Enter drug's generic or brand name below. Results will appear here. Note: all drug related information obtained on this page is provided by RX List.
Using the RX LIST database:
(1) Enter the drug name in the search box below and hit ENTER
(2) The rx list web site will open here with the drug search completed. Next, scroll down the page to locate the link to the drug you are searching for and then click on the link.
WARNING
LACTIC ACIDOSIS
Lactic acidosis is a rare, but serious complication that can occur due to metformin accumulation. The risk increases with conditions such as sepsis, dehydration, excess alcohol intake, hepatic impairment, renal impairment, and acute congestive heart failure.
The onset is often subtle, accompanied only by nonspecific symptoms such as malaise, myalgias, respiratory distress, increasing somnolence, and nonspecific abdominal distress.
Laboratory abnormalities include low pH, increased anion gap and elevated blood lactate.
If acidosis is suspected, JANUMET should be discontinued and the patient hospitalized immediately. [See WARNINGS AND PRECAUTIONS]
JANUMET (sitagliptin and metformin HCl) tablets contain two oral antihyperglycemic drugs used in the management of type 2 diabetes: sitagliptin and metformin hydrochloride.
Sitagliptin is an orally-active inhibitor of the dipeptidyl peptidase-4 (DPP-4) enzyme. Sitagliptin is present in JANUMET tablets in the form of sitagliptin phosphate monohydrate. Sitagliptin phosphate monohydrate is described chemically as 7-[(3R)-3-amino-1-oxo-4-(2,4,5-trifluorophenyl)butyl]-5,6,7,8tetrahydro-3-(trifluoromethyl)-1,2,4-triazolo[4,3-a]pyrazine phosphate (1:1) monohydrate with an empirical formula of C16H15F6N5O•H3PO4•H2O and a molecular weight of 523.32. The structural formula is:
 |
Sitagliptin phosphate monohydrate is a white to off-white, crystalline, non-hygroscopic powder. It is soluble in water and N,N-dimethyl formamide; slightly soluble in methanol; very slightly soluble in ethanol, acetone, and acetonitrile; and insoluble in isopropanol and isopropyl acetate.
Metformin hydrochloride (N,N-dimethylimidodicarbonimidic diamide hydrochloride) is not chemically or pharmacologically related to any other classes of oral antihyperglycemic agents. Metformin hydrochloride is a white to off-white crystalline compound with a molecular formula of C4H11N5•HCl and a molecular weight of 165.63. Metformin hydrochloride is freely soluble in water and is practically insoluble in acetone, ether, and chloroform. The pKa of metformin is 12.4. The pH of a 1% aqueous solution of metformin hydrochloride is 6.68. The structural formula is as shown:
 |
JANUMET is available for oral administration as tablets containing 64.25 mg sitagliptin phosphate monohydrate and metformin hydrochloride equivalent to: 50 mg sitagliptin as free base and 500 mg metformin hydrochloride (JANUMET 50 mg/500 mg) or 1000 mg metformin hydrochloride (JANUMET 50 mg/1000 mg). Each film-coated tablet of JANUMET contains the following inactive ingredients: microcrystalline cellulose, polyvinylpyrrolidone, sodium lauryl sulfate, and sodium stearyl fumarate. In addition, the film coating contains the following inactive ingredients: polyvinyl alcohol, polyethylene glycol, talc, titanium dioxide, red iron oxide, and black iron oxide.
JANUMET is indicated as an adjunct to diet and exercise to improve glycemic control in adults with type 2 diabetes mellitus.
JANUMET should not be used in patients with type 1 diabetes mellitus.
JANUMET has not been studied in patients with a history of pancreatitis. It is unknown whether patients with a history of pancreatitis are at increased risk for the development of pancreatitis while using JANUMET. [see WARNINGS AND PRECAUTIONS]
Discontinue JANUMET at the time of, or prior to, an iodinated contrast imaging procedure in patients with an eGFR between 30 and 60 mL/min/1.73 m2; in patients with a history of liver disease, alcoholism, or heart failure; or in patients who will be administered intra-arterial iodinated contrast. Re-evaluate eGFR 48 hours after the imaging procedure; restart JANUMET if renal function is stable [see WARNINGS AND PRECAUTIONS].
Tablets:
Tablets supplied as follows:
| Contents | Description | How Supplied | NDC |
| 50 mg sitagliptin and 500 mg metformin HCl | light pink, capsuleshaped, film-coated tablets with “575” debossed on one side | unit-of-use bottles of 60 | NDC 0006-0575-61 |
| unit-of-use bottles of 180 | NDC 0006-0575-62 | ||
| bulk bottles of 1000 | NDC 0006-0575-82 | ||
| 50 mg sitagliptin and 1000 mg metformin HCl | red, capsule-shaped, film-coated tablets with “577” debossed on one side | unit-of-use bottles of 60 | NDC 0006-0577-61 |
| unit-of-use bottles of 180 | NDC 0006-0577-62 | ||
| bulk bottles of 1000 | NDC 0006-0577-82 |
Store at 20-25°C (68-77°F), excursions permitted to 15-30°C (59-86°F). [See USP Controlled Room Temperature.]
Distributed by MERCK & CO., INC., Whitehouse Station, NJ 08889, USA. Revised: Jul 2022.
The following adverse reactions are also discussed elsewhere in the labeling:
Because clinical trials are conducted under widely varying conditions, adverse reaction rates observed in the clinical trials of a drug cannot be directly compared to rates in the clinical trials of another drug and may not reflect the rates observed in practice.
Table 1 summarizes the most common (≥5% of patients) adverse reactions reported (regardless of investigator assessment of causality) in a 24-week placebo-controlled factorial study in which sitagliptin and metformin were coadministered to patients with type 2 diabetes inadequately controlled on diet and exercise.
Table 1: Sitagliptin and Metformin Coadministered to Patients with Type 2 Diabetes Inadequately Controlled on Diet and Exercise: Adverse Reactions Reported (Regardless of Investigator Assessment of Causality) in ≥5% of Patients Receiving Combination Therapy (and Greater than in Patients Receiving Placebo)*
| Number of Patients (%) | ||||
| Placebo | Sitagliptin 100 mg once daily | Metformin HCl 500 mg/ Metformin HCl 1000 mg twice daily† | Sitagliptin 50 mg twice daily + Metformin HCl 500 mg/ Metformin HCl 1000 mg twice daily† | |
| N = 176 | N = 178 | N = 364† | N = 372† | |
| Diarrhea | 7 (4.0) | 5 (2.8) | 28 (7.7) | 28 (7.5) |
| Upper Respiratory Tract Infection | 9 (5.1) | 8 (4.5) | 19 (5.2) | 23 (6.2) |
| Headache | 5 (2.8) | (1.1) | 14 (3.8) | 22 (5.9) |
| * Intent-to-treat population. † Data pooled for the patients given the lower and higher doses of metformin. |
||||
In a 24-week placebo-controlled trial of sitagliptin 100 mg administered once daily added to a twice daily metformin regimen, there were no adverse reactions reported regardless of investigator assessment of causality in ≥5% of patients and more commonly than in patients given placebo. Discontinuation of therapy due to clinical adverse reactions was similar to the placebo treatment group (sitagliptin and metformin, 1.9%; placebo and metformin, 2.5%).
The incidences of pre-selected gastrointestinal adverse experiences in patients treated with sitagliptin and metformin were similar to those reported for patients treated with metformin alone. See Table 2.
Table 2: Pre-selected Gastrointestinal Adverse Reactions (Regardless of Investigator Assessment of Causality) Reported in Patients with Type 2 Diabetes Receiving Sitagliptin and Metformin
| Number of Patients (%) | ||||||
| Study of Sitagliptin and Metformin in Patients Inadequately Controlled on Diet and Exercise | Study of Sitagliptin Add-on in Patients Inadequately Controlled on Metformin Alone | |||||
| Placebo | Sitagliptin 100 mg once daily | Metformin HCl 500 mg/ Metformin HCl 1000 mg twice daily* | Sitagliptin 50 mg twice daily + Metformin HCl 500 mg/ Metformin HCl 1000 mg twice daily* | Placebo and Metformin HCl ≥1500 mg daily | Sitagliptin 100 mg once daily and Metformin HCl ≥1500 mg daily | |
| N = 176 | N = 179 | N = 364 | N = 372 | N = 237 | N = 464 | |
| Diarrhea | 7 (4.0) | 5 (2.8) | 28 (7.7) | 28 (7.5) | 6 (2.5) | 11 (2.4) |
| Nausea | 2 (1.1) | 2 (1.1) | 20 (5.5) | 18 (4.8) | 2 (0.8) | 6 (1.3) |
| Vomiting | 1 (0.6) | 0 (0.0) | 2 (0.5) | 8 (2.2) | 2 (0.8) | 5 (1.1) |
| Abdominal Pain† | 4 (2.3) | 6 (3.4) | 14 (3.8) | 11 (3.0) | 9 (3.8) | 10 (2.2) |
| * Data pooled for the patients given the lower and higher doses of metformin. † Abdominal discomfort was included in the analysis of abdominal pain in the study of initial therapy. |
||||||
In a 24-week placebo-controlled study of sitagliptin 100 mg as add-on therapy in patients with type 2 diabetes inadequately controlled on metformin and glimepiride (sitagliptin, N=116; placebo, N=113), the adverse reactions reported regardless of investigator assessment of causality in ≥5% of patients treated with sitagliptin and more commonly than in patients treated with placebo were: hypoglycemia (Table 3) and headache (6.9%, 2.7%).
In a placebo-controlled study of sitagliptin 100 mg as add-on therapy in patients with type 2 diabetes inadequately controlled on metformin and rosiglitazone (sitagliptin, N=181; placebo, N=97), the adverse reactions reported regardless of investigator assessment of causality through Week 18 in ≥5% of patients treated with sitagliptin and more commonly than in patients treated with placebo were: upper respiratory tract infection (sitagliptin, 5.5%; placebo, 5.2%) and nasopharyngitis (6.1%, 4.1%). Through Week 54, the adverse reactions reported regardless of investigator assessment of causality in ≥5% of patients treated with sitagliptin and more commonly than in patients treated with placebo were: upper respiratory tract infection (sitagliptin, 15.5%; placebo, 6.2%), nasopharyngitis (11.0%, 9.3%), peripheral edema (8.3%, 5.2%), and headache (5.5%, 4.1%).
