WARNINGS
Loss Of Bone Mineral Density
Use of depo-subQ provera 104 reduces serum estrogen levels and is associated with significant loss of bone mineral density (BMD). This loss of BMD is of particular concern during adolescence and early adulthood, a critical period of bone accretion. It is unknown if use of depo-subQ provera 104 by younger women will reduce peak bone mass and increase the risk for osteoporotic fracture in later life.
A study to assess the reversibility of loss of BMD in adolescents was conducted with Depo-Provera CI (150 mg medroxyprogesterone acetate IM, DMPA). After discontinuing Depo-Provera CI in adolescents, mean BMD loss at total hip and femoral neck did not fully recover by 60 months (240 weeks) post-treatment. Similarly, in adults, there was only partial recovery of mean BMD at total hip, femoral neck and lumbar spine towards baseline by 24 months post-treatment.
depo-subQ provera 104 should not be used as a long-term birth control method (i.e., longer than 2 years) unless other birth control methods are considered inadequate. BMD should be evaluated when a woman needs to continue to use depo-subQ provera 104 long-term. In adolescents, interpretation of BMD results should take into account patient age and skeletal maturity.
Other birth control methods should be considered in the risk/benefit analysis for the use of depo-subQ provera 104 in women with osteoporosis risk factors. depo-subQ provera 104 can pose an additional risk in patients with risk factors for osteoporosis (e.g., metabolic bone disease, chronic alcohol and/or tobacco use, anorexia nervosa, strong family history of osteoporosis or chronic use of drugs that can reduce bone mass such as anticonvulsants or corticosteroids). Although there are no studies addressing whether calcium and Vitamin D lessen BMD loss in women using deposubQ provera 104, all patients should have adequate calcium and Vitamin D intake.
BMD Changes In Adult Women After Long-Term Treatment For Contraception
A study comparing changes in BMD in women using depo-subQ provera 104 with women using Depo-Provera Contraceptive Injection (Depo-Provera CI, 150 mg) showed no significant differences in BMD loss between the two groups after two years of treatment. Mean percent changes in BMD in the depo-subQ provera 104 group are listed in Table 3.
Table 3: Mean Percent Change from Baseline in BMD in Women Using depo-subQ provera 104
Time on Treatment | Lumbar Spine | Total Hip | Femoral Neck |
N | Mean % Change (95% CI) | N | Mean % Change (95% CI) | N | Mean % Change (95% CI) |
1 year | 166 | -2.7 (-3.1 to -2.3) | 166 | -1.7 (-2.1 to -1.3) | 166 | -1.9 (-2.5 to -1.4) |
2 year | 106 | -4.1 (-4.6 to -3.5) | 106 | -3.5 (-4.2 to -2.7) | 106 | -3.5 (-4.3 to -2.6) |
In another controlled clinical study, adult women using Depo-Provera CI (150 mg) for up to 5 years showed spine and hip BMD mean decreases of 5–6%, compared to no significant change in BMD in the control group. The decline in BMD was more pronounced during the first two years of use, with smaller declines in subsequent years. Mean changes in lumbar spine BMD of –2.86%, -4.11%, -4.89%, -4.93% and –5.38% after 1, 2, 3, 4 and 5 years, respectively, were observed. Mean decreases in BMD of the total hip and femoral neck were similar.
After stopping use of Depo-Provera CI (150 mg) there was partial recovery of BMD toward baseline values during the 2-year post-therapy period. Longer duration of treatment was associated with less complete recovery during this 2-year period following the last injection. Table 4 shows the change in BMD in women after 5 years of treatment with Depo-Provera CI and in women in a control group, as well as the extent of recovery of BMD for the subset of the women for whom 2-year post treatment data were available.
Table 4: Mean Percent Change from Baseline in BMD in Adults by Skeletal Site and Cohort (5 Years of Treatment and 2 Years of Follow-Up)
Time in Study | Spine | Total Hip | Femoral Neck |
Depo-Provera * | Control** | Depo-Provera * | Control** | Depo-Provera * | Control** |
5 years | -5.38% n=33 | 0.43% n=105 | -5.16% n=21 | 0.19% n=65 | -6.12% n=34 | -0.27% n=106 |
7 years | -3.13% n=12 | 0.53% n=60 | -1.34% n=7 | 0.94% n=39 | -5.38% n=13 | -0.11% n=63 |
*The treatment group consisted of women who received Depo-Provera CI (150 mg) for 5 years and were then followed for 2 years post-use (total time in study of 7 years). **The control group consisted of women who did not use hormonal contraception and were followed for 7 years. |
Bone Mineral Density Changes In Adolescent Females (12–18 Years Of Age)
The impact of Depo-Provera CI (150 mg) use for up to 240 weeks (4.6 years) was evaluated in an open-label non-randomized clinical study in 389 adolescent females (12-18 years). Use of Depo-Provera CI was associated with a significant decline from baseline in BMD.
