Clinical Pharmacology for Bimzelx
Mechanism Of Action
Bimekizumab-bkzx is a humanized immunoglobulin IgG1/ κ monoclonal antibody with two identical antigen binding regions that selectively bind to human interleukin 17A (IL-17A), interleukin 17F (IL-17F), and interleukin 17-AF cytokines, and inhibits their interaction with the IL-17 receptor complex. IL-17A and IL-17F are naturally occurring cytokines that are involved in normal inflammatory and immune responses. Bimekizumab-bkzx inhibits the release of proinflammatory cytokines and chemokines.
Pharmacodynamics
Elevated levels of IL-17A and IL-17F are found in lesional psoriatic skin. Bimekizumab-bkzx exposure-response relationships to serum biomarkers, including IL-17A and IL-17F, and the time course of such pharmacodynamic responses are unknown.
Immune Response To Inactivated Or Non-Live Vaccines
Healthy individuals who received a single 320 mg dose of BIMZELX two weeks prior to vaccination with an inactivated seasonal influenza vaccine had similar antibody responses compared to individuals who did not receive BIMZELX prior to vaccination. The effectiveness of inactivated seasonal influenza vaccines and other inactivated and non-live vaccines has not been evaluated in patients treated with BIMZELX.
Pharmacokinetics
Bimekizumab-bkzx pharmacokinetics are comparable in adult patients with moderate to severe plaque psoriasis, psoriatic arthritis, non-radiographic axial spondyloarthritis, and ankylosing spondylitis.
The median peak plasma concentration of bimekizumab-bkzx was 25 (range: 12-50) μg/mL and was reached in 3-4 days. Bimekizumab-bkzx exhibited dose-proportional pharmacokinetics in patients with plaque psoriasis over a dose range of 64 mg to 480 mg (0.2 to 1.5 times the approved recommended dosage) following subcutaneous administration.
Absorption
The absolute bioavailability of bimekizumab-bkzx was 70% in healthy subjects.
Distribution
The median volume of distribution at steady state was 11.2 L.
Elimination
The median (coefficient of variation %) clearance (CL/F) of bimekizumab-bkzx was 0.337 L/day (32.7%). The mean terminal elimination half-life was 23 days, with clearance independent of dose.
Metabolism
Bimekizumab-bkzx is expected to be degraded into small peptides by catabolic pathways.
Specific Populations
No significant differences in the pharmacokinetics of bimekizumab-bkzx were observed based on age (≥18 years).
Body Weight
The average plasma concentration in adult subjects weighing ≥120 kg was predicted to be at least 30% lower than those weighing < 120 kg (median of 87 kg) [see DOSAGE AND ADMINISTRATION Section].
Immunogenicity
The observed incidence of anti-drug antibodies (ADA) is highly dependent on the sensitivity and specificity of the assay. Differences in assay methods preclude meaningful comparisons of the incidence of ADA in the studies described below with the incidence of ADA in other studies, including those of BIMZELX or of other bimekizumab products.
Across the pivotal trials in all indications, there was no identified clinically significant effect of anti-bimekizumab-bkzx antibodies, including neutralizing anti-drug antibodies, on safety or effectiveness of BIMZELX.
Plaque Psoriasis
During the 52–56-week treatment period in Trial-Ps-1, Trial-Ps-2, and Trial-Ps-3 [see Clinical Studies], 116/257 (45%) of BIMZELX-treated subjects (at the recommended dosage) developed anti-bimekizumab-bkzx antibodies (also referred to as ADA). Of the BIMZELX-treated subjects who developed ADA in these trials, approximately 16% had neutralizing antibodies.
Psoriatic Arthritis
During the 52-week treatment period in Trial PsA-1 (see Clinical Studies, 201/431 (47%) of subjects treated with BIMZELX had ADA, and 18% had neutralizing ADA.
Non-Radiographic Axial Spondyloarthritis
During the 52-week treatment period in Trial-nr-axSpA [see Clinical Studies], 68/119 (57%) of BIMZELX-treated subjects had anti-bimekizumab-bkzx as ADA, and approximately 25% had neutralizing ADA.
Ankylosing Spondylitis
During the 52-week treatment period in Trial AS-1 [see Clinical Studies], 86/194 (44%) of BIMZELX-treated subjects had anti-bimekizumab-bkzx ADA, and approximately 20% had neutralizing ADA.
