CLINICAL PHARMACOLOGY
Clinical Pharmacology in Adults
GI Effects
Famotidine is a competitive inhibitor of histamine H2–receptors.
The primary clinically important pharmacologic activity of famotidine is inhibition
of gastric secretion. Both the acid concentration and volume of gastric secretion
are suppressed by famotidine, while changes in pepsin secretion are proportional
to volume output.
In normal volunteers and hypersecretors, famotidine inhibited basal and nocturnal
gastric secretion, as well as secretion stimulated by food and pentagastrin.
After oral administration, the onset of the antisecretory effect occurred within
one hour; the maximum effect was dose-dependent, occurring within one to three
hours. Duration of inhibition of secretion by doses of 20 and 40 mg was 10 to
12 hours.
After intravenous administration, the maximum effect was achieved within 30
minutes. Single intravenous doses of 10 and 20 mg inhibited nocturnal secretion
for a period of 10 to 12 hours. The 20 mg dose was associated with the longest
duration of action in most subjects.
Single evening oral doses of 20 and 40 mg inhibited basal and nocturnal acid
secretion in all subjects; mean nocturnal gastric acid secretion was inhibited
by 86% and 94%, respectively, for a period of at least 10 hours. The same doses
given in the morning suppressed food-stimulated acid secretion in all subjects.
The mean suppression was 76% and 84%, respectively, 3 to 5 hours after administration,
and 25% and 30%, respectively, 8 to 10 hours after administration. In some subjects
who received the 20 mg dose, however, the antisecretory effect was dissipated
within 6 to 8 hours. There was no cumulative effect with repeated doses. The
nocturnal intragastric pH was raised by evening doses of 20 and 40 mg of famotidine
to mean values of 5.0 and 6.4, respectively. When famotidine was given after
breakfast, the basal daytime interdigestive pH at 3 and 8 hours after 20 or
40 mg of famotidine was raised to about 5.
Famotidine had little or no effect on fasting or postprandial serum gastrin
levels. Gastric emptying and exocrine pancreatic function were not affected
by famotidine.
Other Effects
Systemic effects of famotidine in the CNS, cardiovascular, respiratory or endocrine
systems were not noted in clinical pharmacology studies. Also, no antiandrogenic
effects were noted. (See ADVERSE REACTIONS.) Serum hormone levels, including
prolactin, cortisol, thyroxine (T4), and testosterone, were not altered
after treatment with famotidine.
Pharmacokinetics
Orally administered famotidine is incompletely absorbed and its bioavailability
is 40 to 45%. Famotidine undergoes minimal first-pass metabolism. After oral
doses, peak plasma levels occur in 1to 3 hours. Plasma levels after multiple
doses are similar to those after single doses. Fifteen to 20% of famotidine
in plasma is protein bound. Famotidine has an elimination half-life of 2.5 to
3.5 hours. Famotidine is eliminated by renal (65 to 70%) and metabolic (30 to
35%) routes. Renal clearance is 250 to 450 mL/min, indicating some tubular excretion.
Twenty-five to 30% of an oral dose and 65 to 70% of an intravenous dose are
recovered in the urine as unchanged compound. The only metabolite identified
in man is the S-oxide.
There is a close relationship between crea-tinine clearance values and the
elimination half-life of famotidine. In patients with severe renal insufficiency,
i.e., creatinine clearance less than 10 mL/min, the elimination half-life offamotidine
may exceed 20 hours and adjustment ofdose or dosing intervals in moderate and
severe renal insufficiency may be necessary (see PRECAUTIONS,
DOSAGE AND ADMINISTRATION).
In elderly patients, there are no clinically significant age-related changes
in the pharma-cokinetics of famotidine. However, in elderly patients with decreased
renal function, the clearance of the drug may be decreased (see PRECAUTIONS,
Geriatric Use).
Clinical Studies
The majority of clinical study experience involved oral administration of famotidine
tablets, and is provided herein for reference.
Duodenal Ulcer
In a U.S. multicenter, double-blind study in outpatients with endoscopically
confirmed duodenal ulcer, orally administered famotidine was compared to placebo.
As shown in Table 1, 70% of patients treated with famotidine 40 mg h.s. were
healed by week 4.
Table 1 : Outpatients with Endoscopically Confirmed Healed
Duodenal Ulcers
|
Famotidine
40 mg h.s.
(N=89) |
Famotidine
20 mg b.i.d.
(N=84) |
Placebo h.s.
(N=97) |
Week 2 |
**32% |
**38% |
17% |
Week 4 |
**70% |
**67% |
31% |
**Statistically significantly different
than placebo (p < 0.001) |
Patients not healed by week 4 were continued in the study. By week 8, 83% of
patients treated with famotidine had healed versus 45% of patients treated with
placebo. The incidence of ulcer healing with famotidine was significantly higher
than with placebo at each time point based on proportion of endoscopically confirmed
healed ulcers.
