Clinical Pharmacology for Genvoya
Mechanism Of Action
GENVOYA is a fixed-dose combination of antiretroviral drugs elvitegravir (plus the CYP3A inhibitor cobicistat), emtricitabine, and tenofovir alafenamide [see Microbiology].
Pharmacodynamics
Cardiac Electrophysiology
Thorough QT studies have been conducted for elvitegravir, cobicistat, and TAF. The effect of emtricitabine or the combination regimen GENVOYA on the QT interval is not known.
Elvitegravir
In a thorough QT/QTc study in 126 healthy subjects, elvitegravir (coadministered with 100 mg ritonavir) 125 mg and 250 mg (0.83 and 1.67 times the dose in GENVOYA) did not affect the QT/QTc interval and did not prolong the PR interval.
Cobicistat
In a thorough QT/QTc study in 48 healthy subjects, a single dose of cobicistat 250 mg and 400 mg (1.67 and 2.67 times the dose in GENVOYA) did not affect the QT/QTc interval. Prolongation of the PR interval was noted in subjects receiving cobicistat. The maximum mean (95% upper confidence bound) difference in PR from placebo after baseline-correction was 9.5 (12.1) msec for the 250 mg cobicistat dose and 20.2 (22.8) for the 400 mg cobicistat dose. Because the 150 mg cobicistat dose used in the GENVOYA fixed-dose combination tablet is lower than the lowest dose studied in the thorough QT study, it is unlikely that treatment with GENVOYA will result in clinically relevant PR prolongation.
Tenofovir Alafenamide (TAF)
In a thorough QT/QTc study in 48 healthy subjects, TAF at the therapeutic dose or at a supratherapeutic dose approximately 5 times the recommended therapeutic dose did not affect the QT/QTc interval and did not prolong the PR interval.
Effects On Serum Creatinine
The effect of cobicistat on serum creatinine was investigated in a Phase 1 study in subjects with an estimated creatinine clearance of at least 80 mL per minute (N=18) and with an estimated creatinine clearance of 50 to 79 mL per minute (N=12). A statistically significant change of estimated creatinine clearance from baseline was observed after 7 days of treatment with cobicistat 150 mg among subjects with an estimated creatinine clearance of at least 80 mL per minute (-9.9 ± 13.1 mL/min) and subjects with an estimated creatinine clearance between 50 and 79 mL per minute (-11.9 ± 7.0 mL per minute). These decreases in estimated creatinine clearance were reversible after cobicistat was discontinued. The actual glomerular filtration rate, as determined by the clearance of probe drug iohexol, was not altered from baseline following treatment of cobicistat among subjects with an estimated creatinine clearance of at least 50 mL per minute, indicating cobicistat inhibits tubular secretion of creatinine, reflected as a reduction in estimated creatinine clearance without affecting the actual glomerular filtration rate.
Pharmacokinetics
Absorption, Distribution, Metabolism, And Excretion
The pharmacokinetic (PK) properties of the components of GENVOYA are provided in Table 6. The multiple dose PK parameters of elvitegravir, cobicistat, emtricitabine, TAF and its metabolite tenofovir are provided in Table 7.
Table 6 : Pharmacokinetic Properties of the Components of GENVOYA
|
Elvitegravir |
Cobicistat |
Emtricitabine |
TAF |
| Absorption |
Tmax
(h) |
4 |
3 |
3 |
1 |
Effect of light meal
(relative to fasting): AUC Ratioa |
1.34
(1.19, 1.51) |
1.03
(0.90, 1.17) |
0.95
(0.91, 1.00) |
1.15
(1.07, 1.24) |
Effect of high fat meal
(relative to fasting): AUC Ratioa |
1.87
(1.66, 2.10) |
0.83
(0.73, 0.95) |
0.96
(0.92, 1.00) |
1.18
(1.09, 1.26) |
| Distribution |
| % Bound to human |
~99 |
~ 98 |
<4 |
~ 80 |
| plasma proteins |
| Source of protein binding data |
Ex vivo |
In vitro |
In vitro |
Ex vivo |
| Blood-to-plasma ratio |
0.73 |
0.5 |
0.6 |
1.0 |
| Elimination |
| Major route of elimination |
Metabolism |
Metabolism |
Glomerular filtration and active tubular secretion |
Metabolism
(>80% of oral dose) |
t½
(h)c |
12.9 |
3.5 |
10 |
0.51 |
| % Of dose excreted in urined |
6.7 |
8.2 |
70 |
<1% |
| % Of dose excreted in fecesd |
94.8 |
86.2 |
13.7 |
31.7 |
PBMCs = peripheral blood mononuclear cells; CES1 = carboxylesterase 1.
a Values refer to geometric mean ratio in AUC [fed / fasted] and
(90% confidence interval). Elvitegravir light meal=~373 kcal, 20% fat; GENVOYA light meal=~400 kcal, 20% fat; elvitegravir and GENVOYA high fat meal=~800 kcal, 50% fat. Based on the effect of food on elvitegravir, GENVOYA should be taken with food.
b In vivo, TAF is hydrolyzed within cells to form tenofovir
(major metabolite), which is phosphorylated to the active metabolite, tenofovir diphosphate. In vitro studies have shown that TAF is metabolized to tenofovir by cathepsin A in PBMCs and macrophages; and by CES1 in hepatocytes. Upon coadministration with the moderate CYP3A inducer probe efavirenz, TAF exposure was not significantly affected.
c t½ values refer to median terminal plasma half-life. Note that the pharmacologically active metabolite, tenofovir diphosphate, has a half-life of 150–180 hours within PBMCs.
d Dosing in mass balance studies: elvitegravir
(single dose administration of [14C] elvitegravir coadministered with 100 mg ritonavir); cobicistat
(single dose administration of [14C] cobicistat after multiple dosing of cobicistat for six days); emtricitabine (single dose administration of [14C] emtricitabine after multiple dosing of emtricitabine for ten days); TAF
(single dose administration of [14C] TAF). |
Table 7 : Multiple Dose Pharmacokinetic Parameters of Elvitegravir, Cobicistat, Emtricitabine, Tenofovir Alafenamide (TAF) and its Metabolite Tenofovir Following Oral Administration of GENVOYA with Food in HIV-Infected Adults
| Parameter Mean (CV%) |
Elvitegravira |
Cobicistata |
Emtricitabinea |
TAFb |
Tenofovirc |
| Cmax (microgram per mL) |
2.1 (33.7) |
1.5 (28.4) |
2.1 (20.2) |
0.16 (51.1) |
0.02 (26.1) |
| AUCtau (microgram•hour per mL) |
22.8 (34.7) |
9.5 (33.9) |
11.7 (16.6) |
0.21 (71.8) |
0.29 (27.4) |
| Ctrough (microgram per mL) |
0.29 (61.7) |
0.02 (85.2) |
0.10 (46.7) |
NA |
0.01 (28.5) |
CV = Coefficient of Variation; NA = Not Applicable
a From Intensive PK analysis in a Phase 2 trial in HIV infected adults, Study 102 (N=19).