Clinical Studies
Plaque Psoriasis
Three multicenter, randomized, double-blind trials [Trial-Ps-1 (NCT03370133), Trial-Ps-2 (NCT03410992), and Trial-Ps-3 (NCT03412747)] enrolled a total of 1480 subjects 18 years of age and older with moderate to severe plaque psoriasis who had a body surface area (BSA) involvement of ≥10%, an Investigator’s Global Assessment (IGA) score of ≥3 (“moderate”) in the overall assessment of psoriasis on a severity scale of 0 to 4, and a Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI) score ≥12.
In Trial-Ps-1, 567 subjects were randomized to receive either BIMZELX 320 mg by subcutaneous injection every 4 weeks, ustekinumab (for subjects weighing ≤100kg, 45 mg initially and 4 weeks later, then every 12 weeks; for subjects weighing >100kg, 90 mg initially and 4 weeks later, then every 12 weeks), or placebo through Week 52. At Week 16, subjects originally randomized to placebo received BIMZELX 320 mg every 4 weeks through Week 52.
In Trial-Ps-2, 435 subjects were randomized to either BIMZELX 320 mg by subcutaneous injection every 4 weeks or placebo. At Week 16, subjects who achieved a PASI 90 response continued into a 40-week randomized withdrawal period. Subjects originally randomized to BIMZELX 320 mg every 4 weeks were re-randomized to either BIMZELX 320 mg every 4 weeks or BIMZELX 320 mg every 8 weeks or placebo. Subjects originally randomized to placebo continued to receive placebo if they were PASI 90 responders. Subjects who did not achieve a PASI 90 response at week 16 entered an open-label escape arm and received BIMZELX 320 mg every 4 weeks for 12 weeks. Subjects who relapsed, defined as having a less than PASI 75 response compared to baseline, during the randomized withdrawal period also entered the 12-week escape arm.
In Trial-Ps-3, 478 subjects were randomized to receive either BIMZELX 320 mg by subcutaneous injection every 4 weeks through week 56, BIMZELX 320 mg every 4 weeks through week 16 followed by BIMZELX every 8 weeks through week 56, or adalimumab (80 mg as an initial dose followed by 40 mg every other week starting 1 week after initial dose through Week 24) followed by BIMZELX 320 mg every 4 weeks through Week 56.
In Trial-Ps1, Trial-Ps-2, and Trial-Ps-3, 71% of the subjects were male and 84% of the subjects were White, with a mean age of 45 years and a mean weight of 89 kg. At baseline, subjects had a median baseline PASI score of 18, median baseline for BSA of 20%, and baseline IGA score of 4 (“severe”) in 33% of subjects. A total of 93% subjects had psoriasis of the scalp (Scalp IGA score of ≥1) and a total of 26% of subjects had a history of psoriatic arthritis. Additionally, 38% had received prior biologic therapy.
Clinical Response At Week 16 (Trial-Ps-1 And Trial-Ps-2)
Trial-Ps-1 and Trial-Ps-2 responses at Week 16 compared to placebo for the two co-primary endpoints:
- The proportion of subjects who achieved an IGA score of 0 (“clear”) or 1 (“almost clear”) with at least a 2-grade improvement from baseline
- The proportion of subjects who achieved at least a 90% reduction from baseline PASI (PASI 90)
Secondary endpoints included the proportion of subjects who achieved PASI 100, IGA 0, and Scalp IGA response (defined as Scalp IGA score of 0 [clear] or 1 [almost clear] with at least 2-grade of improvement from baseline) at Week 16, and PASI 75 at Week 4. In addition, secondary endpoints included assessment of psoriasis symptoms (itching, pain, and scaling) measured by the Patient Symptom Diary (PSD) at Week 16.
The proportion of subjects who achieved IGA 0 or 1, PASI 90, IGA 0, and PASI 100 response at Week 16 are presented in Table 3.
