CLINICAL PHARMACOLOGY
Mechanism Of Action
The growth of many cancers of
the breast is stimulated or maintained by estrogens.
In postmenopausal women,
estrogens are mainly derived from the action of the aromatase enzyme, which
converts adrenal androgens (primarily androstenedione and testosterone) to
estrone and estradiol. The suppression of estrogen biosynthesis in peripheral tissues
and in the cancer tissue itself can therefore be achieved by specifically
inhibiting the aromatase enzyme.
Anastrozole is a selective
non-steroidal aromatase inhibitor. It significantly lowers serum estradiol
concentrations and has no detectable effect on formation of adrenal
corticosteroids or aldosterone.
Pharmacodynamics
Effect on Estradiol
Mean serum concentrations of
estradiol were evaluated in multiple daily dosing trials with 0.5, 1, 3, 5, and
10 mg of ARIMIDEX in postmenopausal women with advanced breast cancer.
Clinically significant suppression of serum estradiol was seen with all doses.
Doses of 1 mg and higher resulted in suppression of mean serum concentrations
of estradiol to the lower limit of detection (3.7 pmol/L). The
recommended daily dose, ARIMIDEX 1 mg, reduced estradiol by approximately 70%
within 24 hours and by approximately 80% after 14 days of daily dosing.
Suppression of serum estradiol was maintained for up to 6 days after cessation
of daily dosing with ARIMIDEX 1 mg.
The effect of ARIMIDEX in premenopausal women with early
or advanced breast cancer has not been studied. Because aromatization of
adrenal androgens is not a significant source of estradiol in premenopausal
women, ARIMIDEX would not be expected to lower estradiol levels in
premenopausal women.
Effect on Corticosteroids
In multiple daily dosing trials with 3, 5, and 10 mg, the
selectivity of anastrozole was assessed by examining effects on corticosteroid
synthesis. For all doses, anastrozole did not affect cortisol or aldosterone
secretion at baseline or in response to ACTH. No glucocorticoid or
mineralocorticoid replacement therapy is necessary with anastrozole.
Other Endocrine Effects
In multiple daily dosing trials with 5 and 10 mg, thyroid
stimulating hormone (TSH) was measured; there was no increase in TSH during the
administration of ARIMIDEX. ARIMIDEX does not possess direct progestogenic,
androgenic, or estrogenic activity in animals, but does perturb the circulating
levels of progesterone, androgens, and estrogens.
Pharmacokinetics
Absorption
Inhibition of aromatase activity is primarily due to
anastrozole, the parent drug. Absorption of anastrozole is rapid and maximum
plasma concentrations typically occur within 2 hours of dosing under fasted
conditions. Studies with radiolabeled drug have demonstrated that orally
administered anastrozole is well absorbed into the systemic circulation. Food
reduces the rate but not the overall extent of anastrozole absorption. The mean
C max of anastrozole decreased by 16% and the median Tmax was delayed from 2 to
5 hours when anastrozole was administered 30 minutes after food. The
pharmacokinetics of anastrozole are linear over the dose range of 1 to 20 mg,
and do not change with repeated dosing. The pharmacokinetics of anastrozole
were similar in patients and healthy volunteers.
Distribution
Steady-state plasma levels are approximately 3-to 4-fold
higher than levels observed after a single dose of ARIMIDEX. Plasma concentrations
approach steady-state levels at about 7 days of once daily dosing. Anastrozole
is 40% bound to plasma proteins in the therapeutic range.
Metabolism
Metabolism of anastrozole occurs by N-dealkylation,
hydroxylation and glucuronidation. Three metabolites of anastrozole (triazole,
a glucuronide conjugate of hydroxy-anastrozole, and a glucuronide conjugate of
anastrozole itself) have been identified in human plasma and urine. The major
circulating metabolite of anastrozole, triazole, lacks pharmacologic activity.
Anastrozole inhibited reactions catalyzed by cytochrome
P450 1A2, 2C8/9, and 3A4 in vitro with Ki values which were approximately 30
times higher than the mean steady-state Cmax values observed following a 1 mg
daily dose. Anastrozole had no inhibitory effect on reactions catalyzed by
cytochrome P450 2A6 or 2D6 in vitro. Administration of a single 30 mg/kg or
multiple 10 mg/kg doses of anastrozole to healthy subjects had no effect on the
clearance of antipyrine or urinary recovery of antipyrine metabolites.
