Clinical Pharmacology for Complera
Mechanism Of Action
COMPLERA is a fixed-dose combination of the antiretroviral drugs FTC, RPV, and TDF [see Microbiology].
Pharmacodynamics
Effects On Electrocardiogram
The effect of RPV at the recommended dose of 25 mg once daily on the QTcF interval was evaluated in a randomized, placebo-, and active- (moxifloxacin 400 mg once daily) controlled crossover study in 60 healthy adults, with 13 measurements over 24 hours at steady state. The maximum mean time-matched (95% upper confidence bound) differences in QTcF interval from placebo after baseline correction was 2.0 (5.0) milliseconds (i.e., below the threshold of clinical concern).
When doses of 75 mg once daily and 300 mg once daily of RPV (3 times and 12 times the dose in COMPLERA) were studied in healthy adults, the maximum mean time-matched (95% upper confidence bound) differences in QTcF interval from placebo after baseline correction were 10.7 (15.3) and 23.3 (28.4) milliseconds, respectively. Steady-state administration of RPV 75 mg once daily and 300 mg once daily resulted in a mean steady-state Cmax approximately 2.6-fold and 6.7-fold, respectively, higher than the mean Cmax observed with the recommended 25 mg once daily dose of RPV [see WARNINGS AND PRECAUTIONS].
Pharmacokinetics
COMPLERA
Under fed conditions (total calorie content of the meal was approximately 400 kcal with approximately 13 grams of fat), RPV, FTC, and tenofovir exposures were similar when comparing COMPLERA to EMTRIVA capsules (200 mg) plus Edurant tablets (25 mg) plus VIREAD tablets (300 mg) following single-dose administration to healthy subjects (N=34).
Single-dose administration of COMPLERA tablets to healthy subjects under fasted conditions provided approximately 25% higher exposure of RPV compared to administration of EMTRIVA capsules (200 mg) plus Edurant tablets (25 mg) plus VIREAD tablets (300 mg), while exposures of FTC and tenofovir were comparable (N=15).
Absorption, Distribution, Metabolism, And Excretion
The pharmacokinetic properties of the components of COMPLERA are provided in Table 5. The PK parameters of RPV, FTC, and tenofovir are provided in Table 6.
Table 5 : Pharmacokinetic Properties of the Components of COMPLERA
|
RPV |
FTC |
Tenofovir |
| Absorption |
| Tmax (h) |
4-5 |
1-2 |
1 |
| % Fasted oral bioavailabilitya |
NC |
93 |
25f |
| Effect of a light meal (relative to fasting)b |
↑9% |
↔ |
↑28% |
| Effect of a standard meal (relative to fasting)b |
↑16% |
↔ |
↑38% |
| Distribution |
| % Bound to human plasma proteins |
~99 |
<4 |
<0.7 |
| Source of protein binding data |
In vitro |
In vitro |
In vitro |
| Metabolism |
| Metabolism |
CYP3A |
Not significantly metabolized |
| Elimination |
| Major route of elimination |
Metabolism |
Glomerular filtration and active tubular secretion |
| CLrenalc (mL/min) |
NC |
213 + 89 |
243 + 33 |
| t½ (h)d |
50 |
10 |
17 |
| % Of dose excreted in urinee |
6 |
86 |
70-80 |
| % Of dose excreted in fecese |
85 |
~14 |
NC |
NC=Not Calculated
a Median
b Values refer to % change based on calculated geometric mean ratio [fed/fasted] in AUC. COMPLERA light meal = 390 kcal, 12 g fat; COMPLERA standard meal = 540 kcal, 21 g fat. High fat meal not evaluated. Increase = ↑; Decrease = ↓; No Effect= ↔
c Mean ± SD
d t½ values refer to median terminal plasma half-life.
e Dosing in mass balance studies: FTC (single dose administration of [14C] FTC after multiple dosing of FTC for 10 days); RPV (single dose administration of [14C] RPV); mass balance study not conducted for tenofovir.
f Oral bioavailability of tenofovir from VIREAD. |
Table 6 : Pharmacokinetic Parameters for RPV, FTC, and Tenofovir in HIV-Infected Adults
| Parameter Mean ± SD |
RPVa |
FTCb |
Tenofovirc |
| Cmax (μg/mL) |
NA |
1.80 + 0.72d |
0.30 + 0.09 |
| AUCtau (μg•hr/mL) |
2.24 + 0.85d |
10.0 + 3.12d |
2.29 + 0.69e |
| C0h (μg/mL) |
0.08 + 0.04d |
0.09 + 0.07d |
NA |
NA=Not Applicable; SD=Standard Deviation
a Population PK estimates of RPV 25 mg once daily in antiretroviral treatment-naïve HIV-1-infected adult subjects (pooled data from Phase 3 trials through Week 96; n=679)
b Multiple-dose oral administration of FTC 200 mg to HIV-1-infected subjects (n=20)
c Single 300 mg dose of TDF to HIV-1-infected subjects in the fasted state
d Data presented as steady state values
e AUC0-24h |
Specific Populations
Geriatric Patients
The pharmacokinetics of FTC, RPV, and tenofovir have not been fully evaluated in the elderly (65 years of age and older) [see Use In Specific Populations].
Pediatric Patients
Pediatric trials have not been conducted using COMPLERA tablets. Pediatric information is based on trials conducted with the individual components of COMPLERA [see Use In Specific Populations].
Emtricitabine
The pharmacokinetics of FTC at steady state were determined in 27 HIV-1-infected pediatric subjects 13 to 17 years of age receiving a daily dose of 6 mg/kg up to a maximum dose of 240 mg oral solution or a 200 mg capsule; 26 of 27 subjects in this age group received the 200 mg FTC capsule. Mean (± SD) Cmax and AUC were 2.7 ± 0.9 μg/mL and 12.6 ± 5.4 μg•hr/mL, respectively. Exposures achieved in pediatric subjects 12 to less than 18 years of age were similar to those achieved in adults receiving a once daily dose of 200 mg.
Rilpivirine
The pharmacokinetics of RPV in antiretroviral treatment-naïve HIV-1- infected pediatric subjects 12 to less than 18 years of age receiving RPV 25 mg once daily were comparable to those in treatment-naïve HIV-1-infected adults receiving RPV 25 mg once daily (See Table 7). There was no clinically significant impact of body weight on RPV pharmacokinetics in pediatric subjects in trial C213 (33 to 93 kg).
Table 7 : Population Pharmacokinetic Estimates of RPV 25 mg once daily in Antiretroviral Treatment-Naïve HIV-1-Infected Pediatric Subjects aged 12 to less than 18 years (Data from Phase 2 Trial through Week 48)
| Parameter |
RPV 25 mg once daily
N=34 |
| AUC24h (ng•h/mL) |
| Mean ± Standard Deviation |
2424 ± 1024 |
| Median (Range) |
2269 (417-5166) |
| C0h (ng/mL) |
| Mean ± Standard Deviation |
85 ± 40 |
| Median (Range) |
79 (7-202) |
Tenofovir DF
Steady-state pharmacokinetics of tenofovir were evaluated in 8 HIV-1-infected pediatric subjects (12 to less than 18 years). Mean (± SD) Cmax and AUCtau are 0.38 ± 0.13 μg/mL and 3.39 ± 1.22 μg•hr/mL, respectively. Tenofovir exposure achieved in these pediatric subjects receiving oral daily doses of TDF 300 mg was similar to exposures achieved in adults receiving once-daily doses of TDF 300 mg.