Table 3: Efficacy Results at Week 16 in BIMZELX- or Placebo-Treated Adults with Plaque Psoriasis in Trial-Ps-1 and Trial-Ps-2
|
Trial-Ps-1 |
Trial-Ps-2 |
BIMZELX
320 mg
every 4 weeks
(N=321)
n (%) |
Placebo
(N=83)
n (%) |
BIMZELX
320 mg
every 4 weeks
(N=349)
n (%) |
Placebo
(N=86)
n (%) |
| IGA 0 or 1 (“clear” or “almost clear”) a |
270 (84%) |
4 (5%) |
323 (93%) |
1 (1%) |
| Difference (95% CI) |
79% (73%, 85%) |
91% (88%, 95%) |
| PASI 90a |
273 (85%) |
4 (5%) |
317 (91%) |
1 (1%) |
| Difference (95% CI) |
80% (74%, 86%) |
90% (86%, 93%) |
| IGA 0 (“clear”) |
188 (59%) |
0 (0%) |
243 (70%) |
1 (1%) |
| Difference (95% CI) |
59% (53%, 64%) |
69% (64%, 74%) |
| PASI 100 |
188 (59%) |
0 (0%) |
238 (68%) |
1 (1%) |
| Difference (95% CI) |
59% (53%, 64%) |
67% (62%, 73%) |
| a Co-primary endpoints |
Examination of age, gender, race, baseline IGA score and previous treatment with systemic or biologic agents did not identify differences in response to BIMZELX among these subgroups at Week 16.
A greater proportion of subjects randomized to BIMZELX achieved PASI 75 at Week 4 in both trials compared to placebo. In Trial-Ps-1, 77% of subjects treated with BIMZELX achieved PASI 75 compared to 2% treated with placebo. In Trial-Ps-2, 76% of subjects treated with BIMZELX achieved PASI 75 compared to 1% treated with placebo.
Among subjects with Scalp IGA score of at least 2 at baseline, a greater proportion of subjects randomized to BIMZELX achieved Scalp IGA response at Week 16 in both trials compared to placebo. In Trial-Ps-1, 84% (240/285) of subjects treated with BIMZELX achieved Scalp IGA response compared to 15% (11/72) of placebo treated subjects. In Trial-Ps-2, 92% (286/310) of subjects treated with BIMZELX achieved Scalp IGA response compared to 7% (5/74) of placebo treated subjects.
Maintenance And Durability Of Response
In Trial-Ps-2, subjects randomized to BIMZELX every 4 weeks at Week 0 and who were PASI 90 responders at Week 16 were re-randomized to either continue treatment with BIMZELX every 4 weeks, switched to BIMZELX every 8 weeks, or be withdrawn from therapy (i.e., received placebo).
Figure 1 and Figure 2 present the percentage of subjects maintaining IGA score of 0 (“Clear”) or 1 (“Almost Clear”) and PASI 90, respectively, through Week 56 after re-randomization at Week 16.
Figure 1: Percentage of Subjects Maintaining IGA 0 or 1 through Week 56 after Re-Randomization at Week 16
For IGA 0 or 1 responders at Week 16 who were re-randomized to treatment withdrawal (i.e., placebo), the median time to loss of IGA 0 or 1 response was approximately 24 weeks. Among these subjects with IGA score of 2 at retreatment, 58% (14/24) achieved IGA score of 0 within 12 weeks of restarting treatment with BIMZELX 320 mg every 4 weeks. Among these subjects with IGA score ≥ 3 at retreatment, 87% (34/39) regained IGA 0 or 1 response with at least 2-grade improvement from retreatment within 12 weeks of restarting treatment with BIMZELX 320 mg every 4 weeks.
Figure 2: Percentage of Subjects Maintaining PASI 90 through Week 56 after Re-Randomization at Week 16
For PASI 90 responders at Week 16 who were re-randomized to treatment withdrawal (i.e., placebo), the median time to loss of PASI 90 response was approximately 24 weeks.
Patient Reported Outcomes
Greater improvements in itch, pain, and scaling at Week 16 with BIMZELX compared to placebo were observed in both trials as measured by the Patient Symptom Diary (PSD).
Psoriatic Arthritis
The safety and efficacy of BIMZELX were assessed in 1,112 subjects in two multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled studies [Trial PsA-1 (NCT 03895203) and Trial PsA-2 (NCT 03896581)] in subjects 18 years and older with active psoriatic arthritis (PsA).
