Clinical Pharmacology for Intelence
Mechanism Of Action
Etravirine is an antiretroviral drug [see Microbiology].
Pharmacodynamics
Cardiac Electrophysiology
In a thorough QT/QTc study in 41 healthy subjects, INTELENCE 200 mg twice daily or 400 mg once daily did not affect the QT/QTc interval.
Pharmacokinetics
The pharmacokinetic properties of INTELENCE were determined in healthy adult subjects and in treatment-experienced HIV-1-infected adult and pediatric subjects. The systemic exposures (AUC) to etravirine were lower in HIV-1-infected subjects (Table 5) than in healthy subjects.
Table 5: Population Pharmacokinetic Estimates of Etravirine 200 mg Twice Daily in HIV-1-Infected Adult Subjects (Integrated Data from Phase 3 Trials at Week 48)*
| Parameter |
Etravirine
N=575 |
| AUC12h (ng•h/mL) |
| Geometric mean ± standard deviation |
4522±4710 |
| Median (range) |
4380 (458-59084) |
| C0h (ng/mL) |
| Geometric mean ± standard deviation |
297±391 |
| Median (range) |
298 (2-4852) |
| * All HIV-1-infected subjects enrolled in Phase 3 clinical trials received darunavir/ritonavir 600/100 mg twice daily as part of their background regimen. Therefore, the pharmacokinetic parameter estimates shown in Table 5 account for reductions in the pharmacokinetic parameters of etravirine due to co-administration of INTELENCE with darunavir/ritonavir. |
Note: The median protein binding adjusted EC50 for MT4 cells infected with HIV-1/IIIB in vitro equals 4 ng/mL.
Absorption And Bioavailability
Following oral administration, etravirine was absorbed with a Tmax of about 2.5 to 4 hours. The absolute oral bioavailability of INTELENCE is unknown.
In healthy subjects, the absorption of etravirine is not affected by co-administration of oral ranitidine or omeprazole, drugs that increase gastric pH.
Effects Of Food On Oral Absorption
The systemic exposure (AUC) to etravirine was decreased by about 50% when INTELENCE was administered under fasting conditions, as compared to when INTELENCE was administered following a meal. Within the range of meals studied, the systemic exposures to etravirine were similar. The total caloric content of the various meals evaluated ranged from 345 kilocalories (17 grams fat) to 1160 kilocalories (70 grams fat).
Distribution
Etravirine is about 99.9% bound to plasma proteins, primarily to albumin (99.6%) and alpha 1-acid glycoprotein (97.66% to 99.02%) in vitro. The distribution of etravirine into compartments other than plasma (e.g., cerebrospinal fluid, genital tract secretions) has not been evaluated in humans.
Metabolism
In vitro experiments with human liver microsomes (HLMs) indicate that etravirine primarily undergoes metabolism by CYP3A, CYP2C9, and CYP2C19 enzymes. The major metabolites, formed by methyl hydroxylation of the dimethylbenzonitrile moiety, were at least 90% less active than etravirine against wild-type HIV in cell culture.
Elimination
After single dose oral administration of 800 mg 14C-etravirine, 93.7% and 1.2% of the administered dose of 14C-etravirine was recovered in the feces and urine, respectively. Unchanged etravirine accounted for 81.2% to 86.4% of the administered dose in feces. Unchanged etravirine was not detected in urine. The mean (± standard deviation) terminal elimination half-life of etravirine was about 41 (± 20) hours.
Specific Populations
Geriatric Patients
Population pharmacokinetic analysis in HIV-infected subjects showed that etravirine pharmacokinetics are not considerably different within the age range (18 to 77 years) evaluated [see Use In Specific Populations].
Pediatric Patients
The pharmacokinetics of etravirine in 115 treatment-experienced HIV-1-infected pediatric subjects, 2 years to less than 18 years of age showed that the administered weight-based dosages resulted in etravirine exposure comparable to that in adults receiving INTELENCE 200 mg twice daily [see DOSAGE AND ADMINISTRATION]. The pharmacokinetic parameters for etravirine (AUC12h and C0h) are summarized in Table 6.
Table 6: Pharmacokinetic Parameters for Etravirine in Treatment-Experienced HIV-1-Infected Pediatric Subjects 2 Years to Less Than 18 Years of Age (TMC125-C213 [Population PK] and TMC125-C234/P1090)
| Study |
TMC125-C213 |
TMC125-C234/ IMPAACT P1090 |
| Age Range (years) |
(6 years to less than 18 years) |
(2 years to less than 6 years) |
| Parameter |
N=101 |
N=14 |
| AUC12h (ng•h/mL) |
| Geometric mean ± standard deviation |
3742±4314 |
3504 ± 2923 |
| Median (range) |
4499 (62-28865) |
3579 (1221-11815) |
| C0h (ng/mL) |
| Geometric mean ± standard deviation |
205 ± 342 |
183 ± 240 |
| Median (range) |
287 (2-2276) |
162 (54-908) |
The pharmacokinetics and dose of etravirine in pediatric subjects less than 2 years of age have not been established [see Use In Specific Populations].
Male And Female Patients
No significant pharmacokinetic differences have been observed between males and females.
Racial Or Ethnic Groups
Population pharmacokinetic analysis of etravirine in HIV-infected subjects did not show an effect of race on exposure to etravirine.
Patients With Renal Impairment
The pharmacokinetics of etravirine have not been studied in patients with renal impairment. The results from a mass balance study with 14C-etravirine showed that less than 1.2% of the administered dose of etravirine is excreted in the urine as metabolites. No unchanged drug was detected in the urine. As etravirine is highly bound to plasma proteins, it is unlikely that it will be significantly removed by hemodialysis or peritoneal dialysis [see Use In Specific Populations].
