CLINICAL PHARMACOLOGY
Mechanism Of Action
Apixaban is a selective
inhibitor of FXa. It does not require antithrombin III for antithrombotic
activity. Apixaban inhibits free and clot-bound FXa, and prothrombinase
activity. Apixaban has no direct effect on platelet aggregation, but indirectly
inhibits platelet aggregation induced by thrombin. By inhibiting FXa, apixaban
decreases thrombin generation and thrombus development.
Pharmacodynamics
As a result of FXa inhibition,
apixaban prolongs clotting tests such as prothrombin time (PT), INR, and
activated partial thromboplastin time (aPTT). Changes observed in these
clotting tests at the expected therapeutic dose, however, are small, subject to
a high degree of variability, and not useful in monitoring the anticoagulation
effect of apixaban.
The Rotachrom®
Heparin chromogenic assay was used to measure the effect of apixaban on FXa
activity in humans during the apixaban development program. A
concentration-dependent increase in anti-FXa activity was observed in the dose
range tested and was similar in healthy subjects and patients with AF.
This test is not recommended
for assessing the anticoagulant effect of apixaban.
Effect Of PCCs On Pharmacodynamics Of ELIQUIS
There is no clinical experience to reverse bleeding with
the use of 4-factor PCC products in individuals who have received ELIQUIS.
Effects of 4-factor PCCs on the pharmacodynamics of
apixaban were studied in healthy subjects. Following administration of apixaban
dosed to steady state, endogenous thrombin potential (ETP) returned to
pre-apixaban levels 4 hours after the initiation of a 30-minute PCC infusion,
compared to 45 hours with placebo. Mean ETP levels continued to increase and
exceeded preapixaban levels reaching a maximum (34%-51% increase over
pre-apixaban levels) at 21 hours after initiating PCC and remained elevated
(21%-27% increase) at the end of the study (69 hours after initiation of PCC).
The clinical relevance of this increase in ETP is unknown.
Pharmacodynamic Drug Interaction Studies
Pharmacodynamic drug interaction studies with aspirin,
clopidogrel, aspirin and clopidogrel, prasugrel, enoxaparin, and naproxen were
conducted. No pharmacodynamic interactions were observed with aspirin,
clopidogrel, or prasugrel [see WARNINGS AND PRECAUTIONS]. A 50% to 60%
increase in anti-FXa activity was observed when apixaban was coadministered
with enoxaparin or naproxen.
Specific Populations
Renal Impairment
Anti-FXa activity adjusted for exposure to apixaban was
similar across renal function categories.
Hepatic Impairment
Changes in anti-FXa activity were similar in patients
with mild-tomoderate hepatic impairment and healthy subjects. However, in
patients with moderate hepatic impairment, there is no clear understanding of
the impact of this degree of hepatic function impairment on the coagulation
cascade and its relationship to efficacy and bleeding. Patients with severe
hepatic impairment were not studied.
Cardiac Electrophysiology
Apixaban has no effect on the QTc interval in humans at
doses up to 50 mg.
Pharmacokinetics
Apixaban demonstrates linear pharmacokinetics with
dose-proportional increases in exposure for oral doses up to 10 mg.
Absorption
The absolute bioavailability of apixaban is approximately
50% for doses up to 10 mg of ELIQUIS. Food does not affect the bioavailability
of apixaban. Maximum concentrations (Cmax) of apixaban appear 3 to 4 hours
after oral administration of ELIQUIS. At doses ≥25 mg, apixaban displays
dissolution-limited absorption with decreased bioavailability. Following oral
administration of 10 mg of apixaban as 2 crushed 5 mg tablets suspended in 30
mL of water, exposure was similar to that after oral administration of 2 intact
5 mg tablets. Following oral administration of 10 mg of apixaban as 2 crushed 5
mg tablets mixed with 30 g of applesauce, the Cmax and AUC were 20% and 16%
lower, respectively, when compared to administration of 2 intact 5 mg tablets.
Following administration of a crushed 5 mg ELIQUIS tablet that was suspended in
60 mL D5W and delivered through a nasogastric tube, exposure was similar to
that seen in other clinical trials involving healthy volunteers receiving a
single oral 5 mg tablet dose.