Subjects in these studies had a diagnosis of PsA of at least 6 months based on Classification Criteria for Psoriatic Arthritis (CASPAR), a median duration of 4.6 years at baseline, and active disease with ≥3 tender joint count and ≥3 swollen joint count. Subjects with each subtype of PsA were enrolled in these studies, including polyarticular symmetric arthritis (63.5%), oligoarticular asymmetric arthritis (25.9%), distal interphalangeal joint predominant (4.4%), spondylitis predominant (4.2%), and arthritis mutilans (1.5%). At baseline, 56% of subjects had ≥3% Body Surface Area (BSA) with active plaque psoriasis. At baseline across both studies, 32% and 12% of subjects had enthesitis and dactylitis, respectively, 58% of subjects had psoriatic nail disease, and 53% of subjects were receiving concomitant methotrexate.
The PsA-1 study evaluated 852 biologic-naïve subjects, who were treated with either BIMZELX 160 mg every 4 weeks up to Week 52, adalimumab 40 mg every 2 weeks up to Week 52 (active reference arm), or placebo. Subjects receiving placebo were switched to BIMZELX every 4 weeks at Week 16 to Week 52.
In this study, 78% of subjects had received prior treatment with ≥ 1 conventional DMARDs (cDMARDs), and 22 % of subjects had no prior treatment with cDMARDs. At baseline, 58% of subjects were receiving concomitant methotrexate (MTX), 11% were receiving concomitant cDMARDs other than MTX, and 31% were receiving no cDMARDs. The PsA-2 study evaluated 400 anti-TNFα experienced subjects (inadequate response or intolerance to treatment), who were treated with BIMZELX 160 mg every 4 weeks or placebo up to Week 16. In this study, 43% of subjects were receiving concomitant MTX, 8% were receiving concomitant cDMARDs other than MTX, and 50% were receiving no cDMARDs.
For both studies, the primary endpoint was the proportion of subjects who achieved an America College of Rheumatology (ACR) 50 response at Week 16.
Clinical Response
In both studies, treatment with BIMZELX resulted in significant improvement in disease activity, as measured by ACR, compared to placebo at Week 16 (see Table 4). Responses in Trial PsA-2 (anti-TNF experienced) were similar to Trial PsA-1.
Table 4: Clinical Responses at Week 16 in Trial PsA-1 and Trials PsA-2
|
Trial PsA-1 – bDMARD naïve |
Trial PsA-2 – anti-TNFα experienced |
| Endpoint |
BIMZELX
160 mg
Q4W
N=431
n(%) |
Placebo
N=281
n(%) |
Difference from Placebo**
(95% CI) |
BIMZELX
160 mg
Q4W
N=267
n(%) |
Placebo
N=133
n(%) |
Difference from Placebo**
(95% CI) |
| ACR 20 Response |
| Week 16 |
268
(62.2) |
67
(23.8) |
38.3
(31.6, 45.1) |
179
(67.0) |
21
(15.8) |
51.3
(42.9, 59.6) |
| ACR 50 Response |
| Week 16 |
189
(43.9)* |
28
(10.0) |
33.9
(28.0, 39.7) |
116
(43.4)* |
9
(6.8) |
36.7
(29.4, 44.0) |
| ACR 70 Response |
| Week 16 |
105
(24.4) |
12
(4.3) |
20.1
(15.4,
24.8) |
71
(26.6) |
1
(0.8) |
25.8
(15.6,
35.7)*** |
CI= confidence interval
* Multiplicity-controlled p<0.001
**95% CI based on normal approximation
***Exact 95% CI used |
The percentage of subjects achieving ACR50 responses in Trial PsA-1 by visit through Week 16 is shown in Figure 3. Similar responses were seen in Trial PsA-2 up to Week 16.
Figure 3: Percent of Subjects Achieving ACR 50 Responses in Trial PsA-1 through Week 16
The results of the components of the ACR response criteria are shown in Table 5.
