CLINICAL PHARMACOLOGY
Mechanism Of Action
Rilpivirine is an antiviral drug [see Microbiology].
Pharmacodynamics
Effects On Electrocardiogram
The effect of EDURANT at the recommended dose of 25 mg
once daily on the QTcF interval was evaluated in a randomized, placebo and
active (moxifloxacin 400 mg once daily) controlled crossover study in 60
healthy adults, with 13 measurements over 24 hours at steady state. The maximum
mean time-matched (95% upper confidence bound) differences in QTcF interval
from placebo after baseline-correction was 2.0 (5.0) milliseconds (i.e., below
the threshold of clinical concern).
When doses of 75 mg once daily and 300 mg once daily of
EDURANT (3 times and 12 times the dose in EDURANT) were studied in healthy
adults, the maximum mean time-matched (95% upper confidence bound) differences
in QTcF interval from placebo after baseline-correction were 10.7 (15.3) and
23.3 (28.4) milliseconds, respectively. Steady-state administration of EDURANT
75 mg once daily and 300 mg once daily resulted in a mean steady-state Cmax approximately
2.6-fold and 6.7-fold, respectively, higher than the mean Cmax observed with
the recommended 25 mg once daily dose of EDURANT [see WARNINGS AND
PRECAUTIONS].
Pharmacokinetics
Pharmacokinetics In Adults
The pharmacokinetic properties of rilpivirine have been
evaluated in adult healthy subjects and in adult antiretroviral treatment-Naive
HIV-1-infected subjects. Exposure to rilpivirine was generally lower in HIV-1
infected subjects than in healthy subjects.
Table 6: Population Pharmacokinetic Estimates of
Rilpivirine 25 mg once daily in Antiretroviral Treatment-Naive HIV-1-Infected
Adult Subjects (Pooled Data from Phase 3 Trials through Week 96)
Parameter |
Rilpivirine 25 mg once daily
N = 679 |
AUC24h (ng•h/mL) |
Mean ± Standard Deviation |
2235 ± 851 |
Median (Range) |
2096 (198 - 7307) |
Ch (ng/mL) |
Mean ± Standard Deviation |
79 ± 35 |
Median (Range) |
73 (2 - 288) |
Absorption And Bioavailability
After oral administration, the maximum plasma
concentration of rilpivirine is generally achieved within 4-5 hours. The
absolute bioavailability of EDURANT is unknown.
Effects Of Food On Oral Absorption
The exposure to rilpivirine was approximately 40% lower
when EDURANT was taken in a fasted condition as compared to a normal caloric
meal (533 kcal) or high-fat high-caloric meal (928 kcal). When EDURANT was
taken with only a protein-rich nutritional drink, exposures were 50% lower than
when taken with a meal.
Distribution
Rilpivirine is approximately 99.7% bound to plasma
proteins in vitro, primarily to albumin. The distribution of rilpivirine into
compartments other than plasma (e.g., cerebrospinal fluid, genital tract
secretions) has not been evaluated in humans.
Metabolism
In vitro experiments indicate that rilpivirine primarily
undergoes oxidative metabolism mediated by the cytochrome P450 (CYP) 3A system.
Elimination
The terminal elimination half-life of rilpivirine is approximately
50 hours. After single dose oral administration of 14C-rilpivirine,
on average 85% and 6.1% of the radioactivity could be retrieved in feces and
urine, respectively. In feces, unchanged rilpivirine accounted for on average
25% of the administered dose. Only trace amounts of unchanged rilpivirine (<
1% of dose) were detected in urine.
Special Populations
Pregnancy And Postpartum
The exposure (C0h and AUC24h) to total rilpivirine after
intake of rilpivirine 25 mg once daily as part of an antiretroviral regimen was
30 to 40% lower during pregnancy (similar for the second and third trimester),
compared with postpartum (see Table 7). However, the exposure during pregnancy
was not significantly different from exposures obtained in Phase 3 trials. Based
on the exposure-response relationship for rilpivirine, this decrease is not
considered clinically relevant in patients who are virollogically suppressed.
The protein binding of rilpivirine was similar (>99%) during the second
trimester, third trimester, and postpartum.
Table 7: Pharmacokinetic Results of Total Rilpivirine
After Administration of Rilpivirine 25 mg Once Daily as Part of an
Antiretroviral Regimen, During the 2nd Trimester of Pregnancy,
the 3rd Trimester of Pregnancy and Postpartum
Pharmacokinetics of total rilpivirine (mean ± SD, tmax : median [range]) |
Postpartum (6-12 Weeks)
(n=11) |
2nd Trimester of pregnancy
(n=15) |
3rd Trimester of pregnancy
(n=13) |
Ch, ng/mL |
111 ± 69.2 |
65.0 ± 23.9 |
63.5 ± 26.2 |
Cmin , ng/mL |
84.0 ± 58.8 |
54.3 ± 25.8 |
52.9 ± 24.4 |
Cmax , ng/mL |
167±101 |
121 ±45.9 |
123 ± 47.5 |
tmax , h |
4.00
(2.03-25.08) |
4.00
(1.00-9.00) |
4.00
(2.00-24.93) |
AUC24h, ng•h/mL |
2714 ± 1535 |
1792 ± 711 |
1762 ± 662 |
Pediatric Patients
The pharmacokinetics of rilpivirine in antiretroviral
treatment-Naive HIV-1 infected pediatric subjects 12 to less than 18 years of
age receiving EDURANT 25 mg once daily were comparable to those in
treatment-Naive HIV-1 infected adults receiving EDURANT 25 mg once daily. There
was no clinically significant impact of body weight on rilpivirine
pharmacokinetics in pediatric subjects in trial C213 (33 to 93 kg).