Distribution
Plasma protein binding in humans is approximately 87%.
The volume of distribution (Vss) is approximately 21 liters.
Metabolism
Approximately 25% of an orally administered apixaban dose
is recovered in urine and feces as metabolites. Apixaban is metabolized mainly
via CYP3A4 with minor contributions from CYP1A2, 2C8, 2C9, 2C19, and 2J2.
O-demethylation and hydroxylation at the 3-oxopiperidinyl moiety are the major
sites of biotransformation.
Unchanged apixaban is the major drug-related component in
human plasma; there are no active circulating metabolites.
Elimination
Apixaban is eliminated in both urine and feces. Renal
excretion accounts for about 27% of total clearance. Biliary and direct
intestinal excretion contributes to elimination of apixaban in the feces.
Apixaban has a total clearance of approximately 3.3 L/hour
and an apparent half-life of approximately 12 hours following oral
administration.
Apixaban is a substrate of transport proteins: P-gp and
breast cancer resistance protein.
Drug Interaction Studies
In in vitro apixaban studies at concentrations
significantly greater than therapeutic exposures, no inhibitory effect on the
activity of CYP1A2, CYP2A6, CYP2B6, CYP2C8, CYP2C9, CYP2D6, CYP3A4/5, or
CYP2C19, nor induction effect on the activity of CYP1A2, CYP2B6, or CYP3A4/5
were observed. Therefore, apixaban is not expected to alter the metabolic
clearance of coadministered drugs that are metabolized by these enzymes.
Apixaban is not a significant inhibitor of P-gp.
The effects of coadministered drugs on the
pharmacokinetics of apixaban are summarized in Figure 2 [see also WARNINGS
AND PRECAUTIONS and DRUG INTERACTIONS].
Figure 2: Effect of Coadministered Drugs on the
Pharmacokinetics of Apixaban
In dedicated studies conducted in healthy subjects,
famotidine, atenolol, prasugrel, and enoxaparin did not meaningfully alter the
pharmacokinetics of apixaban.
In studies conducted in healthy subjects, apixaban did
not meaningfully alter the pharmacokinetics of digoxin, naproxen, atenolol,
prasugrel, or acetylsalicylic acid.
Specific Populations
The effects of level of renal impairment, age, body
weight, and level of hepatic impairment on the pharmacokinetics of apixaban are
summarized in Figure 3.
Figure 3: Effect of Specific Populations on the
Pharmacokinetics of Apixaban
* ESRD subjects treated with
intermittent hemodialysis; reported PK findings are following single dose of
apixaban post hemodialysis.
† Results reflect CrCl of 15 mL/min based on regression analysis.
‡ Dashed vertical lines illustrate pharmacokinetic changes that were used to
inform dosing recommendations.
§ No dose adjustment is recommended for nonvalvular atrial fibrillation
patients unless at least 2 of the following patient characteristics (age
greater than or equal to 80 years, body weight less than or equal to 60 kg, or
serum creatinine greater than or equal to 1.5 mg/dL) are present.
Gender
A study in healthy subjects
comparing the pharmacokinetics in males and females showed no meaningful
difference.
Race
The results across pharmacokinetic studies in normal
subjects showed no differences in apixaban pharmacokinetics among
White/Caucasian, Asian, and Black/African American subjects. No dose adjustment
is required based on race/ethnicity.
Hemodialysis In ESRD Subjects
Systemic exposure to apixaban administered as a single 5
mg dose in ESRD subjects dosed immediately after the completion of a 4-hour
hemodialysis session (post-dialysis) is 36% higher when compared to subjects
with normal renal function (Figure 3). The systemic exposure to apixaban
administered 2 hours prior to a 4-hour hemodialysis session with a dialysate
flow rate of 500 mL/min and a blood flow rate in the range of 350 to 500 mL/min
is 17% higher compared to those with normal renal function. The dialysis
clearance of apixaban is approximately 18 mL/min. The systemic exposure of
apixaban is 14% lower on dialysis when compared to not on dialysis.
Protein binding was similar (92%-94%) between healthy
controls and ESRD subjects during the on-dialysis and off-dialysis periods.