Table 5: Mean change from Baselin in ACR Component Scores at Week 16 in Trial PsA-1 and Trial PsA-2
|
Trial PsA-1 – bDMARD naïve |
Trial PsA-2 anti-TNFα experienced |
Placebo
(N=281) |
BIMZELX 160
mg Q4W
(N=431) |
Placebo
(N=133) |
BIMZELX 160
mg Q4W
(N=267) |
| Number of swollen joints |
| Baseline |
9.5 |
9.0 |
10.3 |
9.7 |
| Mean change at Week 16 |
-3.0 |
-6.6 |
-2.0 |
-7.0 |
| Number of Tender Joints |
| Baseline |
17.1 |
16.8 |
19.3 |
18.4 |
| Mean change at Week 16 |
-3.2 |
-10.0 |
-2.4 |
-10.9 |
| Patient’s Assessment of Pain |
| Baseline |
56.8 |
53.7 |
61.7 |
58.3 |
| Mean change at Week 16 |
-6.2 |
-23.6 |
-4.5 |
-27.7 |
| Patient’s Global Assessment |
| Baseline |
58.6 |
54.4 |
63.0 |
60.5 |
| Mean change at Week 16 |
-7.7 |
-26.3 |
-5.5 |
-31.8 |
| Physician Global Assessment |
| Baseline |
57.3 |
57.2 |
57.7 |
59.3 |
| Mean change at Week 16 |
-12.5 |
-37.4 |
-6.8 |
-49.4 |
| Health Assessment Questionnaire- Disability Index (HAQ-DI) |
| Baseline |
0.9 |
0.8 |
1.0 |
1.0 |
| Mean Change at Week 16 |
-0.1 |
-0.3* |
-0.1 |
-0.4* |
| High sensitivity C-reactive protein (hsCRP) mg/L |
| Baseline |
11.4 |
8.7 |
11.6 |
12.4 |
Mean Change at
Week 16 |
-2.4 |
-4.2 |
3.6 |
-7.0 |
Multiple Imputation (MI) is used for all endpoints presented in Table 5. *p<0.001 reference-based imputation versus placebo adjusted for
multiplicity. |
Treatment with BIMZELX resulted in improvement in dactylitis and enthesitis in subjects with pre-existing dactylitis or enthesitis, compared to placebo.
In subjects with coexistent plaque psoriasis receiving BIMZELX, the skin lesions of psoriasis improved with treatment, relative to placebo, as measured by the Psoriasis Area Severity Index (PASI 90) at Week 16.
Radiographic Response
In Trial PsA-1, inhibition of progression of structural damage was assessed radiographically and expressed as the change from baseline in the Van der Heijde modified total Sharp Score (vdHmTSS) and its components, the Erosion Score (ES) and the Joint Space Narrowing score (JSN), at Week 16 (see Table 6).
BIMZELX significantly inhibited the rate of progression of joint damage at Week 16 in the overall population compared to placebo. The change from Baseline in erosion subscores contributed more to the change from Baseline in vdHmTSS total score than the change from Baseline in joint narrowing subscore. The percentage of subjects with no radiographic joint damage progression (defined as a change from baseline in mTSS of ≤0.0) from randomization to Week 16 was 77% for BIMZELX and 69% for placebo in the overall population. Similar responses were achieved in the population with elevated hs-CRP and/or at least 1 bone erosion (75% for BIMZELX and 67% for placebo).
Table 6: Change in vdHmTSS in PsA-1 at Week 16
|
Placebo |
BIMZELX 160 mg
Q4W |
Difference from Placebo (95% CI)a |
| Overall population |
(N=269) |
(N=420) |
|
| Baseline mean (SE) |
12.34 (1.37) |
12.47 (1.46) |
|
| Mean change from baseline at Week 16 (SE) |
0.32 (0.09) |
0.04 (0.04)* |
-0.26
(-0.29, -0.23) |
* p≤0.001 versus placebo. p-values are based on reference-based imputation using difference in LS Mean using an ANCOVA model with treatment, bone erosion at Baseline and region as fixed effects and Baseline score as a covariate.
a) Unadjusted differences are shown |
Physical Function
In both studies, subjects treated with BIMZELX showed statistically significant improvement from baseline in physical function compared with placebo as assessed by HAQ-DI at Week 16 (see Table 5).In both studies, a greater proportion of subjects achieved a reduction of at least 0.35 in HAQ-DI score from baseline in the BIMZELX group compared with placebo at Week 16.
Other Health Related Outcomes
Fatigue was assessed by Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy Fatigue Scale (FACIT-Fatigue). Additionally, in both studies at Week 16, subjects treated with BIMZELX showed improvements in FACIT-Fatigue scores.
