CLINICAL PHARMACOLOGY
Mechanism Of Action
GENVOYA is a fixed-dose combination of antiretroviral
drugs elvitegravir (plus the CYP3A inhibitor cobicistat), emtricitabine, and
tenofovir alafenamide [see Microbiology].
Pharmacodynamics
Cardiac Electrophysiology
Thorough QT studies have been conducted for elvitegravir,
cobicistat, and TAF. The effect of emtricitabine or the combination regimen
GENVOYA on the QT interval is not known.
Elvitegravir
In a thorough QT/QTc study in 126 healthy subjects,
elvitegravir (coadministered with 100 mg ritonavir) 125 mg and 250 mg (0.83 and
1.67 times the dose in GENVOYA) did not affect the QT/QTc interval and did not
prolong the PR interval.
Cobicistat
In a thorough QT/QTc study in 48 healthy subjects, a
single dose of cobicistat 250 mg and 400 mg (1.67 and 2.67 times the dose in
GENVOYA) did not affect the QT/QTc interval. Prolongation of the PR interval
was noted in subjects receiving cobicistat. The maximum mean (95% upper confidence
bound) difference in PR from placebo after baseline-correction was 9.5 (12.1)
msec for the 250 mg cobicistat dose and 20.2 (22.8) for the 400 mg cobicistat
dose. Because the 150 mg cobicistat dose used in the GENVOYA fixed-dose
combination tablet is lower than the lowest dose studied in the thorough QT
study, it is unlikely that treatment with GENVOYA will result in clinically
relevant PR prolongation.
Tenofovir Alafenamide (TAF)
In a thorough QT/QTc study in 48 healthy subjects, TAF at
the therapeutic dose or at a supratherapeutic dose approximately 5 times the
recommended therapeutic dose did not affect the QT/QTc interval and did not
prolong the PR interval.
Effects On Serum Creatinine
The effect of cobicistat on serum creatinine was
investigated in a Phase 1 study in subjects with an estimated creatinine
clearance of at least 80 mL per minute (N=18) and with an estimated creatinine clearance
of 50 to 79 mL per minute (N=12). A statistically significant change of
estimated creatinine clearance from baseline was observed after 7 days of
treatment with cobicistat 150 mg among subjects with an estimated creatinine
clearance of at least 80 mL per minute (-9.9 ± 13.1 mL/min) and subjects with
an estimated creatinine clearance between 50 and 79 mL per minute (-11.9
± 7.0 mL per minute). These decreases in estimated creatinine clearance were
reversible after cobicistat was discontinued. The actual glomerular filtration
rate, as determined by the clearance of probe drug iohexol, was not altered
from baseline following treatment of cobicistat among subjects with an
estimated creatinine clearance of at least 50 mL per minute, indicating
cobicistat inhibits tubular secretion of creatinine, reflected as a reduction
in estimated creatinine clearance without affecting the actual glomerular filtration
rate.
Pharmacokinetics
Absorption, Distribution, Metabolism, And Excretion
The pharmacokinetic (PK) properties of the components of
GENVOYA are provided in Table 6. The multiple dose PK parameters of
elvitegravir, cobicistat, emtricitabine, TAF and its metabolite tenofovir are
provided in Table 7.
Table 6 : Pharmacokinetic Properties of the Components
of GENVOYA
|
Elvitegravir |
Cobicistat |
Emtricitabine |
TAF |
Absorption |
Tmax (h) |
4 |
3 |
3 |
1 |
Effect of light meal (relative to fasting): AUC Ratio* |
1.34
(1.19, 1.51) |
1.03
(0.90, 1.17) |
0.95
(0.91, 1.00) |
1.15
(1.07, 1.24) |
Effect of high fat meal (relative to fasting): AUC Ratio* |
1.87
(1.66, 2.10) |
0.83
(0.73, 0.95) |
0.96
(0.92, 1.00) |
1.18
(1.09, 1.26) |
Distribution |
% Bound to human plasma proteins |
~99 |
~98 |
<4 |
~80 |
Source of protein binding data |
Ex vivo |
In vitro |
In vitro |
Ex vivo |
Blood-to-plasma ratio |
0.73 |
0.5 |
0.6 |
1.0 |
Metabolism |
Metabolism |
CYP3A (major) UGT1A1/3 (minor) |
CYP3A (major) CYP2D6 (minor) |
Not significantly metabolized |
Cathepsin A† (PBMCs) CES1 (hepatocytes) CYP3A (minimal) |
Elimination |
Major route of elimination |
Metabolism |
Metduunsm |
Glomerular
filtration and active tubular
secretion |
Metabolism
(>80% of oral dose) |
t½ (h)‡ |
12.9 |
3.5 |
10 |
0.51 |
% Of dose excreted in urine§ |
6.7 |
8.2 |
70 |
<1% |
% Of dose excreted in feces§ |
94.8 |
86.2 |
13.7 |
31.7 |
PBMCs = peripheral blood mononuclear cells; CES1 =
carboxylesterase 1.
*Values refer to geometric mean ratio in AUC [fed / fasted] and (90% confidence
interval). Elvitegravir light meal=~373 kcal, 20% fat; GENVOYA light meal=~4 00
kcal, 20% fat; elvitegravir and GENVOYA high fat meal=~800 kcal, 50% fat. Based
on the effect of food on elvitegravir, GENVOYA should be taken with food.
† In vivo, TAF is hydrolyzed within cells to form tenofovir (major metabolite),
which is phosphorylated to the active metabolite, tenofovir diphosphate. In
vitro studies have shown that TAF is metabolized to tenofovir by cathepsin A in
PBMCs and macrophages; and by CES1 in hepatocytes. Upon coadministration with
the moderate CYP3A inducer probe efavirenz, TAF exposure was not significantly
affected.
‡ t½ values refer to median terminal plasma half-life. Note that the
pharmacologically active metabolite, tenofovir diphosphate, has a half-life of
150–180 hours within PBMCs.