Gender
No clinically relevant pharmacokinetic differences have been observed based on gender for FTC, RPV, and TDF.
Race
Emtricitabine
No pharmacokinetic differences due to race have been identified following the administration of FTC.
Rilpivirine
Population pharmacokinetic analysis of RPV in HIV-1-infected subjects indicated that race had no clinically relevant effect on the exposure to RPV.
Tenofovir DF
There were insufficient numbers from racial and ethnic groups other than Caucasian to adequately determine potential pharmacokinetic differences among these populations following the administration of TDF.
Patients With Renal Impairment
Emtricitabine And Tenofovir DF
The pharmacokinetics of FTC and TDF are altered in subjects with renal impairment. In subjects with creatinine clearance below 50 mL per minute or with end stage renal disease requiring dialysis, Cmax and AUC of FTC and tenofovir were increased [see WARNINGS AND PRECAUTIONS and Use In Specific Populations].
Rilpivirine
Population pharmacokinetic analysis indicated that RPV exposure was similar in HIV-1-infected subjects with mild renal impairment relative to HIV-1-infected subjects with normal renal function. There is limited or no information regarding the pharmacokinetics of RPV in patients with moderate or severe renal impairment or in patients with end-stage renal disease, and RPV concentrations may be increased due to alteration of drug absorption, distribution, and metabolism secondary to renal dysfunction [see Use In Specific Populations].
Patients With Hepatic Impairment
Emtricitabine
The pharmacokinetics of FTC have not been studied in subjects with hepatic impairment; however, FTC is not significantly metabolized by liver enzymes, so the impact of liver impairment should be limited.
Rilpivirine
RPV is primarily metabolized and eliminated by the liver. In a study comparing 8 subjects with mild hepatic impairment (Child-Pugh score A) to 8 matched controls, and 8 subjects with moderate hepatic impairment (Child-Pugh score B) to 8 matched controls, the multiple dose exposure of RPV was 47% higher in subjects with mild hepatic impairment and 5% higher in subjects with moderate hepatic impairment. RPV has not been studied in subjects with severe hepatic impairment (Child-Pugh score C) [see Use In Specific Populations].
Tenofovir DF
The pharmacokinetics of tenofovir following a 300 mg dose of TDF have been studied in non-HIV-infected subjects with moderate to severe hepatic impairment. There were no substantial alterations in tenofovir pharmacokinetics in subjects with hepatic impairment compared with unimpaired subjects.
Hepatitis B And/Or Hepatitis C Virus Coinfection
The pharmacokinetics of FTC and TDF have not been fully evaluated in hepatitis B and/or C virus-coinfected patients. Population pharmacokinetic analysis indicated that hepatitis B and/or C virus coinfection had no clinically relevant effect on the exposure to RPV.
Pregnancy And Postpartum
The exposure (C0h and AUC24h) to total RPV after intake of RPV 25 mg once daily as part of an antiretroviral regimen was 30 to 40% lower during pregnancy (similar for the second and third trimester), compared with postpartum (see Table 8). However, the exposure during pregnancy was not significantly different from exposures obtained in Phase 3 trials of RPV-containing regimens. Based on the exposure-response relationship for RPV, this decrease is not considered clinically relevant in patients who are virologically suppressed. The protein binding of RPV was similar (>99%) during the second trimester, third trimester, and postpartum.
Table 8: Pharmacokinetic Results of Total RPV After Administration of RPV 25 mg Once Daily as Part of an Antiretroviral Regimen, During the 2nd Trimester of Pregnancy, the 3rd Trimester of Pregnancy and Postpartum
| Pharmacokinetics of total RPV (mean ±SD, tmax: median [range]) |
Postpartum (6-12 Weeks)
(n=11) |
2nd Trimester of pregnancy
(n=15) |
3rd Trimester of pregnancy
(n=13) |
| C0h, ng/mL |
111 ± 69.2 |
65.0 ± 23.9 |
63.5 ± 26.2 |
| Cmin, ng/mL |
84.0 ± 58.8 |
54.3 ± 25.8 |
52.9 ± 24.4 |
| Cmax, ng/mL |
167 ± 101 |
121 ± 45.9 |
123 ± 47.5 |
| tmax, h |
4.00
(2.03-25.08) |
4.00
(1.00-9.00) |
4.00
(2.00-24.93) |
| AUC24h, ng•h/mL |
2,714 ± 1,535 |
1,792 ± 711 |
1,762 ± 662 |
Drug Interaction Studies
Rilpivirine
RPV is primarily metabolized by cytochrome CYP3A, and drugs that induce or inhibit CYP3A may thus affect the clearance of RPV. Coadministration of COMPLERA and drugs that induce CYP3A may result in decreased plasma concentrations of RPV and loss of virologic response and possible resistance. Coadministration of COMPLERA and drugs that inhibit CYP3A may result in increased plasma concentrations of RPV. Coadministration of COMPLERA with drugs that increase gastric pH may result in decreased plasma concentrations of RPV and loss of virologic response and possible resistance to RPV and to the class of NNRTIs.
RPV at a dose of 25 mg once daily is not likely to have a clinically relevant effect on the exposure of medicinal products metabolized by CYP enzymes.
Emtricitabine And Tenofovir DF
In vitro and clinical pharmacokinetic drug-drug interaction studies have shown that the potential for CYP-mediated interactions involving FTC and tenofovir with other medicinal products is low.
FTC and tenofovir are primarily excreted by the kidneys by a combination of glomerular filtration and active tubular secretion. No drug-drug interactions due to competition for renal excretion have been observed; however, coadministration of FTC and TDF with drugs that are eliminated by active tubular secretion may increase concentrations of FTC, tenofovir, and/or the coadministered drug [see DRUG INTERACTIONS].
Drugs that decrease renal function may increase concentrations of FTC and/or tenofovir.
The drug interaction studies described in Tables 9-14 were conducted with COMPLERA (RPV/FTC/TDF) or the components of COMPLERA (RPV, FTC, or TDF) administered individually.
The effects of coadministration of other drugs on the AUC, Cmax, and Cmin values of RPV, FTC, and TDF are summarized in Tables 9, 10, and 11, respectively. The effect of coadministration of RPV, FTC, and TDF on the AUC, Cmax, and Cmin values of other drugs are summarized in Tables 12, 13, and 14, respectively. For information regarding clinical recommendations, see DRUG INTERACTIONS.
