CLINICAL PHARMACOLOGY
Mechanism Of Action
Sodium-glucose co-transporter 2 (SGLT2), expressed in the proximal renal tubules, is
responsible for the majority of the reabsorption of filtered glucose from the tubular lumen.
Canagliflozin is an inhibitor of SGLT2. By inhibiting SGLT2, canagliflozin reduces reabsorption
of filtered glucose and lowers the renal threshold for glucose (RTG), and thereby increases
urinary glucose excretion (UGE).
Pharmacodynamics
Following single and multiple oral doses of canagliflozin in patients with type 2 diabetes, dosedependent
decreases in the renal threshold for glucose (RTG) and increases in urinary glucose
excretion were observed. From a starting RTG value of approximately 240 mg/dL, canagliflozin
at 100 mg and 300 mg once daily suppressed RTG throughout the 24-hour period. Maximal
suppression of mean RTG over the 24-hour period was seen with the 300 mg daily dose to
approximately 70 to 90 mg/dL in patients with type 2 diabetes in Phase 1 trials. The reductions in
RTG led to increases in mean UGE of approximately 100 g/day in subjects with type 2 diabetes
treated with either 100 mg or 300 mg of canagliflozin. In patients with type 2 diabetes given 100
to 300 mg once daily over a 16-day dosing period, reductions in RTG and increases in urinary
glucose excretion were observed over the dosing period. In this trial, plasma glucose declined in
a dose-dependent fashion within the first day of dosing. In single-dose trials in healthy and
type 2 diabetic subjects, treatment with canagliflozin 300 mg before a mixed-meal delayed
intestinal glucose absorption and reduced postprandial glucose.
Cardiac Electrophysiology
In a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, active-comparator, 4-way crossover trial,
60 healthy subjects were administered a single oral dose of canagliflozin 300 mg, canagliflozin
1,200 mg (4 times the maximum recommended dose), moxifloxacin, and placebo. No
meaningful changes in QTc interval were observed with either the recommended dose of 300 mg
or the 1,200 mg dose.
Pharmacokinetics
The pharmacokinetics of canagliflozin is similar in healthy subjects and patients with type 2
diabetes. Following single-dose oral administration of 100 mg and 300 mg of INVOKANA, peak
plasma concentrations (median Tmax) of canagliflozin occurs within 1 to 2 hours post-dose.
Plasma Cmax and AUC of canagliflozin increased in a dose-proportional manner from 50 mg to
300 mg. The apparent terminal half-life (t1/2) was 10.6 hours and 13.1 hours for the 100 mg and
300 mg doses, respectively. Steady-state was reached after 4 to 5 days of once-daily dosing with
canagliflozin 100 mg to 300 mg. Canagliflozin does not exhibit time-dependent
pharmacokinetics and accumulated in plasma up to 36% following multiple doses of 100 mg and
300 mg.
Absorption
The mean absolute oral bioavailability of canagliflozin is approximately 65%. Co-administration
of a high-fat meal with canagliflozin had no effect on the pharmacokinetics of canagliflozin;
therefore, INVOKANA may be taken with or without food. However, based on the potential to
reduce postprandial plasma glucose excursions due to delayed intestinal glucose absorption, it is
recommended that INVOKANA be taken before the first meal of the day [see DOSAGE AND ADMINISTRATION].
Distribution
The mean steady-state volume of distribution of canagliflozin following a single intravenous
infusion in healthy subjects was 83.5 L, suggesting extensive tissue distribution. Canagliflozin is
extensively bound to proteins in plasma (99%), mainly to albumin. Protein binding is
independent of canagliflozin plasma concentrations. Plasma protein binding is not meaningfully
altered in patients with renal or hepatic impairment.
Metabolism
O-glucuronidation is the major metabolic elimination pathway for canagliflozin, which is mainly
glucuronidated by UGT1A9 and UGT2B4 to two inactive O-glucuronide metabolites.
CYP3A4-mediated (oxidative) metabolism of canagliflozin is minimal (approximately 7%) in
humans.
Excretion
Following administration of a single oral [14C] canagliflozin dose to healthy subjects, 41.5%,
7.0%, and 3.2% of the administered radioactive dose was recovered in feces as canagliflozin, a
hydroxylated metabolite, and an O-glucuronide metabolite, respectively. Enterohepatic
circulation of canagliflozin was negligible.
Approximately 33% of the administered radioactive dose was excreted in urine, mainly as
O-glucuronide metabolites (30.5%). Less than 1% of the dose was excreted as unchanged
canagliflozin in urine. Renal clearance of canagliflozin 100 mg and 300 mg doses ranged from
1.30 to 1.55 mL/min.
Mean systemic clearance of canagliflozin was approximately 192 mL/min in healthy subjects
following intravenous administration.
Specific Populations
Renal Impairment
A single-dose, open-label trial evaluated the pharmacokinetics of canagliflozin 200 mg in
subjects with varying degrees of renal impairment (classified using the MDRD-eGFR formula)
compared to healthy subjects.
Renal impairment did not affect the Cmax of canagliflozin. Compared to healthy subjects (N=3;
eGFR greater than or equal to 90 mL/min/1.73 m2), plasma AUC of canagliflozin was increased
by approximately 15%, 29%, and 53% in subjects with mild (N=10), moderate (N=9), and severe
(N=10) renal impairment, respectively, (eGFR 60 to less than 90, 30 to less than 60, and 15 to
less than 30 mL/min/1.73 m2, respectively), but was similar for ESRD (N=8) subjects and
healthy subjects.
Increases in canagliflozin AUC of this magnitude are not considered clinically relevant. The
pharmacodynamic response to canagliflozin declines with increasing severity of renal
impairment [see CONTRAINDICATIONS and WARNINGS AND PRECAUTIONS].
Canagliflozin was negligibly removed by hemodialysis.
Hepatic Impairment
Relative to subjects with normal hepatic function, the geometric mean ratios for Cmax and AUC∞
of canagliflozin were 107% and 110%, respectively, in subjects with Child-Pugh class A (mild
hepatic impairment) and 96% and 111%, respectively, in subjects with Child-Pugh class B
(moderate hepatic impairment) following administration of a single 300 mg dose of
canagliflozin.
These differences are not considered to be clinically meaningful. There is no clinical experience
in patients with Child-Pugh class C (severe) hepatic impairment [see Use In Specific Populations].
Pharmacokinetic Effects of Age, Body Mass Index (BMI)/Weight, Gender and Race
Based on the population PK analysis with data collected from 1526 subjects, age, body mass
index (BMI)/weight, gender, and race do not have a clinically meaningful effect on the
pharmacokinetics of canagliflozin [see Use In Specific Populations].