Table 8: Population Pharmacokinetic Estimates of
Rilpivirine 25 mg once daily in Antiretroviral Treatment-Naive HIV-1-Infected
Pediatric Subjects aged 12 to less than 18 years (Data from Phase 2 Trial
through Week 48)
Parameter |
Rilpivirine 25 mg once daily
N = 34 |
AUC24h (ng•h/mL) |
Mean ± Standard Deviation |
2424 ±1024 |
Median (Range) |
2269 (417 -5166) |
C0h (ng/mL) |
Mean ± Standard Deviation |
85 ± 40 |
Median (Range) |
79 (7 - 202) |
The pharmacokinetics and dosing recommendations of
rilpivirine in pediatric patients who are less than 12 years of age and less
than 35 kg have not been established [see Use In Specific Populations].
Renal Impairment
Population pharmacokinetic analysis indicated that
rilpivirine exposure was similar in HIV-1 infected subjects with mild renal
impairment relative to HIV-1 infected subjects with normal renal function. No
dose adjustment is required in patients with mild renal impairment. There is
limited or no information regarding the pharmacokinetics of rilpivirine in
patients with moderate or severe renal impairment or in patients with end-stage
renal disease, and rilpivirine concentrations may be increased due to alteration
of drug absorption, distribution, and metabolism secondary to renal
dysfunction. The potential impact is not expected to be of clinical relevance
for HIV-1-infected subjects with moderate renal impairment, and no dose
adjustment is required in these patients. Rilpivirine should be used with
caution and with increased monitoring for adverse effects in patients with
severe renal impairment or end-stage renal disease. As rilpivirine is highly
bound to plasma proteins, it is unlikely that it will be significantly removed
by hemodialysis or peritoneal dialysis [see Use In Specific Populations].
Hepatic Impairment
Rilpivirine is primarily metabolized and eliminated by
the liver. In a study comparing 8 subjects with mild hepatic impairment
(Child-Pugh score A) to 8 matched controls, and 8 subjects with moderate
hepatic impairment (Child-Pugh score B) to 8 matched controls, the multiple
dose exposure of rilpivirine was 47% higher in subjects with mild hepatic
impairment and 5% higher in subjects with moderate hepatic impairment. EDURANT
has not been studied in subjects with severe hepatic impairment (Child-Pugh
score C) [see Use In Specific Populations].
Gender, Race, Hepatitis B And/Or Hepatitis C Virus
Co-infection
No clinically relevant differences in the
pharmacokinetics of rilpivirine have been observed between gender, race and
patients with hepatitis B and/or C-virus co-infection.
Drug Interactions
[see CONTRAINDICATIONS and DRUG INTERACTIONS]
Rilpivirine is primarily metabolized by cytochrome P450
(CYP)3A, and drugs that induce or inhibit CYP3A may thus affect the clearance
of rilpivirine. Coadministration of EDURANT and drugs that induce CYP3A may
result in decreased plasma concentrations of rilpivirine and loss of virologic
response and possible resistance. Coadministration of EDURANT and drugs that
inhibit CYP3A may result in increased plasma concentrations of rilpivirine.
Coadministration of EDURANT with drugs that increase gastric pH may result in
decreased plasma concentrations of rilpivirine and loss of virologic response
and possible resistance to rilpivirine and to the class of NNRTIs.
EDURANT at a dose of 25 mg once daily is not likely to
have a clinically relevant effect on the exposure of medicinal products
metabolised by CYP enzymes.
