CLINICAL PHARMACOLOGY
Mechanism Of Action
Bevacizumab binds VEGF and prevents the interaction of VEGF to its receptors (Flt-1 and KDR) on
the surface of endothelial cells. The interaction of VEGF with its receptors leads to endothelial cell
proliferation and new blood vessel formation in in vitro models of angiogenesis. Administration of
bevacizumab to xenotransplant models of colon cancer in nude (athymic) mice caused reduction of
microvascular growth and inhibition of metastatic disease progression.
Pharmacokinetics
The pharmacokinetic profile of bevacizumab was assessed using an assay that measures total serum
bevacizumab concentrations (i.e., the assay did not distinguish between free bevacizumab and
bevacizumab bound to VEGF ligand). Based on a population pharmacokinetic analysis of 491
patients who received 1 to 20 mg/kg of Avastin every week, every 2 weeks, or every 3 weeks,
bevacizumab pharmacokinetics are linear and the predicted time to reach more than 90% of steady
state concentration is 84 days. The accumulation ratio following a dose of 10 mg/kg once every
2 weeks is 2.8.
Population simulations of bevacizumab exposures provide a median trough concentration of 80.3
mcg/mL on Day 84 (10th, 90th percentile: 45, 128) following a dose of 5 mg/kg once every two
weeks.
Distribution
The mean (% coefficient of variation [CV%]) central volume of distribution is 2.9 (22%) L.
Elimination
The mean (CV%) clearance is 0.23 (33) L/day. The estimated half-life is 20 days (11 to 50 days).
Specific Populations
The clearance of bevacizumab varied by body weight, sex, and tumor burden. After correcting for
body weight, males had a higher bevacizumab clearance (0.26 L/day vs. 0.21 L/day) and a larger
central volume of distribution (3.2 L vs. 2.7 L) than females. Patients with higher tumor burden (at
or above median value of tumor surface area) had a higher bevacizumab clearance (0.25 L/day vs.
0.20 L/day) than patients with tumor burdens below the median. In AVF2107g, there was no
evidence of lesser efficacy (hazard ratio for overall survival) in males or patients with higher tumor
burden treated with Avastin as compared to females and patients with low tumor burden. Based on
data in specific populations, no dose adjustments for Avastin are needed.
Animal Toxicology And/Or Pharmacology
Rabbits dosed with bevacizumab exhibited reduced wound healing capacity. Using full-thickness
skin incision and partial thickness circular dermal wound models, bevacizumab dosing resulted in
reductions in wound tensile strength, decreased granulation and re-epithelialization, and delayed
time to wound closure.
Clinical Studies
Metastatic Colorectal Cancer (mCRC)
Study AVF2107g
In a double-blind, active-controlled study [AVF2107g (NCT00109070)], 923 patients were
randomized (1:1:1) to placebo with bolus-IFL (irinotecan 125 mg/m2, 5-fluorouracil 500 mg/m2, and
leucovorin 20 mg/m2 given once weekly for 4 weeks every 6 weeks), Avastin (5 mg/kg every
2 weeks) with bolus-IFL, or Avastin (5 mg/kg every 2 weeks) with 5-fluorouracil and leucovorin.
Enrollment to the Avastin with 5-fluorouracil and leucovorin arm was discontinued after enrollment
of 110 patients in accordance with the protocol-specified adaptive design. Avastin was continued
until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity or for a maximum of 96 weeks. The main outcome
measure was overall survival (OS).
The median age was 60 years; 60% were male, 79% were White, 57% had an ECOG performance
status of 0, 21% had a rectal primary and 28% received prior adjuvant chemotherapy. The dominant
site of disease was extra-abdominal in 56% of patients and was the liver in 38% of patients.
The addition of Avastin improved survival across subgroups defined by age (< 65 years, ≥ 65 years)
and sex. Results are presented in Table 9 and Figure 1.
Table 9: Efficacy Results in Study AVF2107g
Efficacy Parameter |
Avastin with bolus-IFL
(N=402) |
Placebo with bolus-IFL
(N=411) |
Overall Survival |
Median (months) |
20.3 |
15.6 |
Hazard ratio
(95% CI) |
0.66
(0.54, 0.81) |
p-valuea |
< 0.001 |
Progression Free Survival |
Median (months) |
10.6 |
6.2 |
Hazard ratio
(95% CI) |
0.54
(0.45, 0.66) |
p-valuea |
< 0.001 |
Overall Response Rate |
Rate (%) |
45% |
35% |
p-valueb |
< 0.01 |
Duration of Response |
Median (months) |
10.4 |
7.1 |
a by stratified log rank test.
b by χ2 test |
Figure 1: Kaplan-Meier Curves for Duration of Survival in Metastatic Colorectal Cancer in
Study AVF2107g
Among the 110 patients randomized to Avastin with 5-fluorouracil and leucovorin, median OS was
18.3 months, median progression-free survival (PFS) was 8.8 months, overall response rate (ORR)
was 39%, and median duration of response was 8.5 months.
