CLINICAL PHARMACOLOGY
Mechanism Of Action
Aprepitant is a selective high-affinity antagonist of
human substance P/neurokinin 1 (NK1) receptors. Aprepitant has little or no
affinity for serotonin (5-HT3), dopamine, and corticosteroid receptors.
Aprepitant has been shown in animal models to inhibit emesis induced by
cytotoxic chemotherapeutic agents, such as cisplatin, via central actions.
Animal and human Positron Emission Tomography (PET) studies with aprepitant
have shown that it crosses the blood brain barrier and occupies brain NK1 receptors.
Animal and human studies show that aprepitant augments the antiemetic activity
of the 5-HT3-receptor antagonist ondansetron and the corticosteroid
dexamethasone and inhibits both the acute and delayed phases of
cisplatin-induced emesis.
Pharmacodynamics
Cardiac Electrophysiology
In a randomized, double-blind, positive-controlled,
thorough QTc study, a single 200 mg intravenous dose of fosaprepitant, a
prodrug of aprepitant, had no effect on the QTc interval. In a cross-study comparison,
maximum aprepitant concentrations (Cmax) after a single 200 mg dose of
fosaprepitant were 1.04- and 1.5-fold higher than that achieved with CINVANTI
130 mg dose and 100 mg dose given as a 30-minute infusion, respectively.
Pharmacokinetics
Pharmacokinetic parameters following administration of a
single intravenous 130 mg dose of CINVANTI administered as a 2-minute injection
or 100 mg or 130 mg dose of CINVANTI administered as a 30-minute infusion to
healthy subjects are summarized in Table 8.
Table 8: Aprepitant Pharmacokinetic Parameters (Mean
(± Standard Deviation)) After Single-Dose Intravenous Administration of
CINVANTI
|
CINVANTI 130 mg 2-minute intravenous injection |
CINVANTI 130 mg 30-minute intravenous infusion |
CINVANTI 100 mg 30-minute intravenous infusion |
AUC0-72hr (mcg•hr/mL) |
45.6 (± 15.5) |
43.9 (± 12.7) |
27.8 (± 6.5) |
Cmax (mcg/mL) |
13.9 (±3.8) |
6.1 (± 1.5) |
4.3 (± 1.2) |
Distribution
Aprepitant is greater than 99% bound to plasma proteins.
The mean apparent volume of distribution at steady state (Vdss) was
approximately 70 L in humans.
Aprepitant crosses the blood brain barrier in humans [see
CLINICAL PHARMACOLOGY].
Elimination
Metabolism
Aprepitant undergoes extensive metabolism. In vitro studies
using human liver microsomes indicate that aprepitant is metabolized primarily
by CYP3A4 with minor metabolism by CYP1A2 and CYP2C19. Metabolism is largely
via oxidation at the morpholine ring and its side chains. No metabolism by
CYP2D6, CYP2C9, or CYP2E1 was detected.
In healthy young adults, aprepitant accounts for
approximately 24% of the radioactivity in plasma over 72 hours following a
single oral 300 mg dose of [14C]-aprepitant, indicating a substantial presence
of metabolites in the plasma. Seven metabolites of aprepitant, which are only
weakly active, have been identified in human plasma.
Excretion
Aprepitant is eliminated primarily by metabolism;
aprepitant is not renally excreted. The apparent terminal half-life ranged from
approximately 9 to 13 hours.
Specific Populations
Age: Geriatric Population
Following oral administration of a single 125 mg dose of
aprepitant on Day 1 and 80 mg once daily on Days 2 through 5, the AUC0-24hr of
aprepitant was 21% higher on Day 1 and 36% higher on Day 5 in elderly (65 years
and older) relative to younger adults. The Cmax was 10% higher on Day 1 and 24%
higher on Day 5 in elderly relative to younger adults. These differences are
not considered clinically meaningful [see Use In Specific Populations].
Sex
Following oral administration of a single dose of
aprepitant ranging from 40 mg to 375 mg, the AUC0-24hr and Cmax are 14% and 22%
higher in females as compared with males. The half-life of aprepitant is 25%
lower in females as compared with males and Tmax occurs at approximately the
same time. These differences are not considered clinically meaningful.
Race/Ethnicity
Following oral administration of a single dose of
aprepitant, ranging from 40 mg to 375 mg, the AUC0-24hr and Cmax are
approximately 42% and 29% higher in Hispanics as compared with Caucasians. The
AUC0-24hr and Cmax were 62% and 41% higher in Asians as compared to Caucasians.