Patients With Hepatic Impairment
Etravirine is primarily metabolized by the liver. The steady state pharmacokinetic parameters of etravirine were similar after multiple dose administration of INTELENCE to subjects with normal hepatic function (16 subjects), mild hepatic impairment (Child-Pugh Class A, 8 subjects), and moderate hepatic impairment (Child-Pugh Class B, 8 subjects). The effect of severe hepatic impairment on the pharmacokinetics of etravirine has not been evaluated [see Use In Specific Populations].
Pregnancy And Postpartum
After intake of INTELENCE 200 mg twice daily in combination with other antiretroviral agents (13 subjects with 2 NRTIs, 1 subject with 2 NRTIs + lopinavir + ritonavir, 1 subject with 2 NRTIs + raltegravir), based on intra-individual comparison, the Cmax and AUC12h of total etravirine were 23 to 42% higher during pregnancy compared with postpartum (6-12 weeks). The Cmin of total etravirine was 78 to 125% higher during pregnancy compared with postpartum (6-12 weeks), while two subjects had Cmin <10 ng/mL in the postpartum period (6-12 weeks) [Cmin of total etravirine was 11 to 16% higher when these 2 subjects are excluded] (see Table 7) [see Use In Specific Populations]. Increased etravirine exposures during pregnancy are not considered clinically significant. The protein binding of etravirine was similar (>99%) during the second trimester, third trimester, and postpartum period.
Table 7: Pharmacokinetic Results of Total Etravirine After Administration of Etravirine 200 mg Twice Daily as Part of an Antiretroviral Regimen, During the 2nd Trimester of Pregnancy, the 3rd Trimester of Pregnancy, and Postpartum
| Parameter Mean ± SD (median) |
Postpartum
N=10 |
2nd Trimester
N=13 |
3rd Trimester
N=10* |
| Cmin, ng/mL |
269 ± 182 (284)† |
383 ± 210 (346) |
349 ± 103 (371) |
| Cmax, ng/mL |
569 ± 261 (528) |
774 ± 300 (828) |
785 ± 238 (694) |
| AUC12h, ng•h/mL |
5004±2521 (5246) |
6617 ± 2766 (6836) |
6846 ± 1482 (6028) |
* n=9 for AUC12h
† Two subjects had Cmin <10 ng/mL, Cmin was 334 ± 135 (315) in the postpartum period when these subjects were excluded from the descriptive analysis (N=8). |
Patients With Hepatitis B And/Or Hepatitis C Virus Co-Infection
Population pharmacokinetic analysis of the TMC125-C206 and TMC125-C216 trials showed reduced clearance for etravirine in HIV-1-infected subjects with hepatitis B and/or C virus co-infection. Based upon the safety profile of INTELENCE [see ADVERSE REACTIONS], no dose adjustment is necessary in patients co-infected with hepatitis B and/or C virus.
Drug Interactions
Etravirine is a substrate of CYP3A, CYP2C9, and CYP2C19. Therefore, co-administration of INTELENCE with drugs that induce or inhibit CYP3A, CYP2C9, and CYP2C19 may alter the therapeutic effect or adverse reaction profile of INTELENCE.
Etravirine is an inducer of CYP3A and inhibitor of CYP2C9, CYP2C19 and P-gp. Therefore, co-administration of drugs that are substrates of CYP3A, CYP2C9 and CYP2C19 or are transported by P-gp with INTELENCE may alter the therapeutic effect or adverse reaction profile of the co-administered drug(s).
Drug interaction studies were performed with INTELENCE and other drugs likely to be co-administered and some drugs commonly used as probes for pharmacokinetic interactions. The effects of co-administration of other drugs on the AUC, Cmax, and Cmin values of etravirine are summarized in Table 8 (effect of other drugs on INTELENCE). The effect of co-administration of INTELENCE on the AUC, Cmax, and Cmin values of other drugs are summarized in Table 9 (effect of INTELENCE on other drugs). For information regarding clinical recommendations, [see DRUG INTERACTIONS].
