CLINICAL PHARMACOLOGY
Mechanism Of Action
Animal studies have indicated the following mode of
action. At the cellular level, alendronate shows preferential localization to
sites of bone resorption, specifically under osteoclasts. The osteoclasts adhere
normally to the bone surface but lack the ruffled border that is indicative of
active resorption. Alendronate does not interfere with osteoclast recruitment
or attachment, but it does inhibit osteoclast activity. Studies in mice on the
localization of radioactive [3H]alendronate in bone showed about 10-
fold higher uptake on osteoclast surfaces than on osteoblast surfaces. Bones
examined 6 and 49 days after [3H]alendronate administration in rats
and mice, respectively, showed that normal bone was formed on top of the
alendronate, which was incorporated inside the matrix. While incorporated in
bone matrix, alendronate is not pharmacologically active. Thus, alendronate
must be continuously administered to suppress osteoclasts on newly formed
resorption surfaces. Histomorphometry in baboons and rats showed that
alendronate treatment reduces bone turnover (i.e., the number of sites at which
bone is remodeled). In addition, bone formation exceeds bone resorption at
these remodeling sites, leading to progressive gains in bone mass.
Pharmacodynamics
Alendronate is a bisphosphonate that binds to bone
hydroxyapatite and specifically inhibits the activity of osteoclasts, the
bone-resorbing cells. Alendronate reduces bone resorption with no direct effect
on bone formation, although the latter process is ultimately reduced because
bone resorption and formation are coupled during bone turnover.
Osteoporosis In Postmenopausal Women
Osteoporosis is characterized by low bone mass that leads
to an increased risk of fracture. The diagnosis can be confirmed by the finding
of low bone mass, evidence of fracture on x-ray, a history of osteoporotic
fracture, or height loss or kyphosis, indicative of vertebral (spinal)
fracture. Osteoporosis occurs in both males and females but is most common
among women following the menopause, when bone turnover increases and the rate
of bone resorption exceeds that of bone formation. These changes result in
progressive bone loss and lead to osteoporosis in a significant proportion of
women over age 50. Fractures, usually of the spine, hip, and wrist, are the
common consequences. From age 50 to age 90, the risk of hip fracture in white
women increases 50-fold and the risk of vertebral fracture 15- to 30-fold. It
is estimated that approximately 40% of 50-year-old women will sustain one or
more osteoporosis-related fractures of the spine, hip, or wrist during their
remaining lifetimes. Hip fractures, in particular, are associated with
substantial morbidity, disability, and mortality.
Daily oral doses of alendronate (5, 20, and 40 mg for six
weeks) in postmenopausal women produced biochemical changes indicative of
dose-dependent inhibition of bone resorption, including decreases in urinary
calcium and urinary markers of bone collagen degradation (such as
deoxypyridinoline and cross-linked N-telopeptides of type I collagen). These
biochemical changes tended to return toward baseline values as early as 3 weeks
following the discontinuation of therapy with alendronate and did not differ
from placebo after 7 months.
Long-term treatment of osteoporosis with FOSAMAX 10
mg/day (for up to five years) reduced urinary excretion of markers of bone
resorption, deoxypyridinoline and cross-linked N-telopeptides of type l collagen,
by approximately 50% and 70%, respectively, to reach levels similar to those
seen in healthy premenopausal women. Similar decreases were seen in patients in
osteoporosis prevention studies who received FOSAMAX 5 mg/day. The decrease in
the rate of bone resorption indicated by these markers was evident as early as
one month and at three to six months reached a plateau that was maintained for
the entire duration of treatment with FOSAMAX. In osteoporosis treatment
studies FOSAMAX 10 mg/day decreased the markers of bone formation, osteocalcin
and bone specific alkaline phosphatase by approximately 50%, and total serum
alkaline phosphatase by approximately 25 to 30% to reach a plateau after 6 to
12 months. In osteoporosis prevention studies FOSAMAX 5 mg/day decreased
osteocalcin and total serum alkaline phosphatase by approximately 40% and 15%,
respectively. Similar reductions in the rate of bone turnover were observed in
postmenopausal women during one-year studies with once weekly FOSAMAX 70 mg for
the treatment of osteoporosis and once weekly FOSAMAX 35 mg for the prevention
of osteoporosis. These data indicate that the rate of bone turnover reached a
new steadystate, despite the progressive increase in the total amount of
alendronate deposited within bone. As a result of inhibition of bone
resorption, asymptomatic reductions in serum calcium and phosphate concentrations
were also observed following treatment with FOSAMAX. In the long-term studies, reductions
from baseline in serum calcium (approximately 2%) and phosphate (approximately
4 to 6%) were evident the first month after the initiation of FOSAMAX 10 mg. No
further decreases in serum calcium were observed for the five-year duration of
treatment; however, serum phosphate returned toward prestudy levels during
years three through five. Similar reductions were observed with FOSAMAX 5
mg/day. In one-year studies with once weekly FOSAMAX 35 and 70 mg, similar reductions
were observed at 6 and 12 months. The reduction in serum phosphate may reflect
not only the positive bone mineral balance due to FOSAMAX but also a decrease
in renal phosphate reabsorption.