Excretion
Eighty-five percent of radiolabeled anastrozole was recovered
in feces and urine. Hepatic metabolism accounts for approximately 85% of
anastrozole elimination. Renal elimination accounts for approximately 10% of
total clearance. The mean elimination half-life of anastrozole is 50 hours.
Effect of Gender and Age
Anastrozole pharmacokinetics have been investigated in
postmenopausal female volunteers and patients with breast cancer. No
age-related effects were seen over the range < 50 to > 80 years.
Effect of Race
Estradiol and estrone sulfate serum levels were similar
between Japanese and Caucasian postmenopausal women who received 1 mg of
anastrozole daily for 16 days. Anastrozole mean steady-state minimum plasma
concentrations in Caucasian and Japanese postmenopausal women were 25.7 and
30.4 ng/mL, respectively.
Effect of Renal Impairment
Anastrozole pharmacokinetics have been investigated in
subjects with renal impairment. Anastrozole renal clearance decreased
proportionally with creatinine clearance and was approximately 50% lower in
volunteers with severe renal impairment (creatinine clearance < 30
mL/min/1.73m²) compared to
controls. Total clearance was only reduced 10%. No dosage adjustment is needed
for renal impairment [see DOSAGE AND ADMINISTRATION and Use in
Specific Populations].
Effect of Hepatic Impairment
Anastrozole pharmacokinetics have been investigated in
subjects with hepatic cirrhosis related to alcohol abuse. The apparent oral
clearance (CL/F) of anastrozole was approximately 30% lower in subjects with
stable hepatic cirrhosis than in control subjects with normal liver function.
However, these plasma concentrations were still with the range of values
observed in normal subjects. The effect of severe hepatic impairment was not
studied. No dose adjustment is necessary for stable hepatic cirrhosis [see DOSAGE
AND ADMINISTRATION and Use In Specific Populations].
Animal Toxicology And/Or Pharmacology
Reproductive Toxicology
Anastrozole has been found to cross the placenta
following oral administration of 0.1 mg/kg in rats and rabbits (about 1 and 1.9
times the recommended human dose, respectively, on a mg/m² basis). Studies in both rats and
rabbits at doses equal to or greater than 0.1 and 0.02 mg/kg/day, respectively
(about 1 and 1/3, respectively, the recommended human dose on a mg/m² basis), administered during the
period of organogenesis showed that anastrozole increased pregnancy loss
(increased pre-and/or post-implantation loss, increased resorption, and
decreased numbers of live fetuses); effects were dose related in rats.
Placental weights were significantly increased in rats at doses of 0.1
mg/kg/day or more.
Evidence of fetotoxicity, including delayed fetal
development (i.e., incomplete ossification and depressed fetal body weights),
was observed in rats administered doses of 1 mg/kg/day (which produced plasma
anastrozole Cssmax and AUC 0-24 hr that were 19 times and 9 times higher than the
respective values found in postmenopausal volunteers at the recommended dose).
There was no evidence of teratogenicity in rats administered doses up to 1.0
mg/kg/day. In rabbits, anastrozole caused pregnancy failure at doses equal to
or greater than 1.0 mg/kg/day (about 16 times the recommended human dose on a
mg/m² basis); there was no
evidence of teratogenicity in rabbits administered 0.2 mg/kg/day (about 3 times
the recommended human dose on a mg/m²
basis).
Clinical Studies
Adjuvant Treatment Of Breast Cancer In Postmenopausal
Women
A multicenter, double-blind trial (ATAC) randomized 9,366
postmenopausal women with operable breast cancer to adjuvant treatment with
ARIMIDEX 1 mg daily, tamoxifen 20 mg daily, or a combination of the two
treatments for five years or until recurrence of the disease.
The primary endpoint of the trial was disease-free
survival (i.e., time to occurrence of a distant or local recurrence, or
contralateral breast cancer or death from any cause). Secondary endpoints of
the trial included distant disease-free survival, the incidence of
contralateral breast cancer and overall survival. At a median follow-up of 33
months, the combination of ARIMIDEX and tamoxifen did not demonstrate any efficacy
benefit when compared with tamoxifen in all patients as well as in the hormone
receptor positive subpopulation. This treatment arm was discontinued from the
trial. Based on clinical and pharmacokinetic results from the ATAC trial,
tamoxifen should not be administered with anastrozole [see DRUG INTERACTIONS].
Demographic and other baseline characteristics were
similar among the three treatment groups (see Table 7).
