CLINICAL PHARMACOLOGY
Mechanism of Action
The primary activity of insulin is regulation of glucose metabolism. Insulin
lowers blood glucose concentrations by stimulating peripheral glucose uptake
by skeletal muscle and fat, and by inhibiting hepatic glucose production. Insulin
inhibits lipolysis in the adipocyte, inhibits proteolysis, and enhances protein
synthesis.
Pharmacokinetics
Absorption
EXUBERA (insulin human [rdna origin]) delivers insulin by oral inhalation. The insulin is absorbed as quickly
as subcutaneously administered rapid-acting insulin analogs and more quickly
than subcutaneously administered regular human insulin in healthy subjects and
in patients with type 1 or type 2 diabetes (see Figure 1).
Figure 1: Mean Changes in Free Insulin Serum Concentrations
(µU/mL) in Patients with Type 2 Diabetes Following Administration of Single
Doses of Inhaled Insulin from EXUBERA (insulin human [rdna origin]) (6 mg) and Subcutaneous Regular Human
Insulin (18U)
In clinical studies in patients with type 1 and type 2 diabetes, after inhalation
of EXUBERA (insulin human [rdna origin]) , serum insulin reached peak concentration more quickly than after
subcutaneous injection of regular human insulin, 49 minutes (range 30 to 90
minutes) compared to 105 minutes (range60 to 240 minutes), respectively.
In clinical studies, the absorption of subcutaneous regular human insulin declined
with increasing patient body mass index (BMI). However, the absorption of insulin
following inhalation of EXUBERA (insulin human [rdna origin]) was independent of BMI.
In a study in healthy subjects, systemic insulin exposure (AUC and C max) following
administration of EXUBERA (insulin human [rdna origin]) increased with dose over a range of 1 to 6 mg when
administered as combinations of 1 and 3 mg blisters.
In a study where the dosage form of three 1 mg blisters was compared with one
3 mg blister, C and AUC after administration of three 1 mg blisters were approximately
30% and 40% max greater, respectively, than that after administration of one
3 mg blister (see DOSAGE AND ADMINISTRATION).
Distribution and Elimination
Because recombinant human insulin is identical to endogenous insulin, the systemic
distribution and elimination are expected to be the same. However, this has
not been confirmed for EXUBERA (insulin human [rdna origin]) .
Pharmacodynamics
EXUBERA (insulin human [rdna origin]) , like subcutaneously administered rapid-acting insulin analogs, has
a more rapid onset of glucose-lowering activity than subcutaneously administered
regular human insulin. In healthy volunteers, the duration of glucose-lowering
activity for EXUBERA (insulin human [rdna origin]) was comparable to subcutaneously administered regular human
insulin and longer than subcutaneously administered rapid-acting insulin analogs
(see Figure 2).
Figure 2. Mean Glucose Infusion Rate (GIR) Normalized to
GIRmax for Each Subject Treatment Versus Time in Healthy Volunteers
*Determined as amount of glucose infused to maintain constant plasma glucose
concentrations, normalized to maximum values (percent of maximum values); indicative
of insulin activity.
When EXUBERA (insulin human [rdna origin]) is inhaled, the onset of glucose-lowering activity in healthy
volunteers occurs within 10-20 minutes. The maximum effect on glucose lowering
is exerted approximately 2 hours after inhalation. The duration of glucose-lowering
activity is approximately 6 hours.
In patients with type 1 or type 2 diabetes, EXUBERA (insulin human [rdna origin]) has a greater glucose-lowering
effect within the first two hours after dosing when compared with subcutaneously
administered regular human insulin.
The intra-subject variability of glucose-lowering activity of EXUBERA (insulin human [rdna origin]) is generally
comparable to that of subcutaneously administered regular human insulin in patients
with type 1 and 2 diabetes.
Special Populations
Pediatric Patients
In children (6-11 years) and adolescents (12-17 years) with type
1 diabetes, time to peak insulin concentration for EXUBERA (insulin human [rdna origin]) was achieved faster
than for subcutaneous regular human insulin, which is consistent with observations
in adult patients with type 1 diabetes.
Geriatric Patients
There are no apparent differences in the pharmacokinetic properties of EXUBERA (insulin human [rdna origin])
when comparing patients over the age of 65 years and younger adult patients.
Gender
In subjects with and without diabetes, no apparent differences in the pharmacokinetic
properties of EXUBERA (insulin human [rdna origin]) were observed between men and women.