Drug Interaction Studies
In Vitro Assessment Of Drug Interactions
Canagliflozin did not induce CYP450 enzyme expression (3A4, 2C9, 2C19, 2B6, and 1A2) in
cultured human hepatocytes. Canagliflozin did not inhibit the CYP450 isoenzymes (1A2, 2A6,
2C19, 2D6, or 2E1) and weakly inhibited CYP2B6, CYP2C8, CYP2C9, and CYP3A4 based on
in vitro studies with human hepatic microsomes. Canagliflozin is a weak inhibitor of P-gp.
Canagliflozin is also a substrate of drug transporters P-glycoprotein (P-gp) and MRP2.
In Vivo Assessment Of Drug Interactions
Table 7: Effect of Co-Administered Drugs on Systemic Exposures of Canagliflozin
Co-Administered Drug |
Dose of
Co-Administered
Drug* |
Dose of
Canagliflozin* |
Geometric Mean Ratio
(Ratio With/Without Co-Administered
Drug)
No Effect = 1.0 |
AUC†
(90% CI) |
Cmax
(90% CI) |
See DRUG INTERACTIONS for the clinical relevance of the following: |
Rifampin |
600 mg QD
for 8 days |
300 mg |
0.49
(0.44; 0.54) |
0.72
(0.61; 0.84) |
No dose adjustments of INVOKANA required for the following: |
Cyclosporine |
400 mg |
300 mg QD for 8 days |
1.23 (1.19; 1.27) |
1.01 (0.91; 1.11) |
Ethinyl estradiol and
levonorgestrel |
0.03 mg ethinyl
estradiol and
0.15 mg
levonorgestrel |
200 mg QD
for 6 days |
0.91
(0.88; 0.94) |
0.92
(0.84; 0.99) |
Hydrochlorothiazide |
25 mg QD
for 35 days |
300 mg QD for
7 days |
1.12
(1.08; 1.17) |
1.15
(1.06; 1.25) |
Metformin |
2,000 mg |
300 mg QD for
8 days |
1.10
(1.05; 1.15) |
1.05
(0.96; 1.16) |
Probenecid |
500 mg BID
for 3 days |
300 mg QD for
17 days |
1.21
(1.16; 1.25) |
1.13
(1.00; 1.28) |
* Single dose unless otherwise noted
† AUCinf for drugs given as a single dose and AUC24h for drugs given as multiple doses
QD = once daily; BID = twice daily |
Table 8: Effect of Canagliflozin on Systemic Exposure of Co-Administered Drugs
Co-Administered
Drug |
Dose of Co-
Administered
Drug* |
Dose of
Canagliflozin* |
Geometric Mean Ratio
(Ratio With/ Without
Co-Administered Drug)
No Effect = 1.0 |
|
AUC†
(90% CI) |
Cmax
(90% CI) |
See DRUG INTERACTIONS for the clinical relevance of the following: |
Digoxin |
0.5 mg QD
first day
followed by
0.25 mg QD
for 6 days |
300 mg QD
for 7 days |
Digoxin |
1.20
(1.12; 1.28) |
1.36
(1.21; 1.53) |
No dose adjustments of co-administered drug required for the following: |
Acetaminophen |
1,000 mg |
300 mg BID for
25 days |
Acetaminophen |
1.06‡
(0.98; 1.14) |
1.00
(0.92; 1.09) |
Ethinyl estradiol and
levonorgestrel |
0.03 mg
ethinyl
estradiol and
0.15 mg
levonorgestrel |
200 mg QD
for 6 days |
ethinyl estradiol |
1.07
(0.99; 1.15) |
1.22
(1.10; 1.35) |
Levonorgestrel |
1.06
(1.00; 1.13) |
1.22
(1.11; 1.35) |
Glyburide |
1.25 mg |
200 mg QD
for 6 days |
Glyburide |
1.02
(0.98; 1.07) |
0.93
(0.85; 1.01) |
3-cis-hydroxyglyburide |
1.01
(0.96; 1.07) |
0.99
(0.91; 1.08) |
4-trans-hydroxyglyburide |
1.03
(0.97; 1.09) |
0.96
(0.88; 1.04) |
Hydrochlorothiazide |
25 mg QD
for 35 days |
300 mg QD
for 7 days |
Hydrochlorothiazide |
0.99
(0.95; 1.04) |
0.94
(0.87; 1.01) |
Metformin |
2,000 mg |
300 mg QD
for 8 days |
Metformin |
1.20
(1.08; 1.34) |
1.06
(0.93; 1.20) |
Simvastatin |
40 mg |
300 mg QD
for 7 days |
Simvastatin |
1.12
(0.94; 1.33) |
1.09
(0.91; 1.31) |
simvastatin acid |
1.18 (1.03; 1.35) |
1.26 (1.10; 1.45) |
Warfarin |
30 mg |
300 mg QD
for 12 days |
(R)-warfarin |
1.01
(0.96; 1.06) |
1.03
(0.94; 1.13) |
(S)-warfarin |
1.06
(1.00; 1.12) |
1.01
(0.90; 1.13) |
INR |
1.00
(0.98; 1.03) |
1.05
(0.99; 1.12) |
* Single dose unless otherwise noted
† AUCinf for drugs given as a single dose and AUC24h for drugs given as multiple doses
‡ AUC0-12h
QD = once daily; BID = twice daily; INR = International Normalized Ratio |
Clinical Studies
INVOKANA (canagliflozin) has been studied as monotherapy, in combination with metformin,
sulfonylurea, metformin and sulfonylurea, metformin and sitagliptin, metformin and a
thiazolidinedione (i.e., pioglitazone), and in combination with insulin (with or without other
anti-hyperglycemic agents). The efficacy of INVOKANA was compared to a dipeptidyl
peptidase-4 (DPP-4) inhibitor (sitagliptin), both as add-on combination therapy with metformin
and sulfonylurea, and a sulfonylurea (glimepiride), both as add-on combination therapy with
metformin. INVOKANA was also evaluated in adults 55 to 80 years of age and patients with
moderate renal impairment.
In patients with type 2 diabetes, treatment with INVOKANA produced clinically and statistically
significant improvements in HbA1C compared to placebo. Reductions in HbA1C were observed
across subgroups including age, gender, race, and baseline body mass index (BMI).