Clinical Studies
Reduction Of Risk Of Stroke And Systemic Embolism In Nonvalvular
Atrial Fibrillation
ARISTOTLE
Evidence for the efficacy and safety of ELIQUIS was
derived from ARISTOTLE, a multinational, double-blind study in patients with
nonvalvular AF comparing the effects of ELIQUIS and warfarin on the risk of
stroke and non-central nervous system (CNS) systemic embolism. In ARISTOTLE,
patients were randomized to ELIQUIS 5 mg orally twice daily (or 2.5 mg twice
daily in subjects with at least 2 of the following characteristics: age greater
than or equal to 80 years, body weight less than or equal to 60 kg, or serum
creatinine greater than or equal to 1.5 mg/dL) or to warfarin (targeted to an
INR range of 2.0-3.0). Patients had to have one or more of the following
additional risk factors for stroke:
- prior stroke or transient ischemic attack (TIA)
- prior systemic embolism
- age greater than or equal to 75 years
- arterial hypertension requiring treatment
- diabetes mellitus
- heart failure ≥New York Heart Association Class 2
- left ventricular ejection fraction ≤40%
The primary objective of ARISTOTLE was to determine
whether ELIQUIS 5 mg twice daily (or 2.5 mg twice daily) was effective
(noninferior to warfarin) in reducing the risk of stroke (ischemic or
hemorrhagic) and systemic embolism. Superiority of ELIQUIS to warfarin was also
examined for the primary endpoint (rate of stroke and systemic embolism), major
bleeding, and death from any cause.
A total of 18,201 patients were randomized and followed
on study treatment for a median of 89 weeks. Forty-three percent of patients
were vitamin K antagonist (VKA) “naive,” defined as having received ≤30
consecutive days of treatment with warfarin or another VKA before entering the
study. The mean age was 69 years and the mean CHADS2 score (a scale from 0 to 6
used to estimate risk of stroke, with higher scores predicting greater risk)
was 2.1. The population was 65% male, 83% Caucasian, 14% Asian, and 1% Black.
There was a history of stroke, TIA, or non-CNS systemic embolism in 19% of
patients. Concomitant diseases of patients in this study included hypertension
88%, diabetes 25%, congestive heart failure (or left ventricular ejection
fraction ≤40%) 35%, and prior myocardial infarction 14%. Patients treated
with warfarin in ARISTOTLE had a mean percentage of time in therapeutic range
(INR 2.0-3.0) of 62%.
ELIQUIS was superior to warfarin for the primary endpoint
of reducing the risk of stroke and systemic embolism (Table 9 and Figure 4).
Superiority to warfarin was primarily attributable to a reduction in
hemorrhagic stroke and ischemic strokes with hemorrhagic conversion compared to
warfarin. Purely ischemic strokes occurred with similar rates on both drugs.
ELIQUIS also showed significantly fewer major bleeds than
warfarin [see ADVERSE REACTIONS].
Table 9: Key Efficacy Outcomes in Patients with
Nonvalvular Atrial Fibrillation in ARISTOTLE (Intent-to-Treat Analysis)
|
ELIQUIS
N=9120 n (%/year) |
Warfarin
N=9081 n (%/year) |
Hazard Ratio P-value (95% CI) |
Stroke or systemic embolism |
212 (1.27) |
265 (1.60) |
0.79 (0.66, 0.95) 0.01 |
Stroke |
199 (1.19) |
250 (1.51) |
0.79 (0.65, 0.95) |
Ischemic without hemorrhage |
140 (0.83) |
136 (0.82) |
1.02 (0.81, 1.29) |
Ischemic with hemorrhagic conversion |
12 (0.07) |
20 (0.12) |
0.60 (0.29, 1.23) |
Hemorrhagic |
40 (0.24) |
78 (0.47) |
0.51 (0.35, 0.75) |
Unknown |
14 (0.08) |
21 (0.13) |
0.65 (0.33, 1.29) |
Systemic embolism |
15 (0.09) |
17 (0.10) |
0.87 (0.44, 1.75) |
The primary endpoint was based
on the time to first event (one per subject). Component counts are for subjects
with any event, not necessarily the first.