Race
A study was performed in 25 healthy Caucasian and Japanese non-diabetic subjects
to compare the pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic properties of EXUBERA (insulin human [rdna origin]) , versus
subcutaneous injection of regular human insulin. The pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic
properties of EXUBERA (insulin human [rdna origin]) were comparable between the two populations.
Obesity
The absorption of EXUBERA (insulin human [rdna origin]) is independent of patient BMI.
Renal Impairment
The effect of renal impairment on the pharmacokinetics of EXUBERA (insulin human [rdna origin]) has not been
studied. Careful glucose monitoring and dose adjustments of insulin may be necessary
in patients with renal dysfunction (see PRECAUTIONS,
Renal Impairment).
Hepatic Impairment
The effect of hepatic impairment on the pharmacokinetics of EXUBERA (insulin human [rdna origin]) has not
been studied. Careful glucose monitoring and dose adjustments of insulin may
be necessary in patients with hepatic dysfunction (see PRECAUTIONS,
Hepatic Impairment).
Pregnancy
The absorption of EXUBERA (insulin human [rdna origin]) in pregnant patients with gestational and pre-gestational
type 2 diabetes was consistent with that in non-pregnant patients with type
2 diabetes (see PRECAUTIONS, Pregnancy).
Smoking
In smokers, the systemic insulin exposure for EXUBERA (insulin human [rdna origin]) is expected to be 2 to
5 fold higher than in non-smokers. EXUBERA (insulin human [rdna origin]) is contraindicated in patients who
smoke or who have discontinued smoking less than 6 months prior to starting
EXUBERA (insulin human [rdna origin]) therapy. If a patient starts or resumes smoking, EXUBERA (insulin human [rdna origin]) must be discontinued
immediately due to the increased risk of hypoglycemia, and an alternative treatment
must be utilized (see CONTRAINDICATIONS).
In clinical studies of EXUBERA (insulin human [rdna origin]) in 123 patients (69 of whom were smokers), smokersexperienced
a more rapid onset of glucose-lowering action, greater maximum effect, and a
greater total glucose-lowering effect (particularly during the first 2-3
hours after dosing), compared to non-smokers.
Passive Cigarette Smoke
In contrast to the increase in insulin exposure following active smoking, when
EXUBERA (insulin human [rdna origin]) was administered to 30 healthy non-smoking volunteers following 2 hours
of exposure to passive cigarette smoke in a controlled experimental setting,
insulin AUC and Cmax were reduced by approximately 20% and 30%, respectively.
The pharmacokinetics of EXUBERA (insulin human [rdna origin]) have not been studied in nonsmokers who are
chronically exposed to passive cigarette smoke.
Patients with Underlying Lung Diseases
The use of EXUBERA (insulin human [rdna origin]) in patients with underlying lung disease, such as asthma
or COPD, is not recommended because the safety and efficacy of EXUBERA (insulin human [rdna origin]) in this
population have not been established (see WARNINGS). The use of EXUBERA (insulin human [rdna origin])
is contraindicated in patients withunstable or poorly controlled lung disease,
because of wide variations in lung function that could affect the absorption
of EXUBERA (insulin human [rdna origin]) and increase the risk of hypoglycemia or hyperglycemia (see CONTRAINDICATIONS).
In a pharmacokinetic study in 24 non-diabetic subjects with mild asthma, the
absorption of insulin following administration of EXUBERA (insulin human [rdna origin]) , in the absence of
treatment with abronchodilator, was approximately 20% lower than the absorption
seen in subjects without asthma. However, in a study in 24 non-diabetic subjects
with Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD), the systemic exposure following
administration of EXUBERA (insulin human [rdna origin]) was approximately two-fold higher than that in normal
subjects without COPD (see PRECAUTIONS, Underlying
Lung Disease).
Administration of albuterol 30 minutes prior to administration of EXUBERA (insulin human [rdna origin]) in
non-diabetic subjects with both mild asthma (n=36) and moderate asthma (n=31)
resulted in a mean increase in insulin AUC and C of between 25 and 50% compared
to when EXUBERA was max administered alone (see PRECAUTIONS: DRUG
INTERACTIONS).
Clinical Studies
The safety and efficacy of EXUBERA (insulin human [rdna origin]) has been studied in approximately 2500 adult
patients with type 1 and type 2 diabetes. The primary efficacy parameter for
most studies was glycemic control, as measured by the reduction from baseline
in hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c).
