Clinical Pharmacology for Bebtelovimab
Mechanism Of Action
Bebtelovimab is a recombinant neutralizing human IgG1λ monoclonal antibody (mAb) to the spike protein of SARS-CoV-2 and is unmodified in the Fc region. Bebtelovimab binds the spike protein with a dissociation constant KD = 0.046 to 0.075 nM and blocks spike protein attachment to the human ACE2 receptor with an IC50 value of 0.39 nM (0.056 mcg/mL).
Pharmacodynamics
The exposure-response relationships of bebtelovimab for viral loads and clinical outcomes are unknown.
Pharmacokinetics
A summary of PK parameters of bebtelovimab following administration of a single dose of 175 mg bebtelovimab is provided in Table 1.
Table 1: Pharmacokinetic Parameters of Bebtelovimab Administered IV in Adults and Pediatric Patients (12 years of age and older weighing at least 40 kg)
|
Bebtelovimab (175 mg)
N=585 |
| Systemic Exposure |
|
| Geometric Mean (%CV) Cmax, mcg/mL |
59.9 (31.9) |
| Geometric Mean (%CV) Cday 29, mcg/mL |
4.55 (70.9) |
| Geometric Mean (%CV) AUCinf, mcg day/mL |
539 (41.5) |
| Distribution |
|
| Geometric Mean (%CV) Vss (L) |
4.55 (25.8) |
| Elimination |
|
| Geometric Mean (%CV) Elimination Half-Life (day) |
11.5 (27.0) |
| Geometric Mean (%CV) Clearance (L/day) |
0.325 (41.5) |
| Abbreviations: CV = coefficient of variation; Cmax = maximum concentration; Cday,29 = drug concentration on day 29; AUCinf = area under the concentration versus time curve from zero to infinity; Vss = steady-state volume of distribution. |
Specific Populations
The PK profile of bebtelovimab was not affected by age, sex, race, or baseline viral load based on a population PK analysis. Body weight had no clinically relevant effect on the PK of bebtelovimab in adults with COVID-19 over the body weight range of 45 kg to 194 kg.
Patients With Renal impairment
Renal impairment is not expected to impact the PK of bebtelovimab, since mAbs with molecular weight >69 kDa are known not to undergo renal elimination. Similarly, dialysis is not expected to impact the PK of bebtelovimab.
Patients With Hepatic Impairment
Bebtelovimab is expected to be degraded into small peptides and amino acids via catabolic pathways in the same manner as other IgG monoclonal antibodies and human endogenous IgG antibodies. Based on population PK analysis, there is no significant difference in PK of bebtelovimab in patients with mild hepatic impairment compared to patients with normal hepatic function. Bebtelovimab has not been studied in patients with moderate or severe hepatic impairment.
Drug Interactions
Bebtelovimab is not renally excreted or metabolized by cytochrome P450 enzymes; therefore, interactions with concomitant medications that are renally excreted or that are substrates, inducers, or inhibitors of cytochrome P450 enzymes are unlikely.
Microbiology
Antiviral Activity
The cell culture neutralization activity of bebtelovimab against SARS-CoV-2 was measured in a dose-response model quantifying plaque reduction using cultured Vero E6 cells.
Bebtelovimab neutralized the USA/WA/1/2020 isolate of SARS-CoV-2 with an estimated EC50 value = 0.044 nM (6.4 ng/mL). Bebtelovimab demonstrated antibody-dependent cell-mediated cytotoxicity on Jurkat reporter cells expressing FcγRIIIa following engagement with target cells expressing spike protein. Bebtelovimab did not elicit complement-dependent cytotoxicity activity in cell-based assays.
Antibody Dependent Enhancement (ADE) Of Infection
The risk that bebtelovimab could mediate viral uptake and replication by immune cells was studied in THP-1 and Raji cell lines and primary human macrophages. In general, experiments with bebtelovimab did not demonstrate productive viral infection in immune cells exposed to SARS-CoV-2 at concentrations of mAb down to 60,000-fold below the approximate EC50 value for neutralization.
