CLINICAL PHARMACOLOGY
Mechanism Of Action
Regulation of glucose
metabolism is the primary activity of insulins and insulin analogs, including
insulin lispro products. Insulins lower blood glucose by stimulating peripheral
glucose uptake by skeletal muscle and fat, and by inhibiting hepatic glucose
production. Insulins inhibit lipolysis and proteolysis, and enhance
protein synthesis.
Pharmacodynamics
Subcutaneous Administration
The pharmacodynamic profile of a single 0.3 unit/kg dose
of ADMELOG administered subcutaneously was evaluated in a euglycemic clamp
study enrolling 30 patients with type 1 diabetes. In this study, the mean (SD)
time to maximum effect of ADMELOG (measured by the peak rate of glucose
infusion) was approximately 2.07 (0.78) hours. The mean (SD) area under the
glucose infusion rate curves (measure of overall pharmacodynamic effect) and mean
(SD) maximum glucose infusion rate were 1953.5 (547.3) mg/kg and 9.97 (2.37)
mg/min/kg, respectively (see Figure 1).
Figure 1: Mean Smoothed Glucose Infusion Rate* after
Subcutaneous Injection of ADMELOG (0.3 unit/kg) in Patients with Type 1
Diabetes
* Body Weight Standardized
The time course of action of
insulin and insulin analogs, including insulin lispro products, may vary
considerably in different individuals or within the same individual. The rate
of insulin absorption, and consequently the onset of activity are known to be
affected by the site of injection, exercise, and other variables [see WARNINGS
AND PRECAUTIONS].
Intravenous Administration
The glucose lowering effect of
intravenous administration of another insulin lispro product, 100 units/mL, was
tested in 21 patients with type 1 diabetes. For the study, the patients' usual
doses of insulin were held and blood glucose concentrations were allowed to
reach a stable range of 200 to 260 mg/dL during a one to three hour run-in
phase. The run-in phase was followed by a 6-hour assessment phase. During the
assessment phase, patients received intravenous infusion of another insulin
lispro product, 100 units/mL, at an initial infusion rate of 0.5 units/hour.
The infusion rate could be adjusted at regular timed intervals to achieve and
maintain blood glucose concentrations between 100 to 160 mg/dL.
The mean blood glucose levels
during the assessment phase for patients on another insulin lispro product, 100
units/mL, therapy are summarized below in Table 2. All patients achieved the targeted
glucose range at some point during the 6-hour assessment phase. At the
endpoint, blood glucose was within the target range (100 to 160 mg/dL) for 17
of 20 patients treated with another insulin lispro product, 100 units/mL. The
average time (±SE) required to attain near normoglycemia was 129 ± 14 minutes
for another insulin lispro product, 100 units/mL.
Table 2: Mean Blood Glucose Concentrations (mg/dL)
During Intravenous Infusions of Another Insulin Lispro Product, 100 units/mL
Time from Start of Infusion (minutes) |
Mean Blood Glucose (mg/dL) Intravenous* |
0 |
224 ± 16 |
30 |
205 ± 21 |
60 |
195 ± 20 |
120 |
165 ± 26 |
180 |
140 ± 26 |
240 |
123 ± 20 |
300 |
120 ± 27 |
360 |
122 ± 25 |
* Results shown as mean ± SD |
Pharmacokinetics
Absorption
The pharmacokinetic profile of
a single 0.3 unit/kg dose of ADMELOG administered subcutaneously was evaluated
in a study enrolling 30 patients with type 1 diabetes. In this study, the mean
observed area under the plasma insulin lispro concentration-time curve from
time zero to infinity and peak plasma insulin lispro concentration were 12800
pg•hr/mL and 5070 pg/mL, respectively. The median time to maximum plasma insulin
lispro concentration was 0.83 hours after injection (see Figure 2).
Figure 2: Mean plasma
Concentrations of ADMELOG after a Single Subcutaneous Administration of ADMELOG
(0.3 unit/kg) in Patients with Type 1 Diabetes
The absolute bioavailability of
another insulin lispro product, 100 units/mL, after subcutaneous injection
ranges from 55% to 77% with doses between 0.1 to 0.2 unit/kg, inclusive.
Distribution
When administered intravenously
as bolus injections of 0.1 and 0.2 unit/kg dose in two separate groups of
healthy subjects, the mean volume of distribution of another insulin lispro
product, 100 units/mL, appeared to decrease with increase in dose (1.55 and
0.72 L/kg, respectively).
Elimination
Metabolism
Human metabolism studies have
not been conducted. However, animal studies indicate that the metabolism of
another insulin lispro product, 100 units/mL, is identical to that of regular
human insulin.