Glycemic Control Trials In Adults With Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus
Monotherapy
A total of 584 patients with type 2 diabetes inadequately controlled on diet and exercise
participated in a 26-week double-blind, placebo-controlled trial to evaluate the efficacy and
safety of INVOKANA. The mean age was 55 years, 44% of patients were men, and the mean
baseline eGFR was 87 mL/min/1.73 m2. Patients taking other antihyperglycemic agents (N=281)
discontinued the agent and underwent an 8-week washout followed by a 2-week, single-blind,
placebo run-in period. Patients not taking oral antihyperglycemic agents (N=303) entered the
2-week, single-blind, placebo run-in period directly. After the placebo run-in period, patients
were randomized to INVOKANA 100 mg, INVOKANA 300 mg, or placebo, administered once
daily for 26 weeks.
At the end of treatment, INVOKANA 100 mg and 300 mg once daily resulted in a statistically
significant improvement in HbA1C (p<0.001 for both doses) compared to placebo. INVOKANA
100 mg and 300 mg once daily also resulted in a greater proportion of patients achieving an
HbA1C less than 7%, in significant reduction in fasting plasma glucose (FPG), in improved
postprandial glucose (PPG), and in percent body weight reduction compared to placebo (see
Table 9). Statistically significant (p<0.001 for both doses) mean changes from baseline in
systolic blood pressure relative to placebo were -3.7 mmHg and -5.4 mmHg with INVOKANA
100 mg and 300 mg, respectively.
Table 9: Results from 26-Week Placebo-Controlled Clinical Study with INVOKANA as Monotherapy*
Efficacy Parameter |
Placebo
(N=192) |
INVOKANA
100 mg
(N=195) |
INVOKANA
300 mg
(N=197) |
HbA1C (%) |
Baseline (mean) |
7.97 |
8.06 |
8.01 |
Change from baseline (adjusted mean) |
0.14 |
-0.77 |
-1.03 |
Difference from placebo (adjusted mean) (95%
CI)† |
|
-0.91‡
(-1.09; -0.73) |
-1.16‡
(-1.34; -0.99) |
Percent of Patients Achieving HbA1C < 7% |
21 |
45‡ |
62‡ |
Fasting Plasma Glucose (mg/dL) |
Baseline (mean) |
166 |
172 |
173 |
Change from baseline (adjusted mean) |
8 |
-27 |
-35 |
Difference from placebo (adjusted mean) (95%
CI)† |
|
-36‡
(-42; -29) |
-43‡
(-50; -37) |
2-hour Postprandial Glucose (mg/dL) |
Baseline (mean) |
229 |
250 |
254 |
Change from baseline (adjusted mean) |
5 |
-43 |
-59 |
Difference from placebo (adjusted mean) (95%
CI)† |
|
-48‡
(-59.1; -37.0) |
-64‡
(-75.0; -52.9) |
Body Weight |
Baseline (mean) in kg |
87.5 |
85.9 |
86.9 |
% change from baseline (adjusted mean) |
-0.6 |
-2.8 |
-3.9 |
Difference from placebo (adjusted mean) (95%
CI)† |
|
-2.2‡
(-2.9; -1.6) |
-3.3‡
(-4.0; -2.6) |
* Intent-to-treat population using last observation in study prior to glycemic rescue therapy
† Least squares mean adjusted for baseline value and stratification factors
‡ p<0.001 |
Add-On Combination Therapy With Metformin
A total of 1,284 patients with type 2 diabetes inadequately controlled on metformin monotherapy
(greater than or equal to 2,000 mg/day, or at least 1,500 mg/day if higher dose not tolerated)
participated in a 26-week, double-blind, placebo- and active-controlled trial to evaluate the
efficacy and safety of INVOKANA in combination with metformin. The mean age was 55 years,
47% of patients were men, and the mean baseline eGFR was 89 mL/min/1.73 m2. Patients
already on the required metformin dose (N=1009) were randomized after completing a 2-week,
single-blind, placebo run-in period. Patients taking less than the required metformin dose or
patients on metformin in combination with another antihyperglycemic agent (N=275) were
switched to metformin monotherapy (at doses described above) for at least 8 weeks before
entering the 2-week, single-blind, placebo run-in. After the placebo run-in period, patients were
randomized to INVOKANA 100 mg, INVOKANA 300 mg, sitagliptin 100 mg, or placebo,
administered once daily as add-on therapy to metformin.
At the end of treatment, INVOKANA 100 mg and 300 mg once daily resulted in a statistically
significant improvement in HbA1C (p<0.001 for both doses) compared to placebo when added to
metformin. INVOKANA 100 mg and 300 mg once daily also resulted in a greater proportion of
patients achieving an HbA1C less than 7%, in significant reduction in fasting plasma glucose
(FPG), in improved postprandial glucose (PPG), and in percent body weight reduction compared
to placebo when added to metformin (see Table 10). Statistically significant (p<0.001 for both
doses) mean changes from baseline in systolic blood pressure relative to placebo were
-5.4 mmHg and -6.6 mmHg with INVOKANA 100 mg and 300 mg, respectively.
Table 10: Results from 26-Week Placebo-Controlled Clinical Study of INVOKANA in Combination with
Metformin
Efficacy Parameter |
Placebo +
Metformin
(N=183) |
INVOKANA
100 mg +
Metformin
(N=368) |
INVOKANA
300 mg +
Metformin
(N=367) |
HbA1C (%) |
Baseline (mean) |
7.96 |
7.94 |
7.95 |
Change from baseline (adjusted mean) |
-0.17 |
-0.79 |
-0.94 |
Difference from placebo (adjusted mean) (95%
CI)† |
|
-0.62‡
(-0.76; -0.48) |
-0.77‡
(-0.91; -0.64) |
Percent of patients achieving HbA1C < 7% |
30 |
46‡ |
58‡ |
Fasting Plasma Glucose (mg/dL) |
Baseline (mean) |
164 |
169 |
173 |
Change from baseline (adjusted mean) |
2 |
-27 |
-38 |
Difference from placebo (adjusted mean) (95%
CI)† |
|
-30‡
(-36; -24) |
-40‡
(-46; -34) |
2-hour Postprandial Glucose (mg/dL) |
Baseline (mean) |
249 |
258 |
262 |
Change from baseline (adjusted mean) |
-10 |
-48 |
-57 |
Difference from placebo (adjusted mean) (95%
CI)† |
|
38‡
(-49; -27) |
-47‡
(-58; -36) |
Body Weight |
|
|
|
Baseline (mean) in kg |
86.7 |
88.7 |
85.4 |
% change from baseline (adjusted mean) |
-1.2 |
-3.7 |
-4.2 |
Difference from placebo (adjusted mean) (95%
CI)† |
|
-2.5‡
(-3.1; -1.9) |
-2.9‡
(-3.5; -2.3) |
* Intent-to-treat population using last observation in study prior to glycemic rescue therapy
† Least squares mean adjusted for baseline value and stratification factors
‡ p<0.001 |
Initial Combination Therapy With Metformin
A total of 1,186 patients with type 2 diabetes inadequately controlled with diet and exercise
participated in a 26-week double-blind, active-controlled, parallel-group, 5-arm, multicenter trial
to evaluate the efficacy and safety of initial therapy with INVOKANA in combination with
metformin XR. The median age was 56 years, 48% of patients were men, and the mean baseline
eGFR was 87.6 mL/min/1.73 m2. The median duration of diabetes was 1.6 years, and 72% of
patients were treatment naïve. After completing a 2-week single-blind placebo run-in period,
patients were randomly assigned for a double-blind treatment period of 26 weeks to 1 of
5 treatment groups (Table 11). The metformin XR dose was initiated at 500 mg/day for the first
week of treatment and then increased to 1000 mg/day. Metformin XR or matching placebo was
up-titrated every 2-3 weeks during the next 8 weeks of treatment to a maximum daily dose of
1500 to 2000 mg/day, as tolerated; about 90% of patients reached 2000 mg/day.