Osteoporosis In Men
Treatment of men with osteoporosis with FOSAMAX 10 mg/day
for two years reduced urinary excretion of cross-linked N-telopeptides of type
I collagen by approximately 60% and bone-specific alkaline phosphatase by
approximately 40%. Similar reductions were observed in a one-year study in men
with osteoporosis receiving once weekly FOSAMAX 70 mg.
Glucocorticoid-Induced Osteoporosis
Sustained use of glucocorticoids is commonly associated
with development of osteoporosis and resulting fractures (especially vertebral,
hip, and rib). It occurs both in males and females of all ages. Osteoporosis
occurs as a result of inhibited bone formation and increased bone resorption
resulting in net bone loss. Alendronate decreases bone resorption without
directly inhibiting bone formation.
In clinical studies of up to two years' duration, FOSAMAX
5 and 10 mg/day reduced cross-linked Ntelopeptides of type I collagen (a marker
of bone resorption) by approximately 60% and reduced bonespecific alkaline phosphatase
and total serum alkaline phosphatase (markers of bone formation) by approximately
15 to 30% and 8 to 18%, respectively. As a result of inhibition of bone
resorption, FOSAMAX 5 and 10 mg/day induced asymptomatic decreases in serum
calcium (approximately 1 to 2%) and serum phosphate (approximately 1 to 8%).
Paget's Disease of Bone
Paget's disease of bone is a chronic, focal skeletal
disorder characterized by greatly increased and disorderly bone remodeling.
Excessive osteoclastic bone resorption is followed by osteoblastic new bone
formation, leading to the replacement of the normal bone architecture by
disorganized, enlarged, and weakened bone structure.
Clinical manifestations of Paget's disease range from no
symptoms to severe morbidity due to bone pain, bone deformity, pathological
fractures, and neurological and other complications. Serum alkaline phosphatase,
the most frequently used biochemical index of disease activity, provides an
objective measure of disease severity and response to therapy.
FOSAMAX decreases the rate of bone resorption directly,
which leads to an indirect decrease in bone formation. In clinical trials,
FOSAMAX 40 mg once daily for six months produced significant decreases in serum
alkaline phosphatase as well as in urinary markers of bone collagen
degradation. As a result of the inhibition of bone resorption, FOSAMAX induced
generally mild, transient, and asymptomatic decreases in serum calcium and
phosphate.
Pharmacokinetics
Absorption
Relative to an intravenous reference dose, the mean oral
bioavailability of alendronate in women was 0.64% for doses ranging from 5 to
70 mg when administered after an overnight fast and two hours before a
standardized breakfast. Oral bioavailability of the 10 mg tablet in men (0.59%)
was similar to that in women when administered after an overnight fast and 2
hours before breakfast.
FOSAMAX 70 mg oral solution and FOSAMAX 70 mg tablet are
equally bioavailable.
A study examining the effect of timing of a meal on the
bioavailability of alendronate was performed in 49 postmenopausal women.
Bioavailability was decreased (by approximately 40%) when 10 mg alendronate was
administered either 0.5 or 1 hour before a standardized breakfast, when
compared to dosing 2 hours before eating. In studies of treatment and
prevention of osteoporosis, alendronate was effective when administered at
least 30 minutes before breakfast.
