CLINICAL PHARMACOLOGY
Mechanism Of Action
Ertapenem sodium is a
carbapenem antibiotic.
Pharmacokinetics
Average plasma concentrations
(mcg/mL) of ertapenem following a single 30-minute infusion of a 1 g
intravenous (IV) dose and administration of a single 1 g intramuscular (IM)
dose in healthy young adults are presented in Table 8.
Table 8 : Plasma
Concentrations of Ertapenem in Adults After Single Dose Administration
Dose/ Route |
Average Plasma Concentrations (mcg/mL) |
0.5 hr |
1 hr |
2 hr |
4 hr |
6 hr |
8 hr |
12 hr |
18 hr |
24 hr |
1 g IV* |
155 |
115 |
83 |
48 |
31 |
20 |
9 |
3 |
1 |
1 g IM |
33 |
53 |
67 |
57 |
40 |
27 |
13 |
4 |
2 |
*Infused at a constant rate over 30 minutes |
The area under the plasma
concentration-time curve (AUC) of ertapenem in adults increased less-than
dose-proportional based on total ertapenem concentrations over the 0.5 to 2 g
dose range, whereas the AUC increased greater-than dose-proportional based on
unbound ertapenem concentrations. Ertapenem exhibits non-linear
pharmacokinetics due to concentration-dependent plasma protein binding at the proposed
therapeutic dose. There is no accumulation
of ertapenem following multiple IV or IM 1 g daily doses in healthy adults.
Average plasma concentrations
(mcg/mL) of ertapenem in pediatric patients are presented in Table 9.
Table 9 : Plasma
Concentrations of Ertapenem in Pediatric Patients After Single IV* Dose
Administration
Age Group |
Dose |
Average Plasma Concentrations (mcg/mL) |
0.5 hr |
1 hr |
2 hr |
4 hr |
6 hr |
8 hr |
12 hr |
24 hr |
3 to 23 months |
15 mg/kg† |
103.8 |
57.3 |
43.6 |
23.7 |
13.5 |
8.2 |
2.5 |
- |
20 mg/kg† |
126.8 |
87.6 |
58.7 |
28.4 |
- |
12.0 |
3.4 |
0.4 |
40 mg/kg‡ |
199.1 |
144.1 |
95.7 |
58.0 |
- |
20.2 |
7.7 |
0.6 |
2 to 12 years |
15 mg/kg† |
113.2 |
63.9 |
42.1 |
21.9 |
12.8 |
7.6 |
3.0 |
- |
20 mg/kg† |
147.6 |
97.6 |
63.2 |
34.5 |
- |
12.3 |
4.9 |
0.5 |
40 mg/kg† |
241.7 |
152.7 |
96.3 |
55.6 |
- |
18.8 |
7.2 |
0.6 |
13 to 17 years |
20 mg/kg† |
170.4 |
98.3 |
67.8 |
40.4 |
- |
16.0 |
7.0 |
1.1 |
1 g§ |
155.9 |
110.9 |
74.8 |
- |
24.0 |
- |
6.2 |
- |
40 mg/kg† |
255.0 |
188.7 |
127.9 |
76.2 |
- |
31.0 |
15.3 |
2.1 |
* Infused at a constant rate
over 30 minutes
† up to a maximum dose of 1 g/day
‡ up to a maximum dose of 2 g/day
§ Based on three patients receiving 1 g ertapenem who volunteered for
pharmacokinetic assessment in one of the two safety and efficacy trials |
Absorption
Ertapenem, reconstituted with
1% lidocaine HCl injection, USP (in saline without epinephrine), is almost
completely absorbed following intramuscular (IM) administration at the
recommended dose of 1 g. The mean bioavailability is approximately 90%.
Following 1 g daily IM administration, mean peak plasma concentrations (Cmax)
are achieved in approximately 2.3 hours (Tmax).
