SIDE EFFECTS
The following adverse reactions are discussed in greater
detail in other sections of the labeling:
- Transient Amnestic Episodes [see WARNINGS AND
PRECAUTIONS].
- Risk of BF-RhodoLED Lamp Induced Eye Injury [see WARNINGS
AND PRECAUTIONS].
- Increased Photosensitivity [see WARNINGS AND
PRECAUTIONS].
- Risk of Bleeding in Patients with Coagulation Disorders
[see WARNINGS AND PRECAUTIONS].
- Ophthalmic Adverse Reactions [see WARNINGS AND
PRECAUTIONS].
- Risk of Mucous Membrane Irritation [see WARNINGS AND
PRECAUTIONS].
Clinical Trial Experience
Because clinical trials are conducted under widely varying
conditions, adverse reaction rates observed in the clinical trials of a drug
cannot be directly compared to rates in the clinical trials of another drug and
may not reflect the rates observed in practice.
The clinical program for AMELUZ included three double-blind
and placebo-controlled trials (Trials 1, 2, and 3), enrolling a total of 299
subjects that were treated with narrow band light. Trial subjects were adults
greater than or equal to 49 years of age, and the majority had Fitzpatrick skin
type I, II, or III. No subjects had Fitzpatrick skin type V or VI.
Approximately 86% of subjects were male, and all subjects were Caucasian.
For all trials, the enrolled subjects had mild to
moderate AKs (Olsen grade 1 and 2) with 4 to 8 lesions on the face and scalp.
Overall, 87 placebo-treated subjects (n=16, n=32, n=39) and 212 AMELUZ-treated
subjects (n=32, n=55, and n=125) were illuminated with BF-RhodoLED or similar
narrow spectrum lamps.
Local skin reactions at the application site were
observed in about 99.5% of subjects treated with AMELUZ and narrow spectrum
lamps. The most frequent adverse reactions during and after PDT were
application site erythema, pain, burning, irritation, edema, pruritus,
exfoliation, scab, induration, and vesicles.
Most adverse reactions occurred during illumination or
shortly afterwards, were generally of mild or moderate intensity, and lasted
for 1 to 4 days in most cases; in some cases, however, they persisted for 1 to
2 weeks or even longer. Severe pain/burning occurred in up to 30% of subjects.
In one case, the adverse reactions required interruption or discontinuation of
the illumination.
The incidence of common (≥ 1%, <10%) and very
common (≥ 10%) adverse reactions in randomized, multicenter trials at the
application site are presented in Table 1.
Table 1: Incidence of Adverse Reactions Occurring at
≥ 1% of the AMELUZ Group and More Frequently than the Vehicle Group in the
Actinic Keratosis Trials at the Application Site
Adverse reaction |
Vehicle
n=87 |
AMELUZ
n=212 |
Adverse reactions at the application site |
Erythema |
34 (39%) |
195 (92%) |
Pain/Burning |
26 (30%) |
195 (92%) |
Irritation |
17 (20%) |
153 (72%) |
Edema |
3 (3%) |
75 (35%) |
Pruritus |
14 (16%) |
72 (34%) |
Exfoliation |
4 (5%) |
41 (19%) |
Scab |
2 (2%) |
41 (19%) |
Induration |
0 (0%) |
26 (12%) |
Vesicles |
1 (1%) |
25 (12%) |
Paresthesia |
2 (2%) |
18 (9%) |
Hyperalgesia |
0 (0%) |
13 (6%) |
Reaction |
2 (2%) |
8 (4%) |
Discomfort |
0 (0%) |
7 (3%) |
Erosion |
0 (0%) |
6 (3%) |
Discharge |
0 (0%) |
4 (2%) |
Bleeding |
0 (0%) |
3 (1%) |
Pustules |
0 (0%) |
3 (1%) |
Common (≥ 1%, <10%) adverse reactions not at the
application site for AMELUZ were headache, skin exfoliation, chills and eyelid
edema.
Less common (≥ 0.1%, <1%) adverse reactions at
the application site for AMELUZ were hemorrhage and swelling. The adverse
reactions not at the application site were blister, feeling hot, pruritus,
pyrexia, scab, nervousness, pain, petechiae, rash pustular, skin erosion and
ulcer.
In a clinical trial designed to investigate the
sensitization potential of aminolevulinic acid with 216 healthy subjects, 13
subjects (6%) developed allergic contact dermatitis after continuous exposure
for 21 days with doses of aminolevulinic acid that were higher than doses
normally used in the treatment of AK.
Postmarketing Experience
The following adverse reactions have been reported during
post-approval use of AMELUZ. Because these reactions are reported voluntarily
from a population of uncertain size, it is not always possible to reliably
estimate their frequency or establish a causal relationship to drug exposure.
Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders:
application site inflammation, application site discoloration.
Eye disorders: eye irritation, diplopia, ocular
hyperemia, photophobia, and blurred vision.
General disorders and administration site conditions:
fatigue.
Nervous system disorders: dysaesthesia, transient
amnestic episodes.
DRUG INTERACTIONS
There have been no formal studies of the interaction of
AMELUZ with other drugs. It is possible that concomitant use of other known
photosensitizing agents such as St. John's wort, griseofulvin, thiazide
diuretics, sulfonylureas, phenothiazines, sulphonamides, quinolones and tetracyclines
may enhance the phototoxic reaction to PDT [see WARNINGS AND PRECAUTIONS].