CLINICAL PHARMACOLOGY
Mechanism Of Action
HEMLIBRA bridges activated factor IX and factor X to
restore the function of missing activated factor VIII that is needed for
effective hemostasis.
Pharmacokinetics
Emicizumab-kxwh exhibited dose-proportional
pharmacokinetics over a dose range of 0.3 mg/kg (0.1 times approved recommended
starting dosage) to 6 mg/kg following subcutaneous administration. Following
multiple subcutaneous administrations of a loading dose of 3 mg/kg emicizumab-kxwh
once weekly for the first 4 weeks in hemophilia A patients, mean (± SD) trough
plasma concentrations of 52.6 ± 13.6 μg/mL was achieved at Week 5.
Sustained mean (± SD) plasma concentrations of emicizumab-kxwh at
steady-state with the recommended maintenance doses are shown in Table 4.
Table 4 : Mean (± SD)
Steady-State Concentrations after emicizumab-kxwh Loading Dose by Maintenance
Dose Regimen
|
Maintenance Dose |
Parameters |
1.5 mg/kg once every week |
3 mg/kg once every two weeks |
6 mg/kg once every four weeks |
Cmax, ss (μg/mL) |
55.1 ± 15.9 |
58.3 ± 16.4 |
67 ± 17.7 |
AUCss,τ (μg/mL*day) |
376 ±109 |
752 ±218 |
1503 ± 437 |
Ctrough, ss (μg/mL) |
51.2 ± 15.2 |
46.9 ± 14.8 |
38.5 ± 14.2 |
Cmax/ Ctrough ratio (μg/mL) |
1.08 ± 0.03 |
1.26 ±0.12 |
1.85 ± 0.47 |
AUCss,τ = area under the concentration time
curve at steady-state over the dosing interval (τ = 1, 2, or 4 weeks);
Cmax, ss = maximum plasma concentration at steady state; Ctrough, ss = trough
concentration at steady state. |
Absorption
Following subcutaneous administration, the mean (±
SD) absorption half-life was 1.6 ± 1 day.
The absolute bioavailability following subcutaneous
administration of 1 mg/kg was between 80.4% and 93.1%. Similar pharmacokinetic
profiles were observed following subcutaneous administration in the abdomen,
upper arm, and thigh [see DOSAGE AND ADMINISTRATION].
Distribution
The mean apparent volume of distribution (% coefficient
of variation [%CV]) was 10.4 L (26.0%).
Elimination
The mean apparent clearance (%CV) was 0.27 L/day (28.4%)
and the mean elimination apparent half-life (± SD) was 26.9 ± 9.1
days.
Specific Populations
The pharmacokinetics of emicizumab-kxwh are not
influenced by age (1 year to 77 years), race (White 62.7%, Asian 22.9%, and
Black 8%), inhibitor status (inhibitor present, 50%), mild hepatic impairment
(defined as total bilirubin 1x to ≤1.5x the upper limit of
normal (ULN) and any aspartate transaminase (AST) level), moderate hepatic
impairment (defined as total bilirubin 1.5x to ≤3x the ULN and
any AST level), mild renal impairment (defined as creatinine clearance (CrCl)
of 60 – 89 mL/min), and moderate renal impairment (defined as CrCl of 30 – 59
mL/min).
In pediatric patients less than 6 months old, the
predicted concentrations of emicizumab-kxwh were 19% to 33% lower than the
older patients, especially with the 3 mg/kg once every two weeks or 6 mg/kg
once every four weeks maintenance dose.
Body weight: The apparent clearance and volume of
distribution of emicizumab-kxwh increased with increasing body weight (9 kg to
156 kg). Dosing in mg/kg provides similar emicizumabkxwh exposure across body
weight range.
Drug Interaction Studies
No drug-drug interaction studies have been conducted with
HEMLIBRA.
Clinical Studies
Hemophilia A Without FVIII Inhibitors
The efficacy of HEMLIBRA for routine prophylaxis in
patients with hemophilia A without FVIII inhibitors was evaluated in two
clinical trials [adult and adolescent studies (HAVEN 3 and HAVEN 4)].