In a 24-week placebo-controlled study of sitagliptin 100 mg as add-on therapy in patients with type 2 diabetes inadequately controlled on metformin and insulin (sitagliptin, N=229; placebo, N=233), the only adverse reaction reported regardless of investigator assessment of causality in ≥5% of patients treated with sitagliptin and more commonly than in patients treated with placebo was hypoglycemia (Table 3).
In the above studies (N=5), adverse reactions of hypoglycemia were based on all reports of symptomatic hypoglycemia; a concurrent glucose measurement was not required although most (77%) reports of hypoglycemia were accompanied by a blood glucose measurement ≤70 mg/dL. When the combination of sitagliptin and metformin was coadministered with a sulfonylurea or with insulin, the percentage of patients reporting at least one adverse reaction of hypoglycemia was higher than that observed with placebo and metformin coadministered with a sulfonylurea or with insulin (Table 3).
Table 3: Incidence and Rate of Hypoglycemia* (Regardless of Investigator Assessment of Causality) in Placebo-Controlled Clinical Studies of Sitagliptin in Combination with Metformin Coadministered with Glimepiride or Insulin
| Add-On to Glimepiride + Metformin (24 weeks) | Sitagliptin 100 mg + Metformin + Glimepiride | Placebo + Metformin + Glimepiride |
| N = 116 | N = 113 | |
| Overall (%) | 19 (16.4) | 1 (0.9) |
| Rate (episodes/patient-year)† | 0.82 | 0.02 |
| Severe (%)‡ | 0 (0.0) | 0 (0.0) |
| Add-On to Insulin + Metformin (24 weeks) | Sitagliptin 100 mg + Metformin + Insulin | Placebo + Metformin + Insulin |
| N = 229 | N = 233 | |
| Overall (%) | 35 (15.3) | 19 (8.2) |
| Rate (episodes/patient-year)† | 0.98 | 0.61 |
| Severe (%)‡ | 1 (0.4) | 1 (0.4) |
| * Adverse reactions of hypoglycemia were based on all reports of symptomatic hypoglycemia; a concurrent glucose measurement was not required: Intent-to-treat population. † Based on total number of events (i.e., a single patient may have had multiple events). ‡ Severe events of hypoglycemia were defined as those events requiring medical assistance or exhibiting depressed level/loss of consciousness or seizure. |
||
The overall incidence of reported adverse reactions of hypoglycemia in patients with type 2 diabetes inadequately controlled on diet and exercise was 0.6% in patients given placebo, 0.6% in patients given sitagliptin alone, 0.8% in patients given metformin alone, and 1.6% in patients given sitagliptin in combination with metformin. In patients with type 2 diabetes inadequately controlled on metformin alone, the overall incidence of adverse reactions of hypoglycemia was 1.3% in patients given add-on sitagliptin and 2.1% in patients given add-on placebo.
In the study of sitagliptin and add-on combination therapy with metformin and rosiglitazone, the overall incidence of hypoglycemia was 2.2% in patients given add-on sitagliptin and 0.0% in patients given add-on placebo through Week 18. Through Week 54, the overall incidence of hypoglycemia was 3.9% in patients given add-on sitagliptin and 1.0% in patients given add-on placebo.
In an additional, 30-week placebo-controlled, study of patients with type 2 diabetes inadequately controlled with metformin comparing the maintenance of sitagliptin 100 mg versus withdrawal of sitagliptin when initiating basal insulin therapy, the event rate and incidence of documented symptomatic hypoglycemia (blood glucose measurement ≤70 mg/dL) did not differ between the sitagliptin and placebo groups.
With the combination of sitagliptin and metformin, no clinically meaningful changes in vital signs or in ECG (including in QTc interval) were observed.
In a pooled analysis of 19 double-blind clinical trials that included data from 10,246 patients randomized to receive sitagliptin 100 mg/day (N=5429) or corresponding (active or placebo) control (N=4817), the incidence of acute pancreatitis was 0.1 per 100 patient-years in each group (4 patients with an event in 4708 patient-years for sitagliptin and 4 patients with an event in 3942 patient-years for control).
The most common adverse experience in sitagliptin monotherapy reported regardless of investigator assessment of causality in ≥5% of patients and more commonly than in patients given placebo was nasopharyngitis.
The most common (>5%) established adverse reactions due to initiation of metformin therapy are diarrhea, nausea/vomiting, flatulence, abdominal discomfort, indigestion, asthenia, and headache.
The incidence of laboratory adverse reactions was similar in patients treated with sitagliptin and metformin (7.6%) compared to patients treated with placebo and metformin (8.7%). In most but not all studies, a small increase in white blood cell count (approximately 200 cells/microL difference in WBC vs placebo; mean baseline WBC approximately 6600 cells/microL) was observed due to a small increase in neutrophils. This change in laboratory parameters is not considered to be clinically relevant.
In controlled clinical trials of metformin of 29 weeks duration, a decrease to subnormal levels of previously normal serum vitamin B12 levels, without clinical manifestations, was observed in approximately 7% of patients. Such decrease, possibly due to interference with B12 absorption from the B12-intrinsic factor complex, is, however, very rarely associated with anemia and appears to be rapidly reversible with discontinuation of metformin or vitamin B12 supplementation.
Additional adverse reactions have been identified during postapproval use of JANUMET, sitagliptin, or metformin. Because these reactions are reported voluntarily from a population of uncertain size, it is generally not possible to reliably estimate their frequency or establish a causal relationship to drug exposure.
Hypersensitivity reactions including anaphylaxis, angioedema, rash, urticaria, cutaneous vasculitis, and exfoliative skin conditions including Stevens-Johnson syndrome; upper respiratory tract infection; hepatic enzyme elevations; acute pancreatitis, including fatal and non-fatal hemorrhagic and necrotizing pancreatitis [see INDICATIONS]; worsening renal function, including acute renal failure (sometimes requiring dialysis) and tubulointerstitial nephritis; severe and disabling arthralgia; bullous pemphigoid; constipation; vomiting; headache; myalgia; pain in extremity; back pain; pruritus; mouth ulceration; stomatitis; cholestatic, hepatocellular, and mixed hepatocellular liver injury; rhabdomyolysis.
Table 4 presents clinically significant drug interactions with JANUMET:
Table 4: Clinically Significant Drug Interactions with JANUMET
| Carbonic Anhydrase Inhibitors | |
| Clinical Impact: | Carbonic anhydrase inhibitors frequently cause a decrease in serum bicarbonate and induce non-anion gap, hyperchloremic metabolic acidosis. Concomitant use of these drugs with JANUMET may increase the risk for lactic acidosis. |
| Intervention: | Consider more frequent monitoring of these patients. |
| Examples: | Topiramate, zonisamide, acetazolamide or dichlorphenamide. |
| Drugs that Reduce Metformin Clearance | |
| Clinical Impact: | Concomitant use of drugs that interfere with common renal tubular transport systems involved in the renal elimination of metformin (e.g., organic cationic transporter-2 [OCT2] / multidrug and toxin extrusion [MATE] inhibitors) could increase systemic exposure to metformin and may increase the risk for lactic acidosis [see CLINICAL PHARMACOLOGY ]. |
| Intervention: | Consider the benefits and risks of concomitant use with JANUMET. |
| Examples: | Ranolazine, vandetanib, dolutegravir, and cimetidine. |
| Alcohol | |
| Clinical Impact: | Alcohol is known to potentiate the effect of metformin on lactate metabolism. |
| Intervention: | Warn patients against alcohol intake while receiving JANUMET. |
| Insulin Secretagogues or Insulin | |
| Clinical Impact: | Coadministration of JANUMET with an insulin secretagogue (e.g., sulfonylurea) or insulin may increase the risk of hypoglycemia. |
| Intervention: | Patients receiving an insulin secretagogue or insulin may require lower doses of the insulin secretagogue or insulin. |
| Drugs Affecting Glycemic Control | |
| Clinical Impact: | Certain drugs tend to produce hyperglycemia and may lead to loss of glycemic control. |
| Intervention: | When such drugs are administered to a patient receiving JANUMET, observe the patient closely for loss of blood glucose control. When such drugs are withdrawn from a patient receiving JANUMET, observe the patient closely for hypoglycemia. |
| Examples: | Thiazides and other diuretics, corticosteroids, phenothiazines, thyroid products, estrogens, oral contraceptives, phenytoin, nicotinic acid, sympathomimetics, calcium channel blockers, and isoniazid. |
Included as part of the "PRECAUTIONS" Section
There have been postmarketing cases of metformin-associated lactic acidosis, including fatal cases. These cases had a subtle onset and were accompanied by nonspecific symptoms such as malaise, myalgias, abdominal pain, respiratory distress, or increased somnolence; however, hypothermia, hypotension and resistant bradyarrhythmias have occurred with severe acidosis. Metformin-associated lactic acidosis was characterized by elevated blood lactate concentrations (>5 mmol/Liter), anion gap acidosis (without evidence of ketonuria or ketonemia), and an increased lactate/pyruvate ratio; metformin plasma levels were generally >5 mcg/mL. Metformin decreases liver uptake of lactate increasing lactate blood levels which may increase the risk of lactic acidosis, especially in patients at risk.
If metformin-associated lactic acidosis is suspected, general supportive measures should be instituted promptly in a hospital setting, along with immediate discontinuation of JANUMET. In JANUMETtreated patients with a diagnosis or strong suspicion of lactic acidosis, prompt hemodialysis is recommended to correct the acidosis and remove accumulated metformin (metformin HCl is dialyzable, with a clearance of up to 170 mL/min under good hemodynamic conditions). Hemodialysis has often resulted in reversal of symptoms and recovery.
Educate patients and their families about the symptoms of lactic acidosis and if these symptoms occur instruct them to discontinue JANUMET and report these symptoms to their health care provider.