§ Dosing in mass balance studies: elvitegravir (single dose administration of [14C]
elvitegravir coadministered with 100 mg ritonavir); cobicistat (single dose
administration of [14C] cobicistat after multiple dosing of
cobicistat for six days); emtricitabine (single dose administration of [14C]
emtricitabine after multiple dosing of emtricitabine for ten days); TAF (single
dose administration of [14 C] TAF). |
Table 7 : Multiple Dose Pharmacokinetic Parameters of
Elvitegravir, Cobicistat, Emtricitabine, Tenofovir Alafenamide (TAF) and its
Metabolite Tenofovir Following Oral Administration of GENVOYA with Food in
HIV-Infected Adults
Parameter Mean (CV%) |
Elvitegravir* |
Cobicistat* |
Emtricitabine* |
TAF† |
Tenofovir‡ |
Cmax (microgram per mL) |
2.1 (33.7) |
1.5 (28.4) |
2.1 (20.2) |
0.16 (51.1) |
0.02 (26.1) |
AUCtau (microgram•hour per mL) |
22.8 (34.7) |
9.5 (33.9) |
11.7 (16.6) |
0.21 (71.8) |
0.29 (27.4) |
Ctrough (microgram per mL) |
0.29 (61.7) |
0.02 (85.2) |
0.10 (46.7) |
NA |
0.01 (28.5) |
CV = Coefficient of Variation; NA = Not Applicable
*From Intensive PK analysis in a Phase 2 trial in HIV infected adults, Study
102 (N=19).
† From Population PK analysis in two trials of treatment-naive adults with
HIV-1 infection, Studies 104 and 111 (N=539).
‡ From Population PK analysis in two trials of treatment-naive adults with
HIV-1 infection, Studies 104 and 111 (N=84 1). |
Special Populations
Geriatric Patients
Pharmacokinetics of elvitegravir, cobicistat,
emtricitabine and tenofovir have not been fully evaluated in the elderly (65
years of age and older). Age does not have a clinically relevant effect on
exposures of TAF up to 75 years of age [see Use In Specific Populations].
Pediatric Patients
Mean exposures of elvitegravir, cobicistat, and TAF
achieved in 24 pediatric subjects aged 12 to less than 18 years who received
GENVOYA in Study 106 were decreased compared to exposures achieved in
treatment-naive adults following administration of GENVOYA, but were overall
deemed acceptable based on exposure-response relationships; emtricitabine
exposure in adolescents was similar to that in treatment-naive adults (Table
8).
Table 8 : Multiple Dose Pharmacokinetic Parameters of
Elvitegravir, Cobicistat, Emtricitabine, Tenofovir Alafenamide (TAF) and its
Metabolite Tenofovir Following Oral Administration of GENVOYA in HIV-Infected
Pediatric Subjects Aged 12 to less than 18 Years*
Parameter Mean (CV%) |
Elvitegravir |
Cobicistat |
Emtricitabine |
TAF |
Tenofovir |
Cmax (microgram per mL) |
2.2 (19.2) |
1.2 (35.0) |
2.3 (22.5) |
0.17 (64.4) |
0.02 (23.7) |
AUCtau (microgram-hour per mL) |
23.8 (25.5) |
8.2† (36.1) |
14.4 (23.9) |
0.20† (50.0) |
0.29† (18.8) |
Ctrough (microgram per mL) |
0.30 (81.0) |
0.03‡ (180.0) |
0.10† (38.9) |
NA |
0.01 (21.4) |
CV = Coefficient of Variation; NA = Not Applicable
*From Intensive PK analysis in a trial in treatment-naive pediatric subjects
with HIV-1 infection, cohort 1 of Study 106 (N=24 ).
† N=23
‡ N=15 |
Exposures of the components of GENVOYA achieved in 23
pediatric subjects between the ages of 6 to less than 12 years who received
GENVOYA in Study 106 were higher (20 to 80% for AUC) than exposures achieved in
adults following the administration of GENVOYA; however, the increase was not
considered clinically significant (Table 9) [see Use In Specific Populations].
Table 9 : Multiple Dose Pharmacokinetic Parameters of
Elvitegravir, Cobicistat, Emtricitabine, Tenofovir Alafenamide (TAF) and its
Metabolite Tenofovir Following Oral Administration of GENVOYA in HIV-Infected
Pediatric Subjects Aged 6 to les s than 12 Years*
Parameter Mean (CV%) |
Elvitegravir |
Cobicistat |
Emtricitabine |
TAF |
Tenofovir |
Cmax (microgram per mL) |
3.1 (38.7) |
2.1 (46.7) |
3.4 (27.0) |
0.31 (61.2) |
0.03 (20.8) |
AUCtau (microgram-hour per mL) |
33.8† (57.8) |
15.9‡ (51.7) |
20.6† (18.9) |
0.33 (44.8) |
0.44 (20.9) |
Ctrough (microgram per mL) |
0.37 (118.5) |
0.1 (168.7) |
0.11 (24.1) |
NA |
0.02 (24.9) |
CV = Coefficient of Variation; NA = Not Applicable
*From Intensive PK analysis in a trial in virologically-suppressed pediatric
subjects with HIV-1 infection, cohort 2 of Study 106 (N=23).
† N=22
‡ N=20 |
Race, Gender
No clinically significant differences in pharmacokinetics
of GENVOYA have been identified based on race or gender.
Patients With Renal Impairment
The pharmacokinetics of GENVOYA in HIV-1 infected
subjects with mild or moderate renal impairment (estimated creatinine clearance
between 30 and 69 mL per minute by Cockcroft-Gault method), and in HIV-1
infected subjects with ESRD (estimated creatinine clearance of less than 15 Ml per
minute by Cockcroft-Gault method) receiving chronic hemodialysis were evaluated
in subsets of virologically suppressed subjects in respective open-label
trials, Study 112 and Study 1825. The pharmacokinetics of elvitegravir,
cobicistat, and tenofovir alafenamide were similar among healthy subjects,
subjects with mild or moderate renal impairment, and subjects with ESRD receiving
chronic hemodialysis; increases in emtricitabine and tenofovir exposures in
subjects with renal impairment were not considered clinically relevant (Table
10).
Table 10 : Pharmacokinetics of GENVOYA in HIV-Infected
Adults with Renal Impairment as Compared to Subjects with Normal Renal Function
Estimated Creatinine Clearance* |
AUCtau (microgram^hour per mL) Mean (CV%) |
≥90 mL per minute (N=18)† |
60-89 mL per minute (N=11)‡ |
30-59 mL per minute (N=18)§ |
<15 mL per minute (N=12)¶ |
Emtricitabine |
11.4 (11.9) |
17.6 (18.2) |
23.0 (23.6) |
62.9 (48.0)# |
Tenofovir |
0.32 (14.9) |
0.46 (31.5) |
0.61 (28.4) |
8.72 (39.4)Þ |
*By Cockcroft-Gault method.
† From a Phase 2 study in HIV-infected adults with normal renal function.
‡ These subjects from Study 112 had an estimated creatinine clearance between
60 and 69 mL per minute.
§ Study 112.
¶ Study 1825; PK assessed prior to hemodialysis following 3 consecutive daily
doses of GENVOYA.
