CLINICAL PHARMACOLOGY
Poliomyelitis is caused by poliovirus Types 1, 2, or 3.
It is primarily spread by the fecal-oral route of transmission but may also be
spread by the pharyngeal route.
Approximately 90% to 95% of poliovirus infections are
asymptomatic. Nonspecific illness with low-grade fever and sore throat (minor
illness) occurs in 4% to 8% of infections. Aseptic meningitis occurs in 1% to
5% of patients a few days after the minor illness has resolved. Rapid onset of
asymmetric acute flaccid paralysis occurs in 0.1% to 2% of infections, and
residual paralytic disease involving motor neurons (paralytic poliomyelitis)
occurs in approximately 1 per 1,000 infections.5
Prior to the introduction of inactivated poliovirus
vaccines in 1955, large outbreaks of poliomyelitis occurred each year in the
United States (US). The annual incidence of paralytic disease of 11.4
cases/100,000 population declined to 0.5 cases by the time oral poliovirus
vaccine (OPV) was introduced in 1961. Incidence continued to decline thereafter
to a rate of 0.002 to 0.005 cases per 100,000 population. Of the 127 cases of paralytic
poliomyelitis reported in the US between 1980 and 1994, six were imported cases
(caused by wild polioviruses), two were “indeterminate” cases, and 119 were
vaccine associated paralytic poliomyelitis (VAPP) cases associated with the use
of live, attenuated oral poliovirus vaccine (OPV).6 An all IPV
schedule was adopted in 1999 to eliminate VAPP cases.7
Poliovirus Vaccine Inactivated induces the production of
neutralizing antibodies against each type of virus which are related to
protective efficacy. Antibody response in most children was induced after
receiving fewer doses8 of IPV vaccine than the vaccine available in
the United States prior to 1988.
Studies in developed8 and developing9,10
countries with a similar enhanced IPV manufactured by the same process as IPOL
vaccine in primary monkey kidney cells have shown a direct relationship exists
between the antigenic content of the vaccine, the frequency of seroconversion,
and resulting antibody titer. Approval in the US was based upon demonstration
of immunogenicity and safety in US children.11
In the US, 219 infants received three doses of a similar
enhanced IPV at two, four, and eighteen months of age manufactured by the same
process as IPOL vaccine except the cell substrate for IPV was using primary
monkey kidney cells. Seroconversion to all three types of poliovirus was
demonstrated in 99% of these infants after two doses of vaccine given at 2 and
4 months of age. Following the third dose of vaccine at 18 months of age,
neutralizing antibodies were present at a level of ≥ 1:10 in 99.1% of
children to Type 1 and 100% of children to Types 2 and 3 polioviruses.3
IPOL vaccine was administered to more than 700 infants
between 2 to 18 months of age during three clinical studies conducted in the US
using IPV only schedules and sequential IPV-OPV schedules.12,13
Seroprevalence rates for detectable serum neutralizing antibody (DA) at a ≥ 1:4
dilution were 95% to 100% (Type 1); 97% to 100% (Type 2) and 96% to 100% (Type
3) after two doses of IPOL vaccine depending on studies.
Table 1: US Studies with IPOL Vaccine Administered
Using IPV Only or Sequential IPV- OPV Schedules
Age (months) for |
Post Dose 2 |
Post Dose 3 |
Pre Booster |
Post Booster |
2 |
4 |
6 |
12 to 18 |
N* |
Type 1 |
Type 2 |
Type 3 |
N* |
Type 1 |
Type 2 |
Type 3 |
N* |
Type 1 |
Type 2 |
Type 3 |
N* |
Type 1 |
Type 2 |
Type 3 |
Dose 1 |
Dose 2 |
Dose 3 |
Booster |
%DA** |
%DA |
%DA |
%DA |
%DA |
%DA |
%DA |
%DA |
%DA |
%DA |
%DA |
%DA |
STUDY 111¶ |
I(s) |
I(s) |
NA† |
I(s) |
56 |
97 |
100 |
97 |
|
- |
- |
- |
53 |
91 |
97 |
93 |
53 |
97 |
100 |
100 |
O |
O |
NA |
O |
22 |
100 |
100 |
100 |
|
- |
- |
- |
22 |
78 |
91 |
78 |
20 |
100 |
100 |
100 |
I(s) |
O |
NA |
O |
17 |
95 |
100 |
95 |
|
- |
- |
- |
17 |
95 |
100 |
95 |
17 |
100 |
100 |
100 |
I(s) |
I(s) |