Table 7: Demographic and Baseline Characteristics for
ATAC Trial
Demographic Characteristic |
ARIMIDEX 1 mg
(N*=3125) |
Tamoxifen 20 mg
(N*=3116) |
ARIMIDEX 1 mg plus Tamoxifen†20 mg
(N*=3125) |
Mean age (yrs.) |
64.1 |
64.1 |
64.3 |
Age Range (yrs.) |
38.1 - 92.8 |
32.8 - 94.9 |
37.0 - 92.2 |
Age Distribution (%) |
< 45 yrs. |
0.7 |
0.4 |
0.5 |
45-60 yrs. |
34.6 |
35.0 |
34.5 |
> 60 < 70 yrs. |
38.0 |
37.1 |
37.7 |
> 70 yrs. |
26.7 |
27.4 |
27.3 |
Mean Weight (kg) |
70.8 |
71.1 |
71.3 |
Receptor Status (%) |
|
|
|
Positive‡ |
83.5 |
83.1 |
84.0 |
Negative§ |
7.4 |
8.0 |
7.0 |
Other¶ |
8.8 |
8.6 |
9.0 |
|
|
|
|
Other Treatment (%) prior to Randomization |
Mastectomy |
47.8 |
47.3 |
48.1 |
Breast conservation# |
52.3 |
52.8 |
51.9 |
Axillary surgery |
95.5 |
95.7 |
95.2 |
Radiotherapy |
63.3 |
62.5 |
61.9 |
Chemotherapy |
22.3 |
20.8 |
20.8 |
Neoadjuvant Tamoxifen |
1.6 |
1.6 |
1.7 |
Primary Tumor Size (%) |
T1( ≤ 2cm) |
63.9 |
62.9 |
64.1 |
T2 ( > 2 cm and ≤ 5 cm) |
32.6 |
34.2 |
32.9 |
T3( > 5cm) |
2.7 |
2.2 |
2.3 |
Nodal Status (%) |
|
|
|
Node positive |
34.9 |
33.6 |
33.5 |
1-3 (# of nodes) |
24.4 |
24.4 |
24.3 |
4-9 |
7.5 |
6.4 |
6.8 |
> 9 |
2.9 |
2.7 |
2.3 |
Tumor Grade (%) |
Well-differentiated |
20.8 |
20.5 |
21.2 |
Moderately differentiated |
46.8 |
47.8 |
46.5 |
Poorly/undifferentiated |
23.7 |
23.3 |
23.7 |
Not assessed/recorded |
8.7 |
8.4 |
8.5 |
* N=Number of patients randomized to the treatment
†The combination arm was discontinued due to lack of efficacy benefit at 33
months of follow-up
‡ Includes patients who were estrogen receptor (ER) positive or progesterone
receptor (PgR) positive, or both positive
§ Includes patients with both
ER negative and PgR negative receptor status
¶Includes all other
combinations of ER and PgR receptor status unknown
#Among the patients who had breast conservation, radiotherapy was administered
to 95.0% of patients in the ARIMIDEX arm, 94.1% in the tamoxifen arm and 94.5%
in the ARIMIDEX plus tamoxifen arm. |
Patients in the two monotherapy
arms of the ATAC trial were treated for a median of 60 months (5 years) and
followed for a median of 68 months. Disease-free survival in the
intent-to-treat population was statistically significantly improved [Hazard
Ratio (HR) = 0.87, 95% CI: 0.78, 0.97, p=0.0127] in the ARIMIDEX arm compared
to the tamoxifen arm. In the hormone receptor-positive subpopulation
representing about 84% of the trial patients, disease-free survival was also
statistically significantly improved (HR = 0.83, 95% CI: 0.73, 0.94, p=0.0049)
in the ARIMIDEX arm compared to the tamoxifen arm.
Figure 1: Disease-Free Survival Kaplan Meier Survival
Curve for all Patients Randomized to ARIMIDEX or Tamoxifen Monotherapy in the
ATAC trial (Intent-to-Treat)
Figure 2: Disease-free
Survival for Hormone Receptor-Positive Subpopulation of Patients Randomized to
ARIMIDEX or Tamoxifen Monotherapy in the ATAC Trial
The survival data with 68
months follow-up is presented in Table 9.
In the group of patients who had previous adjuvant
chemotherapy (N=698 for ARIMIDEX and N=647 for tamoxifen), the hazard ratio for
disease-free survival was 0.91 (95% CI: 0.73 to 1.13) in the ARIMIDEX arm
compared to the tamoxifen arm.
