WARNINGS
Included as part of the PRECAUTIONS section.
PRECAUTIONS
Lactic Acidosis
Incidence and Management
Lactic acidosis is a rare, but serious, metabolic complication
that can occur due to metformin accumulation during treatment with AVANDAMET;
when it occurs, it is fatal in approximately 50% of cases. Lactic acidosis may also
occur in association with a number of pathophysiologic conditions, including
diabetes mellitus, and whenever there is significant tissue hypoperfusion and
hypoxemia. Lactic acidosis is characterized by elevated blood lactate levels
(>5 mmol/L), decreased blood pH, electrolyte disturbances with an increased
anion gap, and an increased lactate/pyruvate ratio. When metformin is
implicated as the cause of lactic acidosis, metformin plasma levels >5
mcg/mL are generally found.
The reported incidence of lactic acidosis in patients
receiving metformin is very low (approximately 0.03 cases/1,000 patient-years
of exposure, with approximately 0.015 fatal cases/1,000 patient-years of
exposure). Reported cases have occurred primarily in diabetic patients with
significant renal insufficiency, including both intrinsic renal disease and
renal hypoperfusion, often in the setting of multiple concomitant
medical/surgical problems and multiple concomitant medications. Patients with
congestive heart failure requiring pharmacologic management, in particular
those with unstable or acute congestive heart failure who are at risk of
hypoperfusion and hypoxemia, are at increased risk of lactic acidosis. The risk
of lactic acidosis increases with the degree of renal dysfunction and the
patient's age. The risk of lactic acidosis may, therefore, be significantly
decreased by regular monitoring of renal function in patients taking AVANDAMET
and by use of the minimum effective dose of AVANDAMET. In particular, treatment
of the elderly should be accompanied by careful monitoring of renal function.
Treatment with AVANDAMET should not be initiated in patients ≥80 years of
age unless measurement of creatinine clearance demonstrates that renal function
is not reduced, as these patients are more susceptible to developing lactic
acidosis. In addition, AVANDAMET should be promptly withheld in the presence of
any condition associated with hypoxemia, dehydration, or sepsis. Because
impaired hepatic function may significantly limit the ability to clear lactate,
AVANDAMET should generally be avoided in patients with clinical or laboratory evidence
of hepatic disease. Patients should be cautioned against excessive alcohol
intake, either acute or chronic, when taking AVANDAMET, since alcohol
potentiates the effects of metformin on lactate metabolism. In addition,
AVANDAMET should be temporarily discontinued prior to any intravascular
radiocontrast study and for any surgical procedure.
The onset of lactic acidosis often is subtle, and
accompanied only by nonspecific symptoms such as malaise, myalgias, respiratory
distress, increasing somnolence, and nonspecific abdominal distress. There may
be associated hypothermia, hypotension, and resistant bradyarrhythmias with
more marked acidosis. The patient and the patient's physician must be aware of
the possible importance of such symptoms and the patient should be instructed
to notify the physician immediately if they occur. AVANDAMET should be
withdrawn until the situation is clarified. Serum electrolytes, ketones, blood
glucose, and, if indicated, blood pH, lactate levels, and even blood metformin
levels may be useful. Once a patient is stabilized on any dose level of
AVANDAMET, gastrointestinal symptoms, which are common during initiation of therapy,
are unlikely to be drug related. Later occurrence of gastrointestinal symptoms
could be due to lactic acidosis or other serious disease. Levels of fasting
venous plasma lactate above the upper limit of normal but less than 5 mmol/L in
patients taking AVANDAMET do not necessarily indicate impending lactic acidosis
and may be explainable by other mechanisms, such as poorly controlled diabetes
or obesity, vigorous physical activity, or technical problems in sample
handling.
Lactic acidosis should be suspected in any diabetic
patient with metabolic acidosis lacking evidence of ketoacidosis (ketonuria and
ketonemia).
Lactic acidosis is a medical emergency that must be
treated in a hospital setting. In a patient with lactic acidosis who is taking
AVANDAMET, the drug should be discontinued immediately and general supportive
measures promptly instituted. Because metformin is dialyzable (with a clearance
of up to 170 mL/min under good hemodynamic conditions), prompt hemodialysis is
recommended to correct the acidosis and remove the accumulated metformin. Such
management often results in prompt reversal of symptoms and recovery [see CONTRAINDICATIONS].
Factors That May Predispose Patients to Lactic Acidosis
Assessment of Renal Function: Metformin is known
to be substantially excreted by the kidney, and the risk of metformin
accumulation and lactic acidosis increases with the degree of impairment of
renal function. Thus, patients with serum creatinine levels above the upper
limit of normal for their age should not receive AVANDAMET. In patients with
advanced age, AVANDAMET should be carefully titrated to establish the minimum
dose for adequate glycemic effect, because aging is associated with reduced
renal function. [See DOSAGE AND ADMINISTRATION, Use in Specific
Populations]
Before initiation of therapy with AVANDAMET and at least
annually thereafter, renal function should be assessed and verified as normal.