HAVEN 3 (Adult And Adolescent Patients)
The HAVEN 3 study (NCT02847637) was a randomized,
multicenter, open-label, clinical trial in 152 adult and adolescent males (aged
≥ 12 years and ≥ 40 kg) with hemophilia A without FVIII inhibitors
who previously received either episodic (on demand) or prophylactic treatment
with FVIII. Patients received HEMLIBRA prophylaxis, 3 mg/kg once weekly for the
first 4 weeks followed by either 1.5 mg/kg once every week [Arms A and D] or 3
mg/kg once every two weeks [Arm B] thereafter, or no prophylaxis (Arm C).
Patients in Arm C could switch to HEMLIBRA prophylaxis (3 mg/kg once every two
weeks) after completing at least 24 weeks without prophylaxis. For Arms A and
B, dose up-titration to 3 mg/kg once every week was allowed after 24 weeks on
HEMLIBRA prophylaxis for patients who experienced two or more qualified bleeds
(i.e., spontaneous and clinically significant bleeds occurring at steady
state). For Arm D patients, dose up-titration was allowed after the second
qualifying bleed. During the study, five patients underwent up-titration of
their maintenance dose; however, this study was not designed to investigate the
3 mg/kg once every week dosing regimen.
Eighty-nine patients previously treated with episodic (on
demand) FVIII were randomized in a 2:2:1 ratio to receive HEMLIBRA prophylaxis
1.5 mg/kg once every week (Arm A), 3 mg/kg once every two weeks (Arm B), or no
prophylaxis (Arm C), with stratification by prior 24-week bleed rate (< 9 or
≥ 9). Sixty-three patients previously treated with prophylactic FVIII
were enrolled into Arm D to receive HEMLIBRA prophylaxis (1.5 mg/kg once every
week). Efficacy was evaluated after a minimum of 24 weeks of follow-up based on
the bleed rate for bleeds requiring treatment with coagulation factors among
patients previously treated with episodic (on-demand) FVIII who were randomized
to HEMLIBRA prophylaxis 1.5 mg/kg once every week (Arm A) or 3 mg/kg once every
two weeks (Arm B) compared with those receiving no prophylaxis (Arm C). The
study also evaluated the randomized comparison of Arms A and C and Arms B and C
for the efficacy of HEMLIBRA prophylaxis in reducing the number of all bleeds,
spontaneous bleeds, joint bleeds, and target joint bleeds.
The efficacy of HEMLIBRA prophylaxis compared with
previous prophylactic FVIII was also evaluated in patients who had participated
in a non-interventional study (NIS) prior to enrollment (Arm D). Only patients
from the NIS were included in this comparison, because bleed and treatment data
were collected with the same level of granularity as that used in HAVEN 3.
The efficacy results of HEMLIBRA prophylaxis (1.5 mg/kg
once every week and 3 mg/kg once every two weeks) compared with no prophylaxis
with respect to rate of treated bleeds, all bleeds, treated spontaneous bleeds,
treated joint bleeds, and treated target joint bleeds are shown in Table 5.