Antiviral Resistance
There is a potential risk of treatment failure due to the development of viral variants that are resistant to bebtelovimab.
Nonclinical selection studies using a directed evolution of a yeast displayed Spike RBD identified that substitutions at residues K444, V445, G446, and P499 interfered with bebtelovimab’s ability to block the Spike RBD:ACE-2 interaction. Pseudotyped virus-like particle (VLP) neutralization assays confirmed a 5-fold or greater reduction in susceptibility to bebtelovimab of viral variants with the following substitutions: K444E (>862), K444N (>1,901-fold), K444Q (208-fold), K444T (>1,814-fold), V445A (111-fold), V445F (369-fold), V445G (>730-fold), G446D (69-fold), G446R (7-fold), G446V (8-fold), P499H (>1,606-fold), P499R (>1,870-fold), and P499S (25-fold). In the context of Delta spike protein, G446V substitution had reduced susceptibility of 16.4-fold.
Pseudotyped VLP assessment using the full-length spike genes from different variant lineages indicate that bebtelovimab retains activity (<5-fold reduction) against the Alpha (B.1.1.7, UK origin), Beta (B.1.351, South Africa origin), Gamma (P.1, Brazil origin), Delta (B.1.617.2, India origin), Delta [+K417N] (AY.1/AY.2, India origin), Epsilon (B.1.427/B.1.429, California origin), Iota (B.1.526, New York origin), Kappa (B.1.617.1, India origin), Lambda (C.37, Peru origin), Omicron (B.1.1.529/BA.1, South Africa origin), Omicron [+R346K] (BA.1.1), Omicron BA.2, Omicron BA.2 [+L452Q] (BA.2.12.1), and Omicron BA.4/BA.5 variant lineages (Table 2). The Mu (B.1.621, Colombia origin) variant showed a reduction in susceptibility to bebtelovimab of 5.3-fold.
Table 2: Bebtelovimab Pseudotyped Virus-Like Particle Neutralization Data for SARS-CoV-2 Spike Protein Variants
| Lineage with Spike Protein Substitution |
Country First Identified |
WHO Nomenclature |
Key Substitutions Testeda |
Fold Reduction in Susceptibility |
| B.1.1.7 |
UK |
Alpha |
N501Y |
No changeb |
| B.1.351 |
South Africa |
Beta |
K417N + E484K + N501Y |
No changeb |
| P.1 |
Brazil |
Gamma |
K417T + E484K + N501Y |
No changeb |
| B.1.617.2/AY.3 |
India |
Delta |
L452R + T478K |
No changeb |
| AY.1/AY.2 (B.1.617.2 sublineages) |
India |
Delta [+K417N] |
L452R + T478K + K417N |
No changeb |
| B.1.427/B.1.429 |
USA (California) |
Epsilon |
L452R |
No changeb |
| 8B.1.526c |
USA (New York) |
Iota |
E484K |
No changeb |
| B.1.617.1 |
India |
Kappa |
L452R + E484Q |
No changeb |
| C.37 |
Peru |
Lambda |
L452Q + F490S |
No changeb |
| B.1.621 |
Colombia |
Mu |
R346K + E484K + N501Y |
5.3 |
| B.1.1.529/BA.1 |
South Africa |
Omicron [BA.1] |
G339D + S371L + S373P + S375F + K417N + N440K + G446S + S477N + T478K + E484A + Q493R + G496S + Q498R + N501Y + Y505H |
No changeb |
| BA.1.1 |
South Africa |
Omicron [+R346K] |
BA.1 + R346K |
No changeb |
| BA.2 |
South Africa |
Omicron [BA.2] |
G339D + S371F + S373P + S375F + T376A + D405N + R408S + K417N + N440K + S477N + T478K + E484A + Q493R + Q498R + N501Y + Y505H |
No changeb |
| BA.2.12.1 |
USA |
Omicron [BA.2+L452Q] |
BA.2 + L452Q |
No changeb |
| BA.4/BA.5 |
South Africa |
Omicron [BA.4/BA.5] |
G339D + S371F + S373P + S375F + T376A + D405N + R408S + K417N + N440K + L452R + S477N + T478K + E484A + F486V + Q498R + N501Y + Y505H |
No changeb |
a Key substitutions occurring in the receptor binding domain of spike protein are listed. Pseudotyped VLP contained the full-length spike protein reflective of the consensus sequence for each of the variant lineages.