In patients in whom development of renal dysfunction is anticipated, renal
function should be assessed more frequently and AVANDAMET discontinued if
evidence of renal impairment is present.
Medications That Affect Renal Function: Concomitant
medication(s) that may affect renal function or result in significant
hemodynamic change or may interfere with the disposition of metformin, such as
cationic drugs that are eliminated by renal tubular secretion [see DRUG
INTERACTIONS, CLINICAL PHARMACOLOGY], should be used with caution.
Hypoxic States: Cardiovascular collapse (shock)
from whatever cause, acute congestive heart failure, acute myocardial
infarction, and other conditions characterized by hypoxemia have been
associated with lactic acidosis and may also cause prerenal azotemia. When such
events occur in patients receiving AVANDAMET, the drug should be promptly
discontinued.
Radiologic Studies With Intravascular Iodinated
Contrast Materials: Intravascular contrast studies with iodinated materials
can lead to acute alteration of renal function and have been associated with
lactic acidosis in patients receiving metformin [see CONTRAINDICATIONS].
Therefore, in patients in whom any such study is planned, AVANDAMET should be temporarily
discontinued at the time of or prior to the procedure, and withheld for 48
hours subsequent to the procedure and reinstituted only after renal function
has been re-evaluated and found to be normal.
Surgical Procedures: Use of AVANDAMET should be
temporarily suspended for any surgical procedure (except minor procedures not
associated with restricted intake of food and fluids) and should not be
restarted until the patient's oral intake has resumed and renal function has
been evaluated as normal.
Alcohol Intake: Alcohol potentiates the effect of
metformin on lactate metabolism. Patients, therefore, should be warned against
excessive alcohol intake, acute or chronic, while receiving AVANDAMET.
Change in Clinical Status of Patients With Previously
Controlled Diabetes: A patient with type 2 diabetes previously
well-controlled on AVANDAMET who develops laboratory abnormalities or clinical
illness (especially vague and poorly defined illness) should be evaluated
promptly for evidence of ketoacidosis or lactic acidosis. Evaluation should
include serum electrolytes and ketones, blood glucose, and, if indicated, blood
pH, lactate, pyruvate, and metformin levels. If acidosis of either form occurs,
AVANDAMET must be stopped immediately and other appropriate corrective measures
initiated.
Cardiac Failure
Rosiglitazone, like other thiazolidinediones, alone or in
combination with other antidiabetic agents, can cause fluid retention, which
may exacerbate or lead to heart failure. Patients should be observed for signs
and symptoms of heart failure. If these signs and symptoms develop, the heart
failure should be managed according to current standards of care. Furthermore,
discontinuation or dose reduction of rosiglitazone must be considered [see BOXED
WARNING].
Patients with congestive heart failure (CHF) NYHA Class I
and II treated with rosiglitazone have an increased risk of cardiovascular
events. A 52-week, double-blind, placebocontrolled, echocardiographic trial was
conducted in 224 patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus and NYHA Class I or II
CHF (ejection fraction < 45%) on background antidiabetic and CHF therapy. An
independent committee conducted a blinded evaluation of fluid-related events (including
congestive heart failure) and cardiovascular hospitalizations according to
predefined criteria (adjudication). Separate from the adjudication, other
cardiovascular adverse events were reported by investigators. Although no
treatment difference in change from baseline of ejection fractions was
observed, more cardiovascular adverse events were observed with rosiglitazone treatment
compared with placebo during the 52-week trial. (See Table 2.)
Table 2: Emergent Cardiovascular Adverse Events in
Patients With Congestive Heart Failure (NYHA Class I and II) Treated With
Rosiglitazone or Placebo (in Addition to Background Antidiabetic and CHF
Therapy)
Events |
Rosiglitazone
N = 110
n (%) |
Placebo
N = 114
n (%) |
Adjudicated |
Cardiovascular deaths |
5(5%) |
4(4%) |
CHF worsening |
7(6%) |
4(4%) |
with overnight hospitalization |
5 (5%) |
4 (4%) |
without overnight hospitalization |
2 (2%) |
0 (0%) |
New or worsening edema |
28(25%) |
10(9%) |
New or worsening dyspnea |
29(26%) |
19(17%) |
Increases in CHF medication |
36(33%) |
20(18%) |
Cardiovascular hospitalizationa |
21(19%) |
15(13%) |
Investigator-reported, non-adj udicated |
Ischemic adverse events |
10(9%) |
5(4%) |
Myocardial infarction |
5 (5%) |
2 (2%) |
Angina |
6 (5%) |
3 (3%) |
a Includes hospitalization for any
cardiovascular reason. |
In a long-term, cardiovascular outcome trial (RECORD) in
patients with type 2 diabetes [see ADVERSE REACTIONS], the incidence of
heart failure was higher in patients treated with rosiglitazone [2.7%
(61/2,220) compared with active control 1.3% (29/2,227), HR 2.10 (95% CI: 1.35,
3.27)].