Figure 4: Kaplan-Meier
Estimate of Time to First Stroke or Systemic Embolism in ARISTOTLE
(Intent-to-Treat Population)
All-cause death was assessed
using a sequential testing strategy that allowed testing for superiority if
effects on earlier endpoints (stroke plus systemic embolus and major bleeding)
were demonstrated. ELIQUIS treatment resulted in a significantly lower rate of
all-cause death (p = 0.046) than did treatment with warfarin, primarily because
of a reduction in cardiovascular death, particularly stroke deaths. Non
vascular death rates were similar in the treatment arms.
In ARISTOTLE, the results for
the primary efficacy endpoint were generally consistent across most major
subgroups including weight, CHADS2 score (a scale from 0 to 6 used to predict
risk of stroke in patients with AF, with higher scores predicting greater
risk), prior warfarin use, level of renal impairment, geographic region, and
aspirin use at randomization (Figure 5).
Figure 5: Stroke and Systemic Embolism Hazard Ratios
by Baseline Characteristics – ARISTOTLE Study
Note: The figure above presents
effects in various subgroups, all of which are baseline characteristics and all
of which were prespecified, if not the groupings. The 95% confidence limits
that are shown do not take into account how many comparisons were made, nor do
they reflect the effect of a particular factor after adjustment for all other
factors. Apparent homogeneity or heterogeneity among groups should not be
over-interpreted.
At the end of the ARISTOTLE
study, warfarin patients who completed the study were generally maintained on a
VKA with no interruption of anticoagulation. ELIQUIS patients who completed the
study were generally switched to a VKA with a 2-day period of coadministration
of ELIQUIS and VKA, so that some patients may not have been adequately
anticoagulated after stopping ELIQUIS until attaining a stable and therapeutic
INR. During the 30 days following the end of the study, there were 21 stroke or
systemic embolism events in the 6791 patients (0.3%) in the ELIQUIS arm
compared to 5 in the 6569 patients (0.1%) in the warfarin arm [see DOSAGE
AND ADMINISTRATION].
AVERROES
In AVERROES, patients with nonvalvular atrial
fibrillation thought not to be candidates for warfarin therapy were randomized
to treatment with ELIQUIS 5 mg orally twice daily (or 2.5 mg twice daily in
selected patients) or aspirin 81 to 324 mg once daily. The primary objective of
the study was to determine if ELIQUIS was superior to aspirin for preventing
the composite outcome of stroke or systemic embolism. AVERROES was stopped
early on the basis of a prespecified interim analysis showing a significant
reduction in stroke and systemic embolism for ELIQUIS compared to aspirin that
was associated with a modest increase in major bleeding (Table 10) [see ADVERSE
REACTIONS].
Table 10: Key Efficacy Outcomes in Patients with
Nonvalvular Atrial Fibrillation in AVERROES
|
ELIQUIS
N=2807
n (%/year) |
Aspirin
N=2791
n (%/year) |
Hazard Ratio (95% CI) |
P-value |
Stroke or systemic embolism Stroke |
51 (1.62) |
113 (3.63) |
0.45 (0.32, 0.62) |
<0.0001 |
Ischemic or undetermined |
43 (1.37) |
97 (3.11) |
0.44 (0.31, 0.63) |
- |
Hemorrhagic |
6 (0.19) |
9 (0.28) |
0.67 (0.24, 1.88) |
- |
Systemic embolism |
2 (0.06) |
13 (0.41) |
0.15 (0.03, 0.68) |
- |
MI |
24 (0.76) |
28 (0.89) |
0.86 (0.50, 1.48) |
- |
All-cause death |
111 (3.51) |
140 (4.42) |
0.79 (0.62, 1.02) |
0.068 |
Vascular death |
84 (2.65) |
96 (3.03) |
0.87 (0.65, 1.17) |
- |
Prophylaxis Of Deep Vein
Thrombosis Following Hip Or Knee Replacement Surgery
The clinical evidence for the
effectiveness of ELIQUIS is derived from the ADVANCE-1, ADVANCE-2, and
ADVANCE-3 clinical trials in adult patients undergoing elective hip (ADVANCE-3)
or knee (ADVANCE-2 and ADVANCE-1) replacement surgery. A total of 11,659 patients
were randomized in 3 double-blind, multi-national studies. Included in this
total were 1866 patients age 75 or older, 1161 patients with low body
weight (≤60 kg), 2528 patients with Body Mass Index ≥33 kg/m², and
625 patients with severe or moderate renal impairment.