b From Population PK analysis in two trials of treatment-naive adults with HIV-1 infection, Studies 104 and 111 (N=539).
c From Population PK analysis in two trials of treatment-naive adults with HIV-1 infection, Studies 104 and 111 (N=841). |
Special Populations
Geriatric Patients
Pharmacokinetics of elvitegravir, cobicistat, emtricitabine and tenofovir have not been fully evaluated in the elderly (65 years of age and older). Age does not have a clinically relevant effect on exposures of TAF up to 75 years of age [see Use In Specific Populations].
Pediatric Patients
Mean exposures of elvitegravir, cobicistat, and TAF achieved in 24 pediatric subjects aged 12 to less than 18 years who received GENVOYA in Study 106 were decreased compared to exposures achieved in treatment-naive adults following administration of GENVOYA, but were overall deemed acceptable based on exposure-response relationships; emtricitabine exposure in adolescents was similar to that in treatment-naive adults (Table 8).
Table 8 : Multiple Dose Pharmacokinetic Parameters of Elvitegravir, Cobicistat, Emtricitabine, Tenofovir Alafenamide (TAF) and its Metabolite Tenofovir Following Oral Administration of GENVOYA in HIV-Infected Pediatric Subjects Aged 12 to less than 18 Yearsa
| Parameter Mean (CV%) |
Elvitegravir |
Cobicistat |
Emtricitabine |
TAF |
Tenofovir |
| Cmax |
2.2 |
1.2 |
2.3 |
0.17 |
0.02 |
| (microgram per mL) |
(19.2) |
(35.0) |
(22.5) |
(64.4) |
(23.7) |
| AUCtau |
23.8 |
8.2b |
14.4 |
0.20b |
0.29b |
| (microgram•hour per mL) |
(25.5) |
(36.1) |
(23.9) |
(50.0) |
(18.8) |
| Ctrough |
0.30 |
0.03c |
0.10b |
NA |
0.01 |
| (microgram per mL) |
(81.0) |
(180.0) |
(38.9) |
(21.4) |
CV = Coefficient of Variation; NA = Not Applicable
a From Intensive PK analysis in a trial in treatment-naive pediatric subjects with HIV-1 infection, cohort 1 of Study 106 (N=24).
b N=23
c N=15 |
Exposures of the components of GENVOYA achieved in 23 pediatric subjects between the ages of 6 to less than 12 years who received GENVOYA in Study 106 were higher (20 to 80% for AUC) than exposures achieved in adults following the administration of GENVOYA; however, the increase was not considered clinically significant (Table 9) [see Use In Specific Populations].
Table 9 : Multiple Dose Pharmacokinetic Parameters of Elvitegravir, Cobicistat, Emtricitabine, Tenofovir Alafenamide (TAF) and its Metabolite Tenofovir Following Oral Administration of GENVOYA in HIV-Infected Pediatric Subjects Aged 6 to less than 12 Yearsa
| Parameter Mean (CV%) |
Elvitegravir |
Cobicistat |
Emtricitabine |
TAF |
Tenofovir |
| Cmax |
3.1 |
2.1 |
3.4 |
0.31 |
0.03 |
| (microgram per mL) |
(38.7) |
(46.7) |
(27.0) |
(61.2) |
(20.8) |
| AUCtau (microgram•hour per mL) |
33.8b (57.8) |
15.9c (51.7) |
20.6b (18.9) |
0.33 (44.8) |
0.44 (20.9) |
| Ctrough |
0.37 |
0.1 |
0.11 |
NA |
0.02 |
| (microgram per mL) |
(118.5) |
(168.7) |
(24.1) |
(24.9) |
CV = Coefficient of Variation; NA = Not Applicable
a From Intensive PK analysis in a trial in virologically-suppressed pediatric subjects with HIV-1 infection, cohort 2 of Study 106 (N=23).
b N=22
c N=20 |
Race, Gender
No clinically significant differences in pharmacokinetics of GENVOYA have been identified based on race or gender.
Patients With Renal Impairment
The pharmacokinetics of GENVOYA in HIV-1 infected subjects with mild or moderate renal impairment (estimated creatinine clearance between 30 and 69 mL per minute by Cockcroft-Gault method), and in HIV-1 infected subjects with ESRD (estimated creatinine clearance of less than 15 mL per minute by Cockcroft-Gault method) receiving chronic hemodialysis were evaluated in subsets of virologically suppressed subjects in respective open-label trials, Study 112 and Study 1825. The pharmacokinetics of elvitegravir, cobicistat, and tenofovir alafenamide were similar among healthy subjects, subjects with mild or moderate renal impairment, and subjects with ESRD receiving chronic hemodialysis; increases in emtricitabine and tenofovir exposures in subjects with renal impairment were not considered clinically relevant (Table 10).
Table 10 : Pharmacokinetics of GENVOYA in HIV-Infected Adults with Renal Impairment as Compared to Subjects with Normal Renal Function
| Estimated Creatinine Clearancea |
AUCtau (microgram•hour per mL) Mean (CV%) |
≥90 mL per minute
(N=18)b |
60-89 mL per minute
(N=11)c |
30-59 mL per minute
(N=18)d |
<15 mL per minute
(N=12)e |
| Emtricitabine |
11.4 (11.9) |
17.6 (18.2) |
23.0 (23.6) |
62.9 (48.0)f |
| Tenofovir |
0.32 (14.9) |
0.46 (31.5) |
0.61 (28.4) |
8.72 (39.4)g |
a By Cockcroft-Gault method.
b From a Phase 2 study in HIV-infected adults with normal renal function.
c These subjects from Study 112 had an estimated creatinine clearance between 60 and 69 mL per minute.
d Study 112.
e Study 1825; PK assessed prior to hemodialysis following 3 consecutive daily doses of GENVOYA.
f N=11.
g N=10. |
Patients With Hepatic Impairment
Elvitegravir And Cobicistat
A study of the pharmacokinetics of elvitegravir (administered with the CYP3A inhibitor cobicistat) was performed in healthy subjects and subjects with moderate hepatic impairment (Child-Pugh Class B). No clinically relevant differences in elvitegravir or cobicistat pharmacokinetics were observed between subjects with moderate hepatic impairment and healthy subjects [see Use In Specific Populations].