Initiation of AVANDAMET in patients with established NYHA
Class III or IV heart failure is contraindicated. AVANDAMET is not recommended
in patients with symptomatic heart failure. [See BOXED WARNING.]
Patients experiencing acute coronary syndromes have not
been studied in controlled clinical trials. In view of the potential for
development of heart failure in patients having an acute coronary event,
initiation of AVANDAMET is not recommended for patients experiencing an acute
coronary event, and discontinuation of AVANDAMET during this acute phase should
be considered.
Patients with NYHA Class III and IV cardiac status (with
or without CHF) have not been studied in controlled clinical trials. AVANDAMET
is not recommended in patients with NYHA Class III and IV cardiac status.
Congestive Heart Failure During Coadministration of
Rosiglitazone With Insulin
In trials in which rosiglitazone was added to insulin,
rosiglitazone increased the risk of congestive heart failure. Coadministration
of rosiglitazone and insulin is not recommended. [See INDICATIONS AND USAGE,
Major Adverse Cardiovascular Events]
In 7 controlled, randomized, double-blind trials which
had durations from 16 to 26 weeks and which were included in a meta-analysis [see
Major Adverse Cardiovascular Events], patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus were
randomized to coadministration of rosiglitazone and insulin (N = 1,018) or
insulin (N = 815). In these 7 trials, rosiglitazone was added to insulin. These
trials included patients with long-standing diabetes (median duration of 12
years) and a high prevalence of pre-existing medical conditions, including
peripheral neuropathy, retinopathy, ischemic heart disease, vascular disease,
and congestive heart failure. The total number of patients with emergent
congestive heart failure was 23 (2.3%) and 8 (1.0%) in the rosiglitazone plus
insulin and insulin groups, respectively.
Heart Failure in Observational Studies of Elderly
Diabetic Patients Comparing Rosiglitazone to Pioglitazone
Three observational studies in elderly diabetic patients
(age 65 years and older) found that rosiglitazone statistically significantly
increased the risk of hospitalized heart failure compared to use of
pioglitazone. One other observational study in patients with a mean age of 54
years, which also included an analysis in a subpopulation of patients >65
years of age, found no statistically significant increase in emergency
department visits or hospitalization for heart failure in patients treated with
rosiglitazone compared to pioglitazone in the older subgroup.
Major Adverse Cardiovascular Events
Data from long-term, prospective, randomized, controlled
clinical trials of rosiglitazone versus metformin or sulfonylureas,
particularly a cardiovascular outcome trial (RECORD), observed no difference in
overall mortality or in major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) and its
components. A meta-analysis of mostly short-term trials suggested an increased
risk for myocardial infarction with rosiglitazone compared with placebo.
Cardiovascular Events in Large, Long-term, Prospective,
Randomized, Controlled Trials of Rosiglitazone
RECORD, a prospectively designed cardiovascular outcome
trial (mean follow-up 5.5 years; 4,447 patients), compared the addition of
rosiglitazone to metformin or a sulfonylurea (N = 2,220) with a control group
of metformin plus sulfonylurea (N = 2,227) in patients with type 2 diabetes [see
ADVERSE REACTIONS]. Non-inferiority was demonstrated for the primary
endpoint, cardiovascular hospitalization or cardiovascular death, for
rosiglitazone compared with control [HR 0.99 (95% CI: 0.85, 1.16)]
demonstrating no overall increased risk in cardiovascular morbidity or
mortality. The hazard ratios for total mortality and MACE were consistent with
the primary endpoint and the 95% CI similarly excluded a 20% increase in risk
for rosiglitazone. The hazard ratios for the components of MACE were 0.72 (95%
CI: 0.49, 1.06) for stroke, 1.14 (95% CI: 0.80, 1.63) for myocardial
infarction, and 0.84 (95% CI: 0.59, 1.18) for cardiovascular death.
The results of RECORD are consistent with the findings of
2 earlier long-term, prospective, randomized, controlled clinical trials (each
trial >3 years' duration; total of 9,620 patients) (see Figure 1). In
patients with impaired glucose tolerance (DREAM trial), although the incidence
of cardiovascular events was higher among subjects who were randomized to rosiglitazone
in combination with ramipril than among subjects randomized to ramipril alone,
no statistically significant differences were observed for MACE and its
components between rosiglitazone and placebo. In type 2 diabetes patients who
were initiating oral agent monotherapy (ADOPT trial), no statistically
significant differences were observed for MACE and its components between
rosiglitazone and metformin or a sulfonylurea.