Table 9 : Drug Interactions: Changes in Pharmacokinetic Parameters for RPV in the Presence of the Coadministered Drugs
| Coadministered Drug |
Dose of Coadministered Drug (mg) |
RPV Dose (mg) |
Na |
Mean % Change of RPV Pharmacokinetic Parametersb (90% CI) |
| Cmax |
AUC |
Cmin |
| Acetaminophen |
500 single dose |
150 once dailyc |
16 |
↑9
(↑1 to ↑18) |
↑16
(↑10 to ↑22) |
↑26
(↑16 to ↑38) |
| Atorvastatin |
40 once daily |
150 once dailyc |
16 |
↓9
(↓21 to ↑6) |
↓10
(↓19 to ↓1) |
↓10
(↓16 to ↓4) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Chlorzoxazone |
500 single dose taken 2 hours after RPV |
150 once dailyc |
16 |
↑17
(↑8 to ↑27) |
↑25
(↑16 to ↑35) |
↑18
(↑9 to ↑28) |
| Ethinyl Estradiol/ Norethindrone |
0.035 once daily/1 once daily |
25 once daily |
16 |
↔d |
↔d |
↔d |
| Famotidine |
40 single dose taken 12 hours before RPV |
150 single dosec |
24 |
↓1
(↓16 to ↑16) |
↓9
(↓22 to ↑7) |
NA |
| 40 single dose taken 2 hours before RPV |
150 single dosec |
23 |
↓85
(↓88 to ↓81) |
↓76
(↓80 to ↓72) |
NA |
| 40 single dose taken 4 hours after RPV |
150 single dosec |
24 |
↑21
(↑6 to ↑39) |
↑13
(↑1 to ↑27) |
NA |
| Ketoconazole |
400 once daily |
150 once dailyc |
15 |
↑30
(↑13 to ↑48) |
↑49
(↑31 to ↑70) |
↑76
(↑57 to ↑97) |
| Ledipasvir/ Sofosbuvir |
90/400 once daily |
25 once dailyd |
14 |
↓3
(↓12 to ↑7) |
↑2
(↓6 to ↑11) |
↑12
(↑3 to ↑21) |
| Methadone |
60-100 once daily individualized dose |
25 once daily |
12 |
↔e |
↔e |
↔e |
| Omeprazole |
20 once daily |
150 once dailyc |
16 |
↓40
(↓52 to ↓27) |
↓40
(↓49 to ↓29) |
↓33
(↓42 to ↓22) |
| Rifabutin |
300 once daily |
25 once daily |
18 |
↓31
(↓38 to ↓24) |
↓42
(↓48 to ↓35) |
↓48
(↓54 to ↓41) |
| 300 once daily |
50 once daily |
18 |
↑43
(↑30 to ↑56)f |
↑16
(↑6 to ↑26)f |
↓7
(↓15 to↑1)f |
| Rifampin |
600 once daily |
150 once dailyc |
16 |
↓69
(↓73 to ↓64) |
↓80
(↓82 to ↓77) |
↓89
(↓90 to ↓87) |
| Simeprevir |
25 once daily |
150 once daily |
23 |
↑ 4
(↓ 5 to ↑ 13) |
↑ 12
(↑ 5 to ↑ 19) |
↑ 25
(↑ 16 to ↑ 35) |
| Sildenafil |
50 single dose |
75 once daily |
16 |
↓8
(↓15 to ↓1) |
↓2
(↓8 to ↑5) |
↑4
(↓2 to ↑9) |
| Sofosbuvir/ Velpatasvir |
400/100 once daily |
25 once dailyg |
24 |
↓7
(↓12 to ↓2) |
↓5
(↓10 to 0) |
↓4
(↓10 to ↑3) |
| Sofosbuvir/ Velpatasvir/ Voxilaprevirh |
400/100/100 + 100 voxilapreviri once daily |
25 once daily |
30 |
↓21
(↓26 to ↓16) |
↓20
(↓24 to ↓15) |
↓18
(↓23 to ↓13) |
| TDF |
300 once daily |
150 once dailyc |
16 |
↓4
(↓19 to ↑13) |
↑1
(↓13 to ↑18) |
↓1
(↓17 to ↑16) |
NA=not available
a N=maximum number of subjects for Cmax, AUC, or Cmin
b Increase = ↑; Decrease = ↓; No Effect = ↔
c The interaction study has been performed with a dose higher than the recommended dose for RPV (25 mg once daily) assessing the maximal effect on the coadministered drug.
d Study conducted with COMPLERA (RPV/FTC/TDF) coadministered with HARVONI Â ledipasvir/sofosbuvir).
e Comparison based on historic controls.
f Reference arm for comparison was 25 mg q.d. RPV administered alone.
g Study conducted with COMPLERA coadministered with EPCLUSA (sofosbuvir/velpatasvir).
h Study conducted with ODEFSEY® (FTC/RPV/tenofovir alafenamide).
i Study conducted with additional voxilaprevir 100 mg to achieve voxilaprevir exposures expected in HCV-infected patients. |
Table 10 : Drug Interactions: Changes in Pharmacokinetic Parameters for FTC in the Presence of the Coadministered Drugs
| Coadministered Drug |
Dose of Coadministered Drug (mg) |
FTC Dose (mg) |
Na |
Mean % Change of FTC Pharmacokinetic Parametersb (90% CI) |
| Cmax |
AUC |
Cmin |
| Famciclovir |
500 x 1 |
200 x 1 |
12 |
↔ |
↔ |
NA |
| Ledipasvir/ Sofosbuvir |
90/400 once daily |
200 once dailyc |
15 |
↑2
(↓2 to ↑6) |
↑5
(↑2 to ↑8) |
↑6
(↓3 to ↑15) |
| Sofosbuvir/ Velpatasvir |
400/100 once daily |
200 once dailyd |
24 |
↓5
(↓10 to 0) |
↓1
(↓3 to ↑2) |
↑5
(↓1 to ↑11) |
| Sofosbuvir/ Velpatasvir/ Voxilaprevir |
400/100/100 + Voxilaprevire 100 once daily |
200 once dailyf |
30 |
↓12
(↓17 to ↓7) |
↓7
(↓10 to ↓4) |
↑7
(↑1 to ↑14) |
| TDF |
300 once daily x 7 days |
200 once daily x 7 days |
17 |
↔ |
↔ |
↑ 20
(↑ 12 to ↑ 29) |
NA=not available
a N=maximum number of subjects for Cmax, AUC, or Cmin
b Increase = ↑; Decrease = ↓; No Effect = ↔
c Study conducted with COMPLERA coadministered with HARVONI.
d Study conducted with COMPLERA coadministered with EPCLUSA.
e Study conducted with additional voxilaprevir 100 mg to achieve voxilaprevir exposures expected in HCV-infected patients.
