WARNINGS
Included as part of the PRECAUTIONS section.
PRECAUTIONS
Coronary Heart Disease Morbidity And Mortality
The effect of fenofibrate on coronary heart disease
morbidity and mortality and non-cardiovascular mortality has not been
established.
The Action to Control Cardiovascular Risk in Diabetes
Lipid (ACCORD Lipid) trial was a randomized placebo-controlled study of 5518
patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus on background statin therapy treated
with fenofibrate. The mean duration of follow-up was 4.7 years. Fenofibrate
plus statin combination therapy showed a non-significant 8% relative risk
reduction in the primary outcome of major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE),
a composite of non-fatal myocardial infarction, non-fatal stroke, and
cardiovascular disease death (hazard ratio [HR] 0.92, 95% CI 0.79-1.08)
(p=0.32) as compared to statin monotherapy. In a gender subgroup analysis, the
hazard ratio for MACE in men receiving combination therapy versus statin
monotherapy was 0.82 (95% CI 0.69-0.99), and the hazard ratio for MACE in women
receiving combination therapy versus statin monotherapy was 1.38 (95% CI 0.98-1.94)
(interaction p=0.01). The clinical significance of this subgroup finding is
unclear.
The Fenofibrate Intervention and Event Lowering in
Diabetes (FIELD) study was a 5-year randomized, placebo-controlled study of
9795 patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus treated with fenofibrate. Fenofibrate
demonstrated a non-significant 11% relative reduction in the primary outcome of
coronary heart disease events (hazard ratio [HR] 0.89, 95% CI 0.75-1.05,
p=0.16) and a significant 11% reduction in the secondary outcome of total cardiovascular
disease events (HR 0.89 [0.80-0.99], p=0.04). There was a non-significant 11%
(HR 1.11 [0.95, 1.29], p=0.18) and 19% (HR 1.19 [0.90, 1.57], p=0.22) increase
in total and coronary heart disease mortality, respectively, with fenofibrate
as compared to placebo.1
Because of chemical, pharmacological, and clinical
similarities between fenofibrate, clofibrate, and gemfibrozil, the adverse
findings in 4 large randomized, placebo-controlled clinical studies with these other
fibrate drugs may also apply to fenofibrate capsules.
In the Coronary Drug Project, a large study of post
myocardial infarction patients treated for 5 years with clofibrate, there was
no difference in mortality seen between the clofibrate group and the placebo group.
There was however, a difference in the rate of cholelithiasis and cholecystitis
requiring surgery between the two groups (3.0% vs. 1.8%).
In a study conducted by the World Health Organization
(WHO), 5000 subjects without known coronary artery disease were treated with placebo
or clofibrate for 5 years and followed for an additional one year. There was a
statistically significant, higher age-adjusted all-cause mortality in the
clofibrate group compared with the placebo group (5.70% vs. 3.96%, p= < 0.01).
Excess mortality was due to a 33% increase in non-cardiovascular causes,
including malignancy, post-cholecystectomy complications, and pancreatitis.
This appeared to confirm the higher risk of gallbladder disease seen in
clofibratetreated patients studied in the Coronary Drug Project.
The Helsinki Heart Study was a large (n=4081) study of
middle aged men without a history of coronary artery disease. Subjects received
either placebo or gemfibrozil for 5 years, with a 3.5 year open extension
afterward. Total mortality was numerically higher in the gemfibrozil
randomization group but did not achieve statistical significance (p=0.19, 95%
confidence interval for relative risk G:P=0.91- 1.64). Although cancer deaths
trended higher in the gemfibrozil group (p=0.11), cancers (excluding basal cell
carcinoma) were diagnosed with equal frequency in both study groups. Due to the
limited size of the study, the relative risk of death from any cause was not
shown to be different than that seen in the 9 year follow-up data from the WHO
study (RR=1.29).
A secondary prevention component of the Helsinki Heart
Study enrolled middle-aged men excluded from the primary prevention study
because of known or suspected coronary heart disease. Subjects received
gemfibrozil or placebo for 5 years. Although cardiac deaths trended higher in
the gemfibrozil group, this was not statistically significant (hazard ratio
2.2, 95% confidence interval: 0.94-5.05).