Figure 1: Hazard Ratios for the Risk of MACE,
Myocardial Infarction, and Total Mortality With Rosiglitazone Compared With a
Control Group in Long-term Trials
Cardiovascular Events in a Group of 52 Clinical Trials
In a meta-analysis of 52 double-blind, randomized,
controlled clinical trials designed to assess glucose-lowering efficacy in type
2 diabetes (mean duration 6 months), a statistically significant increased risk
of myocardial infarction with rosiglitazone versus pooled comparators was
observed [0.4% versus 0.3%; OR 1.8, (95% CI: 1.03, 3.25)]. A statistically
non-significant increased risk of MACE was observed with rosiglitazone versus
pooled comparators (OR 1.44, 95% CI: 0.95, 2.20). In the placebo-controlled
trials, a statistically significant increased risk of myocardial infarction
[0.4% versus 0.2%, OR 2.23 (95% CI: 1.14, 4.64)] and statistically
non-significant increased risk of MACE [0.7% versus 0.5%, OR 1.53 (95% CI:
0.94, 2.54)] with rosiglitazone were
observed. In the active-controlled trials, there was no
increased risk of myocardial infarction or MACE.
Mortality in Observational Studies of Rosiglitazone
Compared to Pioglitazone
Three observational studies in elderly diabetic patients
(age 65 years and older) found that rosiglitazone statistically significantly
increased the risk of all-cause mortality compared to use of pioglitazone. One
observational study in patients with a mean age of 54 years found no difference
in all-cause mortality between patients treated with rosiglitazone compared to pioglitazone
and reported similar results in the subpopulation of patients >65 years of
age. One additional small, prospective, observational study found no
statistically significant differences for CV mortality and all-cause mortality
in patients treated with rosiglitazone compared to pioglitazone.
Edema
AVANDAMET should be used with caution in patients with
edema. In a clinical trial in healthy volunteers who received rosiglitazone 8
mg once daily for 8 weeks, there was a statistically significant increase in
median plasma volume compared with placebo. Since thiazolidinediones, including
rosiglitazone, can cause fluid retention, which can exacerbate or lead to
congestive heart failure, AVANDAMET should be used with caution in patients at
risk for heart failure. Patients should be monitored for signs and symptoms of
heart failure [see BOXED WARNING, Cardiac Failure, PATIENT INFORMATION].
In controlled clinical trials of patients with type 2
diabetes, mild to moderate edema was reported in patients treated with
rosiglitazone, and may be dose-related. Patients with ongoing edema were more
likely to have adverse events associated with edema if started on combination therapy
with insulin and rosiglitazone [see ADVERSE REACTIONS]. The use of
AVANDAMET in combination with insulin is not recommended. [See Cardiac Failure.]
Weight Gain
Dose-related weight gain was seen with rosiglitazone
alone and rosiglitazone together with other hypoglycemic agents (see Table 3).
No overall change in median weight was observed with AVANDAMET in drug-naive
patients. The mechanism of weight gain with rosiglitazone is unclear but
probably involves a combination of fluid retention and fat accumulation.
Table 3: Weight Changes (kg) From Baseline at Endpoint
During Clinical Trials [Median (25th, 75th Percentiles)]
Monotherapy |
Duration |
Control Group |
Rosiglitazone 4 mg |
Rosiglitazone 8 mg |
26 weeks |
Placebo |
-0.9 (-2.8, 0.9) N = 210 |
1.0 (0.9, 3.6) N = 436 |
3.1 (1.1, 5.8) N = 439 |
52 weeks |
Sulfonylurea |
2.0 (0, 4.0) N = 173 |
2.0 (-0.6, 4.0) N = 150 |
2.6 (0, 5.3) N = 157 |
Combination Therapy |
Duration |
Control Group |
Rosiglitazone + |
Control Therapy |
Rosiglitazone 4 mg |
Rosiglitazone 8 mg |
24-26 weeks |
Sulfonylurea |
0 (-1.0, 1.3) N = 1,155 |
2.2 (0.5, 4.0) N = 613 |
3.5 (1.4, 5.9) N = 841 |
26 weeks |
Metformin |
-1.4 (-3.2, 0.2) N = 175 |
0.8 (-1.0, 2.6) N = 100 |
2.1 (0, 4.3) N = 184 |
26 weeks |
Insulin |
0.9 (-0.5, 2.7) N = 162 |
4.1 (1.4, 6.3) N = 164 |
5.4 (3.4, 7.3) N = 150 |
AVANDAMET in Patients With Inadequate Control on Diet and Exercise |
Duration |
Control Group |
AVANDAMET |
32 weeks |
Metformin |
-2.2 (-5.5, -0.5) N = 123 |
0.05 kg
(-3.45, 3.0) N = 136 |
Rosiglitazone |
1.7 (-1.2, 4.5) N = 136 |
AVANDAMET + Insulin |
Duration |
Control Group |
AVANDAMET + Insulin |
24 weeks |
Insulin |
2.6 kg (0.3, 4.8) N = 145 |
3.3 kg (1.5, 6.0) N = 147 |
In a 4- to 6-year, monotherapy, comparative trial (ADOPT)
in patients recently diagnosed with type 2 diabetes not previously treated with
antidiabetic medication, the median weight change (25*, 75* percentiles) from
baseline at 4 years was 3.5 kg (0.0, 8.1) for rosiglitazone, 2.0 kg (-1.0, 4.8)
for glyburide, and -2.4 kg (-5.4, 0.5) for metformin.