Table 8: Drug Interactions: Pharmacokinetic Parameters for Etravirine in the Presence of Co-administered Drugs
| Co-administered Drug |
Dose/Schedule of Co-administered Drug |
N |
Exposure |
Mean Ratio of Etravirine Pharmacokinetic Parameters 90% CI; No Effect = 1.00 |
| Cmax |
AUC |
Cmin |
| Co-administration with HIV protease inhibitors (PIs) |
| Atazanavir |
400 mg once daily |
14 |
↑ |
1.47
(1.36-1.59) |
1.50
(1.41-1.59) |
1.58
(1.46-1.70) |
| Atazanavir/ ritonavir* |
300/100 mg once daily |
14 |
↑ |
1.30
(1.17-1.44) |
1.30
(1.18-1.44) |
1.26
(1.12-1.42) |
| Darunavir/ ritonavir |
600/100 mg twice daily |
14 |
↓ |
0.68
(0.57-0.82) |
0.63
(0.54-0.73) |
0.51
(0.44-0.61) |
Lopinavir/ ritonavir
(tablet) |
400/100 mg twice daily |
16 |
↓ |
0.70
(0.64-0.78) |
0.65
(0.59-0.71) |
0.55
(0.49-0.62) |
| Ritonavir |
600 mg twice daily |
1 1 |
↓ |
0.68
(0.55-0.85) |
0.54
(0.41-0.73) |
N.A. |
| Saquinavir/ ritonavir |
1000/100 mg twice daily |
1 4 |
↓ |
0.63
(0.53-0.75) |
0.67
(0.56-0.80) |
0.71
(0.58-0.87) |
| Tipranavir/ ritonavir |
500/200 mg twice daily |
1 9 |
↓ |
0.29
(0.22-0.40) |
0.24
(0.18-0.33) |
0.18
(0.13-0.25) |
Co-administration with nucleoside reverse transcri)tase inhibitors
(NRTIs) |
| Didanosine |
400 mg once daily |
15 |
↔ |
1.16
(1.02-1.32) |
1.11
(0.99-1.25) |
1.05
(0.93-1.18) |
| Tenofovir disoproxil fumarate |
300 mg once daily |
23 |
↓ |
0.81
(0.75-0.88) |
0.81
(0.75-0.88) |
0.82
(0.73-0.91) |
| Co-administration with CCR5 antagonists |
| Maraviroc |
300 mg twice daily |
14 |
↔ |
1.05
(0.95-1.17) |
1.06
(0.99-1.14) |
1.08
(0.98-1.19) |
Maraviroc
(when coadministered with darunavir/ ritonavir† |
150/600/100 mg twice daily |
10 |
↔ |
1.08
(0.98-1.20) |
1.00
(0.86-1.15) |
0.81
(0.65-1.01) |
| Co-administration with integrase strand transfer inhibitors |
| Raltegravir |
400 mg twice daily |
19 |
↔ |
1.04
(0.97-1.12) |
1.10
(1.03-1.16) |
1.17
(1.10-1.26) |
| Co-administration with other drugs |
| Artemether/ lumefantrine |
80/480 mg, 6 doses at 0, 8, 24, 36, 48, and 60 hours |
14 |
↔ |
1.11
(1.06-1.17) |
1.10
(1.06-1.15) |
1.08
(1.04-1.14) |
| Atorvastatin |
40 mg once daily |
16 |
↔ |
0.97
(0.93-1.02) |
1.02
(0.97-1.07) |
1.10
(1.02-1.19) |
| Clarithromycin |
500 mg twice daily |
15 |
↑ |
1.46
(1.38-1.56) |
1.42
(1.34-1.50) |
1.46
(1.36-1.58) |
| Fluconazole |
200 mg once daily in the morning |
16 |
↑ |
1.75
(1.60-1.91) |
1.86
(1.73-2.00) |
2.09
(1.90-2.31) |
| Omeprazole |
40 mg once daily |
18 |
↑ |
1.17
(0.96-1.43) |
1.41
(1.22-1.62) |
N.A. |
| Paroxetine |
20 mg once daily |
16 |
↔ |
1.05
(0.96-1.15) |
1.01
(0.93-1.10) |
1.07
(0.98-1.17) |
| Ranitidine |
150 mg twice daily |
18 |
↓ |
0.94
(0.75-1.17) |
0.86
(0.76-0.97) |
N.A. |
| Rifabutin |
300 mg once daily |
12 |
↓ |
0.63
(0.53-0.74) |
0.63
(0.54-0.74) |
0.65
(0.56-0.74) |
| Voriconazole |
200 mg twice daily |
16 |
↑ |
1.26
(1.16-1.38) |
1.36
(1.25-1.47) |
1.52
(1.41-1.64) |
CI = Confidence Interval; N = number of subjects with data; N.A. = not available; ↑ = increase; ↓ = decrease; ↔= no change
* The systemic exposure of etravirine when co-administered with atazanavir/ritonavir in HIV infected subjects is similar to exposures of etravirine observed in the Phase 3 trials after co-administration of INTELENCE and darunavir/ritonavir (as part of the background regimen).
† The reference for etravirine exposure is the pharmacokinetic parameters of etravirine in the presence of darunavir/ritonavir. |
Table 9: Drug Interactions: Pharmacokinetic Parameters for Co-administered Drugs in the Presence of INTELENCE
| Co-administered Drug |
Dose/Schedule of Coadministered Drug |
N |
Exposure |
Mean Ratio of Co-administered Drug Pharmacokinetic Parameters 90% CI; No effect = 1.00 |
| Cmax |
AUC |
Cmin |
| Co-administration with HIV protease inhibitors (PIs) |
| Atazanavir |
400 mg once daily |
14 |
↓ |
0.97
(0.73-1.29) |
0.83
(0.63-1.09) |
0.53
(0.38-0.73) |
| Atazanavir/ ritonavir |
300/100 mg once daily |
13 |
↓ |
0.97
(0.89-1.05) |
0.86
(0.79-0.93) |
0.62
(0.55-0.71) |
| Atazanavir/ ritonavir* |
300/100 mg once daily |
20 |
↓ |
0.96
(0.80-1.16) |
0.96
(0.76-1.22) |
0.82
(0.55-1.22) |
| Darunavir/ ritonavir |
600/100 mg twice daily |
15 |
↔ |
1.11
(1.01-1.22) |
1.15
(1.05-1.26) |
1.02
(0.90-1.17) |
| Fosamprenavir/ ritonavir |
700/100 mg twice daily |
8 |
↑ |
1.62
(1.47-1.79) |
1.69
(1.53-1.86) |