Bioavailability was negligible whether alendronate was
administered with or up to two hours after a standardized breakfast. Concomitant
administration of alendronate with coffee or orange juice reduced bioavailability
by approximately 60%.
Distribution
Preclinical studies (in male rats) show that alendronate
transiently distributes to soft tissues following 1 mg/kg intravenous administration
but is then rapidly redistributed to bone or excreted in the urine. The mean
steady-state volume of distribution, exclusive of bone, is at least 28 L in
humans. Concentrations of drug in plasma following therapeutic oral doses are
too low (less than 5 ng/mL) for analytical detection. Protein binding in human
plasma is approximately 78%.
Metabolism
There is no evidence that alendronate is metabolized in
animals or humans.
Excretion
Following a single intravenous dose of [14C]alendronate,
approximately 50% of the radioactivity was excreted in the urine within 72
hours and little or no radioactivity was recovered in the feces. Following a
single 10 mg intravenous dose, the renal clearance of alendronate was 71 mL/min
(64, 78; 90% confidence interval [CI]), and systemic clearance did not exceed
200 mL/min. Plasma concentrations fell by more than 95% within 6 hours
following intravenous administration. The terminal half-life in humans is
estimated to exceed 10 years, probably reflecting release of alendronate from
the skeleton. Based on the above, it is estimated that after 10 years of oral
treatment with FOSAMAX (10 mg daily) the amount of alendronate released daily
from the skeleton is approximately 25% of that absorbed from the
gastrointestinal tract.
Specific Populations
Gender: Bioavailability and the fraction of an
intravenous dose excreted in urine were similar in men and women.
Geriatric: Bioavailability and disposition
(urinary excretion) were similar in elderly and younger patients. No dosage
adjustment is necessary in elderly patients.
Race: Pharmacokinetic differences due to race have
not been studied.
Renal Impairment: Preclinical studies show that,
in rats with kidney failure, increasing amounts of drug are present in plasma,
kidney, spleen, and tibia. In healthy controls, drug that is not deposited in
bone is rapidly excreted in the urine. No evidence of saturation of bone uptake
was found after 3 weeks dosing with cumulative intravenous doses of 35 mg/kg in
young male rats. Although no formal renal impairment pharmacokinetic study has
been conducted in patients, it is likely that, as in animals, elimination of alendronate
via the kidney will be reduced in patients with impaired renal function.
Therefore, somewhat greater accumulation of alendronate in bone might be
expected in patients with impaired renal function.
No dosage adjustment is necessary for patients with
creatinine clearance 35 to 60 mL/min. FOSAMAX is not recommended for patients
with creatinine clearance less than 35 mL/min due to lack of experience with
alendronate in renal failure.
Hepatic Impairment: As there is evidence that
alendronate is not metabolized or excreted in the bile, no studies were
conducted in patients with hepatic impairment. No dosage adjustment is
necessary.
Drug Interactions
Intravenous ranitidine was shown to double the
bioavailability of oral alendronate. The clinical significance of this
increased bioavailability and whether similar increases will occur in patients
given oral H2-antagonists is unknown.
In healthy subjects, oral prednisone (20 mg three times
daily for five days) did not produce a clinically meaningful change in the oral
bioavailability of alendronate (a mean increase ranging from 20 to 44%).
Products containing calcium and other multivalent cations
are likely to interfere with absorption of alendronate.
Animal Toxicology And/Or Pharmacology
The relative inhibitory activities on bone resorption and
mineralization of alendronate and etidronate were compared in the Schenk assay,
which is based on histological examination of the epiphyses of growing rats. In
this assay, the lowest dose of alendronate that interfered with bone
mineralization (leading to osteomalacia) was 6000-fold the antiresorptive dose.
The corresponding ratio for etidronate was one to one. These data suggest that
alendronate administered in therapeutic doses is highly unlikely to induce
osteomalacia.
