Clinical Pharmacology for Eylea HD
Mechanism Of Action
Vascular endothelial growth factor-A (VEGF-A) and placental growth factor (PlGF) are members of the VEGF family of angiogenic factors that can act as mitogenic, chemotactic, and vascular permeability factors for endothelial cells. VEGF acts via two receptor tyrosine kinases, VEGFR-1 and VEGFR-2, present on the surface of endothelial cells. PlGF binds only to VEGFR-1, which is also present on the surface of leucocytes. Activation of these receptors by VEGF-A can result in neovascularization and vascular permeability.
Aflibercept acts as a soluble decoy receptor that binds VEGF-A and PlGF, and thereby can inhibit the binding and activation of these cognate VEGF receptors.
Pharmacodynamics
Increased retinal thickness, assessed by optical coherence tomography (OCT), is associated with nAMD and DME. Reductions in central subfield thickness (CST) were observed across all treatment arms throughout the two Phase 3 studies in nAMD and DME.
Pharmacokinetics
EYLEA HD is administered intravitreally to exert local effects in the eye. In patients with wet AMD, or DME, following intravitreal administration of EYLEA HD, a fraction of the administered dose is expected to bind with endogenous VEGF in the eye to form an inactive aflibercept: VEGF complex. Once absorbed into the systemic circulation, aflibercept presents in the plasma as free aflibercept (unbound to VEGF) and a more predominant stable inactive form with circulating endogenous VEGF (i.e., aflibercept: VEGF complex).
Absorption/Distribution
As no relevant differences in pharmacokinetics between the nAMD and DME populations were observed based on a population pharmacokinetic analysis of the data, population pharmacokinetic estimated parameters are presented for the two populations combined. Following unilateral intravitreal administration of 8 mg aflibercept, the mean (SD) Cmax of free aflibercept in plasma was 0.30 (0.27) mg/L, and the median time to maximal concentration in plasma was 2.9 days. The accumulation of free aflibercept in plasma following three initial monthly intravitreal doses was minimal (mean accumulation ratio 1.2); subsequently, no further accumulation was observed.
The volume of distribution of free aflibercept following intravenous (I.V.) administration of aflibercept is approximately 7 L.
Metabolism/Elimination
Aflibercept is a therapeutic protein and no drug metabolism studies have been conducted. Aflibercept is expected to undergo elimination through both target-mediated disposition via binding to free endogenous VEGF and metabolism via proteolysis. The median time to reach non-quantifiable concentrations of free aflibercept in plasma for 8 mg administered intravitreally was 3.5 weeks.
Specific Populations
Renal And Hepatic Impairment
Population pharmacokinetic analysis revealed that systemic exposures to aflibercept in patients with mild to severe renal impairment (eGFR 15 to < 90 mL/min, estimated using the Chronic Kidney Disease Epidemiology Collaboration (CKD-EPI) equation for eGFR were similar to those with normal renal function. Mild hepatic impairment had no influence on systemic exposures to aflibercept compared to patients with normal hepatic function. No data for patients with moderate and severe hepatic impairment are available. No dose adjustment based on renal or hepatic impairment status is needed.
Other
No dosage adjustment is required for any of the populations that have been studied (e.g., age and race).
Immunogenicity
The observed incidence of anti-drug antibodies is highly dependent on the sensitivity and specificity of the assay. Differences in assay methods preclude meaningful comparisons of theincidence of anti-drug antibodies in the studies described below with the incidence of anti-drug antibodies for other products.
During the 48-week treatment with aflibercept administrated IVT, the incidence of anti-aflibercept antibody formation in the 8 mg treatment groups was 2.7% (25/937 participants with nAMD [PULSAR] or DME [PHOTON]).
Animal Toxicology And/Or Pharmacology
Erosions and ulcerations of the respiratory epithelium in nasal turbinates in monkeys treated with aflibercept intravitreally were observed at intravitreal doses of 2, 4 or 7 mg per eye. At the NOAEL of 0.5 mg per eye in monkeys, the systemic exposure (AUC) for free aflibercept was approximately 3 times higher than the population pharmacokinetic estimated exposure observed in humans after an intravitreal dose of 8 mg. Similar effects were not seen in clinical studies [see Clinical Studies].