f Study conducted with ODEFSEY (FTC/RPV/tenofovir alafenamide). |
Table 11 : Drug Interactions: Changes in Pharmacokinetic Parameters for Tenofovir in the Presence of the Coadministered Drugs
| Coadministered Drug |
Dose of Coadministered Drug (mg) |
TDF Dose (mg)a |
Nb |
Mean % Change of Tenofovir Pharmacokinetic Parametersc(90% CI) |
| Cmax |
AUC |
Cmin |
| Entecavir |
1 once daily x 10 days |
300 once daily |
|
↔ |
↔ |
↔ |
| Emtricitabine |
200 once daily x 7 days |
300 once daily x 7 days |
17 |
↔ |
↔ |
↔ |
| Ledipasvir/ Sofosbuvir |
90/400 once daily x 10 days |
300 once dailyd |
14 |
↑ 32
(↑ 25 to ↑ 39 ) |
↑ 40
(↑ 31 to ↑ 50 ) |
↑ 91
(↑ 74 to ↑ 110) |
| Sofosbuvir/ Velpatasvir |
400/100 once daily |
300 once daily |
24 |
↑ 44
(↑ 33 to ↑ 55) |
↑ 40
(↑ 34 to ↑ 46) |
↑ 84
(↑ 76 to ↑ 92) |
| Tacrolimus |
0.05 mg/kg twice daily x 7 days |
300 once dailye |
21 |
↑ 13
(↑ 1 to ↑ 27) |
↔ |
↔ |
NA=not available
a Subjects received VIREAD 300 mg daily.
b N=maximum number of subjects for Cmax, AUC, or Cmin
c Increase = ↑; Decrease = ↓; No Effect = ↔
d Study conducted with COMPLERA coadministered with HARVONI.
e Study conducted with COMPLERA coadministered with EPCLUSA. |
Table 12 : Drug Interactions: Changes in Pharmacokinetic Parameters for Coadministered Drugs in the Presence of RPV
| Coadministered Drug |
Dose of Coadministered Drug (mg) |
RPV Dose (mg) |
Na |
Mean % Change of Coadministered Drug Pharmacokinetic Parametersb (90% CI) |
| Cmax |
AUC |
Cmin |
| Acetaminophen |
500 single dose |
150 once dailyc |
16 |
↓ 3
(↓ 14 to ↑ 10) |
↓ 8
(↓ 15 to ↓ 1) |
NA |
| Atorvastatin |
40 once daily |
150 once dailyc |
16 |
↑ 35
(↑ 8 to ↑ 68) |
↑ 4
(↓ 3 to ↑ 12) |
↓ 15
(↓ 31 to ↑ 3) |
| 2-hydroxy-atorvas tatin |
16 |
↑ 58
(↑ 33 to ↑ 87) |
↑ 39
(↑ 29 to ↑ 50) |
↑ 32
(↑ 10 to ↑ 58) |
| 4-hydroxy-atorvas tatin |
16 |
↑ 28
(↑ 15 to ↑ 43) |
↑ 23
(↑ 13 to ↑ 33) |
NA |
| Chlorzoxazone |
500 single dose taken 2 hours after RPV |
150 once dailyc |
16 |
↓ 2
(↓ 15 to ↑ 13) |
↑ 3
(↓ 5 to ↑ 13) |
NA |
| Digoxin |
0.5 single dose |
25 once daily |
22 |
↑ 6
(↓ 3 to ↑ 17) |
↓ 2
(↓ 7 to ↑ 4) |
NA |
| Ethinyl estradiol |
0.035 once daily |
25 once daily |
17 |
↑ 17
(↑ 6 to ↑ 30) |
↑ 14
(↑ 10 to ↑ 19) |
↑ 9
(↑ 3 to ↑ 16) |
| Norethindrone |
1 mg once daily |
↓ 6
(↓ 17 to ↑ 6) |
↓ 11
(↓ 16 to ↓ 6) |
↓ 1
(↓ 10 to ↑ 8) |
| Ketoconazole |
400 once daily |
150 once dailyc |
14 |
↓ 15
(↓ 20 to ↓ 10) |
↓ 24
(↓ 30 to ↓ 18) |
↓ 66
(↓ 75 to ↓ 54) |
| Ledipasvir |
90 once daily |
25 once daily |
41 |
↑ 1
(↓ 3 to ↑ 5) |
↑ 2
(↓ 3 to ↑ 6) |
↑ 2
(↓ 2 to ↑ 7) |
| R(-) methadone |
60-100 once daily individualized dose |
25 once daily |
13 |
↓ 14
(↓ 22 to ↓ 5) |
↓ 16
(↓ 26 to ↓ 5) |
↓ 22
(↓ 33 to ↓ 9) |
| S( + ) methadone |
13 |
↓ 13
(↓ 22 to ↓ 3) |
↓ 16
(↓ 26 to ↓ 4) |
↓ 21
(↓ 33 to ↓ 8) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Metformin |
850 single dose |
25 once daily |
20 |
↑ 2
(↓ 5 to ↑ 10) |
↓ 3
(↓ 10 to ↑ 6) |
NA |
| Omeprazole |
20 once daily |
150 once dailyc |
15 |
↓ 14
(↓ 32 to ↑ 9) |
↓ 14
(↓ 24 to ↓ 3) |
NA |
| Rifampin |
600 once daily |
150 once dailyc |
16 |
↑ 2
(↓ 7 to ↑ 12) |
↓ 1
(↓ 8 to ↑ 7) |
NA |
| 25-desacetylrifam pin |
16 |
↔
(↓ 13 to ↑ 15) |
↓ 9
(↓ 23 to ↑ 7) |
NA |
| Simeprevir |
150 once daily |
25 once daily |
21 |
↑ 10
(↓ 3 to ↑ 26) |
↑ 6
(↓ 6 to ↑ 19) |
↓ 4
(↓ 17 to ↑ 11) |
| Sildenafil W-desmethyl- sildenafil |
50 single dose |
75 once dailyc |
16 |
↓ 7
(↓ 20 to ↑ 8) |
↓ 3
(↓ 13 to ↑ 8) |
NA |
↓ 10
(↓ 20 to ↑ 2) |
↓ 8
(↓ 15 to ↓ 1) |
NA |
| Sofosbuvir GS-331007d |
400 once daily |
25 once daily |
24 |
↑ 9
(↓ 5 to ↑ 25) |
↑ 16
(↑ 10 to ↑ 24) |
NA |
↓ 4
(↓ 10 to ↑ 1) |
↑ 4
(0 to ↑ 7) |
↑ 12
(↑ 7 to ↑ 17) |
| Velpatasvir |
100 once daily |
25 once daily |
24 |
↓ 4
(↓ 15 to ↑ 10) |
↓ 1
(↓ 12 to ↑ 11) |
↑ 2
(↓ 9 to ↑ 15) |
| Sofosbuvir GS-331007d |
400 once daily |
25 once dailye |
30 |
↓ 5
(↓ 14 to ↑ 5) |
↑ 1
(↓ 3 to ↑ 6) |
NA |
↑ 2
(↓ 2 to ↑ 6) |
↑ 4
(↑ 1 to ↑ 6) |
NA |
| Velpatasvir |
100 once daily |
25 once dailye |
30 |
↑ 5
(↓ 4 to ↑ 16) |
↑ 1
(↓ 6 to ↑ 7) |
↑ 1
(↓ 5 to ↑ 9) |
| Voxilaprevir |
100 + 100 once daily |
25 once dailye |
30 |
↓ 4
(↓ 16 to ↑ 11) |
↓ 6
(↓ 16 to ↑ 5) |
↑ 2
(↓ 8 to ↑ 12) |
| TDF |
300 once daily |
150 once dailyc |
16 |
↑ 19
(↑ 6 to ↑ 34) |
↑ 23
(↑ 16 to ↑ 31) |
↑ 24
(↑ 10 to ↑ 38) |
NA = not available
a N=maximum number of subjects for Cmax, AUC, or Cmin
b Increase = ↑; Decrease = ↓; No Effect = ↔
c The Interaction study has been performed with a dose higher than the recommended dose for RPV (25 mg once daily).