Study E3200
E3200 (NCT00025337) was a randomized, open-label, active-controlled study in 829 patients who
were previously treated with irinotecan and 5-fluorouracil for initial therapy for metastatic disease or
as adjuvant therapy. Patients were randomized (1:1:1) to FOLFOX4 (Day 1: oxaliplatin 85 mg/m2
and leucovorin 200 mg/m2 concurrently, then 5-fluorouracil 400 mg/m2 bolus followed by
600 mg/m2 continuously; Day 2: leucovorin 200 mg/m2, then 5-fluorouracil 400 mg/m2 bolus
followed by 600 mg/m2 continuously; every 2 weeks), Avastin (10 mg/kg every 2 weeks prior to
FOLFOX4 on Day 1) with FOLFOX4, or Avastin alone (10 mg/kg every 2 weeks). Avastin was
continued until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. The main outcome measure was OS.
The Avastin alone arm was closed to accrual after enrollment of 244 of the planned 290 patients
following a planned interim analysis by the data monitoring committee based on evidence of
decreased survival compared to FOLFOX4 alone.
The median age was 61 years; 60% were male, 87% were White, 49% had an ECOG performance
status of 0, 26% received prior radiation therapy, and 80% received prior adjuvant chemotherapy,
99% received prior irinotecan with or without 5-fluorouracil for metastatic disease, and 1% received
prior irinotecan and 5-fluorouracil as adjuvant therapy.
The addition of Avastin to FOLFOX4 resulted in significantly longer survival as compared to
FOLFOX4 alone; median OS was 13.0 months vs. 10.8 months [hazard ratio (HR) 0.75 (95%
CI: 0.63, 0.89), p-value of 0.001 stratified log rank test] with clinical benefit seen in subgroups
defined by age (< 65 years, ≥ 65 years) and sex. PFS and ORR based on investigator assessment were
higher in patients receiving Avastin with FOLFOX4.
Study TRC-0301
The activity of Avastin with 5-fluorouracil (as bolus or infusion) and leucovorin was evaluated in a
single arm study [TRC-0301 (NCT00066846)] enrolling 339 patients with mCRC with disease
progression following both irinotecan- and oxaliplatin-based chemotherapy. Seventy-three percent of
patients received concurrent bolus 5-fluorouracil and leucovorin. One objective partial response was
verified in the first 100 evaluable patients for an ORR of 1% (95% CI: 0%, 5.5%).
Study ML18147
ML18147 (NCT00700102) was a prospective, randomized, open-label, multinational, controlled
study in 820 patients with histologically confirmed mCRC who had progressed on a first-line
Avastin containing regimen. Patients were excluded if they progressed within 3 months of initiating
first-line chemotherapy and if they received Avastin for less than 3 consecutive months in the firstline
setting. Patients were randomized (1:1) within 3 months after discontinuing Avastin as first-line
therapy to receive fluoropyrimidine-irinotecan- or fluoropyrimidine-oxaliplatin-based chemotherapy
with or without Avastin (5 mg/kg every 2 weeks or 7.5 mg/kg every 3 weeks). The choice of secondline
therapy was contingent upon first-line chemotherapy. Second-line therapy was administered
until progressive disease or unacceptable toxicity. The main outcome measure was OS. A secondary
outcome measure was ORR.
The median age was 63 years (21 to 84 years); 64% were male, 52% had an ECOG performance
status of 1, 44% had an ECOG performance status of 0, 58% received irinotecan-based therapy as
first-line treatment, 55% progressed on first-line treatment within 9 months, and 77% received their
last dose of Avastin as first-line treatment within 42 days of being randomized. Second-line
chemotherapy regimens were generally balanced between each arm.
The addition of Avastin to fluoropyrimidine-based chemotherapy resulted in a statistically
significant prolongation of OS and PFS. There was no significant difference in ORR. Results are
presented in Table 10 and Figure 2.