Drug interaction studies were performed with EDURANT and
other drugs likely to be coadministered or commonly used as probes for
pharmacokinetic interactions. The effects of coadministration of other drugs on
the Cmax, AUC, and Cmin values of rilpivirine are summarized in Table 9 (effect
of other drugs on EDURANT). The effect of coadministration of EDURANT on the Cmax,
AUC, and Cmin values of other drugs are summarized in Table 10 (effect of
EDURANT on other drugs). [For information regarding clinical recommendations, see
DRUG INTERACTIONS]
Table 9: Drug Interactions: Pharmacokinetic Parameters
for Rilpivirine in the Presence of Coadministered Drugs
Coadministered Drug |
Dose/Schedule |
N |
Mean Ratio of Rilpivirine Pharmacokinetic Parameters With/Without Coadministered Drug (90% CI); No Effect = 1.00 |
Coadministered Drug |
Rilpivirine |
C max |
AUC |
C min |
CoAdministration With HIV Protease Inhibitors (PIs) |
Darunavir/ ritonavir |
800/100 mg q.d. |
150 mg q.d.† |
14 |
1.79
(1.56-2.06) |
2.30 (1.98-2.67) |
2.78 (2.39-3.24) |
Lopinavir/ ritonavir (soft gel capsule) |
400/100 mg b.i.d. |
150 mg q.d.† |
15 |
1.29
(1.18-1.40) |
1.52 (1.36-1.70) |
1.74 (1.46-2.08) |
CoAdministration With HIV Nucleoside or Nucleotide Reverse Transcriptase Inhibitors (NRTIs/N[t]RTIs) |
Didanosine |
400 mg q.d. delayed release capsules taken 2 hours before rilpivirine |
150 mg q.d.† |
21 |
1.00 (0.90-1.10) |
1.00 (0.95-1.06) |
1.00 (0.92-1.09) |
Tenofovir disoproxil fumarate |
300 mg q.d. |
150 mg q.d.† |
16 |
0.96 (0.81-1.13) |
1.01 (0.87-1.18) |
0.99 (0.83-1.16) |
CoAdministration With HIV Integrase Strand Transfer Inhibitors |
Raltegravir |
400 mg b.i.d. |
25 mg q.d. |
23 |
1.12 (1.04-1.20) |
1.12 (1.05-1.19) |
1.03 (0.96-1.12) |
CoAdministration With other Antivirals |
Telaprevir |
750 mg q8h |
25 mg q.d. |
16 |
1.49 (1.20-1.84) |
1.78 (1.44-2.20) |
1.93 (1.55-2.41) |
CoAdministration With Drugs other than Antiretrovirals |
Acetaminophen |
500 mg single dose |
150 mg q.d.† |
16 |
1.09 (1.01-1.18) |
1.16 (1.10-1.22) |
1.26 (1.16-1.38) |
Atorvastatin |
40 mg q.d. |
150 mg q.d.† |
16 |
0.91 (0.79-1.06) |
0.90 (0.81-0.99) |
0.90 (0.84-0.96) |
Chlorzoxazone |
500 mg single dose taken 2 hours after rilpivirine |
150 mg q.d.† |
16 |
1.17 (1.08-1.27) |
1.25 (1.16-1.35) |
1.18 (1.09-1.28) |
Ethinylestradiol/ Norethindrone |
0.035 mg q.d./ 1 mg q.d. |
25 mg q.d. |
15 |
↔* |
↔* |
↔* |
Famotidine |
40 mg single dose taken 12 hours before rilpivirine |
150 mg single dose† |
24 |
0.99 (0.84-1.16) |
0.91 (0.78-1.07) |
N.A. |
Famotidine |
40 mg single dose taken 2 hours before rilpivirine |
150 mg single dose† |
23 |
0.15 (0.12-0.19) |
0.24 (0.20-0.28) |
N.A. |
Famotidine |
40 mg single dose taken 4 hours after rilpivirine |
150 mg single dose† |
24 |
1.21 (1.06-1.39) |
1.13 (1.01-1.27) |
N.A. |
Ketoconazole |
400 mg q.d. |
150 mg q.d.† |
15 |
1.30 (1.13-1.48) |
1.49 (1.31-1.70) |
1.76 (1.57-1.97) |
Methadone |
60-100 mg q.d., individualised dose |
25 mg q.d. |
12 |
↔* |
↔* |
↔* |
Omeprazole |
20 mg q.d. |
150 mg q.d.† |
16 |
0.60 (0.48-0.73) |
0.60 (0.51-0.71) |
0.67 (0.58-0.78) |
Rifabutin |
300 mg q.d. |
25 mg q.d. |
18 |
0.69 (0.62-0.76) |
0.58 (0.52-0.65) |
0.52 (0.46-0.59) |
Rifabutin |
300 mg q.d. |
50 mg q.d. |
18 |
1.43 (1.30-1.56) |
1.16 (1.06-1.26) |
0.93 (0.85-1.01) |
(reference arm for comparison was 25 mg q.d. rilpivirine administered alone) |
Rifampin |
600 mg q.d. |
150 mg q.d.† |
16 |
0.31 (0.27-0.36) |
0.20 (0.18-0.23) |
0.11 (0.10-0.13) |
Sildenafil |
50 mg single dose |
75 mg q.d.† |
16 |
0.92 (0.85-0.99) |
0.98 (0.92-1.05) |
1.04 (0.98-1.09) |
CI = Confidence Interval; N = maximum number of subjects
with data; N.A. = not available; ↑ = increase;