Skeletal Muscle
Fibrates increase the risk for myopathy and have been
associated with rhabdomyolysis. The risk for serious muscle toxicity appears to
be increased in elderly patients and in patients with diabetes, renal insufficiency,
or hypothyroidism.
Data from observational studies indicate that the risk
for rhabdomyolysis is increased when fibrates, in particular gemfibrozil, are
co-administered with an HMG-CoA reductase inhibitor (statin). The combination
should be avoided unless the benefit of further alterations in lipid levels is
likely to outweigh the increased risk of this drug combination [see CLINICAL
PHARMACOLOGY].
Myopathy should be considered in any patient with diffuse
myalgias, muscle tenderness or weakness, and/or marked elevations of creatine
phosphokinase (CPK) levels.
Patients should be advised to report promptly unexplained
muscle pain, tenderness or weakness, particularly if accompanied by malaise or
fever. Creatine phosphokinase (CPK) levels should be assessed in patients
reporting these symptoms, and fenofibrate therapy should be discontinued if markedly
elevated CPK levels occur or myopathy is diagnosed.
Cases of myopathy, including rhabdomyolysis, have been
reported with fenofibrates co-administered with colchicine, and caution should
be exercised when prescribing fenofibrate with colchicine [see DRUG
INTERACTIONS].
Liver Function
Fenofibrate at doses equivalent to 100 mg to 150 mg
fenofibrate per day has been associated with increases in serum transaminases
[AST (SGOT) or ALT (SGPT)]. In a pooled analysis of 10 placebocontrolled trials
of fenofibrate, increases to > 3 times the upper limit of normal of ALT
occurred in 5.3% of patients taking fenofibrate versus 1.1% of patients treated
with placebo. The incidence of increases in transaminases observed with
fenofibrate therapy may be dose related. When transaminase determinations were
followed either after discontinuation of treatment or during continued
treatment, a return to normal limits was usually observed.
Chronic active hepatocellular and cholestatic hepatitis
associated with fenofibrate therapy have been reported after exposures of weeks
to several years. In extremely rare cases, cirrhosis has been reported in
association with chronic active hepatitis.
Baseline and regular monitoring of liver tests, including
ALT should be performed for the duration of therapy with fenofibrate, and
therapy discontinued if enzyme levels persist above three times the normal limit.
Serum Creatinine
Elevations in serum creatinine have been reported in
patients on fenofibrate. These elevations tend to return to baseline following
discontinuation of fenofibrate. The clinical significance of these observations
is unknown. Monitor renal function in patients with renal impairment taking
fenofibrate. Renal monitoring should also be considered for patients taking
fenofibrate and are at risk for renal insufficiency, such as the elderly and
patients with diabetes.
Cholelithiasis
Fenofibrate, like clofibrate and gemfibrozil, may
increase cholesterol excretion into the bile, leading to cholelithiasis. If
cholelithiasis is suspected, gallbladder studies are indicated. Fenofibrate
therapy should be discontinued if gallstones are found.
Coumarin Anticoagulants
Caution should be exercised when fenofibrate is given in
conjunction with coumarin anticoagulants. Fenofibrate may potentiate the
anticoagulant effects of these agents resulting in prolongation of the Prothrombin
Time/International Normalized Ratio (PT/INR). To prevent bleeding
complications, frequent monitoring of PT/INR and dose adjustment of the
anticoagulant are recommended until PT/INR has stabilized [see DRUG
INTERACTIONS].
Pancreatitis
Pancreatitis has been reported in patients taking
fenofibrate, gemfibrozil, and clofibrate. This occurrence may represent a
failure of efficacy in patients with severe hypertriglyceridemia, a direct drug
effect, or a secondary phenomenon mediated through biliary tract stone or
sludge formation with obstruction of the common bile duct.
Hematologic Changes
Mild to moderate decreases in hemoglobin, hematocrit, and
white blood cell decreases have been observed in patients following initiation
of fenofibrate therapy. However, these levels stabilize during long term
administration. Thrombocytopenia and agranulocytosis have been reported in
individuals treated with fenofibrate. Periodic monitoring of red and white
blood cell counts is recommended during the first 12 months of fenofibrate
administration.