Clinical Studies
Treatment Of Osteoporosis In Postmenopausal Women
Daily Dosing
The efficacy of FOSAMAX 10 mg daily was assessed in four
clinical trials. Study 1, a three-year, multicenter, double-blind, placebo-controlled,
US clinical study enrolled 478 patients with a BMD Tscore at or below minus 2.5
with or without a prior vertebral fracture; Study 2, a three-year, multicenter,
double-blind, placebo-controlled Multinational clinical study enrolled 516
patients with a BMD Tscore at or below minus 2.5 with or without a prior
vertebral fracture; Study 3, the Three-Year Study of the Fracture Intervention
Trial (FIT) a study which enrolled 2027 postmenopausal patients with at least one
baseline vertebral fracture; and Study 4, the Four-Year Study of FIT: a study
which enrolled 4432 postmenopausal patients with low bone mass but without a
baseline vertebral fracture.
Effect On Fracture Incidence
To assess the effects of FOSAMAX on the incidence of
vertebral fractures (detected by digitized radiography; approximately one third
of these were clinically symptomatic), the U.S. and Multinational studies were
combined in an analysis that compared placebo to the pooled dosage groups of FOSAMAX
(5 or 10 mg for three years or 20 mg for two years followed by 5 mg for one
year). There was a statistically significant reduction in the proportion of
patients treated with FOSAMAX experiencing one or more new vertebral fractures
relative to those treated with placebo (3.2% vs. 6.2%; a 48% relative risk
reduction). A reduction in the total number of new vertebral fractures (4.2 vs.
11.3 per 100 patients) was also observed. In the pooled analysis, patients who
received FOSAMAX had a loss in stature that was statistically significantly
less than was observed in those who received placebo (-3.0 mm vs. -4.6 mm).
The Fracture Intervention Trial (FIT) consisted of two
studies in postmenopausal women: the Three- Year Study of patients who had at
least one baseline radiographic vertebral fracture and the Four-Year Study of
patients with low bone mass but without a baseline vertebral fracture. In both
studies of FIT, 96% of randomized patients completed the studies (i.e., had a
closeout visit at the scheduled end of the study); approximately 80% of
patients were still taking study medication upon completion.
Fracture Intervention Trial: Three-Year Study
(patients with at least one baseline radiographic vertebral fracture)
This randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled,
2027-patient study (FOSAMAX, n=1022; placebo, n=1005) demonstrated that
treatment with FOSAMAX resulted in statistically significant reductions in fracture
incidence at three years as shown in Table 6.
Table 6: Effect of FOSAMAX on Fracture Incidence in
the Three-Year Study of FIT (patients with vertebral fracture at baseline)
|
Percent of Patients |
FOSAMAX
(n=1022) |
Placebo
(n=1005) |
Absolute Reduction in Fracture Incidence |
Relative Reduction in Fracture Risk % |
Patients with: |
Vertebral fractures (diagnosed by X-ray)* |
≥ 1 new vertebral fracture |
7.9 |
15.0 |
7.1 |
47† |
≥ 2 new vertebral fractures |
0.5 |
4.9 |
4.4 |
90† |
Clinical (symptomatic) fractures |
Any clinical (symptomatic) fracture |
13.8 |
18.1 |
4.3 |
26‡ |
≥ 1 clinical (symptomatic) vertebral fracture |
2.3 |
5.0 |
2.7 |
54§ |
Hip fracture |
1.1 |
2.2 |
1.1 |
51¶ |
Wrist (forearm) fracture |
2.2 |
4.1 |
1.9 |
48¶ |
*Number evaluable for vertebral fractures: FOSAMAX, n=984
; placebo, n=966
†p < 0.001,
‡p=0.007,
§p < 0.01,
¶p < 0.05 |
Furthermore, in this population of patients with baseline
vertebral fracture, treatment with FOSAMAX significantly reduced the incidence
of hospitalizations (25.0% vs. 30.7%).
In the Three-Year Study of FIT, fractures of the hip
occurred in 22 (2.2%) of 1005 patients on placebo and 11 (1.1%) of 1022
patients on FOSAMAX, p=0.047. Figure 1 displays the cumulative incidence of hip
fractures in this study.