↓ = decrease; ↔ = no change; q.d. = once daily; b.i.d. = twice
daily
* comparison based on historic controls
† This interaction study has been performed with a dose higher than the
recommended dose for EDURANT (25 mg once daily) assessing the maximal effect on
the coadministered drug. |
Table 10: Drug Interactions: Pharmacokinetic
Parameters for Coadministered Drugs in the Presence of EDURANT
Coadministered Drug |
Dose/Schedule |
N |
Mean Ratio of Coadministered Drug Pharmacokinetic Parameters With/Without EDURANT (90% CI); No Effect = 1.00 |
Coadministered Drug |
Rilpivirine |
Cmax |
AUC |
Cmin |
CoAdministration With HIV Protease Inhibitors (PIs) |
Darunavir/ ritonavir |
800/100 mg q.d. |
150 mg q.d.† |
15 |
0.90 (0.81-1.00) |
0.89 (0.81-0.99) |
0.89 (0.68-1.16) |
Lopinavir/ ritonavir (soft gel capsule) |
400/100 mg b.i.d. |
150 mg q.d.† |
15 |
0.96 (0.88-1.05) |
0.99 (0.89-1.10) |
0.89 (0.73-1.08) |
CoAdministration With HIV Nucleoside or Nucleotide Reverse Transcriptase Inhibitors (NRTIs/N[t]RTIs) |
Didanosine |
400 mg q.d. delayed release capsules taken 2 hours before rilpivirine |
150 mg q.d.† |
13 |
0.96 (0.80-1.14) |
1.12 (0.99-1.27) |
N.A. |
Tenofovir disoproxil fumarate |
300 mg q.d. |
150 mg q.d.† |
16 |
1.19 (1.06-1.34) |
1.23 (1.16-1.31) |
1.24 (1.10-1.38) |
CoAdministration With HIV Integrase Strand Transfer Inhibitors |
Raltegravir |
400 mg b.i.d. |
25 mg q.d. |
23 |
1.10 (0.77-1.58) |
1.09 (0.81-1.47) |
1.27 (1.01-1.60) |
CoAdministration With other Antivirals |
Telaprevir |
750 mg q8h |
25 mg q.d. |
13 |
0.97 (0.79-1.21) |
0.95 (0.76-1.18) |
0.89 (0.67-1.18) |
CoAdministration With Drugs other than Antiretrovirals |
Acetaminophen |
500 mg single dose |
150 mg q.d.† |
16 |
0.97 (0.86-1.10) |
0.91 (0.86-0.97) |
N.A. |
Atorvastatin |
40 mg q.d. |
150 mg q.d.† |
16 |
1.35 (1.08-1.68) |
1.04 (0.97-1.12) |
0.85 (0.69-1.03) |
2-hydroxy-atorvastatin |
|
|
16 |
1.58 (1.33-1.87) |
1.39 (1.29-1.50) |
1.32 (1.10-1.58) |
4-hydroxy-atorvastatin |
|
|
16 |
1.28 (1.15-1.43) |
1.23 (1.13-1.33) |
N.A. |
Chlorzoxazone |
500 mg single dose taken 2 hours after rilpivirine |
150 mg q.d.† |
16 |
0.98 (0.85-1.13) |
1.03 (0.95-1.13) |
N.A. |
Digoxin |
0.5 mg single dose |
25 mg q.d. |
22 |
1.06 (0.97-1.17) |
0.98 (0.93-1.04)# |
N.A. |
Ethinylestradiol |
0.035 mg q.d. |
25 mg q.d. |
17 |
1.17 (1.06-1.30) |
1.14 (1.10-1.19) |
1.09 (1.03-1.16) |
Norethindrone |
1 mg q.d. |
|
17 |
0.94 (0.83-1.06) |
0.89 (0.84-0.94) |
0.99 (0.90-1.08) |
Ketoconazole |
400 mg q.d. |
150 mg q.d.† |
14 |
0.85 (0.80-0.90) |
0.76 (0.70-0.82) |
0.34 (0.25-0.46) |
R(-) methadone |
60-100 mg q.d., individualised dose |
25 mg q.d. |
13 |
0.86 (0.78-0.95) |
0.84 (0.74-0.95) |
0.78 (0.67-0.91) |
S(+) methadone |
|
|
13 |
0.87 (0.78-0.97) |
0.84 (0.74-0.96) |
0.79 (0.67-0.92) |
Metformin |
850 mg single dose |
25 mg q.d. |
20 |
1.02 (0.95-1.10) |
0.97 (0.90-1.06)A |
N.A. |
Omeprazole |
20 mg q.d. |
150 mg q.d.† |
15 |
0.86 (0.68-1.09) |
0.86 (0.76-0.97) |
N.A. |
Rifampin |
600 mg q.d. |
150 mg q.d.† |
16 |
1.02 (0.93-1.12) |
0.99 (0.92-1.07) |
N.A. |
25-desacetylrifampin |
|
|
16 |
1.00 (0.87-1.15) |
0.91 (0.77-1.07) |
N.A. |
Sildenafil |
50 mg single dose |
75 mg q.d.† |
16 |
0.93 (0.80-1.08) |
0.97 (0.87-1.08) |
N.A. |
N-desmethyl-sildenafil |
|
|
16 |
0.90 (0.80-1.02) |
0.92 (0.85-0.99)# |
N.A. |
CI = Confidence Interval; N = maximum number of subjects
with data; N.A. = not available; ↑ = increase;
↓ = decrease; ↔ = no change; q.d. = once daily; b.i.d. = twice
daily
† This interaction study has been performed with a dose higher than the
recommended dose for EDURANT (25 mg once daily) assessing the maximal effect on
the coadministered drug.