Distribution
Ertapenem is highly bound to
human plasma proteins, primarily albumin. In healthy young adults, the protein
binding of ertapenem decreases as plasma concentrations increase, from
approximately 95% bound at an approximate plasma concentration of < 100
micrograms (mcg)/mL to approximately 85% bound at an approximate plasma
concentration of 300 mcg/mL.
The apparent volume of distribution at steady state (Vss)
of ertapenem in adults is approximately 0.12
liter/kg, approximately 0.2 liter/kg in pediatric patients 3 months to 12 years
of age and approximately 0.16 liter/kg in pediatric patients 13 to 17 years of
age.
The concentrations of ertapenem
achieved in suction-induced skin blister fluid at each sampling point on the
third day of 1 g once daily IV doses are presented in Table 10. The ratio of
AUC0-24 in skin blister fluid/AUC0-24 in plasma is 0.61.
Table 10 : Concentrations
(mcg/mL) of Ertapenem in Adult Skin Blister Fluid at each Sampling Point on the
Third Day of 1-g Once Daily IV Doses
0.5 hr |
1 hr |
2 hr |
4 hr |
8hr |
12 hr |
24 hr |
7 |
12 |
17 |
24 |
24 |
21 |
8 |
The concentration of ertapenem
in breast milk from 5 lactating women with pelvic infections (5 to 14 days
postpartum) was measured at random time points daily for 5 consecutive days
following the last 1 g dose of intravenous therapy (3-10 days of therapy). The
concentration of ertapenem in breast milk within 24 hours of the last dose of
therapy in all 5 women ranged from < 0.13 (lower limit of quantitation) to 0.38
mcg/mL; peak concentrations were not assessed. By day 5 after discontinuation
of therapy, the level of ertapenem was undetectable in the breast milk of 4
women and below the lower limit of quantitation ( < 0.13 mcg/mL) in 1 woman.
Metabolism
In healthy young adults, after
infusion of 1 g IV radiolabeled ertapenem, the plasma radioactivity consists
predominantly (94%) of ertapenem. The major metabolite of ertapenem is the
inactive ring-opened derivative formed by hydrolysis of the beta-lactam ring.
Elimination
Ertapenem is eliminated
primarily by the kidneys. The mean plasma half-life in healthy young adults is
approximately 4 hours and the plasma clearance is approximately 1.8 L/hour. The
mean plasma half-life in pediatric patients 13 to 17 years of age is
approximately 4 hours and approximately 2.5 hours in pediatric patients 3
months to 12 years of age.
Following the administration of
1 g IV radiolabeled ertapenem to healthy young adults, approximately 80% is
recovered in urine and 10% in feces. Of the 80% recovered in urine,
approximately 38% is excreted as unchanged drug and approximately 37% as the
ring-opened metabolite.
In healthy young adults given a
1 g IV dose, the mean percentage of the administered dose excreted in urine was
17.4% during 0-2 hours postdose, 5.4% during 4-6 hours postdose, and 2.4%
during 12-24 hours postdose.
Special Populations
Renal Impairment
Total and unbound fractions of
ertapenem pharmacokinetics were investigated in 26 adult subjects (31 to 80
years of age) with varying degrees of renal impairment. Following a single 1 g
IV dose of ertapenem, the unbound AUC increased 1.5-fold and 2.3-fold in
subjects with mild renal impairment (CLCR 60-90 mL/min/1.73 m²) and
moderate renal impairment (CLCR 31-59 mL/min/1.73 m²), respectively,
compared with healthy young subjects (25 to 45 years of age). No dosage
adjustment is necessary in patients with CLCR ≥ 31 mL/min/1.73 m².