Emtricitabine
The pharmacokinetics of emtricitabine has not been studied in subjects with hepatic impairment; however, emtricitabine is not significantly metabolized by liver enzymes, so the impact of liver impairment should be limited.
Tenofovir Alafenamide (TAF)
Clinically relevant changes in TAF and tenofovir pharmacokinetics were not observed in subjects with mild to moderate (Child-Pugh Class A and B) hepatic impairment [see Use In Specific Populations].
Hepatitis B And/Or Hepatitis C Virus Co-infection
Elvitegravir: Limited data from population pharmacokinetic analysis (N=24) indicated that hepatitis B and/or C virus infection had no clinically relevant effect on the exposure of elvitegravir (administered with the CYP3A inhibitor cobicistat).
Cobicistat: There were insufficient pharmacokinetic data in the clinical trials to determine the effect of hepatitis B and/or C virus infection on the pharmacokinetics of cobicistat.
Emtricitabine and Tenofovir Alafenamide (TAF): Pharmacokinetics of emtricitabine and TAF have not been fully evaluated in subjects coinfected with hepatitis B and/or C virus.
Drug Interaction Studies
[see also CONTRAINDICATIONS and DRUG INTERACTIONS]
The drug-drug interaction studies described in Tables 11–14 were conducted with GENVOYA, elvitegravir (coadministered with cobicistat or ritonavir), cobicistat administered alone, or TAF (administered alone or coadministered with emtricitabine).
As GENVOYA should not be administered with other antiretroviral medications, information regarding drug-drug interactions with other antiretrovirals agents is not provided.
The effects of coadministered drugs on the exposure of elvitegravir, emtricitabine, and TAF are shown in Table 11, Table 12, and Table 13 respectively. The effects of GENVOYA or its components on the exposure of coadministered drugs are shown in Table 14. For information regarding clinical recommendations, see DRUG INTERACTIONS.
Table 11 : Drug Interactions: Changes in Pharmacokinetic Parameters forElvitegravir in the Presence of the Coadministered Druga
| Coadministered Drug |
Dose of Coadministered Drug (mg) |
Elvitegravir Dose (mg) |
CYP3A Inhibitor Cobicistat or Ritonavir Dose (mg) |
N |
Mean Ratio of Elvitegravir Pharmacokinetic Parameters (90% CI); No effect = 1.00 |
| Cmax |
AUC |
Cmin |
|
20 mL single dose given 4 hours before elvitegravir |
|
|
8 |
0.95 (0.84,1.07) |
0.96 (0.88,1.04) |
1.04 (0.93,1.17) |
| Maximum |
20 mL single dose given 4 hours after elvitegravir |
50 single |
Ritonavir 100 single dose |
10 |
0.98 (0.88,1.10) |
0.98 (0.91,1.06) |
1.00 (0.90,1.11) |
| strength antacidb |
20 mL single dose given 2 hours before elvitegravir |
dose |
11 |
0.82 (0.74,0.91) |
0.85 (0.79,0.91) |
0.90 (0.82,0.99) |
|
20 mL single dose given 2 hours after elvitegravir |
|
|
10 |
0.79 (0.71,0.88) |
0.80 (0.75,0.86) |
0.80 (0.73,0.89) |
| Atorvastatin |
10 single dose |
150 once dailyc |
Cobicistat 150 once dailyc |
16 |
0.91 (0.85,0.98) |
0.92 (0.87,0.98) |
0.88 (0.81,0.96) |
| Carbamazepine |
200 twice daily |
150 once daily |
Cobicistat 150 once daily |
12 |
0.55 (0.49,0.61) |
0.31 (0.28,0.33) |
0.03 (0.02,0.40) |
|
40 once daily given 12 hours after elvitegravir |
150 once daily |
Cobicistat 150 once daily |
10 |
1.02 (0.89,1.17) |
1.03 (0.95,1.13) |
1.18 (1.05,1.32) |
| Famotidine |
40 once daily given simultaneously with elvitegravir |
16 |
1.00 (0.92,1.10) |
1.03 (0.98,1.08) |
1.07 (0.98,1.17) |
| Ketoconazole |
200 twice daily |
150 once daily |
Ritonavir 100 once daily |
18 |
1.17 (1.04,1.33) |
1.48 (1.36,1.62) |
1.67 (1.48,1.88) |
| Ledipasvir/ Sofosbuvir |
90/400 once daily |
150 once dailyc |
Cobicistat 150 once dailyc |
30 |
0.98 (0.90,1.07) |
1.11 (1.02,1.20) |
1.46 (1.28,1.66) |
| Omeprazole |
40 once daily given 2 hours before elvitegravir |
50 once daily |
Ritonavir 100 once daily |
9 |
0.93 (0.83,1.04) |
0.99 (0.91,1.07) |
0.94 (0.85,1.04) |
| 20 once daily given 2 hours before elvitegravir |
150 once daily |
Cobicistat 150 once daily |
11 |
1.16 (1.04,1.30) |
1.10 (1.02,1.19) |
1.13 (0.96,1.34) |
| 20 once daily given 12 hours after elvitegravir |
11 |
1.03 (0.92,1.15) |
1.05 (0.93,1.18) |
1.10 (0.92,1.32) |
| Rifabutin |
150 once every other day |
150 once daily |
Cobicistat 150 once daily |
12 |
0.91 (0.84,0.99) |
0.79 (0.74,0.85) |
0.33 (0.27,0.40) |
| Rosuvastatin |
10 single dose |
150 once daily |
Cobicistat 150 once daily |
10 |
0.94 (0.83,1.07) |
1.02 (0.91,1.14) |
0.98 (0.83,1.16) |
| Sertraline |
50 single dose |
150 once dailyc |
Cobicistat 150 once dailyc |
19 |
0.88 (0.82,0.93) |
0.94 (0.89,0.98) |
0.99 (0.93,1.05) |
| Sofosbuvir/ Velpatasvir |
400/100 once daily |
150 once dailyc |
Cobicistat 150 once dailyc |
24 |
0.87 (0.80,0.94) |
0.94 (0.88,1.00) |
1.08 (0.97,1.20) |
| Sofosbuvir/ Velpatasvir/ Voxilaprevir |
400/100/100 + 100 Voxilaprevird once daily |
150 once dailyc |
Cobicistat 150 once dailyc |
29 |
0.79 (0.75,0.85) |
0.94 (0.88,1.00) |
1.32 (1.17,1.49) |
a All interaction studies conducted in healthy volunteers.