# N=11.
Þ N=10. |
Patients With Hepatic Impairment
Elvitegravir And Cobicistat
A study of the pharmacokinetics of elvitegravir
(administered with the CYP3A inhibitor cobicistat) was performed in healthy
subjects and subjects with moderate hepatic impairment (Child-Pugh Class B). No
clinically relevant differences in elvitegravir or cobicistat pharmacokinetics
were observed between subjects with moderate hepatic impairment and healthy subjects
[see Use In Specific Populations].
Emtricitabine
The pharmacokinetics of emtricitabine has not been
studied in subjects with hepatic impairment; however, emtricitabine is not
significantly metabolized by liver enzymes, so the impact of liver impairment
should be limited.
Tenofovir Alafenamide (TAF)
Clinically relevant changes in TAF and tenofovir
pharmacokinetics were not observed in subjects with mild to moderate
(Child-Pugh Class A and B) hepatic impairment [see Use In Specific
Populations].
Hepatitis B And/Or Hepatitis C Virus Co-infection
Elvitegravir
Limited data from population pharmacokinetic analysis
(N=24) indicated that hepatitis B and/or C virus infection had no clinically
relevant effect on the exposure of elvitegravir (administered with the CYP3A
inhibitor cobicistat).
Cobicistat
There were insufficient pharmacokinetic data in the
clinical trials to determine the effect of hepatitis B and/or C virus infection
on the pharmacokinetics of cobicistat.
Emtricitabine And Tenofovir Alafenamide (TAF)
Pharmacokinetics of emtricitabine and TAF have not been
fully evaluated in subjects coinfected with hepatitis B and/or C virus.
Drug Interaction Studies
[see also CONTRAINDICATIONS and DRUG
INTERACTIONS]
The drug-drug interaction studies described in Tables
11–14 were conducted with GENVOYA, elvitegravir (coadministered with cobicistat
or ritonavir), cobicistat administered alone, or TAF (administered alone or
coadministered with emtricitabine).
As GENVOYA should not be administered with other
antiretroviral medications, information regarding drug-drug interactions with
other antiretrovirals agents is not provided.
The effects of coadministered drugs on the exposure of
elvitegravir, emtricitabine, and TAF are shown in Table 11, Table 12, and Table
13 respectively. The effects of GENVOYA or its components on the exposure of
coadministered drugs are shown in Table 14. For information regarding clinical recommendations,
see DRUG INTERACTIONS.
Table 11 : Drug Interactions : Changes in
Pharmacokinetic Parameters for Elvitegravir in the Presence of the
Coadministered Drug*
Coadministered Drug |
Dose of Coadministered Drug (mg) |
Elvitegravir Dose (mg) |
CYP3A Inhibitor Cobicistat or Ritonavir Dose (mg) |
N |
Mean Ratio of Elvitegravir Pharm aco kine tic Parameters (90% CI); No effect = 1.00 |
Cmax |
AUC |
Cmin |
Maximum strength antacid† |
20 mL single dose given 4 hours before elvitegravir |
50 single dose |
Ritonavir 100 single dose |
8 |
0.95 (0.84,1.07) |
0.96 (0.88,1.04) |
1.04 (0.93,1.17) |
20 mL single dose given 4 hours after elvitegravir |
10 |
0.98 (0.88,1.10) |
0.98 (0.91,1.06) |
1.00 (0.90,1.11) |
20 mL single dose given 2 hours before elvitegravir |
11 |
0.82 (0.74,0.91) |
0.85 (0.79,0.91) |
0.90 (0.82,0.99) |
20 mL single dose given 2 hours after elvitegravir |
10 |
0.79 (0.71,0.88) |
0.80 (0.75,0.86) |
0.80 (0.73,0.89) |
Atorvastatin |
10 single dose |
150 once daily‡ |
Cobicistat 150 once daily‡ |
16 |
0.91 (0.85,0.98) |
0.92 (0.87,0.98) |
0.88 (0.81,0.96) |
Carbamazepine |
200 twice daily |
150 once daily |
Cobicistat 150 once daily |
12 |
0.55 (0.49,0.61) |
0.31 (0.28,0.33) |
0.03 (0.02,0.40) |
Famotidine |
40 once daily given 12 hours after elvitegravir |
150 once daily |
Cobicistat 150 once daily |
10 |
1.02 (0.89,1.17) |
1.03 (0.95,1.13) |
1.18 (1.05,1.32) |
40 once daily given simultaneously with elvitegravir |
16 |
1.00 (0.92,1.10) |
1.03 (0.98,1.08) |
1.07 (0.98,1.17) |
Ketoconazole |
200 twice daily |
150 once daily |
Ritonavir 100 once daily |
18 |
1.17 (1.04,1.33) |
1.48 (1.36,1.62) |
1.67 (1.48,1.88) |
Ledipasvir/ Sofosbuvir |
90/400 once daily |
150 once daily‡ |
Cobicistat 150 once daily‡ |
30 |
0.98 (0.90,1.07) |
1.11 (1.02,1.20) |
1.46 (1.28,1.66) |
Omeprazole |
40 once daily given 2 hours before elvitegravir |
50 once daily |
Ritonavir 100 once daily |
9 |
0.93 (0.83,1.04) |
0.99 (0.91,1.07) |
0.94 (0.85,1.04) |
20 once daily given 2 hours before elvitegravir |
150 once daily |
Cobicistat 150 once daily |
11 |
1.16 (1.04,1.30) |
1.10 (1.02,1.19) |
1.13 (0.96,1.34) |
20 once daily given 12 hours after elvitegravir |
11 |
1.03 (0.92,1.15) |
1.05 (0.93,1.18) |
1.10 (0.92,1.32) |
Rifabutin |
150 once every other day |
150 once daily |
Cobicistat 150 once daily |
12 |
0.91 (0.84,0.99) |
0.79 (0.74,0.85) |
0.33 (0.27,0.40) |
Rosuvastatin |
10 single dose |
150 once daily |
Cobicistat 150 once daily |
10 |
0.94 (0.83,1.07) |
1.02 (0.91,1.14) |
0.98 (0.83,1.16) |
Sertraline |
50 single dose |
150 once daily‡ |
Cobicistat 150 once daily‡ |
19 |
0.88 (0.82,0.93) |
0.94 (0.89,0.98) |
0.99 (0.93,1.05) |
Sofosbuvir/ Velpatasvir |
400/100 once daily |
150 once daily‡ |
Cobicistat 150 once daily‡ |
24 |
0.87 (0.80,0.94) |
0.94 (0.88,1.00) |
1.08 (0.97,1.20) |
Sofosbuvir/ Velpatasvir/ Voxilaprevir |
400/100/100 + 100 Voxilaprevir§ once daily |
150 once daily‡ |
Cobicistat 150 once daily‡ |
29 |
0.79 (0.75,0.85) |
0.94 (0.88,1.00) |
1.32 (1.17,1.49) |
*All interaction studies conducted in healthy volunteers.