Non-Radiographic Axial Spondyloarthritis
The efficacy and safety were assessed in 254 patients in one randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study [(Trial nr-axSpA-1 (NCT03928704)] in adult subjects 18 years of age and older with active non-radiographic axial spondyloarthritis. Subjects had to have objective signs of inflammation with elevated C-reactive protein (CRP) level and/or evidence of sacroiliitis on Magnet Resonance Imaging (MRI). Subjects met ASAS classification criteria for axial spondyloarthritis and have active disease as defined by BASDAI greater than or equal to 4, spinal pain of greater than or equal to 4 (0-10 numeric rating scale (NRS)), and no definitive radiographic evidence of structural damage in the sacroiliac joints. At baseline, 73% of subjects had enthesitis. Subjects also had a history of inadequate response to 2 different non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs), or intolerance or contraindication to NSAIDs. Approximately 24% of subjects were on concomitant cDMARDs. Overall, 11% of subjects had received previous treatment (failed or were intolerant to) with anti-TNF alpha agents.
Subjects were randomized to receive BIMZELX 160 mg or placebo every 4 weeks up to the completion of Week 16 assessments. Starting at Week 16, all subjects received BIMZELX every 4 weeks up to Week 52. The primary endpoint was at least 40% improvement in Assessment of Spondyloarthritis International Society (ASAS 40) at Week 16.
Clinical Response
In Trial nr-axSpA-1 Study, treatment with BIMZELX resulted in significant improvements in the measure of disease activity compared to placebo at Week 16 (Table 7).
Table 7: Clinical Response in Trial nr-axSpA-1 at Week 16
|
BIMZELX 160 mg
Q4W
(N=128)
n (%) |
Placebo
(N=126)
n (%) |
Difference from placebo (95% CI)** |
| ASAS 40 response |
61 (47.7%)* |
27 (21.4%) |
26.2 (15.0, 37.5) |
| ASAS 20 response |
88 (68.8%)* |
48 (38.1%) |
30.7 (19.0, 42.3) |
NRI is used
CI= confidence interval
*Multiplicity-controlled p<0.001
**95% CI based on normal approximation |
Similar responses were seen regardless of prior anti-TNF alpha therapy. Treatment with BIMZELX resulted in improvement in enthesitis in subjects with pre-existing enthesitis.
The results of the main components of the ASAS 40 response criteria and other measures of disease activity are shown in Table 8.
Table 8: Components of the ASAS40 Response Criteria and Other Measures of Disease Activity in nr-axSpA Subjects at Baseline and Week 16 in Trial nr-axSpA-1
|
BIMZELX 160 mg
Q4W
(N= 128) |
Placebo
(N=126) |
| ASAS Components |
| Patient Global Assessment (0-10) |
|
|
Baseline
Mean Change from Baseline |
7.1
-3.2 |
6.9
-1.4 |
| Total Spinal Pain (0-10) |
|
|
Baseline
Mean Change from Baseline |
7.3
-3.4 |
7.1
-1.7 |
| BASFI (0-10) |
|
|
Baseline
Mean Change from Baseline |
5.5
-2.5* |
5.3
-1.0 |
| Inflammation (0-10)a |
|
|
Baseline
Mean Change from Baseline |
7.0
-3.6 |
6.9
-1.9 |
| Other Measures of Disease Activity |
| BASDAI Score |
|
|
Baseline
Mean Change from Baseline |
6.9
-3.1* |
6.7
-1.5 |
| BASMI |
|
|
Baseline
Mean Change from Baseline |
2.9
-0.4 |
3.0
-0.1 |
| hsCRP (mg/L) |
|
|
Baseline
Mean Change from Baseline |
11.1
-6.7 |
10.2
0.0 |
a Inflammation is the mean of patient-reported stiffness self-assessments (questions 5 and 6) in BASDAI
BASFI = Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Functional Index
BASMI = Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Metrology Index
BASDAI = Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Index
MI is used for all endpoints presented in Table 8
* Multiplicity-controlled p<0.001 |
The percentage of subjects achieving ASAS40 responses in Trial nr-AxSpa-1 by visit through Week 16 is shown in Figure 4.
Figure 4: Percent of Subjects Achieving ASAS40 Responses in Trial nr-axSpA-1 Week 16
Health Related Quality Of Life
BIMZELX treated subjects showed significantly greater improvement compared to placebo-treated patients at Week 16 in health-related quality of life as measured by the Ankylosing Spondylitis Quality of Life Questionnaire (ASQoL) score.