N A |
O |
17 |
100 |
100 |
100 |
|
- |
- |
- |
16 |
100 |
100 |
94 |
16 |
100 |
100 |
100 |
STUDY 210 § |
I(c) |
I(c) |
NA |
I(s) |
94 |
98 |
97 |
96 |
|
- |
- |
- |
100 |
92 |
95 |
88 |
97 |
100 |
100 |
100 |
I(s) |
I(s) |
NA |
I(s) |
68 |
99 |
100 |
99 |
|
- |
- |
- |
72 |
100 |
100 |
94 |
75 |
100 |
100 |
100 |
I(c) |
I(c) |
NA |
O |
75 |
95 |
99 |
96 |
|
- |
- |
- |
77 |
86 |
97 |
82 |
78 |
100 |
100 |
97 |
I(s) |
I(s) |
N A |
O |
101 |
99 |
99 |
95 |
|
- |
- |
- |
103 |
99 |
97 |
89 |
107 |
100 |
100 |
100 |
STUDY 3 10 § |
I(c) |
I(c) |
I(c) |
O |
91 |
98 |
99 |
100 |
91 |
100 |
100 |
100 |
41 |
100 |
100 |
100 |
40 |
100 |
100 |
100 |
I(c) |
I(c) |
O |
O |
96 |
100 |
98 |
99 |
94 |
100 |
100 |
99 |
47 |
100 |
100 |
100 |
45 |
100 |
100 |
100 |
I(c) |
I(c) |
I(c) |
+ O O |
91 |
96 |
97 |
100 |
85 |
100 |
100 |
100 |
47 |
100 |
100 |
100 |
46 |
100 |
100 |
100 |
* N = Number of children from whom serum was available
** Detectable antibody (neutralizing titer ≥ 1:4)
† NA - No poliovirus vaccine administered
¶ IPOL vaccine given subcutaneously
§Â   IPOL vaccine given intramuscularly
IÂ Â Â IPOL vaccine given either separately in association with DTP in
two sites (s) or combined (c) with DTP in a dual chambered syringe
O OPV |
In one study,13 the persistence of DA in
infants receiving two doses of IPOL vaccine at 2 and 4 months of age was 91% to
100% (Type 1), 97% to 100% (Type 2), and 93% to 94% (Type 3) at twelve months
of age. In another study,12 86% to 100% (Type 1), 95% to 100% (Type
2), and 82% to 94% (Type 3) of infants still had DA at 18 months of age.
In trials and field studies conducted outside the US,
IPOL vaccine, or a combination vaccine containing IPOL vaccine and DTP, was
administered to more than 3,000 infants between 2 to 18 months of age using IPV
only schedules and immunogenicity data are available from 1,485 infants. After
two doses of vaccine given during the first year of life, seroprevalence rates
for detectable serum neutralizing antibody (neutralizing titer ≥ 1:4) were
88% to 100% (Type 1); 84% to 100% (Type 2) and 94% to 100% (Type 3) of infants,
depending on studies. When three doses were given during the first year of
life, post-dose 3 DA ranged between 93% to 100% (Type 1); 89% to 100% (Type 2)
and 97% to 100% (Type 3) and reached 100% for Types 1, 2, and 3 after the
fourth dose given during the second year of life (12 to 18 months of age).14
In infants immunized with three doses of an unlicensed
combination vaccine containing IPOL vaccine and DTP given during the first year
of life, and a fourth dose given during the second year of life, the
persistence of detectable neutralizing antibodies was 96%, 96%, and 97% against
poliovirus Types 1, 2, and 3, respectively, at six years of age. DA reached
100% for all types after a booster dose of IPOL vaccine combined with DTP
vaccine.11 A survey of Swedish children and young adults given a
Swedish IPV only schedule demonstrated persistence of detectable serum
neutralizing antibody for at least 10 years to all three types of poliovirus.15
IPV is able to induce secretory antibody (IgA) produced
in the pharynx and gut and reduces pharyngeal excretion of poliovirus Type 1
from 75% in children with neutralizing antibodies at levels less than 1:8 to
25% in children with neutralizing antibodies at levels more than 1:64.4,14,16,17,18,19,20,21,22
There is also evidence of induction of herd immunity with IPV,15,23,24,25,26
and that this herd immunity is sufficiently maintained in a population
vaccinated only with IPV.26
VAPP has not been reported in association with
administration of IPOL vaccine.27 It is expected that an IPV only
schedule will eliminate the risk of VAPP in both recipients and contacts
compared to a schedule that included OPV.7
REFERENCES
1. van Wezel AL, et al. Inactivated poliovirus vaccine:
Current production methods and new developments. Rev Infect Dis 6 (Suppl 2):
S335-S340, 1984.