For each of the known and possible risk factors for metformin-associated lactic acidosis, recommendations to reduce the risk of and manage metformin-associated lactic acidosis are provided below:
The postmarketing metformin-associated lactic acidosis cases primarily occurred in patients with significant renal impairment. The risk of metformin accumulation and metformin-associated lactic acidosis increases with the severity of renal impairment because metformin is substantially excreted by the kidney. Clinical recommendations based upon the patient’s renal function include [see DOSAGE AND ADMINISTRATION and CLINICAL PHARMACOLOGY]:
The concomitant use of JANUMET with specific drugs may increase the risk of metformin-associated lactic acidosis: those that impair renal function, result in significant hemodynamic change, interfere with acid-base balance or increase metformin accumulation [see DRUG INTERACTIONS]. Therefore, consider more frequent monitoring of patients.
The risk of metformin-associated lactic acidosis increases with the patient’s age because elderly patients have a greater likelihood of having hepatic, renal, or cardiac impairment than younger patients. Assess renal function more frequently in elderly patients [see Use In Specific Populations].
Administration of intravascular iodinated contrast agents in metformin-treated patients has led to an acute decrease in renal function and the occurrence of lactic acidosis. Stop JANUMET at the time of, or prior to, an iodinated contrast imaging procedure in patients with an eGFR between 30 and 60 mL/min/1.73 m2; in patients with a history of hepatic impairment, alcoholism, or heart failure; or in patients who will be administered intra-arterial iodinated contrast. Re-evaluate eGFR 48 hours after the imaging procedure, and restart JANUMET if renal function is stable.
Withholding of food and fluids during surgical or other procedures may increase the risk for volume depletion, hypotension and renal impairment. JANUMET should be temporarily discontinued while patients have restricted food and fluid intake.
Several of the postmarketing cases of metformin-associated lactic acidosis occurred in the setting of acute congestive heart failure (particularly when accompanied by hypoperfusion and hypoxemia). Cardiovascular collapse (shock), acute myocardial infarction, sepsis, and other conditions associated with hypoxemia have been associated with lactic acidosis and may also cause prerenal azotemia. When such events occur, discontinue JANUMET.
Alcohol potentiates the effect of metformin on lactate metabolism and this may increase the risk of metformin-associated lactic acidosis. Warn patients against excessive alcohol intake while receiving JANUMET.
Patients with hepatic impairment have developed with cases of metformin-associated lactic acidosis. This may be due to impaired lactate clearance resulting in higher lactate blood levels. Therefore, avoid use of JANUMET in patients with clinical or laboratory evidence of hepatic disease.
There have been postmarketing reports of acute pancreatitis, including fatal and non-fatal hemorrhagic or necrotizing pancreatitis, in patients taking JANUMET. After initiation of JANUMET, patients should be observed carefully for signs and symptoms of pancreatitis. If pancreatitis is suspected, JANUMET should promptly be discontinued and appropriate management should be initiated. It is unknown whether patients with a history of pancreatitis are at increased risk for the development of pancreatitis while using JANUMET.
An association between dipeptidyl peptidase-4 (DPP-4) inhibitor treatment and heart failure has been observed in cardiovascular outcomes trials for two other members of the DPP-4 inhibitor class. These trials evaluated patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus and atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease.Consider the risks and benefits of JANUMET prior to initiating treatment in patients at risk for heart failure, such as those with a prior history of heart failure and a history of renal impairment, and observe these patients for signs and symptoms of heart failure during therapy. Advise patients of the characteristic symptoms of heart failure and to immediately report such symptoms. If heart failure develops, evaluate and manage according to current standards of care and consider discontinuation of JANUMET.
There have been postmarketing reports of worsening renal function, including acute renal failure, sometimes requiring dialysis. Before initiation of therapy with JANUMET and at least annually thereafter, renal function should be assessed. In patients in whom development of renal dysfunction is anticipated, particularly in elderly patients, renal function should be assessed more frequently and JANUMET discontinued if evidence of renal impairment is present. JANUMET is contraindicated in patients with severe renal impairment [see CONTRAINDICATIONS and Lactic Acidosis].
In controlled clinical trials of metformin of 29 weeks duration, a decrease to subnormal levels of previously normal serum vitamin B12 levels was observed in approximately 7% of patients. Such decrease, possibly due to interference with B12 absorption from the B12-intrinsic factor complex, may be associated with anemia but appears to be rapidly reversible with discontinuation of metformin or vitamin B12 supplementation. Certain individuals (those with inadequate vitamin B12 or calcium intake or absorption) appear to be predisposed to developing subnormal vitamin B12 levels. Measure hematologic parameters on an annual basis and vitamin B12 measurements at 2- to 3-year intervals in patients on JANUMET and manage any abnormalities [see ADVERSE REACTIONS].
JANUMET may increase the risk of hypoglycemia when combined with insulin and/or an insulin secretagogue (e.g., sulfonylurea) [see ADVERSE REACTIONS]. A lower dose of insulin or insulin secretagogue may be required to minimize the risk of hypoglycemia when used in combination with JANUMET [see DRUG INTERACTIONS].
There have been postmarketing reports of serious hypersensitivity reactions in patients treated with sitagliptin, one of the components of JANUMET. These reactions include anaphylaxis, angioedema, and exfoliative skin conditions including Stevens-Johnson syndrome. Onset of these reactions occurred within the first 3 months after initiation of treatment with sitagliptin, with some reports occurring after the first dose.
If a hypersensitivity reaction is suspected, discontinue JANUMET, assess for other potential causes for the event, and institute alternative treatment for diabetes. [See ADVERSE REACTIONS]
Angioedema has also been reported with other DPP-4 inhibitors. Use caution in a patient with a history of angioedema with another DPP-4 inhibitor because it is unknown whether such patients will be predisposed to angioedema with JANUMET.
There have been postmarketing reports of severe and disabling arthralgia in patients taking DPP-4 inhibitors. The time to onset of symptoms following initiation of drug therapy varied from one day to years. Patients experienced relief of symptoms upon discontinuation of the medication. A subset of patients experienced a recurrence of symptoms when restarting the same drug or a different DPP-4 inhibitor. Consider DPP-4 inhibitors as a possible cause for severe joint pain and discontinue drug if appropriate.
Postmarketing cases of bullous pemphigoid requiring hospitalization have been reported with DPP- 4 inhibitor use. In reported cases, patients typically recovered with topical or systemic immunosuppressive treatment and discontinuation of the DPP-4 inhibitor. Tell patients to report development of blisters or erosions while receiving JANUMET. If bullous pemphigoid is suspected, JANUMET should be discontinued and referral to a dermatologist should be considered for diagnosis and appropriate treatment.
Advise the patient to read the FDA-approved patient labeling (PATIENT INFORMATION).
Explain the risks of lactic acidosis, its symptoms, and conditions that predispose to its development. Advise patients to discontinue JANUMET immediately and to promptly notify their healthcare provider if unexplained hyperventilation, myalgias, malaise, unusual somnolence or other nonspecific symptoms occur. Counsel patients against excessive alcohol intake and inform patients about the importance of regular testing of renal function while receiving JANUMET. Instruct patients to inform their doctor that they are taking JANUMET prior to any surgical or radiological procedure, as temporary discontinuation may be required [see WARNINGS AND PRECAUTIONS].
Inform patients that acute pancreatitis has been reported during postmarketing use of JANUMET. Inform patients that persistent severe abdominal pain, sometimes radiating to the back, which may or may not be accompanied by vomiting, is the hallmark symptom of acute pancreatitis. Instruct patients to promptly discontinue JANUMET and contact their physician if persistent severe abdominal pain occurs [see WARNINGS AND PRECAUTIONS].
Inform patients of the signs and symptoms of heart failure. Before initiating JANUMET, ask patients about a history of heart failure or other risk factors for heart failure including moderate to severe renal impairment. Instruct patients to contact their health care provider as soon as possible if they experience symptoms of heart failure, including increasing shortness of breath, rapid increase in weight or swelling of the feet [see WARNINGS AND PRECAUTIONS].
Inform patients about the importance of regular monitoring of hematological parameters while receiving JANUMET [see WARNINGS AND PRECAUTIONS].
Inform patients that the incidence of hypoglycemia is increased when JANUMET is added to an insulin secretagogue (e.g., sulfonylurea) or insulin therapy. Explain to patients receiving JANUMET in combination with these medications the risks of hypoglycemia, its symptoms and treatment, and conditions that predispose to its development [see WARNINGS AND PRECAUTIONS].
Inform patients that allergic reactions have been reported during postmarketing use of sitagliptin, one of the components of JANUMET. If symptoms of allergic reactions (including rash, hives, and swelling of the face, lips, tongue, and throat that may cause difficulty in breathing or swallowing) occur, patients must stop taking JANUMET and seek medical advice promptly.
Inform patients that severe and disabling joint pain may occur with this class of drugs. The time to onset of symptoms can range from one day to years. Instruct patients to seek medical advice if severe joint pain occurs [see WARNINGS AND PRECAUTIONS].
Inform patients that bullous pemphigoid may occur with this class of drugs. Instruct patients to seek medical advice if blisters or erosions occur [see WARNINGS AND PRECAUTIONS].
Inform females that treatment with JANUMET may result in ovulation in some premenopausal anovulatory women which may lead to unintended pregnancy [see Use In Specific Populations].
Inform patients that the tablets must never be split or divided before swallowing.
No animal studies have been conducted with the combined products in JANUMET to evaluate carcinogenesis, mutagenesis or impairment of fertility. The following data are based on the findings in studies with sitagliptin and metformin individually.
A two-year carcinogenicity study was conducted in male and female rats given oral doses of sitagliptin of 50, 150, and 500 mg/kg/day. There was an increased incidence of combined liver adenoma/carcinoma in males and females and of liver carcinoma in females at 500 mg/kg. This dose results in exposures approximately 60 times the human exposure at the maximum recommended daily adult human dose (MRHD) of 100 mg/day based on AUC comparisons. Liver tumors were not observed at 150 mg/kg, approximately 20 times the human exposure at the MRHD. A two-year carcinogenicity study was conducted in male and female mice given oral doses of sitagliptin of 50, 125, 250, and 500 mg/kg/day. There was no increase in the incidence of tumors in any organ up to 500 mg/kg, approximately 70 times human exposure at the MRHD. Sitagliptin was not mutagenic or clastogenic with or without metabolic activation in the Ames bacterial mutagenicity assay, a Chinese hamster ovary (CHO) chromosome aberration assay, an in vitro cytogenetics assay in CHO, an in vitro rat hepatocyte DNA alkaline elution assay, and an in vivo micronucleus assay.