In the ADVANCE-3 study, 5407
patients undergoing elective hip replacement surgery were randomized to receive
either ELIQUIS 2.5 mg orally twice daily or enoxaparin 40 mg subcutaneously
once daily. The first dose of ELIQUIS was given 12 to 24 hours post surgery,
whereas enoxaparin was started 9 to 15 hours prior to surgery. Treatment
duration was 32 to 38 days.
In patients undergoing elective
knee replacement surgery, ELIQUIS 2.5 mg orally twice daily was compared to
enoxaparin 40 mg subcutaneously once daily (ADVANCE-2, N=3057) or enoxaparin 30
mg subcutaneously every 12 hours (ADVANCE-1, N=3195). In the ADVANCE2 study,
the first dose of ELIQUIS was given 12 to 24 hours post surgery, whereas
enoxaparin was started 9 to 15 hours prior to surgery. In the ADVANCE-1 study,
both ELIQUIS and enoxaparin were initiated 12 to 24 hours post surgery.
Treatment duration in both ADVANCE-2 and ADVANCE-1 was 10 to 14 days.
In all 3 studies, the primary
endpoint was a composite of adjudicated asymptomatic and symptomatic DVT,
nonfatal PE, and all-cause death at the end of the double-blind intended
treatment period. In ADVANCE-3 and ADVANCE-2, the primary endpoint was tested
for noninferiority, then superiority, of ELIQUIS to enoxaparin. In ADVANCE-1,
the primary endpoint was tested for noninferiority of ELIQUIS to enoxaparin.
The efficacy data are provided
in Tables 11 and 12.
Table 11: Summary of Key Efficacy Analysis Results
During the Intended Treatment Period for Patients Undergoing Elective Hip
Replacement Surgery*
Events During 35-Day Treatment Period |
ADVANCE-3 |
|
ELIQUIS 2.5 mg po bid |
Enoxaparin 40 mg sc qd |
Relative Risk (95% CI) P-value |
Number of Patients |
N=1949 |
N=1917 |
|
Total VTE†/All-cause death |
27 (1.39%) (0.95, 2.02) |
74 (3.86%) (3.08, 4.83) |
0.36 (0.22, 0.54) p<0.0001 |
Number of Patients |
N=2708 |
N=2699 |
|
All-cause death |
3 (0.11%) (0.02, 0.35) |
1 (0.04%) (0.00, 0.24) |
|
PE |
3 (0.11%) (0.02, 0.35) |
5 (0.19%) (0.07, 0.45) |
|
Symptomatic DVT |
1 (0.04%) (0.00, 0.24) |
5 (0.19%) (0.07, 0.45) |
|
Number of Patients |
N=2196 |
N=2190 |
|
Proximal DVT‡ |
7 (0.32%) (0.14, 0.68) |
20 (0.91%) (0.59, 1.42) |
|
Number of Patients |
N=1951 |
N=1908 |
|
Distal DVT‡ |
20 (1.03%) (0.66, 1.59) |
57 (2.99%) (2.31, 3.86) |
|
* Events associated with each
endpoint were counted once per subject but subjects may have contributed events
to multiple endpoints.
† Total VTE includes symptomatic and asymptomatic DVT and PE.