1.77
(1.39-2.25) |
Lopinavir/ ritonavir
(tablet) |
400/100 mg twice daily |
16 |
↔ |
0.89
(0.82-0.96) |
0.87
(0.83-0.92) |
0.80
(0.73-0.88) |
| Saquinavir/ ritonavir |
1000/100 mg twice daily |
15 |
↔ |
1.00
(0.70-1.42) |
0.95
(0.64-1.42) |
0.80
(0.46-1.38) |
| Tipranavir/ ritonavir |
500/200 mg twice daily |
19 |
↑ |
1.14
(1.02-1.27) |
1.18
(1.03-1.36) |
1.24
(0.96-1.59) |
Co-administration with nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors
(NRTIs) |
| Didanosine |
400 mg once daily |
14 |
↔ |
0.91
(0.58-1.42) |
0.99
(0.79-1.25) |
N.A. |
| Tenofovir disoproxil fumarate |
300 mg once daily |
19 |
↔ |
1.15
(1.04-1.27) |
1.15
(1.09-1.21) |
1.19
(1.13-1.26) |
| Co-administration with CCR5 antagonists |
| Maraviroc |
300 mg twice daily |
14 |
↓ |
0.40
(0.28-0.57) |
0.47
(0.38-0.58) |
0.61
(0.53-0.71) |
Maraviroc
(when coadministered with darunavir/ ritonavir) t |
150/600/100 mg twice daily |
10 |
↑ |
1.77
(1.20-2.60) |
3.10
(2.57-3.74) |
5.27
(4.51-6.15) |
| Co-administration with integrase strand transfer inhibitors |
| Dolutegravir |
50 mg once daily |
16 |
↓ |
0.48
(0.43 to 0.54) |
0.29
(0.26 to 0.34) |
0.12
(0.09 to 0.16) |
Dolutegravir
(when co-administered with darunavir/ritonavir) |
50 mg once daily + 600/100 mg twice daily |
9 |
↓ |
0.88
(0.78 to 1.00) |
0.75
(0.69 to 0.81) |
0.63
(0.52 to 0.76) |
Dolutegravir
(when co-administered with lopinavir/ritonavir |
50 mg once daily + 400/100 mg twice daily |
8 |
↔ |
1.07
(1.02 to 1.13) |
1.11
(1.02 to 1.20) |
1.28
(1.13 to 1.45) |
| Raltegravir |
400 mg twice daily |
19 |
↓ |
0.89
(0.68-1.15) |
0.90
(0.68-1.18) |
0.66
(0.34-1.26) |
| Co-administration with other drugs |
| Artemether |
80/480 mg, 6 doses at 0, 8, 24, 36, 48, and 60 hours |
15 |
↓ |
0.72
(0.55-0.94) |
0.62
(0.48-0.80) |
0.82
(0.67-1.01) |
| Dihydroartemisinin |
|
15 |
↓ |
0.84
(0.71-0.99) |
0.85
(0.75-0.97) |
0.83
(0.71-0.97) |
| Lumefantrine |
|
15 |
↓ |
1.07
(0.94-1.23) |
0.87
(0.77-0.98) |
0.97
(0.83-1.15) |
| Atorvastatin |
40 mg once daily |
16 |
↓ |
1.04
(0.84-1.30) |
0.63
(0.58-0.68) |
N.A. |
| 2-hydroxy- atorvastatin |
|
16 |
↑ |
1.76
(1.60-1.94) |
1.27
(1.19-1.36) |
N.A. |
| Buprenorphine Norbuprenorphine |
Individual dose regimen ranging from 4/1 mg to 16/4 mg once daily |
16 |
↓ |
0.89
(0.76-1.05) |
0.75
(0.66-0.84) |
0.60
(0.52-0.68) |
| 16 |
↔ |
1.08
(0.95-1.23) |
0.88
(0.81-0.96) |
0.76
(0.67-0.87) |
| Clarithromycin |
500 mg twice daily |
15 |
↓ |
0.66
(0.57-0.77) |
0.61
(0.53-0.69) |
0.47
(0.38-0.57) |
| 14-hydroxy- clarithromycin |
|
15 |
↑ |
1.33
(1.13-1.56) |
1.21
(1.05-1.39) |
1.05
(0.90-1.22) |
| Digoxin |
0.5 mg single dose |
16 |
↑ |
1.19
(0.96-1.49) |
1.18
(0.90-1.56) |
N.A. |
| Ethinylestradiol |
0.035 mg once daily |
16 |
↑ |
1.33
(1.21-1.46) |
1.22
(1.13-1.31) |
1.09
(1.01-1.18) |
| Norethindrone |
1 mg once daily |
16 |
↔ |
1.05
(0.98-1.12) |
0.95
(0.90-0.99) |
0.78
(0.68-0.90) |
| Fluconazole |
200 mg once daily in the morning |
15 |
↔ |
0.92
(0.85-1.00) |
0.94
(0.88-1.01) |
0.91
(0.84-0.98) |
| R(-) Methadone |
Individual dose regimen ranging from 60 to 130 mg/day |
16 |
↔ |
1.02
(0.96-1.09) |
1.06
(0.99-1.13) |
1.10
(1.02-1.19) |
| S(+) Methadone |
|
16 |
↔ |
0.89
(0.83-0.97) |
0.89
(0.82-0.96) |
0.89
(0.81-0.98) |
| Paroxetine |
20 mg once daily |
16 |
↔ |
1.06
(0.95-1.20) |
1.03
(0.90-1.18) |
0.87
(0.75-1.02) |
| Rifabutin |
300 mg once daily |
12 |
↓ |
0.90
(0.78-1.03) |
0.83
(0.75-0.94) |
0.76
(0.66-0.87) |
| 25-0- desacetylrifabutin |
300 mg once daily |
12 |
↓ |
0.85
(0.72-1.00) |
0.83
(0.74-0.92) |
0.78
(0.70-0.87) |
| Sildenafil |
50 mg single dose |
15 |
↓ |
0.55
(0.40-0.75) |
0.43
(0.36-0.51) |
N.A. |
| N-desmethyl- sildenafil |
|
15 |
↓ |
0.75
(0.59-0.96) |
0.59
(0.52-0.68) |
N.A. |
| Voriconazole |
200 mg twice daily |
14 |
↑ |
0.95
(0.75-1.21) |
1.14
(0.88-1.47) |
1.23
(0.87-1.75) |
CI = Confidence Interval; N = number of subjects with data; N.A. = not available; ↑ = increase; ↓ = decrease; ↔= no change
* HIV-infected subjects
† compared to maraviroc 150 mg twice daily |
Microbiology
Mechanism Of Action
Etravirine is an NNRTI of HIV-1. Etravirine binds directly to reverse transcriptase (RT) and blocks the RNA-dependent and DNA-dependent DNA polymerase activities by causing a disruption of the enzyme's catalytic site. Etravirine does not inhibit the human DNA polymerases α, β, and γ.