Table 5 : Annualized Bleed Rate with HEMLIBRA
Prophylaxis versus No Prophylaxis in Patients ≥ 12 Years of Age without
Factor VIII Inhibitors
Endpoint |
HEMLIBRA 1.5 mg/kg once every week
(N = 36) |
HEMLIBRA 3 mg/kg once every two weeks
(N = 35) |
No Prophylaxis
(N = 18) |
Treated Bleeds |
ABR (95% CI) a |
1.5 (0.9, 2.5) |
1.3 (0.8, 2.3) |
38.2 (22.9, 63.8) |
% reduction
(95% CI)
p-value |
96%
(92.5%, 98%)
< 0.0001 |
97%
(93.4%, 98.3%)
< 0.0001 |
- |
% patients with Q bleeds
(95% CI) |
55.6 (38.1, 72.1) |
60 (42.1, 76.1) |
0 (0, 18.5) |
Median ABR (IQR) |
0 (0, 2.5) |
0 (0, 1.9) |
40.4 (25.3, 56.7) |
All Bleeds |
ABR (95% CI) a |
2.5 (1.6, 3.9) |
2.6 (1.6, 4.3) |
47.6 (28.5, 79.6) |
% reduction
(95% CI)
p-value |
95%
(90.1%, 97%)
< 0.0001 |
94%
(89.7%, 97%)
< 0.0001 |
- |
% patients with Q bleeds (95% CI) |
50 (32.9, 67.1) |
40 (23.9, 57.9) |
0 (0, 18.5) |
Median ABR (IQR) |
0.6 (0, 3.9) |
1.6 (0, 4) |
46.9 (26.1, 73.9) |
Treated Spontaneous Bleeds |
ABR (95% CI) a |
1.0 (0.5, 1.9) |
0.3 (0.1, 0.8) |
15.6 (7.6, 31.9) |
% reduction
(95% CI)
p-value |
94%
(84.9%, 97.5%)
< 0.0001 |
98%
(94.4%, 99.4%)
< 0.0001 |
- |
% patients with Q bleeds (95% CI) |
66.7 (49.0, 81.4) |
88.6 (73.3, 96.8) |
22.2 (6.4, 47.6) |
Median ABR (IQR) |
0 (0, 1.3) |
0 (0, 0) |
10.8 (2.1, 26) |
Treated Joint Bleeds |
ABR (95% CI) a |
1.1 (0.6, 1.9) |
0.9 (0.4, 1.7) |
26.5 (14.7, 47.8) |
% reduction
(95% CI)
p-value |
96%
(91.5%, 98.1%)
< 0.0001 |
97%
(93%, 98.5%)
< 0.0001 |
- |
% patients with Q bleeds (95% CI) |
58.3 (40.8, 74.5) |
74.3 (56.7, 87.5) |
0 (0, 18.5) |
Median ABR (IQR) |
0 (0, 1.9) |
0 (0, 1.3) |
21.3 (14.5, 41.3) |
Treated Target Joint Bleeds |
ABR (95% CI) a |
0.6 (0.3, 1.4) |
0.7 (0.3, 1.6) |
13 (5.2, 32.3) |
% reduction
(95% CI)
p-value |
95%
(85.7%, 98.4%)
< 0.0001 |
95%
(85.3%, 98.2%)
< 0.0001 |
- |
% patients with Q bleeds (95% CI) |
69.4
(51.9, 83.7) |
77.1
(59.9, 89.6) |
27.8
(9.7, 53.5) |
Median ABR (IQR) |
0 (0, 1.4) |
0 (0, 0) |
12.8 (0, 39.1) |
ABR = annualized bleed rate; CI = confidence interval;
IQR = interquartile range, 25th percentile to 75th percentile.
a Based on negative binomial regression model. |
In the HAVEN 3 intra-patient analysis, HEMLIBRA
prophylaxis resulted in a statistically significant (p < 0.0001)
reduction (68%) in bleed rate for treated bleeds compared with previous FVIII
prophylaxis collected in the NIS prior to enrollment (see Table 6).
Table 6 : Intra-Patient Comparison of Annualized Bleed
Rate with HEMLIBRA Prophylaxis versus Previous FVIII Prophylaxis
Endpoint |
HEMLIBRA 1.5 mg/kg once every week
(N = 48) |
Previous FVIII Prophylaxis
(N = 48) |
Median Observation Period (weeks) |
33.7 |
30.1 |
Treated Bleeds |
ABR (95% CI) a |
1.5 (1, 2.3) |
4.8 (3.2, 7.1) |
% reduction (95% CI) p-value |
68% (48.6%, 80.5%)
< 0.0001 |
% patients with Q bleeds (95% CI) |
54.2 (39.2, 68.6) |
39.6 (25.8, 54.7) |
Median ABR (IQR) |
0 (0, 2.1) |
1.8 (0, 7.6) |
ABR = annualized bleed rate; CI = confidence interval;
IQR = interquartile range, 25th percentile to 75th percentile.