Hypersensitivity Reactions
Acute hypersensitivity reactions including severe skin
rashes such as Steven-Johnson syndrome and toxic epidermal necrolysis requiring
patient hospitalization and treatment with steroids have been reported in
individuals treated with fenofibrate. Urticaria was seen in 1.1 vs. 0% and rash
in 1.4 vs. 0.8% of fenofibrate and placebo patients respectively in controlled
trials.
Venothromboembolic Disease
In the FIELD trial, pulmonary embolus (PE) and deep vein
thrombosis (DVT) were observed at higher rates in the fenofibrate than the
placebo-treated group. Of 9,795 patients enrolled in FIELD, 4,900 in the
placebo group and 4,895 in the fenofibrate group. For DVT, there were 48 events
(1%) in the placebo group and 67 (1%) in the fenofibrate group (p = 0.074); and
for PE, there were 32 (0.7%) events in the placebo group and 53 (1%) in the
fenofibrate group (p = 0.022).
In the Coronary Drug Project, a higher proportion of the
clofibrate group experienced definite or suspected fatal or nonfatal pulmonary
embolism or thrombophlebitis than the placebo group (5.2% vs. 3.3% at 5 years;
p < 0.01).
Paradoxical Decreases In HDL Cholesterol Levels
There have been postmarketing and clinical trial reports
of severe decreases in HDL cholesterol levels (as low as 2 mg/dL) occurring in
diabetic and non-diabetic patients initiated on fibrate therapy. The decrease
in HDL-C is mirrored by a decrease in apolipoprotein A1. This decrease has been
reported to occur within 2 weeks to years after initiation of fibrate therapy.
The HDL-C levels remain depressed until fibrate therapy has been withdrawn; the
response to withdrawal of fibrate therapy is rapid and sustained. The clinical
significance of this decrease in HDL-C is unknown. It is recommended that HDL-C
levels be checked within the first few months after initiation of fibrate
therapy. If a severely depressed HDL-C level is detected, fibrate therapy
should be withdrawn, and the HDL-C level monitored until it has returned to
baseline, and fibrate therapy should not be re-initiated.
Nonclinical Toxicology
Carcinogenesis, Mutagenesis, Impairment Of Fertility
Carcinogenesis
Two dietary carcinogenicity studies have been conducted
in rats with fenofibrate. In the first 24-month study, Wistar rats were dosed
with fenofibrate at 10, 45 and 200 mg/kg/day, approximately 0.3, 1, and 6 times
the maximum recommended human dose (MRHD), based on body surface are
comparisons (mg/m²). At a dose of 200 mg/kg/day (at 6 times MRHD), the
incidence of liver carcinoma was significantly increased in both sexes. A
statistically significant increase in pancreatic carcinomas was observed in
males at 1 and 6 times the MRHD; an increase in pancreatic adenomas and benign
testicular interstitial cell tumors was observed in males at 6 times the MRHD.
In a second 24- month study in a different strain of rats (Sprague-Dawley),
doses of 10 and 60 mg/kg/day (0.3 and 2 times the MRHD) produced significant
increases in the incidence of pancreatic acinar adenomas in both sexes and
increases in testicular interstitial cell tumors in males at 2 times the MRHD.
A 117-week carcinogenicity study was conducted in rats
comparing three drugs: fenofibrate 10 and 60 mg/kg/day (0.3 and 2 times the
MRHD), clofibrate (400 mg/kg; 2 times the human dose), and gemfibrozil (250
mg/kg; 2 times the human dose, based on mg/m² surface area). Fenofibrate
increased pancreatic acinar adenomas in both sexes. Clofibrate increased
hepatocellular carcinomas in males and hepatic neoplastic nodules in females.
Gemfibrozil increased hepatic neoplastic nodules in males and females, while
all three drugs increased testicular interstitial cell tumors in males.