Excretion
When administered
intravenously, another insulin lispro product, 100 units/mL demonstrated
dose-dependent clearance, with a mean clearance of 21.0 mL/min/kg (0.1 unit/kg
dose), and 9.6 mL/min/kg (0.2 unit/kg dose). Another insulin lispro product,
100 units/mL, demonstrated a mean t½ of 0.85 hours (51 minutes) and 0.92
hours (55 minutes), respectively for 0.1 unit/kg and 0.2 unit/kg doses.
Specific Populations
The effects of age, gender,
race, obesity, pregnancy, or smoking on the pharmacokinetics of ADMELOG have
not been studied.
Patients With Renal Impairment
Type 2 diabetic patients with
varying degrees of renal impairment showed no difference in pharmacokinetics of
another insulin lispro product, 100 units/mL. However, the sensitivity of the
patients to insulin did change, with an increased response to insulin as the
renal function declined. Some studies with human insulin have shown increased
circulating levels of insulin in patients with renal impairment. Careful
glucose monitoring and dose adjustments of insulin, including ADMELOG, may be
necessary in patients with renal dysfunction.
Patients With Hepatic Impairment
Type 2 diabetic patients with impaired hepatic function
showed no effect on the pharmacokinetics of another insulin lispro product, 100
units/mL, as compared to patients with no hepatic dysfunction. However, some
studies with human insulin have shown increased circulating levels of insulin
in patients with liver failure. Careful glucose monitoring and dose adjustments
of insulin, including ADMELOG, may be necessary in patients with hepatic
dysfunction.
Clinical Studies
Overview Of Clinical Studies
The safety and effectiveness of ADMELOG have been
established based on adequate and well controlled studies of ADMELOG in adult
patients with type 1 and type 2 diabetes mellitus, and based on adequate and
well controlled studies of another insulin lispro product, 100 units/mL, in
adult and pediatric patients 3 years of age and older with type 1 diabetes
mellitus and adult patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus.
The safety and effectiveness of ADMELOG were studied in
507 adult patients with type 1 diabetes and 505 adult patients with type 2
diabetes.
The safety and effectiveness of another insulin lispro
product, 100 units/mL, were studied in 1,087 adult and pediatric patients with
type 1 diabetes and in 722 adult patients with type 2 diabetes.
Type 1 Diabetes Mellitus - Subcutaneous Injection
ADMELOG: Study In Adult Patients
A 26-week open-label, active-controlled study
(NCT02273180) evaluated the glucose lowering effect of ADMELOG plus insulin
glargine, 100 units/mL, compared to that of Comparator (another insulin lispro
product, 100 units/mL, or a non-U.S.-approved insulin lispro, 100 units/mL),
plus insulin glargine, 100 units/mL. A total of 507 patients with type 1
diabetes mellitus treated with insulin glargine 100 units/mL and rapid-acting
mealtime insulin analogs participated in the study. Patients were randomized to
ADMELOG (n=253) or Comparator (n=254). ADMELOG or Comparator was administered
by subcutaneous injection immediately prior to meals.
The mean age of these subjects was 43 years, and 59.6%
were male. The population was 82.1% White, 4.7% Black or African American and
5.3% were Hispanic. The population had type 1 diabetes mellitus for a mean
duration of 19 years. The mean eGFR was 90.6 mL/min/1.73 m² and 48.7% of patients
had GFR ≥90 mL/min/1.73 m². The mean BMI was approximately 26 kg/m². At
baseline, 60.6%, 37.5% and 2.0% of the patients were using other insulin lispro
products, 100 units/mL, insulin aspart, 100 units/mL, or both, respectively.
At week 26, treatment with ADMELOG provided a mean
reduction in HbA1c that was non-inferior to that achieved with the Comparator
(see Table 3).
Table 3: Type 1 Diabetes Mellitus - Adults - Mean
Change in HbA1c (ADMELOG plus Insulin Glargine, 100 units/mL, versus Comparator
plus Insulin Glargine, 100 units/mL)
Treatment Duration Treatment in Combination with: |
26 Weeks Insulin Glargine |
ADMELOG |
Comparator |
N* |
253 |
254 |
HbA1c (%) |
Baseline (mean) |
8.08 |
7.99 |
Adjusted mean change from baseline* |
-0.40 |
-0.46 |
Adjusted mean difference§ |
0.06 |
(95% CI) |
(-0.086 to 0.201) |
* ITT: Intent-to-treat; all
randomized patients.
‡ Estimated using a multiple imputation method that models a “return to
baseline” for patients having missing data who discontinued treatment. ANCOVA
was used with treatment and stratification groups as fixed factors and baseline
HbA1c as a covariate.