b Maximum strength antacid contained 80 mg aluminum hydroxide, 80 mg magnesium hydroxide, and 8 mg simethicone, per mL.
c Study conducted with GENVOYA.
d Study conducted with additional voxilaprevir 100 mg to achieve voxilaprevir exposures expected in HCV-infected patients. |
Table 12 : Drug Interactions: Changes in Pharmacokinetic Parameters for Emtricitabine in the Presence of the Coadministered Druga
| Coadministered Drug |
Dose of Coadministered Drug (mg) |
Emtricitabine Dose (mg) |
N |
Mean Ratio of Emtricitabine Pharmacokinetic Parameters (90% CI); No effect = 1.00 |
| Cmax |
AUC |
Cmin |
| Famciclovir |
500 single dose |
200 single dose |
12 |
0.90 (0.80,1.01) |
0.93 (0.87,0.99) |
NC |
| aAll interaction studies conducted in healthy volunteers. |
Table 13 : Drug Interactions: Changes in Pharmacokinetic Parameters for Tenofovir Alafenamide (TAF) in the Presence of the Coadministered Druga
| Coadministered Drug |
Dose of Coadministered Drug (mg) |
TAF Dose (mg) |
N |
Mean Ratio of TAF Pharmacokinetic Parameters (90% CI); No effect = 1.00 |
| Cmax |
AUC |
Cmin |
| Cobicistat |
150 once daily |
8 once daily |
12 |
2.83 (2.20,3.65) |
2.65 (2.29,3.07) |
NC |
| Ledipasvir/ Sofosbuvir |
90/400 once daily |
10 once dailyb |
30 |
0.90 (0.73,1.11) |
0.86 (0.78,0.95) |
NC |
| Sertraline |
50 single dose |
10 once dailyb |
19 |
1.00 (0.86,1.16) |
0.96 (0.89,1.03) |
NC |
| Sofosbuvir/ Velpatasvir |
400/100 once daily |
10 once dailyb |
24 |
0.80 (0.68,0.94) |
0.87 (0.81,0.94) |
NC |
| Sofosbuvir/ Velpatasvir/ Voxilaprevir |
400/100/100 + 100 Voxilaprevirconce daily |
10 once dailyb |
29 |
0.79 (0.68,0.92) |
0.93 (0.85,1.01) |
NC |
NC = Not Calculated
a All interaction studies conducted in healthy volunteers.
b Study conducted with GENVOYA.
c Study conducted with additional voxilaprevir 100 mg to achieve voxilaprevir exposures expected in HCV-infected patients. |
Table 14 : Drug Interactions: Changes in Pharmacokinetic Parameters for Coadministered Drug in the Presence of GENVOYA or the Individual Componentsa
| Coadministered Drug |
Dose of Coadministered Drug (mg) |
Elvitegravir Dose (mg) |
CYP3A Inhibitor Cobicistat Dose (mg) |
FTC Dose (mg) |
TAF Dose (mg) |
N |
Mean Ratio of Coadministered Drug Pharmacokinetic Parameters (90% CI); No effect = 1.00 |
| Cmax |
AUC |
Cmin |
| Atorvastatin |
10 single dose |
150 once dailyc |
150 once dailyc |
200 once dailyc |
10 once dailyc |
16 |
2.32 (1.91,2.82) |
2.60 (2.31,2.93) |
nc |
| Buprenorphine |
16 - 24 once |
150 once |
150 once |
N/A |
N/A |
17 |
1.12 (0.98,1.27) |
1.35 (1.18,1.55) |
1.66 (1.43,1.93) |
| Norbuprenorphine |
daily |
daily |
daily |
|
|
1.24 (1.03,1.49) |
1.42 (1.22,1.67) |
1.57 (1.31,1.88) |
| Carbamazepine |
200 twice daily |
150 once |
150 once |
N/A |
N/A |
12 |
1.40 (1.32,1.49) |
1.43 (1.36,1.52) |
1.51 (1.41,1.62) |
| Carbamazepine- 10,11-epoxide |
daily |
daily |
|
|
0.73 (0.70,0.78) |
0.65 (0.63,0.66) |
0.59 (0.57,0.61) |
| Desipramine |
50 single dose |
N/A |
150 once daily |
N/A |
N/A |
8 |
1.24 (1.08,1.44) |
1.65 (1.36,2.02) |
NC |
| Digoxin |
0.5 single dose |
N/A |
150 once daily |
N/A |
N/A |
22 |
1.41 (1.29,1.55) |
1.08 (1.00,1.17) |
NC |
| Famciclovir |
500 single dose |
N/A |
N/A |
200 single dose |
N/A |
12 |
0.93 (0.78,1.11) |
0.91 (0.84,0.99) |
N/A |
| Ledipasvir |
90 once daily |
150 once dailyc |
150 once dailyc |
200 once dailyc |
10 once dailyc |
30 |
1.65 (1.53,1.78) |
1.79 (1.64,1.96) |
1.93 (1.74,2.15) |
| Sofosbuvir |
400 once daily |
1.28 (1.13,1.47) |
1.47 (1.35,1.59) |
N/A |
| GS-331007b |
1.29 (1.24,1.35) |
1.48 (1.44,1.53) |
1.66 (1.60,1.73) |
| Naloxone |
4-6 once daily |
150 once daily |
150 once daily |
N/A |
N/A |
17 |
0.72 (0.61,0.85) |
0.72 (0.59,0.87) |
N/A |
| Norgestimate/ ethinyl estradiold |
0.180/0.215/ 0.250 norgestimate once daily |
150 once dailyd |
150 once dailyd |
200 once dailyd |
N/A |
13 |
2.08 (2.00,2.17) |
2.26 (2.15,2.37) |
2.67 (2.43,2.92) |
| 0.025 ethinyl estradiol once daily |
0.94 (0.86,1.04) |
0.75 (0.69,0.81) |
0.56 (0.52,0.61) |
| Norgestromin |
0.180/0.215/ 0.250 norgestimate once daily / 0.025 ethinyl estradiol once daily |
N/A |
N/A |
200 once dailye |
25 once dailye |
15 |
1.17 (1.07,1.26) |
1.12 (1.07,1.17) |
1.16 (1.08,1.24) |
| Norgestrel |
1.10 (1.02,1.18) |
1.09 (1.01,1.18) |
1.11 (1.03,1.20) |
| Ethinyl estradiol |
1.22 (1.15,1.29) |
1.11 (1.07,1.16) |
1.02 (0.92,1.12) |
| R-Methadone |
80-120 daily |
150 once daily |
150 once daily |
N/A |
N/A |
11 |
1.01 (0.91,1.13) |
1.07 (0.96,1.19) |
1.10 (0.95,1.28) |
| S-Methadone |
0.96 (0.87,1.06) |
1.00 (0.89,1.12) |