# AUC(0-last)
^ N (maximum number of subjects with data) for AUC(0-∞) = 15 |
Microbiology
Mechanism Of Action
Rilpivirine is a diarylpyrimidine non-nucleoside reverse
transcriptase inhibitor (NNRTI) of human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1)
and inhibits HIV-1 replication by non-competitive inhibition of HIV-1 reverse
transcriptase (RT). Rilpivirine does not inhibit the human cellular DNA
polymerases α, β andγ.
Antiviral Activity In Cell Culture
Rilpivirine exhibited activity against laboratory strains
of wild-type HIV-1 in an acutely infected T-cell line with a median EC50 value
for HIV-1IIIB of 0.73 nM (0.27 ng/mL). Rilpivirine demonstrated limited
activity in cell culture against HIV-2 with a median EC50 value of 5220 nM
(range 2510 to 10830 nM) (920 to 3970 ng/mL).
Rilpivirine demonstrated antiviral activity against a
broad panel of HIV-1 group M (subtype A, B, C, D, F, G, H) primary isolates
with EC50 values ranging from 0.07 to 1.01 nM (0.03 to 0.37 ng/mL) and was less
active against group O primary isolates with EC50 values ranging from 2.88 to
8.45 nM (1.06 to 3.10 ng/mL).
The antiviral activity of rilpivirine was not
antagonistic when combined with the NNRTIs efavirenz, etravirine or nevirapine;
the N(t)RTIs abacavir, didanosine, emtricitabine, lamivudine, stavudine,
tenofovir or zidovudine; the PIs amprenavir, atazanavir, darunavir, indinavir, lopinavir,
nelfinavir, ritonavir, saquinavir or tipranavir; the fusion inhibitor
enfuvirtide; the CCR5 co-receptor antagonist maraviroc, or the integrase strand
transfer inhibitor raltegravir.
Resistance
In Cell Culture
Rilpivirine-resistant strains were selected in cell
culture starting from wild-type HIV-1 of different origins and subtypes as well
as NNRTI resistant HIV-1. The frequently observed amino acid substitutions that
emerged and conferred decreased phenotypic susceptibility to rilpivirine
included: L100I, K101E, V106I and A, V108I, E138K and G, Q, R, V179F and I,
Y181C and I, V189I, G190E, H221Y, F227C and M230I and L.
In Treatment-Naive Adult Subjects
In the Week 96 pooled resistance analysis of the Phase 3
trials C209 and C215, the emergence of resistance was greater among subjects'
viruses in the EDURANT arm compared to the efavirenz arm, and was dependent on
baseline viral load. In the pooled resistance analysis, 58% (57/98) of the
subjects who qualified for resistance analysis (resistance analysis subjects)
in the EDURANT arm had virus with genotypic and/or phenotypic resistance to
rilpivirine compared to 45% (25/56) of the resistance analysis subjects in the
efavirenz arm who had genotypic and/or phenotypic resistance to efavirenz.
Moreover, genotypic and/or phenotypic resistance to a background drug
(emtricitabine, lamivudine, tenofovir, abacavir or zidovudine) emerged in
viruses from 52% (51/98) of the resistance analysis subjects in the rilpivirine
arm compared to 23% (13/56) in the efavirenz arm.
Emerging NNRTI substitutions in the rilpivirine
resistance analysis of subjects' viruses included V90I, K101E/P/T, E138K/A/Q/G,
V179I/L, Y181C/I, V189I, H221Y, F227C/L and M230L, which were associated with a
rilpivirine phenotypic fold change range of 2.6 -621. The E138K substitution
emerged most frequently during rilpivirine treatment commonly in combination
with the M184I substitution. The emtricitabine and lamivudine
resistance-associated substitutions M184I or V and NRTI resistance-associated
substitutions (K65R/N, A62V, D67N/G, K70E, Y115F, T215S/T, or K219E/R) emerged
more frequently in rilpivirine resistance analysis subjects compared to
efavirenz resistance analysis subjects (see Table 11).
