Clinical Pharmacology for Evusheld
Mechanism Of Action
Tixagevimab and cilgavimab are two recombinant human IgG1κ monoclonal antibodies with amino acid substitutions to extend antibody half-life (YTE), reduce antibody effector function, and minimize the potential risk of antibody-dependent enhancement of disease (TM). Tixagevimab and cilgavimab can simultaneously bind to non-overlapping regions of the receptor binding domain (RBD) of SARS-CoV-2 spike protein. Tixagevimab, cilgavimab, and their combination bind to spike protein with equilibrium dissociation constants of KD = 2.76 pM, 13.0 pM and 13.7 pM, respectively, blocking its interaction with human ACE2, the SARS-CoV-2 receptor, which is required for virus attachment. Tixagevimab, cilgavimab, and their combination blocked RBD binding to human ACE2 with IC50 values of 0.32 nM (48 ng/mL), 0.53 nM (80 ng/mL), and 0.43 nM (65 ng/mL), respectively.
Pharmacokinetics
A summary of PK parameters and properties of tixagevimab and cilgavimab following administration of a single EVUSHELD (300 mg of tixagevimab and 300 mg of cilgavimab) intramuscular dose is provided in Table 5.
Table 5 : Summary of PK Parameters and Properties of Tixagevimab and Cilgavimab Following a Single EVUSHELD (300 mg Tixagevimab and 300 mg Cilgavimab) Intramuscular Dose
| PK Parameters |
Tixagevimab |
Cilgavimab |
| Cmax (Mg/mL)* |
21.9 (61.7) |
20.3 (63.6) |
| Tmax (day)† |
14.9 (1.1 -86) |
15.0 (1.1 -85) |
| C2 (μg/mL)‡ |
9.5 (77) |
9.1 (80) |
| C84 (μg/mL)§ |
15 (48) |
14 (51) |
| AUC0-84 (day•Mg/mL)* |
1408 (54) |
1307 (58) |
| Absorption |
| Bioavailability# ¶ |
68.5 |
65.8 |
| Distribution |
| Apparent Volume of Distribution (L)# |
7.7 (1.97) |
8.7 (2.73) |
| Elimination |
| Half-life (days)#¶ |
87.9 (13.9) |
82.9 (12.3) |
| Apparent Clearance (L/day)# |
0.062 (0.019) |
0.074 (0.028) |
| Metabolism |
Catabolic pathways; Same manner as endogenous IgG |
| Excretion |
Not likely to undergo renal excretion |
* Geomean (geometric %CV)
† Median (range)
‡ Observed geomean (geometric %CV) concentration 2 day after dosing
§ Observed geomean (geometric %CV) concentration 84 days after dosing
# Arithmetic mean (SD)
¶Based on a single EVUSHELD (150 mg tixagevimab and 150 mg cilgavimab) |
In the PROVENT repeat dose sub-study, following a second IM dose of EVUSHELD (150 mg of tixagevimab and 150 mg of cilgavimab) administered 10 to 14 months after the initial IM dose of EVUSHELD (150 mg of tixagevimab and 150 mg of cilgavimab) (N= 53), the geometric mean serum concentration was 26.4 μg/mL on post-administration Day 29. This serum concentration was similar to the geometric mean drug concentration on post-administration Day 29 (23.3 μg/mL) following the initial IM EVUSHELD dose (150 mg of tixagevimab and 150 mg of cilgavimab) in the PROVENT parent study.
The primary analysis in the clinical efficacy study PROVENT was conducted prior to the emergence of the Omicron variant; the dominant variants in circulation at that time were Alpha, Beta, Gamma, and Delta. Pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic modeling using cell-based EC50 values of EVUSHELD against the currently circulating variants in the U.S. suggest in vivo activity against these variants may be retained at drug concentrations achieved following a single EVUSHELD initial dose of 300 mg tixagevimab and 300 mg cilgavimab for 6 months [see DOSAGE AND ADMINISTRATION].