Type 1 Diabetes
A 24-week, randomized, open-label, active-control study (Study A) was conducted
in patients with type 1 diabetes to assess the safety and efficacy of EXUBERA (insulin human [rdna origin])
administered pre-mealthree times daily (TID) with a single nighttime injection
of Humulin ® U Ultralente ® (humaninsulin extended zinc suspension)
(n = 136). The comparator treatment was subcutaneous regular human insulin administered
twice daily (BID) (pre-breakfast and pre-dinner) with BID injection of NPH human
insulin (human insulin isophane suspension) (n = 132). In this study, the mean
age was 38.2 years (range: 20-64) and 52% of the subjects were male.
A second 24-week, randomized, open-label, active-control study (Study B) was
conducted in patients with type 1 diabetes to assess the safety and efficacy
of EXUBERA (insulin human [rdna origin]) (n = 103) compared to subcutaneous regular human insulin (n = 103)
when administered TID prior tomeals. In both treatment arms, NPH human insulin
was administered BID (in the morning and at bedtime) as the basal insulin. In
this study, the mean age was 38.4 years (range: 19-65) and 54% of the subjects
were male.
In each study, the reduction in HbA1c and the rates of hypoglycemia were comparable
for the two treatment groups. EXUBERA (insulin human [rdna origin]) -treated patients had a greater reduction
in fasting plasma glucose than patients in the comparator group. The percentage
of patients reaching an HbA1c level of < 8% (per American Diabetes
Association treatment Action Level at the time of study conduct) and an HbA1c
level of < 7% was comparable between the two treatment groups. Theresults
for Studies A and B are shown in Table 2.
Table 2: Results of Two 24-Week, Active-Control, Open-Label
Trials in Patients With Type 1 Diabetes (Studies A and B)
|
Study A |
Study B |
EXUBERA (TID) + UL (QD) |
SC R (BID) + NPH (BID) |
EXUBERA (TID) + NPH (BID) |
SC R (TID) + NPH (BID) |
Sample Size |
136 |
132 |
103 |
103 |
HbA1c (%) |
Baseline mean |
7.9 |
8.0 |
7.8 |
7.8 |
Adj. mean change from baseline |
-0.2 |
-0.4 |
-0.3 |
-0.2 |
EXUBERA minus SCR* 95% CI for treatment difference |
0.14
(-0.03,-0.32) |
-0.11
(-0.30, 0.08) |
Fasting Plasma Glucose (mg/dL) |
Baseline mean |
191 |
198 |
178 |
191 |
Adj. mean change from baseline |
-32 |
-6 |
-23 |
13 |
EXUBERA minus SC R
95% CI for treatment difference |
-27
(-47, -6) |
-35
(-58, -13) |
2-hr Post-Prandial Glucose Concentration (mg/dL)
|
Baseline mean |
283 |
305 |
273 |
293 |
Adj. mean change from baseline |
-21 |
14 |
-1 |
-3 |
EXUBERA minus SC R
95% CI for treatment difference |
-35
(-61, -8) |
|
2
(-29, 32) |
|
Patients with end-of-study HbA1c < 8%† |
64.0% |
68.2% |
74.8% |
66.0% |
Patients with end-of-study HbA1c < 7% |
16.9% |
19.7% |
28.2% |
30.1% |
Body Weight (kg) |
Baseline mean |
77.4 |
76.4 |
76.0 |
76.9 |
Adj. mean change from baseline (kg) |
0.4 |
1.1 |
0.4 |
0.6 |
EXUBERA minus SC R 95% CI for treatment difference |
-0.72
(-1.48, 0.04) |
|
-0.24
(-1.07, 0.59) |
|
End of study daily insulin dose |
Short-acting insulin |
13.4 mg ‡ |
18.3 IU |
10.9 mg ‡ |
25.7 IU |
Long-acting insulin |
26.4 IU |
37.1 IU |
31.5 IU |
31.9 IU |
®® UL = Humulin U Ultralente ; SC R = subcutaneous
regular human insulin
* A negative treatment difference favors EXUBERA (insulin human [rdna origin])
†American Diabetes Association treatment Action Level
at the time of study conduct
‡ 1 mg inhaled insulin from Exubera (insulin human [rdna origin]) is approximately
equivalent to 3 IU of subcutaneously injected regular human insulin (See
DOSAGE AND ADMINISTRATION) |
Type 2 Diabetes
Monotherapy in Patients Not Optimally Controlled With Diet and Exercise Treatment
A 12-week, randomized, open-label, active-control study (Study C) was conducted
in patients with type 2 diabetes not optimally controlled with diet and exercise,
assessing the safety and efficacy of pre-meal TID EXUBERA (insulin human [rdna origin]) (n = 75) compared
to an insulin-sensitizing agent. In this study, the mean age was 53.7 years
(range: 28-80), 55% of the subjects were male and the mean body mass index
was 32.3 kg/m2.