In rat fertility studies with oral gavage doses of 125, 250, and 1000 mg/kg, males were treated for 4 weeks prior to mating, during mating, up to scheduled termination (approximately 8 weeks total), and females were treated 2 weeks prior to mating through gestation day 7. No adverse effect on fertility was observed at 125 mg/kg (approximately 12 times human exposure at the MRHD of 100 mg/day based on AUC comparisons). At higher doses, nondose-related increased resorptions in females were observed (approximately 25 and 100 times human exposure at the MRHD based on AUC comparison).
Long-term carcinogenicity studies have been performed in rats (dosing duration of 104 weeks) and mice (dosing duration of 91 weeks) at doses up to and including 900 mg/kg/day and 1500 mg/kg/day, respectively. These doses are both approximately four times the maximum recommended human daily dose of 2000 mg based on body surface area comparisons. No evidence of carcinogenicity with metformin was found in either male or female mice. Similarly, there was no tumorigenic potential observed with metformin in male rats. There was, however, an increased incidence of benign stromal uterine polyps in female rats treated with 900 mg/kg/day.
There was no evidence of a mutagenic potential of metformin in the following in vitro tests: Ames test (S. typhimurium), gene mutation test (mouse lymphoma cells), or chromosomal aberrations test (human lymphocytes). Results in the in vivo mouse micronucleus test were also negative. Fertility of male or female rats was unaffected by metformin when administered at doses as high as 600 mg/kg/day, which is approximately three times the maximum recommended human daily dose based on body surface area comparisons.
The limited available data with JANUMET in pregnant women are not sufficient to inform a drugassociated risk for major birth defects and miscarriage. Published studies with metformin use during pregnancy have not reported a clear association with metformin and major birth defect or miscarriage risk [see Data]. There are risks to the mother and fetus associated with poorly controlled diabetes in pregnancy [see Clinical Considerations]. No adverse developmental effects were observed when sitagliptin was administered to pregnant rats and rabbits during organogenesis at oral doses up to 30-times and 20-times, respectively, the 100 mg clinical dose, based on AUC. No adverse developmental effects were observed when metformin was administered to pregnant Sprague Dawley rats and rabbits during organogenesis at doses up to 2- and 6-times, respectively, a 2000 mg clinical dose, based on body surface area [see Data].
The estimated background risk of major birth defects is 6-10% in women with pre-gestational diabetes with a Hemoglobin A1c >7% and has been reported to be as high as 20-25% in women with a Hemoglobin A1c >10%. In the U.S. general population, the estimated background risk of major birth defects and miscarriage in clinically recognized pregnancies is 2-4% and 15-20% respectively.
Disease-Associated Maternal and/or Embryo/Fetal Risk
Poorly controlled diabetes in pregnancy increases the maternal risk for diabetic ketoacidosis, preeclampsia, spontaneous abortions, preterm delivery, and delivery complications. Poorly controlled diabetes increases the fetal risk for major birth defects, still birth, and macrosomia related morbidity.
Human Data
Published data from post-marketing studies do not report a clear association with metformin and major birth defects, miscarriage, or adverse maternal or fetal outcomes when metformin is used during pregnancy. However, these studies cannot definitely establish the absence of any risk because of methodological limitations, including small sample size and inconsistent comparator groups.
Animal Data
Sitagliptin and Metformin
No animal reproduction studies were conducted with the coadministration of sitagliptin and metformin.
Sitagliptin
In embryo-fetal development studies, sitagliptin administered to pregnant rats and rabbits during organogenesis (gestation day 6 to 20) did not adversely affect developmental outcomes at oral doses up to 250 mg/kg (30-times the 100 mg clinical dose) and 125 mg/kg (20-times the 100 mg clinical dose), respectively, based on AUC. Higher doses in rats associated with maternal toxicity increased the incidence of rib malformations in offspring at 1000 mg/kg, or approximately 100-times the clinical dose, based on AUC. Placental transfer of sitagliptin was observed in pregnant rats and rabbits.
Sitagliptin administered to female rats from gestation day 6 to lactation day 21 caused no functional or behavioral toxicity in offspring of rats at doses up to 1000 mg/kg.
Metformin
Metformin did not cause adverse developmental effects when administered to pregnant Sprague Dawley rats and rabbits up to 600 mg/kg/day during the period of organogenesis. This represents an exposure of about 2- and 6-times a 2000 mg clinical dose based on body surface area (mg/m2) for rats and rabbits, respectively.
There is no information regarding the presence of JANUMET in human milk, the effects on the breastfed infant, or the effects on milk production. Limited published studies report that metformin is present in human milk [see Data]. There are no reports of adverse effects on breastfed infants exposed to metformin. There is no information on the effects of metformin on milk production. Sitagliptin is present in rat milk and therefore possibly present in human milk [see Data]. The developmental and health benefits of breastfeeding should be considered along with the mother’s clinical need for JANUMET and any potential adverse effects on the breastfed infant from JANUMET or from the underlying maternal condition.
Sitagliptin
Sitagliptin is secreted in the milk of lactating rats at a milk to plasma ratio of 4:1.
Metformin
Published clinical lactation studies report that metformin is present in human milk, which resulted in infant doses approximately 0.11% to 1% of the maternal weight-adjusted dosage and a milk/plasma ratio ranging between 0.13 and 1. However, the studies were not designed to definitely establish the risk of use of metformin during lactation because of small sample size and limited adverse event data collected in infants.
Discuss the potential for unintended pregnancy with premenopausal women as therapy with metformin may result in ovulation in some anovulatory women.
The safety and effectiveness of JANUMET have not been established in pediatric patients.
Three 20-week double-blind, placebo-controlled studies each with 34-week extensions were conducted to evaluate the efficacy and safety of sitagliptin in 410 pediatric patients aged 10 to 17 years with inadequately controlled type 2 diabetes, with or without insulin therapy (HbA1c 6.5-10% for patients not on insulin, HbA1c 7-10% for patients on insulin). At study entry, patients in study 1 were not treated with oral antihyperglycemic agents; patients in studies 2 and 3 were on maximally tolerated metformin therapy. The primary efficacy endpoint was the change from baseline in HbA1c after 20 weeks of therapy. The pre-specified primary efficacy analyses included data from study 1 and pooled data from studies 2 and 3, regardless of glycemic rescue or treatment discontinuation.
In both efficacy analyses, the effect of treatment with sitagliptin was not significantly different from placebo. In study 1, the mean baseline HbA1c was 7.5%, and 12% of patients were on insulin therapy. At week 20, the change from baseline in HbA1c in patients treated with sitagliptin (N=95) was 0.06% compared to 0.23% in patients treated with placebo (N=95), a difference of -0.17% (95% CI: -0.62, 0.28). In studies 2 and 3, the mean baseline HbA1c was 8.0%, 15% of patients were on insulin and 72% were on metformin HCl doses of greater than 1,500 mg daily. At week 20, the change from baseline in HbA1c in patients treated with sitagliptin (N=107) was -0.23% compared to 0.09% in patients treated with placebo (N=113), a difference of -0.33% (95% CI: -0.70, 0.05).
In general, dose selection for an elderly patient should be cautious, usually starting at the low end of the dosing range, reflecting the greater frequency of decreased hepatic, renal, or cardiac function, and of concomitant disease or other drug therapy and the higher risk of lactic acidosis. Renal function should be assessed more frequently in elderly patients. [see CONTRAINDICATIONS; WARNINGS AND PRECAUTIONS) and CLINICAL PHARMACOLOGY]
Of the total number of subjects (N=3884) in clinical studies of sitagliptin, 725 patients were 65 years and over, while 61 patients were 75 years and over. No overall differences in safety or effectiveness were observed between subjects 65 years and over and younger subjects. While this and other reported clinical experience have not identified differences in responses between the elderly and younger patients, greater sensitivity of some older individuals cannot be ruled out.
Controlled clinical studies of metformin did not include sufficient numbers of elderly patients to determine whether they respond differently from younger patients, although other reported clinical experience has not identified differences in responses between the elderly and young patients.
JANUMET is not recommended in patients with an eGFR between 30 and less than 45 mL/min/1.73 m2 because these patients require a lower dosage of sitagliptin than what is available in the fixed dose combination JANUMET product. JANUMET is contraindicated in severe renal impairment, patients with an eGFR below 30 mL/min/1.73 m2. [see DOSAGE AND ADMINISTRATION, CONTRAINDICATIONS, WARNINGS AND PRECAUTIONS and CLINICAL PHARMACOLOGY]
Sitagliptin is excreted by the kidney, and sitagliptin exposure is increased in patients with renal impairment. [see CLINICAL PHARMACOLOGY]
Metformin is substantially excreted by the kidney, and the risk of metformin accumulation and lactic acidosis increases with the degree of renal impairment.
Use of metformin in patients with hepatic impairment has been associated with some cases of lactic acidosis. JANUMET is not recommended in patients with hepatic impairment. [see WARNINGS AND PRECAUTIONS.]
In the event of overdose with JANUMET, contact the Poison Control Center. In the event of an overdose, it is reasonable to employ supportive measures, e.g., remove unabsorbed material from the gastrointestinal tract, employ clinical monitoring (including obtaining an electrocardiogram), and institute supportive therapy as indicated by the patient's clinical status.
Sitagliptin is modestly dialyzable. In clinical studies, approximately 13.5% of the dose was removed over a 3- to 4-hour hemodialysis session. Prolonged hemodialysis may be considered if clinically appropriate. It is not known if sitagliptin is dialyzable by peritoneal dialysis.Overdose of metformin has occurred, including ingestion of amounts greater than 50 grams. Hypoglycemia was reported in approximately 10% of cases, but no causal association with metformin has been established. Lactic acidosis has been reported in approximately 32% of metformin overdose cases [see WARNINGS AND PRECAUTIONS]. Metformin is dialyzable with a clearance of up to 170 mL/min under good hemodynamic conditions. Therefore, hemodialysis may be useful for removal of accumulated drug from patients in whom metformin overdosage is suspected.