In this study, time to relief of daytime and nocturnal pain was significantly
shorter for patients receiving famotidine than for patients receiving placebo;
patients receiving famotidine also took less antacid than the patients receiving
placebo.
Long-Term Maintenance
Treatment of Duodenal Ulcers
Famotidine, 20 mg p.o. h.s. was compared to placebo h.s. as maintenance therapy
in two double-blind, multicenter studies of patients with endoscopically confirmed
healed duodenal ulcers. In the U.S. study the observed ulcer incidence within
12 months in patients treated with placebo was 2.4 times greater than in the
patients treated with famotidine. The 89 patients treated with famotidine had
a cumulative observed ulcer incidence of 23.4% compared to an observed ulcer
incidence of 56.6% in the 89 patients receiving placebo (p < 0.01). These results
were confirmed in an international study where the cumulative observed ulcer
incidence within 12 months in the 307 patients treated with famotidine was 35.7%,
compared to an incidence of 75.5% in the 325 patients treated with placebo (p < 0.01).
Gastric Ulcer
In both a U.S. and an international multicenter, double-blind study in patients
with endoscop-ically confirmed active benign gastric ulcer, orally administered
famo-tidine, 40 mg h.s., was compared to placebo h.s. Antacids were permitted
during the studies, but consumption was not significantly different between
the famotidine and placebo groups. As shown in Table 2, the incidence of ulcer
healing (dropouts counted as unhealed) with famotidine was statistically significantly
better than placebo at weeks 6 and 8 in the U.S. study, and at weeks 4, 6 and
8 in the international study, based on the number of ulcers that healed, confirmed
by endoscopy.
Table 2 : Patients with Endoscopically Confirmed Healed Gastric
Ulcers
|
U.S. Study |
International Study |
Famotidine
40 mg h.s.
(N=74) |
Placebo h.s.
(N=75) |
Famotidine
40 mg h.s.
(N=149) |
Placebo h.s.
(N=145) |
Week 4 |
45% |
39% |
†47% |
31% |
Week 6 |
†66% |
44% |
†65% |
46% |
Week 8 |
***78% |
64% |
†80% |
54% |
***,† Statistically significantly
better than placebo (p ≤ 0.05, p ≤ 0.01 respectively) |
Time to complete relief of daytime and nighttime pain was statistically significantly
shorter for patients receiving famotidine than for patients receiving placebo;
however, in neither study was there a statistically significant difference in
the proportion of patients whose pain was relieved by the end of the study (week
8).
Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease (GERD) Orally administered famotidine was compared
to placebo in a U.S. study that enrolled patients with symptoms of GERD and
without endo-scopic evidence of erosion or ulceration of the esophagus. Famotidine
20 mg b.i.d. was statistically significantly superior to 40 mg h.s. and to placebo
in providing a successful symptomatic outcome, defined as moderate or excellent
improvement of symptoms (Table 3).
Table 3 : % Successful Symptomatic Outcome
|
Famotidine
20 mg b.i.d.
(N=154) |
Famotidine
40 mg h.s.
(N=149) |
Placebo
(N=73) |
Week 6 |
82†† |
69 |
62 |
††p ≤ 0.01vs Placebo |
By two weeks of treatment, symptomatic success was observed in a greater percentage
of patients taking famotidine 20 mg b.i.d. compared to placebo (p ≤ 0.01).
Symptomatic improvement and healing of endoscopically verified erosion and
ulceration were studied in two additional trials. Healing was defined as complete
resolution of all erosions or ulcerations visible with endoscopy. The U.S. study
comparing famotidine 40 mg p.o. b.i.d. to placebo and famotidine 20 mg p.o.
b.i.d., showed a significantly greater percentage of healing for famotidine
40 mg b.i.d. at weeks 6 and 12 (Table 4).
Table 4 : % Endoscopic Healing – U.S. Study
|
Famotidine
40 mg b.i.d.
(N=127) |
Famotidine
20 mg b.i.d.
(N=125) |
Placebo
(N=66) |
Week 6 |
48†††, ‡,‡ |
32 |
18 |
Week 12 |
69†††, ‡ |
54††† |
29 |
†††p ≤ 0.01vs Placebo
‡p ≤ 0.05 vs Famotidine 20 mg b.i.d.
‡,‡p ≤ 0.01vs Famotidine 20 mg b.i.d. |
As compared to placebo, patients who received famotidine had faster relief
of daytime and nighttime heartburn and a greater percentage of patients experienced
complete relief of nighttime heartburn. These differences were statistically
significant.
In the international study, when famotidine 40 mg p.o. b.i.d. was compared
to ranitidine 150 mg p.o. b.i.d., a statistically significantly greater percentage
of healing was observed with famotidine 40 mg b.i.d. at week 12 (Table 5). There
was, however, no significant difference among treatments in symptom relief.