† Maximum strength antacid contained 80 mg aluminum hydroxide, 80 mg magnesium
hydroxide, and 8 mg simethicone, per mL.
‡ Study conducted with GENVOYA.
§ Study conducted with additional voxilaprevir 100 mg to achieve voxilaprevir
exposures expected in HCVinfected patients. |
Table 12 : Drug Interactions : Changes in
Pharmacokinetic Parameters for Emtricitabine in the Presence of the
Coadministered Drug*
Coadministered Drug |
Dose of Coadministered Drug (mg) |
Emtricitabine Dose (mg) |
N |
Mean Ratio of Emtricitabine Pharm aco kine tic Parameters (90% CI); No effect = 1.00 |
Cmax |
AUC |
Cmin |
Famciclovir |
500 single dose |
200 single dose |
12 |
0.90 (0.80,1.01) |
0.93 (0.87,0.99) |
NC |
* All interaction studies conducted in healthy
volunteers. |
Table 13 : Drug Interactions : Changes in
Pharmacokinetic Parameters for Tenofovir Alafenamide (TAF) in the Presence of
the Coadministered Drug*
Coadministered Drug |
Coadministered Drug (mg) |
Dose (mg) |
N |
Mean Ratio of
Emtricitabine Parameters (90% CI); No effect = 1.00 |
Cmax |
AUC |
Cmin |
Cobicistat |
150 once daily |
8 once daily |
12 |
2.83 (2.20,3.65) |
2.65 (2.29,3.07) |
NC |
Ledipasvir/ Sofosbuvir |
90/400 once daily |
10 once daily† |
30 |
0.90 (0.73,1.11) |
0.86 (0.78,0.95) |
NC |
Sertraline |
50 single dose |
10 once daily† |
19 |
1.00 (0.86,1.16) |
0.96 (0.89,1.03) |
NC |
Sofosbuvir/ Velpatasvir |
400/100 once daily |
10 once daily† |
24 |
0.80 (0.68,0.94) |
0.87 (0.81,0.94) |
NC |
Sofosbuvir/ Velpatasvir/ Voxilaprevir |
400/100/100 + 100 Voxilaprevir‡ once daily |
10 once daily† |
29 |
0.79 (0.68,0.92) |
0.93 (0.85,1.01) |
NC |
NC = Not Calculated
*All interaction studies conducted in healthy volunteers.
† Study conducted with GENVOYA.
‡ Study conducted with additional voxilaprevir 100 mg to achieve voxilaprevir
exposures expected in HCV-infected patients. |
Table 14 : Drug Interactions : Changes in
Pharmacokinetic Parameters for Coadministered Drug in the Presence of GENVOYA
or the Individual Components*
Coadministered Drug |
Dose of Coadministered Drug (mg) |
Elvitegravir Dose (mg) |
CYP3A Inhibitor Cobicistat Dose (mg) |
FTC Dose (mg) |
TAF Dose (mg) |
N |
Mean Ratio of Coadminis tered Drug Pharmacokinetic Parameters (90% CI); No effect = 1.00 |
Cmax |
AUC |
Cmin |
Atorvastatin |
10 single dose |
150 once daily† |
150 once daily† |
200 once daily† |
10 once daily† |
16 |
2.32 (1.91,2.82) |
2.60 (2.31,2.93) |
NC |
Buprenorphine |
16 - 24 once daily |
150 once daily |
150 once daily |
N/A |
N/A |
17 |
1.12 (0.98,1.27) |
1.35 (1.18,1.55) |
1.66 (1.43,1.93) |
Norbuprenorphine |
1.24 (1.03,1.49) |
1.42 (1.22,1.67) |
1.57 (1.31,1.88) |
Carbamazepine |
200 twice daily |
150 once daily |
150 once daily |
N/A |
N/A |
12 |
1.40 (1.32,1.49) |
1.43 (1.36,1.52) |
1.51 (1.41,1.62) |
Carbamazepine- 10,11-epoxide |
0.73 (0.70,0.78) |
0.65 (0.63,0.66) |
0.59 (0.57,0.61) |
Desipramine |
50 single dose |
N/A |
150 once daily |
N/A |
N/A |
8 |
1.24 (1.08,1.44) |
1.65 (1.36,2.02) |
NC |
Digoxin |
0.5 single dose |
N/A |
150 once daily |
N/A |
N/A |
22 |
1.41 (1.29,1.55) |
1.08 (1.00,1.17) |
NC |
Famciclovir |
500 single dose |
N/A |
N/A |
200 single dose |
N/A |
12 |
0.93 (0.78,1.11) |
0.91 (0.84,0.99) |
N/A |
Ledipasvir |
90 once daily |
150 once daily† |
150 once daily† |
200 once daily† |
10 once daily† |
30 |
1.65 (1.53,1.78) |
1.79 (1.64,1.96) |
1.93 (1.74,2.15) |
Sofosbuvir |
400 once daily |
1.28 (1.13,1.47) |
1.47 (1.35,1.59) |
N/A |
GS-331007t |
1.29 (1.24,1.35) |
1.48 (1.44,1.53) |
1.66 (1.60,1.73) |
Naloxone |
4-6 once daily |
150 once daily |
150 once daily |
N/A |
N/A |
17 |
0.72 (0.61,0.85) |
0.72 (0.59,0.87) |
N/A |
Norgestimate/ ethinyl estradiol§ |
0.180/0.215/ 0.250 norgestimate once daily |
150 once daily§ |
150 once daily§ |
200 once daily§ |
N/A |
13 |
2.08 (2.00,2.17) |
2.26 (2.15,2.37) |
2.67 (2.43,2.92) |
0.025 ethinyl estradiol once daily |
0.94 (0.86,1.04) |
0.75 (0.69,0.81) |
0.56 (0.52,0.61) |
Norgestromin |
0.180/0.215/ 0.250 norgestimate once daily / 0 .0 25 ethinyl estradiol once daily |
N/A |
N/A |
200 once daily¶ |
25 once daily¶ |
15 |
1.17 (1.07,1.26) |
1.12 (1.07,1.17) |
1.16 (1.08,1.24) |
Norgestrel |
1.10 (1.02,1.18) |
1.09 (1.01,1.18) |
1.11 (1.03,1.20) |
Ethinyl estradiol |
1.22 (1.15,1.29) |
1.11 (1.07,1.16) |
1.02 (0.92,1.12) |
R-Methadone |
80-120 daily |
150 once daily |
150 once daily |
N/A |
N/A |
11 |
1.01 (0.91,1.13) |
1.07 (0.96,1.19) |
1.10 (0.95,1.28) |
S-Methadone |
0.96 (0.87,1.06) |
1.00 (0.89,1.12) |
1.02 (0.89,1.17) |
Sertraline |
50 single dose |
150 once dailyt |
150 once daily† |
200 once daily† |
10 once daily† |
19 |
1.14 (0.94,1.38) |
0.93 (0.77,1.13) |
N/A |
Rifabutin |
150 once every other day |
150 once daily |
150 once daily |
N/A |
N/A |
12 |
1.09 (0.98,1.20)# |
0.92 (0.83,1.03)# |