JANUMET is contraindicated in patients with:
JANUMET combines two antihyperglycemic agents with complementary mechanisms of action to improve glycemic control in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus: sitagliptin, a dipeptidyl peptidase-4 (DPP- 4) inhibitor, and metformin HCl, a member of the biguanide class.
Sitagliptin is a DPP-4 inhibitor, which is believed to exert its actions in patients with type 2 diabetes by slowing the inactivation of incretin hormones. Concentrations of the active intact hormones are increased by sitagliptin, thereby increasing and prolonging the action of these hormones. Incretin hormones, including glucagon-like peptide-1 (GLP-1) and glucose-dependent insulinotropic polypeptide (GIP), are released by the intestine throughout the day, and levels are increased in response to a meal. These hormones are rapidly inactivated by the enzyme DPP-4. The incretins are part of an endogenous system involved in the physiologic regulation of glucose homeostasis. When blood glucose concentrations are normal or elevated, GLP-1 and GIP increase insulin synthesis and release from pancreatic beta cells by intracellular signaling pathways involving cyclic AMP. GLP-1 also lowers glucagon secretion from pancreatic alpha cells, leading to reduced hepatic glucose production. By increasing and prolonging active incretin levels, sitagliptin increases insulin release and decreases glucagon levels in the circulation in a glucose-dependent manner. Sitagliptin demonstrates selectivity for DPP-4 and does not inhibit DPP-8 or DPP-9 activity in vitro at concentrations approximating those from therapeutic doses.
Metformin is an antihyperglycemic agent which improves glucose tolerance in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus, lowering both basal and postprandial plasma glucose. Metformin decreases hepatic glucose production, decreases intestinal absorption of glucose, and improves insulin sensitivity by increasing peripheral glucose uptake and utilization. With metformin therapy, insulin secretion remains unchanged while fasting insulin levels and day-long plasma insulin response may decrease.
In patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus, administration of sitagliptin led to inhibition of DPP-4 enzyme activity for a 24-hour period. After an oral glucose load or a meal, this DPP-4 inhibition resulted in a 2- to 3-fold increase in circulating levels of active GLP-1 and GIP, decreased glucagon concentrations, and increased responsiveness of insulin release to glucose, resulting in higher C-peptide and insulin concentrations. The rise in insulin with the decrease in glucagon was associated with lower fasting glucose concentrations and reduced glucose excursion following an oral glucose load or a meal.
In studies with healthy subjects, sitagliptin did not lower blood glucose or cause hypoglycemia.
In a two-day study in healthy subjects, sitagliptin alone increased active GLP-1 concentrations, whereas metformin alone increased active and total GLP-1 concentrations to similar extents. Coadministration of sitagliptin and metformin had an additive effect on active GLP-1 concentrations. Sitagliptin, but not metformin, increased active GIP concentrations. It is unclear what these findings mean for changes in glycemic control in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus.
In a randomized, placebo-controlled crossover study, 79 healthy subjects were administered a single oral dose of sitagliptin 100 mg, sitagliptin 800 mg (8 times the recommended dose), and placebo. At the recommended dose of 100 mg, there was no effect on the QTc interval obtained at the peak plasma concentration, or at any other time during the study. Following the 800-mg dose, the maximum increase in the placebo-corrected mean change in QTc from baseline at 3 hours postdose was 8.0 msec. This increase is not considered to be clinically significant. At the 800-mg dose, peak sitagliptin plasma concentrations were approximately 11 times higher than the peak concentrations following a 100-mg dose.
In patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus administered sitagliptin 100 mg (N=81) or sitagliptin 200 mg (N=63) daily, there were no meaningful changes in QTc interval based on ECG data obtained at the time of expected peak plasma concentration.
The pharmacokinetics of sitagliptin have been extensively characterized in healthy subjects and patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus. Following a single oral 100-mg dose to healthy volunteers, mean plasma AUC of sitagliptin was 8.52 µM•hr, Cmax was 950 nM, and apparent terminal half-life (t1/2) was 12.4 hours. Plasma AUC of sitagliptin increased in a dose-proportional manner and increased approximately 14% following 100 mg doses at steady-state compared to the first dose. The intra-subject and inter-subject coefficients of variation for sitagliptin AUC were small (5.8% and 15.1%). The pharmacokinetics of sitagliptin was generally similar in healthy subjects and in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus.
Sitagliptin
After oral administration of a 100 mg dose to healthy subjects, sitagliptin was rapidly absorbed with peak plasma concentrations (median Tmax) occurring 1 to 4 hours postdose. The absolute bioavailability of sitagliptin is approximately 87%.
Effect of Food
Coadministration of a high-fat meal with sitagliptin had no effect on the pharmacokinetics of sitagliptin.
Metformin
The absolute bioavailability of a metformin HCl 500-mg tablet given under fasting conditions is approximately 50-60%. Studies using single oral doses of metformin HCl tablets 500 mg to 1,500 mg, and 850 mg to 2,550 mg (approximately 1.3 times the maximum recommended daily dosage), indicate that there is a lack of dose proportionality with increasing doses, which is due to decreased absorption rather than an alteration in elimination.
Effect of Food
Food decreases the extent of and slightly delays the absorption of metformin, as shown by approximately a 40% lower mean peak plasma concentration (Cmax), a 25% lower area under the plasma concentration versus time curve (AUC), and a 35-minute prolongation of time to peak plasma concentration (Tmax) following administration of a single 850-mg tablet of metformin HCl with food, compared to the same tablet strength administered fasting. The clinical relevance of these decreases is unknown.
Sitagliptin
The mean volume of distribution at steady state following a single 100-mg intravenous dose of sitagliptin to healthy subjects is approximately 198 liters. The fraction of sitagliptin reversibly bound to plasma proteins is low (38%).
Metformin
The apparent volume of distribution (V/F) of metformin following single oral doses of metformin HCl tablets 850 mg averaged 654 ± 358 L. Metformin is negligibly bound to plasma proteins, in contrast to sulfonylureas, which are more than 90% protein bound. Metformin partitions into erythrocytes, most likely as a function of time. At usual clinical doses and dosing schedules of metformin HCl tablets, steady-state plasma concentrations of metformin are reached within 24-48 hours and are generally <1 mcg/mL.
Sitagliptin
Approximately 79% of sitagliptin is excreted unchanged in the urine with metabolism being a minor pathway of elimination. The apparent terminal t1/2 following a 100 mg oral dose of sitagliptin was approximately 12.4 hours and renal clearance was approximately 350 mL/min.
Metformin
Following oral administration, approximately 90% of the absorbed drug is eliminated via the renal route within the first 24 hours, with a plasma elimination half-life of approximately 6.2 hours. In blood, the elimination half-life is approximately 17.6 hours, suggesting that the erythrocyte mass may be a compartment of distribution.
Sitagliptin
Following a [14C]sitagliptin oral dose, approximately 16% of the radioactivity was excreted as metabolites of sitagliptin. Six metabolites were detected at trace levels and are not expected to contribute to the plasma DPP-4 inhibitory activity of sitagliptin. In vitro studies indicated that the primary enzyme responsible for the limited metabolism of sitagliptin was CYP3A4, with contribution from CYP2C8.
Metformin
Intravenous single-dose studies in normal subjects demonstrate that metformin is excreted unchanged in the urine and does not undergo hepatic metabolism (no metabolites have been identified in humans) nor biliary excretion.
Sitagliptin
Following administration of an oral [14C]sitagliptin dose to healthy subjects, approximately 100% of the administered radioactivity was eliminated in feces (13%) or urine (87%) within one week of dosing. Elimination of sitagliptin occurs primarily via renal excretion and involves active tubular secretion.
Sitagliptin is a substrate for human organic anion transporter-3 (hOAT-3), which may be involved in the renal elimination of sitagliptin. The clinical relevance of hOAT-3 in sitagliptin transport has not been established. Sitagliptin is also a substrate of p-glycoprotein (P-gp), which may also be involved in mediating the renal elimination of sitagliptin. However, cyclosporine, a P-gp inhibitor, did not reduce the renal clearance of sitagliptin.
Metformin
Elimination of metformin occurs primarily via renal excretion. Renal clearance is approximately 3.5 times greater than creatinine clearance, which indicates that tubular secretion is the major route of metformin elimination.
JANUMET
Studies characterizing the pharmacokinetics of sitagliptin and metformin after administration of JANUMET in renally impaired patients have not been performed [see DOSAGE AND ADMINISTRATION].
Sitagliptin
An approximately 2-fold increase in the plasma AUC of sitagliptin was observed in patients with moderate renal impairment with eGFR of 30 to less than 45 mL/min/1.73 m2, and an approximately 4-fold increase was observed in patients with severe renal impairment including patients with end-stage renal disease (ESRD) on hemodialysis, as compared to normal healthy control subjects. [see DOSAGE AND ADMINISTRATION]
Metformin
In patients with decreased renal function, the plasma and blood half-life of metformin is prolonged and the renal clearance is decreased [see CONTRAINDICATIONS and WARNINGS AND PRECAUTIONS].
JANUMET
Studies characterizing the pharmacokinetics of sitagliptin and metformin after administration of JANUMET in patients with hepatic impairment have not been performed.
Sitagliptin
In patients with moderate hepatic impairment (Child-Pugh score 7 to 9), mean AUC and Cmax of sitagliptin increased approximately 21% and 13%, respectively, compared to healthy matched controls following administration of a single 100-mg dose of sitagliptin. These differences are not considered to be clinically meaningful. There is no clinical experience in patients with severe hepatic impairment (Child-Pugh score >9) [see Use In Specific Populations].
Metformin
No pharmacokinetic studies of metformin have been conducted in patients with hepatic impairment.
Sitagliptin
Based on a population pharmacokinetic analysis or a composite analysis of available pharmacokinetic data, BMI, gender, and race do not have a clinically meaningful effect on the pharmacokinetics of sitagliptin. When the effects of age on renal function are taken into account, age alone did not have a clinically meaningful impact on the pharmacokinetics of sitagliptin based on a population pharmacokinetic analysis. Elderly subjects (65 to 80 years) had approximately 19% higher plasma concentrations of sitagliptin compared to younger subjects.