In postmarketing experience with rosiglitazone alone or
in combination with other hypoglycemic agents, there have been rare reports of
unusually rapid increases in weight and increases in excess of that generally
observed in clinical trials. Patients who experience such increases should be
assessed for fluid accumulation and volume-related events such as excessive edema
and congestive heart failure [see BOXED WARNING].
Hepatic Effects
Metformin
Since impaired hepatic function has been associated with
some cases of lactic acidosis, AVANDAMET should generally be avoided in
patients with clinical or laboratory evidence of hepatic disease.
Rosiglitazone
Liver enzymes should be measured prior to the initiation
of therapy with AVANDAMET in all patients and periodically thereafter per the
clinical judgment of the healthcare professional. Therapy with AVANDAMET should
not be initiated in patients with increased baseline liver enzyme levels (ALT
>2.5X upper limit of normal). Patients with mildly elevated liver enzymes
(ALT levels ≤ 2.5X upper limit of normal) at baseline or during therapy with
AVANDAMET should be evaluated to determine the cause of the liver enzyme
elevation. Initiation of, or continuation of, therapy with AVANDAMET in
patients with mild liver enzyme elevations should proceed with caution and
include close clinical follow-up, including more frequent liver enzyme
monitoring, to determine if the liver enzyme elevations resolve or worsen. If
at any time ALT levels increase to >3X the upper limit of normal in patients
on therapy with AVANDAMET, liver enzyme levels should be rechecked as soon as
possible. If ALT levels remain >3X the upper limit of normal, therapy with
AVANDAMET should be discontinued.
 If any patient develops symptoms suggesting hepatic
dysfunction, which may include unexplained nausea, vomiting, abdominal pain,
fatigue, anorexia, and/or dark urine, liver enzymes should be checked. The
decision whether to continue the patient on therapy with AVANDAMET should be
guided by clinical judgment pending laboratory evaluations. If jaundice is
observed, drug therapy should be discontinued.
In addition, if the presence of hepatic disease or
hepatic dysfunction of sufficient magnitude to predispose to lactic acidosis is
confirmed, therapy with AVANDAMET should be discontinued.
Macular Edema
Macular edema has been reported in postmarketing
experience in some diabetic patients who were taking rosiglitazone or another
thiazolidinedione. Some patients presented with blurred vision or decreased
visual acuity, but some patients appear to have been diagnosed on routine ophthalmologic
examination. Most patients had peripheral edema at the time macular edema was diagnosed.
Some patients had improvement in their macular edema after discontinuation of
their thiazolidinedione. Patients with diabetes should have regular eye exams
by an ophthalmologist, per the Standards of Care of the American Diabetes
Association. Additionally, any diabetic who reports any kind of visual symptom
should be promptly referred to an ophthalmologist,
regardless of the patient's underlying medications or
other physical findings. [See ADVERSE REACTIONS]
Fractures
Long-term trials (ADOPT and RECORD) show an increased
incidence of bone fracture in patients, particularly female patients, taking
rosiglitazone [see ADVERSE REACTIONS]. This increased incidence was
noted after the first year of treatment and persisted during the course of the
trial. The majority of the fractures in the women who received rosiglitazone
occurred in the upper arm, hand, and foot. These sites of fracture are
different from those usually associated with postmenopausal osteoporosis (e.g.,
hip or spine). Other trials suggest that this risk may also apply to men,
although the risk of fracture among women appears higher than that among men. The
risk of fracture should be considered in the care of patients treated with
rosiglitazone, and attention given to assessing and maintaining bone health
according to current standards of care.