‡ Includes symptomatic and asymptomatic DVT. |
Table 12: Summary of Key Efficacy Analysis Results
During the Intended Treatment Period for Patients Undergoing Elective Knee
Replacement Surgery*
Events during 12-day treatment period |
ADVANCE-1 |
ADVANCE-2 |
ELIQUIS 2.5 mg po bid |
Enoxaparin 30 mg sc q12h |
Relative Risk (95% CI) P-value |
ELIQUIS 2.5 mg po bid |
Enoxaparin 40 mg sc qd |
Relative Risk (95% CI) P-value |
Number of Patients |
N=1157 |
N=1130 |
|
N=976 |
N=997 |
|
Total VTE†/All-cause death |
104 (8.99%) (7.47, 10.79) |
100 (8.85%) (7.33, 10.66) |
1.02 (0.78, 1.32) NS |
147 (15.06%) (12.95, 17.46) |
243 (24.37%) (21.81, 27.14) |
0.62 (0.51, 0.74) p<0.0001 |
Number of Patients |
N=1599 |
N=1596 |
|
N=1528 |
N=1529 |
|
All-cause death |
3 (0.19%) (0.04, 0.59) |
3 (0.19%) (0.04, 0.59) |
|
2 (0.13%) (0.01, 0.52) |
0 (0%) (0.00, 0.31) |
|
PE |
16 (1.0%) (0.61, 1.64) |
7 (0.44%) (0.20, 0.93) |
|
4 (0.26%) (0.08, 0.70) |
0 (0%) (0.00, 0.31) |
|
Symptomatic DVT |
3 (0.19%) (0.04, 0.59) |
7 (0.44%) (0.20, 0.93) |
|
3 (0.20%) (0.04, 0.61) |
7 (0.46%) (0.20, 0.97) |
|
Number of Patients |
N=1254 |
N=1207 |
|
N=1192 |
N=1199 |
|
Proximal DVT‡ |
9 (0.72%) (0.36, 1.39) |
11 (0.91%) (0.49, 1.65) |
|
9 (0.76%) (0.38, 1.46) |
26 (2.17%) (1.47, 3.18) |
|
Number of Patients |
N=1146 |
N=1133 |
|
N=978 |
N=1000 |
|
Distal DVT‡ |
83 (7.24%) (5.88, 8.91) |
91 (8.03%) (6.58, 9.78) |
|
142 (14.52%) (12.45, 16.88) |
239 (23.9%) (21.36, 26.65) |
|
* Events associated with each
endpoint were counted once per subject but subjects may have contributed events
to multiple endpoints.
† Total VTE includes symptomatic and asymptomatic DVT and PE.
‡ Includes symptomatic and asymptomatic DVT. |
The efficacy profile of ELIQUIS
was generally consistent across subgroups of interest for this indication
(e.g., age, gender, race, body weight, renal impairment).
Treatment Of DVT And PE And Reduction
In The Risk Of Recurrence Of DVT And PE
Efficacy and safety of ELIQUIS for the treatment of DVT
and PE, and for the reduction in the risk of recurrent DVT and PE following 6
to 12 months of anticoagulant treatment was derived from the AMPLIFY and
AMPLIFY-EXT studies. Both studies were randomized, parallel-group, double-blind
trials in patients with symptomatic proximal DVT and/or symptomatic PE. All key
safety and efficacy endpoints were adjudicated in a
blinded manner by an independent committee.
AMPLIFY
The primary objective of
AMPLIFY was to determine whether ELIQUIS was noninferior to enoxaparin/warfarin
for the incidence of recurrent VTE (venous thromboembolism) or VTE-related
death. Patients with an objectively confirmed symptomatic DVT and/or PE were
randomized to treatment with ELIQUIS 10 mg twice daily orally for 7 days
followed by ELIQUIS 5 mg twice daily orally for 6 months, or enoxaparin 1 mg/kg
twice daily subcutaneously for at least 5 days (until INR ≥2) followed by
warfarin (target INR range 2.0-3.0) orally for 6 months. Patients who required
thrombectomy, insertion of a caval filter, or use of a fibrinolytic agent, and
patients with creatinine clearance <25 mL/min, significant liver disease, an
existing heart valve or atrial fibrillation, or active bleeding were excluded
from the AMPLIFY study. Patients were allowed to enter the study with or
without prior parenteral anticoagulation (up to 48 hours).
A total of 5244 patients were
evaluable for efficacy and were followed for a mean of 154 days in the ELIQUIS
group and 152 days in the enoxaparin/warfarin group. The mean age was 57 years.