Metformin
Limited data from controlled pharmacokinetic studies of metformin in healthy elderly subjects suggest that total plasma clearance of metformin is decreased, the half-life is prolonged, and Cmax is increased, compared to healthy young subjects. From these data, it appears that the change in metformin pharmacokinetics with aging is primarily accounted for by a change in renal function.
Metformin pharmacokinetic parameters did not differ significantly between normal subjects and patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus when analyzed according to gender. Similarly, in controlled clinical studies in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus, the antihyperglycemic effect of metformin was comparable in males and females.
No studies of metformin pharmacokinetic parameters according to race have been performed. In controlled clinical studies of metformin in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus, the antihyperglycemic effect was comparable in Whites (n=249), Blacks (n=51), and Hispanics (n=24).
Coadministration of multiple doses of sitagliptin (50 mg) and metformin HCl (1000 mg) given twice daily did not meaningfully alter the pharmacokinetics of either sitagliptin or metformin in patients with type 2 diabetes.
Pharmacokinetic drug interaction studies with JANUMET have not been performed; however, such studies have been conducted with the individual components of JANUMET (sitagliptin and metformin HCl).
In Vitro Assessment of Drug Interactions
Sitagliptin is not an inhibitor of CYP isozymes CYP3A4, 2C8, 2C9, 2D6, 1A2, 2C19 or 2B6, and is not an inducer of CYP3A4. Sitagliptin is a P-gp substrate but does not inhibit P-gp mediated transport of digoxin. Based on these results, sitagliptin is considered unlikely to cause interactions with other drugs that utilize these pathways.
Sitagliptin is not extensively bound to plasma proteins. Therefore, the propensity of sitagliptin to be involved in clinically meaningful drug-drug interactions mediated by plasma protein binding displacement is very low.
In Vivo Assessment of Drug Interactions
Effects of Sitagliptin on Other Drugs
In clinical studies, sitagliptin did not meaningfully alter the pharmacokinetics of metformin, glyburide, simvastatin, rosiglitazone, digoxin, warfarin, or an oral contraception (ethinyl estradiol and norethindrone) (Table 5), providing in vivo evidence of a low propensity for causing drug interactions with substrates of CYP3A4, CYP2C8, CYP2C9, P-gp, and organic cationic transporter (OCT).
Table 5: Effect of Sitagliptin on Systemic Exposure of Coadministered Drugs
| Coadministered Drug | Dose of Coadministered Drug* | Dose of Sitagliptin* | Geometric Mean Ratio (ratio with/without sitagliptin) No Effect = 1.00 |
||
| AUC† | Cmax | ||||
| Digoxin | 0.25 mg‡ once daily for 10 days | 100 mg‡ once daily for 10 days | Digoxin | 1.11§ | 1.18 |
| Glyburide | 1.25 mg | 200 mg‡ once daily for 6 days | Glyburide | 1.09 | 1.01 |
| Simvastatin | 20 mg | 200 mg‡ once daily for 5 days | Simvastatin | 0.85¶ | 0.80 |
| Simvastatin Acid | 1.12¶ | 1.06 | |||
| Rosiglitazone | 0.98 | 0.99 | |||
| Rosiglitazone | 4 mg | 200 mg‡ once daily for 5 days | Rosiglitazone | 0.98 | 0.99 |
| Warfarin | 30 mg single dose on day 5 | 200 mg‡ once daily for 11 days | S(-) Warfarin | 0.95 | 0.89 |
| R(+) Warfarin | 0.99 | 0.89 | |||
| Ethinyl estradiol and norethindrone | 21 days once daily of 35 μg ethinyl estradiol with norethindrone 0.5 mg x 7 days, 0.75 mg x 7 days, 1.0 mg x 7 days | 200 mg‡ once daily for 21 days | Ethinyl estradiol | 0.99 | 0.97 |
| Norethindrone | 1.03 | 0.98 | |||
| Metformin HCl | 1000 mg‡ twice daily for 14 days | 50 mg‡ twice daily for 7 days | Metformin | 1.02# | 0.97 |
| * All doses administered as single dose unless otherwise specified. † AUC is reported as AUC0-∞ unless otherwise specified. ‡ Multiple dose. § AUC0-24hr. ¶ AUC0-last. # AUC0-12hr. |
|||||
Effects of Other Drugs on Sitagliptin
Clinical data described below suggest that sitagliptin is not susceptible to clinically meaningful interactions by coadministered medications (Table 6).
Table 6: Effect of Coadministered Drugs on Systemic Exposure of Sitagliptin
| Coadministered Drug | Dose of Coadministered Drug* | Dose of Sitagliptin* | Geometric Mean Ratio (ratio with/without coadministered drug) No Effect = 1.00 |
||
| AUC† | Cmax | ||||
| Cyclosporine | 600 mg once daily | 100 mg once daily | Sitagliptin | 1.29 | 1.68 |
| Metformin HCl | 1000 mg‡ twice daily for 14 days | 50 mg‡ twice daily for 7 days | Sitagliptin | 1.02§ | 1.05 |
| * All doses administered as single dose unless otherwise specified. † AUC is reported as AUC0-∞ unless otherwise specified. ‡ Multiple dose. § AUC0-12hr. |
|||||
Table 7: Effect of Metformin HCl on Systemic Exposure of Coadministered Drugs
| Coadministered Drug | Dose of Coadministered Drug* | Dose of Metformin HCl* | Geometric Mean Ratio (ratio with/without metformin) No Effect = 1.00 |
||
| AUC† | Cmax | ||||
| Cimetidine | 400 mg | 850 mg | Cimetidine | 0.95‡ | 1.01 |
| Glyburide | 5 mg | 500 mg§ | Glyburide | 0.78¶ | 0.63¶ |
| Furosemide | 40 mg | 850 mg | Furosemide | 0.87¶ | 0.69¶ |
| Nifedipine | 10 mg | 850 mg | Nifedipine | 1.10‡ | 1.08 |
| Propranolol | 40 mg | 850 mg | Propranolol | 1.01‡ | 0.94 |
| Ibuprofen | 400 mg | 850 mg | Ibuprofen | 0.97# | 1.01# |
| * All doses administered as single dose unless otherwise specified. † AUC is reported as AUC0-∞ unless otherwise specified. ‡ AUC0-24hr. § GLUMETZA (metformin HCl extended-release tablets) 500 mg. ¶ Ratio of arithmetic means, p value of difference <0.05. # Ratio of arithmetic means. |
|||||
Table 8: Effect of Coadministered Drugs on Systemic Exposure of Metformin HCl
| Coadministered Drug | Dose of Coadministered Drug* | Dose of Metformin HCl* | Geometric Mean Ratio (ratio with/without coadministered drug) No Effect = 1.00 |
||
| AUC† | Cmax | ||||
| Glyburide | 5 mg | 500 mg‡ | Metformin‡ | 0.98§ | 0.99§ |
| Furosemide | 40 mg | 850 mg | Metformin | 1.09§ | 1.22§ |
| Nifedipine | 10 mg | 850 mg | Metformin | 1.16 | 1.21 |
| Propranolol | 40 mg | 850 mg | Metformin | 0.90 | 0.94 |
| Ibuprofen | 400 mg | 850 mg | Metformin | 1.05§ | 1.07§ |
| Drugs that are eliminated by renal tubular secretion may increase the accumulation of metformin. [See WARNINGS AND PRECAUTIONS and DRUG INTERACTIONS.] | |||||
| Cimetidine | 400 mg | 850 mg | Metformin | 1.40 | 1.61 |
| Carbonic anhydrase inhibitors may cause metabolic acidosis. [See WARNINGS AND PRECAUTIONS and DRUG INTERACTIONS.] | |||||
| Topiramate | 100 mg¶ | 500 mg¶ | Metformin | 1.25¶ | 1.17 |
| * All doses administered as single dose unless otherwise specified. † AUC is reported as AUC0-∞ unless otherwise specified. ‡ GLUMETZA (metformin HCl extended-release tablets) 500 mg. § Ratio of arithmetic means. ¶ Steady state 100 mg Topiramate every 12 hr + metformin HCl 500 mg every 12 hr AUC = AUC0-12hr. |
|||||
The coadministration of sitagliptin and metformin has been studied in patients with type 2 diabetes inadequately controlled on diet and exercise and in combination with other antihyperglycemic agents. None of the clinical efficacy studies described below was conducted with JANUMET; however, bioequivalence of JANUMET with coadministered sitagliptin and metformin HCl tablets was demonstrated.
A total of 1091 patients with type 2 diabetes and inadequate glycemic control on diet and exercise participated in a 24-week, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled factorial study designed to assess the efficacy of sitagliptin and metformin coadministration. Patients on an antihyperglycemic agent (N=541) underwent a diet, exercise, and drug washout period of up to 12 weeks duration. After the washout period, patients with inadequate glycemic control (A1C 7.5% to 11%) were randomized after completing a 2-week single-blind placebo run-in period. Patients not on antihyperglycemic agents at study entry (N=550) with inadequate glycemic control (A1C 7.5% to 11%) immediately entered the 2-week single-blind placebo run-in period and then were randomized. Approximately equal numbers of patients were randomized to receive placebo, 100 mg of sitagliptin once daily, 500 mg or 1000 mg of metformin HCl twice daily, or 50 mg of sitagliptin twice daily in combination with 500 mg or 1000 mg of metformin HCl twice daily. Patients who failed to meet specific glycemic goals during the study were treated with glyburide (glibenclamide) rescue.
Sitagliptin and metformin coadministration provided significant improvements in A1C, FPG, and 2- hour PPG compared to placebo, to metformin alone, and to sitagliptin alone (Table 9, Figure 1). Mean reductions from baseline in A1C were generally greater for patients with higher baseline A1C values. For patients not on an antihyperglycemic agent at study entry, mean reductions from baseline in A1C were: sitagliptin 100 mg once daily, -1.1%; metformin HCl 500 mg bid, -1.1%; metformin HCl 1000 mg bid, -1.2%; sitagliptin 50 mg bid with metformin HCl 500 mg bid, -1.6%; sitagliptin 50 mg bid with metformin HCl 1000 mg bid, -1.9%; and for patients receiving placebo, -0.2%. Lipid effects were generally neutral. The decrease in body weight in the groups given sitagliptin in combination with metformin was similar to that in the groups given metformin alone or placebo.
