WARNINGS
Included as part of the "PRECAUTIONS" Section
PRECAUTIONS
Monitoring
Laboratory Tests
In some patients, EPANOVA increases LDL-C levels. LDL-C levels should be monitored periodically during therapy with EPANOVA.
In patients with hepatic impairment, alanine aminotransferase (ALT) and aspartate aminotransferase (AST) levels should be monitored periodically during therapy with EPANOVA.
Fish Allergy
EPANOVA contains polyunsaturated free fatty acids derived from fish oils. It is not known whether patients with allergies to fish and/or shellfish, are at increased risk of an allergic reaction to EPANOVA. EPANOVA should be used with caution in patients with known hypersensitivity to fish and/or shellfish.
Patient Counseling Information
EPANOVA should be used with caution in patients with known sensitivity or allergy to fish and/or shellfish [see WARNINGS AND PRECAUTIONS].
Patients should be advised that use of lipid-regulating agents does not reduce the importance of adhering to diet [see DOSAGE AND ADMINISTRATION].
Patients should be advised not to alter EPANOVA capsules in any way and to ingest intact capsules only [see DOSAGE AND ADMINISTRATION].
Instruct patients to take EPANOVA as prescribed. If a dose is missed, patients should take it as soon as they remember. However, if they miss one day of EPANOVA, they should not double the dose when they resume taking it.
Nonclinical Toxicology
Carcinogenesis, Mutagenesis, Impairment Of Fertility
In a Sprague-Dawley rat carcinogenicity study with oral gavage doses of 100, 600, and 2,000 mg/kg/day omega-3 carboxylic acid, males were treated for 84 to 95 weeks without an increased incidence of tumors. In female rats treated for 66 to 95 weeks at 2000 mg/kg/day, an increased incidence of benign ovarian sex cord stromal tumors was observed (up to 5 times human systemic exposure following an oral dose of 4 grams/day based on a body surface area comparison). In a 6-month carcinogenicity study, Tg.rasH2 transgenic mice were treated with oral gavage doses of 500, 1000, 2000, and 4000 mg/kg/day omega-3-carboxylic acid without any increase in the incidence of tumors.
EPANOVA was not mutagenic or clastogenic with or without metabolic activation in the bacterial mutagenesis (Ames) test with Salmonella typhimurium and Escherichia coli or in the chromosomal aberration assay in Chinese hamster ovary cells. EPANOVA was negative in the in vivo rat bone marrow micronucleus assay.
In a rat fertility study with oral gavage doses of 100, 600, and 2,000 mg/kg/day, males were treated from 4 weeks prior to mating, and females were treated for 2 weeks prior to and throughout mating until day 6 of gestation. No adverse effect on male or female fertility was observed at 2,000 mg/kg/day (5 times human systemic exposure following an oral dose of 4 grams/day based on a body surface area comparison).
Use In Specific Populations
Pregnancy
Risk Summary
There are no studies with the use of EPANOVA in pregnant women and the limited available data are not sufficient to inform a drug-associated risk for major birth defects or miscarriages. In animal reproduction studies in pregnant rats, oral administration of omega-3-carboxylic acids during organogenesis at doses 5 times the human exposure of 4 grams/day did not result in adverse embryo-fetal developmental effects, but was associated with increased late fetal deaths and a higher incidence of maternal death at parturition. In animal reproduction studies in pregnant rabbits, oral administration of omega-3-carboxylic acids during organogenesis resulted in an increased incidence of minor fetal malformations and abortion at 2 times the human exposure. Adverse findings in rats and rabbits occurred primarily at doses that caused maternal toxicity [see Data].
The estimated background risk of major birth defects and miscarriage for the indicated population is unknown. All pregnancies have a background risk of birth defect, loss, or other adverse outcomes. In the U.S. general population, the estimated background risk of major birth defects and miscarriage in clinically recognized pregnancies is 2-4% and 15-20%, respectively.
Data
Animal Data
In pregnant rats given oral gavage doses of omega-3-carboxylic acids at 100, 600, and 2,000 mg/kg/day from gestation day 6 through organogenesis, late fetal deaths and fetuses with skeletal variations were observed (5 times human systemic exposure following an oral dose of 4 grams/day based on a body surface area comparison).
In pregnant rabbits given oral gavage doses of omega-3-carboxylic acids at 100, 500, and 750 mg/kg/day from gestation day 6 through organogenesis, minor skeletal malformations (rib(s) costal cartilage(s) not attached to sternum), variations in ossification, and visceral variations were observed in the fetuses in groups given ≥500 mg/kg/day (2 times human systemic exposure following an oral dose of 4 grams/day based on a body surface area comparison). At 750 mg/kg/day, several rabbits aborted and evidence of maternal toxicity was observed (4 times human systemic exposure following an oral dose of 4 grams/day based on a body surface area comparison).
In a multigenerational developmental study in pregnant rats given oral gavage doses of omega-3-carboxylic acids at 100, 600, and 2,000 mg/kg/day from gestation day 6 through lactation day 21, difficulties during and shortly after parturition led to morbidity/mortality in 9 of 24 dams given the highest dose (5 times human systemic exposure following an oral dose of 4 grams/day based on a body surface area comparison). There were no abnormalities observed in offspring (F1) from treated dams. However, survival was decreased from day 10 of lactation onward in second generation offspring (F2) from dams given 600 mg/kg/day (1.5 times the human systemic exposure following an oral dose of 4 grams/day based on a body surface area comparison).
Lactation
Risk Summary
There is no information regarding the presence of EPANOVA in human milk, the effects on the breastfed infant, or the effects on milk production. Limited published studies report that omega-3 fatty acids, derived from fish oil, are present in human milk at levels higher than that in plasma. The developmental and health benefits of breastfeeding should be considered along with the mother’s clinical need for EPANOVA and any potential adverse effects on the breastfed child from EPANOVA or from the underlying maternal condition.
Pediatric Use
Safety and effectiveness in pediatric patients have not been studied.
Geriatric Use
Clinical studies of EPANOVA did not include sufficient numbers of subjects aged 65 and over to determine whether they respond differently from younger subjects. Other reported clinical experience has not identified differences in responses between the elderly and younger patients. In general, dose selection for an elderly patient should be cautious, usually starting at the low end of the dosing range, reflecting the greater frequency of decreased hepatic, renal, or cardiac function, and of concomitant disease or other drug therapy.