The unbound AUC increased 4.4-fold and 7.6-fold in subjects with advanced renal
impairment (CLCR 5-30 mL/min/1.73 m²) and end-stage renal disease
(CLCR < 10 mL/min/1.73 m²), respectively, compared with healthy
young subjects. The effects of renal impairment on AUC of total drug were of
smaller magnitude. The recommended dose of ertapenem in adult patients with CLCR
≤ 30 mL/min/1.73 m² is 0.5 grams every 24 hours. Following a
single 1 g IV dose given immediately prior to a 4 hour hemodialysis session in
5 adult patients with end-stage renal disease, approximately 30% of the dose
was recovered in the dialysate. Dose adjustments are recommended for patients
with severe renal impairment and end-stage renal disease [see DOSAGE AND
ADMINISTRATION]. There are no data in pediatric patients with renal
impairment.
Hepatic Impairment
The pharmacokinetics of ertapenem
in patients with hepatic impairment have not been established. However,
ertapenem does not appear to undergo hepatic metabolism based on in vitro studies
and approximately 10% of an administered dose is recovered in the feces [see DOSAGE AND ADMINISTRATION].
Gender
The effect of gender on the
pharmacokinetics of ertapenem was evaluated in healthy male (n=8) and healthy
female (n=8) subjects. The differences observed could be attributed to body
size when body weight was taken into consideration. No dose adjustment is
recommended based on gender.
Geriatric Patients
The impact of age on the
pharmacokinetics of ertapenem was evaluated in healthy male (n=7) and healthy
female (n=7) subjects ≥ 65 years of age. The total and unbound AUC
increased 37% and 67%, respectively, in elderly adults relative to young
adults. These changes were attributed to age-related changes in creatinine
clearance. No dosage adjustment is necessary for elderly patients with normal
(for their age) renal function.
Pediatric Patients
Plasma concentrations of
ertapenem are comparable in pediatric patients 13 to 17 years of age and adults
following a 1 g once daily IV dose.
Following the 20 mg/kg dose (up
to a maximum dose of 1 g), the pharmacokinetic parameter values in patients 13
to 17 years of age (N=6) were generally comparable to those in healthy young
adults.
Plasma concentrations at the
midpoint of the dosing interval following a single 15 mg/kg IV dose of
ertapenem in patients 3 months to 12 years of age are comparable to plasma
concentrations at the midpoint of the dosing interval following a 1 g once
daily IV dose in adults. The plasma
clearance (mL/min/kg) of ertapenem in patients 3 months to 12 years of age is
approximately 2-fold higher as compared to that in adults. At the 15 mg/kg
dose, the AUC value (doubled to model a twice daily dosing regimen, i.e., 30
mg/kg/day exposure) in patients 3 months to 12 years of age was comparable to
the AUC value in young healthy adults receiving a 1 g IV dose of ertapenem.
Drug Interactions
W hen ertapenem is co-administered with probenecid (500
mg p.o. every 6 hours), probenecid competes for active tubular secretion and
reduces the renal clearance of ertapenem. Based on total ertapenem
concentrations, probenecid increased the AUC of ertapenem by 25%, and reduced
the plasma and renal clearance of ertapenem by 20% and 35%, respectively. The
half-life of ertapenem was increased from 4.0 to 4.8 hours.
In vitro studies in human liver microsomes indicate that
ertapenem does not inhibit metabolism mediated by any of the following
cytochrome p450 (CYP) isoforms: 1A2, 2C9, 2C19, 2D6, 2E1 and 3A4.
In vitro studies indicate that ertapenem does not inhibit
P-glycoprotein-mediated transport of digoxin or vinblastine and that ertapenem
is not a substrate for P-glycoprotein-mediated transport.
Microbiology
Mechanism of Action
Ertapenem has in vitro activity against Gram-positive and
Gram-negative aerobic and anaerobic bacteria. The bactericidal activity of
ertapenem results from the inhibition of cell wall synthesis and is mediated
through ertapenem binding to penicillin binding proteins (PBPs). In Escherichia
coli, it has strong affinity toward PBPs 1a, 1b, 2, 3, 4 and 5 with preference
for PBPs 2 and 3.
Mechanism of Resistance
Ertapenem is stable against hydrolysis by a variety of
beta-lactamases, including penicillinases, and cephalosporinases and extended
spectrum beta-lactamases. Ertapenem is hydrolyzed by metallo-betalactamases.