There was no difference in AUC0-24hr or Cmax between Caucasians and Blacks.
These differences are not considered clinically meaningful.
Renal Impairment
A single 240 mg oral dose of aprepitant was administered
to patients with severe renal impairment (creatinine clearance less than 30
mL/min/1.73 m² as measured by 24-hour urinary creatinine clearance) and to
patients with end stage renal disease (ESRD) requiring hemodialysis.
In patients with severe renal impairment, the AUC0-∞
of total aprepitant (unbound and protein bound) decreased by 21% and Cmax decreased
by 32%, relative to healthy subjects (creatinine clearance greater than 80
mL/min estimated by Cockcroft-Gault method). In patients with ESRD undergoing
hemodialysis, the AUC0-∞ of total aprepitant decreased by 42% and Cmax decreased
by 32%. Due to modest decreases in protein binding of aprepitant in patients with
renal disease, the AUC of pharmacologically active unbound drug was not
significantly affected in patients with renal impairment compared with healthy
subjects. Hemodialysis conducted 4 or 48 hours after dosing had no significant
effect on the pharmacokinetics of aprepitant; less than 0.2% of the dose was
recovered in the dialysate.
Hepatic Impairment
Following administration of a single 125 mg oral dose of
aprepitant on Day 1 and 80 mg once daily on Days 2 and 3 to patients with mild
hepatic impairment (Child-Pugh score 5 to 6), the AUC0-24hr of aprepitant was
11% lower on Day 1 and 36% lower on Day 3, as compared with healthy subjects
given the same regimen. In patients with moderate hepatic impairment
(Child-Pugh score 7 to 9), the AUC0-24hr of aprepitant was 10% higher on Day 1
and 18% higher on Day 3, as compared with healthy subjects given the same
regimen. These differences in AUC0-24hr are not considered clinically
meaningful. There are no clinical or pharmacokinetic data in patients with
severe hepatic impairment (Child-Pugh score greater than 9) [see Use In Specific
Populations].
Body Mass Index (BMI)
For every 5 kg/m² increase in BMI AUC0-24hr and Cmax of
aprepitant decrease by 11%. BMI of subjects in the analysis ranged from 18 kg/m²
to 36 kg/m². This change is not considered clinically meaningful.
Drug Interactions Studies
Aprepitant is a substrate, and a weak-to-moderate
(dose-dependent) inhibitor of CYP3A4. Aprepitant is also an inducer of CYP3A4,
and CYP2C9. Aprepitant is unlikely to interact with drugs that are substrates
for the P-glycoprotein transporter.
Effects Of Fosaprepitant/Aprepitant On The Pharmacokinetics
Of Other Drugs
CYP3A4 Substrates
Midazolam
Fosaprepitant 150 mg (corresponding to CINVANTI 130 mg)
administered as a single intravenous dose on Day 1 increased the AUC0-∞ of
midazolam by approximately 1.8-fold on Day 1 and had no effect on Day 4 when
midazolam was coadministered as a single oral dose of 2 mg on Days 1 and 4.
Corticosteroids
Dexamethasone
Fosaprepitant administered as a single 150 mg
(corresponding to CINVANTI 130 mg) intravenous dose on Day 1 increased the AUC0-24hr
of dexamethasone, administered as a single 8 mg oral dose on Days 1, 2, and Day
3, by approximately 2-fold on Days 1 and 2 [see DOSAGE AND ADMINISTRATION,
DRUG INTERACTIONS].
Methylprednisolone
When oral aprepitant as a 3-day regimen (125 mg/80 mg/80 mg)
was administered with intravenous methylprednisolone 125 mg on Day 1 and oral
methylprednisolone 40 mg on Days 2 and 3, the AUC of methylprednisolone was
increased by 1.34-fold on Day 1 and by 2.5-fold on Day 3 [see DRUG
INTERACTIONS].
Chemotherapeutic Agents
Docetaxel
In a pharmacokinetic study, oral aprepitant administered
as a 3-day regimen (125 mg/80 mg/80 mg) did not influence the pharmacokinetics
of docetaxel [see DRUG INTERACTIONS].
Vinorelbine
In a pharmacokinetic study, oral aprepitant administered
as a 3-day regimen (125 mg/80 mg/80 mg) did not influence the pharmacokinetics
of vinorelbine to a clinically significant degree [see DRUG INTERACTIONS].