2. Montagnon BJ, et al. Industrial scale production of
inactivated poliovirus vaccine prepared by culture of Vero cells on
microcarrier. Rev Infect Dis 6 (Suppl 2): S341-S344, 1984.
3. McBean AM, et al. Serologic response to oral polio vaccine
and enhanced-potency inactivated polio vaccines. Am J Epidemiol 128: 615-628,
1988.
4. Murdin AD, et al. Inactivated
poliovirus vaccine: past and present experience. Vaccine 8: 735-746, 1996.
5. Sabin AB. Poliomyelitis. In Brande
AI, Davis CE, Fierer J (eds) International Textbook of Medicine, Vol II.
Infectious Diseases and Medical Microbiology. 2nd ed. Philadelphia, WB
Saunders, 1986.
6. Prevots DR, et al.
Vaccine-associated paralytic poliomyelitis in the United States, l980- 1994:
current risk and potential impact of a proposed sequential schedule of IPV
followed by OPV (Abstract #H90). In: Abstracts of the 36th Interscience
Conference on Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy. Washington, DC. American
Society for Microbiology, 179, 1996.
7. ACIP. Updated Recommendations of the
Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices. Poliomyelitis Prevention in the
United States. MMWR 49: No. RR-5, 2000.
8. Salk J, et al. Antigen content of
inactivated poliovirus vaccine for use in a one- or two-dose regimen. Ann Clin
Res 14: 204-212, 1982.
9. Salk J, et al. Killed poliovirus antigen titration in
humans. Develop Biol Standard 41: 119Â132, 1978.
10. Salk J, et al. Theoretical and practical
considerations in the application of killed poliovirus vaccine for the control
of paralytic poliomyelitis. Develop Biol Standard 47: 181-198, 1981.
11. Unpublished data available from Sanofi Pasteur SA.
12. Unpublished data available from Sanofi Pasteur Inc.
13. Faden H, et al. Comparative evaluation of
immunization with live attenuated and enhanced potency inactivated trivalent
poliovirus vaccines in childhood: Systemic and local immune responses. J Infect
Dis 162: 1291-1297, 1990.
14. Vidor E, et al. The place of DTP/eIPV vaccine in
routine pediatric vaccination. Rev Med Virol 4: 261-277, 1994.
15. Bottiger M. Long-term immunity following vaccination
with killed poliovirus vaccine in Sweden, a country with no circulating
poliovirus. Rev Infect Dis 6 (Suppl 2): S548-S551, 1984.
16. Plotkin SA, et al. Inactivated polio vaccine for the
United States: a missed vaccination opportunity. Pediatr Infect Dis J 14:
835-839, 1995.
17. Marine WM, et al. Limitation of fecal and pharyngeal
poliovirus excretion in Salk- vaccinated children. A family study during a Type
1 poliomyelitis epidemic. Amer J Hyg 76: 173-195, 1962.
18. Bottiger M, et al. Vaccination with
attenuated Type 1 poliovirus, the Chat strain. II. Transmission of virus in
relation to age. Acta Paed Scand 55: 416-421, 1966.
19. Dick GWA, et al. Vaccination against poliomyelitis
with live virus vaccines. Effect of previous Salk vaccination on virus
excretion. Brit Med J 2: 266-269, 1961.
20. Wehrle PF, et al. Transmission of poliovirus; III.
Prevalence of polioviruses in pharyngeal secretions of infected household
contacts of patients with clinical disease. Pediatrics 27: 762-764, 1961.
21. Adenyi-Jones SC, et al. Systemic and local immune
responses to enhanced-potency inactivated poliovirus vaccine in premature and
term infants. J Pediatr 120: No 5, 686-689, 1992.
22. Chin TDY. Immunity induced by inactivated poliovirus
vaccine and excretion of virus. Rev Infect Dis 6 (Suppl 2): S369-S370, 1984.
23. Salk D. Herd effect and virus eradication with use of
killed poliovirus vaccine. Develop Biol Standard 47: 247-255, 1981.
24. Bijerk H. Surveillance and control of poliomyelitis
in the Netherlands. Rev Infect Dis 6 (Suppl 2): S451-S456, 1984.
25. Lapinleimu K. Elimination of poliomyelitis in
Finland. Rev Infect Dis 6 (Suppl 2): S457- S460, 1984.
26. Conyn van Spaendonck M, et al. Circulation of
Poliovirus during the poliomyelitis outbreak in the Netherlands in 1992-1993.
Amer J Epidemiology 143: 929-935, 1996.
27. Strebel PM, et al. Epidemiology of poliomyelitis in
the United States one decade after the last reported case of indigenous wild
virus associated disease. Clin Infect Dis 14: 568-579, 1992.