The frequency of individual events in the intent-to-treat
population and the hormone receptor-positive subpopulation are described in
Table 8.
Table 8 :All Recurrence and Death Events*
|
Intent-To-Treat Population‡ |
Hormone Receptor-Positive Subpopulation‡ |
|
ARIMIDEX 1 mg
(N† -3125) |
Tamoxifen 20 mg
(N†=3116) |
ARIMIDEX 1 mg
(N†-2618) |
Tamoxifen 20 mg
(N†=2598 |
Median Duration of Therapy (mo) |
60 |
60 |
60 |
60 |
Median Efficacy Follow-up (mo) |
68 |
68 |
68 |
68 |
Loco-regional recurrence |
119 (3.8) |
149 (4.8) |
76 (2.9) |
101 (3.9) |
Contralateral breast cancer |
35 (1.1) |
59 (1.9) |
26 (1.0) |
54 (2.1) |
Invasive |
27 (0.9) |
52 (1.7) |
21 (0.8) |
48 (1.8) |
Ductal carcinoma in situ |
8 (0.3) |
6 (0.2) |
5 (0.2) |
5 (0.2) |
Unknown |
0 |
1 ( < 0.1) |
0 |
1 ( < 0.1) |
Distant recurrence |
324 (10.4) |
375 (12.0) |
226 (8.6) |
265 (10.2) |
Death from Any Cause |
411 (13.2) |
420 (13.5) |
296 (11.3) |
301 (11.6) |
Death breast cancer |
218 (7.0) |
248 (8.0) |
138 (5.3) |
160 (6.2) |
Death other reason (including unknown) |
193 (6.2) |
172 (5.5) |
158 (6.0) |
141 (5.4) |
* The combination arm was discontinued due to lack of
efficacy benefit at 33 months of follow-up.
†N=Number of patients randomized.
‡ Patients may fall into more than one category. |
A summary of the study efficacy
results is provided in Table 9.
Table 9: ATAC Efficacy
Summary*
|
Intent-To-Treat Population |
Hormone Receptor-Positive Subpopulation |
ARIMIDEX 1 mg
(N=3125) |
Tamoxifen 20 mg
(N=3116) |
ARIMIDEX 1 mg
(N=2618) |
Tamoxifen20 mg
(N=2598) |
Number of Events |
Number of Events |
Disease- free Survival |
575 |
651 |
424 |
497 |
Hazard ratio |
0.87 |
0.83 |
2-sided 95% CI |
0.78 to 0.97 |
0.73 to 0.94 |
p-value |
0.0127 |
0.0049 |
Distant Disease- free Survival |
500 |
530 |
370 |
394 |
Hazard ratio |
0.94 |
0.93 |
2-sided 95% CI |
0.83 to 1.06 |
0.80 to 1.07 |
Overall Survival |
411 |
420 |
296 |
301 |
Hazard ratio |
0.97 |
0.97 |
2-sided 95% CI |
0.85 to 1.12 |
0.83 to 1.14 |
* The combination arm was
discontinued due to lack of efficacy benefit at 33 months of follow-up. |
10-year median follow-up
Efficacy Results from the ATAC Trial
In a subsequent analysis of the
ATAC trial, patients in the two monotherapy arms were followed for a median of
120 months (10 years). Patients received study treatment for a median of 60
months (5 years) (see Table 10).
Table 10: Efficacy Summary
|
Intent-To-Treat Population |
Hormone Receptor- Positive Subpopulation |
ARIMIDEX 1 mg
(N=3125) |
Tamoxifen 20 mg
(N=3116) |
ARIMIDEX 1 mg
(N=2618) |
Tamoxifen 20 mg
(N=2598) |
Number of Events |
Number of Events |
Disease- free Survival |
953 |
1022 |
735 |
924 |
Hazard ratio |
0.91 |
0.86 |
2-sided 95% CI |
0.83 to 0.99 |
0.78 to 0.95 |
p-value |
0.0365 |
0.0027 |
Overall Survival |
734 |
747 |
563 |
586 |
Hazard ratio |
0.97 |
0.95 |
2-sided 95% CI |
0.88 to 1.08 |
0.84 to 1.06 |
Figure 3: Disease-Free
Survival Kaplan Meier Survival Curve for all Patients Randomized to ARIMIDEX or
Tamoxifen Monotherapy in the ATAC Trial (Intent-to-Treat)a
a The proportion of patients with 120 months' follow-up was
29.4%.