Oral Contraceptives
When oral aprepitant was administered as a 3-day regimen
(125 mg/80 mg/80 mg) with ondansetron and dexamethasone, and coadministered
with an oral contraceptive containing ethinyl estradiol and norethindrone, the
trough concentrations of both ethinyl estradiol and norethindrone were reduced
by as much as 64% for 3 weeks post-treatment [see DRUG INTERACTIONS].
CYP2C9 Substrates (Warfarin, Tolbutamide)
Warfarin
A single 125 mg dose of oral aprepitant was administered
on Day 1 and 80 mg/day on Days 2 and 3 to subjects who were stabilized on
chronic warfarin therapy. Although there was no effect of oral aprepitant on
the plasma AUC of R(+) or S(-) warfarin determined on Day 3, there was a 34%
decrease in S(-) warfarin trough concentration accompanied by a 14% decrease in
the prothrombin time (reported as International Normalized Ratio or INR) 5 days
after completion of dosing with oral aprepitant [see DRUG INTERACTIONS].
Tolbutamide
Oral aprepitant, when given as 125 mg on Day 1 and 80
mg/day on Days 2 and 3, decreased the AUC of tolbutamide by 23% on Day 4, 28%
on Day 8, and 15% on Day 15, when a single dose of tolbutamide 500 mg was
administered prior to the administration of the 3-day regimen of oral
aprepitant and on Days 4, 8, and 15. This effect was not considered clinically
important.
Other Drugs
P-Glycoprotein Substrates
Aprepitant is unlikely to interact with drugs that are
substrates for the P-glycoprotein transporter, as demonstrated by the lack of
interaction of oral aprepitant with digoxin in a clinical drug interaction
study.
5-HT3 Antagonists
In clinical drug interaction studies, aprepitant did not
have clinically important effects on the pharmacokinetics of ondansetron,
granisetron, or hydrodolasetron (the active metabolite of dolasetron).
Effect Of Other Drugs On The Pharmacokinetics Of Fosaprepitant/Aprepitant
Rifampin
When a single 375 mg dose of oral aprepitant was
administered on Day 9 of a 14-day regimen of 600 mg/day of rifampin, a strong
CYP3A4 inducer, the AUC of aprepitant decreased approximately 11-fold and the
mean terminal half-life decreased approximately 3-fold [see DRUG
INTERACTIONS].
Ketoconazole
When a single 125 mg dose of oral aprepitant was
administered on Day 5 of a 10-day regimen of 400 mg/day of ketoconazole, a
strong CYP3A4 inhibitor, the AUC of aprepitant increased approximately 5-fold
and the mean terminal half-life of aprepitant increased approximately 3-fold [see
DRUG INTERACTIONS].
Diltiazem
In a study in 10 patients with mild to moderate
hypertension, administration of 100 mg of fosaprepitant as an intravenous
infusion with 120 mg of diltiazem, a moderate CYP3A4 inhibitor administered
three times daily, resulted in a 1.5-fold increase in the aprepitant AUC and a
1.4-fold increase in the diltiazem AUC.
When fosaprepitant was administered with diltiazem, the
mean maximum decrease in diastolic blood pressure was significantly greater
than that observed with diltiazem alone [24.3 ± 10.2 mm Hg with fosaprepitant
versus 15.6 ± 4.1 mm Hg without fosaprepitant]. The mean maximum decrease in
systolic blood pressure was also greater after co-administration of diltiazem
with fosaprepitant than administration of diltiazem alone [29.5 ± 7.9 mm Hg
with fosaprepitant versus 23.8 ± 4.8 mm Hg without fosaprepitant].
Co-administration of fosaprepitant and diltiazem; however, did not result in
any additional clinically significant changes in heart rate or PR interval,
beyond those changes observed with diltiazem alone [see DRUG INTERACTIONS].
Paroxetine
Coadministration of once daily doses of oral aprepitant
170 mg, with paroxetine 20 mg once daily, resulted in a decrease in AUC by
approximately 25% and Cmax by approximately 20% of both aprepitant and
paroxetine. This effect was not considered clinically important.
Clinical Studies
The safety and efficacy of CINVANTI have been established
based on adequate and well-controlled adult studies of a single-dose of
intravenous fosaprepitant, a prodrug of aprepitant, and a 3-day regimen of oral
aprepitant in chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting associated with HEC and
MEC, respectively. Below is a description of the results of these adequate and
well-controlled studies of fosaprepitant/aprepitant in these conditions.