Clinical Studies
Neovascular (Wet) Age-Related Macular Degeneration (nAMD)
The safety and efficacy of EYLEA HD were assessed in a randomized, multi-center, doublemasked, active-controlled study (PULSAR) in treatment-naïve patients with nAMD. A total of 1009 patients were treated and analyzed for efficacy (673 with EYLEA HD). Patients were randomly assigned in a 1:1:1 ratio to 1 of 3 treatment groups: 1) EYLEA HD administered every 12 weeks following 3 initial monthly doses (HDq12); 2) EYLEA HD administered every 16 weeks following 3 initial monthly doses (HDq16); 3) EYLEA 2 mg administered every 8 weeks (2q8) following 3 initial monthly doses. In the EYLEA HD groups, patients could be treated as frequently as every 8 weeks based on protocol-defined visual and anatomic criteria, starting at week 16. Patients ranged from 50 to 96 years of age with a mean of 74.5 years. At baseline, mean visual acuity was approximately 60 letters (range: 24 to 78 letters).
The primary efficacy endpoint was the change from baseline in BCVA at week 48 as measured by the Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study (ETDRS) letter score.
Both HDq12 and HDq16 treatments were shown to be non-inferior and clinically equivalent to 2q8 treatment with respect to the change in BCVA score at week 48 using the pre-specified non-inferiority margin of 4 letters. In patients completing week 48, the mean number of injections administered were 5.2 in the HDq16 group (n=312), 6.1 in the HDq12 group (n=316) and 6.9 in the EYLEA q8 group (n=309). Detailed results from the analysis of the PULSAR study are shown in Table 2 and Figure 8 below.
Efficacy results in all subgroups (e.g., age, gender, geographic region, ethnicity, race, baseline BCVA and lesion type) were consistent with those in the overall population.
Table 2: Efficacy Outcomes (Full Analysis Set) in PULSAR Study
| Efficacy Outcomes |
EYLEA HDq12 |
EYLEA HDq16 |
EYLEA 2q8 |
| Full Analysis Seta |
N=335 |
N=338 |
N=336 |
| Mean change in BCVA as measured by ETDRS letter score from baseline (SD) at week 48b |
6.7
(12.6) |
6.2
(11.7) |
7.6
(12.2) |
| LS mean (SE) change from baseline c |
6.1
(0.8) |
5.9
(0.7) |
7.0
(0.7) |
Difference in LS mean
(95% CI)c |
-1.0
(-2.9, 0.9) |
-1.1
(-3.0, 0.7) |
|
BCVA = Best Corrected Visual Acuity; ETDRS = Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study; SD = Standard Deviation; LS = Least Square; SE = Standard Error; CI = Confidence Interval; MMRM = Mixed Model for Repeated Measurements
a.Full Analysis Set (FAS) includes all randomized patients who received at least 1 dose of study medication
b.Observed values at week 48: n=299 for HDq12; n=289 for HDq16; n=285 for 2q8
c.Estimate based on the MMRM model, was computed for the differences of HDq12 minus 2q8 and HDq16 minus 2q8, respectively, with two-sided 95% CIs |
Figure 8: Mean Change from Baseline in BCVA as measured by ETDRS Letter Score by Visits through Week 48 (Observed Cases)
Diabetic Macular Edema (DME)
The safety and efficacy of EYLEA HD was assessed in a randomized, multi-center, doublemasked, active-controlled study (PHOTON) in patients with DME involving the center of the macula. A total of 658 patients were treated and analyzed for efficacy (491 with EYLEA HD). Patients were randomly assigned in a 2:1:1 ratio to 1 of 3 treatment groups: 1) EYLEA HD administered every 12 weeks following 3 initial monthly doses (HDq12); 2) EYLEA HD administered every 16 weeks following 3 initial monthly doses (HDq16); 3) EYLEA 2 mg administered every 8 weeks (2q8) following 5 initial monthly doses. In the EYLEA HD groups, patients could be treated as frequently as every 8 weeks based on protocol-defined visual and anatomic criteria, starting at week 16. Patient ages ranged from 24 to 90 years with a mean of 62.3 years. A total of 44% of patients were previously treated for DME. At baseline, the overall mean visual acuity was 63 letters (range: 24 to 79 letters).