Table 9: Glycemic Parameters at Final Visit (24-Week Study) for Sitagliptin and Metformin, Alone and in Combination in Patients with Type 2 Diabetes Inadequately Controlled on Diet and Exercise*
| Placebo | Sitagliptin 100 mg once daily | Metformin HCl 500 mg twice daily | Metformin HCl 1000 mg twice daily | Sitagliptin 50 mg twice daily + Metformin HCl 500 mg twice daily | Sitagliptin 50 mg twice daily + Metformin HCl 1000 mg twice daily | |
| A1C (%) | N = 165 | N = 175 | N = 178 | N = 177 | N = 183 | N = 178 |
| Baseline (mean) | 8.7 | 8.9 | 8.9 | 8.7 | 8.8 | 8.8 |
| Change from baseline (adjusted mean†) | 0.2 | -0.7 | -0.8 | -1.1 | -1.4 | -1.9 |
| Difference from placebo (adjusted mean†) (95% CI) |
-0.8‡ (-1.1, -0.6) |
-1.0‡ (-1.2, -0.8) |
-1.3‡ (-1.5, -1.1) |
-1.6‡ (-1.8, -1.3) |
-2.1‡ (-2.3, -1.8) |
|
| Patients (%) achieving A1C <7% | 15 (9%) | 35 (20%) | 41 (23%) | 68 (38%) | 79 (43%) | 118 (66%) |
| % Patients receiving rescue medication | 32 | 21 | 17 | 12 | 8 | 2 |
| FPG (mg/dL) | N = 169 | N = 178 | N = 179 | N = 179 | N = 183 | N = 180 |
| Baseline (mean) | 196 | 201 | 205 | 197 | 204 | 197 |
| Change from baseline (adjusted mean†) | 6 | -17 | -27 | -29 | -47 | -64 |
| Difference from placebo (adjusted mean†) (95% CI) |
-23‡ (-33, -14) |
-33‡ (-43, -24) |
-35‡ (-45, -26) |
-53‡ (-62, -43) |
-70‡ (-79, -60) |
|
| 2-hour PPG (mg/dL) | N = 129 | N = 136 | N = 141 | N = 138 | N = 147 | N = 152 |
| Baseline (mean) | 277 | 285 | 293 | 283 | 292 | 287 |
| Change from baseline (adjusted mean†) | 0 | -52 | -53 | -78 | -93 | -117 |
| Difference from placebo (adjusted mean†) (95% CI) |
-52‡ (-67, -37) |
-54‡ (-69, -39) |
-78‡ (-93, -63) |
-93‡ (-107, -78) |
-117‡ (-131, -102) |
|
| * Intent-to-treat population using last observation on study prior to glyburide (glibenclamide) rescue therapy. † Least squares means adjusted for prior antihyperglycemic therapy status and baseline value. ‡ p<0.001 compared to placebo. |
||||||
Figure 1: Mean Change from Baseline for A1C (%) over 24 Weeks with Sitagliptin and Metformin, Alone and in Combination in Patients with Type 2 Diabetes Inadequately Controlled with Diet and Exercise*
 |
| * All Patients Treated Population: least squares means adjusted for prior antihyperglycemic therapy and baseline value. |
Initial combination therapy or maintenance of combination therapy should be individualized and are left to the discretion of the health care provider.
A total of 701 patients with type 2 diabetes participated in a 24-week, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study designed to assess the efficacy of sitagliptin in combination with metformin. Patients already on metformin (N=431) at a dose of at least 1500 mg per day were randomized after completing a 2-week, single-blind placebo run-in period. Patients on metformin and another antihyperglycemic agent (N=229) and patients not on any antihyperglycemic agents (off therapy for at least 8 weeks, N=41) were randomized after a run-in period of approximately 10 weeks on metformin HCl (at a dose of at least 1500 mg per day) in monotherapy. Patients were randomized to the addition of either 100 mg of sitagliptin or placebo, administered once daily. Patients who failed to meet specific glycemic goals during the studies were treated with pioglitazone rescue.
In combination with metformin, sitagliptin provided significant improvements in A1C, FPG, and 2-hour PPG compared to placebo with metformin (Table 10). Rescue glycemic therapy was used in 5% of patients treated with sitagliptin 100 mg and 14% of patients treated with placebo. A similar decrease in body weight was observed for both treatment groups.
Table 10: Glycemic Parameters at Final Visit (24-Week Study) of Sitagliptin as Add-on Combination Therapy with Metformin*
| Sitagliptin 100 mg once daily + Metformin | Placebo + Metformin | |
| A1C (%) | N = 453 | N = 224 |
| Baseline (mean) | 8.0 | 8.0 |
| Change from baseline (adjusted mean†) | -0.7 | -0.0 |
| Difference from placebo + metformin (adjusted mean†) (95% CI) |
-0.7 ‡ (-0.8, -0.5) |
|
| Patients (%) achieving A1C <7% | 213 (47%) | 41 (18%) |
| FPG (mg/dL) | N = 454 | N = 226 |
| Baseline (mean) | 170 | 174 |
| Change from baseline (adjusted mean†) | -17 | 9 |
| Difference from placebo + metformin (adjusted mean†) (95% CI) |
-25‡ (-31, -20) |
|
| 2-hour PPG (mg/dL) | N = 387 | N = 182 |
| Baseline (mean) | 275 | 272 |
| Change from baseline (adjusted mean†) | -62 | -11 |
| Difference from placebo + metformin (adjusted mean†) (95% CI) |
-51 ‡ (-61, -41) |
|
| * Intent-to-treat population using last observation on study prior to pioglitazone rescue therapy. † Least squares means adjusted for prior antihyperglycemic therapy and baseline value. ‡ p<0.001 compared to placebo + metformin. |
||
Sitagliptin Add-on Therapy in Patients with Type 2 Diabetes Inadequately Controlled on the Combination of Metformin and Glimepiride
A total of 441 patients with type 2 diabetes participated in a 24-week, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study designed to assess the efficacy of sitagliptin in combination with glimepiride, with or without metformin. Patients entered a run-in treatment period on glimepiride (≥4 mg per day) alone or glimepiride in combination with metformin HCl (≥1500 mg per day). After a dose-titration and dose-stable run-in period of up to 16 weeks and a 2-week placebo run-in period, patients with inadequate glycemic control (A1C 7.5% to 10.5%) were randomized to the addition of either 100 mg of sitagliptin or placebo, administered once daily. Patients who failed to meet specific glycemic goals during the studies were treated with pioglitazone rescue.
Patients receiving sitagliptin with metformin and glimepiride had significant improvements in A1C and FPG compared to patients receiving placebo with metformin and glimepiride (Table 11), with mean reductions from baseline relative to placebo in A1C of -0.9% and in FPG of -21 mg/dL. Rescue therapy was used in 8% of patients treated with add-on sitagliptin 100 mg and 29% of patients treated with add-on placebo. The patients treated with add-on sitagliptin had a mean increase in body weight of 1.1 kg vs. addon placebo (+0.4 kg vs. -0.7 kg). In addition, add-on sitagliptin resulted in an increased rate of hypoglycemia compared to add-on placebo. [see WARNINGS AND PRECAUTIONS; ADVERSE REACTIONS]
Table 11: Glycemic Parameters at Final Visit (24-Week Study) for Sitagliptin in Combination with Metformin and Glimepiride*
| Sitagliptin 100 mg + Metformin and Glimepiride | Placebo + Metformin and Glimepiride | |
| A1C (%) | N = 115 | N = 105 |
| Baseline (mean) | 8.3 | 8.3 |
| Change from baseline (adjusted mean†) | -0.6 | 0.3 |
| Difference from placebo (adjusted mean†) (95% CI) | -0.9 ‡ (-1.1, -0.7) |
|
| Patients (%) achieving A1C <7% | 26 (23%) | 1 (1%) |
| FPG (mg/dL) | N = 115 | N = 109 |
| Baseline (mean) | 179 | 179 |
| Change from baseline (adjusted mean†) | -8 | 13 |
| Difference from placebo (adjusted mean†) (95% CI) | -21‡ (-32, -10) |
|
| * Intent-to-treat population using last observation on study prior to pioglitazone rescue therapy. † Least squares means adjusted for prior antihyperglycemic therapy status and baseline value. ‡ p<0.001 compared to placebo. |
||
A total of 278 patients with type 2 diabetes participated in a 54-week, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study designed to assess the efficacy of sitagliptin in combination with metformin and rosiglitazone. Patients on dual therapy with metformin HCl ≥1500 mg/day and rosiglitazone ≥4 mg/day or with metformin HCl ≥1500 mg/day and pioglitazone ≥30 mg/day (switched to rosiglitazone ≥4 mg/day) entered a dose-stable run-in period of 6 weeks. Patients on other dual therapy were switched to metformin HCl ≥1500 mg/day and rosiglitazone ≥4 mg/day in a dose titration/stabilization run-in period of up to 20 weeks in duration. After the run-in period, patients with inadequate glycemic control (A1C 7.5% to 11%) were randomized 2:1 to the addition of either 100 mg of sitagliptin or placebo, administered once daily. Patients who failed to meet specific glycemic goals during the studies were treated with glipizide (or other sulfonylurea) rescue. The primary time point for evaluation of glycemic parameters was Week 18.
In combination with metformin and rosiglitazone, sitagliptin provided significant improvements in A1C, FPG, and 2-hour PPG compared to placebo with metformin and rosiglitazone (Table 12) at Week 18. At Week 54, mean reduction in A1C was -1.0% for patients treated with sitagliptin and -0.3% for patients treated with placebo in an analysis based on the intent-to-treat population. Rescue therapy was used in 18% of patients treated with sitagliptin 100 mg and 40% of patients treated with placebo. There was no significant difference between sitagliptin and placebo in body weight change.