Table 10: Efficacy Results in Study ML18147
Efficacy Parameter |
Avastin with Chemotherapy
(N=409) |
Chemotherapy
(N=411) |
Overall Survivala |
|
|
Median (months) |
11.2 |
9.8 |
Hazard ratio (95% CI) |
0.81 (0.69, 0.94) |
Progression-Free Survivalb |
|
|
Median (months) |
5.7 |
4.0 |
Hazard ratio (95% CI) |
0.68 (0.59, 0.78) |
a p = 0.0057 by unstratified log rank test.
b p-value < 0.0001 by unstratified log rank test. |
Figure 2: Kaplan-Meier Curves for Duration of Survival in Metastatic Colorectal Cancer in
Study ML18147
Lack Of Efficacy In Adjuvant Treatment Of Colon Cancer
Lack of efficacy of Avastin as an adjunct to standard chemotherapy for the adjuvant treatment of
colon cancer was determined in two randomized, open-label, multicenter clinical studies.
The first study [BO17920 (NCT00112918)] was conducted in 3451 patients with high-risk stage II
and III colon cancer, who had undergone surgery for colon cancer with curative intent. Patients were
randomized to receive Avastin at a dose equivalent to 2.5 mg/kg/week on either a 2-weekly schedule
with FOLFOX4 (N=1155), or on a 3-weekly schedule with XELOX (N=1145) or FOLFOX4 alone
(N=1151). The main outcome measure was disease free survival (DFS) in patients with stage III
colon cancer.
The median age was 58 years; 54% were male, 84% were White and 29% were ≥ 65 years. Eightythree
percent had stage III disease.
The addition of Avastin to chemotherapy did not improve DFS. As compared to FOLFOX4 alone,
the proportion of stage III patients with disease recurrence or with death due to disease progression
were numerically higher for patients receiving Avastin with FOLFOX4 or with XELOX. The hazard
ratios for DFS were 1.17 (95% CI: 0.98,1.39) for Avastin with FOLFOX4 versus FOLFOX4 alone
and 1.07 (95% CI: 0.90, 1.28) for Avastin with XELOX versus FOLFOX4 alone. The hazard ratios
for OS were 1.31 (95% CI: 1.03, 1.67) and 1.27 (95% CI: 1, 1.62) for the comparison of Avastin
with FOLFOX4 versus FOLFOX4 alone and Avastin with XELOX versus FOLFOX4 alone,
respectively. Similar lack of efficacy for DFS were observed in the Avastin-containing arms
compared to FOLFOX4 alone in the high-risk stage II cohort.
In a second study [NSABP-C-08 (NCT00096278)], patients with stage II and III colon cancer who
had undergone surgery with curative intent, were randomized to receive either Avastin administered
at a dose equivalent to 2.5 mg/kg/week with mFOLFOX6 (N=1354) or mFOLFOX6 alone
(N=1356). The median age was 57 years, 50% were male and 87% White. Seventy-five percent had
stage III disease. The main efficacy outcome was DFS among stage III patients. The HR for DFS
was 0.92 (95% CI: 0.77, 1.10). OS was not significantly improved with the addition of Avastin to
mFOLFOX6 [HR 0.96 (95% CI: 0.75,1.22)].
First-Line Non–Squamous Non–Small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC)
Study E4599
The safety and efficacy of Avastin as first-line treatment of patients with locally advanced,
metastatic, or recurrent non–squamous NSCLC was studied in a single, large, randomized,
active-controlled, open-label, multicenter study [E4599 (NCT00021060)]. A total of 878
chemotherapy-naïve patients with locally advanced, metastatic or recurrent non–squamous NSCLC
were randomized (1:1) to receive six 21-day cycles of paclitaxel (200 mg/m2) and carboplatin
(AUC6) with or without Avastin 15 mg/kg. After completing or discontinuing chemotherapy,
patients randomized to receive Avastin continued to receive Avastin alone until disease progression
or until unacceptable toxicity. The trial excluded patients with predominant squamous histology
(mixed cell type tumors only), CNS metastasis, gross hemoptysis (1/2 teaspoon or more of red
blood), unstable angina, or receiving therapeutic anticoagulation. The main outcome measure was
duration of survival.
The median age was 63 years; 54% were male, 43% were ≥ 65 years, and 28% had ≥5% weight loss
at study entry. Eleven percent had recurrent disease. Of the 89% with newly diagnosed NSCLC,
12% had Stage IIIB with malignant pleural effusion and 76% had Stage IV disease.
OS was statistically significantly longer for patients receiving Avastin with paclitaxel and
carboplatin compared with those receiving chemotherapy alone. Median OS was 12.3 months vs.
10.3 months [HR 0.80 (95% CI: 0.68, 0.94), final p-value of 0.013, stratified log-rank test]. Based on
investigator assessment which was not independently verified, patients were reported to have longer
PFS with Avastin with paclitaxel and carboplatin compared to chemotherapy alone. Results are
presented in Figure 3.