Specific Populations
The PK profile of tixagevimab and cilgavimab were not affected by sex, age, race or ethnicity. Body weight had no clinically relevant effect on the PK of tixagevimab and cilgavimab in adults over the range of 36 kg to 177 kg.
Pediatric Population
The PK of tixagevimab and cilgavimab in pediatric individuals have not been evaluated.
The dosing regimen is expected to result in comparable plasma exposures of tixagevimab and cilgavimab in pediatric individuals ages 12 years of age or older who weigh at least 40 kg as observed in adult individuals [see Use In Specific Populations].
Renal Impairment
Tixagevimab and cilgavimab are not eliminated intact in the urine.
Renal impairment is not expected to impact the PK of tixagevimab and cilgavimab, since monoclonal antibodies with molecular weight >69 kDa are known not to undergo renal elimination. Similarly, dialysis is not expected to impact the PK of tixagevimab and cilgavimab.
There is no difference in the clearance of tixagevimab and cilgavimab in individuals with mild or moderate renal impairment compared to individuals with normal renal function. There were insufficient subjects with severe renal impairment to draw conclusions [see Use In Specific Populations].
Hepatic Impairment
No specific studies have been conducted to examine the effects of hepatic impairment on the PK of tixagevimab and cilgavimab. The impact of hepatic impairment on the PK of tixagevimab and cilgavimab is unknown [see Use In Specific Populations].
Drug Interaction Studies
Drug-drug interaction studies have not been performed. Based on key elimination pathways, tixagevimab and cilgavimab interactions with concomitant medications that are renally excreted or that are substrates, inducers, or inhibitors of CYP enzymes are unlikely [see DRUG INTERACTIONS].
Microbiology
Antiviral Activity
In a neutralization assay on Vero E6 cells, tixagevimab, cilgavimab, and their combination neutralized SARS-CoV-2 (USA-WA1/2020 isolate) with EC50 values of 60.7 pM (9 ng/mL), 211.5 pM (32 ng/mL), and 65.9 pM (10 ng/mL), respectively.
Tixagevimab, cilgavimab, and their combination showed reduced or no antibody-dependent cellmediated cytotoxicity (ADCC), antibody-dependent cellular phagocytosis (ADCP), or antibodydependent natural killer cell activation (ADNKA) in cell culture studies. Tixagevimab, cilgavimab, and their combination did not mediate antibody-dependent complement deposition (ADCD) activity with guinea pig complement proteins.
Antibody Dependent Enhancement (ADE) Of Infection
The potential of tixagevimab and cilgavimab to mediate antibody-dependent viral entry was assessed in FcγRII-expressing Raji cells co-incubated with recombinant virus-like particles (VLPs) pseudotyped with SARS-CoV-2 spike protein, with antibody concentrations at a range of 6.6 nM (1 μg/mL) to 824 pM (125 ng/mL). Tixagevimab, cilgavimab, and their combination did not mediate entry of VLPs into these cells under the tested conditions.
The potential for ADE was also evaluated in a non-human primate model of SARS-CoV-2 using EVUSHELD. Intravascular administration prior to virus inoculation resulted in a dose-dependent improvement in all measured outcomes (total viral RNA in the lungs or nasal mucosae, infectious virus levels in the lungs based on TCID50 measurements, or lung injury and pathology based on histology measurements). No evidence of enhancement of viral replication or disease was observed at any dose evaluated, including sub-neutralizing doses down to 0.04 mg/kg.
Antiviral Resistance
There is a potential risk of treatment failure due to the development of viral variants that are resistant to tixagevimab and cilgavimab. Prescribing healthcare providers should consider the prevalence of SARS-CoV-2 variants in their area, where data are available, when considering prophylactic treatment options.
Escape variants were identified following serial passage in cell culture of SARS-CoV-2 or replication competent recombinant vesicular stomatitis virus (VSV) expressing SARS-CoV-2 spike protein in the presence of tixagevimab or cilgavimab individually or in combination. Variants which showed reduced susceptibility to cilgavimab expressed spike protein amino acid substitutions R346I (>200-fold), K444E (>200-fold), and K444R (>200-fold). No escape variants to tixagevimab, or the tixagevimab and cilgavimab combination were selected.