b No change: <5-fold reduction in susceptibility.
c Isolates of the B.1.526 lineage harbor several spike protein amino acid substitutions, and not all isolates contain the E484K substitution (as of February 2021). |
In authentic SARS-CoV-2 assays, bebtelovimab retained activity (<5-fold reduction) against variant virus isolates from the Alpha (B.1.1.7), Beta (B.1.351), Gamma (P.1), Delta (B.1.617.2/AY.3), Omicron (B.1.1.529/BA.1), Omicron [+R346K] (BA.1.1), Omicron BA.2, and Omicron BA.2 [+L452Q] (BA.2.12.1) lineages, as well as SARS-CoV-2 (USA/WA/1/2020 isolate) engineered to express the L452R substitution present in the Epsilon (B.1.427/B.1.429) lineage or the E484K substitution present in the Iota (B.1.526) lineage (Table 3).
Table 3: Authentica SARS-CoV-2 Neutralization Data for Bebtelovimab
| Lineage with Spike Protein Substitution |
Country First Identified |
WHO Nomenclature |
Key Substitutions Testedb |
Fold Reduction in Susceptibility |
| B.1.1.7 |
UK |
Alpha |
N501Y |
No changec |
| B.1.351 |
South Africa |
Beta |
K417N, E484K, N501Y |
No changec,d |
| P.1 |
Brazil |
Gamma |
K417T, E484K, N501Y |
No changec |
| B.1.617.2/AY.3 |
India |
Delta |
L452R, T478K |
No changec,d |
| B.1.427/B.1.429 |
USA (California) |
Epsilon |
L452R |
No changec |
| B.1.526e |
USA (New York) |
Iota |
E484K |
No changec |
| B.1.1.529/BA.1 |
South Africa |
Omicron |
G339D + S371L + S373P + S375F + K417N + N440K + G446S + S477N + T478K + E484A + Q493R + G496S + Q498R + N501Y + Y505H |
No changec,d |
| BA.1.1 |
South Africa |
Omicron [+R346K] |
BA.1 + R346K |
No changec |
| BA.2 |
South Africa |
Omicron [BA.2] |
G339D + S371F + S373P + S375F + T376A + D405N + R408S + K417N + N440K + S477N + T478K + E484A + Q493R + Q498R + N501Y + Y505H |
No changec,d |
| BA.2.12.1 |
USA |
Omicron [BA.2+L452Q] |
BA.2 + L452Q |
No changec |
a The B.1.1.7, B.1.351, B.1.617.2, B.1.1.529/BA.1, and BA.2 variants were assessed using cell culture-expanded virus isolates and tested using a plaque reduction assay; the B.1.351, P.1, B.1.617.2, B.1.1.529/BA.1, BA.1.1, BA.2, and BA.2.12.1 variants were assessed using cell culture-expanded isolates and tested using a microneutralization assay with a CPE-based endpoint titer to determine the IC>99; the B.1.526/E484K and B.1.427/B.1.429/L452R substitutions were assessed using recombinant SARS-CoV-2 (USA/WA/1/2020 isolate with E484K or L452R) and tested using a plaque reduction assay.
b Key substitutions occurring in receptor binding domain of spike protein which are associated with each lineage.
c No change: <5-fold reduction in susceptibility when compared to ancestral control isolate using the same methodology.
d These viral variants have been tested with two different neutralization methodologies, both yielding <5-fold reductions in susceptibility.