d The predominant circulating nucleoside metabolite of sofosbuvir.
e Study conducted with ODEFSEY. |
Table 13 : Drug Interactions: Changes in Pharmacokinetic Parameters for Coadministered Drugs in the Presence of FTC
| Coadministered Drug |
Dose of Coadministered Drug (mg) |
FTC Dose (mg) |
Na |
Mean % Change of Coadministered Drug Pharmacokinetic Parametersb (90% CI) |
| Cmax |
AUC |
Cmin |
| Famciclovir |
500 x 1 |
200 x 1 |
12 |
↔ |
↔ |
NA |
| TDF |
300 once daily x 7 days |
200 once daily x 7 days |
17 |
↔ |
↔ |
↔ |
NA=not available
a All interaction trials conducted in healthy volunteers
b No Effect = ↔ |
No clinically significant drug interactions have been observed between FTC and indinavir, sofosbuvir/velpatasvir, sofosbuvir/velpatasvir/voxilaprevir, stavudine, and zidovudine.
Table 14 : Drug Interactions: Changes in Pharmacokinetic Parameters for Coadministered Drugs in the Presence of TDF
| Coadministered Drug |
Dose of Coadministered Drug (mg) |
TDF Dose (mg) |
Na |
Mean % Change of Coadministered Drug Pharmacokinetic Parametersb (90% CI) |
| Cmax |
AUC |
Cmin |
| Emtricitabine |
200 once daily x 7 days |
300 once daily x 7 days |
17 |
↔ |
↔ |
↑ 20
(↑ 12 to ↑ 29) |
| Entecavir |
1 once daily x 10 days |
300 once daily |
28 |
↔ |
↑ 13
(↑ 11 to ↑ 15) |
↔ |
| Tacrolimus |
0.05 mg/kg twice daily x 7 days |
300 once daily |
21 |
↔ |
↔ |
↔ |
NA=not available
a All interaction trials conducted in healthy volunteers
b Increase = ↑; No Effect = ↔ |
No effect on the pharmacokinetic parameters of the following coadministered drugs was observed with TDF: methadone, oral contraceptives (ethinyl estradiol/norgestimate), or ribavirin.
Microbiology
Mechanism Of Action
Emtricitabine
FTC, a synthetic nucleoside analog of cytidine, is phosphorylated by cellular enzymes to form emtricitabine 5'-triphosphate. Emtricitabine 5'-triphosphate inhibits the activity of the HIV-1 RT by competing with the natural substrate deoxycytidine 5'-triphosphate and by being incorporated into nascent viral DNA, which results in chain termination. Emtricitabine 5'-triphosphate is a weak inhibitor of mammalian DNA polymerases α, β, ε, and mitochondrial DNA polymerase γ.
Rilpivirine
RPV is a diarylpyrimidine non-nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor of HIV-1 and inhibits HIV-1 replication by non-competitive inhibition of HIV-1 RT. RPV does not inhibit the human cellular DNA polymerases α, β, and mitochondrial DNA polymerase γ.
Tenofovir DF
TDF is an acyclic nucleoside phosphonate diester analog of adenosine monophosphate. TDF requires initial diester hydrolysis for conversion to tenofovir and subsequent phosphorylations by cellular enzymes to form tenofovir diphosphate. Tenofovir diphosphate inhibits the activity of HIV-1 RT by competing with the natural substrate deoxyadenosine 5'-triphosphate and, after incorporation into DNA, by DNA chain termination. Tenofovir diphosphate is a weak inhibitor of mammalian DNA polymerases α, β, and mitochondrial DNA polymerase γ.
Antiviral Activity
Emtricitabine, Rilpivirine, And TDF
The triple combination of FTC, RPV, and TDF was not antagonistic in cell culture.
Emtricitabine
The antiviral activity of FTC against laboratory and clinical isolates of HIV-1 was assessed in lymphoblastoid cell lines, the MAGI-CCR5 cell line, and peripheral blood mononuclear cells. The 50% effective concentration (EC50) values for FTC were in the range of 0.0013–0.64 μM. FTC displayed antiviral activity in cell culture against HIV-1 clades A, B, C, D, E, F, and G (EC50 values ranged from 0.007–0.075 μM) and showed strain specific activity against HIV-2 (EC50 values ranged from 0.007–1.5 μM). In drug combination studies of FTC with nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors (abacavir, lamivudine, stavudine, tenofovir, zidovudine), non-nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors (delavirdine, EFV, nevirapine, and RPV), and protease inhibitors (amprenavir, nelfinavir, ritonavir, saquinavir), no antagonistic effects were observed.
Rilpivirine
RPV exhibited activity against laboratory strains of wild-type HIV-1 in an acutely infected T-cell line with a median EC50 value for HIV-1IIIB of 0.73 nM. RPV demonstrated limited activity in cell culture against HIV-2 with a median EC50 value of 5220 nM (range 2510–10,830 nM). RPV demonstrated antiviral activity against a broad panel of HIV-1 group M (subtype A, B, C, D, F, G, H) primary isolates with EC50 values ranging from 0.07–1.01 nM and was less active against group O primary isolates with EC50 values ranging from 2.88–8.45 nM. The antiviral activity of RPV was not antagonistic when combined with the NNRTIs EFV, etravirine, or nevirapine; the N(t)RTIs abacavir, didanosine, FTC, lamivudine, stavudine, tenofovir, or zidovudine; the PIs amprenavir, atazanavir, darunavir, indinavir, lopinavir, nelfinavir, ritonavir, saquinavir, or tipranavir; the gp41 fusion inhibitor enfuvirtide; the CCR5 co-receptor antagonist maraviroc; or the integrase strand transfer inhibitor raltegravir.
Tenofovir DF
The antiviral activity of tenofovir against laboratory and clinical isolates of HIV-1 was assessed in lymphoblastoid cell lines, primary monocyte/macrophage cells, and peripheral blood lymphocytes. The EC50 values for tenofovir were in the range of 0.04–8.5 μM. Tenofovir displayed antiviral activity in cell culture against HIV-1 clades A, B, C, D, E, F, G, and O (EC50 values ranged from 0.5–2.2 μM) and showed strain specific activity against HIV-2 (EC50 values ranged from 1.6–5.5 μM). In drug combination studies of tenofovir with NRTIs (abacavir, didanosine, FTC, lamivudine, stavudine, and zidovudine), NNRTIs (delavirdine, EFV, nevirapine, and RPV), and PIs (amprenavir, indinavir, nelfinavir, ritonavir, saquinavir), no antagonistic effects were observed.