Figure 1
Fracture Intervention Trial: Four-Year Study (patients
with low bone mass but without a baseline radiographic vertebral fracture)
This randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, 4432-patient
study (FOSAMAX, n=2214; placebo, n=2218) further investigated the reduction in
fracture incidence due to FOSAMAX. The intent of the study was to recruit women
with osteoporosis, defined as a baseline femoral neck BMD at least two standard
deviations below the mean for young adult women. However, due to subsequent
revisions to the normative values for femoral neck BMD, 31% of patients were
found not to meet this entry criterion and thus this study included both
osteoporotic and non-osteoporotic women. The results are shown in Table 7 for
the patients with osteoporosis.
Table 7: Effect of FOSAMAX on Fracture Incidence in Osteoporotic
Patients in the Four-Year Study of FIT (patients without vertebral fracture at
baseline)
|
Percent of Patients |
FOSAMAX
(n=1545) |
Placebo
(n=1521) |
Absolute Reduction in Fracture Incidence |
Relative Reduction in Fracture Risk (%) |
Patients with: |
Vertebral fractures (diagnosed by X-ray)† |
≥ 1 new vertebral fracture |
2.5 |
4.8 |
2.3 |
48* |
≥ 2 new vertebral fractures |
0.1 |
O 6 |
0.5 |
78 § |
Clinical (symptomatic) fractures |
Any clinical (symptomatic) fracture |
12.9 |
16.2 |
3.3 |
22¶ |
≥ 1 clinical (symptomatic) vertebral fracture |
1.0 |
1.0 |
0.6 |
41 (NS)# |
Hip fracture |
1.0 |
1.4 |
0.4 |
29 (NS)# |
Wrist (forearm) fracture |
3.9 |
3.8 |
-0.1 |
NS# |
*Baseline femoral neck BMD at least 2 SD below the mean
for young adult women
†Number evaluable for vertebral fractures: FOSAMAX, n=14 26; placebo, n=14 28
‡p < 0.001,
§p=0.035,
¶p=0.01
#Not significant. This study was not powered to detect differences at these
sites. |
Fracture Results Across Studies
In the Three-Year Study of FIT, FOSAMAX reduced the
percentage of women experiencing at least one new radiographic vertebral
fracture from 15.0% to 7.9% (47% relative risk reduction, p < 0.001); in the
Four-Year Study of FIT, the percentage was reduced from 3.8% to 2.1% (44%
relative risk reduction, p=0.001); and in the combined U.S./Multinational
studies, from 6.2% to 3.2% (48% relative risk reduction, p=0.034).
FOSAMAX reduced the percentage of women experiencing
multiple (two or more) new vertebral fractures from 4.2% to 0.6% (87% relative
risk reduction, p < 0.001) in the combined U.S./Multinational studies and from
4.9% to 0.5% (90% relative risk reduction, p < 0.001) in the Three-Year Study
of FIT. In the Four-Year Study of FIT, FOSAMAX reduced the percentage of
osteoporotic women experiencing multiple vertebral fractures from 0.6% to 0.1%
(78% relative risk reduction, p=0.035).
Thus, FOSAMAX reduced the incidence of radiographic
vertebral fractures in osteoporotic women whether or not they had a previous
radiographic vertebral fracture.
Effect On Bone Mineral Density
The bone mineral density efficacy of FOSAMAX 10 mg once
daily in postmenopausal women, 44 to 84 years of age, with osteoporosis (lumbar
spine bone mineral density [BMD] of at least 2 standard deviations below the
premenopausal mean) was demonstrated in four double-blind, placebo-controlled clinical
studies of two or three years' duration.
Figure 2 shows the mean increases in BMD of the lumbar
spine, femoral neck, and trochanter in patients receiving FOSAMAX 10 mg/day
relative to placebo-treated patients at three years for each of these studies.