At 12 weeks, HbA1c levels in patients treated with EXUBERA (insulin human [rdna origin]) decreased 2.2%
(SD = 1.0) froma baseline of 9.5% (SD = 1.1). The proportion of patients treated
with EXUBERA (insulin human [rdna origin]) reaching anend-of-study HbA1c level of < 8% increased
to 82.7%. The proportion of patients treated with EXUBERA (insulin human [rdna origin]) reaching an end-of-study
HbA1c level of < 7 % was 44.6%. Fasting plasma glucose levels in
patients treated with EXUBERA (insulin human [rdna origin]) decreased 60 mg/dl from a baseline of 208 mg/dl.
Patients treated with EXUBERA (insulin human [rdna origin]) experienced a mean increase in body weight of
2 kg. The rateof hypoglycemia was higher in the Exubera (insulin human [rdna origin]) group than the group
receiving an insulin-sensitizing agent.
Monotherapy and Add-On Therapy in Patients Previously Treated With Oral Agent
Therapy
A 12-week, randomized, open-label, active-control study (Study D) was conducted
in patients with type 2 diabetes who were currently receiving treatment, but
were poorly controlled, withtwo oral agents (OA). Baseline OAs included an insulin
secretagogue, and either metformin or a thiazolidinedione. Patients were randomized
to one of three arms: continuing OA therapy alone (n = 96), switching to pre-meal
TID EXUBERA (insulin human [rdna origin]) monotherapy (n = 102) or adding pre-meal TID EXUBERA (insulin human [rdna origin]) to continued
OA therapy (n = 100). In this study, the mean age was 57.4 years (range: 33-80),
66% of the subjects were male and the mean body mass index was 30 kg/m2.
EXUBERA (insulin human [rdna origin]) monotherapy and EXUBERA (insulin human [rdna origin]) in combination with OA therapy were superior
to OA therapy alone in reducing HbA1c levels from baseline. The rates
of hypoglycemia for the two EXUBERA (insulin human [rdna origin]) treatment groups were slightly higher than
in the OA therapy alone group. Compared to OA therapy alone, the percentage
of patients reaching an HbA1c level of < 8% (per American Diabetes
Association treatment Action Level at time of study conduct) and an HbA 1c level
of < 7% was greater for patients treated with EXUBERA (insulin human [rdna origin]) monotherapy and EXUBERA (insulin human [rdna origin])
in combination with OA therapy. Patients in both EXUBERA (insulin human [rdna origin]) treatment groups had
greater reductions in fasting plasma glucose than patients treated with OA therapy
alone. The results for Study D are shown in Table 3.
Table 3: Results of a 12-Week, Active-Control, Open-Label
Trial in Patients With Type 2 Diabetes Not Optimally Controlled With Dual Oral
Agent Therapy (Study D)
StudyD |
EXUBERA monotherapy |
OAs * |
EXUBERA + OAs |
Sample Size |
102 |
96 |
100 |
HbA1c (%) |
Baseline |
9.3 |
9.3 |
9.2 |
Adj. mean change from baseline
|
-1.4 |
-0.2 |
-1.9 |
EXUBERA group minus OAs †
95% CI for treatment difference |
-1.18†,‡,§
(-1.41, .95) |
|
-1.67†,¶,§
(-1.90,-1.44) |
Fasting Plasma Glucose (mg/dL) |
Baseline mean |
203 |
203 |
195 |
Adj. mean change from baseline |
-23 |
1 |
-53 |
EXUBERA group minus OAs
95% CI for treatment difference |
-24‡
(-36,-11) |
|
-53¶
(-66,-41) |
Patients with end-of-study HbA1c < 8% # |
55.9% |
18.8% |
86.0% |
Patients with end-of-study HbA1c < 7% |
16.7% |
1.0% |
32.0% |
Body Weight |
|
|
|
Baseline mean (kg)
|
89.5 |
88.0 |
88.6 |
Adj. mean change from baseline (kg) |
2.8 |
0.0 |
2.7 |
EXUBERA group minus OAs
95% CI for treatment difference |
2.80‡
(1.94, 3.65) |
|
2.75
(1.89,3.61) |
* OAs = treatment with two oral agents (an insulin secretagogue
in addition to metformin or a thiazolidinedione)
&Dagger A negative treatment difference favors EXUBERA (insulin human [rdna origin])
&Dagger Comparison of EXUBERA (insulin human [rdna origin]) monotherapy to combination oral agent therapy
alone
§ p < 0.0001
¶ Comparison of EXUBERA (insulin human [rdna origin]) plus oral agents to combination
oral agent therapy alone
# American Diabetes Association treatment Action Level at the
time of study conduct |
A 24-week, randomized, open-label, active-control study (Study E) was conducted
in patients with type 2 diabetes, currently receiving sulfonylurea therapy.
