by every 12 weeks thereafter. The major efficacy outcomes were OS and PFS as assessed by BICR per RECIST 1.1. Additional efficacy outcome measures were ORR as assessed by BICR per RECIST 1.1 and duration of response.
Among the 542 randomized patients, the study population characteristics were: median age 66 years (range: 26 to 88), 58% age 65 or older; 74% male; 72% White and 23% Asian; 42% ECOG status of 0 and 56% ECOG performance status of 1; and 96% M1 disease and 4% M0 disease. Eighty-seven percent of patients had visceral metastases, including 34% with liver metastases. Eighty-six percent had a primary tumor in the lower tract and 14% had a primary tumor in the upper tract. Fifteen percent of patients had disease progression following prior platinum-containing neoadjuvant or adjuvant chemotherapy. Twenty-one percent had received 2 or more prior systemic regimens in the metastatic setting. Seventy-six percent of patients received prior cisplatin, 23% had prior carboplatin, and 1% were treated with other platinum-based regimens.
Table 24 and Figure 5 summarize the key efficacy measures for KEYNOTE-045. The study demonstrated statistically significant improvements in OS and ORR for patients randomized to KEYTRUDA as compared to chemotherapy. There was no statistically significant difference between KEYTRUDA and
chemotherapy with respect to PFS. The median follow-up time for this trial was 9.0 months (range: 0.2 to
20.8 months).
Table 24: Efficacy Results in KEYNOTE-045
|
KEYTRUDA
200 mg every 3 weeks
n=270 |
Chemotherapy
n=272 |
OS |
|
|
Deaths (%) |
155 (57%) |
179 (66%) |
Median in months (95% CI) |
10.3 (8.0, 11.8) |
7.4 (6.1, 8.3 ) |
Hazard ratio* (95% CI) |
0.73 (0.59, 0.91) |
p-Value (stratified log-rank) |
0.004 |
PFS by BICR |
|
|
Events (%) |
218 (81%) |
219 (81%) |
Median in months (95% CI) |
2.1 (2.0, 2.2) |
3.3 (2.3, 3.5) |
Hazard ratio* (95% CI) |
0.98 (0.81, 1.19) |
p-Value (stratified log-rank) |
0.833 |
Objective Response Rate |
|
|
ORR (95% CI) |
21% (16, 27) |
11% (8, 16) |
Complete response rate |
7% |
3% |
Partial response rate |
14% |
8% |
p-Value (Miettinen-Nurminen) |
0.002 |
Median duration of response in months (range) |
NR (1.6+, 15.6+) |
4.3 (1.4+, 15.4+) |
* Hazard ratio (KEYTRUDA compared to chemotherapy) based on the stratified Cox proportional hazard model
+ Denotes ongoing
NR = not reached |
Figure 5: Kaplan-Meier Curve for Overall Survival in KEYNOTE-045
Microsatellite Instability-High Cancer
The efficacy of KEYTRUDA was evaluated in patients with MSI-H or mismatch repair deficient (dMMR), solid tumors enrolled in one of five uncontrolled, open-label, multi-cohort, multi-center, single-arm trials. Patients with active autoimmune disease or a medical condition that required immunosuppression were ineligible across the five trials. Patients received either KEYTRUDA 200 mg every 3 weeks or KEYTRUDA 10 mg/kg every 2 weeks. Treatment continued until unacceptable toxicity or disease progression that was either symptomatic, rapidly progressive, required urgent intervention, or occurred with a decline in performance status. A maximum of 24 months of treatment with KEYTRUDA was administered. For the purpose of assessment of anti-tumor activity across these 5 trials, the major efficacy outcome measures were ORR as assessed by blinded independent central radiologists’ (BICR) review according to RECIST 1.1 and duration of response.