Figure 2
 |
At three years significant increases in BMD, relative
both to baseline and placebo, were seen at each measurement site in each study
in patients who received FOSAMAX 10 mg/day. Total body BMD also increased
significantly in each study, suggesting that the increases in bone mass of the
spine and hip did not occur at the expense of other skeletal sites. Increases
in BMD were evident as early as three months and continued throughout the three
years of treatment. (See Figure 3 for lumbar spine results.) In the two-year
extension of these studies, treatment of 147 patients with FOSAMAX 10 mg/day
resulted in continued increases in BMD at the lumbar spine and trochanter
(absolute additional increases between years 3 and 5: lumbar spine, 0.94%;
trochanter, 0.88%). BMD at the femoral neck, forearm and total body were
maintained. FOSAMAX was similarly effective regardless of age, race, baseline
rate of bone turnover, and baseline BMD in the range studied (at least 2
standard deviations below the premenopausal mean).
Figure 3
In patients with postmenopausal osteoporosis treated with
FOSAMAX 10 mg/day for one or two years, the effects of treatment withdrawal
were assessed. Following discontinuation, there were no further increases in
bone mass and the rates of bone loss were similar to those of the placebo
groups.
Bone Histology
Bone histology in 270 postmenopausal patients with
osteoporosis treated with FOSAMAX at doses ranging from 1 to 20 mg/day for one,
two, or three years revealed normal mineralization and structure, as well as
the expected decrease in bone turnover relative to placebo. These data,
together with the normal bone histology and increased bone strength observed in
rats and baboons exposed to long-term alendronate treatment, support the
conclusion that bone formed during therapy with FOSAMAX is of normal quality.
Effect On Height
FOSAMAX, over a three- or four-year period, was
associated with statistically significant reductions in loss of height vs.
placebo in patients with and without baseline radiographic vertebral fractures.
At the end of the FIT studies, the between-treatment group differences were 3.2
mm in the Three-Year Study and 1.3 mm in the Four-Year Study.
Weekly Dosing
The therapeutic equivalence of once-weekly FOSAMAX 70 mg
(n=519) and FOSAMAX 10 mg daily (n=370) was demonstrated in a one-year,
double-blind, multicenter study of postmenopausal women with osteoporosis. In
the primary analysis of completers, the mean increases from baseline in lumbar
spine BMD at one year were 5.1% (4.8, 5.4%; 95% CI) in the 70-mg once-weekly
group (n=440) and 5.4% (5.0, 5.8%; 95% CI) in the 10-mg daily group (n=330).
The two treatment groups were also similar with regard to BMD increases at
other skeletal sites. The results of the intention-to-treat analysis were consistent
with the primary analysis of completers.
Concomitant Use With Estrogen/Hormone Replacement Therapy
(HRT)
The effects on BMD of treatment with FOSAMAX 10 mg once
daily and conjugated estrogen (0.625 mg/day) either alone or in combination
were assessed in a two-year, double-blind, placebo-controlled study of
hysterectomized postmenopausal osteoporotic women (n=425). At two years, the
increases in lumbar spine BMD from baseline were significantly greater with the
combination (8.3%) than with either estrogen or FOSAMAX alone (both 6.0%).
The effects on BMD when FOSAMAX was added to stable doses
(for at least one year) of HRT (estrogen ± progestin) were assessed in a
one-year, double-blind, placebo-controlled study in postmenopausal osteoporotic
women (n=428). The addition of FOSAMAX 10 mg once daily to HRT produced, at one
year, significantly greater increases in lumbar spine BMD (3.7%) vs. HRT alone (1.1%).
In these studies, significant increases or favorable
trends in BMD for combined therapy compared with HRT alone were seen at the
total hip, femoral neck, and trochanter. No significant effect was seen for total
body BMD.
Histomorphometric studies of transiliac biopsies in 92
subjects showed normal bone architecture. Compared to placebo there was a 98%
suppression of bone turnover (as assessed by mineralizing surface) after 18
months of combined treatment with FOSAMAX and HRT, 94% on FOSAMAX alone, and
78% on HRT alone. The long-term effects of combined FOSAMAX and HRT on fracture
occurrence and fracture healing have not been studied.