e Isolates of the B.1.526 lineage harbor several spike protein amino acid substitutions, and not all isolates contain the E484K substitution (as of February 2021). |
Genotypic analysis and phenotypic testing are ongoing to monitor for potential bebtelovimab-resistance-associated spike variations in clinical trials. Baseline sequencing data are available for 611 of the subjects in the BLAZE-4 (Arms 9-14) Study. Of these, 552 (90.3%) were infected with a variant of interest or concern, as designated by the WHO. No subject was infected with virus of the Omicron lineage or sub-lineages. The majority of subjects in the trial were infected with Delta (49.9%) and Alpha (28.6%). These were distributed across the treatment groups with Delta and Alpha infection rates of 60.2% and 23.1% in placebo, 31.3% and 41.8% in bebtelovimab alone arms, and 58.3% and 21.9% in the bebtelovimab with bamlanivimab and etesevimab arms, respectively. Gamma and Mu infections comprised 5.6% and 3.8% of the total infections respectively. Subjects infected with Beta, Delta [+K417N], Iota, and Lambda variants were the minority with 0.5%, 0.8%, 0.7%, and 0.5% total infections, respectively. All other subjects in the trial had SARS-CoV-2 infections from either non-WHO classified viruses (3.3%), or the lineage was not able to be determined based on the baseline sequence data (6.4%). Detection of viral variants with a 5-fold or greater reduction in susceptibility to bebtelovimab at baseline has been rare, with only one G446V substitution (8-fold shift) observed transiently out of 611 subjects in the BLAZE-4 (Arms 9-14) study that had baseline sequencing available (0.2%, 1/611).
Analysis of treatment-emergent variants focused on changes at amino acid positions with known phenotypically confirmed bebtelovimab-associated variations (i.e., K444, V445, G446, and P499) in serial viral samples obtained in the BLAZE-4 (Arms 9-14) bebtelovimab Phase 2 Study. Treatment-emergent substitutions detected at ≥15% or ≥50% allele fractions at these positions included K444E/N, V445G, G446V, and P499H/R. These substitutions resulted in a 5-fold or greater reduction in susceptibility to bebtelovimab in pseudotyped VLP assays: K444E (>862), K444N (>1,901-fold), V445G (>730-fold), G446V (8-fold), P499H (>1,606-fold), and P499R (>1,870-fold). Additional treatment-emergent substitutions detected at ≥15% or >50% allele fractions outside the epitope in at least 2 subjects included C379F (n=2) and G404C (n=2), seen in bebtelovimab in combination with bamlanivimab and etesevimab arms.
Considering all substitutions detected at ≥15% allele fraction at positions K444, V445, G446, and P499, 5.5% (11/199) of subjects treated with bebtelovimab alone harbored a variant that was treatment-emergent. This was more frequent than observed in the placebo arm (0%, 0/112), or when bebtelovimab was administered together with bamlanivimab and etesevimab (0.3%, 1/312). The appearance of these treatment-emergent bebtelovimab resistance-associated substitutions was associated with higher viral loads in the subjects in whom they were detected, but none of these subjects were hospitalized. The majority of the variants were first detected on Day 5 (n=3) and Day 7 (n=6) following treatment initiation.
It is possible that bebtelovimab resistance-associated variants could have cross-resistance to other mAbs targeting the receptor binding domain of SARS-CoV-2. The clinical impact is not known.
Immune Response Attenuation
There is a theoretical risk that antibody administration may attenuate the endogenous immune response to SARS-CoV-2 and make patients more susceptible to re-infection.
Animal Toxicology And/Or Pharmacology
In toxicology studies, bebtelovimab had no adverse effects when administered intravenously to rats.
In tissue cross reactivity studies using human adult and fetal tissues, no binding of clinical concern was detected for bebtelovimab.
Antiviral Activity In Vivo
Prophylactic administration of bebtelovimab to male Syrian golden hamsters (n=5 to 8 per group) resulted in 2 to 4 log10 decreases in viral genomic RNA and viral replication (subgenomic RNA) from lung tissue, as well as decreases in lung weight and improvements in body weight compared to controls.