0.94 (0.85,1.04)# |
25-O-desacetyl- rifabutin |
12 |
4.84 (4.09,5.74)# |
6.25 (5.08,7.69)# |
4.94 (4.04,6.04)# |
Rosuvastatin |
10 single dose |
150 once daily |
150 once daily |
N/A |
N/A |
10 |
1.89 (1.48,2.42) |
1.38 (1.14,1.67) |
NC |
Sofosbuvir |
400 once daily |
150 once daily† |
150 once daily† |
200 once daily† |
10 once daily† |
24 |
1.23 (1.07,1.42) |
1.37 (1.24,1.52) |
N/A |
GS-331007‡ |
1.29 (1.25,1.33) |
1.48 (1.43,1.53) |
1.58 (1.52,1.65) |
Velpatasvir |
100 once daily |
1.30 (1.17,1.45) |
1.50 (1.35,1.66) |
1.60 (1.44,1.78) |
Sofosbuvir |
400 once daily |
150 once daily† |
150 once daily† |
200 once daily† |
10 once daily† |
29 |
1.27 (1.09,1.48) |
1.22 (1.12,1.32) |
NC |
GS-331007‡ |
1.28 (1.25,1.32) |
1.43 (1.39,1.47) |
NC |
Velpatasvir |
100 once daily |
0.96 (0.89,1.04) |
1.16 (1.06,1.27) |
1.46 (1.30,1.64) |
Voxilaprevir |
100 + 100Þ once daily |
1.92 (1.63,2.26) |
2.71 (2.30,3.19) |
4.50 (3.68,5.50) |
FTC = emtricitabine; TAF = tenofovir alafenamide
N/A = Not Applicable; NC = Not Calculated
*All interaction studies conducted in healthy volunteers.
† Study conducted with GENVOYA.
‡ The predominant circulating inactive metabolite of sofosbuvir.
§ Study conducted with STRIBILD.
¶ Study conducted with DESCOVY.
# Comparison based on rifabutin 300 mg once daily.
Þ Study conducted with additional voxilaprevir 100 mg to achieve voxilaprevir
exposures expected in HCV-infected patients. |
Microbiology
Mechanism Of Action
Elvitegravir
Elvitegravir inhibits the strand transfer activity of
HIV-1 integrase (integrase strand transfer inhibitor; INSTI), an HIV-1 encoded
enzyme that is required for viral replication. Inhibition of integrase prevents
the integration of HIV-1 DNA into host genomic DNA, blocking the formation of
the HIV-1 provirus and propagation of the viral infection. Elvitegravir does
not inhibit human topoisomerases I or II.
Cobicistat
Cobicistat is a selective, mechanism-based inhibitor of
cytochromes P450 of the CYP3A subfamily. Inhibition of CYP3A-mediated
metabolism by cobicistat enhances the systemic exposure of CYP3A substrates,
such as elvitegravir, where bioavailability is limited and half-life is
shortened by CYP3A-dependent metabolism.
Emtricitabine
Emtricitabine, a synthetic nucleoside analog of cytidine,
is phosphorylated by cellular enzymes to form emtricitabine 5'-triphosphate.
Emtricitabine 5'-triphosphate inhibits the activity of the HIV-1 reverse
transcriptase by competing with the natural substrate deoxycytidine
5'-triphosphate and by being incorporated into nascent viral DNA which results
in chain termination. Emtricitabine 5'- triphosphate is a weak inhibitor of
mammalian DNA polymerases α, β,,
and mitochondrial DNA polymerase γ.
Tenofovir Alafenamide (TAF)
TAF is a phosphonamidate prodrug of tenofovir
(2'-deoxyadenosine monophosphate analog). Plasma exposure to TAF allows for
permeation into cells and then TAF is intracellularly converted to tenofovir
through hydrolysis by cathepsin A. Tenofovir is subsequently phosphorylated by
cellular kinases to the active metabolite tenofovir diphosphate. Tenofovir diphosphate
inhibits HIV-1 replication through incorporation into viral DNA by the HIV
reverse transcriptase, which results in DNA chain-termination.
Tenofovir has activity that is specific to human
immunodeficiency virus and hepatitis B virus. Cell culture studies have shown
that both emtricitabine and tenofovir can be fully phosphorylated when combined
in cells. Tenofovir diphosphate is a weak inhibitor of mammalian DNA
polymerases that include mitochondrial DNA polymerase γ and there is no
evidence of mitochondrial toxicity in cell culture based on several assays
including mitochondrial DNA analyses.
Antiviral Activity In Cell Culture
Elvitegravir, Cobicistat, Emtricitabine, And Tenofovir
Alafenamide (TAF)
The combination of elvitegravir, emtricitabine, and TAF
was not antagonistic in cell culture combination antiviral activity assays and
was not affected by the addition of cobicistat. In addition, elvitegravir,
cobicistat, emtricitabine, and TAF were not antagonistic with a panel of
representatives from the major classes of approved anti-HIV-1 agents (INSTIs,
NNRTIs, NRTIs, and PIs).
Elvitegravir
The antiviral activity of elvitegravir against laboratory
and clinical isolates of HIV-1 was assessed in T lymphoblastoid cell lines,
monocyte/macrophage cells, and primary peripheral blood lymphocytes. The 50%
effective concentrations (EC ) ranged from 0.02 to 1.7 nM. Elvitegravir displayed
antiviral activity in cell culture against HIV-1 clades A, B, C, D, E, F, G,
and O (EC values ranged from 0.1 to 1.3 nM) and activity against HIV-2 (EC
value of 0.53 nM). Elvitegravir did not show inhibition of replication of HBV
or HCV in cell culture.