Figure 3: Kaplan-Meier Curves for Duration of Survival in First-Line Non-Squamous Non-
Small Cell Lung Cancer in Study E4599
In an exploratory analysis across patient subgroups, the impact of Avastin on OS was less robust in
the following subgroups: women [HR0.99 (95% CI: 0.79, 1.25)], patients ≥ 65 years [HR0.91 (95%
CI: 0.72, 1.14)] and patients with ≥ 5% weight loss at study entry [HR0.96 (95% CI: 0.73, 1.26)].
Study BO17704
The safety and efficacy of Avastin in patients with locally advanced, metastatic or recurrent
non-squamous NSCLC, who had not received prior chemotherapy was studied in another
randomized, double-blind, placebo controlled study [BO17704 (NCT00806923)]. A total of
1043 patients were randomized (1:1:1) to receive cisplatin and gemcitabine with placebo, Avastin
7.5 mg/kg or Avastin 15 mg/kg. The main outcome measure was PFS. Secondary outcome measure
was OS.
The median age was 58 years; 36% were female and 29% were ≥ 65 years. Eight percent had
recurrent disease and 77% had Stage IV disease.
PFS was significantly higher in both Avastin-containing arms compared to the placebo arm [HR
0.75 (95% CI 0.62, 0.91), p-value of 0.0026 for Avastin 7.5 mg/kg and HR 0.82 (95% CI 0.68; 0.98),
p-value of 0.0301 for Avastin 15 mg/kg]. The addition of Avastin to cisplatin and gemcitabine failed
to demonstrate an improvement in the duration of OS [HR 0.93 (95% CI: 0.78; 1.11), p-value of
0.420 for Avastin 7.5 mg/kg and HR 1.03 (95% CI: 0.86, 1.23), p-value of 0.761 for Avastin
15 mg/kg].
Recurrent Glioblastoma (GBM)
Study EORTC 26101
The safety and efficacy of Avastin were evaluated in a multicenter, randomized (2:1), open-label
study in patients with recurrent GBM (EORTC 26101, NCT01290939). Patients with first
progression following radiotherapy and temozolomide were randomized (2:1) to receive Avastin
(10 mg/kg every 2 weeks) with lomustine (90 mg/m2 every 6 weeks) or lomustine (110 mg/m2 every
6 weeks) alone until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. Randomization was stratified by
World Health Organization performance status (0 vs. >0), steroid use (yes vs. no), largest tumor
diameter (≤ 40 vs. > 40 mm), and institution. The main outcome measure was OS. Secondary
outcome measures were investigator-assessed PFS and ORR per the modified Response Assessment
in Neuro-oncology (RANO) criteria, health related quality of life (HRQoL), cognitive function, and
corticosteroid use.
A total of 432 patients were randomized to receive lomustine alone (N=149) or Avastin with
lomustine (N=283). The median age was 57 years; 24.8% of patients were ≥ 65 years. The majority
of patients with were male (61%); 66% had a WHO performance status score > 0; and in 56% the
largest tumor diameter was ≤ 40 mm. Approximately 33% of patients randomized to receive
lomustine received Avastin following documented progression.
No difference in OS (HR 0.91, p -value of 0.4578) was observed between arms; therefore, all
secondary outcome measures are descriptive only. PFS was longer in the Avastin with lomustine
arm [HR 0.52 (95% CI: 0.41, 0.64)] with a median PFS of 4.2 months in the Avastin with lomustine
arm and 1.5 months in the lomustine arm. Among the 50% of patients receiving corticosteroids at the
time of randomization, a higher percentage of patients in the Avastin with lomustine arm
discontinued corticosteroids (23% vs. 12%).
Study AVF3708g And Study NCI 06-C-0064E
One single arm single center study (NCI 06-C-0064E) and a randomized noncomparative
multicenter study [AVF3708g (NCT00345163)] evaluated the efficacy and safety of Avastin 10
mg/kg every 2 weeks in patients with previously treated GBM. Response rates in both studies were
evaluated based on modified WHO criteria that considered corticosteroid use. In AVF3708g, the
response rate was 25.9% (95% CI: 17%, 36.1%) with a median duration of response of 4.2 months
(95% CI: 3, 5.7). In Study NCI 06-C-0064E, the response rate was 19.6% (95% CI: 10.9%, 31.3%)
with a median duration of response of 3.9 months (95% CI: 2.4, 17.4).
Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma (mRCC)
Study BO17705
Patients with treatment-naïve mRCC were evaluated in a multicenter, randomized, double-blind,
international study [BO17705 (NCT00738530)] comparing interferon alfa Avastin versus placebo. A
total of 649 patients who had undergone a nephrectomy were randomized (1:1) to receive either
Avastin (10 mg/kg every 2 weeks; N= 327) or placebo (every 2 weeks; N= 322) with interferon alfa
(9 MIU subcutaneously three times weekly for a maximum of 52 weeks). Patients were treated until
disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. The main outcome measure was investigator-assessed
PFS. Secondary outcome measures were ORR and OS.
The median age was 60 years (18 to 82 years); 70% were male and 96% were White. The study
population was characterized by Motzer scores as follows: 28% favorable (0), 56% intermediate
(1-2), 8% poor (3−5), and 7% missing.
PFS was statistically significantly prolonged among patients receiving Avastin compared to placebo;
median PFS was 10.2 months vs. 5.4 months [HR 0.60 (95% CI: 0.49, 0.72), p-value < 0.0001,
stratified log-rank test]. Among the 595 patients with measurable disease, ORR was also
significantly higher (30% vs. 12%, p-value < 0.0001, stratified CMH test). There was no
improvement in OS based on the final analysis conducted after 444 deaths, with a median OS of
23 months in the patients receiving Avastin with interferon alfa and 21 months in patients receiving
interferon alone [HR 0.86, (95% CI 0.72, 1.04)]. Results are presented in Figure 4.
Figure 4: Kaplan-Meier Curves for Progression-Free Survival in Metastatic Renal Cell
Carcinoma in Study BO17705
Persistent, Recurrent, Or Metastatic Cervical Cancer
Study GOG-0240
Patients with persistent, recurrent, or metastatic cervical cancer were evaluated in a randomized,
four-arm, multi-center study comparing Avastin with chemotherapy versus chemotherapy alone
[GOG-0240 (NCT00803062)]. A total of 452 patients were randomized (1:1:1:1) to receive
paclitaxel and cisplatin with or without Avastin, or paclitaxel and topotecan with or without Avastin.
The dosing regimens for Avastin, paclitaxel, cisplatin and topotecan were as follows:
- Day 1: Paclitaxel 135 mg/m2 over 24 hours, Day 2: cisplatin 50 mg/m2 with Avastin;
- Day 1: Paclitaxel 175 mg/m2 over 3 hours, Day 2: cisplatin 50 mg/m2 with Avastin;
- Day 1: Paclitaxel 175 mg/m2 over 3 hours with cisplatin 50 mg/m2 with Avastin;
- Day 1: Paclitaxel 175 mg/m2 over 3 hours with Avastin, Days 1-3: topotecan IV 0.75 mg/m2
over 30 minutes
Patients were treated until disease progression or unacceptable adverse reactions. The main outcome
measure was OS. Secondary outcome measures included ORR.
The median age was 48 years (20 to 85 years). Of the 452 patients randomized at baseline, 78% of
patients were White, 80% had received prior radiation, 74% had received prior chemotherapy
concurrent with radiation, and 32% had a platinum-free interval of less than 6 months. Patients had a
GOG performance status of 0 (58%) or 1 (42%). Demographic and disease characteristics were
balanced across arms.
Results are presented in Table 11 and Figure 5.
Figure 5: Kaplan-Meier Curves for Overall Survival in Persistent, Recurrent, or Metastatic
Cervical Cancer in Study GOG-0240
Table 11: Efficacy Results in Study GOG-0240
Efficacy Parameter |
Avastin with
Chemotherapy
(N=227) |
Chemotherapy
(N=225) |
Overall Survival |
Median (months)a |
16.8 |
12.9 |
Hazard ratio [95% CI] |
0.74 [0.58;0.94]
(p-valueb = 0.0132) |
a Kaplan-Meier estimates.
b log-rank test (stratified). |
The ORR was higher in patients who received Avastin with chemotherapy [45% (95% CI: 39, 52)]
compared to patients who received chemotherapy alone [34% (95% CI: 28,40)].
Table 12: Efficacy Results in Study GOG-0240
Efficacy Parameter |
Topotecan and
Paclitaxel with or
without Avastin
(N=223) |
Cisplatin and Paclitaxel
with or without Avastin
(N=229) |
Overall Survival |
Median (months)a |
13.3 |
15.5 |
Hazard ratio [95% CI] |
1.15 [0.91, 1.46]
p-value=0.23 |
a Kaplan-Meier estimates. |
The HR for OS with Avastin with cisplatin and paclitaxel as compared to cisplatin and paclitaxel
alone was 0.72 (95% CI: 0.51,1.02). The HR for OS with Avastin with topotecan and paclitaxel as
compared to topotecan and paclitaxel alone was 0.76 (95% CI: 0.55, 1.06).