a Based on negative binomial regression model. |
HAVEN 4 (Adult And Adolescent Patients)
The HAVEN 4 study (NCT03020160) was a single-arm,
multicenter, open-label, clinical trial in 41 adult and adolescent males (aged
≥ 12 years and ≥ 40 kg) with hemophilia A with or without FVIII
inhibitors who previously received either episodic (on demand) or prophylactic
treatment with FVIII or bypassing agents. Patients received HEMLIBRA prophylaxis
at 3 mg/kg once weekly for the first 4 weeks followed by 6 mg/kg once every
four weeks thereafter.
Efficacy was evaluated in a subgroup of 36 patients with
hemophilia A without FVIII inhibitors based on the bleed rate for bleeds
requiring treatment with coagulation factors. The study also evaluated the
efficacy of HEMLIBRA prophylaxis on all bleeds, treated spontaneous bleeds, treated
joint bleeds, and treated target joint bleeds.
The efficacy results of HEMLIBRA prophylaxis 6 mg/kg once
every four weeks with respect to rate of treated bleeds, all bleeds, treated
spontaneous bleeds, treated joint bleeds, and treated target joint bleeds are
shown in Table 7. The median observation time was 25.6 weeks (range 24.1 – 29.4
weeks).
Table 7 : Annualized Bleed Rate with HEMLIBRA
Prophylaxis 6 mg/kg Once Every Four Weeks in Patients ≥ 12 Years of Age
without Factor VIII Inhibitors
Endpoint |
ABRa (95% CI)
N = 36 |
Median ABR (IQR)
N = 36 |
% Zero Bleeds (95% CI)
N = 36 |
Treated Bleeds |
2.6 (1.5, 4.7) |
0 (0, 2.1) |
52.8 (35.5, 69.6) |
All Bleeds |
4.8 (3.2, 7.1) |
2.1 (0, 6.1) |
27.8 (14.2, 45.2) |
Treated Spontaneous Bleeds |
0.6 (0.2, 1.6) |
0 (0, 0) |
83.3 (67.2, 93.6) |
Treated Joint Bleeds |
1.8 (0.8, 4) |
0 (0, 1.9) |
69.4 (51.9, 83.7) |
Treated Target Joint Bleeds |
1.1 (0.4, 3.7) |
0 (0,0) |
83.3 (67.2, 93.6) |
ABR = annualized bleed rate; CI = confidence interval;
IQR = interquartile range, 25th percentile to 75th percentile.
a Based on negative binomial regression model. |
Hemophilia A With FVIII Inhibitors
The efficacy of HEMLIBRA for routine prophylaxis in
patients with hemophilia A with FVIII inhibitors was evaluated in three
clinical trials [adult and adolescent studies (HAVEN 1 and HAVEN 4) and a
pediatric study (HAVEN 2)].
HAVEN 1 (Adult And Adolescent Patients)
The HAVEN 1 study (NCT02622321) was a randomized,
multicenter, open-label, clinical trial in 109 adult and adolescent males (aged
≥ 12 years and ≥ 40 kg) with hemophilia A with FVIII inhibitors who
previously received either episodic (on-demand) or prophylactic treatment with bypassing
agents. Patients received HEMLIBRA prophylaxis (Arms A, C, and D), 3 mg/kg once
weekly for the first 4 weeks followed by 1.5 mg/kg once every week thereafter,
or no prophylaxis (Arm B). Patients in Arm B could switch to HEMLIBRA
prophylaxis after completing at least 24 weeks without prophylaxis. Dose
up-titration to 3 mg/kg once every week was allowed after 24 weeks on HEMLIBRA
prophylaxis for patients who experienced two or more qualified bleeds (i.e.,
spontaneous and clinically significant bleeds occurring at steady state).
During the study, two patients underwent up-titration of their maintenance
dose; however, this study was not designed to investigate the 3 mg/kg once
every week dosing regimen.