Cobicistat
Cobicistat has no detectable antiviral activity in cell
culture against HIV-1, HBV, or HCV and does not antagonize the antiviral
activity of elvitegravir, emtricitabine, or tenofovir.
Emtricitabine
The antiviral activity of emtricitabine against
laboratory and clinical isolates of HIV-1 was assessed in T lymphoblastoid cell
lines, the MAGI-CCR5 cell line, and primary peripheral blood mononuclear cells.
The EC50 values for emtricitabine were in the range of 0.0013–0.64
microM. Emtricitabine displayed antiviral activity in cell culture against
HIV-1 clades A, B, C, D, E, F, and G (EC50 values ranged from
0.007–0.075 microM) and showed strain specific activity against HIV-2 (EC50
values ranged from 0.007–1.5 microM).
Tenofovir Alafenamide (TAF)
The antiviral activity of TAF against laboratory and
clinical isolates of HIV-1 subtype B was assessed in lymphoblastoid cell lines,
PBMCs, primary monocyte/macrophage cells and CD4-T lymphocytes. The EC values
for TAF ranged from 2.0 to 14.7 nM.
TAF displayed antiviral activity in cell culture against
all HIV-1 groups (M, N, O), including sub-types A, B, C, D, E, F, and G (EC
values ranged from 0.10 to 12.0 nM) and strain specific activity against HIV-2
(EC50 values ranged from 0.91 to 2.63 nM).
Resistance
In Cell Culture
Elvitegravir: HIV-1 isolates with reduced susceptibility
to elvitegravir have been selected in cell culture. Reduced susceptibility to
elvitegravir was associated with the primary integrase substitutions T66A/I,
E92G/Q, S147G, and Q148R. Additional integrase substitutions observed in cell
culture selection included D10E, S17N, H51Y, F121Y, S153F/Y, E157Q, D232N,
R263K, and V281M.
Emtricitabine: HIV-1 isolates with reduced susceptibility
to emtricitabine have been selected in cell culture. Reduced susceptibility to
emtricitabine was associated with M184V or I substitutions in HIV-1 RT.
Tenofovir Alafenamide (TAF): HIV-1 isolates with reduced susceptibility
to TAF have been selected in cell culture. HIV-1 isolates selected by TAF
expressed a K65R substitution in HIV-1 RT, sometimes in the presence of S68N or
L429I substitutions; in addition, a K70E substitution in HIV-1 RT was observed.
In Clinical Trials
In Treatment-Naive Subjects
In a pooled analysis of antiretroviral-naive subjects
receiving GENVOYA in Studies 104 and 111, genotyping was performed on plasma
HIV-1 isolates from all subjects with HIV-1 RNA greater than 400 copies per mL
at confirmed virologic failure, at Week 144, or at time of early study drug discontinuation.
As of Week 144, the development of genotypic resistance to elvitegravir, emtricitabine,
or TAF was observed in 12 of 22 subjects with evaluable resistance data from
paired baseline and GENVOYA treatment-failure isolates (12 of 866 subjects
[1.4%]) compared with 13 of 20 treatment-failure isolates from subjects with
evaluable resistance data in the STRIBILD treatment group (13 of 867 subjects
[1.5%]). Of the 12 subjects with resistance development in the GENVOYA group, the
resistance-associated substitutions that emerged were M184V/I (N=11) and K65R/N
(N=2) in reverse transcriptase and T66T/A/I/V (N=2), E92Q (N=4), E138K (N=1),
Q148Q/R (N=1) and N155H (N=2) in integrase. Of the 13 subjects with resistance
development in the STRIBILD group, the resistance-associated substitutions that
emerged were M184V/I (N=9), K65R/N (N=4), and L210W (N=1) in reverse
transcriptase and E92Q/V (N=4), E138K (N=3), Q148R (N=2), and N155H/S (N=3) in integrase.
In both treatment groups, most subjects who developed substitutions associated
with resistance to elvitegravir also developed emtricitabine
resistance-associated substitutions. These genotypic resistance results were
confirmed by phenotypic analyses.
In Virologically Suppressed Subjects
Three virologic failure subjects were identified with
emergent genotypic and phenotypic resistance to GENVOYA (all three with M184I
or V and one with K219Q in reverse transcriptase; two with E92Q or G in integrase)
out of 8 virologic failure subjects with resistance data in a clinical study of
virologically-suppressed subjects who switched from a regimen containing
emtricitabine/TDF and a third agent to GENVOYA (Study 109, N=959).
Cross-Resistance
No cross-resistance has been demonstrated for
elvitegravir-resistant HIV-1 isolates and emtricitabine or tenofovir, or for
emtricitabine- or tenofovir-resistant isolates and elvitegravir.
Elvitegravir
Cross-resistance has been observed among
INSTIs. Elvitegravir-resistant viruses showed varying degrees of
cross-resistance in cell culture to raltegravir depending on the type and
number of amino acid substitutions in HIV-1 integrase. Of the primary
elvitegravir resistance-associated substitutions tested (T66A/I/K, E92G/Q,
T97A, S147G, Q148H/K/R, and N155H), all but three (T66I, E92G, and S147G)
conferred greater than 1.5-fold reduced susceptibility to raltegravir (above
the biological cutoff for raltegravir) when introduced individually into a
wild-type virus by site-directed mutagenesis. Of the primary raltegravir
resistance-associated substitutions (Y143C/H/R, Q148H/K/R, and N155H), all but
Y143C/H conferred greater than 2.5-fold reductions in susceptibility to
elvitegravir (above the biological cutoff for elvitegravir). Some viruses
expressing elvitegravir or raltegravir resistance amino acid substitutions
maintain susceptibility to dolutegravir.
Emtricitabine
Cross-resistance has been observed among
NRTIs. Emtricitabine-resistant isolates harboring an M184V/I substitution in
HIV-1 RT were cross-resistant to lamivudine. HIV-1 isolates containing the K65R
RT substitution, selected in vivo by abacavir, didanosine, and tenofovir, demonstrated
reduced susceptibility to inhibition by emtricitabine.
Tenofovir Alafenamide (TAF): Tenofovir resistance
substitutions, K65R and K70E, result in reduced susceptibility to abacavir,
didanosine, emtricitabine, lamivudine, and tenofovir. HIV-1 with multiple TAMs
(M41L, D67N, K70R, L210W, T215F/Y, K219Q/E/N/R), or multinucleoside resistant
HIV-1 with a T69S double insertion mutation or with a Q151M mutation complex
including K65R, showed reduced susceptibility to TAF in cell culture.