Resistance
In Cell Culture
Emtricitabine And Tenofovir DF
HIV-1 isolates with reduced susceptibility to FTC or tenofovir have been selected in cell culture. Reduced susceptibility to FTC was associated with M184V/I substitutions in HIV-1 RT. HIV-1 isolates selected by tenofovir expressed a K65R substitution in HIV-1 RT and showed a 2–4 fold reduction in susceptibility to tenofovir. In addition, a K70E substitution in HIV-1 RT has been selected by tenofovir and results in low-level reduced susceptibility to abacavir, FTC, lamivudine, and tenofovir.
Rilpivirine
RPV-resistant strains were selected in cell culture starting from wild-type HIV-1 of different origins and subtypes as well as NNRTI-resistant HIV-1. The frequently observed amino acid substitutions that emerged and conferred decreased phenotypic susceptibility to RPV included: L100I, K101E, V106I and A, V108I, E138K and G, Q, R, V179F and I, Y181C and I, V189I, G190E, H221Y, F227C, and M230I and L.
In HIV-1-Infected Adult Subjects With No Antiretroviral Treatment History
In the Week 96 pooled resistance analysis for adult subjects receiving RPV or EFV in combination with FTC/TDF in the Phase 3 clinical trials C209 and C215, the emergence of resistance was greater among subjects’ viruses in the RPV + FTC/TDF arm compared to the EFV + FTC/TDF arm and was dependent on baseline viral load. In the pooled resistance analysis, 61% (47/77) of the subjects who qualified for resistance analysis (resistance analysis subjects) in the RPV + FTC/TDF arm had virus with genotypic and/or phenotypic resistance to RPV compared to 42% (18/43) of the resistance analysis subjects in the EFV + FTC/TDF arm who had genotypic and/or phenotypic resistance to EFV. Moreover, genotypic and/or phenotypic resistance to FTC or tenofovir emerged in viruses from 57% (44/77) of the resistance analysis subjects in the RPV arm compared to 26% (11/43) in the EFV arm.
Emerging NNRTI substitutions in the RPV resistance analysis of subjects’ viruses included V90I, K101E/P/T, E138K/A/Q/G, V179I/L, Y181C/I, V189I, H221Y, F227C/L, and M230L, which were associated with an RPV phenotypic fold change range of 2.6– 621. The E138K substitution emerged most frequently during RPV treatment, commonly in combination with the M184I substitution. The FTC and lamivudine resistance-associated substitutions M184I or V and NRTI resistance-associated substitutions (K65R/N, A62V, D67N/G, K70E, Y115F, K219E/R) emerged more frequently in the RPV resistance analysis subjects than in EFV resistance analysis subjects (See Table 15).
NNRTI- and NRTI-resistance substitutions emerged less frequently in the resistance analysis of viruses from subjects with baseline viral loads of ≤100,000 copies/mL compared to viruses from subjects with baseline viral loads of >100,000 copies/mL: 23% (10/44) compared to 77% (34/44) of NNRTI-resistance substitutions and 20% (9/44) compared to 80% (35/44) of NRTI-resistance substitutions. This difference was also observed for the individual FTC/lamivudine and tenofovir resistance substitutions: 22% (9/41) compared to 78% (32/41) for M184I/V and 0% (0/8) compared to 100% (8/8) for K65R/N. Additionally, NNRTI and/or NRTI-resistance substitutions emerged less frequently in the resistance analysis of the viruses from subjects with baseline CD4 + cell counts ≥200 cells/mm³ compared to the viruses from subjects with baseline CD4 + cell counts <200 cells/mm³: 32% (14/44) compared to 68% (30/44) of NNRTI-resistance substitutions and 27% (12/44) compared to 73% (32/44) of NRTI-resistance substitutions.
Table 15 : Proportion of Frequently Emerging Reverse Transcriptase Substitutions in the HIV-1 Virus of Resistance Analysis Adult Subjectsa Who Received RPV or EFV in Combination with FTC/TDF from Pooled Phase 3 TMC278-C209 and TMC278-C215 Trials in the Week 96 Analysis
|
C209 and C215
N=1096 |
RPV + FTC/TDF
N=550 |
EFV + FTC/TDF
N=546 |
| Subjects who Qualified for Resistance Analysis |
14% (77/550) |
8% (43/546) |
| Subjects with Evaluable Postbaseline Resistance Data |
70 |
31 |
| Emergent NNRTI Substitutionsb |
| Any |
63% (44/70) |
55% (17/31) |
| V90I |
14% (10/70) |
0 |
| K101E/P/T/Q |
19% (13/70) |
10% (3/31) |
| K103N |
1% (1/70) |
39% (12/31) |
| E138K/A/Q/G |
40% (28/70) |
0 |
| E138K + M184Ic |
30% (21/70) |
0 |
| V179I/D |
6% (4/70) |
10% (3/31) |
| Y181C/I/S |
13% (9/70) |
3% (1/31) |
| V189I |
9% (6/70) |
0 |
| H221Y10% (7/70)0Emergent NRTI Substitutionsd |
| Any |
63% (44/70) |
32% (10/31) |
| M184I/V |
59% (41/70) |
26% (8/31) |
| K65R/N |
11 % (8/70) |
6% (2/31) |
| A62V, D67N/G, K70E, Y115F, or K219E/Re |
20% (14/70) |
3% (1/31) |
a Subjects who qualified for resistance analysis
b V90, L100, K101, K103, V106, V108, E138, V179, Y181, Y188, V189, G190, H221, P225, F227, and M230
c This combination of NRTI and NNRTI substitutions is a subset of those with the E138K.
d A62V, K65R/N, D67N/G, K70E, L74I, Y115F, M184V/I, L210F, K219E/R
e These substitutions emerged in addition to the primary substitutions M184V/I or K65R; A62V (n=2), D67N/G (n=3), K70E (n=4), Y115F (n=2), K219E/R (n=8) in RPV resistance analysis subjects. |
In Virologically Suppressed HIV-1-Infected Adult Subjects
Study 106: Through Week 48, 4 subjects who switched to COMPLERA (4 of 469 subjects, 0.9%) and 1 subject who maintained their ritonavir-boosted protease inhibitor-based regimen (1 of 159 subjects, 0.6%) developed genotypic and/or phenotypic resistance to a study drug. All 4 of the subjects who had resistance emergence on COMPLERA had evidence of FTC resistance and 3 of the subjects had evidence of RPV resistance.
Cross Resistance
Rilpivirine, Emtricitabine, and Tenofovir DF:
In Cell Culture
No significant cross-resistance has been demonstrated between RPV-resistant HIV-1 variants and FTC or tenofovir, or between FTC- or tenofovir-resistant variants and RPV.