At the end of treatment, INVOKANA 100 mg and INVOKANA 300 mg in combination with
metformin XR resulted in a statistically significant greater improvement in HbA1C compared to
their respective INVOKANA doses (100 mg and 300 mg) alone or metformin XR alone.
Table 11: Results from 26-Week Active-Controlled Clinical Study of INVOKANA Alone or INVOKANA as
Initial Combination Therapy with Metformin*
Efficacy Parameter |
Metformin
XR
(N=237) |
INVOKANA
100 mg
(N=237) |
INVOKANA
300 mg
(N=238) |
INVOKANA
100 mg +
Metformin XR
(N=237) |
INVOKANA
300 mg +
Metformin XR
(N=237) |
HbA1C (%) |
Baseline (mean) |
8.81 |
8.78 |
8.77 |
8.83 |
8.90 |
Change from baseline
(adjusted mean)¶ |
-1.30 |
-1.37 |
-1.42 |
-1.77 |
-1.78 |
Difference from
canagliflozin 100 mg
(adjusted mean)
(95% CI)† |
|
|
|
-0.40‡
(-0.59, -0.21) |
|
Difference from
canagliflozin 300 mg
(adjusted mean)
(95% CI)† |
|
|
|
|
-0.36‡
(-0.56, -0.17) |
Difference from
metformin XR
(adjusted mean)
(95% CI)† |
|
-0.06‡‡
(-0.26, 0.13) |
-0.11‡‡
(-0.31, 0.08) |
-0.46‡
(-0.66, -0.27) |
-0.48‡
(-0.67, -0.28) |
Percent of patients
achieving HbA1C
< 7% |
38 |
34 |
39 |
47§§ |
51§§ |
* Intent-to-treat population
† Least squares mean adjusted for covariates including baseline value and stratification factor
‡ Adjusted p=0.001 for superiority
‡‡ Adjusted p=0.001 for non-inferiority
§§ Adjusted p<0.05
¶ There were 121 patients without week 26 efficacy data. Analyses addressing missing data gave consistent results with the results provided in
this table. |
INVOKANA Compared To Glimepiride, Both As Add-On Combination With Metformin
A total of 1,450 patients with type 2 diabetes inadequately controlled on metformin monotherapy
(greater than or equal to 2,000 mg/day, or at least 1,500 mg/day if higher dose not tolerated)
participated in a 52-week, double-blind, active-controlled trial to evaluate the efficacy and safety
of INVOKANA in combination with metformin.
The mean age was 56 years, 52% of patients were men, and the mean baseline eGFR was
90 mL/min/1.73 m2. Patients tolerating maximally required metformin dose (N=928) were
randomized after completing a 2-week, single-blind, placebo run-in period. Other patients
(N=522) were switched to metformin monotherapy (at doses described above) for at least
10 weeks, then completed a 2-week single-blind run-in period. After the 2-week run-in period,
patients were randomized to INVOKANA 100 mg, INVOKANA 300 mg, or glimepiride
(titration allowed throughout the 52-week trial to 6 or 8 mg), administered once daily as add-on
therapy to metformin.
As shown in Table 12 and Figure 1, at the end of treatment, INVOKANA 100 mg provided
similar reductions in HbA1C from baseline compared to glimepiride when added to metformin
therapy. INVOKANA 300 mg provided a greater reduction from baseline in HbA1C compared to
glimepiride, and the relative treatment difference was -0.12% (95% CI: −0.22; −0.02). As shown
in Table 12, treatment with INVOKANA 100 mg and 300 mg daily provided greater
improvements in percent body weight change, relative to glimepiride.
Table 12: Results from 52-Week Clinical Study Comparing INVOKANA to Glimepiride in Combination
with Metformin*
Efficacy Parameter |
INVOKANA
100 mg +
Metformin
(N=483) |
INVOKANA
300 mg +
Metformin
(N=485) |
Glimepiride
(titrated) +
Metformin
(N=482) |
HbA1C (%) |
Baseline (mean) |
7.78 |
7.79 |
7.83 |
Change from baseline (adjusted mean) |
-0.82 |
-0.93 |
-0.81 |
Difference from glimepiride (adjusted mean)
(95% CI)† |
-0.01‡
(-0.11; 0.09) |
-0.12‡
(-0.22; -0.02) |
|
Percent of patients achieving HbA1C < 7% |
54 |
60 |
56 |
Fasting Plasma Glucose (mg/dL |
Baseline (mean) |
165 |
164 |
166 |
Change from baseline (adjusted mean) |
-24 |
-28 |
-18 |
Difference from glimepiride (adjusted mean)
(95% CI)† |
-6
(-10; -2) |
-9
(-13; -5) |
|
Body Weight |
Baseline (mean) in kg |
86.8 |
86.6 |
86.6 |
% change from baseline (adjusted mean) |
-4.2 |
-4.7 |
1.0 |
Difference from glimepiride (adjusted mean)
(95% CI)† |
-5.2§
(-5.7; -4.7) |
-5.7§
(-6.2; -5.1) |
|
* Intent-to-treat population using last observation in study prior to glycemic rescue therapy
† Least squares mean adjusted for baseline value and stratification factors
‡ INVOKANA + metformin is considered non-inferior to glimepiride + metformin because the upper limit of this
confidence interval is less than the pre-specified non-inferiority margin of < 0.3%.