Table 12: Glycemic Parameters at Week 18 for Sitagliptin in Add-on Combination Therapy with Metformin and Rosiglitazone*
| Sitagliptin 100 mg + Metformin + Rosiglitazone | Placebo + Metformin + Rosiglitazone | |
| A1C (%) | N = 176 | N = 93 |
| Baseline (mean) | 8.8 | 8.7 |
| Change from baseline (adjusted mean†) | -1.0 | -0.4 |
| Difference from placebo + rosiglitazone + metformin (adjusted mean†) (95% CI) | -0.7 ‡ (-0.9,-0.4) |
|
| Patients (%) achieving A1C <7% | 39 (22%) | 9 (10%) |
| FPG (mg/dL) | N = 179 | N = 94 |
| Baseline (mean) | 181 | 182 |
| Change from baseline (adjusted mean†) | -30 | -11 |
| Difference from placebo + rosiglitazone + metformin (adjusted mean†) (95% CI) | -18 ‡ (-26, -10) |
|
| 2-hour PPG (mg/dL) | N = 152 | N = 80 |
| Baseline (mean) | 256 | 248 |
| Change from baseline (adjusted mean†) | -59 | -21 |
| Difference from placebo + rosiglitazone + metformin (adjusted mean†) (95% CI) | -39‡ (-51, -26) |
|
| * Intent-to-treat population using last observation on study prior to glipizide (or other sulfonylurea) rescue therapy. † Least squares means adjusted for prior antihyperglycemic therapy status and baseline value. ‡ p<0.001 compared to placebo + metformin + rosiglitazone. |
||
A total of 641 patients with type 2 diabetes participated in a 24-week, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study designed to assess the efficacy of sitagliptin as add-on to insulin therapy. Approximately 75% of patients were also taking metformin. Patients entered a 2-week, single-blind run-in treatment period on pre-mixed, long-acting, or intermediate-acting insulin, with or without metformin HCl (≥1500 mg per day). Patients using short-acting insulins were excluded unless the short-acting insulin was administered as part of a pre-mixed insulin. After the run-in period, patients with inadequate glycemic control (A1C 7.5% to 11%) were randomized to the addition of either 100 mg of sitagliptin (N=229) or placebo (N=233), administered once daily. Patients were on a stable dose of insulin prior to enrollment with no changes in insulin dose permitted during the run-in period. Patients who failed to meet specific glycemic goals during the double-blind treatment period were to have uptitration of the background insulin dose as rescue therapy.
Among patients also receiving metformin, the median daily insulin (pre-mixed, intermediate or long acting) dose at baseline was 40 units in the sitagliptin-treated patients and 42 units in the placebo-treated patients. The median change from baseline in daily dose of insulin was zero for both groups at the end of the study. Patients receiving sitagliptin with metformin and insulin had significant improvements in A1C, FPG and 2-hour PPG compared to patients receiving placebo with metformin and insulin (Table 13). The adjusted mean change from baseline in body weight was -0.3 kg in patients receiving sitagliptin with metformin and insulin and -0.2 kg in patients receiving placebo with metformin and insulin. There was an increased rate of hypoglycemia in patients treated with sitagliptin. [see WARNINGS AND PRECAUTIONS and ADVERSE REACTIONS]
Table 13: Glycemic Parameters at Final Visit (24-Week Study) for Sitagliptin as Add-on Combination Therapy with Metformin and Insulin*
| Sitagliptin 100 mg + Metformin + Insulin | Placebo + Metformin + Insulin | |
| A1C (%) | N = 223 | N = 229 |
| Baseline (mean) | 8.7 | 8.6 |
| Change from baseline (adjusted mean†,‡) | -0.7 | -0.1 |
| Difference from placebo (adjusted mean†) (95% CI) | -0.5§ (-0.7, -0.4) | |
| Patients (%) achieving A1C <7% | 32 (14%) | 12 (5%) |
| FPG (mg/dL) | N = 225 | N = 229 |
| Baseline (mean) | 173 | 176 |
| Change from baseline (adjusted mean†) | -22 | -4 |
| Change from baseline (adjusted mean†) -22 -4 Difference from placebo (adjusted mean†) (95% CI) | -18§ (-28, -8.4) | |
| 2-hour PPG (mg/dL) | N = 182 | N = 189 |
| Baseline (mean) | 281 | 281 |
| Change from baseline (adjusted mean†) | -39 | 1 |
| Difference from placebo (adjusted mean†) (95% CI) | -40§ (-53, -28) | |
| * Intent-to-treat population using last observation on study prior to rescue therapy. † Least squares means adjusted for insulin use at the screening visit, type of insulin used at the screening visit (pre-mixed vs. non pre-mixed [intermediate- or long-acting]), and baseline value. ‡ Treatment by insulin stratum interaction was not significant (p >0.10). § p<0.001 compared to placebo. |
||
A total of 746 patients with type 2 diabetes (mean baseline HbA1C 8.8%, disease duration 10.8 years) participated in a 30-week, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study to assess the efficacy and safety of continuing sitagliptin during the initiation and uptitration of insulin glargine. Patients who were on a stable dose of metformin HCl (≥1500 mg/day) in combination with a DPP-4 inhibitor and/or sulfonylurea but with inadequate glycemic control (A1C 7.5% to 11%) were enrolled in the study. Those on metformin and sitagliptin (100 mg/day) directly entered the double-blind treatment period; those on another DPP-4 inhibitor and/or on a sulfonylurea entered a 4-8 week run-in period in which they were maintained on metformin and switched to sitagliptin (100 mg); other DPP-4 inhibitors and sulfonylureas were discontinued. At randomization patients were randomized either to continue sitagliptin or to discontinue sitagliptin and switch to a matching placebo. On the day of randomization, insulin glargine was initiated at a dose of 10 units subcutaneously in the evening. Patients were instructed to uptitrate their insulin dose in the evening based on fasting blood glucose measurements to achieve a target of 72-100 mg/dL.
At 30 weeks, the mean reduction in A1C was greater in the sitagliptin group than in the placebo group (Table 14). At the end of the trial, 27.3% of patients in the sitagliptin group and 27.3% in the placebo group had a fasting plasma glucose (FPG) in the target range; there was no significant difference in insulin dose between arms.
Table 14: Change from Baseline in A1C and FPG at Week 30 in the Maintenance of Sitagliptin During Initiation and Titration of Insulin Glargine Study
| Sitagliptin 100 mg +Metformin + Insulin Glargine | Placebo +Metformin + Insulin Glargine | |
| A1C (%) | N = 373† | N = 370† |
| Baseline (mean) | 8.8 | 8.8 |
| Week 30 (mean) | 6.9 | 7.3 |
| Change from baseline (adjusted mean)* | -1.9 | -1.4 |
| Difference from placebo (adjusted mean) (95% CI)* | -0.4 (-0.6, -0.3)‡ | |
| Patients (%) with A1C <7% | 202 (54.2%) | 131 (35.4%) |
| FPG (mg/dL) | N = 373† | N = 370† |
| Baseline (mean) | 199 | 201 |
| Week 30 (mean) | 118 | 123 |
| Change from baseline (adjusted mean)* | -81 | -76 |
| * Analysis of Covariance including all post-baseline data regardless of rescue or treatment discontinuation. Model estimates calculated using multiple imputation to model washout of the treatment effect using placebo data for all subjects having missing Week 30 data. † N is the number of randomized and treated patients. ‡ p<0.001 compared to placebo. |
||
The efficacy of sitagliptin was evaluated in a 52-week, double-blind, glipizide-controlled noninferiority trial in patients with type 2 diabetes. Patients not on treatment or on other antihyperglycemic agents entered a run-in treatment period of up to 12 weeks duration with metformin monotherapy (dose of ≥1500 mg per day) which included washout of medications other than metformin, if applicable. After the run-in period, those with inadequate glycemic control (A1C 6.5% to 10%) were randomized 1:1 to the addition of sitagliptin 100 mg once daily or glipizide for 52 weeks. Patients receiving glipizide were given an initial dosage of 5 mg/day and then electively titrated over the next 18 weeks to a maximum dosage of 20 mg/day as needed to optimize glycemic control. Thereafter, the glipizide dose was to be kept constant, except for down-titration to prevent hypoglycemia. The mean dose of glipizide after the titration period was 10 mg.
After 52 weeks, sitagliptin and glipizide had similar mean reductions from baseline in A1C in the intent-to-treat analysis (Table 15). These results were consistent with the per protocol analysis (Figure 2). A conclusion in favor of the non-inferiority of sitagliptin to glipizide may be limited to patients with baseline A1C comparable to those included in the study (over 70% of patients had baseline A1C less than 8% and over 90% had A1C less than 9%).
Table 15: Glycemic Parameters in a 52-Week Study Comparing Sitagliptin to Glipizide as Add-On Therapy in Patients Inadequately Controlled on Metformin (Intent-to-Treat Population)*
| Sitagliptin 100 mg + Metformin | Glipizide + Metformin | |
| A1C (%) | N = 576 | N = 559 |
| Baseline (mean) | 7.7 | 7.6 |
| Change from baseline (adjusted mean†) | -0.5 | -0.6 |
| FPG (mg/dL) | N = 583 | N = 568 |
| Baseline (mean) | 166 | 164 |
| Change from baseline (adjusted mean†) | -8 | -8 |
| * The intent-to-treat analysis used the patients' last observation in the study prior to discontinuation. † Least squares means adjusted for prior antihyperglycemic therapy status and baseline A1C value. |
||
Figure 2:Mean Change from Baseline for A1C (%) Over 52 Weeks in a Study Comparing Sitagliptin to Glipizide as Add-On Therapy in Patients Inadequately Controlled on Metformin (Per Protocol Population) *
 |
| * The per protocol population (mean baseline A1C of 7.5%) included patients without major protocol violations who had observations at baseline and at Week 52. |
The incidence of hypoglycemia in the sitagliptin group (4.9%) was significantly (p<0.001) lower than that in the glipizide group (32.0%). Patients treated with sitagliptin exhibited a significant mean decrease from baseline in body weight compared to a significant weight gain in patients administered glipizide (-1.5 kg vs. +1.1 kg).
No information provided. Please refer to the WARNINGS AND PRECAUTIONS section.