Rilpivirine
Site-Directed NNRTI Mutant Virus
Cross-resistance has been observed among NNRTIs. The single NNRTI substitutions K101P, Y181I, and Y181V conferred 52-fold, 15-fold, and 12-fold decreased susceptibility to RPV, respectively. The combination of E138K and M184I showed 6.7-fold reduced susceptibility to RPV compared to 2.8-fold for E138K alone. The K103N substitution did not show reduced susceptibility to RPV by itself. However, the combination of K103N and L100I resulted in a 7-fold reduced susceptibility to RPV. In another study, the Y188L substitution resulted in a reduced susceptibility to RPV of 9-fold for clinical isolates and 6-fold for site-directed mutants. Combinations of 2 or 3 NNRTI resistance-associated substitutions gave decreased susceptibility to RPV (fold change range of 3.7–554) in 38% and 66% of mutants, respectively.
In HIV-1-Infected Adult Subjects With No Antiretroviral Treatment History
Considering all available cell culture and clinical data, any of the following amino acid substitutions, when present at baseline, are likely to decrease the antiviral activity of RPV: K101E, K101P, E138A, E138G, E138K, E138R, E138Q, V179L, Y181C, Y181I, Y181V, Y188L, H221Y, F227C, M230I, M230L, and the combination of L100I + K103N.
Cross-resistance to EFV, etravirine, and/or nevirapine is likely after virologic failure and development of RPV resistance. In a pooled 96-week analysis for adult subjects receiving RPV in combination with FTC/TDF in the Phase 3 clinical trials TMC278-C209 and TMC278-C215, 43 of the 70 (61%) RPV resistance analysis subjects with postbaseline resistance data had virus with decreased susceptibility to RPV (≥2.5 fold change). Of these, 84% (n=36/43) were resistant to EFV (≥3.3-fold change), 88% (n=38/43) were resistant to etravirine (≥3.2-fold change), and 60% (n=26/43) were resistant to nevirapine (≥6-fold change). In the EFV arm, 3 of the 15 (20%) EFV resistance analysis subjects had viruses with resistance to etravirine and RPV, and 93% (14/15) had resistance to nevirapine. Virus from subjects experiencing virologic failure on RPV in combination with FTC/TDF developed more NNRTI resistance-associated substitutions conferring more cross-resistance to the NNRTI class and had a higher likelihood of cross-resistance to all NNRTIs in the class than subjects who failed on EFV.
Emtricitabine
FTC-resistant isolates (M184V/I) were cross-resistant to lamivudine but retained susceptibility in cell culture to didanosine, stavudine, tenofovir, zidovudine, and NNRTIs (delavirdine, EFV, nevirapine, and RPV). HIV-1 isolates containing the K65R substitution, selected in vivo by abacavir, didanosine, and tenofovir, demonstrated reduced susceptibility to inhibition by FTC. Viruses harboring substitutions conferring reduced susceptibility to stavudine and zidovudine (M41L, D67N, K70R, L210W, T215Y/F, K219Q/E), or didanosine (L74V), remained sensitive to FTC. HIV-1 containing the substitutions associated with NNRTI resistance K103N or RPV-associated substitutions were susceptible to FTC.
Tenofovir DF
The K65R and K70E substitutions selected by tenofovir are also selected in some HIV-1-infected patients treated with abacavir or didanosine. HIV-1 isolates with the K65R and K70E substitutions also showed reduced susceptibility to FTC and lamivudine. Therefore, cross-resistance among these NRTIs may occur in patients whose virus harbors the K65R substitution. HIV-1 isolates from patients (N=20) whose HIV-1 expressed a mean of 3 zidovudine-associated RT amino acid substitutions (M41L, D67N, K70R, L210W, T215Y/F, or K219Q/E/N) showed a 3.1-fold decrease in the susceptibility to tenofovir.
Subjects whose virus expressed an L74V substitution without zidovudine resistance-associated substitutions (N=8) had reduced response to TDF. Limited data are available for patients whose virus expressed a Y115F substitution (N=3), Q151M substitution (N=2), or T69 insertion (N=4), all of whom had a reduced response.
HIV-1 containing the substitutions associated with NNRTI resistance K103N and Y181C, or RPV-associated substitutions, were susceptible to tenofovir.
Animal Toxicology And/Or Pharmacology
Tenofovir DF
Tenofovir and TDF administered in toxicology studies to rats, dogs, and monkeys at exposures (based on AUCs) greater than or equal to 6-fold those observed in humans caused bone toxicity. In monkeys the bone toxicity was diagnosed as osteomalacia. Osteomalacia observed in monkeys appeared to be reversible upon dose reduction or discontinuation of tenofovir. In rats and dogs, the bone toxicity manifested as reduced bone mineral density. The mechanism(s) underlying bone toxicity is unknown.
Evidence of renal toxicity was noted in 4 animal species. Increases in serum creatinine, BUN, glycosuria, proteinuria, phosphaturia, and/or calciuria and decreases in serum phosphate were observed to varying degrees in these animals. These toxicities were noted at exposures (based on AUCs) 2–20 times higher than those observed in humans. The relationship of the renal abnormalities, particularly the phosphaturia, to the bone toxicity is not known.
Clinical Studies
Adult Subjects
In HIV-1-Infected Adult Subjects With No Antiretroviral Treatment History
The efficacy of COMPLERA is based on the analyses of 48- and 96-week data from two randomized, double-blind, controlled studies (Study C209 [ECHO] and TRUVADA subset of Study C215 [THRIVE]) in treatment-naïve, HIV-1-infected subjects (N=1368). The studies are identical in design with the exception of the background regimen (BR). Subjects were randomized in a 1:1 ratio to receive either RPV 25 mg (N=686) once daily or EFV 600 mg (N=682) once daily in addition to a BR. In Study C209 (N=690), the BR was FTC/TDF. In Study C215 (N=678), the BR consisted of 2 NRTIs: FTC/TDF (60%, n=406), lamivudine/zidovudine (30%, n=204), or abacavir + lamivudine (10%, n=68).
For subjects who received FTC/TDF (N=1096) in studies C209 and C215, the mean age was 37 years (range 18–78), 78% were male, 62% were White, 24% were Black, and 11% were Asian. The mean baseline CD4 + cell count was 265 cells/mm³ (range 1–888) and 31% had CD4 + cell counts <200 cells/mm³. The median baseline plasma HIV-1 RNA was 5 log10 copies/mL (range 2–7). Subjects were stratified by baseline HIV-1 RNA. Fifty percent of subjects had baseline viral load ≤100,000 copies/mL, 39% of subjects had baseline viral load between 100,000 copies/mL to 500,000 copies/mL, and 11% of subjects had baseline viral load >500,000 copies/mL.
Treatment outcomes through 96 weeks for the subset of subjects receiving FTC/TDF in studies C209 and C215 (Table 16) are generally consistent with treatment outcomes for all participating subjects (presented in the prescribing information for Edurant). The incidence of virologic failure was higher in the RPV arm than the EFV arm at Week 96. Virologic failures and discontinuations due to adverse events mostly occurred in the first 48 weeks of treatment.