Platinum-Resistant RecurrentEpithelial Ovarian, Fallopian Tube, Or Primary Peritoneal
Cancer
Study MO22224
Avastin was evaluated in a multicenter, open-label, randomized study [MO22224 (NCT00976911)]
comparing Avastin with chemotherapy versus chemotherapy alone in patients with
platinum-resistant, recurrent epithelial ovarian, fallopian tube, or primary peritoneal cancer that
recurred within <6 months from the most recent platinum-based therapy (N=361). Patients had
received no more than 2 prior chemotherapy regimens. Patients received one of the following
chemotherapy regimens at the discretion of the investigator: paclitaxel (80 mg/m2 on days 1, 8, 15
and 22 every 4 weeks; pegylated liposomal doxorubicin 40 mg/m2 on day 1 every 4 weeks; or
topotecan 4 mg/m2 on days 1, 8 and 15 every 4 weeks or 1.25 mg/m2 on days 1-5 every 3 weeks).
Patients were treated until disease progression, unacceptable toxicity, or withdrawal. Forty percent
of patients on the chemotherapy alone arm received Avastin alone upon progression. The main
outcome measure was investigator-assessed PFS. Secondary outcome measures were ORR and OS.
The median age was 61 years (25 to 84 years) and 37% of patients were ≥65 years.
Seventy-nine percent had measurable disease at baseline, 87% had baseline CA-125 levels ≥2 times
ULN and 31% had ascites at baseline. Seventy-three percent had a platinum-free interval (PFI) of 3
months to 6 months and 27% had PFI of <3 months. ECOG performance status was 0 for 59%, 1 for
34% and 2 for 7% of the patients.
The addition of Avastin to chemotherapy demonstrated a statistically significant improvement in
investigator-assessed PFS, which was supported by a retrospective independent review analysis.
Results for the ITT population are presented in Table 13 and Figure 6. Results for the separate
chemotherapy cohorts are presented in Table 14.
Table 13: Efficacy Results in Study MO22224
Efficacy Parameter |
Avastin with
Chemotherapy
(N=179) |
Chemotherapy
(N=182) |
PFS per Investigator |
Median (95% CI), in months |
6.8 (5.6, 7.8) |
3.4 (2.1, 3.8) |
HR (95% CI)a |
0.38 (0.30, 0.49) |
p-value b |
<0.0001 |
Overall Survival |
Median (95% CI), in months |
16.6 (13.7, 19.0) |
13.3 (11.9, 16.4) |
HR (95% CI)a |
0.89 (0.69, 1.14) |
Overall Response Rate |
Number of Patients with
Measurable Disease at Baseline |
142 |
144 |
Rate, % (95% CI) |
28% (21%, 36%) |
13% (7%, 18%) |
Duration of Response |
Median, in months |
9.4 |
5.4 |
a per stratified Cox proportional hazards model
b per stratified log rank test |
Figure 6: Kaplan-Meier Curves for Investigator-Assessed Progression-Free Survival in
Platinum-Resistant Recurrent Epithelial Ovarian, Fallopian Tube, or Primary Peritoneal
Cancer in Study MO22224
Table 14: Efficacy Results in Study MO22224 by Chemotherapy
Efficacy
Parameter |
Paclitaxel |
Topotecan |
Pegylated Liposomal
Doxorubicin |
Avastin with
Chemotherapy
(N=60) |
Chemotherapy
(N=55) |
Avastin with
Chemotherapy
(N=57) |
Chemotherapy
(N=63) |
Avastin with
Chemotherapy
(N=62) |
Chemotherapy
(N=64) |
Progression-Free Survival (per Investigator) |
Median
(months)
(95% CI) |
9.6
(7.8, 11.5) |
3.9
(3.5, 5.5) |
6.2
(5.3, 7.6) |
2.1
(1.9, 2.3) |
5.1
(3.9, 6.3) |
3.5
(1.9, 3.9) |
Hazard
ratioa
(95% CI) |
0.47
(0.31, 0.72) |
0.24
(0.15, 0.38) |
0.47
(0.32, 0.71) |
Overall Survival |
Median
(months)
(95% CI) |
22.4
(16.7, 26.7) |
13.2
(8.2, 19.7) |
13.8
(11.0, 18.3) |
13.3
(10.4, 18.3) |
13.7
(11.0, 18.3) |
14.1
(9.9, 17.8) |
Hazard
ratio a
(95% CI) |
0.64
(0.41, 1.01) |
1.12
(0.73, 1.73) |
0.94
(0.63, 1.42) |
Overall Response Rate |
Number of
patients
with
measurable
disease at
baseline |
45 |
43 |
46 |
50 |
51 |
51 |
Rate, %
(95% CI) |
53 (39, 68) |
30 (17, 44) |
17 (6, 28) |
2 (0, 6) |
16 (6, 26) |
8 (0, 15) |
Duration of Response |
Median
(months) |
11.6 |
6.8 |
5.2 |
NE |
8.0 |
4.6 |
a per stratified Cox proportional hazards model
NE= Not Estimable |
Platinum-Sensitive RecurrentEpithelial Ovarian, Fallopian Tube, Or Primary Peritoneal
Cancer
Study AVF4095g
AVF4095g (NCT00434642) was a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study studying
Avastin with chemotherapy versus chemotherapy alone in the treatment of patients with platinumsensitive
recurrent epithelial ovarian, fallopian tube, or primary peritoneal cancer who have not
received prior chemotherapy in the recurrent setting or prior bevacizumab treatment (N=484).