Hematologic Effects
Decreases in mean hemoglobin and hematocrit occurred in a
dose-related fashion in adult patients treated with rosiglitazone [see ADVERSE
REACTIONS]. The observed changes may be related to the increased plasma
volume observed with treatment with rosiglitazone and may be dose-related. The
decrease in hemoglobin was seen more frequently in combination rosiglitazone and
metformin therapy than in rosiglitazone therapy alone. Vitamin B12 deficiency
may contribute to the observed reductions in hemoglobin. Initial and periodic monitoring of hematologic parameters
(e.g., hemoglobin/hematocrit and red blood cell indices) should be performed,
at least on an annual basis.
Vitamin B12 Levels
In controlled clinical trials of metformin of 29 weeks'
duration, a decrease to subnormal levels of previously normal serum vitamin B12
levels, without clinical manifestations, was observed in approximately 7% of
patients. Such decrease, possibly due to interference with B12 absorption from
the B12-intrinsic factor complex, is, however, very rarely associated with
anemia and appears to be rapidly reversible with discontinuation of metformin
or vitamin B12 supplementation. Certain individuals (those with inadequate
vitamin B12 or calcium intake or absorption) appear to be predisposed to
developing subnormal vitamin B12 levels. In these patients, routine serum
vitamin B12 measurements at 2- to 3-year intervals may be useful. Vitamin B12
deficiency should be excluded if megaloblastic anemia is suspected. [See Hematologic Effects]
Diabetes And Blood Glucose Control
Periodic fasting blood glucose and HbA1c measurements
should be performed to monitor therapeutic response.
When a patient stabilized on any diabetic regimen is
exposed to stress such as fever, trauma, infection, or surgery, a temporary
loss of glycemic control may occur. At such times, it may be necessary to
withhold AVANDAMET and temporarily administer insulin. AVANDAMET may be
reinstituted after the acute episode is resolved.
Hypoglycemia does not occur in patients receiving
metformin alone under usual circumstances of use but could occur when caloric
intake is deficient, when strenuous exercise is not compensated by caloric
supplementation, or during concomitant use with hypoglycemic agents (such as
sulfonylureas or insulin) or ethanol. Elderly, debilitated or malnourished
patients, and those with adrenal or pituitary insufficiency or alcohol
intoxication are particularly susceptible to hypoglycemic effects. Hypoglycemia
may be difficult to recognize in the elderly and in people who are taking
P-adrenergic blocking drugs.
Patients receiving rosiglitazone in combination with
other hypoglycemic agents may be at risk for hypoglycemia, and a reduction in
the dose of the concomitant agent may be necessary.
Ovulation
Therapy with rosiglitazone, like other thiazolidinediones,
may result in ovulation in some premenopausal anovulatory women. As a result,
these patients may be at an increased risk for pregnancy while taking AVANDAMET
[see Use In Specific Populations]. Thus, adequate contraception in
premenopausal women should be recommended. This possible effect has not been
specifically investigated in clinical trials; therefore, the frequency of this
occurrence is not known.
Although hormonal imbalance has been seen in preclinical
studies [see Nonclinical Toxicology], the clinical significance of this
finding is not known. If unexpected menstrual dysfunction occurs, the benefits
of continued therapy with AVANDAMET should be reviewed.
Patient Counseling Information
Advise the patient to read the FDA-approved patient
labeling (Medication Guide).
There are multiple medications available to treat type 2
diabetes. The benefits and risks of each available diabetes medication should
be taken into account when choosing a particular diabetes medication for a
given patient.
Patients should be informed of the following:
- The risks of lactic acidosis, its symptoms, and
conditions that predispose to its development, as noted in the WARNINGS and
PRECAUTIONS sections, should be explained to patients. Patients should be
advised to discontinue AVANDAMET immediately and to promptly notify their
health practitioner if unexplained hyperventilation, myalgia, malaise, unusual somnolence,
or other nonspecific symptoms occur. Once a patient is stabilized on any dose level
of AVANDAMET, gastrointestinal symptoms, which are common during initiation of metformin
therapy, are unlikely to be drug related. Later occurrence of gastrointestinal symptoms
could be due to lactic acidosis or other serious disease.
- Avoid excessive alcohol intake, either acute or chronic,
while receiving AVANDAMET.
- AVANDAMET is not recommended for patients with
symptomatic heart failure.
- A meta-analysis of mostly short-term trials suggested an
increased risk for myocardial infarction with rosiglitazone compared with
placebo. Data from long-term clinical trials of rosiglitazone versus other
antidiabetes agents (metformin or sulfonylureas), including a cardiovascular
outcome trial (RECORD), observed no difference in overall mortality or in major
adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) and its components.
- AVANDAMET is not recommended for patients who are taking
insulin.
- Management of type 2 diabetes should include diet
control. Caloric restriction, weight loss, and exercise are essential for the
proper treatment of the diabetic patient because they help improve insulin
sensitivity. This is important not only in the primary treatment of type 2 diabetes
but also in maintaining the efficacy of drug therapy.