In neutralization assays using recombinant VLPs pseudotyped with SARS-CoV-2 spike and harboring individual spike amino acid substitutions identified in circulating SARS-CoV-2, variants with reduced susceptibility to cilgavimab alone included those with R346I (>200-fold), K444E (>200-fold), K444Q (>200-fold), K444R (>200-fold), V445A (21- to 51-fold), G446V (4.2-fold), N450K (9.1-fold), or L452R (5.8-fold) substitutions. Variants with reduced susceptibility to tixagevimab alone included those with Q414R (4.6-fold), L455F (2.5- to 4.7-fold), G476S (3.3-fold), E484D (7.1-fold), E484K (6.2- to 12- fold), E484Q (3.0-fold), F486S (>600-fold), F486V (121- to 149-fold), Q493K (2.4- to 3.2-fold), Q493R (7.9-fold), E990A (6.1-fold), or T1009I (8.2-fold) substitutions. Variants harboring an E484K (2.4- to 5.4-fold), Q493R (3.4-fold), E990A (5.7-fold), or T1009I (4.5-fold) substitution exhibited low level reduced susceptibility to tixagevimab and cilgavimab in combination.
VLPs pseudotyped with the SARS-CoV-2 spike of variant strains with reduced susceptibility to cilgavimab included those with R346K:E484K:N501Y (Mu, 21-fold), and those with reduced susceptibility to tixagevimab included those harboring E484K (Alpha, 18.5-fold; Beta, 3.5- to 15-fold; Zeta, 7.3-fold). Similar results were observed, where data was available, in neutralization assays using authentic SARS-CoV-2 variant strains.
VLPs pseudotyped with the SARS-CoV-2 spike of Omicron BA.1 or BA.1.1 (BA.1+R346K) showed reduced susceptibility to tixagevimab (>600- to >1,000-fold or 460-fold, respectively) and to cilgavimab (>700- to >1,000-fold or >500-fold, respectively). VLPs pseudotyped with the SARS-CoV-2 spike of Omicron BA.2 or BA.2.12.1 showed reduced susceptibility to tixagevimab (>1,000-fold or >500-fold, respectively) but not to cilgavimab (1.9-fold or 2-fold, respectively). VLPs pseudotyped with the SARS-CoV-2 spike of Omicron BA.3 showed reduced susceptibility to tixagevimab (>5,000-fold) but not to cilgavimab (4-fold). VLPs pseudotyped with the SARS-CoV-2 spike of Omicron BA.4/BA.5 showed reduced susceptibility to tixagevimab (>10,000-fold) and cilgavimab (7.5- to 9-fold). The effects of the individual substitutions in Omicron spike glycoproteins on neutralization susceptibility are being investigated.
The neutralizing activity of tixagevimab and cilgavimab in combination was tested against pseudotyped VLPs and/or authentic SARS-CoV-2 variant strains harboring all spike substitutions identified in Alpha (B.1.1.7, 0.5- to 5.2-fold), Beta (B.1.351, 1.0- to 3.8-fold), Gamma (P.1, 0.4- to 2.0- fold), Delta (B.1.617.2, 0.6- to 1.2-fold), and Delta [+K417N] (AY.1/ AY.2, 1.0-fold) variants of concern, and Eta (B.1.525, 3.1-fold), Iota (B.1.526, 0.3- to 3.4-fold), Kappa (B.1.617.1, 0.5- to 3.4- fold) Lambda (C.37, 0.7-fold), and Mu (B.1.621, 7.5-fold) variants of interest. Tixagevimab and cilgavimab in combination was also tested against Epsilon (B.1.427 / B.1.429, 0.8- to 3.5-fold), R.1 (3.5-fold), B.1.1.519 (1.4-fold), C.36.3 (2.3-fold), B.1.214.2 (0.8-fold), and B.1.619.1 (3.3-fold) variant alerts for further monitoring and B.1.616 (0.5-fold), A.23.1 (0.4-fold), A.27 (0.8-fold), and AV.1 (5.9- fold) variants de-escalated from further monitoring (Table 6).