Partway through the trial, drug administration was stopped (at 120 weeks). The mean number of injections per Depo-Provera CI user was 9.3. The decline in BMD at total hip and femoral neck was greater with longer duration of use (see Table 5). The mean decrease in BMD at 240 weeks was more pronounced at total hip (-6.4%) and femoral neck (-5.4%) compared to lumbar spine (-2.1%).
In general, adolescents increase bone density during the period of growth following menarche, as seen in the untreated cohort. However, the two cohorts were not matched at baseline for age, gynecologic age, race, BMD and other factors that influence the rate of acquisition of bone mineral density.
Table 5: Mean Percent Change from Baseline in BMD in Adolescents Receiving ≥4 Injections per 60-week Period, by Skeletal Site and Cohort
Duration of Treatment | Depo-Provera CI (150 mg IM) | Unmatched, Untreated Cohort |
N | Mean % Change | N | Mean % Change |
Total Hip BMD |
Week 60 (1.2 years) | 113 | -2.75 | 166 | 1.22 |
Week 120 (2.3 years) | 73 | -5.40 | 109 | 2.19 |
Week 240 (4.6 years) | 28 | -6.40 | 84 | 1.71 |
Femoral Neck BMD |
Week 60 | 113 | -2.96 | 166 | 1.75 |
Week 120 | 73 | -5.30 | 108 | 2.83 |
Week 240 | 28 | -5.40 | 84 | 1.94 |
Lumbar Spine BMD |
Week 60 | 114 | -2.47 | 167 | 3.39 |
Week 120 | 73 | -2.74 | 109 | 5.28 |
Week 240 | 27 | -2.11 | 84 | 6.40 |
BMD Recovery Post-Treatment In Adolescent Women
Longer duration of treatment and smoking were associated with less recovery of BMD following the last injection of Depo-Provera CI. Table 6 shows the extent of recovery of BMD up to 60 months post-treatment for adolescent women who received Depo- Provera CI for two years or less compared to more than two years. Post-treatment follow-up showed that, in women treated for more than two years, only lumbar spine BMD recovered to baseline levels after treatment was discontinued. Subjects treated with Depo-Provera for more than two years did not recover to their baseline BMD level at femoral neck and total hip even up to 60 months post-treatment. Adolescent women in the untreated cohort gained BMD throughout the trial period (data not shown).
Table 6: Extent of BMD Recovery (Months Post-Treatment) in Adolescents by Years of Depo Provera CI Use (2 Years or Less vs. More than 2 Years)
Duration ofTreatment | 2 years or less | More than 2 years |
N | Mean % Change from baseline | N | Mean % Change from baseline |
Total Hip BMD |
End of Treatment | 49 | -1.5% | 49 | -6.2% |
12 M post-treatment | 33 | -1.4% | 24 | -4.6% |
24 M post-treatment | 18 | 0.3% | 17 | -3.6% |
36 M post-treatment | 12 | 2.1% | 11 | -4.6% |
48 M post-treatment | 10 | 1.3% | 9 | -2.5% |
60 M post-treatment | 3 | 0.2% | 2 | -1.0% |
Femoral Neck BMD |
End of Treatment | 49 | -1.6% | 49 | -5.8% |
12 M post-treatment | 33 | -1.4% | 24 | -4.3% |
24 M post-treatment | 18 | 0.5% | 17 | -3.8% |
36 M post-treatment | 12 | 1.2% | 11 | -3.8% |
48 M post-treatment | 10 | 2.0% | 9 | -1.7% |
60 M post-treatment | 3 | 1.0% | 2 | -1.9% |
Lumbar Spine BMD |
End of Treatment | 49 | -0.9% | 49 | -3.5% |
12 M post-treatment | 33 | 0.4% | 23 | -1.1% |
24 M post-treatment | 18 | 2.6% | 17 | 1.9% |
36 M post-treatment | 12 | 2.4% | 11 | 0.6% |
48 M post-treatment | 10 | 6.5% | 9 | 3.5% |
60 M post-treatment | 3 | 6.2% | 2 | 5.7% |
BMD Changes In Adult Women After Six Months Of Treatment For Endometriosis
In two clinical studies of 573 adult women with endometriosis, the BMD effects of 6 months of depo-subQ provera 104 treatment were compared to 6 months of leuprolide treatment. Subjects were then observed, off therapy, for an additional 12 months (Table 7).