Antiviral Activity In Cell Culture
Etravirine exhibited activity against laboratory strains and clinical isolates of wild-type HIV-1 in acutely infected T-cell lines, human peripheral blood mononuclear cells, and human monocytes/macrophages with median EC50 values ranging from 0.9 to 5.5 nM (i.e., 0.4 to 2.4 ng/mL). Etravirine demonstrated antiviral activity in cell culture against a broad panel of HIV-1 group M isolates (subtype A, B, C, D, E, F, G) with EC50 values ranging from 0.29 to 1.65 nM and EC50 values ranging from 11.5 to 21.7 nM against group O primary isolates. Etravirine did not show antagonism when studied in combination with the following antiretroviral drugs—the NNRTIs delavirdine, efavirenz, and nevirapine; the N(t)RTIs abacavir, didanosine, emtricitabine, lamivudine, stavudine, tenofovir, and zidovudine; the PIs amprenavir, atazanavir, darunavir, indinavir, lopinavir, nelfinavir, ritonavir, saquinavir, and tipranavir; the gp41 fusion inhibitor ENF; the integrase strand transfer inhibitor raltegravir and the CCR5 co-receptor antagonist maraviroc.
Resistance
In Cell Culture
Etravirine-resistant strains were selected in cell culture originating from wild-type HIV-1 of different origins and subtypes, as well as NNRTI resistant HIV-1. Development of reduced susceptibility to etravirine typically required more than one substitution in reverse transcriptase of which the following were observed most frequently: L100I, E138K, E138G, V179I, Y181C, and M230I.
In Treatment-Experienced Subjects
In the Phase 3 trials TMC125-C206 and TMC125-C216, substitutions that developed most commonly in subjects with virologic failure at Week 48 to the INTELENCE-containing regimen were V179F, V179I, and Y181C which usually emerged in a background of multiple other NNRTI resistance-associated substitutions. In all the trials conducted with INTELENCE in HIV-1 infected subjects, the following substitutions emerged most commonly: L100I, E138G, V179F, V179I, Y181C and H221Y. Other NNRTI-resistance-associated substitutions which emerged on etravirine treatment in less than 10% of the virologic failure isolates included K101E/H/P, K103N/R, V106I/M, V108I, Y181I, Y188L, V189I, G190S/C, N348I and R356K. The emergence of NNRTI substitutions on etravirine treatment contributed to decreased susceptibility to etravirine with a median fold-change in etravirine susceptibility of 40-fold from reference and a median fold-change of 6-fold from baseline.
Cross-Resistance
Cross-resistance among NNRTIs has been observed. Cross-resistance to delavirdine, efavirenz, and/or nevirapine is expected after virologic failure with an etravirine-containing regimen. Virologic failure on a rilpivirine-containing regimen with development of rilpivirine resistance is likely to result in cross-resistance to etravirine (see Treatment-Naïve HIV-1-Infected Subjects in the Phase 3 Trials for EDURANT (rilpivirine) below). Cross-resistance to etravirine has been observed after virologic failure on a doravirine-containing regimen with development of doravirine resistance. Some NNRTI-resistant viruses are susceptible to etravirine, but genotypic and phenotypic testing should guide the use of etravirine (see Baseline Genotype/Phenotype and Virologic Outcome Analyses below).
Site-Directed NNRTI Mutant Virus
Etravirine showed antiviral activity against 55 of 65 HIV-1 strains (85%) with single amino acid substitutions at RT positions associated with NNRTI resistance, including the most commonly found K103N. The single amino acid substitutions associated with an etravirine reduction in susceptibility greater than 3-fold were K101A, K101P, K101Q, E138G, E138Q, Y181C, Y181I, Y181T, Y181V, and M230L, and of these, the greatest reductions were Y181I (13-fold change in EC50 value) and Y181V (17-fold change in EC50 value). Mutant strains containing a single NNRTI resistance-associated substitution (K101P, K101Q, E138Q, or M230L) had cross-resistance between etravirine and efavirenz. The majority (39 of 61; 64%) of the NNRTI mutant viruses with 2 or 3 amino acid substitutions associated with NNRTI resistance had decreased susceptibility to etravirine (fold-change greater than 3). The highest levels of resistance to etravirine were observed for HIV-1 harboring a combination of substitutions V179F + Y181C (187 fold-change), V179F + Y181I (123 fold-change), or V179F + Y181C + F227C (888 fold-change).
Clinical Isolates
Etravirine retained a fold-change less than or equal to 3 against 60% of 6171 NNRTI-resistant clinical isolates. In the same panel, the proportion of clinical isolates resistant to delavirdine, efavirenz and/or nevirapine (defined as a fold-change above their respective biological cutoff values in the assay) was 79%, 87%, and 95%, respectively. In TMC125-C206 and TMC125-C216, 34% of the baseline isolates had decreased susceptibility to etravirine (fold-change greater than 3) and 60%, 69%, and 78% of all baseline isolates were resistant to delavirdine, efavirenz, and nevirapine, respectively. Of subjects who received etravirine and were virologic failures in TMC125-C206 and TMC125-C216, 90%, 84%, and 96% of viral isolates obtained at the time of treatment failure were resistant to delavirdine, efavirenz, and nevirapine, respectively.