This study was designed toassess the safety and efficacy of the addition of
pre-meal EXUBERA (insulin human [rdna origin]) to continued sulfonylurea therapy (n = 214) compared to the
addition of pre-meal metformin to continued sulfonylurea therapy (n = 196).
Subjects were stratified according to their HbA1c at Week -1. Two
strata were defined: a low HbA1c stratum (HbA1c ≥ 8% to ≤ 9.5%)
and a high HbA1c stratum (HbA1c > 9.5 to ≤ 12%).
EXUBERA (insulin human [rdna origin]) in combination with sulfonylurea was superior to metformin and sulfonylurea
in reducing HbA1c values from baseline in the high stratum group.
EXUBERA (insulin human [rdna origin]) in combination with sulfonylurea was comparable to metformin in combination
with sulfonylurea in reducing HbA1c values from baseline in the low
stratum group. The rate of hypoglycemia was higher after the addition of EXUBERA (insulin human [rdna origin])
to sulfonylurea than after the addition of metformin to sulfonylurea. The percentage
of patients reaching target HbA 1c values of 8% and 7% was comparable between
treatment groups in both strata, as was reduction in fasting plasma glucose
(see Table 4).
Another 24-week, randomized, open-label, active-control study (Study F) was
conducted in patients with type 2 diabetes, currently receiving metformin therapy.
This study was designed to assess the safety and efficacy of the addition of
pre-meal EXUBERA (insulin human [rdna origin]) to continued metformin therapy (n = 234) compared to the addition
of pre-meal glibenclamide to continued metformin therapy (n = 222). Subjects
in this study were also stratified to one of two strata as defined inStudy E.
EXUBERA (insulin human [rdna origin]) in combination with metformin was superior to glibenclamide and metformin
in reducing HbA1c values from baseline and achieving target HbA1c values in
the high stratum group. EXUBERA (insulin human [rdna origin]) in combination with metformin was comparable
to glibenclamide in combination with metformin in reducing HbA1c
values from baseline and achieving target HbA1c values in the low
stratum group. The rate of hypoglycemia was slightly higher after the addition
of EXUBERA (insulin human [rdna origin]) to metformin than after the addition of glibenclamide to metformin.
Reduction in fasting plasma glucose was comparable between treatment groups
(see Table 4).
Table 4: Results of Two 24-Week, Active-Control, Open-Label
Trials in Patients With Type 2 Diabetes Previously On Oral Agent Therapy (Studies
E and F)
|
Study E |
Study F |
Exubera+ SU* |
Met*+ SU* |
Exubera+ SU* |
Met*+ SU* |
Exubera + Met* |
Gli*+ Met* |
Exubera + Met* |
Gli*+ Met* |
High stratum† |
Low stratum† |
High stratum† |
Low stratum† |
Sample Size |
113 |
103 |
101 |
93 |
109 |
103 |
125 |
119 |
HbA1c (%) |
Baseline mean |
10.5 |
10.6 |
8.8 |
8.8 |
10.4 |
10.6 |
8.6 |
8.7 |
Adj. mean change from baseline |
-2.2 |
-1.8 |
-1.9 |
-1.9 |
-2.2 |
-1.9 |
-1.8 |
-1.9 |
EXUBERA minus OA ‡ 95% CI for treatment
difference |
-0.38 ‡,§
(-0.63, -0.14) |
-0.07
(-0.33, 0.19) |
-0.37‡,¶
(-0.62, -0.12)-1.9 |
0.04
(-0.19, 0.27) |
Fasting Plasma Glucose (mg/dL) |
Baseline mean |
241 |
237 |
197 |
198 |
223 |
243 |
187 |
196 |
Mean change from baseline |
-46 |
-47 |
-48 |
-52 |
-42 |
-40 |
-46 |
-49 |
EXUBERA minus OA 95% CI for treatment difference |
1
(-11, 12) |
4
(-8, 16) |
-2
(-14, 10) |
4
(-7, 15) |