The primary efficacy endpoint was the change from baseline in BCVA at week 48 as measured by the ETDRS letter score. Both HDq12 and HDq16 treatments were shown to be non-inferior and clinically equivalent to 2q8 treatment with respect to the change in BCVA score at week 48 using the pre-specified non-inferiority margin of 4 letters. In patients completing week 48, the mean number of injections administered were 5.0 in the HDq16 group (n=155), 6.0 in the HDq12 group (n=298) and 7.9 in the EYLEA q8 group (n=156). Detailed results from the analysis of the PHOTON study are shown in Table 3 and Figure 9 below.
Table 3: Efficacy Outcomes (Full Analysis Set) in PHOTON Study
| Efficacy Outcomes |
EYLEA HDq12 |
EYLEA HDq16 |
EYLEA 2q8 |
| Full Analysis Seta |
N=328 |
N=163 |
N=167 |
| Mean change in BCVA as measured by ETDRS letter score from baseline (SD) at week 48b |
8.8 (9.0) |
7.9 (8.4) |
9.2 (9.0) |
| LS mean (SE) change from baselinec |
8.1 (0.6) |
7.2 (0.7) |
8.7 (0.7) |
Difference in LS mean
(95% CI)c |
-0.6
(-2.3, 1.1) |
-1.4
(-3.3, 0.4) |
|
BCVA = Best Corrected Visual Acuity; ETDRS = Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study; SD = Standard Deviation; LS = Least Square; SE = Standard Error; CI = Confidence Interval; MMRM = Mixed Model for Repeated Measurements.
a.FAS includes all randomized patients who received at least 1 dose of study medication
b.Observed values at week 48: n=277 for HDq12; n=149 for HDq16; n=150 for 2q8
c.Estimate based on the MMRM model, was computed for the differences of HDq12 minus 2q8 and HDq16 minus 2q8, respectively with two-sided 95% CIs |
Efficacy results in all subgroups (e.g., age, gender, geographic region, ethnicity, race, baseline, BCVA, baseline CRT and prior DME treatment) were consistent with those in the overall population.
Figure 9: Mean Change from Baseline in BCVA as measured by ETDRS Letter Score by Visits through Week 48 (Observed Cases)
Diabetic Retinopathy (DR)
Efficacy and safety data of EYLEA HD in diabetic retinopathy (DR) are derived from the PHOTON study.
In the PHOTON study, a key efficacy outcome was the change in the Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study (ETDRS) Diabetic Retinopathy Severity Scale (ETDRS-DRSS). Each EYLEA HD group was compared to the 2q8 group using a NI margin of 10%.
The ETDRS-DRSS score was assessed at baseline and approximately every 3 months thereafter for the duration of the study [see Diabetic Macular Edema (DME)]. Baseline ETDRS-DRSS scores were generally balanced across treatment groups.
Results from the analysis of ETDRS-DRSS scores at week 48 in the PHOTON study are shown in Table 4 below:
Table 4: Proportion of Patients Who Achieved a ≥2-Step Improvement from Baseline in the ETDRS-DRSS Score at Week 48 (Full Analysis Set) in PHOTON
| Efficacy Outcomes |
EYLEA HDq12 |
EYLEA HDq16 |
EYLEA 2q8 |
| Full Analysis Seta |
N=328 |
N=163 |
N=167 |
| Proportion of patients with a ≥2-step improvement on ETDRS-DRSS from Baseline (%)b |
29% |
20% |
27% |
Differencec(%)
(95% CI) |
2%
(-6.6, 10.6) |
-8%
(-16.9, 1.8) |
|
Missing or non-gradable post-baseline ETDRS-DRSS values were imputed using the last gradable ETDRS-DRSS values. Patients were considered as non-responders if all post-baseline measurements were missing or non-gradable. Missing or ungradable baseline was not included in the denominator.
a.FAS includes all randomized patients who received at least 1 dose of study medication
b.Last observation carried forward
c.Difference with confidence interval (CI) was calculated using Mantel-Haenszel weighting scheme |
The EYLEA HDq16 did not meet the non-inferiority criteria for the proportion of patients with a ≥2-step improvement on ETDRS-DRSS and is not considered clinically equivalent to EYLEA administered every 8 weeks.