§ p<0.001 |
Figure 1: Mean HbA1C Change at Each Time Point (Completers) and at Week 52 Using Last
Observation Carried Forward (mITT Population)
Add-On Combination Therapy With Sulfonylurea
A total of 127 patients with type 2 diabetes inadequately controlled on sulfonylurea monotherapy
participated in an 18-week, double-blind, placebo-controlled sub-study to evaluate the efficacy
and safety of INVOKANA in combination with sulfonylurea. The mean age was 65 years,
57% of patients were men, and the mean baseline eGFR was 69 mL/min/1.73 m2. Patients treated
with sulfonylurea monotherapy on a stable protocol-specified dose (greater than or equal to 50%
maximal dose) for at least 10 weeks completed a 2-week, single-blind, placebo run-in period.
After the run-in period, patients with inadequate glycemic control were randomized to
INVOKANA 100 mg, INVOKANA 300 mg, or placebo, administered once daily as add-on to
sulfonylurea.
As shown in Table 13, at the end of treatment, INVOKANA 100 mg and 300 mg daily provided
statistically significant (p<0.001 for both doses) improvements in HbA1C relative to placebo
when added to sulfonylurea. INVOKANA 300 mg once daily compared to placebo resulted in a
greater proportion of patients achieving an HbA1C less than 7%, (33% vs 5%), greater reductions
in fasting plasma glucose (-36 mg/dL vs +12 mg/dL), and greater percent body weight reduction
(-2.0% vs -0.2%).
Table 13: Results from 18-Week Placebo-Controlled Clinical Study of INVOKANA in Combination with
Sulfonylurea*
Efficacy Parameter |
Placebo +
Sulfonylurea
(N=45) |
INVOKANA
100 mg +
Sulfonylurea
(N=42) |
INVOKANA
300 mg +
Sulfonylurea
(N=40) |
HbA1C (%) |
|
|
|
Baseline (mean) |
8.49 |
8.29 |
8.28 |
Change from baseline (adjusted mean) |
0.04 |
-0.70 |
-0.79 |
Difference from placebo (adjusted mean) (95%
CI)† |
|
-0.74‡
(-1.15; -0.33) |
-0.83‡
(-1.24; -0.41) |
* Intent-to-treat population using last observation in study prior to glycemic rescue therapy
† Least squares mean adjusted for baseline value
‡ p<0.001 |
Add-On Combination Therapy With Metformin And Sulfonylurea
A total of 469 patients with type 2 diabetes inadequately controlled on the combination of
metformin (greater than or equal to 2,000 mg/day or at least 1,500 mg/day if higher dose not
tolerated) and sulfonylurea (maximal or near-maximal effective dose) participated in a 26-week,
double-blind, placebo-controlled trial to evaluate the efficacy and safety of INVOKANA in
combination with metformin and sulfonylurea. The mean age was 57 years, 51% of patients were
men, and the mean baseline eGFR was 89 mL/min/1.73 m2. Patients already on the protocolspecified
doses of metformin and sulfonylurea (N=372) entered a 2-week, single-blind, placebo
run-in period. Other patients (N=97) were required to be on a stable protocol-specified dose of
metformin and sulfonylurea for at least 8 weeks before entering the 2-week run-in period.
Following the run-in period, patients were randomized to INVOKANA 100 mg, INVOKANA
300 mg, or placebo, administered once daily as add-on to metformin and sulfonylurea.
At the end of treatment, INVOKANA 100 mg and 300 mg once daily resulted in a statistically
significant improvement in HbA1C (p<0.001 for both doses) compared to placebo when added to
metformin and sulfonylurea. INVOKANA 100 mg and 300 mg once daily also resulted in a
greater proportion of patients achieving an HbA1C less than 7%, in a significant reduction in
fasting plasma glucose (FPG), and in percent body weight reduction compared to placebo when
added to metformin and sulfonylurea (see Table 14).
Table 14: Results from 26-Week Placebo-Controlled Clinical Study of INVOKANA in Combination with
Metformin and Sulfonylurea*
Efficacy Parameter |
Placebo +
Metformin and
Sulfonylurea
(N=156) |
INVOKANA
100 mg +
Metformin
and Sulfonylurea
(N=157) |
INVOKANA
300 mg +
Metformin
and Sulfonylurea
(N=156) |
HbA1C (%) |
Baseline (mean) |
8.12 |
8.13 |
8.13 |
Change from baseline (adjusted mean) |
-0.13 |
-0.85 |
-1.06 |
Difference from placebo (adjusted mean) (95%
CI)† |
|
-0.71‡
(-0.90; -0.52) |
-0.92‡
(-1.11; -0.73) |
Percent of patients achieving A1C < 7% |
18 |
43‡ |
57‡ |
Fasting Plasma Glucose (mg/dL) |
Baseline (mean) |
170 |
173 |
168 |
Change from baseline (adjusted mean) |
4 |
-18 |
-31 |
Difference from placebo (adjusted mean) (95%
CI)† |
|
-22‡
(-31; -13) |
-35‡
(-44; -25) |
Body Weight |
Baseline (mean) in kg |
90.8 |
93.5 |
93.5 |
% change from baseline (adjusted mean) |
-0.7 |
-2.1 |
-2.6 |
Difference from placebo (adjusted mean) (95%
CI)† |
|
-1.4‡
(-2.1; -0.7) |
-2.0‡
(-2.7; -1.3) |
* Intent-to-treat population using last observation in study prior to glycemic rescue therapy
† Least squares mean adjusted for baseline value and stratification factors
‡ p<0.001 |
Add-On Combination Therapy With Metformin And Sitagliptin
A total of 217 patients with type 2 diabetes inadequately controlled on the combination of
metformin (greater than or equal to 1,500 mg/day) and sitagliptin 100 mg/day (or equivalent
fixed-dose combination) participated in a 26-week, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial to
evaluate the efficacy and safety of INVOKANA in combination with metformin and sitagliptin.