NNRTI-and NRTI-resistance substitutions emerged less
frequently in resistance analysis of viruses from subjects with baseline viral
load of ≤ 100,000 copies/mL compared to viruses from subjects with
baseline viral load of > 100,000 copies/mL: 26% (14/54) compared to 74%
(40/54) of NNRTI-resistance substitutions and 22% (11/50) compared to 78%
(39/50) of NRTI-resistance substitutions. This difference was also observed for
the individual emtricitabine/lamivudine and tenofovir resistance substitutions:
23% (11/47) compared to 77% (36/47) for M184I/V and 0% (0/8) compared to 100%
(8/8) for K65R/N. Additionally, NNRTI-and NRTI-resistance substitutions emerged
less frequently in the resistance analysis of viruses from subjects with
baseline CD4+ cell counts ≥ 200 cells/mm³ compared to viruses from
subjects with baseline CD4+ cell counts < 200 cells/mm³: 37% (20/54)
compared to 63% (34/54) of NNRTI-resistance substitutions and 28% (14/50)
compared to 72% (36/50) of NRTI-resistance substitutions.
Table 11: Proportion of Resistance Analysis Subjects*
with Frequently Emerging Reverse Transcriptase Substitutions from the Pooled
Phase 3 TMC278-C209 and TMC278-C215 Trials in the Week 96 Analysis
|
C209 and C215
N = 1368 |
EDURANT + BR
N = 686 |
Efavirenz + BR
N = 682 |
Subjects who Qualified for Resistance Analysis |
15% (98/652) |
9% (56/604) |
Subjects with Evaluable Post-Baseline Resistance Data |
87 |
43 |
Emerging NNRTI Substitutions† |
Any |
62% (54/87) |
53% (23/43) |
V90I |
13% (11/87) |
2% (1/43) |
K101E/P/T/Q |
20% (17/87) |
9% (4/43) |
K103N |
1% (1/87) |
40% (17/43) |
E138K/A/Q/G |
40% (35/87) |
2% (1/43) |
E138K+ M184It |
25% (22/87) |
0 |
V179I/L/D |
6% (5/87) |
7% (3/43) |
Y181C/I/S |
10% (9/87) |
2% (1/43) |
V189I |
8% (7/87) |
2% (1/43) |
H221Y |
9% (8/87) |
0 |
Emerging NRTI Substitutions§ |
Any |
57% (50/87) |
30% (13/43) |
M184I/V |
54% (47/87) |
26% (11/43) |
K65R/N |
9% (8/87) |
5% (2/43) |
A62V, D67N/G, K70E, Y115F, T215S/T or K219E/R1 |
21% (18/87) |
2% (1/43) |
BR = background regimen
* Subjects who qualified for resistance analysis.
† V90, L100, K101, K103, V106, V108, E138, V179, Y181, Y188, V189, G190, H221,
P225, F227 or M230
‡ This combination of NNRTI and NRTI substitutions is a subset of those with
the E138K.
§ A62V, K65R/N, D67N/G, K70E, L74I, V75I, Y115F, M184I/V, L210F, T215S/T,
K219E/R
¶ These substitutions emerged in addition to the primary substitutions M184V/I
or K65R/N; A62V (n=3), D67N/G (n=3), K70E (n=4), Y115F (n=2), T215S/T (n=1),
K219E/R (n=8) in rilpivirine resistance analysis subjects. |
Cross-Resistance
Site-Directed NNRTI Mutant Virus
Cross-resistance has been observed among NNRTIs. The
single NNRTI substitutions K101P, Y181I and Y181V conferred 52-fold, 15-fold
and 12-fold decreased susceptibility to rilpivirine, respectively. The
combination of E138K and M184I showed 6.7-fold reduced susceptibility to
rilpivirine compared to 2.8-fold for E138K alone. The K103N substitution did
not result in reduced susceptibility to rilpivirine by itself. However, the
combination of K103N and L100I resulted in a 7-fold reduced susceptibility to
rilpivirine. Combinations of 2 or 3 NNRTI resistance-associated substitutions
had decreased susceptibility to rilpivirine (fold change range of 3.7 -554) in
38% and 66% of mutants analyzed, respectively.
Treatment-Naive HIV-1-Infected Adult Subjects
Considering all available cell culture and clinical data,
any of the following amino acid substitutions, when present at baseline, are
likely to decrease the antiviral activity of rilpivirine: K101E, K101P, E138A,
E138G, E138K, E138R, E138Q, V179L, Y181C, Y181I, Y181V, Y188L, H221Y, F227C,
M230I or M230L.
Cross-resistance to efavirenz, etravirine and/or
nevirapine is likely after virologic failure and development of rilpivirine
resistance. In the Week 96 pooled analyses of the Phase 3 TMC278-C209 and
TMC278-C215 clinical trials, 50 of the 87 (57%) rilpivirine resistance analysis
subjects with post-baseline resistance data had virus with decreased
susceptibility to rilpivirine (≥ 2.5-fold change). Of these, 86% (n=
43/50) were resistant to efavirenz (≥ 3.3-fold change), 90% (n= 45/50)
were resistant to etravirine (≥ 3.2-fold change) and 62% (n= 31/50) were
resistant to nevirapine (≥ 6-fold change). In the efavirenz arm, 3 of the
21 (14%) efavirenz resistance analysis subjects' viruses were resistant to
etravirine and rilpivirine, and 95% (n= 20/21) were resistant to nevirapine.