Preliminary data for the neutralizing activities of tixagevimab and cilgavimab in combination against circulating Omicron subvariants are available. VLPs pseudotyped with the SARS-CoV-2 spike of Omicron BA.1 or BA.1.1 (BA.1+R346K) showed reduced neutralizing activity (132- to 183-fold or 424- fold, respectively), Omicron BA.2 showed no change in neutralizing activity (3.2-fold). VLPs pseudotyped with the spike of Omicron BA.2.12.1, BA.3, or BA.4/BA.5 showed 5-fold, 16-fold, and 33- to 65-fold reductions in neutralizing activity, respectively. Authentic Omicron BA.1 (12- to 30-fold) and BA.1.1 (176-fold) viruses showed reduced susceptibility, Omicron BA.2 showed minimal change in neutralizing activity (5.4-fold).
Data collection is ongoing to better understand how the reductions in activity seen in pseudotyped VLP assays or authentic SARS-CoV-2 assays may correlate with clinical outcomes.
Table 6 : EVUSHELD Pseudotyped Virus-Like Particles and Authentic SARS-CoV-2 Neutralization Data for SARS-CoV-2 Variants
| Lineage with Spike Protein Substitution |
Country First Identified |
WHO Nomenclature |
Key Substitutions Tested |
Fold Reduction in Susceptibility* (Pseudotyped VLPs†) |
Fold Reduction in Susceptibility* (Authentic virus‡) |
| B.1.1.7 |
UK |
Alpha |
N501Y |
0.5- to 5.2-fold |
No Change§ |
| B.1.351 |
South Africa |
Beta |
K417N + E484K + N501Y |
No Change§ |
No Change§ |
| P.1 |
Brazil |
Gamma |
K417T + E484K + N501Y |
No Change§ |
No Change§ |
| B.1.617.2 |
India |
Delta |
L452R + T478K |
No Change§ |
No Change§ |
| AY.1/ AY.2 |
India |
Delta [ + K417N] |
K417N + L452R + T478K |
No Change§ |
No Change§ |
| BA.1 |
Botswana |
Omicron (BA.1) |
G339D + S371L + S373P + S375F + K417N + N440K + G446S + S477N + T478K + E484A + Q493R + G496S + Q489R + N501Y + Y505H |
132-to 183-fold# |
12- to 30-fold |
| BA.1.1 |
Multiple country origin |
Omicron (BA.1.1) [ + R346K] |
G339D + R346K + S371L + S373P + S375F + K417N + N440K + G446S + S477N + T478K + E484A + Q493R + G496S + Q489R + N501Y + Y505H |
424-fold |
176-fold |
| BA.2 |
Multiple country origin |
Omicron (BA.2) |
G339D + S371F + S373P + S375F + T376A + D405N + R408S + K417N + N440K + S477N + T478K + E484A + Q493R + Q498R + N501Y + Y505H |
No Change§ |
5.4-fold |
| BA.2.12.1 |
United States |
Omicron (BA.2.12.1) |
G339D + S371F + S373P + S375F + T376A + D405N + R408S + K417N + N440K + L452Q + S477N + T478K + E484A + Q493R + Q498R + N501Y + Y505H |
5-fold |
ND |
| BA.3 |
Multiple country origin |
Omicron (BA.3) |
G339D + S371F + S373P + S375F + D405N + K417N + N440K + G446S + S477N + T478K + E484A + Q493R + Q498R + N501Y + Y505H |
16-fold |
ND |
| BA.4/5 |
Mulitple country origin |
Omicron (BA.4/5) |
+ G339D + S371F + S373P + S375F + T376A + D405N + R408S + K417N + N440K + L452R + S477N + T478K + E484A + F486V + Q498R + N501Y + Y505H |
33- to 65-fold |
ND |
| B.1.525 |
Multiple country origin |
Eta |
E484K |
No Change§ |
ND |
| B.1.526 |
United States |
Iota |
E484K |
No Change§ |
No Change§ |
| B.1.617.1 |
India |
Kappa |
L452R + E484Q |
No Change§ |
No Change§ |
| C.37 |
Peru |
Lambda |
L452Q + F490S |
No Change§ |
ND |
| B.1.621 |
Colombia |
Mu |
R346K + E484K + N501Y |
7.5-fold |
ND |
| B.1.427 / B.1.429 |
United States |
Epsilon |
L452R |
No Change§ |
No Change§ |
| R.1 |
Multiple country origin |
- |
E484K |
No Change§ |
ND |
| B.1.1.519 |
Multiple country origin |
- |
T478K |
No Change§ |
ND |
| C.36.3 |
Multiple country origin |
- |
R346S:L452R |
No Change§ |
ND |
| B.1.214.2 |
Multiple country origin |