The AMPLIFY study population was 59% male, 83% Caucasian, 8% Asian, and 4%
Black. For patients randomized to warfarin, the mean percentage of time in
therapeutic range (INR 2.0-3.0) was 60.9%.
Approximately 90% of patients
enrolled in AMPLIFY had an unprovoked DVT or PE at baseline. The remaining 10%
of patients with a provoked DVT or PE were required to have an additional
ongoing risk factor in order to be randomized, which included previous episode
of DVT or PE, immobilization, history of cancer, active cancer, and known
prothrombotic genotype.
ELIQUIS was shown to be
noninferior to enoxaparin/warfarin in the AMPLIFY study for the primary
endpoint of recurrent symptomatic VTE (nonfatal DVT or nonfatal PE) or
VTE-related death over 6 months of therapy (Table 13).
Table 13: Efficacy Results in the AMPLIFY Study
|
ELIQUIS
N=2609 n |
Enoxaparin/ Warfarin
N=2635 n |
Relative Risk (95% CI) |
VTE or VTE-related death* |
59 (2.3%) |
71 (2.7%) |
0.84 (0.60, 1.18) |
DVT† |
22 (0.8%) |
35 (1.3%) |
|
PE† |
27 (1.0%) |
25 (0.9%) |
|
VTE-related death† |
12 (0.4%) |
16 (0.6%) |
|
VTE or all-cause death |
84 (3.2%) |
104 (4.0%) |
0.82 (0.61, 1.08) |
VTE or CV-related death |
61 (2.3%) |
77 (2.9%) |
0.80 (0.57, 1.11) |
* Noninferior compared to
enoxaparin/warfarin (P-value <0.0001).
† Events associated with each endpoint were counted once per subject, but
subjects may have contributed events to multiple endpoints. |
In the AMPLIFY study, patients
were stratified according to their index event of PE (with or without DVT) or
DVT (without PE). Efficacy in the initial treatment of VTE was consistent
between the two subgroups.
AMPLIFY-EXT
Patients who had been treated
for DVT and/or PE for 6 to 12 months with anticoagulant therapy without having
a recurrent event were randomized to treatment with ELIQUIS 2.5 mg orally twice
daily, ELIQUIS 5 mg orally twice daily, or placebo for 12 months. Approximately
one-third of patients participated in the AMPLIFY study prior to enrollment in
the AMPLIFY-EXT study.
A total of 2482 patients were
randomized to study treatment and were followed for a mean of approximately 330
days in the ELIQUIS group and 312 days in the placebo group. The mean age in
the AMPLIFY-EXT study was 57 years. The study population was 57% male, 85%
Caucasian, 5% Asian, and 3% Black.
The AMPLIFY-EXT study enrolled
patients with either an unprovoked DVT or PE at baseline (approximately 92%) or
patients with a provoked baseline event and one additional risk factor for
recurrence (approximately 8%). However, patients who had experienced multiple
episodes of unprovoked DVT or PE were excluded from the AMPLIFY-EXT study. In
the AMPLIFY-EXT study, both doses of ELIQUIS were superior to placebo in the
primary endpoint of symptomatic, recurrent VTE (nonfatal DVT or nonfatal PE),
or all-cause death (Table 14).
Table 14: Efficacy Results in the AMPLIFY-EXT Study
|
ELIQUIS 2.5 mg bid
N=840 |
ELIQUIS 5 mg bid
N=813 |
Placebo
N=829 |
Relative Risk (95% CI) |
ELIQUIS 2.5 mg bid vs Placebo |
ELIQUIS 5 mg bid vs Placebo |
n (%) |
|
Recurrent VTE or |
32 (3.8) |
34 (4.2) |
96 (11.6) |
0.33 (0.22, 0.48) |
0.36 (0.25, 0.53) |
all-cause death |
|
|
|
p<0.0001 |
p<0.0001 |
DVT* |
19 (2.3) |
28 (3.4) |
72 (8.7) |
|
|
PE* |
23 (2.7) |
25 (3.1) |
37 (4.5) |
|
|
All-cause death |
22 (2.6) |
25 (3.1) |
33 (4.0) |
|
|
* Patients with more than one
event are counted in multiple rows. |