Fifty-three patients previously treated with episodic
(on-demand) bypassing agents were randomized in a 2:1 ratio to receive HEMLIBRA
prophylaxis (Arm A) or no prophylaxis (Arm B), with stratification by prior
24-week bleed rate (< 9 or ≥ 9). Forty-nine patients previously
treated with prophylactic bypassing agents were enrolled into Arm C to receive HEMLIBRA
prophylaxis. Seven patients previously treated with episodic (on-demand) bypassing
agents who had participated in the NIS prior to enrollment, but were unable to
enroll into HAVEN 1 prior to the closure of Arms A and B, were enrolled into
Arm D to receive HEMLIBRA prophylaxis.
Efficacy was evaluated after a minimum of 24 weeks of
follow-up based on the bleed rate for bleeds requiring treatment with
coagulation factors among patients previously treated with episodic bypassing
agents who were randomized to HEMLIBRA prophylaxis (Arm A) compared with those
receiving no prophylaxis (Arm B). The study also evaluated the randomized comparison
of Arms A and B for the efficacy of HEMLIBRA prophylaxis in reducing the number
of all bleeds, spontaneous bleeds, joint bleeds, and target joint bleeds, as
well as patientreported symptoms and physical functioning.
The efficacy of HEMLIBRA prophylaxis compared with
previous prophylactic bypassing agents was also evaluated in patients who had
participated in the NIS prior to enrollment (Arm C). Only patients from the NIS
were included in this comparison, because bleed and treatment data were collected
with the same level of granularity as that used in HAVEN 1.
The efficacy results of HEMLIBRA prophylaxis 1.5 mg/kg
once every week compared with no prophylaxis with respect to rate of treated
bleeds, all bleeds, treated spontaneous bleeds, treated joint bleeds, and
treated target joint bleeds are shown in Table 8.
Table 8 : Annualized Bleed Rate with HEMLIBRA
Prophylaxis versus No Prophylaxis in Patients ≥ 12 Years of Age with
Factor VIII Inhibitors
Endpoint |
HEMLIBRA 1.5 mg/kg once every week
(N = 35) |
No Prophylaxis
(N = 18) |
Treated Bleeds |
ABR (95% CI) a |
2.9 (1.7, 5.0) |
23.3 (12.3, 43.9) |
% reduction (95% CI) |
87% (72.3%, 94.3%) |
p-value |
< 0.0001 |
% patients with 0 bleeds (95% CI) |
62.9 (44.9, 78.5) |
5.6 (0.1, 27.3) |
Median ABR (IQR) |
0 (0, 3.7) |
18.8 (13.0, 35.1) |
All Bleeds |
ABR (95% CI) a |
5.5 (3.6, 8.6) |
28.3 (16.8, 47.8) |
% reduction (95% CI) |
80% (62.5%, 89.8%) |
p-value |
< 0.0001 |
% patients with 0 bleeds (95% CI) |
37.1 (21.5, 55.1) |
5.6 (0.1, 27.3) |
Median ABR (IQR) |
2 (0, 9.9) |
30.2 (18.3, 39.4) |
Treated Spontaneous Bleeds |
ABR (95% CI) a |
1.3 (0.7, 2.2) |
16.8 (9.9, 28.3) |
% reduction (95% CI) |
92% (84.6%, 96.3%) |
p-value |
< 0.0001 |
% patients with 0 bleeds (95% CI) |
68.6 (50.7, 83.1) |
11.1 (1.4, 34.7) |
Median ABR (IQR) |
0 (0, 3.3) |
15.2 (6.6, 30.4) |
Treated Joint Bleeds |
ABR (95% CI) a |
0.8 (0.3, 2.2) |
6.7 (2.0, 22.4) |
% reduction (95% CI) |
89% (48%, 97.5%) |
p-value |
0.0050 |
% patients with 0 bleeds (95% CI) |
85.7 (69.7, 95.2) |
50.0 (26.0, 74.0) |
Median ABR (IQR) |
0 (0, 0) |
1 (0, 14.4) |
Treated Target Joint Bleeds |
ABR (95% CI) a |
0.1 (0.03, 0.6) |
3.0 (1.0, 9.1) |
% reduction (95% CI) |
95% (77.3%, 99.1%) |
p-value |
0.0002 |
% patients with 0 bleeds (95% CI) |
94.3 (80.8, 99.3) |
50.0 (26.0, 74.0) |
Median ABR (IQR) |
0 (0, 0) |
1 (0, 6.5) |
ABR = annualized bleed rate; CI = confidence interval;
IQR = interquartile range, 25th percentile to 75th percentile.