Prevention Of Nausea And Vomiting Associated With HEC
In a randomized, parallel, double-blind,
active-controlled study, 150 mg fosaprepitant as a single intravenous infusion
(N = 1147) was compared to a 3-day oral aprepitant regimen (N = 1175) in
patients receiving a HEC regimen that included cisplatin (≥70 mg/m²). All
patients in both groups received dexamethasone and ondansetron (see Table 9)
Patient demographics were similar between the two treatment groups. Of the
total 2322 patients, 63% were men, 56% White, 26% Asian, 3% American
Indian/Alaska Native, 2% Black, 13% Multi-Racial, and 33% Hispanic/Latino
ethnicity. Patient ages ranged from 19 to 86 years of age, with a mean age of
56 years. Other concomitant chemotherapy agents commonly administered were
fluorouracil (17%), gemcitabine (16%), paclitaxel (15%), and etoposide (12%).
Table 9:Treatment Regimens in HEC Trial*
|
Day 1 |
Day 2 |
Day 3 |
Day 4 |
Intravenous Fosaprepitant Regimen |
Fosaprepitant |
150 mg intravenously over 20 to 30 minutes approximately 30 minutes prior to chemotherapy |
None |
None |
None |
Oral dexamethasone† |
12 mg |
8 mg |
8 mg twice daily |
8 mg twice daily |
Ondansetron |
Ondansetron‡ |
None |
None |
None |
Oral Aprepitant Regimen |
|
|
|
|
Aprepitant capsules |
125 mg |
80 mg |
80 mg |
none |
Oral dexamethasone§ |
12 mg |
8 mg |
8 mg |
8 mg |
Ondansetron |
Ondansetron‡ |
None |
None |
None |
*Fosaprepitant placebo, aprepitant placebo and
dexamethasone placebo (in the evenings on Days 3 and 4) were used to maintain
blinding.
†Dexamethasone was administered 30 minutes prior to chemotherapy treatment on
Day 1 and in the morning on Days 2 through 4. Dexamethasone was also
administered in the evenings on Days 3 and 4. The 12 mg dose of dexamethasone
on Day 1 and the 8 mg once daily dose on Day 2 reflects a dosage adjustment to
account for a drug interaction with the fosaprepitant regimen [see CLINICAL
PHARMACOLOGY].
‡Ondansetron 32 mg intravenous was used in the clinical trial. Although this
dose was used in the clinical trial, this is no longer the currently
recommended dose. Refer to the ondansetron prescribing information for the
current recommended dose.
§Dexamethasone was administered 30 minutes prior to chemotherapy treatment on
Day 1 and in the morning on Days 2 through 4. The 12 mg dose of dexamethasone
on Day 1 and the 8 mg once daily dose on Days 2 through 4 reflects a dosage
adjustment to account for a drug interaction with the oral aprepitant regimen [see CLINICAL PHARMACOLOGY]. |
The efficacy of a single-dose of intravenous
fosaprepitant was evaluated based on the primary and secondary endpoints listed
in Table 10 and was shown to be non-inferior to that of the 3-day oral
aprepitant regimen with regard to complete response in each of the evaluated
phases. The pre-specified non-inferiority margin for complete response in the
overall phase was 7%. The pre-specified non-inferiority margin for complete
response in the delayed phase was 7.3%. The pre-specified non-inferiority
margin for no vomiting in the overall phase was 8.2%.
Table 10: Percent of Patients Receiving HEC Responding
by Treatment Group and Phase — Cycle 1
ENDPOINTS |
Intravenous Fosaprepitant Regimen
(N = 1106)* % |
Oral aprepitant Regimen
(N = 1134)* % |
Difference†(95% CI) |
PRIMARY ENDPOINT |
Complete Response‡ |
Overall§ |
71.9 |
72.3 |
-0.4 (-4.1, 3.3) |
SECONDARY ENDPOINTS |
Complete Response‡ |
Delayed phase¶ |
74.3 |
74.2 |
0.1 (-3.5, 3.7) |
No Vomiting |
Overall§ |
72.9 |
74.6 |
-1.7 (-5.3, 2.0) |
*N: Number of patients included in the primary analysis
of complete response.
†Difference and Confidence interval (CI) were calculated using the method
proposed by Miettinen and Nurminen and adjusted for gender.