Ertapenem has been shown to be active against most
isolates of the following microorganisms both in vitro and in clinical
infections as described in the INDICATIONS AND USAGE section:
Gram-positive Bacteria
Staphylococcus aureus (methicillin susceptible
isolates only)
Streptococcus agalactiae
Streptococcus pneumoniae (penicillin susceptible
isolates only)
Streptococcus pyogenes
Gram-negative Bacteria
Escherichia coli
Haemophilus influenzae (beta-lactamase negative
isolates only)
Klebsiella pneumoniae
Moraxella catarrhalis
Proteus Mirabilis Anaerobic Bacteria
Bacteroides fragilis
Bacteroides distasonis
Bacteroides ovatus
Bacteroides thetaiotaomicron
Bacteroides uniformis
Clostridium clostridioforme
Eubacterium lentum
Peptostreptococcus species
Porphyromonas asaccharolytica
Prevotella bivia
The following in vitro data are available, but their
clinical significance is unknown. At least 90% of the following
bacteria exhibit an in vitro minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) less than
or equal to the susceptible breakpoint for ertapenem. However, the efficacy of
ertapenem in treating clinical infections due to these bacteria has not been established
in adequate and well-controlled clinical trials:
Gram-positive Bacteria
Staphylococcus epidermidis (methicillin
susceptible isolates only)
Streptococcus pneumoniae (penicillin-intermediate
isolates)
Gram-negative Bacteria
Citrobacter freundii
Citrobacter koseri
Enterobacter aerogenes
Enterobacter cloacae
Haemophilus influenzae (beta-lactamase positive
isolates only)
Haemophilus parainfluenzae
Klebsiella oxytoca (excluding ESBL producing
isolates)
Morganella morganii
Proteus vulgaris
Providencia rettgeri
Providencia stuartii
Serratia marcescens
Anaerobic Bacteria
Bacteroides vulgatus
Clostridium perfringens
Fusobacterium spp.
Susceptibility Test Methods
W hen available, the clinical microbiology laboratory
should provide the results of in vitro susceptibility tests for antimicrobial
drug products used in resident hospitals to the physician as periodic reports
which describe the susceptibility profile of nosocomial and community-acquired
pathogens. These reports should aid the physician in selecting the most
effective antimicrobial.
Dilution Techniques
Quantitative methods are used to determine antimicrobial
minimum inhibitory concentrations (MICs). These MICs provide estimates of the
susceptibility of bacteria to antimicrobial compounds. The MICs should be
determined using a standardized procedure. Standardized procedures are based on
a broth dilution method1 or equivalent with standardized inoculum concentrations
and standardized concentrations of ertapenem powder. The MIC values should be
interpreted according to criteria provided in Table 11 and4.
Diffusion Techniques
Quantitative methods that require measurement of zone
diameters also provide reproducible estimates of the susceptibility of bacteria
to antimicrobial compounds. One such standardized procedure2
requires the use of standardized inoculum concentrations. This procedure uses
paper disks impregnated with 10-μg ertapenem to test the susceptibility of
microorganisms to ertapenem. The disk diffusion interpretive criteria should be
interpreted according to criteria provided in Table 11 and4.
Anaerobic Techniques
For anaerobic bacteria, the susceptibility to ertapenem
as MICs can be determined by standardized test methods3. The MIC
values obtained should be interpreted according to criteria provided in Table
11 and4.