The mean age was 57 years, 58% of patients were men, 73% of patients were Caucasian, 15%
were Asian, and 12% were Black or African-American. The mean baseline eGFR was
90 mL/min/1.73 m2 and the mean baseline BMI was 32 kg/m2. The mean duration of diabetes
was 10 years. Eligible patients entered a 2-week, single-blind, placebo run-in period and were
subsequently randomized to INVOKANA 100 mg or placebo, administered once daily as add-on
to metformin and sitagliptin. Patients with a baseline eGFR of 70 mL/min/1.73 m2 or greater
who were tolerating INVOKANA 100 mg and who required additional glycemic control (fasting
finger stick 100 mg/dL or greater at least twice within 2 weeks) were up-titrated to INVOKANA
300 mg. While up-titration occurred as early as Week 4, most (90%) patients randomized to
INVOKANA were up-titrated to INVOKANA 300 mg by 6 to 8 weeks.
At the end of 26 weeks, INVOKANA resulted in a statistically significant improvement in
HbA1C (p<0.001) compared to placebo when added to metformin and sitagliptin.
Table 15: Results from 26-Week Placebo-Controlled Clinical Study of INVOKANA in Combination with
Metformin and Sitagliptin
Efficacy Parameter |
Placebo +
Metformin and
Sitagliptin
(N=108*) |
INVOKANA +
Metformin and
Sitagliptin
(N=109*) |
HbA1C (%) |
Baseline (mean) |
8.40 |
8.50 |
Change from baseline (adjusted mean) |
-0.03 |
-0.83 |
Difference from placebo (adjusted mean) (95% CI)†§ |
|
-0.81#
(-1.11; -0.51) |
Percent of patients achieving HbA1C < 7%‡ |
9 |
28 |
Fasting Plasma Glucose (mg/dL)¶ |
Baseline (mean) |
180 |
185 |
Change from baseline (adjusted mean) |
-3 |
-28 |
Difference from placebo (adjusted mean) (95% CI) |
|
-25# (-39; -11) |
* To preserve the integrity of randomization, all randomized patients were included in the analysis. The patient who
was randomized once to each arm was analyzed on INVOKANA.
† Early treatment discontinuation before week 26, occurred in 11.0% and 24.1% of INVOKANA and placebo
patients, respectively.
‡ Patients without week 26 efficacy data were considered as non-responders when estimating the proportion
achieving HbA1C < 7%.
§ Estimated using a multiple imputation method modeling a "wash-out" of the treatment effect for patients having
missing data who discontinued treatment. Missing data was imputed only at week 26 and analyzed using
ANCOVA.
¶ Estimated using a multiple imputation method modeling a "wash-out" of the treatment effect for patients having
missing data who discontinued treatment. A mixed model for repeated measures was used to analyze the imputed
data.
# p<0.001 |
INVOKANA Compared To Sitagliptin, Both As Add-On Combination Therapy With
Metformin And Sulfonylurea
A total of 755 patients with type 2 diabetes inadequately controlled on the combination of
metformin (greater than or equal to 2,000 mg/day or at least 1,500 mg/day if higher dose not
tolerated) and sulfonylurea (near-maximal or maximal effective dose) participated in a 52-week,
double-blind, active-controlled trial to compare the efficacy and safety of INVOKANA 300 mg
versus sitagliptin 100 mg in combination with metformin and sulfonylurea. The mean age was
57 years, 56% of patients were men, and the mean baseline eGFR was 88 mL/min/1.73 m2.
Patients already on protocol-specified doses of metformin and sulfonylurea (N=716) entered a
2-week single-blind, placebo run-in period. Other patients (N=39) were required to be on a stable
protocol-specified dose of metformin and sulfonylurea for at least 8 weeks before entering the
2-week run-in period. Following the run-in period, patients were randomized to INVOKANA
300 mg or sitagliptin 100 mg as add-on to metformin and sulfonylurea.
As shown in Table 16 and Figure 2, at the end of treatment, INVOKANA 300 mg provided
greater HbA1C reduction compared to sitagliptin 100 mg when added to metformin and
sulfonylurea (p<0.05). INVOKANA 300 mg resulted in a mean percent change in body weight
from baseline of -2.5% compared to +0.3% with sitagliptin 100 mg. A mean change in systolic
blood pressure from baseline of -5.06 mmHg was observed with INVOKANA 300 mg compared
to +0.85 mmHg with sitagliptin 100 mg.
Table 16: Results from 52-Week Clinical Study Comparing INVOKANA to Sitagliptin in Combination with
Metformin and Sulfonylurea*
Efficacy Parameter |
INVOKANA 300 mg +
Metformin and
Sulfonylurea
(N=377) |
Sitagliptin 100 mg +
Metformin and
Sulfonylurea
(N=378) |
HbA1C (%) |
Baseline (mean) |
8.12 |
8.13 |
Change from baseline (adjusted mean) |
-1.03 |
-0.66 |
Difference from sitagliptin (adjusted mean) (95% CI)† |
-0.37‡
(-0.50; -0.25) |
|
Percent of patients achieving HbA1C < 7% |
48 |
35 |
Fasting Plasma Glucose (mg/dL) |
Baseline (mean) |
170 |
164 |
Change from baseline (adjusted mean) |
-30 |
-6 |
Difference from sitagliptin (adjusted mean) (95% CI)† |
-24
(-30; -18) |
|
Body Weight |
Baseline (mean) in kg |
87.6 |
89.6 |
% change from baseline (adjusted mean) |
-2.5 |
0.3 |
Difference from sitagliptin (adjusted mean) (95% CI)† |
-2.8§
(-3.3; -2.2) |
|
* Intent-to-treat population using last observation in study prior to glycemic rescue therapy
† Least squares mean adjusted for baseline value and stratification factors
‡ INVOKANA + metformin + sulfonylurea is considered non-inferior to sitagliptin + metformin + sulfonylurea
because the upper limit of this confidence interval is less than the pre-specified non-inferiority margin of < 0.3%.
§ p<0.001 |
Figure 2: Mean HbA1C Change at Each Time Point (Completers) and at Week 52 Using Last Observation
Carried Forward (mITT Population)
Add-On Combination Therapy With Metformin And Pioglitazone
A total of 342 patients with type 2 diabetes inadequately controlled on the combination of
metformin (greater than or equal to 2,000 mg/day or at least 1,500 mg/day if higher dose not
tolerated) and pioglitazone (30 or 45 mg/day) participated in a 26-week, double-blind, placebocontrolled
trial to evaluate the efficacy and safety of INVOKANA in combination with
metformin and pioglitazone. The mean age was 57 years, 63% of patients were men, and the
mean baseline eGFR was 86 mL/min/1.73 m2. Patients already on protocol-specified doses of
metformin and pioglitazone (N=163) entered a 2-week, single-blind, placebo run-in period.