Treatment-Naïve HIV-1-Infected Subjects In The Phase 3 Trials For EDURANT (Rilpivirine)
There are currently no clinical data available on the use of etravirine in subjects who experienced virologic failure on a rilpivirine-containing regimen. However, in the rilpivirine adult clinical development program, there was evidence of phenotypic cross-resistance between rilpivirine and etravirine. In the pooled analyses of the Phase 3 clinical trials for rilpivirine, 38 rilpivirine virologic failure subjects had evidence of HIV-1 strains with genotypic and phenotypic resistance to rilpivirine. Of these subjects, 89% (34 subjects) of virologic failure isolates were cross-resistant to etravirine based on phenotype data. Consequently, it can be inferred that cross-resistance to etravirine is likely after virologic failure and development of rilpivirine resistance. Refer to the prescribing information for EDURANT (rilpivirine) for further information.
Baseline Genotype/Phenotype And Virologic Outcome Analyses
In TMC125-C206 and TMC125-C216, the presence at baseline of the substitutions L100I, E138A, I167V, V179D, V179F, Y181I, Y181V, or G190S was associated with a decreased virologic response to etravirine. Additional substitutions associated with a decreased virologic response to etravirine when in the presence of 3 or more additional 2008 IAS-USA defined NNRTI substitutions include A98G, K101H, K103R, V106I, V179T, and Y181C. The presence of K103N, which was the most prevalent NNRTI substitution in TMC125-C206 and TMC125-C216 at baseline, did not affect the response in the INTELENCE arm. Overall, response rates to etravirine decreased as the number of baseline NNRTI substitutions increased (shown as the proportion of subjects achieving viral load less than 50 plasma HIV RNA copies/mL at Week 48) (Table 10).
Table 10: Proportion of Subjects With Less Than 50 HIV-1 RNA Copies/mL at Week 48 by Baseline Number of IAS-USA-Defined NNRTI Substitutions* in the Non-VF Excluded Population of the Pooled TMC125-C206 and TMC125-C216
| # IAS-USA-Defined NNRTI substitutions* |
Etravirine
N=561 |
| Re-used/not used ENF |
de novo ENF |
| All ranges |
61% (254/418) |
76% (109/143) |
| 0 |
68% (52/76) |
95% (20/21) |
| 1 |
67% (72/107) |
77% (24/31) |
| 2 |
64% (75/118) |
86% (38/44) |
| 3 |
55% (36/65) |
62% (16/26) |
| ≥ 4 |
37% (19/52) |
52% (11/21) |
|
Placebo
N=592 |
| All ranges |
34% (147/435) |
59% (93/157) |
ENF: enfuvirtide
* 2008 IAS-USA defined substitutions = V90I, A98G, L100I, K101E/H/P, K103N, V106A/I/M, V108I, E138A, V179D/F/T, Y181C/I/V, Y188C/H/L, G190A/S, P225H, M230L |
Response rates assessed by baseline etravirine phenotype are shown in Table 11. These baseline phenotype groups are based on the select subject populations in TMC125-C206 and TMC125-C216 and are not meant to represent definitive clinical susceptibility breakpoints for INTELENCE. The data are provided to give clinicians information on the likelihood of virologic success based on pre-treatment susceptibility to etravirine in treatment-experienced patients.
Table 11: Proportion of Subjects With Less Than 50 HIV-1 RNA Copies/mL at Week 48 by Baseline Phenotype and ENF Use in the Pooled TMC125-C206 and TMC125-C216*
| Fold Change |
Etravirine
N=559 |
| Re-used/not used ENF |
de novo ENF |
Clinical response range |
| All ranges |
61% (253/416) |
76% (109/143) |
Overall Response |
| 0-3 |
69% (188/274) |
83% (75/90) |
Higher than Overall Response |
| > 3-13 |
50% (39/78) |
66% (25/38) |
Lower than Overall Response |
| > 13 |
41% (26/64) |
60% (9/15) |
Lower than Overall Response |
|
Placebo
N=583 |
| All ranges |
34% (145/429) |
60% (92/154) |
|
ENF: enfuvirtide
* Non-VF excluded analysis |
The proportion of virologic responders (viral load less than 50 HIV-1 RNA copies/mL) by the phenotypic susceptibility score (PSS) of the background therapy, including ENF, is shown in Table 12.
Table 12: Virologic Response (Viral Load Less Than 50 HIV-1 RNA Copies/mL) at Week 48 by Phenotypic Susceptibility Score (PSS) in the Non-VF Excluded Population of TMC125-C206 and TMC125-C216
| PSS* |
INTELENCE + BR
N=559 |
Placebo + BR
N=586 |
| 0 |
43% (40/93) |
5% (5/95) |
| 1 |
61% (125/206) |
28% (64/226) |
| 2 |
77% (114/149) |
59% (97/165) |
| ≥ 3 |
75% (83/111) |
72% (72/100) |
| * The phenotypic susceptibility score (PSS) was defined as the total number of active antiretroviral drugs in the background therapy to which a subject’s baseline viral isolate showed sensitivity in phenotypic resistance tests. Each drug in the background therapy was scored as a ‘1’ or ‘0’ based on whether the viral isolate was considered susceptible or resistant to that drug, respectively. In the calculation of the PSS, darunavir was counted as a sensitive antiretroviral if the FC was less than or equal to 10; ENF was counted as a sensitive antiretroviral if it had not been used previously. INTELENCE was not included in this calculation. |
Clinical Studies
Treatment-Experienced Adult Subjects
The clinical efficacy of INTELENCE is derived from the analyses of 48-week data from 2 ongoing, randomized, double-blinded, placebo-controlled, Phase 3 trials, TMC125-C206 and TMC125-C216 (DUET-1 and DUET-2) in subjects with 1 or more NNRTI resistance-associated substitutions. These trials are identical in design and the results below are pooled data from the two trials.