- |
Q414K:N450K |
No Change§ |
ND |
| B.1.619.1 |
Multiple country origin |
- |
N440K:E484K |
No Change§ |
ND |
| P.2 |
Brazil |
Zeta |
E484K |
No Change§ |
ND |
| B.1.616 |
France |
- |
V483A |
No Change§ |
ND |
| A.23.1 |
UK |
- |
V367F |
No Change§ |
ND |
| A.27 |
Multiple country origin |
- |
L452R + N501Y |
No Change§ |
ND |
| AV.1 |
Multiple country origin |
- |
N439K + E484K |
5.9-fold |
ND |
* Range of reduced potency across multiple variants of each lineage using research-grade pseudotyped VLP neutralization assays; mean fold change in half maximal effective concentration (EC50) of mAb required for a 50% reduction in infection compared to wild type reference strain
† Pseudotyped virus-like particles expressing the entire SARS-CoV-2 spike variant protein and individual characteristic spike substitutions except L452Q were tested including Alpha ( + L455F, E484K, F490S, Q493R, and/or S494P), and Delta ( + K417N) harboring additional indicated RBD substitutions that are no longer detected or detected at extremely low levels within these lineages
‡ Authentic SARS-CoV-2 expressing the entire variant spike protein were tested including Alpha ( + E484K or S494P) harboring additional indicated RBD substitutions that are no longer detected or detected at extremely low levels within these lineages
§ No change: <5-fold reduction in susceptibility
# EC50 value = 1.13 – 1.83 nM (171 - 277 ng/mL)
ND, not determined; RBD, receptor binding domain |
It is not known how pseudotyped VLPs or authentic SARS-CoV-2 neutralization susceptibility data correlate with clinical outcome.
In PROVENT, illness visit sequencing data were available for 21 of 33 subjects with SARS-CoV-2 infection (6 who received tixagevimab and cilgavimab and 15 placebo). Fourteen subjects were infected with variants of concern or variants of interest, including 8 subjects with Alpha (B.1.1.7) (8 who received placebo), 1 subject with Beta (B.1.351) (1 who received tixagevimab and cilgavimab), 3 subjects with Delta (B.1.617.2) (3 who received placebo), and 2 subjects with Epsilon (B.1.429) (2 who received tixagevimab and cilgavimab). Seven additional subjects were infected with B.1.375 (1 who received tixagevimab and cilgavimab) or the A_1 set of lineages containing a constellation of spike protein substitutions including D614G and P681H or Q677P (3 who received tixagevimab and cilgavimab and 3 placebo). Additional spike protein RBD substitutions detected at low frequency (between 3% and 24%) included V503F in the tixagevimab and cilgavimab group.
In STORM CHASER, illness visit sequencing data was available for 19 of 19 subjects with SARSCoV- 2 infections (12 of 12 who received tixagevimab and cilgavimab and 7 of 7 placebo). At an allele fraction ≥25%, 12 of 19 subjects were infected with variants of concern or variants of interest, including 9 subjects with Alpha (B.1.1.7) (5 who received tixagevimab and cilgavimab and 4 placebo) and 3 subjects with Epsilon (B.1.427 / B.1.429) (2 who received tixagevimab and cilgavimab and 1 placebo). Seven additional subjects were infected with B.1.1.519 (1 who received tixagevimab and cilgavimab) or the A_1 set of lineages containing a constellation of spike protein substitutions including D614G and D138H, Q675H, Q677H, or V1176F (4 who received tixagevimab and cilgavimab and 2 placebo). Additional spike protein RBD substitutions detected at an allele fraction ≥3% included S325P, Del342, C361W, Del428, F429V, and F515C in the tixagevimab and cilgavimab group.