The applicability of these findings to a treatment setting is not known.
Clinical Studies
The data supporting this EUA for treatment of mild-to-moderate COVID-19 are primarily based on analyses of data from the Phase 2 portion of the BLAZE-4 trial (NCT04634409) that enrolled both low risk and high risk subjects (treatment arms 9-14). This trial evaluated the clinical efficacy data from subjects receiving 175 mg bebtelovimab alone and together with 700 mg bamlanivimab and 1,400 mg of etesevimab.
BLAZE-4 is a Phase 1/2, randomized, single-dose clinical trial evaluating treatment of subjects with mild-to-moderate COVID-19 (subjects with COVID-19 symptoms who are not hospitalized). Efficacy of bebtelovimab, alone and together with bamlanivimab and etesevimab, was evaluated in low risk adults (i.e., those not at high-risk to progress to severe COVID-19) in a randomized part of the trial which included a placebo control arm (treatment arms 9-11). Low risk adults were randomized with a 1:1:1 ratio. High-risk adults and pediatric subjects (12 years of age and older weighing at least 40 kg) received open-label active treatments. One cohort of high risk subjects was randomized with 2:1 ratio (treatment arms 12 and 13). Another cohort of high risk subject was enrolled with no randomization (treatment arm 14). The trial enrolled subjects who were not hospitalized and had 1 or more COVID-19 symptoms that were at least mild in severity. Treatment was initiated within 3 days of obtaining the clinical sample for the first positive SARS-CoV-2 viral infection determination.
BLAZE-4 was conducted prior to the emergence of the Omicron variant. No subject in BLAZE-4 was infected with virus of the Omicron lineage or sub-lineages. The majority of participants in the trial were infected with Delta (49.8%) and Alpha (28.6%).
Phase 2 Data From The Placebo-Controlled Portion Of BLAZE-4 (Low Risk Subjects; Treatment Arms 9-11)
In this portion of the trial, adult subjects were treated with a single infusion of bamlanivimab 700 mg, etesevimab 1,400 mg, and bebtelovimab 175 mg (N=127), 175 mg bebtelovimab alone (N=125), or placebo (N=128). The majority (96.8%) of the subjects enrolled in these treatment arms did not meet the criteria for high-risk.
At baseline, median age was 35 years (with 1 placebo subject aged 65 or older); 56% of subjects were female, 79% were White, 36% were Hispanic or Latino, and 19% were Black or African American. Subjects had mild (74%) to moderate (26%) COVID-19; the mean duration of symptoms was 3.6 days; mean viral load by cycle threshold (CT) was 24.63 at baseline. The baseline demographics and disease characteristics were well balanced across treatment arms with the exception of baseline serology status. A higher percentage of subjects in the placebo arm were positive for baseline serology (15% vs. 9% for bamlanivimab, etesevimab, and bebtelovimab together, and 7% for bebtelovimab alone). Participants enrolled in these treatment arms had not received SARS-CoV-2 vaccine at baseline.
The primary endpoint was the proportion of subjects with persistently high viral load (PHVL) by Day 7. PHVL occurred in 26 subjects treated with placebo (21%) as compared to 16 (13%) subjects treated with bamlanivimab 700 mg, etesevimab 1,400 mg, and bebtelovimab 175 mg together [p=0.098], and 17 (14%) subjects treated with bebtelovimab 175 mg alone [p=0.147], a 38% (95% CI: -9%, 65%) and 34% (95% CI: -15%, 62%) relative reduction, respectively.
Secondary endpoints included mean change in viral load from baseline to Day 3, 5, 7, and 11 (Figure 1).