Patients were randomized (1:1) to receive Avastin (15 mg/kg day 1) or placebo every 3 weeks with
carboplatin (AUC 4, day 1) and gemcitabine (1000 mg/m2 on days 1 and 8) a for 6 to 10 cycles
followed by Avastin or placebo alone until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity.
The main outcome measures were investigator-assessed PFS. Secondary outcome measures were ORR
and OS.
The median age was 61 years (28 to 87 years) and 37% of patients were ≥65 years. All patients had
measurable disease at baseline, 74% had baseline CA-125 levels >ULN (35 U/mL). The platinumfree
interval (PFI) was 6 months to 12 months in 42 % of patients and >12 months in 58% of
patients. The ECOG performance status was 0 or 1 for 99.8% of patients.
A statistically significant prolongation in PFS was demonstrated among patients receiving Avastin
with chemotherapy compared to those receiving placebo with chemotherapy (Table 15 and Figure
7). Independent radiology review of PFS was consistent with investigator assessment [HR 0.45 (95%
CI: 0.35, 0.58)]. OS was not significantly improved with the addition of Avastin to chemotherapy
[HR 0.95 (95% CI: 0.77, 1.17)].
Table 15: Efficacy Results in Study AVF4095g
Efficacy Parameter |
Avastin with Gemcitabine
and Carboplatin
(N=242) |
Placebo with Gemcitabine
and Carboplatin
(N=242) |
Progression Free Survival |
Median PFS (months) |
12.4 |
8.4 |
Hazard ratio
(95% CI) |
0.46
(0.37, 0.58) |
p-value |
< 0.0001 |
Overall Response Rate |
% patients with overall
response |
78% |
57% |
p-value |
< 0.0001 |
Figure 7: Kaplan-Meier Curves for Progression Free Survival in Platinum-Sensitive Recurrent
Epithelial Ovarian, Fallopian Tube, or Primary Peritoneal Cancer in Study AVF4095g
Study GOG-0213
Study GOG-0213 (NCT00565851) was a randomized, controlled, open-label study of Avastin with
chemotherapy versus chemotherapy alone in the treatment of patients with platinum-sensitive
recurrent epithelial ovarian, fallopian tube, or primary peritoneal cancer, who have not received
more than one previous regimen of chemotherapy (N=673). Patients were randomized (1:1) to
receive carboplatin (AUC 5) and paclitaxel (175 mg/m2 IV over 3 hours) every 3 weeks for 6 to 8
cycles (N=336) or Avastin (15 mg/kg) every 3 weeks with carboplatin (AUC 5) and paclitaxel (175
mg/m2 IV over 3 hours) for 6 to 8 cycles followed by Avastin (15 mg/kg every 3 weeks) as a single
agent until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. The main outcome measure was OS. Other
outcome measures were investigator-assessed PFS, and ORR.
The median age was 60 years (23 to 85 years) and 33% of patients were ≥ 65 years. Eightythree
percent had measurable disease at baseline and 74% had abnormal CA-125 levels at baseline.
Ten percent of patients had received prior bevacizumab. Twenty-six percent had a PFI of 6 months
to 12 months and 74% had a PFI of >12 months. GOG performance status was 0 or 1 for 99% of
patients.
Results are presented in Table 16 and Figure 8.