1.02 (0.89,1.17) |
| Sertraline |
50 single dose |
150 once dailyc |
150 once dailyc |
200 once dailyc |
10 once dailyc |
19 |
1.14 (0.94,1.38) |
0.93 (0.77,1.13) |
N/A |
| Rifabutin |
150 once every other day |
150 once daily |
150 once daily |
N/A |
N/A |
12 |
1.09 (0.98,1.20)f |
0.92 (0.83,1.03)f |
0.94 (0.85,1.04)f |
| 25-O-desacetyl- rifabutin |
12 |
4.84 (4.09,5.74)f |
6.25 (5.08,7.69)f |
4.94 (4.04,6.04)f |
| Rosuvastatin |
10 single dose |
150 once daily |
150 once daily |
N/A |
N/A |
10 |
1.89 (1.48,2.42) |
1.38 (1.14,1.67) |
NC |
| Sofosbuvir |
400 once daily |
|
|
|
|
|
1.23 (1.07,1.42) |
1.37 (1.24,1.52) |
N/A |
| GS-331007b |
150 once dailyc |
150 once dailyc |
200 once dailyc |
10 once dailyc |
24 |
1.29 (1.25,1.33) |
1.48 (1.43,1.53) |
1.58 (1.52,1.65) |
| Velpatasvir |
100 once daily |
|
|
|
|
|
1.30 (1.17,1.45) |
1.50 (1.35,1.66) |
1.60 (1.44,1.78) |
| Sofosbuvir |
400 once daily |
|
|
|
|
|
1.27 (1.09,1.48) |
1.22 (1.12,1.32) |
NC |
| GS-331007b |
150 once |
150 once |
200 once |
10 once |
29 |
1.28 (1.25,1.32) |
1.43 (1.39,1.47) |
NC |
| Velpatasvir |
100 once daily |
dailyc |
dailyc |
dailyc |
dailyc |
0.96 (0.89,1.04) |
1.16 (1.06,1.27) |
1.46 (1.30,1.64) |
| Voxilaprevir |
100 + 100g once daily |
|
|
|
|
|
1.92 (1.63,2.26) |
2.71 (2.30,3.19) |
4.50 (3.68,5.50) |
FTC = emtricitabine; TAF = tenofovir alafenamide N/A = Not Applicable; NC = Not Calculated
a All interaction studies conducted in healthy volunteers.
b The predominant circulating inactive metabolite of sofosbuvir.
c Study conducted with GENVOYA.
d Study conducted with STRIBILD.
e Study conducted with DESCOVY.
f Comparison based on rifabutin 300 mg once daily.
g Study conducted with additional voxilaprevir 100 mg to achieve voxilaprevir exposures expected in HCV-infected patients. |
Microbiology
Mechanism Of Action
Elvitegravir
Elvitegravir inhibits the strand transfer activity of HIV-1 integrase (integrase strand transfer inhibitor; INSTI), an HIV-1 encoded enzyme that is required for viral replication. Inhibition of integrase prevents the integration of HIV-1 DNA into host genomic DNA, blocking the formation of the HIV-1 provirus and propagation of the viral infection. Elvitegravir does not inhibit human topoisomerases I or II.
Cobicistat
Cobicistat is a selective, mechanism-based inhibitor of cytochromes P450 of the CYP3A subfamily. Inhibition of CYP3A-mediated metabolism by cobicistat enhances the systemic exposure of CYP3A substrates, such as elvitegravir, where bioavailability is limited and half-life is shortened by CYP3A-dependent metabolism.
Emtricitabine
Emtricitabine, a synthetic nucleoside analog of cytidine, is phosphorylated by cellular enzymes to form emtricitabine 5'-triphosphate. Emtricitabine 5'-triphosphate inhibits the activity of the HIV-1 reverse transcriptase by competing with the natural substrate deoxycytidine 5'-triphosphate and by being incorporated into nascent viral DNA which results in chain termination. Emtricitabine 5'-triphosphate is a weak inhibitor of mammalian DNA polymerases α, β, ε, and mitochondrial DNA polymerase γ.
Tenofovir Alafenamide (TAF)
TAF is a phosphonamidate prodrug of tenofovir (2’deoxyadenosine monophosphate analog). Plasma exposure to TAF allows for permeation into cells and then TAF is intracellularly converted to tenofovir through hydrolysis by cathepsin A. Tenofovir is subsequently phosphorylated by cellular kinases to the active metabolite tenofovir diphosphate. Tenofovir diphosphate inhibits HIV-1 replication through incorporation into viral DNA by the HIV reverse transcriptase, which results in DNA chain-termination.
Tenofovir has activity that is specific to human immunodeficiency virus and hepatitis B virus. Cell culture studies have shown that both emtricitabine and tenofovir can be fully phosphorylated when combined in cells. Tenofovir diphosphate is a weak inhibitor of mammalian DNA polymerases that include mitochondrial DNA polymerase γ and there is no evidence of mitochondrial toxicity in cell culture based on several assays including mitochondrial DNA analyses.
Antiviral Activity In Cell Culture
Elvitegravir, Cobicistat, Emtricitabine, And Tenofovir Alafenamide (TAF)
The combination of elvitegravir, emtricitabine, and TAF was not antagonistic in cell culture combination antiviral activity assays and was not affected by the addition of cobicistat. In addition, elvitegravir, cobicistat, emtricitabine, and TAF were not antagonistic with a panel of representatives from the major classes of approved anti-HIV-1 agents (INSTIs, NNRTIs, NRTIs, and PIs).