§ Treatment difference: ADMELOG -Comparator |
Another Insulin Lispro Product,
100 units/mL: Study In Adult And Pediatric Patients 12 Years Of Age And Older
A 12-month, randomized,
parallel, open-label, active-controlled study was conducted in 167 patients
with type 1 diabetes to assess the safety and efficacy of another insulin
lispro product, 100 units/mL (n=81), compared with regular human
insulin, 100 units/mL (n=86). This other insulin lispro product was
administered by subcutaneous injection immediately prior to meals and regular
human insulin was administered 30 to 45 minutes before meals. Human insulin
extended zinc suspension was administered once or twice daily as the basal
insulin. There was a 2 to 4-week run-in period with regular human insulin and
human insulin extended zinc suspension before randomization.
The mean age of these subjects was 31 years (range 12 to
70 years), and 47% were male. The population was 97% White.
Table 4: Type 1 Diabetes Mellitus - Adults and
Pediatric Patients 12 Years of Age and Older - Mean Change in HbA1c% (another
insulin lispro product, 100 units/mL, versus regular human insulin, 100
units/mL)
Treatment Duration Treatment in Combination with: |
12 Months Human Insulin Extended Zinc |
Another Insulin Lispro Product |
Regular Human Insulin |
N |
81 |
86 |
Baseline HbA1c (%)* |
8.2 ± 1.4 |
8.3 ± 1.7 |
Change from baseline HbA1c (%)a |
-0.1 ± 0.9 |
0.1 ± 1.1 |
Treatment difference in HbA1c mean (95% confidence interval) |
0.4 (0.0; 0.8) |
* Values are Mean ± SD. |
Another Insulin Lispro Product,
100 units/mL: Studies In Pediatric Patients 3 Years Of Age And Older
An 8-month, crossover study of
pediatric patients with type 1 diabetes (n=463), aged 9 to 19 years, compared
two subcutaneous multiple-dose treatment regimens: another insulin lispro
product, 100 units/mL, or regular human insulin, 100 units/mL, both
administered with NPH human insulin isophane suspension as the basal insulin.
Insulin lispro achieved glycemic control comparable to regular human insulin,
as measured by HbA1c (see Table 5).
Table 5: Type 1 Diabetes Mellitus - Pediatric Patients
9 Years of Age and Older - Mean Change in HbA1c (%) (another insulin lispro
product, 100 units/mL, versus regular human insulin, 100 units/mL)
|
Baseline |
Another Insulin Lispro Product + NPH |
Regular Human Insulin + NPH |
HbA1c (%)* |
8.6 ± 1.5 |
8.7 ± 1.5 |
8.7 ± 1.6 |
Change from baseline HbA1c (%)* |
- |
0.1 ± 1.1 |
0.1 ± 1.3 |
* Values are Mean ± SD. |
In a 9-month, crossover study
of pediatric patients with type 1 diabetes mellitus (n=60), aged 3 to 11 years,
compared three subcutaneous injection regimens: another insulin lispro product,
100 units/mL, administered immediately before meals, this same insulin lispro
product, 100 units/mL, administered immediately after meals and regular human
insulin, 100 units/mL administered 30 minutes before meals resulted in similar
glycemic control, as measured by HbA1c, regardless of treatment group.
Type 1 Diabetes Mellitus -
Continuous Subcutaneous Infusion
Another Insulin Lispro Product,
100 units/mL: Studies In Adult And Pediatric Patients 15 Years Of Age And Older
To evaluate the administration
of another insulin lispro product, 100 units/mL, as a subcutaneous infusion via
external insulin pumps, two open-label, crossover studies were performed in
patients with type 1 diabetes mellitus.
One study involved 39 patients,
ages 19 to 58 years, treated for 24 weeks with another insulin lispro product,
100 units/mL, or regular human insulin 100 units/mL. After 12 weeks of
treatment, the mean HbA1c values decreased from 7.8% to 7.2% in patients
treated with another insulin lispro, and from 7.8% to 7.5% in the regular human
insulin-treated patients.
Another study involved 60
patients (mean age 39, range 15 to 58 years) treated for 24 weeks with either
another insulin lispro product, 100 units/mL, or buffered regular human
insulin, 100 units/mL. After 12 weeks of treatment, the mean HbA1c values
decreased from 7.7% to 7.4% in patients treated with insulin lispro, and
remained unchanged from 7.7% in the buffered regular human insulin-treated
patients.
Another Insulin Lispro Product,
100 units/mL: Study In Pediatric Patients 4 Years Of Age And Older
A randomized, 16-week,
open-label, parallel design, study of pediatric patients with type 1 diabetes
mellitus (n=298), aged 4 to 18 years, compared two subcutaneous infusion
regimens administered via an external insulin pump: insulin aspart, 100
units/mL (n=198), or another insulin lispro product, 100 units/mL (n=100).
These two treatments resulted in comparable changes from baseline in HbA1c
after 16 weeks of treatment (see Table 6).