Evaluation of neutralization susceptibility of variants identified through global surveillance and in subjects who received tixagevimab and cilgavimab is ongoing.
It is possible that variants resistant to tixagevimab and cilgavimab could have cross-resistance to other monoclonal antibodies targeting the RBD of SARS-CoV-2. The combination of tixagevimab and cilgavimab retained activity against pseudotyped VLPs harboring individual SARS-CoV-2 spike substitutions (K417E/N, D420N, K444Q, V445A, Y453F, L455F, N460K/S/T, E484D/K/Q, F486V, F490S, Q493K/R, and S494P) identified in neutralization escape variants of other monoclonal antibodies targeting the RBD of SARS-CoV-2 spike protein.
Immunogenicity
There are no immunogenicity data available for the currently authorized dosing regimen (EVUSHELD [300 mg of tixagevimab and 300 mg cilgavimab] administered every 6 months).
There was no apparent clinically significant effect of anti-EVUSHELD antibodies (ADA) on the safety or effectiveness of EVUSHELD in PROVENT (EVUSHELD [150 mg of tixagevimab and 150 mg cilgavimab]), but data are limited at this time. There is up to a 26% decrease, on average, in serum concentrations of EVUSHELD over time through 183 days post-administration in subjects with positive ADA after the initial dose compared to subjects who tested negative for ADA after the initial dose; the clinical significance of this decrease is unknown.
In PROVENT, following a single IM dose of EVUSHELD (150 mg of tixagevimab and 150 mg
cilgavimab) (baseline: study Day 1) through study Day 183, treatment-emergent anti-tixagevimab, anti-cilgavimab and anti-EVUSHELD antibodies were detected in 3% (101/3152), 4% (113/3068) and 5% (156/3158) ADA-evaluable participants, respectively, who received EVUSHELD (150 mg of tixagevimab and 150 mg of cilgavimab). The average Day 8, 29, and 183 serum concentrations of EVUSHELD were approximately 0%, 12%, and 26% lower, respectively, in subjects who tested positive for ADA after the initial dose versus subjects who tested negative for ADA after the initial dose.
In the PROVENT repeat dose sub-study, following a subsequent single IM dose of EVUSHELD (150 mg of tixagevimab and 150 mg cilgavimab) (baseline: sub-study Day 1) through sub-study Day 29, treatment-emergent anti-tixagevimab, anti-cilgavimab and anti-EVUSHELD antibodies were detected in 0% (0/49), 10% (5/49) and 10% (5/49) ADA-evaluable subjects, respectively. The average Day 29 concentration of EVUSHELD was approximately 14% lower in subjects who tested positive for ADA after the second dose versus subjects who tested negative for ADA after the second dose. The time between repeat doses was 10 to 14 months (first IM dose administered in the original PROVENT study to second IM dose administered in the PROVENT sub-study).
The observed incidence of ADA is highly dependent on the sensitivity and specificity of the assay. Differences in assay methods preclude meaningful comparisons of the incidence of ADA in the studies described above with the incidence of ADA in other studies.
Animal Toxicology And Pharmacology
In a toxicology study in cynomolgus monkeys, tixagevimab and cilgavimab had no adverse effects when administered via IM injection.
In tissue cross-reactivity studies with tixagevimab and cilgavimab using human adult and fetal tissues no binding of clinical concern was detected.