Figure 1: SARS-CoV-2 Viral Load Change from Baseline (Mean ± SE) by Visit from the Placebo-Controlled Portion of BLAZE-4 in Low Risk Adults (700 mg bamlanivimab, 1,400 mg etesevimab, 175 mg bebtelovimab together and 175 mg bebtelovimab alone)
For the secondary endpoint of COVID-19 related hospitalization (defined as ≥24 hours of acute care) or death by any cause by Day 29, these events occurred in 2 (1.6%) subjects treated with placebo as compared with 3 (2.4%) events in subjects treated with bamlanivimab 700 mg, etesevimab 1,400 mg, and bebtelovimab 175 mg together and 2 (1.6%) events in subjects treated with bebtelovimab 175 mg alone. There was 1 subject treated with bamlanivimab 700 mg, etesevimab 1,400 mg, and bebtelovimab 175 mg together who died on Day 5. Conclusions are limited as COVID-19 related hospitalization and death rates are expected to be low in a low risk population.
The median time to sustained symptom resolution as recorded in a trial specific daily symptom diary was 7 days (95%CI: 6, 8 days) for subjects treated with bamlanivimab 700 mg, etesevimab 1,400 mg, and bebtelovimab 175 mg together [p=0.289] and 6 days (95% CI: 5, 7 days) for subjects treated with bebtelovimab 175 mg alone [p=0.003] as compared with 8 days (95% CI: 7, 9 days) for subjects treated with placebo. Symptoms assessed were cough, shortness of breath, feeling feverish, fatigue, body aches and pains, sore throat, chills, and headache. Sustained symptom resolution was defined as absence of any of these symptoms, except for allowance of mild fatigue and cough, in two consecutive assessments.
Phase 2 Data From The Randomized, Open-Label Portion Of BLAZE-4 (High Risk Subjects; Treatment Arms 12-13)
In this portion of the trial, subjects were treated with a single infusion of bamlanivimab 700 mg, etesevimab 1,400 mg, and bebtelovimab 175 mg (N=50) or 175 mg bebtelovimab alone (N=100). The majority (91.3%) of the subjects enrolled in these dose arms meet the criteria for high-risk.
At baseline, median age was 50 years (with 28 subjects aged 65 or older); 52% of subjects were female, 75% were White, 18% were Hispanic or Latino, and 18% were Black or African American. Subjects had mild (75%) to moderate (25%) COVID-19; the mean duration of symptoms was 4.7 days; mean viral load by cycle threshold (CT) was 26.66 at baseline; and 20.7% of subjects had at least one dose of a COVID-19 vaccine. There were 2 pediatric patients enrolled (ages 14 and 17), one in each treatment arm. The baseline demographics and disease characteristics were well balanced across treatment groups.
The primary objective for these treatment arms was to characterize the safety profile of bebtelovimab 175 mg by evaluating adverse events and serious adverse events. Efficacy endpoints included the proportion of subjects with COVID-19 related hospitalization or death by any cause by Day 29, mean change in viral load from baseline to Days 3, 5, 7, and 11 and time to sustained symptom resolution.
The proportion of subjects with COVID-19 related hospitalization (defined as ≥24 hours of acute care) or death by any cause was assessed by Day 29. Events occurred in 2 (4%) subjects treated with bamlanivimab 700 mg, etesevimab 1,400 mg, and bebtelovimab 175 mg together and 3 (3%) subjects treated with bebtelovimab 175 mg alone. There was 1 subject treated with bebtelovimab 175 mg alone who died on Day 34.
Mean changes in viral load from baseline to Day 3, 5, 7, and 11 are shown in Figure 2.
Figure 2: SARS-CoV-2 Viral Load Change from Baseline (Mean ± SE) by Visit from the Open-Label Portion of BLAZE-4 (700 mg bamlanivimab, 1,400 mg etesevimab, 175 mg bebtelovimab together and 175 mg bebtelovimab alone).
The median time to sustained symptom resolution as recorded in a trial specific daily symptom diary was 7 days for subjects treated with bebtelovimab 175 mg alone.
Phase 2 Data From The Non-Randomized, Open-Label Portion Of BLAZE-4 (High Risk Subjects; Treatment Arm 14)
In this portion of the trial, subjects were treated with a single infusion of bamlanivimab 700 mg, etesevimab 1,400 mg, and bebtelovimab 175 mg (N=176). The majority (97.7%) of the subjects enrolled meet the criteria for high-risk.