a Based on negative binomial regression model. |
Descriptive analyses were conducted to assess HEMLIBRA
prophylaxis once every week using 12-week treatment intervals up to Week 72.
The descriptive mean ABRs for treated bleeds are shown in Table 9.
Table 9 : Annualized Bleed Rate with HEMLIBRA
Prophylaxis Once Every Week per 12- Week Intervals in Patients ≥ 12 Years
of Age with Factor VIII Inhibitors
Endpoint |
Time Interval (Weeks) |
1 - 12
(N = 109) |
13 - 24
(N = 108) |
25 - 36
(N = 93) |
37 - 48
(N = 93) |
49 - 60
(N = 57) |
61 - 72
(N = 42) |
Treated Bleeds |
Mean ABR (95% CI) |
3.9 (1.1, 10.2) |
2.2 (0.3, 7.6) |
0.9 (0, 5.5) |
0.4 (0, 4.4) |
0.5 (0, 4.7) |
0.6 (0, 4.9) |
ABR = annualized bleed rate; CI = confidence interval
based on Poisson distribution; N = number of patients who contributed data for
analyses at each time interval. |
ABR = annualized bleed rate; CI = confidence interval
based on Poisson distribution; N = number of patients who contributed data for
analyses at each time interval.
In the HAVEN 1 intra-patient analysis, HEMLIBRA
prophylaxis resulted in a statistically significant (p = 0.0003)
reduction (79%) in bleed rate for treated bleeds compared with previous bypassing
agent prophylaxis collected in the NIS prior to enrollment (Table 10).
Table 10 : Intra-Patient Comparison of Annualized
Bleed Rate with HEMLIBRA Prophylaxis versus Previous Bypassing Agent
Prophylaxis
Endpoint |
HEMLIBRA 1.5 mg/kg once every week
(N = 24) |
Previous Bypassing Agent Prophylaxis
(N = 24) |
Median Observation Period (weeks) |
30.1 |
32.1 |
Treated Bleeds |
ABR (95% CI) a |
3.3 (1.3, 8.1) |
15.7 (11.1, 22.3) |
% reduction (95% CI) |
79% (51.4%, 91.1%) |
p-value |
0.0003 |
% patients with 0 bleeds (95% CI) |
70.8 (48.9, 87.4) |
12.5 (2.7, 32.4) |
Median ABR (IQR) |
0 (0, 2.2) |
12 (5.7, 24.2) |
ABR = annualized bleed rate; CI = confidence interval;
IQR = interquartile range, 25th percentile to 75th percentile.
a Based on negative binomial regression model. |
The HAVEN 1 study evaluated patient-reported
hemophilia-related symptoms (painful swellings and presence of joint pain) and
physical functioning (pain with movement and difficulty walking far) using the
Physical Health Score of the Haemophilia-specific Quality of Life (Haem-A-QoL) questionnaire
for patients ≥ 18 years of age. The HEMLIBRA prophylaxis arm (Arm A)
showed an improvement compared with the no prophylaxis arm (Arm B) in the
Haem-A-QoL Physical Health Subscale score at the Week 25 assessment (Table 11).
The improvement in the Physical Health Score was further supported by the Total
Score as measured by the Haem-A-QoL at Week 25.