Animal Toxicology And/Or Pharmacology
Minimal to slight infiltration of mononuclear cells in
the posterior uvea was observed in dogs with similar severity after three and
nine month administration of TAF; reversibility was seen after a three month
recovery period. At the NOAEL for eye toxicity, the systemic exposure in dogs
was 5 (TAF) and 15 (tenofovir) times the exposure seen in humans at the
recommended daily GENVOYA dosage.
Clinical Studies
Description Of Clinical Trials
The efficacy and safety of GENVOYA were evaluated in the
studies summarized in Table 15.
Table 15 : Trials Conducted with GENVOYA in Subjects
with HIV-1 Infection
Trial |
Population |
Study Arms (N) |
Timepoint (Week) |
Study 104* Study 111* |
Treatment-naive adults |
GENVOYA (866) STRIBILD (867) |
144 |
Study 109† |
Virologically- suppressed‡ adults |
GENVOYA (959) ATRIPLA® or TRUVADA® + atazanavir + cobicistat or ritonavir or STRIBILD (477) |
96 |
Study 112§ |
Virologically- suppressed‡ adults with renal impairment¶ |
GENVOYA (242) |
144 |
Study 1825§ |
Virologically-suppressed‡ adults with ESRD# receiving chronic hemodialysis |
GENVOYA (55) |
48 |
Study 106 (cohort 1)§ |
Treatment-naive adolescents between the ages of 12 to less than 18 years (at least 35 kg) |
GENVOYA (50) |
48 |
Study 106 (cohort 2)§ |
Virologically-suppressed children between the ages of 6 to less than 12 years (at least 25 kg) |
GENVOYA (23) |
24 |
*Randomized, double blind, active controlled trial.
† Randomized, open label, active controlled trial.
‡ HIV-1 RNA less than 50 copies per mL.
§ Open label trial.
¶ Estimated creatinine clearance between 30 and 69 mL per minute by Cockcroft- Gault
method.
# End stage renal disease (estimated creatinine clearance of less than 15 mL
per minute by Cockcroft-Gault method). |
Clinical Trial Results In HIV-1 Treatment-Naive Subjects
In both Study 104 and Study 111, subjects were randomized
in a 1:1 ratio to receive either GENVOYA (N=866) once daily or STRIBILD
(elvitegravir 150 mg, cobicistat 150 mg, emtricitabine 200 mg, TDF 300 mg)
(N=867) once daily. The mean age was 36 years (range 18–76), 85% were male, 57%
were White, 25% were Black, and 10% were Asian. Nineteen percent of subjects
identified as Hispanic/Latino. The mean baseline plasma HIV-1 RNA was 4.5 log
copies per mL (range 1.3–7.0) and 23% of subjects had baseline viral loads
greater than 100,000 copies per mL. The mean baseline CD4+ cell count was 427
cells per mm³ (range 0–1360) and 13% had CD4+ cell counts less than 200 cells
per mm³.
Pooled treatment outcomes of Studies 104 and 111 through
Week 144 are presented in Table 16.
Table 16 : Pooled Virologic Outcomes of Randomized
Treatment in Studies 104 and 111 at Week 144* in Treatment-Naive Subjects
|
GENVOYA
(N=866) |
STRIBILD
(N=867) |
HIV-1 RNA < 50 copies/ml† |
84% |
80% |
HIV-1 RNA ≥ 50 copies/mL‡ |
5% |
4% |
No Virologic Data at Week 144 Window |
11% |
16% |
Discontinued Study Drug Due to AE or Death§ |
2% |
3% |
Discontinued Study Drug Due to Other Reasons and Last Available HIV-1 RNA < 50 copies/mL¶ |
9% |
11% |
Missing Data During Window but on Study Drug |
1% |
1% |
*Week 14 4 window was between Day 966 and 104 9
(inclusive).
† The primary endpoint was assessed at Week 4 8 and the virologic success rate
was 92% in the GENVOYA group and 90% in the STRIBILD group, with a treatment difference
of 2.0% (95% CI: -0.7% to 4 .7%). The difference at Week 14 4 was primarily
driven by discontinuations due to other reasons with last available HIV-1 RNA
<50 copies/mL.
‡ Included subjects who had ≥50 copies/mL in the Week 14 4 window;
subjects who discontinued early due to lack or loss of efficacy; subjects who
discontinued for reasons other than an adverse event (AE), death or lack or
loss of efficacy and at the time of discontinuation had a viral value of
≥ 50 copies/mL.
§ Includes subjects who discontinued due to AE or death at any time point from
Day 1 through the time window if this resulted in no virologic data on
treatment during the specified window.
¶ Includes subjects who discontinued for reasons other than an AE, death or
lack or loss of efficacy; e.g., withdrew consent, loss to follow-up, etc. |
Treatment outcomes were similar across subgroups by age,
sex, race, baseline viral load, and baseline CD4+ cell count.
In Studies 104 and 111, the mean increase from baseline
in CD4+ cell count at Week 144 was 326 cells per mm³ in GENVOYA-treated
subjects and 305 cells per mm³ in STRIBILD-treated subjects.
Clinical Trial Result s In HIV-1 Virologically-Suppressed
Subjects Who Switched To GENVOYA
In Study 109, the efficacy and safety of switching from
ATRIPLA, TRUVADA plus atazanavir (given with either cobicistat or ritonavir),
or STRIBILD to GENVOYA once daily were evaluated in a randomized, open-label
trial of virologically-suppressed (HIV-1 RNA less than 50 copies per mL) HIV-1
infected adults (N=1436). Subjects must have been suppressed (HIV-1 RNA less
than 50 copies per mL) on their baseline regimen for at least 6 months and had
no known resistance-associated substitutions to any of the components of
GENVOYA prior to study entry. Subjects were randomized in a 2:1 ratio to either
switch to GENVOYA at baseline (N=959), or stay on their baseline antiretroviral
regimen (N=477). Subjects had a mean age of 41 years (range 21–77), 89% were
male, 67% were White, and 19% were Black. The mean baseline CD4+ cell count was
697 cells per mm³ (range 79– 1951).
Subjects were stratified by prior treatment regimen. At
screening, 42% of subjects were receiving TRUVADA plus atazanavir (given with
either cobicistat or ritonavir), 32% were receiving STRIBILD, and 26% were
receiving ATRIPLA.
Treatment outcomes of Study 109 through 96 weeks are
presented in Table 17.