Other patients (N=181) were required to be on stable protocol-specified doses of metformin and
pioglitazone for at least 8 weeks before entering the 2-week run-in period. Following the run-in
period, patients were randomized to INVOKANA 100 mg, INVOKANA 300 mg, or placebo,
administered once daily as add-on to metformin and pioglitazone.
At the end of treatment, INVOKANA 100 mg and 300 mg once daily resulted in a statistically
significant improvement in HbA1C (p<0.001 for both doses) compared to placebo when added to
metformin and pioglitazone. INVOKANA 100 mg and 300 mg once daily also resulted in a
greater proportion of patients achieving an HbA1C less than 7%, in significant reduction in
fasting plasma glucose (FPG) and in percent body weight reduction compared to placebo when
added to metformin and pioglitazone (see Table 17). Statistically significant (p<0.05 for both
doses) mean changes from baseline in systolic blood pressure relative to placebo were
-4.1 mmHg and -3.5 mmHg with INVOKANA 100 mg and 300 mg, respectively.
Table 17: Results from 26-Week Placebo-Controlled Clinical Study of INVOKANA in Combination with
Metformin and Pioglitazone*
Efficacy Parameter |
Placebo +
Metformin
and Pioglitazone
(N=115) |
INVOKANA
100 mg +
Metformin and
Pioglitazone
(N=113) |
INVOKANA
300 mg +
Metformin and
Pioglitazone
(N=114) |
HbA1C (%) |
Baseline (mean) |
8.00 |
7.99 |
7.84 |
Change from baseline (adjusted mean) |
-0.26 |
-0.89 |
-1.03 |
Difference from placebo (adjusted mean)
(95% CI)† |
|
-0.62‡
(-0.81; -0.44) |
-0.76‡
(-0.95; -0.58) |
Percent of patients achieving HbA1C < 7% |
33 |
47‡ |
64‡ |
Fasting Plasma Glucose (mg/dL) |
Baseline (mean) |
164 |
169 |
164 |
Change from baseline (adjusted mean) |
3 |
-27 |
-33 |
Difference from placebo (adjusted mean)
(95% CI)† |
|
-29‡
(-37; -22) |
-36‡
(-43; -28) |
Body Weight |
Baseline (mean) in kg |
94.0 |
94.2 |
94.4 |
% change from baseline (adjusted mean) |
-0.1 |
-2.8 |
-3.8 |
Difference from placebo (adjusted mean)
(95% CI)† |
|
-2.7‡
(-3.6; -1.8) |
-3.7‡
(-4.6; -2.8) |
* Intent-to-treat population using last observation in study prior to glycemic rescue therapy
† Least squares mean adjusted for baseline value and stratification factors
‡ p<0.001 |
Add-On Combination Therapy With Insulin (With Or Without Other Antihyperglycemic
Agents)
A total of 1,718 patients with type 2 diabetes inadequately controlled on insulin greater than or
equal to 30 units/day or insulin in combination with other antihyperglycemic agents participated
in an 18-week, double-blind, placebo-controlled substudy of a cardiovascular trial to evaluate the
efficacy and safety of INVOKANA in combination with insulin. The mean age was 63 years,
66% of patients were men, and the mean baseline eGFR was 75 mL/min/1.73 m2. Patients on
basal, bolus, or basal/bolus insulin for at least 10 weeks entered a 2-week, single-blind, placebo
run-in period. Approximately 70% of patients were on a background basal/bolus insulin regimen.
After the run-in period, patients were randomized to INVOKANA 100 mg, INVOKANA
300 mg, or placebo, administered once daily as add-on to insulin. The mean daily insulin dose at
baseline was 83 units, which was similar across treatment groups.
At the end of treatment, INVOKANA 100 mg and 300 mg once daily resulted in a statistically
significant improvement in HbA1C (p<0.001 for both doses) compared to placebo when added to
insulin. INVOKANA 100 mg and 300 mg once daily also resulted in a greater proportion of
patients achieving an HbA1C less than 7%, in significant reductions in fasting plasma glucose
(FPG), and in percent body weight reductions compared to placebo (see Table 18). Statistically
significant (p<0.001 for both doses) mean changes from baseline in systolic blood pressure
relative to placebo were -2.6 mmHg and -4.4 mmHg with INVOKANA 100 mg and 300 mg,
respectively.
Table 18: Results from 18-Week Placebo-Controlled Clinical Study of INVOKANA in Combination with
Insulin ≥ 30 Units/Day (With or Without Other Oral Antihyperglycemic Agents)*
Efficacy Parameter |
Placebo +
Insulin
(N=565) |
INVOKANA
100 mg + Insulin
(N=566) |
INVOKANA 300 mg +
Insulin
(N=587) |
HbA1C (%) |
Baseline (mean) |
8.20 |
8.33 |
8.27 |
Change from baseline (adjusted mean) |
0.01 |
-0.63 |
-0.72 |
Difference from placebo (adjusted mean)
(95% CI)† |
|
-0.65‡
(-0.73; -0.56) |
-0.73‡
(-0.82; -0.65) |
Percent of patients achieving HbA1C < 7% |
8 |
20‡ |
25‡ |
Fasting Plasma Glucose (mg/dL) |
Baseline |
169 |
170 |
168 |
Change from baseline (adjusted mean) |
4 |
-19 |
-25 |
Difference from placebo (adjusted mean)
(97.5% CI)† |
|
-23‡
(-29; -16) |
-29‡
(-35; -23) |
Body Weight |
Baseline (mean) in kg |
97.7 |
96.9 |
96.7 |
% change from baseline (adjusted mean) |
0.1 |
-1.8 |
-2.3 |
Difference from placebo (adjusted mean)
(97.5% CI)† |
|
-1.9‡
(-2.2; -1.6) |
-2.4‡
(-2.7; -2.1) |
* Intent-to-treat population using last observation in study prior to glycemic rescue therapy
† Least squares mean adjusted for baseline value and stratification factors
‡ p<0.001 |
Study In Patients Ages 55 To 80
A total of 714 type 2 diabetes patients ages 55 to 80 years and inadequately controlled on current
diabetes therapy (either diet and exercise alone or in combination with oral or parenteral agents)
participated in a 26-week, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial to evaluate the efficacy and
safety of INVOKANA in combination with current diabetes treatment. The mean age was
64 years, 55% of patients were men, and the mean baseline eGFR was 77 mL/min/1.73 m2.