Table 7: Mean Percent Change from Baseline in BMD after 6 Months on Therapy with depo-subQ provera 104 or Leuprolide and 6 and 12 Months after Stopping Therapy (Studies 268 and 270 Combined)
Time of Measurement | Lumbar Spine | Total Hip |
depo-subQ provera 104 | Leuprolide | depo-subQ provera 104 | Leuprolide |
N | Mean % change | N | Mean % change | N | Mean % change | N | Mean % change |
Month 6 of treatment (EOT) | 208 | -1.20 | 229 | -4.10 | 207 | -0.03 | 227 | -1.83 |
6 months off treatment | 168 | -1.06 | 180 | -2.75 | 169 | -0.05 | 181 | -1.59 |
12 months off treatment | 124 | -0.54 | 133 | -1.48 | 125 | 0.39 | 134 | -1.15 |
EOT = End of Treatment |
Bleeding Irregularities
Most women using depo-subQ provera 104 experienced changes in menstrual bleeding patterns, such as amenorrhea, irregular spotting or bleeding, prolonged spotting or bleeding, and heavy bleeding. As women continued using depo-subQ provera 104, fewer experienced irregular bleeding and more experienced amenorrhea. If abnormal bleeding is persistent or severe, appropriate investigation and treatment should be instituted.
In three contraception trials, 39.0 % of women experienced amenorrhea during month six, and 56.5% experienced amenorrhea during month 12. The changes in menstrual bleeding patterns from the three contraception trials are presented in Figures 3 and 4.
Figure 3: Percentages of depo-subQ provera 104 Treated Women with Amenorrhea per 30-Day Month in Contraception Studies (ITT Population, N=2053)
N = Number of subjects in analysis for indicated month
Figure 4: Mean (25th, 75th Percentiles) Number of Bleeding and/or Spotting Days in the Subgroup of Women with Bleeding and/or Spotting by Month for Women Treated with depo-subQ provera 104 in Contraception Studies
N = Number of subjects with bleeding and/or spotting during indicated month
The changes in menstrual patterns in the two endometriosis trials are presented in Figures 5 and 6.
Figure 5: Percentages of depo-subQ provera 104 Treated Women with Amenorrhea per 30-Day Month in Endometriosis Studies (Combined ITT Population, N=289)
N = Number of subjects in analysis for indicated month
Figure 6: Mean (25th, 75th Percentiles) Number of Bleeding and/or Spotting Days in the Subgroup of Women with Bleeding and/or Spotting by Month for Women Treated with depo-subQ provera 104 in Endometriosis Studies Combined
N = Number of subjects with bleeding and/or spotting during indicated month
Cancer Risks
Women who have or have had breast cancer should not use hormonal contraceptives, including depo sub-Q provera 104, because breast cancer may be hormonally sensitive [see CONTRAINDICATIONS]. Women with a strong family history of breast cancer should be monitored with particular care. The results of five large case-control studies ii iii iv v vi assessing the association between depo-medroxyprogesterone acetate (DMPA) use and the risk of breast cancer are summarized in Figure 7. Three of the studies suggest a slightly increased risk of breast cancer in the overall population of users; these increased risks were statistically significant in one study. One recent US studyii evaluated the recency and duration of use and found a statistically significant increased risk of breast cancer in recent users (defined as last use within the past five years) who used DMPA for 12 months or longer; this is consistent with results of a previous studyv.
Figure 7: Risk estimates of breast cancer in DMPA users
Odds ratio estimates were adjusted for the following covariates:
Lee et al. (1987): age, parity, and socioeconomic status.
Paul et al. (1989): age, parity, ethnic group, and year of interview.
WHO (1991): age, center, and age at first live birth.
Shapiro et al. (2000): age, ethnic group, socioeconomic status, and any combined estrogen/progestogen oral contraceptive use.
Li et al. (2012): age, year, BMI, duration of OC use, number of full-term pregnancies, family history of breast cancer, and history of screening mammography.
Based on the published SEER-18 2011 incidence rate (age-adjusted to the 2000 US Standard Population ) of breast cancer for US women, all races, age 20 to 49vii years a doubling of risk would increase the incidence of breast cancer in women who use Depo- Provera CI from about 72 to about 144 cases per 100,000 women.
The relative rate of invasive squamous-cell cervical cancer in women who ever used Depo-Provera CI (150 mg) was estimated to be 1.11 (95% CI 0.96 to 1.29). No trends in risk with duration of use or times since initial or most recent exposure were observed.
Thromboembolic Disorders
Although MPA has not been causally associated with the induction of thrombotic or thromboembolic disorders, there have been rare reports of serious thrombotic events in women using Depo-Provera CI (150 mg). Any patient who develops thrombosis while undergoing therapy with depo-subQ provera 104 should discontinue treatment unless she has no other acceptable options for birth control (see CONTRAINDICATIONS).
Ocular Disorders
Medication should not be re-administered pending examination if there is a sudden partial or complete loss of vision or if there is a sudden onset of proptosis, diplopia or migraine. If examination reveals papilledema or retinal vascular lesions, medication should not be re-administered.
Ectopic Pregnancy
Healthcare providers should be alert to the possibility of an ectopic pregnancy among women using depo-subQ provera 104 who become pregnant or complain of severe abdominal pain.
Anaphylaxis And Anaphylactoid Reaction
Serious anaphylactic reactions have been reported in women using depo-subQ provera 104. If an anaphylactic reaction occurs, appropriate emergency medical treatment should be instituted.