Table 11 : Susceptibility Interpretive Criteria for
Ertapenem
Pathogen |
Minimum Inhibitory Concentrations* MIC (μ/mL) |
Disk Diffusion Zone Diameter (mm) |
S |
I |
R |
S |
I |
R |
Enterobacteriaceae |
≤ 0.5 |
1 |
≥ 2 |
≥ 22 |
19-21 |
≤ 18 |
Staphylococcus aureus† |
≤ 2.0 |
4.0 |
≥ 8.0 |
≥ 19 |
16-18 |
≤ 15 |
Haemophilus spp.* |
≤ 0.5 |
- |
- |
≥ 19 |
- |
- |
Streptococcus pneumoniae‡ |
≤ 1.0 |
2 |
≥ 4 |
- |
- |
- |
Streptococcus spp. Beta Hemolytic Group*,‡,§ |
≤ 1.0 |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
Streptococcus spp. Viridans Group* |
≤ 1.0 |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
Anaerobes |
≤ 4.0 |
8.0 |
≥ 16.0 |
- |
- |
- |
* For some organism/antimicrobial combinations, the
absence or rare occurrence of resistant strains precludes defining any results
categories other than “susceptible”. For strains yielding results suggestive of
a “nonsusceptible” category, organism identification and antimicrobial
susceptibility test results should be confirmed.
† For oxacillin-susceptible S. aureus results for
carbapenems, including ertapenem, if tested, should be reported according to
the results generated using routine interpretive criteria. For
oxacillin-resistant S. aureus and coagulase negative staphylococci, other beta
lactam agents, including carbapenems, may appear active in vitro but are not
effective clinically. Results for beta lactam agents other than cephalosporins
with anti-MRSA activity should be reported as resistant or should not be
reported.
‡ S. pneumoniae penicillin MICs ≤ 2 mcg/mL indicate susceptibility
to ertapenem.
§ A beta hemolytic Streptococcus spp. (Groups A, B, C, G) isolate
susceptible to penicillin (MIC ≤ 0.12 μg/mL) can be considered
susceptible to ertapenem and need not be tested against ertapenem. |
A report of “Susceptible”
indicates that the pathogen is likely to be inhibited if the antimicrobial
compound at the infection site reaches the concentrations usually achievable. A
report of “Intermediate” indicates that the result should be considered
equivocal, and, if the microorganism is not fully susceptible to alternative,
clinically feasible drugs, the test should be repeated. This category implies
possible clinical applicability in body sites where the drug is physiologically
concentrated or in situations where high dosage of drug can be used. This
category also provides a buffer zone which prevents small uncontrolled
technical factors from causing major discrepancies in interpretation. A report
of “Resistant” indicates that the pathogen is not likely to be inhibited if the
antimicrobial compound at the infection site reaches the concentrations usually
achievable; other therapy should be selected.
Quality Control
Standardized susceptibility
test procedures require the use of laboratory control microorganisms to ensure
the accuracy and precision of supplies and reagents used in the assay, and the
techniques of the individuals performing the test. Quality control
microorganisms are specific strains of organisms with intrinsic biological
properties. QC strains are very stable strains which will give a standard and
repeatable susceptibility pattern. The specific strains used for
microbiological quality control are not clinically significant. Standard
ertapenem powder should provide the following range of values noted in Table 12
and4,5.
Table 12 : Acceptable Quality Control Ranges for
Ertapenem
Microorganism |
Minimum Inhibitory Concentrations MIC Range (μg/mL) |
Disk Diffusion Zone Diameter (mm) |
Escherichia coli ATCC 25922 |
0.004-0.016 |
29-36 |
Haemophilus influenzae ATCC 49766 |
0.015-0.06 |
27-33 |
Staphylococcus aureus ATCC 29213 |
0.06-0.25 |
- |
Staphylococcus aureus ATCC 25923 |
- |
24-31 |
Streptococcus pneumoniae ATCC 49619 |
0.03-0.25 |
28-35 |
Bacteroides fragilis ATCC 25285 |
0.06-0.5* 0.06-0.25† |
- |
Bacteroides thetaiotaomicron ATCC 29741 |
0.5-2.0* 0.25-1.0† |
- |
Eubacterium lentum ATCC 43055 |
0.5-4.0* 0.5-2.0† |
- |
* Quality control ranges for
broth microdilution testing
† Quality control ranges for agar dilution testing |
Animal Toxicology And/Or Pharmacology
In repeat-dose studies in rats,
treatment-related neutropenia occurred at every dose-level tested, including
the lowest dose of 2 mg/kg (approximately 2% of the human dose on a body
surface area basis).