Elvitegravir
The antiviral activity of elvitegravir against laboratory and clinical isolates of HIV-1 was assessed in T lymphoblastoid cell lines, monocyte/macrophage cells, and primary peripheral blood lymphocytes. The 50% effective concentrations (EC50) ranged from 0.02 to 1.7 nM. Elvitegravir displayed antiviral activity in cell culture against HIV-1 clades A, B, C, D, E, F, G, and O (EC50 values ranged from 0.1 to 1.3 nM) and activity against HIV-2 (EC50 value of 0.53 nM). Elvitegravir did not show inhibition of replication of HBV or HCV in cell culture.
Cobicistat
Cobicistat has no detectable antiviral activity in cell culture against HIV-1, HBV, or HCV and does not antagonize the antiviral activity of elvitegravir, emtricitabine, or tenofovir.
Emtricitabine
The antiviral activity of emtricitabine against laboratory and clinical isolates of HIV-1 was assessed in T lymphoblastoid cell lines, the MAGI-CCR5 cell line, and primary peripheral blood mononuclear cells. The EC50 values for emtricitabine were in the range of 0.0013–0.64 microM. Emtricitabine displayed antiviral activity in cell culture against HIV-1 clades A, B, C, D, E, F, and G (EC50 values ranged from 0.007– 0.075 microM) and showed strain specific activity against HIV-2 (EC50 values ranged from 0.007–1.5 microM).
Tenofovir Alafenamide (TAF)
The antiviral activity of TAF against laboratory and clinical isolates of HIV-1 subtype B was assessed in lymphoblastoid cell lines, PBMCs, primary monocyte/macrophage cells and CD4-T lymphocytes. The EC50 values for TAF ranged from 2.0 to 14.7 nM.
TAF displayed antiviral activity in cell culture against all HIV-1 groups (M, N, O), including sub-types A, B, C, D, E, F, and G (EC50 values ranged from 0.10 to 12.0 nM) and strain specific activity against HIV-2 (EC50 values ranged from 0.91 to 2.63 nM).
Resistance
In Cell Culture
Elvitegravir: HIV-1 isolates with reduced susceptibility to elvitegravir have been selected in cell culture. Reduced susceptibility to elvitegravir was associated with the primary integrase substitutions T66A/I, E92G/Q, S147G, and Q148R. Additional integrase substitutions observed in cell culture selection included D10E, S17N, H51Y, F121Y, S153F/Y, E157Q, D232N, R263K, and V281M.
Emtricitabine: HIV-1 isolates with reduced susceptibility to emtricitabine have been selected in cell culture. Reduced susceptibility to emtricitabine was associated with M184V or I substitutions in HIV-1 RT.
Tenofovir Alafenamide (TAF): HIV-1 isolates with reduced susceptibility to TAF have been selected in cell culture. HIV-1 isolates selected by TAF expressed a K65R substitution in HIV-1 RT, sometimes in the presence of S68N or L429I substitutions; in addition, a K70E substitution in HIV-1 RT was observed.
In Clinical Trials
In Treatment-Naive Subjects
In a pooled analysis of antiretroviral-naive subjects receiving GENVOYA in Studies 104 and 111, genotyping was performed on plasma HIV-1 isolates from all subjects with HIV-1 RNA greater than 400 copies per mL at confirmed virologic failure, at Week 144, or at time of early study drug discontinuation. As of Week 144, the development of genotypic resistance to elvitegravir, emtricitabine, or TAF was observed in 12 of 22 subjects with evaluable resistance data from paired baseline and GENVOYA treatment-failure isolates (12 of 866 subjects [1.4%]) compared with 13 of 20 treatment-failure isolates from subjects with evaluable resistance data in the STRIBILD treatment group (13 of 867 subjects [1.5%]). Of the 12 subjects with resistance development in the GENVOYA group, the resistance-associated substitutions that emerged were M184V/I (N=11) and K65R/N (N=2) in reverse transcriptase and T66T/A/I/V (N=2), E92Q (N=4), E138K (N=1), Q148Q/R (N=1) and N155H (N=2) in integrase. Of the 13 subjects with resistance development in the STRIBILD group, the resistance-associated substitutions that emerged were M184V/I (N=9), K65R/N (N=4), and L210W (N=1) in reverse transcriptase and E92Q/V (N=4), E138K (N=3), Q148R (N=2), and N155H/S (N=3) in integrase. In both treatment groups, most subjects who developed substitutions associated with resistance to elvitegravir also developed emtricitabine resistance-associated substitutions. These genotypic resistance results were confirmed by phenotypic analyses.
In Virologically Suppressed Subjects
Three virologic failure subjects were identified with emergent genotypic and phenotypic resistance to GENVOYA (all three with M184I or V and one with K219Q in reverse transcriptase; two with E92Q or G in integrase) out of 8 virologic failure subjects with resistance data in a clinical study of virologically suppressed subjects who switched from a regimen containing emtricitabine/TDF Â and a third agent to GENVOYA (Study 109, N=959).
Cross-Resistance
No cross-resistance has been demonstrated for elvitegravir-resistant HIV-1 isolates and emtricitabine or tenofovir, or for emtricitabine-or tenofovir-resistant isolates and elvitegravir.
Elvitegravir: Cross-resistance has been observed among INSTIs. Elvitegravir-resistant viruses showed varying degrees of cross-resistance in cell culture to raltegravir depending on the type and number of amino acid substitutions in HIV-1 integrase. Of the primary elvitegravir resistance-associated substitutions tested (T66A/I/K, E92G/Q, T97A, S147G, Q148H/K/R, and N155H), all but three (T66I, E92G, and S147G) conferred greater than 1.5-fold reduced susceptibility to raltegravir (above the biological cutoff for raltegravir) when introduced individually into a wild-type virus by site-directed mutagenesis. Of the primary raltegravir resistance-associated substitutions (Y143C/H/R, Q148H/K/R, and N155H), all but Y143C/H conferred greater than 2.5-fold reductions in susceptibility to elvitegravir (above the biological cutoff for elvitegravir). Some viruses expressing elvitegravir or raltegravir resistance amino acid substitutions maintain susceptibility to dolutegravir.
Emtricitabine: Cross-resistance has been observed among NRTIs. Emtricitabineresistant isolates harboring an M184V/I substitution in HIV-1 RT were cross-resistant to lamivudine. HIV-1 isolates containing the K65R RT substitution, selected in vivo by abacavir, didanosine, and tenofovir, demonstrated reduced susceptibility to inhibition by emtricitabine.
Tenofovir Alafenamide (TAF): Tenofovir resistance substitutions, K65R and K70E, result in reduced susceptibility to abacavir, didanosine, emtricitabine, lamivudine, and tenofovir.