TMC125-C206 and TMC125-C216 are Phase 3 studies designed to evaluate the safety and antiretroviral activity of INTELENCE in combination with a background regimen (BR) as compared to placebo in combination with a BR. Eligible subjects were treatment-experienced HIV-1-infected subjects with plasma HIV-1 RNA greater than 5000 copies/mL while on an antiretroviral regimen for at least 8 weeks. In addition, subjects had 1 or more NNRTI resistance-associated substitutions at screening or from prior genotypic analysis, and 3 or more of the following primary PI substitutions at screening: D30N, V32I, L33F, M46I/L, I47A/V, G48V, I50L/V, V82A/F/L/S/T, I84V, N88S, or L90M. Randomization was stratified by the intended use of ENF in the BR, previous use of darunavir/ritonavir, and screening viral load. Virologic response was defined as HIV-1 RNA less than 50 copies/mL at Week 48.
All study subjects received darunavir/ritonavir as part of their BR, and at least 2 other investigator-selected antiretroviral drugs (N[t]RTIs with or without ENF). Of INTELENCE-treated subjects, 25.5% used ENF for the first time (de novo) and 20.0% re-used ENF. Of placebo-treated subjects, 26.5% used de novo ENF and 20.4% re-used ENF.
In the pooled analysis for TMC125-C206 and TMC125-C216, demographics and baseline characteristics were balanced between the INTELENCE arm and the placebo arm (Table 13). Table 13 displays selected demographic and baseline disease characteristics of the subjects in the INTELENCE and placebo arms.
Table 13: Demographic and Baseline Disease Characteristics of Subjects(Pooled Analysis TMC125-C206 and TMC125-C216)—
|
INTELENCE + BR
N=599 |
Placebo + BR
N=604 |
| Demographic characteristics |
| Median age, years (range) |
46 (18-77) |
45 (18-72) |
| Sex |
| Male |
90.0% |
88.6% |
| Female |
10.0% |
11.4% |
| Race |
| White |
70.1% |
69.8% |
| Black |
13.2% |
13.0% |
| Hispanic |
11.3% |
12.2% |
| Asian |
1.3% |
0.6% |
| Other |
4.1% |
4.5% |
| Baseline disease characteristics |
| Median baseline plasma HIV-1 RNA (range), log10 copies/mL |
4.8 (2.7-6.8) |
4.8 (2.2-6.5) |
| Percentage of subjects with baseline viral load: |
| < 30,000 copies/mL |
27.5% |
28.8% |
| ≥30,000 copies/mL and < 100,000 copies/mL |
34.4% |
35.3% |
| ≥100,000 copies/mL |
38.1% |
35.9% |
| Median baseline CD4+ cell count (range), cells/mm³ |
99(1-789) |
109(0-912) |
| Percentage of subjects with baseline CD4+ cell count: |
|
|
| < 50 cells/mm³ |
35.6% |
34.7% |
| ≥50 cells/mm³ and < 200 cells/mm³ |
34.8% |
34.5% |
| ≥200 cells/mm³ |
29.6% |
30.8% |
| Median (range) number of primary PI substitutions* |
4 (0-7) |
4 (0-8) |
| Percentage of subjects with previous use of NNRTIs: |
| 0 |
8.2% |
7.9% |
| 1 |
46.9% |
46.7% |
| ≥1 |
44.9% |
45.4% |
| Percentage of subjects with previous use of the following NNRTIs: |
| Efavirenz |
70.3% |
72.5% |
| Nevirapine |
57.1% |
58.6% |
| Delavirdine |
13.7% |
12.6% |
| Median (range) number of NNRTI RASs† |
2(0-8) |
2(0-7) |
| Median fold change of the virus for the following NNRTIs: |
| Delavirdine |
27.3 |
26.1 |
| Efavirenz |
63.9 |
45.4 |
| Etravirine |
1.6 |
1.5 |
| Nevirapine |
74.3 |
74.0 |
| Percentage of subjects with previous use of a fusion inhibitor |
39.6% |
42.2% |
| Percentage of subjects with a Phenotypic Sensitivity Score (PSS) for the background therapy ‡of: |
| 0 |
17.0% |
16.2% |
| 1 |
36.5% |
38.7% |
| 2 |
26.9% |
27.8% |
| ≥ 3 |
19.7% |
17.3% |
RASs = Resistance-Associated Substitutions, BR=background regimen, FC = fold change in EC50
* IAS-USA primary PI substitutions [August/September 2007]: D30N, V32I, L33F, M46I/L, I47A/V, G48V, I50L/V, I54L/M, L76V, V82A/F/L/S/T, I84V, N88S, L90M
† Tibotec NNRTI RASs [June 2008]: A98G, V90I, L100I, K101E/H/P/Q, K103H/N/S/T, V106A/M/I, V108I, E138A/G/K/Q, V179D/E/F/G/I/T, Y181C/I/V, Y188C/H/L, V189I, G190A/C/E/Q/S, H221Y, P255H, F227C/L, M230I/L, P236L, K238N/T, Y318F
‡ The PSS was calculated for the background therapy (as determined on Day 7). Percentages are based on the number of subjects with available phenotype data. For fusion inhibitors (enfuvirtide), subjects were considered resistant if the drug was used in previous therapy up to baseline. INTELENCE is not included in this calculation. |
Efficacy at Week 48 for subjects in the INTELENCE and placebo arms for the pooled TMC125-C206 and TMC125-C216 study populations are shown in Table 14.