Table 25: MSI-H Trials
Study |
Design and Patient Population |
Number of patients |
MSI-H/dMMR testing |
Dose |
Prior therapy |
KEYNOTE-016
NCT01876511 |
- prospective, investigator-initiated
- 6 sites
- patients with CRC and other tumors
|
28 CRC 30 non-CRC |
local PCR or IHC |
10 mg/kg every 2 weeks |
- CRC: ≥ 2 prior regimens
- Non-CRC: ≥1 prior regimen
|
KEYNOTE-164
NCT02460198 |
- prospective international multi-center
- CRC
|
61 |
local PCR or IHC |
200 mg every 3 weeks |
Prior fluoropyrimidine, oxaliplatin, and irinotecan +/-anti-VEGF/EGFR mAb |
KEYNOTE-012
NCT01848834 |
- retrospectively identified patients with PD-L1-positive gastric, bladder, or triple-negative breast cancer
|
6 |
central PCR |
10 mg/kg every 2 weeks |
≥1 prior regimen |
KEYNOTE-028
NCT02054806 |
- retrospectively identified patients with PD-L1-positive esophageal, biliary, breast, endometrial, or CRC
|
5 |
central PCR |
10 mg/kg every 2 weeks |
≥1 prior regimen |
KEYNOTE-158
NCT02628067 |
- prospective international multi-center enrollment of patients with MSI-H/dMMR non-CRC
- retrospectively identified patients who were enrolled in specific rare tumor non-CRC cohorts
|
19 |
local PCR or IHC (central PCR for patients in rare tumor non-CRC cohorts) |
200 mg every 3 weeks |
≥1 prior regimen |
Total |
|
149 |
|
|
|
CRC = colorectal cancer
PCR = polymerase chain reaction
IHC = immunohistochemistry |
A total of 149 patients with MSI-H or dMMR cancers were identified across the five clinical trials. Among these 149 patients, the baseline characteristics were: median age 55 years (36% age 65 or older); 56% male; 77% White, 19% Asian, 2% Black; and ECOG PS 0 (36%) or 1 (64%). Ninety-eight percent of patients had metastatic disease and 2% had locally advanced, unresectable disease. The median number of prior therapies for metastatic or unresectable disease was two. Eighty-four percent of patients with metastatic CRC and 53% of patients with other solid tumors received two or more prior lines of therapy.
The identification of MSI-H or dMMR tumor status for the majority of patients (135/149) was prospectively determined using local laboratory-developed, polymerase chain reaction (PCR) tests for MSI-H status or immunohistochemistry (IHC) tests for dMMR. Fourteen of the 149 patients were retrospectively identified as MSI-H by testing tumor samples from a total of 415 patients using a central laboratory developed PCR
test. Forty-seven patients had dMMR cancer identified by IHC, 60 had MSI-H identified by PCR, and 42 were identified using both tests.
Efficacy results are summarized in Table 26.
Table 26: Efficacy Results for Patients with MSI-H/dMMR Cancer
Endpoint |
n=149 |
Objective response rate |
|
ORR (95% CI) |
39.6% (31.7, 47.9) |
Complete response rate |
7.4% |
Partial response rate |
32.2% |
Response duration |
|
Median in months (range) |
NR (1.6+, 22.7+) |
% with duration ≥6 months |
78% |
NR = not reached |
Table 27: Response by Tumor Type
|
N |
Objective response rate |
DOR range (months) |
n
(%) |
95% CI |
CRC |
90 |
32 (36%) |
(26%, 46%) |
(1.6+, 22.7+) |
Non-CRC |
59 |
27 (46%) |
(33%, 59%) |
(1.9+, 22.1+) |
Endometrial cancer |
14 |
5 (36%) |
(13%, 65%) |
(4.2+, 17.3+) |
Biliary cancer |
11 |
3 (27%) |
(6%, 61%) |
(11.6+,19.6+) |
Gastric or GE junction cancer
|
9 |
5 (56%) |
(21%, 86%) |
(5.8+, 22.1+) |
Pancreatic cancer |
6 |
5 (83%) |
(36%, 100%) |
(2.6+, 9.2+) |
Small intestinal cancer |
8 |
3 (38%) |
(9%, 76%) |
(1.9+, 9.1+) |
Breast cancer |
2 |
PR, PR |
|
(7.6, 15.9) |
Prostate cancer |
2 |
PR, SD |
|
9.8+ |
Bladder cancer |
1 |
NE |
|
|
Esophageal cancer |
1 |
PR |
|
18.2+ |
Sarcoma |
1 |
PD |
|
|
Thyroid cancer |
1 |
NE |
|
|
Retroperitoneal adenocarcinoma |
1 |
PR |
|
7.5+ |
Small cell lung cancer |
1 |
CR |
|
8.9+ |
Renal cell cancer |
1 |
PD |
|
|
CR = complete response
PR = partial response
SD = stable disease
PD = progressive disease
NE = not evaluable |
Gastric Cancer
The efficacy of KEYTRUDA was investigated in Study KEYNOTE-059 (NCT02335411), a multicenter, non-randomized, open-label multi-cohort trial that enrolled 259 patients with gastric or gastroesophageal junction (GEJ) adenocarcinoma who progressed on at least 2 prior systemic treatments for advanced disease. Previous treatment must have included a fluoropyrimidine and platinum doublet. HER2/neu positive patients must have previously received treatment with approved HER2/neu-targeted therapy. Patients with active autoimmune disease or a medical condition that required immunosuppression or with clinical evidence of ascites by physical exam were ineligible.