HIV-1 with multiple TAMs (M41L, D67N, K70R, L210W, T215F/Y, K219Q/E/N/R), or multinucleoside resistant HIV-1 with a T69S double insertion mutation or with a Q151M mutation complex including K65R, showed reduced susceptibility to TAF in cell culture.
Animal Toxicology And/Or Pharmacology
Minimal to slight infiltration of mononuclear cells in the posterior uvea was observed in dogs with similar severity after three and nine month administration of TAF; reversibility was seen after a three month recovery period. At the NOAEL for eye toxicity, the systemic exposure in dogs was 5 (TAF) and 15 (tenofovir) times the exposure seen in humans at the recommended daily GENVOYA dosage.
Clinical Studies
Description Of Clinical Trials
The efficacy and safety of GENVOYA were evaluated in the studies summarized in Table 15.
Table 15 : Trials Conducted with GENVOYA in Subjects with HIV-1 Infection
| Trial |
Population |
Study Arms (N) |
Timepoint (Week) |
| Study 104a Study 111a |
Treatment-naive adults |
GENVOYA (866) STRIBILD (867) |
144 |
| Study 109b |
Virologically-suppressedd adults |
GENVOYA (959) ATRIPLA® or TRUVADA® + atazanavir + cobicistat or ritonavir or STRIBILD (477) |
96 |
| Study 112c |
Virologically-suppressedd adults with renal impairmente |
GENVOYA (242) |
144 |
| Study 1825c |
Virologically-suppressedd adults with ESRDf receiving chronic hemodialysis |
GENVOYA (55) |
48 |
| Study 106 (cohort 1)c |
Treatment-naive adolescents between the ages of 12 to less than 18 years (at least 35 kg) |
GENVOYA (50) |
48 |
| Study 106 (cohort 2)c |
Virologically-suppressed children between the ages of 6 to less than 12 years (at least 25 kg) |
GENVOYA (23) |
24 |
a Randomized, double blind, active controlled trial.
b Randomized, open label, active controlled trial.
c Open label trial.
d HIV-1 RNA less than 50 copies per mL.
e Estimated creatinine clearance between 30 and 69 mL per minute by Cockcroft-Gault method.
f End stage renal disease (estimated creatinine clearance of less than 15 mL per minute by Cockcroft-Gault method). |
Clinical Trial Results In HIV-1 Treatment-Naive Subjects
In both Study 104 and Study 111, subjects were randomized in a 1:1 ratio to receive either GENVOYA (N=866) once daily or STRIBILD (elvitegravir 150 mg, cobicistat 150 mg, emtricitabine 200 mg, TDF 300 mg) (N=867) once daily. The mean age was 36 years (range 18–76), 85% were male, 57% were White, 25% were Black, and 10% were Asian. Nineteen percent of subjects identified as Hispanic/Latino. The mean baseline plasma HIV-1 RNA was 4.5 log10 copies per mL (range 1.3–7.0) and 23% of subjects had baseline viral loads greater than 100,000 copies per mL. The mean baseline CD4+ cell count was 427 cells per mm³ (range 0–1360) and 13% had CD4+ cell counts less than 200 cells per mm³.
Pooled treatment outcomes of Studies 104 and 111 through Week 144 are presented in Table 16.
Table 16 : Pooled Virologic Outcomes of Randomized Treatment in Studies 104and 111 at Week 144a in Treatment-Naive Subjects
|
GENVOYA
(N=866) |
STRIBILD
(N=867) |
| HIV-1 RNA < 50 copies/mLb |
84% |
80% |
| HIV-1 RNA ≥ 50 copies/mLc |
5% |
4% |
| No Virologic Data at Week 144 Window |
11% |
16% |
| Discontinued Study Drug Due to AE or Deathd |
2% |
3% |
| Discontinued Study Drug Due to Other Reasons and Last Available HIV-1 RNA < 50 copies/mLe |
9% |
11% |
| Missing Data During Window but on Study Drug |
1% |
1% |
a Week 144 window was between Day 966 and 1049 (inclusive).
b The primary endpoint was assessed at Week 48 and the virologic success rate was 92% in the GENVOYA group and 90% in the STRIBILD group, with a treatment difference of 2.0% (95% CI: -0.7% to 4.7%). The difference at Week 144 was primarily driven by discontinuations due to other reasons with last available HIV-1 RNA <50 copies/mL.
c Included subjects who had ≥50 copies/mL in the Week 144 window; subjects who discontinued early due to lack or loss of efficacy; subjects who discontinued for reasons other than an adverse event (AE), death or lack or loss of efficacy and at the time of discontinuation had a viral value of ≥50 copies/mL.
d Includes subjects who discontinued due to AE or death at any time point from Day 1 through the time window if this resulted in no virologic data on treatment during the specified window.
e Includes subjects who discontinued for reasons other than an AE, death or lack or loss of efficacy; e.g., withdrew consent, loss to follow-up, etc. |
Treatment outcomes were similar across subgroups by age, sex, race, baseline viral load, and baseline CD4+ cell count.
In Studies 104 and 111, the mean increase from baseline in CD4+ cell count at Week 144 was 326 cells per mm³ in GENVOYA-treated subjects and 305 cells per mm³ in STRIBILD-treated subjects.
Clinical Trial Results In HIV-1 Virologically-Suppressed Subjects Who Switched To GENVOYA
In Study 109, the efficacy and safety of switching from ATRIPLA, TRUVADA plus atazanavir (given with either cobicistat or ritonavir), or STRIBILD to GENVOYA once daily were evaluated in a randomized, open-label trial of virologically-suppressed (HIV-1 RNA less than 50 copies per mL) HIV-1 infected adults (N=1436). Subjects must have been suppressed (HIV-1 RNA less than 50 copies per mL) on their baseline regimen for at least 6 months and had no known resistance-associated substitutions to any of the components of GENVOYA prior to study entry. Subjects were randomized in a 2:1 ratio to either switch to GENVOYA at baseline (N=959), or stay on their baseline antiretroviral regimen (N=477). Subjects had a mean age of 41 years (range 21–77), 89% were male, 67% were White, and 19% were Black. The mean baseline CD4+ cell count was 697 cells per mm³ (range 79–1951).
Subjects were stratified by prior treatment regimen. At screening, 42% of subjects were receiving TRUVADA plus atazanavir (given with either cobicistat or ritonavir), 32% were receiving STRIBILD, and 26% were receiving ATRIPLA.
Treatment outcomes of Study 109 through 96 weeks are presented in Table 17.