Table 14: Treatment Outcomes at Week 48 (Pooled Analysis TMC125-C206 and TMC125-C216)
|
INTELENCE + BR
N=599 |
Placebo + BR
N=604 |
| Virologic responders at Week 48 Viral Load < 50 HIV-1 RNA copies/mL |
359 (60%) |
232 (38%) |
| Virologic failures at Week 48 Viral Load ≥ 50 HIV-1 RNA copies/mL |
123 (21%) |
201 (33%) |
| Death |
11 (2%) |
19 (3%) |
| Discontinuations before Week 48: |
| due to virologic failures |
58 (10%) |
110 (18%) |
| due to adverse events |
31 (5%) |
14 (2%) |
| due to other reasons |
17 (3%) |
28 (5%) |
| BR=background regimen |
At Week 48, 70.8% of INTELENCE-treated subjects achieved HIV-1 RNA less than 400 copies/mL as compared to 46.4% of placebo-treated subjects. The mean decrease in plasma HIV-1 RNA from baseline to Week 48 was -2.23 log10 copies/mL for INTELENCE-treated subjects and -1.46 log10 copies/mL for placebo-treated subjects. The mean CD4+ cell count increase from baseline for INTELENCE-treated subjects was 96 cells/mm³ and 68 cells/mm³ for placebo-treated subjects.
Of the study population who either re-used or did not use ENF, 57.4% of INTELENCE-treated subjects and 31.7% of placebo-treated subjects achieved HIV-1 RNA less than 50 copies/mL. Of the study population using ENF de novo, 67.3% of INTELENCE-treated subjects and 57.2% of placebo-treated subjects achieved HIV-1 RNA less than 50 copies/mL.
Treatment-emergent CDC category C events occurred in 4% of INTELENCE-treated subjects and 8.4% of placebo-treated subjects.
Study TMC125-C227 was a randomized, exploratory, active-controlled, open-label, Phase 2b trial. Eligible subjects were treatment-experienced, PI-naïve HIV-1-infected subjects with genotypic evidence of NNRTI resistance at screening or from prior genotypic analysis. The virologic response was evaluated in 116 subjects who were randomized to INTELENCE (59 subjects) or an investigator-selected PI (57 subjects), each given with 2 investigator-selected N(t)RTIs. INTELENCE-treated subjects had lower antiviral responses associated with reduced susceptibility to the N(t)RTIs and to INTELENCE as compared to the control PI-treated subjects.
Treatment-Experienced Pediatric Subjects (2 Years To Less Than 18 Years Of Age)
The efficacy of INTELENCE for treatment-experienced pediatric subjects is based on two Phase 2 trials, TMC125-C213 and TMC125-C234/IMPAACT P1090.
Pediatric Subjects (6 Years To Less Than 18 Years Of Age [TMC125-C213])
TMC125-C213, a single-arm, Phase 2 trial evaluating the pharmacokinetics, safety, tolerability, and efficacy of INTELENCE enrolled 101 antiretroviral treatment-experienced HIV-1 infected pediatric subjects 6 years to less than 18 years of age and weighing at least 16 kg. Subjects eligible for this trial were on an antiretroviral regimen with confirmed plasma HIV-1 RNA of at least 500 copies/mL and viral susceptibility to INTELENCE at screening.
The median baseline plasma HIV-1 RNA was 3.9 log10 copies/mL, and the median baseline CD4+ cell count was 385 x 106 cells/mm³.
At Week 24, 52% of subjects had HIV-1 RNA less than 50 copies per mL. The proportion of subjects with HIV-1 RNA less than 400 copies/mL was 67%. The mean CD4+ cell count increase from baseline was 112 x 106 cells/mm³.
Pediatric Subjects (2 Years To Less Than 6 Years Of Age [TMC125-C234/IMPAACT P1090])
TMC125-C234/IMPAACT P1090 is a Phase ½ trial evaluating the pharmacokinetics, safety, tolerability, and efficacy of INTELENCE in 20 antiretroviral treatment-experienced HIV-1 infected pediatric subjects 2 years to less than 6 years of age. The study enrolled subjects who had virologic failure on an antiretroviral treatment regimen after at least 8 weeks of treatment, or who had interrupted treatment for at least 4 weeks. Enrolled subjects had a history of virologic failure while on an antiretroviral regimen, with a confirmed HIV-1 RNA plasma viral load greater than 1,000 copies/mL and with no evidence of phenotypic resistance to etravirine at screening.
The median baseline plasma HIV-1 RNA was 4.4 log10 copies/mL, the median baseline CD4+ cell count was 817.5 x 106 cells/mm³, and the median baseline CD4+ percentage was 28%.
Virologic response, defined as achieving plasma viral load less than 400 HIV-1 RNA copies/mL, was evaluated.
Study treatment included etravirine plus an optimized background regimen of antiretroviral drugs. In addition to etravirine, all 20 subjects received a ritonavir-boosted protease inhibitor in combination with 1 or 2 NRTIs (n=14) and/or in combination with an integrase inhibitor (n=7).
At the time of the Week 24 analysis, seventeen subjects had completed at least 24 weeks of treatment or discontinued earlier. At Week 24, the proportion of subjects with less than 400 HIV-1 RNA copies/mL was 88% (15/17), and the proportion of subjects with less than 50 HIV-1 RNA copies/mL was 50% (7/14), for those with available data. The median change in plasma HIV-1 RNA from baseline to Week 24 was -2.14 log10 copies/mL. The median CD4+ cell count increase and the median CD4+ percentage increase from baseline was 298 x 106 cells/mm³ and 5%, respectively.