Table 17 : Virologic Outcomes of Study 109 at Week 96*
in Virologically- Suppressed Subjects who Switched to GENVOYA
|
GENVOYA
(N=959) |
ATRIPLA or TRUVADA+atazanavir +cobicistat or ritonavir or STRIBILD
(N=477) |
HIV-1 RNA < 50 copies/mL |
93% |
89% |
HIV-1 RNA ≥ 50 copies/mL† |
2% |
2% |
No Virologic Data at Week 48 Window |
5% |
9% |
Discontinued Study Drug Due to AE or Death‡ |
1% |
3% |
Discontinued Study Drug Due to Other Reasons and Last Available HIV-1 RNA < 50 copies/mL § |
3% |
6% |
Missing Data During Window but on Study Drug |
1% |
<1% |
*Week 96 window was between Day 630 and 713 (inclusive).
† Included subjects who had ≥50 copies/mL in the Week 96 window; subjects
who discontinued early due to lack or loss of efficacy; subjects who
discontinued for reasons other than an adverse event (AE), death or lack or
loss of efficacy and at the time of discontinuation had a viral value of
≥50 copies/mL.
‡ Includes subjects who discontinued due to AE or death at any time point from
Day 1 through the time window if this resulted in no virologic data on
treatment during the specified window.
§ Includes subjects who discontinued for reasons other than an AE, death or
lack or loss of efficacy; e.g., withdrew consent, loss to follow-up, etc. |
Treatment outcomes were similar across subgroups
receiving ATRIPLA, TRUVADA plus atazanavir (given with either cobicistat or
ritonavir), or STRIBILD prior to randomization. In Study 109, the mean increase
from baseline in CD4+ cell count at Week 96 was 60 cells per mm³ in
GENVOYA-treated subjects and 42 cells per mm³ in subjects who stayed on their
baseline regimen.
Clinical Trial Results In HIV-1 Infected Subjects With Renal
Impairment
Study 112: Virologically-Suppressed Adults With Renal
Impairment
In Study 112, the efficacy and safety of GENVOYA once
daily were evaluated in an open-label clinical trial of 248 HIV-1 infected subjects
with renal impairment (estimated creatinine clearance between 30 and 69 mL per
minute by Cockcroft-Gault method). Of the 248 enrolled, 6 were treatment-naive
and 242 were virologically suppressed (HIV-1 RNA less than 50 copies per mL)
for at least 6 months before switching to GENVOYA [see Use In Specific
Populations and CLINICAL PHARMACOLOGY].
The mean age was 58 years (range 24–82), with 63 subjects
(26%) who were 65 years of age or older. Seventy-nine percent were male, 63%
were White, 18% were Black, and 14% were Asian. Thirteen percent of subjects
identified as Hispanic/Latino. The mean baseline CD4+ cell count was 664 cells
per mm³ (range 126–1813). At Week 144, 81% (197/242 virologically suppressed
subjects) maintained HIV-1 RNA less than 50 copies per mL after switching to
GENVOYA. All six treatment-naive subjects were virologically suppressed at Week
144. Five subjects among the entire study population had virologic failure at
Week 144.
Study 1825: Virologically-Suppressed Adults With End
Stage Renal Disease (ESRD) Receiving Chronic Hemodialysis
In Study 1825, the efficacy and safety of GENVOYA once
daily were evaluated in an open-label clinical trial of 55
virologically-suppressed (HIV-1 RNA less than 50 copies per mL for at least 6 months
before switching to GENVOYA) HIV-1 infected subjects with ESRD (estimated
creatinine clearance of less than 15 mL per minute by Cockcroft-Gault method)
receiving chronic hemodialysis for at least 6 months [see Use In Specific
Populations and CLINICAL PHARMACOLOGY].
Subjects had a mean age of 48 years (range 23–64), 76%
were male, 82% were Black, 18% were White, and 15% identified as
Hispanic/Latino. The mean baseline CD4+ cell count was 545 cell per mm³ (range
205–1473). At Week 48, 82% (45/55) maintained HIV-1 RNA less than 50 copies per
mL after switching to GENVOYA. Two subjects had HIV-1 RNA ≥ 50 copies per
mL by Week 48. Seven subjects discontinued the study drug due to AE or other
reasons while suppressed. One subject did not have an HIV-1 RNA measurement at
Week 48.
Clinical Trial Results in HIV-1 Infected Pediatric
Subjects Between the Ages of 6 to Less than 18
In Study 106, an open-label, single arm trial the
efficacy, safety, and pharmacokinetics of GENVOYA in HIV-1 infected pediatric
subjects were evaluated in treatment-naive adolescents between the ages of 12 to
less than 18 years weighing at least 35 kg (N=50) and in
virologically-suppressed children between the ages of 6 to less than 12 years
weighing at least 25 kg (N=23).
Cohort 1: Treatment-naive Adolescents (12 to less than 18
years; at least 35 kg)
Subjects in cohort 1 treated with GENVOYA once daily had
a mean age of 15 years (range 12-17); 44% were male, 12% were Asian, and 88%
were Black. At baseline, mean plasma HIV-1 RNA was 4.6 log copies per mL (22%
had baseline plasma HIV-1 RNA greater than 100,000 copies per mL), median CD4+
cell count was 456 cells per mm³ (range: 95 to 1110), and median CD4+
percentage was 23% (range: 7% to 45%).
In subjects in cohort 1 treated with GENVOYA, 92% (46/50)
achieved HIV-1 RNA less than 50 copies per mL at Week 48. The mean increase
from baseline in CD4+ cell count at Week 48 was 224 cells per mm³. Three of 50
subjects had virologic failure at Week 48; no emergent resistance to GENVOYA
was detected through Week 48.
Cohort 2: Virologically-suppressed children (6 to less
than 12 years; at least 25 kg)
Subjects in cohort 2 treated with GENVOYA once daily had
a mean age of 10 years (range: 8–11), a mean baseline weight of 31.6 kg, 39%
were male, 13% were Asian, and 78% were Black. At baseline, median CD4+ cell
count was 969 cells/mm³ (range: 603 to 1421), and median CD4% was 39% (range: 30%
to 51%).
After switching to GENVOYA, 100% (23/23) of subjects in
cohort 2 remained suppressed (HIV-1 RNA < 50 copies/mL) at Week 24. From a
mean (SD) baseline CD4+ cell count of 966 (201.7), the mean change from
baseline in CD4+ cell count was -150 cells/mm³ and the mean (SD) change in CD4%
was -1.5% (3.7%) at Week 24. All subjects maintained CD4+ cell counts above 400
cells/mm³ [see ADVERSE REACTIONS and Pediatric Use].