Ankylosing Spondylitis
The efficacy and safety were assessed in 332 patients in one randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study [Trial AS-1 (NCT03928743)] in adult subjects 18 years of age and older with active ankylosing spondylitis. Subjects had to have documented radiologic evidence (x-ray) fulfilling the Modified New York criteria for AS. Subjects had active disease as defined by BASDAI ≥4 and spinal pain ≥4 on a 0 to 10 numeric rating scale (NRS)(from BASDAI Item 2). Subjects also had a history of inadequate response to 2 different non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs), or intolerance or contraindication to NSAIDs. Approximately 20% of subjects were on concomitant cDMARDs. Overall, 16% of subjects had received previous treatment (failed or were intolerant to) with anti-TNF alpha agents.
Subjects were randomized 2:1 to receive BIMZELX 160 mg or placebo every 4 weeks up to the completion of Week 16 assessments. Starting at Week 16, all subjects received BIMZELX every 4 weeks up to Week 52. The primary endpoint was at least 40% improvement in Assessment of Spondyloarthritis International Society (ASAS 40) at Week 16.
Clinical Response
In Trial AS-1, treatment with BIMZELX resulted in significant improvements in the measure of disease activity compared to placebo at Week 16 (Table 9).
Table 9: Clinical Response in Trial AS-1 at Week 16
|
BIMZELX 160 mg
Q4W
(N=221)
n (%) |
Placebo
(N=111)
n (%) |
Difference from placebo (95% CI)** |
| ASAS 40 response |
99 (44.8%)* |
25 (22.5%) |
22.3 (12.1, 32.4) |
| ASAS 20 response |
146 (66.1%)* |
48 (43.2%) |
22.8 (11.7, 34.0) |
NRI is used
CI= confidence interval
* Multiplicity-controlled p<0.001
**95% CI based on normal approximation |
Similar responses were seen regardless of prior anti-TNF alpha therapy. Treatment with BIMZELX resulted in improvement in enthesitis in subjects with pre-existing enthesitis.
The results of the main components of the ASAS 40 response criteria and other measures of disease activity are shown in Table 10.
Table 10: Components of the ASAS40 Response Criteria and Other Measures of Disease Activity in Ankylosing Spondylitis Subjects at Baseline and Week 16 in Trial AS-1
|
BIMZELX 160 mg
Q4W
(N= 221) |
Placebo
(N=111) |
| ASAS Components |
| Patient Global Assessment (0-10) |
|
|
Baseline
Mean Change from Baseline |
6.6
-2.7 |
6.7
-1.6 |
| Total Spinal Pain (0-10) |
|
|
Baseline
Mean Change from Baseline |
7.1
-3.3 |
7.2
-1.9 |
| BASFI (0-10) |
|
|
Baseline
Mean Change from Baseline* |
5.3
-2.2* |
5.2
-1.1 |
| Inflammation (0-10)a |
|
|
Baseline
Mean Change from Baseline |
6.7
-3.2 |
6.8
-2.1 |
| Other Measures of Disease Activity |
| BASDAI Score |
|
|
Baseline
Mean Change from Baseline |
6.4
-2.9* |
6.5
-1.9 |
| BASMI |
|
|
Baseline
Mean Change from Baseline |
3.9
-0.5** |
3.8
-0.2 |
| hsCRP (mg/L) |
|
|
Baseline
Mean Change from Baseline |
14.7
-8.6 |
13.6
-2.2 |
a Inflammation is the mean of patient-reported stiffness self-assessments (questions 5 and 6) in BASDAI.;
BASFI = Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Functional Index
BASMI = Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Metrology Index
BASDAI = Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Index
MI is used for all endpoints presented in Table 10
*Multiplicity-controlled p<0.001
**Multiplicity-controlled p<0.006 |
The percentage of subjects achieving ASAS40 responses in Trial AS-1 by visit through Week 16 is shown in Figure 5.
Figure 5: Percent of Subjects Achieving ASAS40 Responses in Trial AS-1 Through Week 16
Health Related Quality Of Life
BIMZELX treated subjects showed significantly greater improvement compared to placebo-treated subjects at Week 16 in health-related quality of life as measured by the Ankylosing Spondylitis Quality of Life Questionnaire (ASQoL) score.