In a 21-month study in CF-1 mice, fenofibrate 10, 45 and
200 mg/kg/day (approximately 0.2, 1, and 3 times the MRHD on the basis of mg/m²
surface area) significantly increased the liver carcinomas in both sexes at 3
times the MRHD. In a second 18 month study at 10, 60 and 200 mg/kg/day,
fenofibrate significantly increased the liver carcinomas in male mice and liver
adenomas in female mice at 3 times the MRHD.
Electron microscopy studies have demonstrated peroxisomal
proliferation following fenofibrate administration to the rat. An adequate
study to test for peroxisome proliferation in humans has not been done, but
changes in peroxisome morphology and numbers have been observed in humans after
treatment with other members of the fibrate class when liver biopsies were
compared before and after treatment in the same individual.
Mutagenesis
Fenofibrate has been demonstrated to be devoid of
mutagenic potential in the following tests: Ames, mouse lymphoma, chromosomal
aberration and unscheduled DNA synthesis in primary rat hepatocytes.
Impairment Of Fertility
In fertility studies rats were given oral dietary doses
of fenofibrate, males received 61 days prior to mating and females 15 days
prior to mating through weaning which resulted in no adverse effect on
fertility at doses up to 300 mg/kg/day (approximately 10 times the MRHD, based on
mg/m² surface area comparisons).
Use In Specific Populations
Pregnancy
Pregnancy Category C
Safety in pregnant women has not been established. There
are no adequate and well controlled studies of fenofibrate in pregnant women.
Fenofibrate should be used during pregnancy only if the potential benefit
justifies the potential risk to the fetus.
In female rats given oral dietary doses of 15, 75, and
300 mg/kg/day of fenofibrate from 15 days prior to mating through weaning,
maternal toxicity was observed at 0.3 times the maximum recommended human dose
(MRHD), based on body surface area comparisons; mg/m².
In pregnant rats given oral dietary doses of 14, 127, and
361 mg/kg/day from gestation day 6-15 during the period of organogenesis,
adverse developmental findings were not observed at 14 mg/kg/day (less than 1
times the MRHD, based on body surface area comparisons; mg/m²). At higher
multiples of human doses evidence of maternal toxicity was observed.
In pregnant rabbits given oral gavage doses of 15, 150,
and 300 mg/kg/day from gestation day 6-18 during the period of organogenesis
and allowed to deliver, aborted litters were observed at 150 mg/kg/day (10
times the MRHD, based on body surface area comparisons; mg/m²). No
developmental findings were observed at 15 mg/kg/day (at less than 1 times the
MRHD, based on body surface area comparisons; mg/m²).
In pregnant rats given oral dietary doses of 15, 75, and
300 mg/kg/day from gestation day 15 through lactation day 21 (weaning),
maternal toxicity was observed at less than 1 times the MRHD, based on body
surface area comparisons; mg/m².
Nursing Mothers
Fenofibrate should not be used in nursing mothers. A
decision should be made whether to discontinue nursing or to discontinue the
drug, taking into account the importance of the drug to the mother.
Pediatric Use
Safety and effectiveness have not been established in
pediatric patients.
Geriatric Use
Fenofibrate is substantially excreted by the kidney, and
the risk of adverse reactions to this drug may be greater in patients with
impaired renal function. Since elderly patients have a higher incidence of
renal impairment, the dose selection for the elderly should be made on the
basis of renal function [see DOSAGE AND ADMINISTRATION and CLINICAL
PHARMACOLOGY]. Fenofibrate exposure is not influenced by age. Elderly
patients with normal renal function should require no dose modifications.
Consider monitoring renal function in elderly patients taking fenofibrate.
Renal Impairment
The use of fenofibrate should be avoided in patients who
have severe renal impairment [see CONTRAINDICATIONS]. Dose reduction is
required in patients with mild to moderate renal impairment [see DOSAGE AND
ADMINISTRATION and CLINICAL PHARMACOLOGY]. Monitoring renal function
in patients with renal impairment is recommended.
Hepatic Impairment
The use of fenofibrate has not been evaluated in patients
with hepatic impairment [see CONTRAINDICATIONS and CLINICAL
PHARMACOLOGY].