Figure 4: Disease-Free Survival for Hormone
Receptor-Positive Subpopulation of Patients Randomized to ARIMIDEX or Tamoxifen
Monotherapy in the ATAC Trialb
bThe proportion of patients with 120 months' follow-up was
29.8%.
First-Line Therapy In Postmenopausal
Women With Advanced Breast Cancer
Two double-blind, controlled
clinical studies of similar design (0030, a North American study and 0027, a
predominately European study) were conducted to assess the efficacy of ARIMIDEX
compared with tamoxifen as first-line therapy for hormone receptor positive or
hormone receptor unknown locally advanced or metastatic breast cancer in
postmenopausal women. A total of 1021 patients between the ages of 30 and 92
years old were randomized to receive trial treatment. Patients were randomized
to receive 1 mg of ARIMIDEX once daily or 20 mg of tamoxifen once daily. The
primary endpoints for both trials were time to tumor progression, objective
tumor response rate, and safety.
Demographics and other baseline
characteristics, including patients who had measurable and no measurable
disease, patients who were given previous adjuvant therapy, the site of
metastatic disease and ethnic origin were similar for the two treatment groups
for both trials. The following table summarizes the hormone receptor status at
entry for all randomized patients in trials 0030 and 0027.
Table 11 : Demographic and Other Baseline
Characteristics
Receptor status |
Number (%) of subjects |
Trial 0030 |
Trial 0027 |
ARIMIDEX 1 mg
(N=171) |
Tamoxifen 20 mg
(N=182) |
ARIMIDEX 1 mg
(N=340) |
Tamoxifen 20 mg
(N=328) |
ER* and/or PgR† * |
151 (88.3) |
162 (89.0) |
154 (45.3) |
144 (43.9) |
ER* unknown, PgR† unknown |
19 (11.1) |
20 (11.0) |
185 (54.4) |
183 (55.8) |
* ER=Estrogen receptor
†PgR=Progesterone receptor |
For the primary endpoints,
trial 0030 showed that ARIMIDEX had a statistically significant advantage over
tamoxifen (p=0.006) for time to tumor progression; objective tumor response
rates were similar for ARIMIDEX and tamoxifen. Trial 0027 showed that ARIMIDEX
and tamoxifen had similar objective tumor response rates and time to tumor
progression (see Table 12 and Figures 5 and 6).
Table 12 below summarizes the results
of trial 0030 and trial 0027 for the primary efficacy endpoints.
Table 12 : Â Efficacy Results
of First-line Treatment
Endpoint |
Trial 0030 |
Trial 0027 |
ARIMIDEX 1 mg
(N=171) |
Tamoxifen 20 mg
(N=182) |
ARIMIDEX 1 mg
(N=340) |
Tamoxifen 20 mg
(N=328) |
Time to progression (TTP) |
Median TTP (months) |
11.1 |
5.6 |
8.2 |
8.3 |
Number (%) of subjects who progressed |
114 (67%) |
138 (76%) |
249 (73%) |
247 (75%) |
Hazard ratio (LCL* )† |
1.42 (1.15) |
1.01 (0.87) |
2-sided 95% CI‡ |
(1.11,1.82) |
(0.85,1.20) |
p-value§ |
0.0 |
06 |
0.9 |
20 |
Best objective response rate |
Number (%) of subjects With CR¶ + PR# |
36 (21.1%) |
31 (17.0%) |
112 (32.9%) |
107 (32.6%) |
Odds Ratio (LCL* )♣ |
1.30 (0.83) |
1.01 (0.77) |
* LCL=Lower Confidence Limit
†Tamoxifen:ARIMIDEX
‡ CI=Confidence Interval
§ Two-sided Log Rank
¶CR=Complete Response
# PR=Partial Response
♣Â ARIMIDEX:Tamoxifen |
Figure 5 : Kaplan-Meier
probability of time to disease progression for all randomized patients
(intent-to-treat) in Trial 0030
Figure 6 : Kaplan-Meier
probability of time to progression for all randomized patients
(intent-to-treat) in Trial 0027
Results from the secondary
endpoints were supportive of the results of the primary efficacy endpoints.
There were too few deaths occurring across treatment groups of both trials to
draw conclusions on overall survival differences.