- It is important to adhere to dietary instructions and to
regularly have blood glucose, glycosylated hemoglobin (HbA1c), renal function,
and hematologic parameters tested. It can take 2 weeks to see a reduction in
blood glucose and 2 to 3 months to see the full effect of AVANDAMET.
- Blood will be drawn to check their liver function prior
to the start of therapy and periodically thereafter per the clinical judgment
of the healthcare professional. Patients with unexplained symptoms of nausea,
vomiting, abdominal pain, fatigue, anorexia, or dark urine should immediately
report these symptoms to their physician.
- Patients who experience an unusually rapid increase in
weight or edema or who develop shortness of breath or other symptoms of heart
failure while on AVANDAMET should immediately report these symptoms to their
physician.
- Therapy with AVANDAMET, like other thiazolidinediones,
may result in ovulation in some premenopausal anovulatory women. As a result,
these patients may be at an increased risk for pregnancy while taking
AVANDAMET. Thus, adequate contraception in premenopausal women should be
recommended. This possible effect has not been specifically investigated in
clinical trials so the frequency of this occurrence is not known.
Nonclinical Toxicology
Carcinogenesis, Mutagenesis, Impairment Of Fertility
No animal studies have been conducted with AVANDAMET. The
following data are based on findings in studies performed with rosiglitazone or
metformin individually.
Rosiglitazone
A 2-year carcinogenicity study was conducted in Charles
River CD-1 mice at doses of 0.4, 1.5, and 6 mg/kg/day in the diet (highest dose
equivalent to approximately 12 times human AUC at the maximum recommended human
daily dose of the rosiglitazone component of AVANDAMET). Sprague-Dawley rats
were dosed for 2 years by oral gavage at doses of 0.05, 0.3, and 2 mg/kg/day
(highest dose equivalent to approximately 10 and 20 times human AUC at the
maximum recommended human daily dose of the rosiglitazone component of AVANDAMET
for male and female rats, respectively).
Rosiglitazone was not carcinogenic in the mouse. There
was an increase in incidence of adipose hyperplasia in the mouse at doses
≥1.5 mg/kg/day (approximately 2 times human AUC at the maximum recommended
human daily dose of the rosiglitazone component of AVANDAMET). In rats, there
was a significant increase in the incidence of benign adipose tissue tumors
(lipomas) at doses ≥0.3 mg/kg/day (approximately 2 times human AUC at the maximum
recommended human daily dose of the rosiglitazone component of AVANDAMET). These
proliferative changes in both species are considered due to the persistent
pharmacological overstimulation of adipose tissue.
Rosiglitazone was not mutagenic or clastogenic in the in
vitro bacterial assays for gene mutation, the in vitro chromosome aberration
test in human lymphocytes, the in vivo mouse micronucleus test, and the in
vivo/in vitro rat UDS assay. There was a small (about 2-fold) increase in
mutation in the in vitro mouse lymphoma assay in the presence of metabolic activation.
Rosiglitazone had no effects on mating or fertility of
male rats given up to 40 mg/kg/day (approximately 116 times human AUC at the
maximum recommended human daily dose of the rosiglitazone component of
AVANDAMET). Rosiglitazone altered estrous cyclicity (2 mg/kg/day) and reduced
fertility (40 mg/kg/day) of female rats in association with lower plasma levels
of progesterone and estradiol (approximately 20 and 200 times human AUC at the maximum
recommended human daily dose of the rosiglitazone component of AVANDAMET, respectively).
No such effects were noted at 0.2 mg/kg/day (approximately 3 times human AUC at
the maximum recommended human daily dose of the rosiglitazone component of AVANDAMET).
In juvenile rats dosed from 27 days of age through to sexual maturity (at up to
40 mg/kg/day), there was no effect on male reproductive performance, or on
estrous cyclicity, mating performance or pregnancy incidence in females
(approximately 68 times human AUC at the maximum recommended daily dose of
rosiglitazone). In monkeys, rosiglitazone (0.6 and 4.6 mg/kg/day; approximately
3 and 15 times human AUC at the maximum recommended human daily dose of the
rosiglitazone component of AVANDAMET, respectively) diminished the follicular
phase rise in serum estradiol with consequential reduction in the luteinizing hormone
surge, lower luteal phase progesterone levels, and amenorrhea. The mechanism
for these effects appears to be direct inhibition of ovarian steroidogenesis.
Metformin
Long-term carcinogenicity studies have been performed in
rats (dosing duration of 104 weeks) and mice (dosing duration of 91 weeks) at
doses up to and including 900 mg/kg/day and 1,500 mg/kg/day, respectively.