Table 16: Efficacy Results in Study GOG-0213
Efficacy Parameter |
Avastin with
Carboplatin and Paclitaxel
(N=337) |
Carboplatin and Paclitaxel
(N=336) |
Overall Survival |
Median OS (months) |
42.6 |
37.3 |
Hazard ratio (95% CI) (IVRS)a |
0.84 (0.69, 1.01) |
Hazard ratio (95% CI) (eCRF)b |
0.82 (0.68, 0.996) |
Progression-free Survival |
Median PFS (months) |
13.8 |
10.4 |
Hazard ratio (95% CI) (IVRS)a |
0.61 (0.51, 0.72) |
Overall Response Rate |
Number of patients with
measurable disease at baseline |
274 |
286 |
Rate, % |
213 (78%) |
159 (56%) |
a HR was estimated from Cox proportional hazards models stratified by the duration of treatment free-interval prior to enrolling onto
this study per IVRS (interactive voice response system) and secondary surgical debulking status.
b HR was estimated from Cox proportional hazards models stratified by the duration of platinum free-interval prior to enrolling onto
this study per eCRF (electronic case report form) and secondary surgical debulking status. |
Figure 8: Kaplan Meier Curves for Overall Survival in Platinum-Sensitive Recurrent
Epithelial Ovarian, Fallopian Tube, or Primary Peritoneal Cancer in Study GOG-0213
Stage III Or IV Epithelial Ovarian, Fallopian Tube, Or Primary Peritoneal Cancer
Following Initial Surgical Resection
Study GOG-0218
Study GOG-0218 (NCT00262847) was a multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo controlled,
three arm study evaluating the effect of adding Avastin to carboplatin and paclitaxel for the
treatment of patients with stage III or IV epithelial ovarian, fallopian tube or primary peritoneal
cancer (N=1873) following initial surgical resection. Patients were randomized (1:1:1) to one of the
following arms:
- CPP: carboplatin (AUC 6) and paclitaxel (175 mg/m2) for six cycles, with concurrent placebo
started at cycle 2, followed by placebo alone every three weeks for a total of up to 22 cycles of
therapy (n=625) or
- CPB15: carboplatin (AUC 6) and paclitaxel (175 mg/m2) for six cycles, with concurrent Avastin
started at cycle 2, followed by placebo alone every three weeks for a total of up to 22 cycles of
therapy (n=625) or
- CPB15+: carboplatin (AUC 6) and paclitaxel (175 mg/m2) for six cycles, with concurrent Avastin
started at cycle 2, followed by Avastin as a single agent every three weeks for a total of up to 22
cycles of therapy (n=623).
The main efficacy outcome measure was investigator-assessed progression-free survival (PFS).
Overall survival (OS) was a secondary outcome measure.
The median age was 60 years (range 22-89 years) and 28% of patients were >65 years of age.
Overall, approximately 50% of patients had a GOG PS of 0 at baseline, and 43% a GOG PS score of
1. Patients had either epithelial ovarian cancer (83%), primary peritoneal cancer (15%), or fallopian
tube cancer (2%). Serous adenocarcinoma was the most common histologic type (85% in CPP and
CPB15 arms, 86% in CPB15+ arm). Overall, approximately 34% of patients had resected FIGO
Stage III with residual disease < 1cm, 40% had resected Stage III with residual disease >1 cm, and
26% had resected Stage IV disease.
The majority of patients in all three treatment arms received subsequent antineoplastic treatment,
78.1% in the CPP arm, 78.6% in the CPB15 arm, and 73.2% in the CPB15+ arm. A higher
proportion of patients in the CPP arm (25.3%) and CPB15 arm (26.6%) received at least one antiangiogenic
(including bevacizumab) treatment after discontinuing from study compared with the
CPB15+ arm (15.6%).
Study results are presented in Table 17 and Figure 9.
Table 17: Efficacy Results in Study GOG-0218
Efficacy Paramenter |
Avastin with
carboplatin and
paclitaxel followed by
Avastin alone
(N=623) |
Avastin with
carboplatin and
paclitaxel
(N= 625) |
Carboplatin and
paclitaxel
(N= 625) |
Progression-free survival per
Investigator |
Median PFS (months) |
18.2 |
12.8 |
12.0 |
Hazard ratio (95% CI)1 |
0.62
(0.52, 0.75) |
0.83
(0.70, 0.98) |
|
p –value2 |
< 0.0001 |
NS |
|
Overall survival3 |
Median OS (months) |
43.8 |
38.8 |
40.6 |
Hazard ratio (95% CI)1 |
0.89
(0.76, 1.05) |
1.06
(0.90, 1.24) |
|
NS = not significant
1Relative to the control arm; stratified hazard ratio
2 Two-sided p-value based on re-randomization test
3 Final overall survival analysis |
Figure 9:
Kaplan-Meier Curves for Investigator-Assessed Progression-Free Survival in Stage III or IV
Epithelial Ovarian, Fallopian Tube, or Primary Peritoneal Cancer Following Initial Surgical
Resection in Study GOG-0218