Table 16 : Pooled Virologic Outcome of Randomized Treatment of Studies C209 and C215 at Week 96 in Adult Subjects With No Antiviral Treatment History in Combination with FTC/TDF) at Week 96a
|
RPV + FTC/TDF
N=550 |
EFV + FTC/TDF
N=546 |
| HIV-1 RNA <50 copies/mLb |
77% |
77% |
| HIV-1 RNA ≥50 copies/mLc |
14% |
8% |
| No Virologic Data at Week 96 Window |
| Reasons |
| Discontinued study due to adverse event or deathd |
4% |
9% |
| Discontinued study for other reasonse and the last available HIV-1 RNA <50 copies/mL (or missing) |
4% |
6% |
| Missing data during window but on study |
<1% |
<1% |
| HIV-1 RNA <50 copies/mL by Baseline HIV-1 RNA (copies/mL) |
| ≤100,000 |
83% |
80% |
| >100,000 |
71% |
74% |
| HIV-1 RNA ≥50 copies/mLc by Baseline HIV-1 RNA (copies/mL) |
| ≤100,000 |
7% |
5% |
| >100,000 |
22% |
12% |
| HIV-1 RNA <50 copies/mL by Baseline CD4 + Cell Count (cells/mm³) |
| <200 |
68% |
72% |
| ≥200 |
82% |
79% |
| HIV-1 RNA ≥50 copies/mLc by Baseline CD4 + Cell Count (cells/mm³) |
| <200 |
27% |
12% |
| ≥200 |
8% |
7% |
a Analyses were based on the last observed viral load data within the Week 96 window (Week 90–103).
b Predicted difference (95% CI) of response rate is 0.5% (–4.5% to 5.5%) at Week 96.
c Includes subjects who had ≥50 copies/mL in the Week 96 window, subjects who discontinued early due to lack or loss of efficacy, subjects who discontinued for reasons other than an adverse event, death, or lack or loss of efficacy and at the time of discontinuation had a viral load value of ≥50 copies/mL, and subjects who had a switch in background regimen that was not permitted by the protocol.
d Includes subjects who discontinued due to an adverse event or death if this resulted in no on-treatment virologic data in the Week 96 window.
e Includes subjects who discontinued for reasons other than an adverse event, death, or lack or loss of efficacy, e.g., withdrew consent, loss to follow-up, etc. |
Based on the pooled data from studies C209 and C215, the mean CD4 + cell count increase from baseline at Week 96 was 226 cells/mm³ for RPV + FTC/TDF-treated subjects and 223 cells/mm³ for EFV + FTC/TDF-treated subjects.
In Virologically Suppressed HIV-1-Infected Adult Subjects
The efficacy and safety of switching from a ritonavir-boosted protease inhibitor in combination with two NRTIs to COMPLERA was evaluated in Study 106, a randomized, open-label study in virologically suppressed HIV-1-infected adults. Subjects had to be on either their first or second antiretroviral regimen with no history of virologic failure, have no current or past history of resistance to any of the three components of COMPLERA, and must have been suppressed (HIV-1 RNA <50 copies/mL) for at least 6 months prior to screening. Subjects were randomized in a 2:1 ratio to either switch to COMPLERA at baseline (COMPLERA arm, N=317), or stay on their baseline antiretroviral regimen for 24 weeks (SBR arm, N=159) and then switch to COMPLERA for an additional 24 weeks (N=52). Subjects had a mean age of 42 years (range 19–73), 88% were male, 77% were White, 17% were Black, and 17% were Hispanic/Latino. The mean baseline CD4 + cell count was 584 cells/mm³ (range 42–1484). Randomization was stratified by use of TDF and/or lopinavir/ritonavir in the baseline regimen.
Treatment outcomes are presented in Table 17.
Table 17 : Virologic Outcomes of Study GS-US-264-0106 in Virologically Suppressed Subjects
|
COMPLERA Week 48a
N=317 |
Stayed on Baseline Regimen (SBR) Week 24b
N=159 |
| HIV-1 RNA <50 copies/mLc |
89% (283/317) |
90% (143/159) |
| HIV-1 RNA >50 copies/mLd |
3% (8/317) |
5% (8/159) |
| No Virologic Data at Week 24 Window |
| Discontinued study drug due to AE or deathe |
2% (7/317) |
0% |
| Discontinued study drug due to other reasons and last available HIV-1 RNA <50 copies/mLf |
5% (16/317) |
3% (5/159) |
| Missing data during window but on study drug |
1% (3/317) |
2% (3/159) |
a Week 48 window is between Day 295 and 378 (inclusive).
b For subjects in the SBR arm who maintained their baseline regimen for 24 weeks and then switched to COMPLERA, the Week 24 window is between Day 127 and first dose day on COMPLERA.
c Predicted difference (95% CI) of response rate for switching to COMPLERA at Week 48 compared to staying on baseline regimen at Week 24 (in absence of Week 48 results from the SBR group by study design) is –0.7% (–6.4% to 5.1%).
d Includes subjects who had HIV-1 RNA ≥50 copies/mL in the time window, subjects who discontinued early due to lack or loss of efficacy, and subjects who discontinued for reasons other than an adverse event or death and at the time of discontinuation had a viral load value of ≥50 copies/mL.
e Includes subjects who discontinued due to adverse event or death at any time point from Day 1 through the time window if this resulted in no virologic data on treatment during the specified window.
f Includes subjects who discontinued for reasons other than an adverse event, death, or lack or loss of efficacy, e.g., withdrew consent, loss to follow-up, etc. |
Pediatric Subjects
The pharmacokinetics, safety, and efficacy of RPV in combination with other antiretroviral agents was evaluated in a single-arm, open-label Phase 2 trial in antiretroviral treatment-naïve HIV-1-infected pediatric subjects 12 to less than 18 years of age and weighing at least 32 kg (TMC-C213). Thirty-six (36) subjects were enrolled with a median age of 14.5 years (range 12 to 17 years), and were 55.6% female, 88.9% Black, and 11.1% Asian. The majority of subjects (24/36) received RPV in combination with FTC and TDF. Of these 24 subjects, 20 had baseline HIV RNA ≤100,000 copies/mL. The baseline characteristics and efficacy outcomes at Week 48 are further described below for the 20 subjects.
The median baseline plasma HIV-1 RNA and CD4 + cell count were 49,550 (range 2060 to 92,600 copies/mL) and 437.5 cells/mm³ (range 123 to 983 cells/mm³), respectively. At Week 48, 80% (16/20) of the subjects had HIV RNA <50 copies/mL, 15% (3/20) had HIV RNA ≥50 copies/mL, and one subject discontinued therapy prior to Week 48 and before reaching virologic suppression (HIV RNA <50 copies/mL). At Week 48, the mean increase in CD4 + cell count from baseline was 225 cells/mm³.