Virus from subjects experiencing virologic failure on EDURANT developed more
NNRTI resistance-associated substitutions conferring more cross-resistance to
the NNRTI class and had a higher likelihood of cross-resistance to all NNRTIs
in the class compared to virus from subjects who failed on efavirenz.
Clinical Studies
Treatment-Naive Adult Subjects
The evidence of efficacy of EDURANT is based on the
analyses of 48-and 96-week data from 2 randomized, double-blinded, active
controlled, Phase 3 trials TMC278-C209 (ECHO) and TMC278-C215 (THRIVE) in
antiretroviral treatment-Naive adults. Antiretroviral treatment-Naive HIV-1
infected subjects enrolled in the Phase 3 trials had a plasma HIV-1 RNA ≥
5000 copies/mL and were screened for susceptibility to N(t)RTIs and for absence
of specific NNRTI resistance-associated substitutions (RASs). The Phase 3
trials were identical in design, apart from the background regimen (BR). In
TMC278-C209, the BR was fixed to the N(t)RTIs, tenofovir disoproxil fumarate
plus emtricitabine. In TMC278-C215, the BR consisted of 2 investigator-selected
N(t)RTIs: tenofovir disoproxil fumarate plus emtricitabine or zidovudine plus
lamivudine or abacavir plus lamivudine. In both trials, randomization was
stratified by screening viral load. In TMC278-C215, randomization was also
stratified by N(t)RTI BR.
In the pooled analysis for TMC278-C209 and TMC278-C215,
demographics and baseline characteristics were balanced between the EDURANT arm
and the efavirenz arm. Table 12 displays selected demographic and baseline
disease characteristics of the subjects in the EDURANT and efavirenz arms.
Table 12: Demographic and Baseline Disease
Characteristics of Antiretroviral Treatment-Naive HIV-1Infected Adult Subjects
in the TMC278-C209 and TMC278-C215 Trials (Pooled Analysis)
|
Pooled Data from the Phase 3 TMC278-C209 and TMC278-C215 Trials |
EDURANT + BR
N=686 |
Efavirenz + BR
N=682 |
Demographic Characteristics |
Median Age, years (range) |
36 (18-78) |
36 (19-69) |
Sex |
Male |
76% |
76% |
Female |
24% |
24% |
Race |
White |
61% |
60% |
Black/African American |
24% |
23% |
Asian |
11% |
14% |
Other |
2% |
2% |
Not allowed to ask per local regulations |
1% |
1% |
Baseline Disease Characteristics |
Median Baseline Plasma HIV-1 RNA (range), log10 copies/mL |
5.0 (2-7) |
5.0 (3-7) |
Percentage of Patients with Baseline Plasma Viral Load: |
≤ 100,000 |
54% |
48% |
> 100,000 to ≤ 500,000 |
36% |
40% |
> 500,000 |
10% |
12% |
Median Baseline CD4+ Cell Count (range), cells/mm³ |
249 (1-888) |
260 (1-1137) |
Percentage of Subjects with: Hepatitis B/C Virus Co-infection |
7% |
10% |
Percentage of Patients with the Following Background Regimens: |
80% |
80% |
tenofovir disoproxil fumarate plus emtricitabine |
15% |
15% |
zidovudine plus lamivudine abacavir plus lamivudine |
5% |
5% |
BR=background regimen |
Week 96 efficacy outcomes for subjects treated with
EDURANT 25 mg once daily from the pooled analysis are shown in Table 13. The
incidence of virologic failure was higher in the EDURANT arm than the efavirenz
arm at Week 96. Virologic failures and discontinuations due to adverse events
mostly occurred in the first 48 weeks of treatment. Regardless of HIV-1 RNA at
the start of therapy, more EDURANT treated subjects with CD4+ cell count less
than 200 cells/mm³ experienced virologic failure compared to EDURANT treated
subjects with CD4+ cell count greater than or equal to 200 cells/mm³.
Table 13: Virologic Outcome of Randomized Treatment of
Studies TMC278-C209 and TMC278-C215 (Pooled Data) at Week 96
|
EDURANT + BR
N=686 |
Efavirenz + BR
N=682 |
HIV-1 RNA < 50 copies/mL* |
76% |
77% |
HIV-1 RNA ≥ 50 copies/mL† |
16% |
10% |
No virologic data at Week 96 window |
Reasons |
Discontinued study due to adverse event or death‡ |
4% |
8% |
Discontinued study for other reasons and last available HIV-1 RNA < 50 copies/mL (or missing)§ |
4% |
5% |
Missing data during window but on study |
< 1% |
< 1% |
HIV-1 RNA < 50 copies/mL by Baseline HIV-1 RNA (copies/mL) |
≤ 100,000 |
82% |
78% |
> 100,000 |
70% |
75% |
HIV-1 RNA ≥ 50 copies/mL† by Baseline HIV-1 RNA (copies/mL) |
≤100,000 |
9% |
8% |
> 100,000 |
24% |
11% |
HIV-1 RNA < 50 copies/mL by CD4+ cell count (cells/mm³) |
< 200 |
68% |
74% |
≥ 200 |
81% |
77% |
HIV-1 RNA ≥ 50 copies/mL1, by CD4+ cell count (cells/mm³) |
< 200 |
27% |
10% |
≥200 |
10% |
9% |
N = total number of subjects per treatment group; BR =
background regimen.