Studies in rabbits and Rhesus
monkeys were inconclusive with regard to the effect on neutrophil counts.
Clinical Studies
Adults
Complicated Intra-Abdominal Infections
Ertapenem was evaluated in adults for the treatment of
complicated intra-abdominal infections in a randomized, double-blind,
non-inferiority clinical trial. This trial compared ertapenem (1 g
intravenously once a day) with piperacillin/tazobactam (3.375 g intravenously
every 6 hours) for 5 to 14 days and enrolled 665 patients with localized
complicated appendicitis, and any other complicated intra-abdominal infection
including colonic, small intestinal, and biliary infections and generalized
peritonitis. The combined clinical and microbiologic success rates in the
microbiologically evaluable population at 4 to 6 weeks posttherapy
(test-of-cure) were 83.6% (163/195) for ertapenem and 80.4% (152/189) for
piperacillin/tazobactam.
Complicated Skin and Skin Structure Infections
Ertapenem was evaluated in adults for the treatment of
complicated skin and skin structure infections in a randomized, double-blind,
non-inferiority clinical trial. This trial compared ertapenem (1 g
intravenously once a day) with piperacillin/tazobactam (3.375 g intravenously
every 6 hours) for 7 to 14 days and enrolled 540 patients including patients
with deep soft tissue abscess, posttraumatic wound infection and cellulitis
with purulent drainage. The clinical success rates at 10 to 21 days posttherapy
(testof-cure) were 83.9% (141/168) for ertapenem and 85.3% (145/170) for
piperacillin/tazobactam.
Diabetic Foot Infections
Ertapenem was evaluated in adults for the treatment of
diabetic foot infections without concomitant osteomyelitis in a multicenter,
randomized, double-blind, non-inferiority clinical trial. This trial compared
ertapenem (1 g intravenously once a day) with piperacillin/tazobactam (3.375 g
intravenously every 6 hours). Test-of-cure was defined as clinical response
between treatment groups in the clinically evaluable population at the 10-day
posttherapy follow-up visit. The trial included 295 patients randomized to ertapenem
and 291 patients to piperacillin/tazobactam. Both regimens allowed the option
to switch to oral amoxicillin/clavulanate for a total of 5 to 28 days of
treatment (parenteral and oral). All patients were eligible to receive
appropriate adjunctive treatment methods, such as debridement, as is typically
required in the treatment of diabetic foot infections, and most patients
received these treatments. Patients with suspected osteomyelitis could be
enrolled if all the infected bone was removed within 2 days of initiation of
study therapy, and preferably within the prestudy period. Investigators had the
option to add open-label vancomycin if enterococci or methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus
aureus (MRSA) were among the pathogens isolated or if patients had a history of
MRSA infection and additional therapy was indicated in the opinion of the
investigator. Two hundred and four (204) patients randomized to ertapenem and
202 patients randomized to piperacillin/tazobactam were clinically evaluable.
The clinical success rates at 10 days posttherapy were 75.0% (153/204) for
ertapenem and 70.8% (143/202) for piperacillin/tazobactam.
Community Acquired Pneumonia
Ertapenem was evaluated in adults for the treatment of
community acquired pneumonia in two randomized, double-blind, non-inferiority
clinical trials. Both trials compared ertapenem (1 g parenterally once a day)
with ceftriaxone (1 g parenterally once a day) and enrolled a total of 866
patients. Both regimens allowed the option to switch to oral amoxicillin/clavulanate
for a total of 10 to 14 days of treatment (parenteral and oral). In the first
trial the primary efficacy parameter was the clinical success rate in the
clinically evaluable population and success rates were 92.3% (168/182) for
ertapenem and 91.0% (183/201) for ceftriaxone at 7 to 14 days posttherapy
(test-of-cure). In the second trial the primary efficacy parameter was the
clinical success rate in the microbiologically evaluable population and success
rates were 91% (91/100) for ertapenem and 91.8% (45/49) for ceftriaxone at 7 to
14 days posttherapy (test-of-cure).