Patients received KEYTRUDA 200 mg every 3 weeks until unacceptable toxicity or disease progression that was symptomatic, rapidly progressive, required urgent intervention, occurred with a decline in performance status, or was confirmed at least 4 weeks later with repeat imaging. Patients without disease progression were treated for up to 24 months. Assessment of tumor status was performed every 6 to 9 weeks. The major efficacy outcome measures were ORR according to RECIST 1.1, as assessed by blinded independent central review, and duration of response.
Among the 259 patients, 55% (n = 143) had tumors that expressed PD-L1 with a combined positive score (CPS) of greater than or equal to 1 and microsatellite stable (MSS) tumor status or undetermined MSI or MMR status. PD-L1 status was determined using the PD-L1 IHC 22C3 pharmDx Kit. The baseline characteristics of these 143 patients were: median age 64 years (47% age 65 or older); 77% male; 82% White, 11% Asian; and ECOG PS of 0 (43%) and 1 (57%). Eighty-five percent had M1 disease and 7% had M0 disease. Fifty-one percent had two and 49% had three or more prior lines of therapy in the recurrent or metastatic setting.
For the 143 patients, the ORR was 13.3% (95% CI: 8.2, 20.0); 1.4% had a complete response and 11.9% had a partial response. Among the 19 responding patients, the duration of response ranged from 2.8+ to 19.4+ months, with 11 patients (58%) having responses of 6 months or longer and 5 patients (26%) having responses of 12 months or longer.
Among the 259 patients enrolled in KEYNOTE-059, 7 (3%) had tumors that were determined to be MSI-H. An objective response was observed in 4 patients, including 1 complete response. The duration of response ranged from 5.3+ to 14.1+ months.
Cervical Cancer
KEYTRUDA was investigated in 98 patients with recurrent or metastatic cervical cancer enrolled in a single cohort (Cohort E) in Study KEYNOTE-158 (NCT02628067), a multicenter, non-randomized, open-label, multi-cohort trial. The trial excluded patients with autoimmune disease or a medical condition that required immunosuppression.
Patients were treated with KEYTRUDA intravenously at a dose of 200 mg every 3 weeks until unacceptable toxicity or documented disease progression. Patients with initial radiographic disease progression could receive additional doses of treatment during confirmation of progression unless disease progression was symptomatic, was rapidly progressive, required urgent intervention, or occurred with a decline in performance status. Patients without disease progression could be treated for up to 24 months. Assessment of tumor status was performed every 9 weeks for the first 12 months, and every 12 weeks thereafter. The major efficacy outcome measures were ORR according to RECIST 1.1, as assessed by blinded independent central review, and duration of response.
Among the 98 patients in Cohort E, 77 (79%) had tumors that expressed PD-L1 with a CPS ≥ 1 and received at least one line of chemotherapy in the metastatic setting. PD-L1 status was determined using the PD-L1 IHC 22C3 pharmDx Kit. The baseline characteristics of these 77 patients were: median age was 45 years (range: 27 to 75 years); 81% were White, 14% Asian, 3% Black; ECOG PS was 0 (32%) or 1 (68%); 92% had squamous cell carcinoma, 6% adenocarcinoma, and 1% adenosquamous histology; 95% had M1 disease and 5% had recurrent disease; 35% had one and 65% had two or more prior lines of therapy in the recurrent or metastatic setting.
No responses were observed in patients whose tumors did not have PD-L1 expression (CPS ?1).
Efficacy results are summarized in Table 28.
Table 28: Efficacy Results in Patients with Recurrent or Metastatic Cervical Cancer (CPS ≥1) in
KEYNOTE-158
Endpoint |
n=77* |
Objective response rate |
|
ORR (95% CI) |
14.3% (7.4, 24.1) |
Complete response rate |
2.6% |
Partial response rate |
11.7% |
Response duration |
|
Median in months (range) |
NR (4.1, 18.6+)† |
% with duration ≥6 months |
91% |
* Median follow-up time of 11.7 months (range 0.6 to 22.7 months)
† Based on patients (n=11) with a response by independent review
+ Denotes ongoing
NR = not reached |