These doses are both approximately 4 times the maximum recommended human daily
dose of 2,000 mg of the metformin component of AVANDAMET based on body surface
area comparisons. No evidence of carcinogenicity with metformin was found in
either male or female mice. Similarly, there was no tumorigenic potential
observed with metformin in male rats. There was, however, an increased
incidence of benign stromal uterine polyps in female rats treated with 900
mg/kg/day.
There was no evidence of mutagenic potential of metformin
in the following in vitro tests: Ames test (S. typhimurium), gene
mutation test (mouse lymphoma cells), or chromosomal aberrations test (human
lymphocytes). Results in the in vivo mouse micronucleus test were also negative.
Fertility of male or female rats was unaffected by
metformin when administered at doses as high as 600 mg/kg/day, which is
approximately 3 times the maximum recommended human daily dose of the metformin
component of AVANDAMET based on body surface area comparisons.
Use In Specific Populations
Pregnancy
Pregnancy Category C.
All pregnancies have a background risk of birth defects,
loss, or other adverse outcome regardless of drug exposure. This background
risk is increased in pregnancies complicated by hyperglycemia and may be
decreased with good metabolic control. It is essential for patients with
diabetes or history of gestational diabetes to maintain good metabolic control
before conception and throughout pregnancy. Careful monitoring of glucose
control is essential in such patients. Most experts recommend that insulin
monotherapy be used during pregnancy to maintain blood glucose levels as close
to normal as possible. AVANDAMET should be used during pregnancy only if the
potential benefit justifies the potential risk to the fetus.
Human Data
There are no adequate and well-controlled trials with AVANDAMET
or its individual components in pregnant women. Rosiglitazone has been reported
to cross the human placenta and be detectable in fetal tissue. The clinical
significance of these findings is unknown.
Animal Studies
No animal studies have been conducted with AVANDAMET. The
following data are based on findings in studies performed with rosiglitazone or
metformin individually.
Rosiglitazone: There was no effect on implantation
or the embryo with rosiglitazone treatment during early pregnancy in rats, but
treatment during mid-late gestation was associated with fetal death and growth
retardation in both rats and rabbits. Teratogenicity was not observed at doses
up to 3 mg/kg in rats and 100 mg/kg in rabbits (approximately 20 and 75 times
human AUC at the maximum recommended human daily dose of the rosiglitazone
component of AVANDAMET, respectively). Rosiglitazone caused placental pathology
in rats (3 mg/kg/day). Treatment of rats during gestation through lactation
reduced litter size, neonatal viability, and postnatal growth, with growth
retardation reversible after puberty. For effects on the placenta, embryo/fetus,
and offspring, the no-effect dose was 0.2 mg/kg/day in rats and 15 mg/kg/day in
rabbits. These no-effect levels are approximately 4 times human AUC at the
maximum recommended human daily dose of the rosiglitazone component of
AVANDAMET. Rosiglitazone reduced the number of uterine implantations and live
offspring when juvenile female rats were treated at 40 mg/kg/day from 27 days
of age through to sexual maturity (approximately 68 times human AUC at the
maximum recommended daily dose). The no-effect level was 2 mg/kg/day
(approximately 4 times human AUC at the maximum recommended daily dose). There
was no effect on pre- or post-natal survival or growth.
Metformin: Metformin was not teratogenic in rats
and rabbits at doses up to 600 mg/kg/day. This represents an exposure of about
2 and 6 times the maximum recommended human daily dose of 2,000 mg based on
body surface area comparisons for rats and rabbits, respectively. Determination
of fetal concentrations demonstrated a partial placental barrier to metformin.
Labor And Delivery
The effect of AVANDAMET or its components on labor and
delivery in humans is unknown.
Nursing Mothers
No studies have been conducted with AVANDAMET. In studies
performed with the individual components, both rosiglitazone-related material
and metformin were detectable in milk from lactating rats. It is not known
whether rosiglitazone or metformin is excreted in human milk. Because many
drugs are excreted in human milk, a decision should be made whether to discontinue
nursing or to discontinue AVANDAMET, taking into account the importance of the drug
to the mother.
Pediatric Use
Safety and effectiveness of AVANDAMET in pediatric
patients have not been established. AVANDAMET and rosiglitazone are not
indicated for use in pediatric patients.
Geriatric Use
Metformin is known to be substantially excreted by the
kidney and because the risk of serious adverse reactions to the drug is greater
in patients with impaired renal function, AVANDAMET should only be used in
patients with normal renal function [see CONTRAINDICATIONS, WARNINGS
AND PRECAUTIONS, CLINICAL PHARMACOLOGY]. Because reduced renal
function is associated with increasing age, AVANDAMET should be used with caution
in elderly patients. Care should be taken in dose selection and should be based
on careful and regular monitoring of renal function. Generally, elderly
patients should not be titrated to the maximum dose of AVANDAMET [see DOSAGE
AND ADMINISTRATION, WARNINGS AND PRECAUTIONS].