Patients were randomized in a 1:1:1 ratio to the addition of INVOKANA 100 mg, INVOKANA
300 mg, or placebo, administered once daily. At the end of treatment, INVOKANA provided
statistically significant improvements from baseline relative to placebo in HbA1C (p<0.001 for
both doses) of -0.57% (95% CI: -0.71%; -0.44%) for INVOKANA 100 mg and -0.70% (95% CI:
-0.84%; -0.57%) for INVOKANA 300 mg. [see Use In Specific Populations].
Moderate Renal Impairment
A total of 269 patients with type 2 diabetes and a baseline eGFR of 30 mL/min/1.73 m2 to less
than 50 mL/min/1.73 m2 inadequately controlled on current diabetes therapy participated in a
26-week, double-blind, placebo-controlled clinical trial to evaluate the efficacy and safety of
INVOKANA in combination with current diabetes treatment (diet or antihyperglycemic agent
therapy, with 95% of patients on insulin and/or sulfonylurea). The mean age was 68 years, 61%
of patients were men, and the mean baseline eGFR was 39 mL/min/1.73 m2. Patients were
randomized in a 1:1:1 ratio to the addition of INVOKANA 100 mg, INVOKANA 300 mg, or
placebo, administered once daily.
At the end of treatment, INVOKANA 100 mg and INVOKANA 300 mg daily provided greater
reductions in HbA1C relative to placebo (-0.30% [95% CI: -0.53%; -0.07%] and -0.40%,
[95% CI: -0.64%; -0.17%], respectively) [see WARNINGS AND PRECAUTIONS, ADVERSE REACTIONS, and Use In Specific Populations].
Cardiovascular Outcomes In Patients With Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus And
Atherosclerotic Cardiovascular Disease
The CANVAS and CANVAS-R trials were multicenter, multi-national, randomized, doubleblind
parallel group, with similar inclusion and exclusion criteria. Patients eligible for enrollment
in both CANVAS and CANVAS-R trials were: 30 years of age or older and had established,
stable, cardiovascular, cerebrovascular, peripheral artery disease (66% of the enrolled
population) or were 50 years of age or older and had two or more other specified risk factors for
cardiovascular disease (34% of the enrolled population).
The integrated analysis of the CANVAS and CANVAS-R trials compared the risk of Major
Adverse Cardiovascular Event (MACE) between canagliflozin and placebo when these were
added to and used concomitantly with standard of care treatments for diabetes and
atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease. The primary endpoint, MACE, was the time to first
occurrence of a three-part composite outcome which included cardiovascular death, non-fatal
myocardial infarction and non-fatal stroke.
In CANVAS, patients were randomly assigned 1:1:1 to canagliflozin 100 mg, canagliflozin
300 mg, or matching placebo. In CANVAS-R, patients were randomly assigned 1:1 to
canagliflozin 100 mg or matching placebo, and titration to 300 mg was permitted at the
investigator’s discretion (based on tolerability and glycemic needs) after Week 13. Concomitant
antidiabetic and atherosclerotic therapies could be adjusted, at the discretion of investigators, to
ensure participants were treated according to the standard care for these diseases.
A total of 10,134 patients were treated (4,327 in CANVAS and 5,807 in CANVAS-R; total of
4,344 randomly assigned to placebo and 5,790 to canagliflozin) and exposed for a mean of
149 weeks (exposed for a mean of 223 weeks [4.3 years] in CANVAS and 94 weeks [1.8 years]
in CANVAS-R). Approximately 78% of the trial population was Caucasian, 13% was Asian, and
3% was Black. The mean age was 63 years and approximately 64% were male.
The mean HbA1C at baseline was 8.2% and mean duration of diabetes was 13.5 years with 70%
of patients having had diabetes for 10 years or more. Approximately 31%, 21% and
17% reported a past history of neuropathy, retinopathy and nephropathy, respectively, and the
mean eGFR 76 mL/min/1.73 m2. At baseline, patients were treated with one (19%) or more
(80%) antidiabetic medications including metformin (77%), insulin (50%), and sulfonylurea
(43%).
At baseline, the mean systolic blood pressure was 137 mmHg, the mean diastolic blood pressure
was 78 mmHg, the mean LDL was 89 mg/dL, the mean HDL was 46 mg/dL, and the mean
urinary albumin to creatinine ratio (UACR) was 115 mg/g. At baseline, approximately 80% of
patients were treated with renin angiotensin system inhibitors, 53% with beta-blockers, 13% with
loop diuretics, 36% with non-loop diuretics, 75% with statins, and 74% with antiplatelet agents
(mostly aspirin). During the trial, investigators could modify anti-diabetic and cardiovascular
therapies to achieve local standard of care treatment targets with respect to blood glucose, lipid,
and blood pressure. More patients receiving canagliflozin compared to placebo initiated antithrombotics
(5.2% vs 4.2%) and statins (5.8% vs 4.8%) during the trial.
For the primary analysis, a stratified Cox proportional hazards model was used to test for noninferiority
against a pre-specified risk margin of 1.3 for the hazard ratio of MACE.
In the integrated analysis of CANVAS and CANVAS-R trials, canagliflozin reduced the risk of
first occurrence of MACE. The estimated hazard ratio (95% CI) for time to first MACE was 0.86
(0.75, 0.97). Refer to Table 19. Vital status was obtained for 99.6% of patients across the trials.
The Kaplan-Meier curve depicting time to first occurrence of MACE is shown in Figure 3.
Table 19: Treatment Effect for the Primary Composite Endpoint, MACE, and its Components in the
Integrated Analysis of CANVAS and CANVAS-R studies
|
Placebo
N=4347 |
Canagliflozin
N=5795 |
Hazard ratio
(95% C.I.)¶ |
Composite of cardiovascular death, non-fatal myocardial
infarction, non-fatal stroke
(time to first occurrence)†, ‡, §, |
426 (10.4) |
585 (9.2) |
0.86 (0.75, 0.97) |
Non-fatal myocardial infarction‡, § |
159 (3.9) |
215 (3.4) |
0.85 (0.69, 1.05) |
Non-fatal Stroke‡, § |
116 (2.8) |
158 (2.5) |
0.90 (0.71, 1.15) |
Cardiovascular Death‡, § |
185 (4.6) |
268 (4.1) |
0.87 (0.72, 1.06) |
* Intent-To-Treat Analysis Set
† P-value for superiority (2-sided) = 0.0158
‡ Number and percentage of first events
§ Due to pooling of unequal randomization ratios, Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel weights were applied to calculate
percentages
¶ Stratified Cox-proportional hazards model with treatment as a factor and stratified by study and by prior CV
disease |
Figure 3: Time to First Occurrence of MACE