Table 11 : Change in Haem-A-QoL Physical Health Score
with HEMLIBRA Prophylaxis versus No Prophylaxis in Patients (≥
18 Years of Age) with Factor VIII Inhibitors at Week 25
Haem-A-QoL Scores at Week 25 |
HEMLIBRA 1.5 mg/kg once every week
(N=25a) |
No Prophylaxis
(N=14a) |
Physical Health Score (range 0 to 100)b |
Adjusted mean c |
32.6 |
54.2 |
Difference in adjusted means (95% CI) |
21.6 (7.9, 35.2) |
p-value |
0.0029 |
a Number of patients ≥ 18 years who
completed the Haem-A-QoL questionnaire.
b Lower scores are reflective of better functioning.
c Adjusted for baseline, and baseline by treatment group interaction. |
HAVEN 2 (Pediatric Patients)
The HAVEN 2 study (NCT02795767) was a single-arm,
multicenter, open-label, clinical trial in pediatric males (age < 12
years, or 12 - 17 years who weigh < 40 kg) with hemophilia A with
FVIII inhibitors. Patients received HEMLIBRA prophylaxis at 3 mg/kg once weekly
for the first 4 weeks followed by 1.5 mg/kg once every week thereafter.
The study evaluated the efficacy of HEMLIBRA prophylaxis,
including the efficacy of HEMLIBRA prophylaxis compared with previous episodic
(on-demand) and prophylactic
bypassing agent treatment in patients who had
participated in a non-interventional study (NIS) prior to enrollment
(intra-patient analysis).
At the time of the interim analysis, efficacy was
evaluated in 59 pediatric patients who were < 12 years of age and had
been receiving HEMLIBRA prophylaxis for at least 12 weeks, including 38
patients age 6 to < 12 years, 17 patients age 2 to < 6 years, and
four patients age < 2 years.
Annualized bleed rate (ABR) and percent of patients with
zero bleeds were calculated for 59 patients (Table 12). The median observation
time for these patients was 29.6 weeks (range 18.4 – 63 weeks).
Table 12 : Annualized Bleed Rate with HEMLIBRA
Prophylaxis 1.5 mg/kg Once Every Week in Pediatric Patients < 12 Years of
Age with Factor VIII Inhibitors (Interim Analysis)
Endpoint |
ABRa (95% CI) N = 59 |
Median ABR (IQR) N = 59 |
% Zero Bleeds (95% CI) N = 59 |
Treated Bleeds |
0.3 (0.1, 0.5) |
0 (0, 0) |
86.4 (75, 94) |
All Bleeds |
3.8 (2.2, 6.5) |
0 (0, 3.4) |
55.9 (42.4, 68.8) |
Treated Spontaneous Bleeds |
0 (0, 0.2) |
0 (0, 0) |
98.3 (90.9, 100) |
Treated Joint Bleeds |
0.2 (0.1, 0.4) |
0 (0, 0) |
89.8 (79.2, 96.2) |
Treated Target Joint Bleeds |
0.1 (0, 0.7) |
0 (0, 0) |
96.6 (88.3, 99.6) |
ABR = annualized bleed rate; CI = confidence interval;
IQR = interquartile range, 25th percentile to 75th percentile.
a Based on negative binomial regression model. |
In the intra-patient analysis, 18 pediatric patients who
had participated in the NIS had an ABR for treated bleeds of 19.8 (95% CI
[15.3, 25.7]) on previous bypassing agent treatment (prophylactic treatment in
15 patients and on-demand treatment for 3 patients). HEMLIBRA prophylaxis resulted
in an ABR for treated bleeds of 0.4 (95% CI [0.2, 0.9]) based on negative binomial
regression, corresponding to a 98% reduction in bleed rate. On HEMLIBRA prophylaxis,
14 patients (77.8%) had zero treated bleeds.
The HAVEN 2 study evaluated patient-reported
hemophilia-related symptoms (painful swellings and presence of joint pain) and
physical functioning (pain with movement) using the Physical Health Score of
the Hemophilia-specific Quality of Life Short Form (Haemo-QoL-SF) questionnaire
for patients ≥ 8 to < 12 years of age. HEMLIBRA prophylaxis showed improvement
from baseline in the Haemo-QoL-SF Physical Health Subscale score at the Week 25
assessment.