Table 5 % Endoscopic Healing - International Study
|
Famotidine
40 mg b.i.d.
(N=175) |
Famotidine
20 mg b.i.d.
(N=93) |
Ranitidine
150 mg b.i.d.
(N=172) |
Week 6 |
48 |
52 |
42 |
Week 12 |
71‡,‡,‡ |
68 |
60 |
‡,‡,‡p ≤ 0.05 vs Ranitidine 150 mg
b.i.d. |
Pathological Hypersecretory Conditions (e.g., Zollinger-Ellison Syndrome, Multiple
Endocrine Adenomas)
In studies of patients with pathological hyper-secretory conditions such as
Zollinger-Ellison Syndrome with or without multiple endocrine adenomas, famotidine
significantly inhibited gastric acid secretion and controlled associated symptoms.
Orally administered doses from 20 to 160 mg q 6 h maintained basal acid secretion
below 10 mEq/hr; initial doses were titrated to the individual patient need
and subsequent adjustments were necessary with time in some patients. Famotidine
was well tolerated at these high dose levels for prolonged periods (greater
than 12 months) in eight patients, and there were no cases reported of gynecomastia,
increased prolactin levels, or impotence which were considered to be due to
the drug.
Clinical Pharmacology in Pediatric Patients
Pharmacokinetics
Table 6 presents pharmacokinetic data from published studies of small numbers
of pediatric patients given famotidine intravenously. Areas under the curve
(AUCs) are normalized to a dose of 0.5 mg/kg IV for pediatric patients and compared
with an extrapolated 40 mg intravenous dose in adults (extrapolation based on
results obtained with a 20 mg IV adult dose).
Table 6 : Pharmacokinetic Parametersa of Intravenous
Famotidine
Age
(N=number
of patients) |
Area unde rthe
Curve (AUC)
(ng-hr/mL) |
Total
Clearance (Cl)
(L/hr/kg) |
1-11 yrs (N=20) |
1089 ± 834 |
0.54 ± 0.34 |
11-15 yrs (N=6) |
1140 ± 320 |
0.48 ± 0.14 |
Adult (N=16) |
1726b |
0.39 ± 0.14 |
Volume of Distribution (Vd) (L/kg) |
Elimination Half-life (T ½) (hours) |
2.07± 1.49 |
3.38 ± 2.60 |
1.5± 0.4 |
2.3 ± 0.4 |
1.3± 0.2 |
2.83 ± 0.99 |
aValues are presented as means ± SD
unless indicated otherwise.
bMean value only. |
Values of pharmacokinetic parameters for pediatric patients, ages 1-15 years,
are comparable to those obtained for adults.
Bioavailability studies of 8 pediatric patients (11-15 years of age) showed
a mean oral bioavailability of 0.5 compared to adult values of 0.42 to 0.49.
Oral doses of 0.5 mg/kg achieved an AUC of 580 ± 60 ng-hr/mL in pediatric
patients 11-15 years of age compared to 482 ± 181ng-hr/mL in adults treated
with 40 mg orally.
Pharmacodynamics
Pharmacodynamics of famotidine were evaluated in 5 pediatric patients 2-13
years of age using the sigmoid Emax model. These data suggest that the relationship
between serum concentration of famotidine and gastric acid suppression is similar
to that observed in one study of adults (Table 7).
Table7 : Pharmacodynamics of famotidine using the sigmoid
Emax model
|
EC50 (ng/mL)* |
Pediatric Patients |
26 ±13 |
Data from one study |
|
a) healthy adult subjects |
26.5 ± 10.3 |
b) adult patients with upper GI bleeding |
18.7 ± 10.8 |
*Serum concentration of famotidine associated
with 50% maximum gastric acid reduction. Values are presented as means
±SD. |
Four published studies (Table 8) examined the effect of famotidine on gastric
pH and duration of acid suppression in pediatric patients. While each study
had a different design, acid suppression data over time are summarized as follows:
Table8
Dosage |
Route |
Effecta |
Number of Patients |
0.3 mg/kg, single dose |
IV |
gastric pH > 3.5 for 8.7 ± 4.7bhours |
6 |
0.4-0.8 mg/kg |
IV |
gastric pH > 4 for 6-9 hours |
18 |
0.5 mg/kg, single dose |
IV |
a > 2 pH unit increase above baseline in gastric pH for > 8 hours
|
9 |
0.5 mg/kg b.i.d. |
IV |
gastric pH > 5 for 13.5 ± 1.8bhours |
4 |
0.5 mg/kg b.i.d. |
oral |
gastric pH > 5 for 5.0 ± 1.1bhours |
4 |
aValues reported in published
literature.
bMeans ±SD. |