At baseline, median age was 51 years (with 35 subjects aged 65 or older); 56% of subjects were female, 80% were White, 28% were Hispanic or Latino, and 16% were Black or African American. Subjects had mild (73%) to moderate (27%) COVID-19; the mean duration of symptoms was 4 days; mean viral load by cycle threshold (CT) was 23.45 at baseline; and 31% of subjects had at least one dose of a COVID-19 vaccine. There were 2 pediatric patients enrolled (ages 14 and 15).
The primary objective for this treatment arm was to characterize the safety profile of bamlanivimab 700 mg, etesevimab 1,400 mg, and bebtelovimab 175 mg by evaluating adverse events and serious adverse events. Efficacy endpoints included the proportion of subjects with COVID-19 related hospitalization or death by any cause by Day 29, mean change in viral load from baseline to Days 3, 5, 7, and 11, and time to sustained symptom resolution.
The proportion of subjects with COVID-19 related hospitalization (defined as ≥24 hours of acute care) or death by any cause was assessed by Day 29. Events occurred in 3 subjects (1.7%), and no subjects died.
Mean changes in viral load from baseline to Day 3, 5, 7, and 11 were -1.4, -3.1, -4.0, and -5.4, respectively.
The median time to sustained symptom resolution as recorded in a trial specific daily symptom diary was 8 days.
Overall Benefit-Risk Assessment And Limitations Of Data Supporting The Benefits Of The Product
Based on the data from BLAZE-4, bebtelovimab has been shown to improve symptoms in patients with mild-to-moderate COVID-19. Additionally, a reduction in SARS-CoV-2 viral load on Day 5 was observed relative to placebo, though the clinical significance of this is unclear. The placebo-controlled phase 2 data are limited by enrollment of only subjects without risk factors for progression to severe COVID-19, and the trial was not powered or designed to determine a difference in the clinical outcomes of hospitalization or death between the placebo and bebtelovimab treatment arms [see Phase 2 Data From The Placebo-Controlled Portion Of BLAZE-4 (Low Risk Subjects; Treatment Arms 9-11) ]. Bebtelovimab has been studied in individuals who have risk factors for progression to severe COVID-19, but the efficacy analyses are limited due to the lack of a concurrent placebo control arm for this population [see Phase 2 Data From The Randomized, Open-Label Portion Of BLAZE-4 (High Risk Subjects; Treatment Arms 12-13), Phase 2 Data From The Non-Randomized, Open-Label Portion Of BLAZE-4 (High Risk Subjects; Treatment Arm 14) ].
However, based on the totality of scientific evidence available, including the available Phase 2 and pharmacokinetic data, along with the nonclinical viral neutralization data for Omicron and other variants of concern, it is reasonable to believe that bebtelovimab may be effective for the treatment of patients with mild-to-moderate COVID-19 to reduce the risk of progression to hospitalization or death. In addition, the mechanism of action for bebtelovimab is similar to other neutralizing SARS-CoV-2 monoclonal antibodies, including bamlanivimab and etesevimab, that have data from Phase 3 clinical trials showing a reduction in hospitalization or death in high risk patients infected with other SARS-CoV-2 variants. The safety profile of bebtelovimab is acceptable with monitorable risks and is comparable to other SARS-CoV-2 monoclonal antibodies, including bamlanivimab and etesevimab. Considered together, these data support that the known and potential benefits of treatment with bebtelovimab outweigh the known and potential risks in adults and pediatric patients (12 years of age and older weighing at least 40 kg) with positive results of direct SARS-CoV-2 viral testing and who are at high risk for progression to severe COVID-19, including hospitalization or death, and for whom alternative COVID-19 treatment options approved or authorized by FDA are not accessible or clinically appropriate.
Clinical data summarized above were similar for bebtelovimab alone as compared to the combination of bamlanivimab, etesevimab and bebtelovimab administered together. Bebtelovimab retains activity against currently circulating variants [see Microbiology].