Prevention Of Osteoporosis In Postmenopausal Women
Daily Dosing
Prevention of bone loss was demonstrated in two
double-blind, placebo-controlled studies of postmenopausal women 40-60 years of
age. One thousand six hundred nine patients (FOSAMAX 5 mg/day; n=498) who were
at least six months postmenopausal were entered into a two-year study without
regard to their baseline BMD. In the other study, 447 patients (FOSAMAX 5
mg/day; n=88), who were between six months and three years postmenopause, were
treated for up to three years. In the placebo-treated patients BMD losses of
approximately 1% per year were seen at the spine, hip (femoral neck and
trochanter) and total body. In contrast, FOSAMAX 5 mg/day prevented bone loss
in the majority of patients and induced significant increases in mean bone mass
at each of these sites (see Figure 4). In addition, FOSAMAX 5 mg/day reduced
the rate of bone loss at the forearm by approximately half relative to placebo.
FOSAMAX 5 mg/day was similarly effective in this population regardless of age, time
since menopause, race and baseline rate of bone turnover.
Figure 4
Bone Histology
Bone histology was normal in the 28 patients biopsied at
the end of three years who received FOSAMAX at doses of up to 10 mg/day.
Weekly Dosing
The therapeutic equivalence of once weekly FOSAMAX 35 mg
(n=362) and FOSAMAX 5 mg daily (n=361) was demonstrated in a one-year,
double-blind, multicenter study of postmenopausal women without osteoporosis.
In the primary analysis of completers, the mean increases from baseline in
lumbar spine BMD at one year were 2.9% (2.6, 3.2%; 95% CI) in the 35-mg
once-weekly group (n=307) and 3.2% (2.9, 3.5%; 95% CI) in the 5-mg daily group
(n=298). The two treatment groups were also similar with regard to BMD
increases at other skeletal sites. The results of the intention-to-treat
analysis were consistent with the primary analysis of completers.
Treatment To Increase Bone Mass In Men with Osteoporosis
The efficacy of FOSAMAX in men with hypogonadal or
idiopathic osteoporosis was demonstrated in two clinical studies.
Daily Dosing
A two-year, double-blind, placebo-controlled, multicenter
study of FOSAMAX 10 mg once daily enrolled a total of 241 men between the ages
of 31 and 87 (mean, 63). All patients in the trial had either a BMD T-score
less than or equal to -2 at the femoral neck and less than or equal to -1 at
the lumbar spine, or a baseline osteoporotic fracture and a BMD T-score less
than or equal to -1 at the femoral neck. At two years, the mean increases
relative to placebo in BMD in men receiving FOSAMAX 10 mg/day were significant
at the following sites: lumbar spine, 5.3%; femoral neck, 2.6%; trochanter, 3.1%;
and total body, 1.6%. Treatment with FOSAMAX also reduced height loss (FOSAMAX,
-0.6 mm vs. placebo, -2.4 mm).
Weekly Dosing
A one-year, double-blind, placebo-controlled, multicenter
study of once weekly FOSAMAX 70 mg enrolled a total of 167 men between the ages
of 38 and 91 (mean, 66). Patients in the study had either a BMD T-score less
than or equal to -2 at the femoral neck and less than or equal to -1 at the
lumbar spine, or a BMD T-score less than or equal to -2 at the lumbar spine and
less than or equal to -1 at the femoral neck, or a baseline osteoporotic
fracture and a BMD T-score less than or equal to -1 at the femoral neck. At one
year, the mean increases relative to placebo in BMD in men receiving FOSAMAX 70
mg once weekly were significant at the following sites: lumbar spine, 2.8%;
femoral neck, 1.9%; trochanter, 2.0%; and total body, 1.2%. These increases in
BMD were similar to those seen at one year in the 10 mg once-daily study.
In both studies, BMD responses were similar regardless of
age (greater than or equal to 65 years vs. less than 65 years), gonadal
function (baseline testosterone less than 9 ng/dL vs. greater than or equal to 9
ng/dL), or baseline BMD (femoral neck and lumbar spine T-score less than or
equal to -2.5 vs. greater than -2.5).
Treatment Of Glucocorticoid-Induced Osteoporosis
The efficacy of FOSAMAX 5 and 10 mg once daily in men and
women receiving glucocorticoids (at least 7.5 mg/day of prednisone or
equivalent) was demonstrated in two, one-year, double-blind, randomized,
placebo-controlled, multicenter studies of virtually identical design, one
performed in the United States and the other in 15 different countries
(Multinational [which also included FOSAMAX 2.5 mg/day]). These studies
enrolled 232 and 328 patients, respectively, between the ages of 17 and 83 with
a variety of glucocorticoid-requiring diseases. Patients received supplemental
calcium and vitamin D. Â Figure 5 shows the mean increases relative to placebo
in BMD of the lumbar spine, femoral neck, and trochanter in patients receiving
FOSAMAX 5 mg/day for each study.