Second-Line Therapy In Postmenopausal Women With Advanced
Breast Cancer Who Had Disease Progression Following Tamoxifen Therapy
Anastrozole was studied in two
controlled clinical trials (0004, a North American study; 0005, a predominately
European study) in postmenopausal women with advanced breast cancer who had disease
progression following tamoxifen therapy for either advanced or early breast
cancer. Some of the patients had also received previous cytotoxic treatment.
Most patients were ER-positive; a smaller fraction were ER-unknown or
ER-negative; the ER-negative patients were eligible only if they had had a
positive response to tamoxifen. Eligible patients with measurable and
non-measurable disease were randomized to receive either a single daily dose of
1 mg or 10 mg of ARIMIDEX or megestrol acetate 40 mg four times a day. The
studies were double-blinded with respect to ARIMIDEX. Time to progression and
objective response (only patients with measurable disease could be considered
partial responders) rates were the primary efficacy variables. Objective
response rates were calculated based on the Union Internationale Contre le
Cancer (UICC) criteria. The rate of prolonged (more than 24 weeks) stable
disease, the rate of progression, and survival were also calculated.
Both trials included over 375
patients; demographics and other baseline characteristics were similar for the
three treatment groups in each trial. Patients in the 0005 trial had responded
better to prior tamoxifen treatment. Of the patients entered who had prior
tamoxifen therapy for advanced disease (58% in Trial 0004; 57% in Trial 0005),
18% of these patients in Trial 0004 and 42% in Trial 0005 were reported by the
primary investigator to have responded. In Trial 0004, 81% of patients were
ER-positive, 13% were ER-unknown, and 6% were ER-negative. In Trial 0005, 58%
of patients were ER-positive, 37% were ER-unknown, and 5% were ER-negative. In
Trial 0004, 62% of patients had measurable disease compared to 79% in Trial
0005. The sites of metastatic disease were similar among treatment groups for
each trial. On average, 40% of the patients had soft tissue metastases; 60% had
bone metastases; and 40% had visceral (15% liver) metastases.
Efficacy results from the two
studies were similar as presented in Table 13. In both studies there were no
significant differences between treatment arms with respect to any of the
efficacy parameters listed in the table below.
Table 13 : Efficacy Results
of Second-line Treatment
|
ARIMIDEX 1 mg |
ARIMIDEX 10 mg |
Megestrol Acetate 160 mg |
Trial 0004 (N. America) |
(N=128) |
(N=130) |
(N=128) |
Median Follow-up (months)* |
31.3 |
30.9 |
32.9 |
Median Time to Death (months) |
29.6 |
25.7 |
26.7 |
|
|
|
|
2 Year Survival Probability (%) |
62.0 |
58.0 |
53.1 |
Median Time to Progression (months) |
5.7 |
5.3 |
5.1 |
Objective Response (all patients) (%) |
12.5 |
10.0 |
10.2 |
Stable Disease for > 24 weeks (%) |
35.2 |
29.2 |
32.8 |
Progression (%) |
86.7 |
85.4 |
90.6 |
Trial 0005 (Europe, Australia, S. Africa) |
(N=135) |
(N=118) |
(N=125) |
Median Follow-up (months)* |
31.0 |
30.9 |
31.5 |
Median Time to Death (months) |
24.3 |
24.8 |
19.8 |
2 Year Survival Probability (%) |
50.5 |
50.9 |
39.1 |
Median Time to Progression (months) |
4.4 |
5.3 |
3.9 |
Objective Response |
12.6 |
15.3 |
14.4 |
(all patients) (%) |
|
|
|
Stable Disease for > 24 weeks (%) |
24.4 |
25.4 |
23.2 |
Progression (%) |
91.9 |
89.8 |
92.0 |
* Surviving Patients |
When data from the two
controlled trials are pooled, the objective response rates and median times to
progression and death were similar for patients randomized to ARIMIDEX 1 mg and
megestrol acetate. There is, in this data, no indication that ARIMIDEX 10 mg is
superior to ARIMIDEX 1 mg.
Table 14 : Pooled Efficacy
Results of Second-line Treatment
Trials 0004 & 0005 (Pooled Data) |
ARIMIDEX 1 mg
N=263 |
ARIMIDEX 10 mg
N=248 |
Megestrol Acetate 160 mg
N=253 |
Median Time to Death (months) |
26.7 |
25.5 |
22.5 |
2 Year Survival Probability (%) |
56.1 |
54.6 |
46.3 |
Median Time to Progression |
4.8 |
5.3 |
4.6 |
Objective Response (all patients) (%) |
12.5 |
12.5 |
12.3 |