Table 6: Type 1 Diabetes Mellitus - Pediatric Patients
4 Years of Age and Older - Mean Change in HbA1c (%) (another insulin lispro
product, 100 units/mL, versus insulin aspart, 100 units/mL) in Insulin Pump
Study
Treatment duration |
16 Weeks |
Another Insulin Lispro Product |
Insulin Aspart |
N |
100 |
198 |
Baseline HbA1c (%)* |
8.2 ± 0.8 |
8.0 ± 0.9 |
Change from Baseline HbA1c (%) |
-0.1 ± 0.7 |
-0.1 ± 0.8 |
Treatment Difference in HbA1c, Mean (95% confidence interval) |
0.1 (-0.3, 0.1) |
* Values are Mean ± SD |
Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus
ADMELOG: Study In Adult Patients
A 26-week open-label,
active-controlled study (NCT02294474) evaluated the glucose lowering effect of
ADMELOG plus insulin glargine, 100 units/mL, compared to that of Comparator
(another insulin lispro product, 100 units/mL, or a non-U.S.-approved insulin
lispro, 100 units/mL) plus insulin glargine, 100 units/mL. A total of 505
patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus treated with insulin glargine, 100
units/mL, and rapid-acting mealtime insulin analogs participated in the study.
Patients were randomized to ADMELOG, 100 units/mL (n=253) or Comparator (n=252).
ADMELOG or Comparator, was administered by subcutaneous injection immediately
prior to meals.
The mean age of these subjects was 62.5 years, and 53.1%
were male. The population was 88.3% White, 6.1% Black or African American and
17.8% were Hispanic. The population had type 2 diabetes mellitus for a mean
duration of 17 years. The mean eGFR was 77.9 mL/min/1.73 m² and 26.9% of
patients had GFR >90 mL/min/1.73 m². The mean BMI was approximately 32.2
kg/m². At baseline, 51.4%, 48.2%, and 0.4% of the patients were using other
insulin lispro products, 100 units/mL, insulin aspart, 100 units/mL, or both,
respectively.
At week 26, treatment with
ADMELOG provided a mean reduction in HbA1c that was non-inferior to that
achieved with the Comparator (see Table 7).
Table 7: Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus - Adults - Mean
Change in HbA1c (%) (ADMELOG plus insulin glargine, 100 units/mL, versus
comparator plus insulin glargine, 100 units/mL)
Treatment Duration Treatment in Combination with: |
26 Weeks Insulin Glargine |
ADMELOG |
Comparator |
N* |
253 |
252 |
HbA1c (%) |
Baseline (mean) |
8.00 |
8.03 |
Adjusted mean change from baseline* |
-0.86 |
-0.80 |
Adjusted mean difference§ (95% CI) |
-0.06 (-0.209 to 0.091) |
* ITT: Intent-to-treat; all
randomized patients.
‡ Estimated using a multiple imputation method that models a
“return-to-baseline” for patients having missing data who discontinued
treatment. ANCOVA was used with treatment and stratification groups as fixed
factors and baseline HbA1c as a covariate.
§ Treatment difference: ADMELOG -Comparator |
Another Insulin Lispro Product,
100 units/mL: Study In Adult Patients
A 6-month randomized,
crossover, open-label, active-controlled study was conducted in 722 patients
with type 2 diabetes mellitus treated with insulin to assess the safety and
efficacy of another insulin lispro product, 100 units/mL, for 3 months followed
by regular human insulin, 100 units/mL, for 3 months or the reverse sequence.
This other insulin lispro product was administered by subcutaneous injection
immediately before meals and regular human insulin was administered 30 to 45
minutes before meals. NPH human insulin isophane suspension or human insulin
extended zinc suspension was administered once or twice daily as the basal
insulin. All patients participated in a 2 to 4-week run-in period with regular
human insulin and NPH human insulin isophane suspension or human insulin
extended zinc suspension.
Most of the patients were Caucasian (88%), and the
numbers of men and women in each group were approximately equal. The mean age
was 58.6 years (range 23.8 to 85 years). The average body mass index (BMI) was
28.2 kg/m². During the study, the majority of patients used NPH human insulin
isophane suspension (84%) compared with human insulin extended zinc suspension
(16%) as their basal insulin. The reductions from baseline in HbA1c were
similar between the two treatments from the combined groups (see Table 8).
Table 8: Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus - Adults - Mean
Change in HbA1c (%) (another insulin lispro product, 100 units/mL, versus
regular human insulin, 100 units/mL)
Treatment Duration |
Baseline |
3 Months |
Another Insulin Lispro Product + Basal |
Regular Human Insulin + Basal |
HbA1c (%)* |
8.9 ± 1.7 |
8.2 ± 1.3 |
8.2 ± 1.4 |
Change from baseline HbA1c (%)* |
- |
-0.7 ± 1.4 |
-0.7 ± 1.3 |
* Values are Mean ± SD. |