Figure 5
 |
After one year, significant increases relative to placebo
in BMD were seen in the combined studies at each of these sites in patients who
received FOSAMAX 5 mg/day. In the placebo-treated patients, a significant
decrease in BMD occurred at the femoral neck (-1.2%), and smaller decreases
were seen at the lumbar spine and trochanter. Total body BMD was maintained
with FOSAMAX 5 mg/day. The increases in BMD with FOSAMAX 10 mg/day were similar
to those with FOSAMAX 5 mg/day in all patients except for postmenopausal women
not receiving estrogen therapy. In these women, the increases (relative to
placebo) with FOSAMAX 10 mg/day were greater than those with FOSAMAX 5 mg/day
at the lumbar spine (4.1% vs. 1.6%) and trochanter (2.8% vs. 1.7%), but not at
other sites. FOSAMAX was effective regardless of dose or duration of
glucocorticoid use. In addition, FOSAMAX was similarly effective regardless of
age (less than 65 vs. greater than or equal to 65 years), race (Caucasian vs.
other races), gender, underlying disease, baseline BMD, baseline bone turnover,
and use with a variety of common medications.
Bone histology was normal in the 49 patients biopsied at
the end of one year who received FOSAMAX at doses of up to 10 mg/day.
Of the original 560 patients in these studies, 208
patients who remained on at least 7.5 mg/day of prednisone or equivalent
continued into a one-year double-blind extension. After two years of treatment,
spine BMD increased by 3.7% and 5.0% relative to placebo with FOSAMAX 5 and 10
mg/day, respectively. Significant increases in BMD (relative to placebo) were
also observed at the femoral neck, trochanter, and total body.
After one year, 2.3% of patients treated with FOSAMAX 5
or 10 mg/day (pooled) vs. 3.7% of those treated with placebo experienced a new
vertebral fracture (not significant). However, in the population studied for
two years, treatment with FOSAMAX (pooled dosage groups: 5 or 10 mg for two
years or 2.5 mg for one year followed by 10 mg for one year) significantly
reduced the incidence of patients with a new vertebral fracture (FOSAMAX 0.7%
vs. placebo 6.8%).
Treatment Of Paget's Disease Of Bone
The efficacy of FOSAMAX 40 mg once daily for six months
was demonstrated in two double-blind clinical studies of male and female
patients with moderate to severe Paget's disease (alkaline phosphatase at least
twice the upper limit of normal): a placebo-controlled, multinational study and
a U.S. comparative study with etidronate disodium 400 mg/day. Figure 6 shows
the mean percent changes from baseline in serum alkaline phosphatase for up to
six months of randomized treatment.
Figure 6
At six months the suppression in alkaline phosphatase in
patients treated with FOSAMAX was significantly greater than that achieved with
etidronate and contrasted with the complete lack of response in placebo-treated
patients. Response (defined as either normalization of serum alkaline phosphatase
or decrease from baseline greater than or equal to 60%) occurred in
approximately 85% of patients treated with FOSAMAX in the combined studies vs.
30% in the etidronate group and 0% in the placebo group. FOSAMAX was similarly
effective regardless of age, gender, race, prior use of other bisphosphonates,
or baseline alkaline phosphatase within the range studied (at least twice the
upper limit of normal).
Bone histology was evaluated in 33 patients with Paget's
disease treated with FOSAMAX 40 mg/day for 6 months. As in patients treated for
osteoporosis [see Clinical Studies], FOSAMAX did not impair
mineralization, and the expected decrease in the rate of bone turnover was
observed. Normal lamellar bone was produced during treatment with FOSAMAX, even
where preexisting bone was woven and disorganized. Overall, bone histology data
support the conclusion that bone formed during treatment with FOSAMAX is of
normal quality.