‡Complete Response = no vomiting and no use of rescue therapy.
§Overall = 0 to 120 hours post-initiation of cisplatin chemotherapy.
¶Delayed phase = 25 to 120 hours post-initiation of cisplatin chemotherapy. |
Prevention Of Nausea And Vomiting Associated With MEC
In a multicenter, randomized, double-blind,
parallel-group, clinical study in breast cancer patients, a 3-day oral
aprepitant regimen was compared with a standard of care therapy in patients
receiving a MEC regimen that included cyclophosphamide 750 to1500 mg/m²; or
cyclophosphamide 500 to1500 mg/m² and doxorubicin (≤ 60 mg/m²) or
epirubicin (≤ 100 mg/m²). Patients (N = 866) were randomized to either
the aprepitant regimen (N = 438) or standard therapy (N = 428). The treatment
regimens are defined in Table 11.
In this study, the most common chemotherapy combinations
were cyclophosphamide plus doxorubicin (61%); and cyclophosphamide plus
epirubicin and fluorouracil (22%).
Of the 438 patients who were randomized to receive the
oral aprepitant regimen, 99.5% were women. Of these, approximately 80% were
White, 8% Black, 8% Asian, 4% Hispanic, and < 1% Other. The
aprepitant-treated patients in this clinical study ranged from 25 to 78 years
of age, with a mean age of 53 years; 70 patients were 65 years or older, with
12 patients being over 74 years.
Table 11: Treatment Regimens in MEC Triala
|
Day 1 |
Day 2 |
Day 3 |
Oral Aprepitant Regimen |
Aprepitant |
125 mg orallyb |
80 mg orally |
80 mg orally |
Dexamethasone |
12 mg orallyc |
None |
None |
Ondansetron |
8 mg orally x 2 dosesd |
None |
None |
Standard Therapy |
Dexamethasone |
20 mg orally |
None |
None |
Ondansetron |
8 mg orally x 2 doses |
8 mg orally twice daily |
8 mg orally twice daily |
a Aprepitant placebo and dexamethasone placebo
were used to maintain binding.
b 1 hour prior to chemotherapy.
c Dexamethasone was administered 30 minutes prior to chemotherapy
treatment on Day 1.
d Ondansetron was administered 30 to 60 minutes prior to
chemotherapy treatment on Day 1 and 8 hours after first ondansetron dose. |
The antiemetic activity of oral aprepitant was evaluated
based on the following endpoints in which emetic episodes included vomiting,
retching, or dry heaves:
Primary endpoint:
- complete response (defined as no emetic episodes and no
use of rescue therapy as recorded in patient diaries) in the overall phase (0
to 120 hours post-chemotherapy)
Other prespecified endpoints:
- no emesis (defined as no emetic episodes regardless of
use of rescue therapy)
- no nausea (maximum nausea visual analogue scale [VAS]
score < 5 mm on a 0 to 100 mm scale)
- no significant nausea (maximum VAS score < 25 mm on a
0 to 100 mm scale)
- complete protection (defined as no emetic episodes, no
use of rescue therapy, and a maximum VAS score < 25 mm on a 0 to 100 mm
scale)
- complete response during the acute and delayed phases.
A summary of the key results from this study is shown in
Table 12.
Table 12: Percent of Patients Receiving MEC Responding
by Treatment Group and Phase – Cycle 1
ENDPOINTS |
Oral Aprepitant Regimen
(N = 433)a % |
Standard Therapy
(N = 424)a % |
p-Value |
PRIMARY ENDPOINTb |
Complete Response |
51 |
42 |
0.015 |
OTHER PRESPECIFIED ENDPOINTSb |
No Emesis |
76 |
59 |
NSc |
No Nausea |
33 |
33 |
NS |
No Significant Nausea |
61 |
56 |
NS |
No Rescue Therapy |
59 |
56 |
NS |
Complete Protection |
43 |
37 |
NS |
a N: Number of patients included in the
primary analysis of complete response.
b Overall: 0 to 120 hours post-chemotherapy treatment.
c NS when adjusted for prespecified multiple comparisons rule;
unadjusted p-value < 0.001. |
In this study, a statistically significantly (p = 0.015)
higher proportion of patients receiving the oral aprepitant regimen in Cycle 1
had a complete response (primary endpoint) during the overall phase compared
with patients receiving standard therapy. The difference between treatment
groups was primarily driven by the “No Emesis Endpoint”, a principal component
of this composite primary endpoint. In addition, a higher proportion of
patients receiving the oral aprepitant regimen in Cycle 1 had a complete
response during the acute (0 to 24 hours) and delayed (25 to 120 hours) phases
compared with patients receiving standard therapy; however, the treatment group
differences failed to reach statistical significance, after multiplicity
adjustments.