Complicated Urinary Tract Infections Including
Pyelonephritis
Ertapenem was evaluated in adults for the treatment of
complicated urinary tract infections including pyelonephritis in two
randomized, double-blind, non-inferiority clinical trials. Both trials compared
ertapenem (1 g parenterally once a day) with ceftriaxone (1 g parenterally once
a day) and enrolled a total of 850 patients. Both regimens allowed the option
to switch to oral ciprofloxacin (500 mg twice daily) for a total of 10 to 14
days of treatment (parenteral and oral). The microbiological success rates
(combined trials) at 5 to 9 days posttherapy (test-of-cure) were 89.5%
(229/256) for ertapenem and 91.1% (204/224) for ceftriaxone.
Acute Pelvic Infections Including Endomyometritis, Septic
Abortion and Post-Surgical Gynecological Infections
Ertapenem was evaluated in adults for the treatment of
acute pelvic infections in a randomized, double-blind, non-inferiority clinical
trial. This trial compared ertapenem (1 g intravenously once a day) with
piperacillin/tazobactam (3.375 g intravenously every 6 hours) for 3 to 10 days
and enrolled 412 patients including 350 patients with obstetric/postpartum
infections and 45 patients with septic abortion. The clinical success rates in
the clinically evaluable population at 2 to 4 weeks posttherapy (test-of-cure)
were 93.9% (153/163) for ertapenem and 91.5% (140/153) for
piperacillin/tazobactam.
Prophylaxis of Surgical Site Infections Following
Elective Colorectal Surgery
Ertapenem was evaluated in adults for prophylaxis of
surgical site infection following elective colorectal surgery in a multicenter,
randomized, double-blind, non-inferiority clinical trial. This trial compared a
single intravenous dose of ertapenem (1 g) versus cefotetan (2 g) administered
over 30 minutes, 1 hour before elective colorectal surgery. Test-of-prophylaxis
was defined as no evidence of surgical site infection, postoperative anastomotic
leak, or unexplained antibiotic use in the clinically evaluable population up
to and including at the 4-week posttreatment follow-up visit. The trial
included 500 patients randomized to ertapenem and 502 patients randomized to
cefotetan. The modified intent-to-treat (MITT) population consisted of 451
ertapenem patients and 450 cefotetan patients and included all patients who
were randomized, treated, and underwent elective colorectal surgery with
adequate bowel preparation. The clinically evaluable population was a subset of
the MITT population and consisted of patients who received a complete dose of
study therapy no more than two hours prior to surgical incision and no more
than six hours before surgical closure. Clinically evaluable patients had sufficient
information to determine outcome at the 4-week follow-up assessment and had no
confounding factors that interfered with the assessment of that outcome.
Examples of confounding factors included prior or concomitant antibiotic
violations, the need for a second surgical procedure during the study period,
and identification of a distant site infection with concomitant antibiotic
administration and no evidence of subsequent wound infection. Three-hundred
forty-six (346) patients randomized to ertapenem and 339 patients randomized to
cefotetan were clinically evaluable. The prophylactic success rates at 4 weeks
posttreatment in the clinically evaluable population were 70.5% (244/346) for
ertapenem and 57.2% (194/339) for cefotetan (difference 13.3%, [95% C.I.: 6.1,
20.4], p < 0.001). Prophylaxis failure due to surgical site infections
occurred in 18.2% (63/346) ertapenem patients and 31.0% (105/339) cefotetan
patients. Post-operative anastomotic leak occurred in 2.9% (10/346) ertapenem
patients and 4.1% (14/339) cefotetan patients. Unexplained antibiotic use
occurred in 8.4% (29/346) ertapenem patients and 7.7% (26/339) cefotetan
patients. Though patient numbers were small in some subgroups, in general,
clinical response rates by age, gender, and race were consistent with the
results found in the clinically evaluable population. In the MITT analysis, the
prophylactic success rates at 4 weeks posttreatment were 58.3% (263/451) for
ertapenem and 48.9% (220/450) for cefotetan (difference 9.4%, [95% C.I.: 2.9, 15.9],
p=0.002). A statistically significant difference favoring ertapenem over
cefotetan with respect to the primary endpoint has been observed at a
significance level of 5% in this trial. A second adequate and well-controlled
trial to confirm these findings has not been conducted; therefore, the clinical
superiority of ertapenem over cefotetan has not been demonstrated.