HAVEN 4 (Adult And Adolescent Patients)
The HAVEN 4 study (NCT03020160) was a single-arm, multicenter,
open-label, clinical trial in 41 adult and adolescent males (aged ≥ 12
years and ≥ 40 kg) with hemophilia A with or without FVIII inhibitors who
previously received either episodic (on demand) or prophylactic treatment with
FVIII or bypassing agents. Patients received HEMLIBRA prophylaxis at 3 mg/kg
once weekly for the first 4 weeks followed by 6 mg/kg once every four weeks
thereafter.
Efficacy was evaluated in a subgroup of 5 patients with
hemophilia A with FVIII inhibitors based on the bleed rate for bleeds requiring
treatment with coagulation factors. The median observation time was 26.1 weeks
(range 24.4 – 28.6 weeks). HEMLIBRA prophylaxis resulted in an ABR (95% CI) for
treated bleeds of 1.2 (0.1, 14.8) based on negative binomial regression. On
HEMLIBRA prophylaxis, 4 patients had zero treated bleeds.
The efficacy results of HEMLIBRA prophylaxis (1.5 mg/kg
once every week, 3 mg/kg once every two weeks, and 6 mg/kg once every four
weeks) with respect to rate of treated bleeds are shown in Table 13.
Table 13 : Annualized Bleed Rate (Treated Bleeds) with
HEMLIBRA Prophylaxis in Patients with or without Factor VIII Inhibitors
Endpoint |
HAVEN 1 |
HAVEN 2 |
HAVEN 3 |
HAVEN 4 |
HEMLIBRA 1.5 mg/kg once every week
(N = 35) |
No Prophylaxis
(N = 18) |
HEMLIBRA 1.5 mg/kg once every week
(N = 59) |
HEMLIBRA 1.5 mg/kg once every week
(N = 36) |
HEMLIBRA 3 mg/kg once every two weeks
(N = 35) |
No Prophylaxis
(N = 18) |
HEMLIBRA 6 mg/kg once every four weeks
(N = 41) |
Median Efficacy Period (weeks) |
29.3 |
24 |
29.6 |
29.6 |
31.3 |
24 |
25.6 |
ABR (95% CI) a |
2.9 (1.7, 5) |
23.3 (12.3, 43.9) |
0.3 (0.1, 0.5) |
1.5 (0.9, 2.5) |
1.3 (0.8, 2.3) |
38.2 (22.9, 63.8) |
2.4 (1.4, 4.3) |
% reduction vs no prophylaxis (95% CI), p-value |
87%
(72.3%, 94.3%) < 0.0001 |
- |
- |
96%
(92.5%, 98%) < 0.0001 |
97%
(93.4%, 98.3%) < 0.0001 |
- |
- |
% patients with 0 bleeds (95% CI) |
62.9 (44.9, 78.5) |
5.6 (0.1, 27.3) |
86.4 (75, 94) |
55.6 (38.1, 72.1) |
60 (42.1, 76.1) |
0 (0, 18.5) |
56.1 (39.7, 71.5) |
% patients with 0 - 3 bleeds (95% CI) |
85.7 (69.7, 95.2) |
11.1 (1.4, 34.7) |
100 (93.9, 100) |
91.7 (77.5, 98.2) |
94.3 (80.8, 99.3) |
5.6 (0.1, 27.3) |
90.2 (76.9, 97.3) |
Median ABR (IQR) |
0 (0, 3.7) |
18.8 (13, 35.1) |
0 (0, 0) |
0 (0, 2.5) |
0 (0, 1.9) |
40.4 (25.3, 56.7) |
0 (0, 2.1) |
ABR = annualized bleed rate; CI = confidence interval;
IQR = interquartile range, 25th percentile to 75th percentile; HAVEN
1 = adult and adolescent patients with factor VIII inhibitors; HAVEN 2 =
pediatric patients with factor VIII inhibitors; HAVEN 3 = adult and adolescent
patients without factor VIII inhibitors; HAVEN 4 = adult and adolescent
patients with or without factor VIII inhibitors.
a Based on negative binomial regression model. |