Additional Patient-Reported Outcomes
In this study, in patients receiving MEC, the impact of
nausea and vomiting on patients’ daily lives was assessed in Cycle 1 using the
FLIE. A higher proportion of patients receiving the oral aprepitant regimen
reported minimal or no impact on daily life (64% versus 56%). This difference
between treatment groups was primarily driven by the “No Vomiting Domain” of
this composite endpoint.
Multiple-Cycle Extension
Patients receiving MEC were permitted to continue into
the Multiple-Cycle extension of the study for up to 3 additional cycles of
chemotherapy. Antiemetic effect for patients receiving the aprepitant regimen
is maintained during all cycles.
Oral Aprepitant Postmarketing Trial
In another multicenter, randomized, double-blind,
parallel-group, clinical study in 848 cancer patients, the 3-day oral
aprepitant regimen (N = 430) was compared with a standard of care therapy (N =
418) in patients receiving a MEC regimen that included any intravenous dose of
oxaliplatin, carboplatin, epirubicin, idarubicin, ifosfamide, irinotecan,
daunorubicin, doxorubicin; intravenous cyclophosphamide (less than 1500 mg/m²);
or intravenous cytarabine (greater than 1 g/m²).
Of the 430 patients who were randomized to receive the
oral aprepitant regimen, 76% were women and 24% were men. The distribution by
race was 67% White, 6% Black or African American, 11% Asian, and 12%
multiracial. Classified by ethnicity, 36% were Hispanic and 64% were
non-Hispanic. The aprepitant-treated patients in this clinical study ranged
from 22 to 85 years of age, with a mean age of 57 years; approximately 59% of
the patients were 55 years or older with 32 patients being over 74 years.
Patients receiving the aprepitant regimen were receiving chemotherapy for a
variety of tumor types including 50% with breast cancer, 21% with
gastrointestinal cancers including colorectal cancer, 13% with lung cancer and
6% with gynecological cancers.
The antiemetic activity of aprepitant was evaluated based
on no vomiting (with or without rescue therapy) in the overall period (0 to 120
hours post-chemotherapy) and complete response (defined as no vomiting and no
use of rescue therapy) in the overall period.
A summary of the key results from this study is shown in
Table 13.
Table 13: Percent of Patients Receiving MEC Responding
by Treatment Group for Study 2 – Cycle 1
ENDPOINTS |
Oral Aprepitant Regimen
(N = 430)a % |
Standard Therapy
(N = 418)a % |
p-Value |
No Vomiting Overall |
76 |
62 |
< 0.0001 |
Complete Response Overall |
69 |
56 |
0.0003 |
a N = Number of patients who received
chemotherapy treatment, study drug, and had at least one post-treatment
efficacy evaluation. |
In this study, a statistically significantly higher
proportion of patients receiving the oral aprepitant regimen (76%) in Cycle 1
had no vomiting during the overall phase compared with patients receiving
standard therapy (62%). In addition, a higher proportion of patients receiving
the aprepitant regimen (69%) in Cycle 1 had a complete response in the overall
phase (0 to 120 hours) compared with patients receiving standard therapy (56%).
In the acute phase (0 to 24 hours following initiation of chemotherapy), a
higher proportion of patients receiving aprepitant compared to patients
receiving standard therapy were observed to have no vomiting (92% and 84%,
respectively) and complete response (89% and 80%, respectively). In the delayed
phase (25 to 120 hours following initiation of chemotherapy), a higher
proportion of patients receiving aprepitant compared to patients receiving
standard therapy were observed to have no vomiting (78% and 67%, respectively)
and complete response (71% and 61%, respectively).
In a subgroup analysis by tumor type, a numerically
higher proportion of patients receiving aprepitant were observed to have no
vomiting and complete response compared to patients receiving standard therapy.
For gender, the difference in complete response rates between the aprepitant
and standard regimen groups was 14% in females (64.5% and 50.3%, respectively)
and 4% in males (82.2% and 78.2%, respectively) during the overall phase. A
similar difference for gender was observed for the no vomiting endpoint.