Tixagevimab and cilgavimab have been assessed in rhesus macaque and cynomolgus macaque models of SARS-CoV-2 infection. Prophylactic administration of tixagevimab and cilgavimab (N= 4 rhesus macaque; N= 3 cynomolgus macaque) three days prior to infection prevented SARS-CoV-2 infection of the upper and lower respiratory tracts in dose-dependent manner. Prophylactic administration of 4 mg/kg tixagevimab and cilgavimab resulted in a 7-log10 reduction in viral subgenomic messenger RNA (sgmRNA) in nasopharyngeal swabs and 5 to 6-log10 reduction in sgmRNA or infectious virus titer in bronchoalveolar lavage samples at Day 2 post-challenge in all animals relative to placebo-treated animals. Compared to placebo, prophylactic administration of tixagevimab and cilgavimab (N= 3 cynomolgus macaque) reduced lung injury associated with SARS-CoV-2 infection.
The applicability of these findings to a clinical setting is not known.
Clinical Studies
The data supporting this EUA are based on analyses from the Phase III trials PROVENT (NCT04625725) and STORM CHASER (NCT04625972). Both trials are evaluating the safety and efficacy of EVUSHELD (150 mg of tixagevimab and 150 mg of cilgavimab) for the prophylaxis SARSCoV-2 symptomatic illness (COVID-19).
Efficacy Data From PROVENT
PROVENT is an ongoing Phase III, randomized (2:1), double-blind, placebo-controlled clinical trial studying EVUSHELD for the pre-exposure prophylaxis of COVID-19 in adults ≥18 years of age. All subjects were either ≥60 years of age, had a pre-specified co-morbidity (obesity, congestive heart failure, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, chronic kidney disease, chronic liver disease, immunocompromised state, or previous history of severe or serious adverse event after receiving any approved vaccine), or were at increased risk of SARS-CoV-2 infection due to their living situation or occupation. Subjects could not have previously received a COVID-19 vaccine. Subjects received a single dose (administered as two IM injections) of EVUSHELD or placebo. The study excluded subjects with a history of laboratory-confirmed SARS-CoV-2 infection or SARS-CoV-2 antibody positivity at screening. Once COVID-19 vaccines were locally available, subjects were permitted on request to unblind to make an informed decision on vaccine timing and to receive COVID-19 vaccination.
The baseline demographics were balanced across the EVUSHELD and placebo arms. The median age was 57 years (with 43% of subjects aged 60 years or older), 46% of subjects were female, 73% were White, 3% were Asian 17% were Black/African American, and 15% were Hispanic/Latino. Of the 5,197 subjects, 78% had baseline co-morbidities or characteristics associated with an increased risk for severe COVID-19, including obesity (42%), diabetes (14%), cardiovascular disease (8%), cancer, including a history of cancer (7%), chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (5%), chronic kidney disease (5%), chronic liver disease (5%), immunosuppressive medications (3%) and immunosuppressive disease (<1%).
For the primary endpoint, a subject was defined as a COVID-19 case if their first case of SARS-CoV- 2 RT-PCR-positive symptomatic illness occurred after administration and prior to Day 183. The primary analysis included 5,172 subjects who were SARS-CoV-2 RT-PCR-negative at baseline, of which 3,441 received EVUSHELD and 1,731 received placebo. Only events that occurred prior to unblinding or vaccine receipt were included. EVUSHELD receipt resulted in a statistically significant (p-value <0.001) 77% reduction in incidence of SARS-CoV-2 RT-PCR-positive symptomatic illness (COVID-19) when compared to placebo (Table 7). At the time of analysis the median follow-up time post-administration was 83 days (range 3 to 166 days).
Similar results were observed for EVUSHELD recipients compared to placebo recipients in the reduction in incidence of SARS-CoV-2 RT-PCR-positive symptomatic illness or death from any cause (12/3,441 versus 19/1,731, respectively) with relative risk reduction of 69% (95% CI: 36, 85; p-value= 0.002), and in the reduction in incidence of SARS-CoV-2 RT-PCR-positive symptomatic illness regardless of unblinding or vaccine receipt (10/3,441 versus 22/1,731, respectively) with relative risk reduction of 77% (95% CI: 52, 89 ; p-value <0.001).