Subjects with end-of-study HbA1c < 8%# |
48.7% |
44.7% |
81.2% |
73.1% |
72.5% |
56.3% |
80.8% |
86.6% |
Subjects with end-of-study HbA1c < 7% |
20.4% |
14.6% |
30.7% |
32.3% |
33.9% |
17.5% |
40.0% |
42.9% |
Body Weight |
Baseline mean (kg) |
80.8 |
79.5 |
79.9 |
81.9 |
88.3 |
87.8 |
90.3 |
88.2 |
Adj. mean change from baseline (kg) |
3.6 |
-0.0 |
2.4 |
-0.3 |
2.8 |
2.5 |
2.0 |
1.6 |
EXUBERA minus OA 95% CI for treatment difference |
3.60
(2.81, 4.39) |
2.67
(1.84, 3.51) |
0.26
(-0.70, 1.21) |
0.38
(-0.52, 1.27) |
* SU = sulfonylurea, Met = metformin, Gli
= glibenclamide
†Low stratum = entry HbA1c ≥ 8.0% to ≤
9.5%; high stratum = entry HbA1c > 9.5% to ≥ 12%
‡ A negative treatment difference favors EXUBERA (insulin human [rdna origin])
§ p = 0.002
¶ p = 0.004
# American Diabetes Association treatment Action Level at the
time of study conduct |
Use in Patients Previously Treated With Subcutaneous Insulin
A 24-week, randomized, open-label, active-control study (Study G) was conducted
in insulin-treated patients with type 2 diabetes to assess the safety and efficacy
of EXUBERA (insulin human [rdna origin]) administered pre-meal TID with a single nighttime injection of Humulin
® U Ultralente ® (n =146) compared to subcutaneous regular human insulin
administered BID (pre-breakfast and pre-dinner) with BID injection of NPH human
insulin (n = 149). In this study, the mean age was 57.5 years (range: 23-80),
66% of the subjects were male and the mean body mass index was 30.3 kg/m2.
The reductions from baseline in HbA1c, percent of patients reaching
an HbA1c level of < 8% (per American Diabetes Association treatment
Action Level at time of study conduct) and an HbA1c level of < 7%,
as well as the rates of hypoglycemia, were similar between treatment groups.
EXUBERA (insulin human [rdna origin]) -treated patients had a greater reduction in fasting plasma glucose than
patients in the comparator group. The results for Study G are shown in Table
5.
Table 5: Results of a 24-Week, Active-Control, Open-Label
Trial in Patients With Type 2 Diabetes Previously Treated With Subcutaneous
Insulin (Study G)
Study G |
(QD)
EXUBERA (TID) + UL |
(BID)
SC R (BID) + NPH
|
Sample Size |
146 |
149
|
HbA1c (%) |
Baseline mean |
8.1 |
8.2 |
Adj. mean change from baseline |
0.7 |
-0.6 |
EXUBERA minus SCR* 95% CI for treatment difference |
-0.07
(-0.31, 0.17) |
Fasting Plasma Glucose (mg/dL) |
Baseline mean |
152 |
159 |
Adj. mean change from baseline |
-22 |
-6 |
EXUBERA minus SC R 95% CI for treatment difference |
-16.36
(-27.09, -5.36) |
Patients with end-of-study HbA1c < 8%† |
76.0% |
69.1% |
Patients with end-of-study HbA1c < 7% |
45.2% |
32.2% |
Body Weight |
Baseline mean (kg) |
90.6 |
89.0 |
Adj. mean change from baseline (kg) |
0.1 |
1.3 |
EXUBERA minus SC R 95% CI for treatment difference |
-1.28
(-1.96, -0.60)
|
End of study daily insulin dose |
Short-acting insulin |
16.6 mg‡ |
25.5 IU |
Long-acting insulin |
37.9 IU |
52.3 IU |
UL = Humulin® U Ultralente®; SC R = subcutaneous
regular human insulin
* A negative treatment difference favors EXUBERA (insulin human [rdna origin])
† American Diabetes Association treatment Action Level at
the time of study conduct
‡ 1 mg inhaled insulin from Exubera (insulin human [rdna origin]) is approximately
equivalent to 3 IU of subcutaneously injected regular human insulin. See
DOSAGE AND ADMINISTRATION |