* CI = Predicted difference (95% CI) of response rate is -0.2 (-4.7; 4.3) at
Week 96.
† Includes subjects who had ≥ 50 copies/mL in the Week 96 window,
subjects who discontinued early due to lack or loss of efficacy, subjects who
discontinued for reasons other than an adverse event, death or lack or loss of
efficacy and at the time of discontinuation had a viral value of ≥ 50
copies/mL, and subjects who had a switch in background regimen that was not
permitted by the protocol.
‡ Includes subjects who discontinued due to an adverse event or death if this
resulted in no on-treatment virologic data in the Week 96 window.
§ Includes subjects who discontinued for reasons other than an adverse event,
death or lack or loss of efficacy, e.g., withdrew consent, loss to follow-up,
etc. Note: Analysis was based on the last observed viral load data within the
Week 96 window (Week 90-103), respectively. |
At Week 96, the mean CD4+ cell count increase from
baseline was 228 cells/mm³ for EDURANT-treated subjects and 219 cells/mm³ for
efavirenz-treated subjects in the pooled analysis of the TMC278-C209 and
TMC278-C215 trials.
Study TMC278-C204 was a randomized, active-controlled,
Phase 2b trial in antiretroviral treatment-Naive HIV-1-infected adult subjects
consisting of 2 parts: an initial 96 weeks, partially-blinded dose-finding part
[EDURANT doses blinded] followed by a long-term, open-label part. After Week
96, subjects randomized to one of the 3 doses of EDURANT were switched to
EDURANT 25 mg once daily. Subjects in the control arm received efavirenz 600 mg
once daily in addition to a BR in both parts of the study. The BR consisted of
2 investigator-selected N(t)RTIs: zidovudine plus lamivudine or tenofovir
disoproxil fumarate plus emtricitabine.
Study TMC278-C204 enrolled 368 HIV-1-infected
treatment-Naive adult subjects who had a plasma HIV-1 RNA ≥ 5000
copies/ml, previously received ≤ 2 weeks of treatment with an N(t)RTI or
protease inhibitor, had no prior use of NNRTIs, and were screened for susceptibility
to N(t)RTI and for absence of specific NNRTI RASs.
At 96 weeks, the proportion of subjects with <50 HIV-1
RNA copies/ml receiving EDURANT 25 mg (N = 93) compared to subjects receiving
efavirenz (N = 89) was 76% and 71%, respectively. The mean increase from baseline
in CD4+ counts was 146 cells/mm³ in subjects receiving EDURANT 25 mg and 160
cells/mm³ in subjects receiving efavirenz.
At 240 weeks, 60% (56/93) of subjects who originally
received 25 mg once daily achieved HIV RNA < 50 copies/mL compared to 57% (51/89)
of subjects in the control group.
Treatment-Naive Pediatric Subjects (12 To Less Than 18 Years
Of Age)
The pharmacokinetics, safety, tolerability and efficacy
of EDURANT 25 mg once daily, in combination with an investigator-selected
background regimen (BR) containing two NRTIs, was evaluated in trial
TMC278-C213, a single-arm, open-label Phase 2 trial in antiretroviral
treatment-Naive HIV-1 infected pediatric subjects 12 to less than 18 years of
age and weighing at least 32 kg. Thirty six (36) subjects were enrolled in the
trial to complete at least 48 weeks of treatment. The 36 subjects had a median
age of 14.5 years (range: 12 to 17 years), and were 55.6% female, 88.9% Black
and 11.1% Asian.
In the efficacy analysis, most subjects (75%; 28/36) had
baseline HIV RNA <100,000 copies/mL. For these 28 subjects the median
baseline plasma HIV-1 RNA was 44,250 (range: 2,060-92,600 copies/mL) and the
median baseline CD4+ cell count was 445.5 cells/mm³ (range: 123 to 983 cells/mm³).
Among the subjects who had baseline HIV RNA ≤
100,000, the proportion with HIV-1 RNA <50 copies/mL at Week 48 was 79%
(22/28), versus 50.0% (4/8) in those with >100,000 copies/mL. The proportion
of virologic failures among subjects with a baseline viral load ≤100,000
copies/mL was 21.4% (6/28), versus 37.5% (3/8) in those with >100,000
copies/mL. At Week 48, the mean increase in CD4+ cell count from baseline was
201.2 cells/mm³.