Table 7 : Incidence of Symptomatic COVID-19 in Adults (PROVENT)
|
N* |
Number of events, n (%) |
Relative Risk Reduction, % (95% CI) |
| EVUSHELD† |
3,441 |
8 (0.2%) |
77% (46, 90) |
| Placebo |
1,731 |
17 (1.0%) |
N = number of subjects in analysis; CI = Confidence Interval
* subjects were censored after receiving the vaccine or being unblinded to consider the vaccine, whichever occurred earlier
† EVUSHELD dose (150 mg tixagevimab and 150 mg cilgavimab) |
Among subjects who received EVUSHELD, there were no severe/critical COVID-19 events (defined as SARS-CoV-2 RT-PCR-positive symptomatic illness characterized by a minimum of either pneumonia [fever, cough, tachypnoea or dyspnea, and lung infiltrates] or hypoxemia [SpO2 <90% in room air and/or severe respiratory distress] and a WHO Clinical Progression Scale score of 5 or higher) compared to one event (0.1%) among subjects who received placebo.
An additional data cut was conducted to provide post-hoc updated efficacy and safety analysis, the median follow-up was 6.5 months for subjects in both EVUSHELD and placebo arms. The relative risk reduction of SARS-CoV-2 RT-PCR-positive symptomatic illness was 83% (95% CI: 66, 91) with 11/3,441 (0.3%) events in the EVUSHELD arm and 31/1,731 (1.8%) events in the placebo arm, see Figure 1. These results are consistent with the duration of protection predicted by population PK modelling. Among subjects who received EVUSHELD there were no severe/critical COVID-19 events compared to five events among subjects who received placebo.
Figure 1 : Kaplan Meier: Cumulative Incidence of Symptomatic COVID-19* (PROVENT)
* Subjects who do not experience a primary endpoint event (and had not discontinued) are censored at Day 183. Subjects who were unblinded/vaccinated prior to an event are also censored at the earlier time of unblinding/vaccination.
Efficacy Data From STORM CHASER
STORM CHASER is an ongoing Phase III randomized (2:1), double-blind, placebo-controlled clinical trial of EVUSHELD for the post-exposure prophylaxis of COVID-19 in adults ≥18 years of age. Subjects who had not previously received a COVID-19 vaccine were enrolled following potential exposure (within 8 days) to an identified individual with a laboratory-confirmed SARS-CoV-2 infection (symptomatic or asymptomatic). Subjects received a single dose (administered as two IM injections) of EVUSHELD or placebo. The study excluded subjects with a history of laboratory-confirmed SARS-CoV-2 infection or SARS-CoV-2 antibody positivity at screening. Once COVID-19 vaccines were locally available, subjects were permitted on request to unblind to make an informed decision on vaccine timing and to receive COVID-19 vaccination.
Of the 1,121 subjects who were randomized and received EVUSHELD (N= 749) or placebo (N= 372), 48 subjects were positive for SARS-CoV-2 (RT-PCR analysis of nasopharyngeal swabs) at baseline.
The primary efficacy analysis, comparison of the incidence of a subject’s first case of SARS-CoV-2 RT-PCR-positive symptomatic illness occurring post-dose and before Day 183, did not demonstrate a statistically significant effect for EVUSHELD versus placebo with 23 cases of symptomatic COVID-19 in the EVUSHELD arm (3.1%) and 17 cases in the placebo arm (4.6%) (relative risk reduction of 33%, 95% CI: -26, 65). At the time of analysis the median follow-up time post-administration was 49 days (range 5 to 115 days).
The study did not demonstrate benefit for EVUSHELD in preventing symptomatic COVID-19 in the first 30 days after randomization, leading to the limitation of use for post-exposure prophylaxis [see Emergency Use Authorization]. However, there was a higher proportion of symptomatic COVID-19 cases among placebo recipients after Day 29 (see Figure 2 below, data from the post-hoc updated efficacy analysis with a median follow-up time of 6.5 months). EVUSHELD is not authorized for postexposure prophylaxis of COVID-19 in individuals who have been exposed to someone infected with SARS-CoV-2.
Figure 2 : Kaplan Meier: Cumulative Incidence of Symptomatic COVID-19* (STORM CHASER)
* Subjects who do not experience a primary endpoint event (and had not discontinued) are censored at Day 183.