Results of the subgroups (e.g., age, gender, race, ethnicity, baseline BCVA and prior DME treatment) on the proportion of patients who achieved a ≥2-step improvement on the ETDRSDRSS from baseline to week 48 were, in general, consistent with those in the overall population.
The safety and efficacy of Eylea HD was assessed in a randomized, multi-center, double- masked, active-controlled study (QUASAR) in patients with treatment naïve macular edema secondary to RVO. A total of 892 patients (425 with CRVO/HRVO and 467 with BRVO) were treated and analyzed for efficacy (591 with Eylea HD). Patients were randomly assigned in a 1:1:1 ratio to 1 of 3 treatment groups: 1) Eylea HD administered every 8 weeks, following 3 initial monthly doses (HDq8/3); 2) Eylea HD administered every 8 weeks, following 5 initial monthly doses (HDq8/5); 3) Eylea 2 mg administered every 4 weeks (2q4). Dosing intervals could be shortened or extended by 4-week increments based on protocol-defined visual and anatomic criteria. Intervals could be shortened beginning at week 16 for the HDq8/3 group, at week 24 for the HDq8/5 group and, if previously extended, at week 40 for the 2q4 group; intervals could be extended beginning at week 32 for the HDq8/3 and 2q4 groups and at week 40 for the HDq8/5 group. Patient ages ranged from 23 to 95 years with a mean of 65.9 years. At baseline, mean visual acuity was approximately 55 letters (range: 18 to 74 letters).
The primary efficacy endpoint was the change from baseline in BCVA at week 36 as measured by the Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study (ETDRS) letter score.
Both Eylea HD groups were shown to be non-inferior and clinically equivalent to Eylea with respect to the change in BCVA score at week 36 using the pre-specified non-inferiority margin of 4 letters. 9.1% of total Eylea HD treated patients met protocol-defined criteria to be treated every 4 weeks. Detailed results from the analysis of the QUASAR study are shown in Table 6 and Figure 10 below.
Efficacy results in all subgroups (e.g., age, gender, geographic region, ethnicity, race, baseline BCVA and RVO subtype) were generally consistent with those in the overall population.
Table 6: Efficacy Outcomes (Full Analysis Set) in QUASAR Study
|
Efficacy Outcomes |
Eylea HDq8/3 |
Eylea HDq8/5 |
Eylea 2q4 |
|
Full Analysis Seta |
N=293 |
N=298 |
N=301 |
|
Mean change in BCVA as measured by ETDRS letter score from baseline (SD) at week 36b |
17.0 (11.8) |
19.1 (11.2) |
17.8 (13.1) |
|
LS mean (SE) change from baselinec |
17.0 (0.7) |
17.9 (0.6) |
17.1 (0.7) |
|
Difference in LS mean (95% CI)c |
-0.1 (-2.0, 1.9) |
0.8 (-1.1, 2.7) |
|
BCVA = Best Corrected Visual Acuity; ETDRS = Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study; SD = Standard Deviation; LS = Least Square; SE = Standard Error; CI = Confidence Interval; MMRM = Mixed Model for Repeated Measurements
a. Full Analysis Set (FAS) includes all randomized patients who received at least 1 dose of study medication
b. Observed values at week 36: n=260 for HDq8/3; n=248 for HDq8/5; n=264 for 2q4
c. Estimate based on the MMRM model, was computed for the differences of HDq8/3 minus 2q4 and HDq8/5 minus 2q4, respectively, with two-sided 95% CIs
Figure 10: Mean Change from Baseline in BCVA as measured by ETDRS Letter Score by Visits through Week 36 (Observed Cases)