Table 17 : Virologic Outcomes of Study 109 at Week 96a in Virologically-Suppressed Subjects who Switched to GENVOYA
|
GENVOYA
(N=959) |
ATRIPLA or TRUVADA+atazanavir +cobicistat or ritonavir or STRIBILD
(N=477) |
| HIV-1 RNA < 50 copies/mL |
93% |
89% |
| HIV-1 RNA ≥ 50 copies/mLb |
2% |
2% |
| No Virologic Data at Week 48 Window |
5% |
9% |
| Discontinued Study Drug Due to AE or Deathc |
1% |
3% |
| Discontinued Study Drug Due to Other Reasons and Last Available HIV-1 RNA < 50 copies/mLd |
3% |
6% |
| Missing Data During Window but on Study Drug |
1% |
<1% |
aWeek 96 window was between Day 630 and 713 (inclusive).
b Included subjects who had ≥50 copies/mL in the Week 96 window; subjects who discontinued early due to lack or loss of efficacy; subjects who discontinued for reasons other than an adverse event (AE), death or lack or loss of efficacy and at the time of discontinuation had a viral value of ≥50 copies/mL.
c Includes subjects who discontinued due to AE or death at any time point from Day 1 through the time window if this resulted in no virologic data on treatment during the specified window.
d Includes subjects who discontinued for reasons other than an AE, death or lack or loss of efficacy; e.g., withdrew consent, loss to follow-up, etc. |
Treatment outcomes were similar across subgroups receiving ATRIPLA, TRUVADA plus atazanavir (given with either cobicistat or ritonavir), or STRIBILD prior to randomization. In Study 109, the mean increase from baseline in CD4+ cell count at Week 96 was 60 cells per mm³ in GENVOYA-treated subjects and 42 cells per mm³ in subjects who stayed on their baseline regimen.
Clinical Trial Results In HIV-1 Infected Subjects With Renal Impairment
Study 112: Virologically-Suppressed Adults With Renal Impairment
In Study 112, the efficacy and safety of GENVOYA once daily were evaluated in an open-label clinical trial of 248 HIV-1 infected subjects with renal impairment (estimated creatinine clearance between 30 and 69 mL per minute by Cockcroft-Gault method). Of the 248 enrolled, 6 were treatment-naive and 242 were virologically suppressed (HIV-1 RNA less than 50 copies per mL) for at least 6 months before switching to GENVOYA [see Use In Specific Populations and CLINICAL PHARMACOLOGY].
The mean age was 58 years (range 24–82), with 63 subjects (26%) who were 65 years of age or older. Seventy-nine percent were male, 63% were White, 18% were Black, and 14% were Asian. Thirteen percent of subjects identified as Hispanic/Latino. The mean baseline CD4+ cell count was 664 cells per mm³ (range 126–1813). At Week 144, 81% (197/242 virologically suppressed subjects) maintained HIV-1 RNA less than 50 copies per mL after switching to GENVOYA. All six treatment-naive subjects were virologically suppressed at Week 144. Five subjects among the entire study population had virologic failure at Week 144.
Study 1825: Virologically-Suppressed Adults With End Stage Renal Disease (ESRD) Receiving Chronic Hemodialysis
In Study 1825, the efficacy and safety of GENVOYA once daily were evaluated in an open-label clinical trial of 55 virologically-suppressed (HIV-1 RNA less than 50 copies per mL for at least 6 months before switching to GENVOYA) HIV-1 infected subjects with ESRD (estimated creatinine clearance of less than 15 mL per minute by Cockcroft-Gault method) receiving chronic hemodialysis for at least 6 months [see Use In Specific Populations and CLINICAL PHARMACOLOGY].
Subjects had a mean age of 48 years (range 23–64), 76% were male, 82% were Black, 18% were White, and 15% identified as Hispanic/Latino. The mean baseline CD4+ cell count was 545 cell per mm³ (range 205–1473). At Week 48, 82% (45/55) maintained HIV-1 RNA less than 50 copies per mL after switching to GENVOYA. Two subjects had HIV-1 RNA ≥50 copies per mL by Week 48. Seven subjects discontinued the study drug due to AE or other reasons while suppressed. One subject did not have an HIV-1 RNA measurement at Week 48.
Clinical Trial Results In HIV-1 Infected Pediatric Subjects Between The Ages Of 6 To Less Than 18
In Study 106, an open-label, single arm trial the efficacy, safety, and pharmacokinetics of GENVOYA in HIV-1 infected pediatric subjects were evaluated in treatment-naive adolescents between the ages of 12 to less than 18 years weighing at least 35 kg  (N=50) and in virologically-suppressed children between the ages of 6 to less than 12 years weighing at least 25 kg (N=23).
Cohort 1: Treatment-Naive Adolescents (12 to less than 18 years; at least 35 kg)
Subjects in cohort 1 treated with GENVOYA once daily had a mean age of 15 years (range 12-17); 44% were male, 12% were Asian, and 88% were Black. At baseline, mean plasma HIV-1 RNA was 4.6 log10 copies per mL (22% had baseline plasma HIV-1 RNA greater than 100,000 copies per mL), median CD4+ cell count was 456 cells per mm³ (range: 95 to 1110), and median CD4+ percentage was 23% (range: 7% to 45%).
In subjects in cohort 1 treated with GENVOYA, 92% (46/50) achieved HIV-1 RNA less than 50 copies per mL at Week 48. The mean increase from baseline in CD4+ cell count at Week 48 was 224 cells per mm³. Three of 50 subjects had virologic failure at Week 48; no emergent resistance to GENVOYA was detected through Week 48.
Cohort 2: Virologically-Suppressed Children (6 to less than 12 years; at least 25 kg)
Subjects in cohort 2 treated with GENVOYA once daily had a mean age of 10 years (range: 8-11), a mean baseline weight of 31.6 kg, 39% were male, 13% were Asian, and 78% were Black. At baseline, median CD4+ cell count was 969 cells/mm³ (range: 603 to 1421), and median CD4% was 39% (range: 30% to 51%).
After switching to GENVOYA, 100% (23/23) of subjects in cohort 2 remained suppressed (HIV-1 RNA < 50 copies/mL) at Week 24. From a mean (SD) baseline CD4+ cell count of 966 (201.7), the mean change from baseline in CD4+ cell count was -150 cells/mm³ and the mean (SD) change in CD4% was -1.5% (3.7%) at Week 24. All subjects maintained CD4+ cell counts above 400 cells/mm³ [see ADVERSE REACTIONS and Pediatric Use].