Pediatric Patients
Ertapenem was evaluated in pediatric patients 3 months to
17 years of age in two randomized, multicenter clinical trials.
The first trial enrolled 404 patients and compared
ertapenem (15 mg/kg intravenous (IV) every 12 hours in patients 3 months to 12
years of age, and 1 g IV once a day in patients 13 to 17 years of age) to
ceftriaxone (50 mg/kg/day IV in two divided doses in patients 3 months to 12
years of age and 50 mg/kg/day IV as a single daily dose in patients 13 to 17
years of age) for the treatment of complicated urinary tract infection (UTI),
skin and soft tissue infection (SSTI), or community-acquired pneumonia (CAP).
Both regimens allowed the option to switch to oral amoxicillin/clavulanate for
a total of up to 14 days of treatment (parenteral and oral). The
microbiological success rates in the evaluable per protocol (EPP) analysis in
patients treated for UTI were 87.0% (40/46) for ertapenem and 90.0% (18/20) for
ceftriaxone. The clinical success rates in the EPP analysis in patients treated
for SSTI were 95.5% (64/67) for ertapenem and 100% (26/26) for ceftriaxone, and
in patients treated for CAP were 96.1% (74/77) for ertapenem and 96.4% (27/28)
for ceftriaxone.
The second trial enrolled 112 patients and compared
ertapenem (15 mg/kg IV every 12 hours in patients 3 months to 12 years of age,
and 1 g IV once a day in patients 13 to 17 years of age) to
ticarcillin/clavulanate (50 mg/kg for patients < 60 kg or 3.0 g for patients
> 60 kg, 4 or 6 times a day) up to 14 days for the treatment of complicated
intra-abdominal infections (IAI) and acute pelvic infections (API). In patients
treated for IAI (primarily patients with perforated or complicated
appendicitis), the clinical success rates were 83.7% (36/43) for ertapenem and
63.6% (7/11) for ticarcillin/clavulanate in the EPP analysis. In patients
treated for API (post-operative or spontaneous obstetrical endomyometritis, or
septic abortion), the clinical success rates were 100% (23/23) for ertapenem
and 100% (4/4) for ticarcillin/clavulanate in the EPP analysis.
REFERENCES
1. Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI).
Methods for Dilution Antimicrobial Susceptibility Tests for Bacteria that Grow
Aerobically. 9th Edition; CLSI Document M7-A9. CLSI, W ayne, PA, 2012.
2. Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI).
Performance Standards for Antimicrobial Disk Susceptibility Tests. 11th Edition;
CLSI Document M2-A11. CLSI, W ayne, PA, 2012.
3. Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI). Methods
for Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing of Anaerobic Bacteria – 7th Edition;
CLSI Document M11-A7. CLSI, W ayne, PA, 2007.
4. Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI).
Performance Standards for Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing – 22nd Informational
Supplement. CLSI Document M100-S22. CLSI, W ayne, PA, 2012.
5. Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI,
formerly NCCLS). Performance Standards for Antimicrobial Susceptibility of
Anaerobic Bacteria; Informational Supplement. CLSI Document M11-S1. CLSI, W
ayne, PA, 2010.