Clinical Pharmacology for Acova
Mechanism Of Action
Argatroban is a direct thrombin inhibitor that reversibly binds to the thrombin active site. Argatroban does not require the co-factor antithrombin III for antithrombotic activity. Argatroban exerts its anticoagulant effects by inhibiting thrombin-catalyzed or induced reactions, including fibrin formation; activation of coagulation factors V, VIII, and XIII; protein C; and platelet aggregation.
Argatroban is highly selective for thrombin with an inhibitory constant (Ki) of 0.04 μM. At therapeutic concentrations, argatroban has little or no effect on related serine proteases (trypsin, factor Xa, plasmin, and kallikrein).
Argatroban is capable of inhibiting the action of both free and clot-associated thrombin. Argatroban does not interact with heparin-induced antibodies. Evaluation of sera from 12 healthy subjects and 8 patients who received multiple doses of argatroban did not reveal antibody formation to argatroban (see Clinical Studies).
Pharmacokinetics
Distribution
Argatroban distributes mainly in the extracellular fluid as evidenced by an apparent steady state volume of distribution of 174 mL/kg (12.18L in a 70 kg adult). Argatroban is 54% bound to human serum proteins, with binding to albumin and α1-acid glycoprotein being 20% and 34% respectively.
Metabolism
The main route of argatroban metabolism is hydroxylation and aromatization of the 3-methyltetrahydroquinoline ring in the liver. The formation of each of the four known metabolites is catalyzed in vitro by the human liver microsomal cytochrome P450 enzymes CYP3A4/5. The primary metabolite (M1) exerts 3 to 5-fold weaker anticoagulant effects than argatroban. Unchanged argatroban is the major component in plasma. The plasma concentrations of M1 range between 0 – 20% of that of the parent drug. The other metabolites (M2 – 4) are found only in very low quantities in the urine and have not been detected in plasma or feces. These data, together with the lack of effect of erythromycin (a potent CYP3A4/5 inhibitor) on argatroban pharmacokinetics suggest that CYP3A4/5 mediated metabolism is not an important elimination pathway in vivo.
Total body clearance is approximately 5.1 mL/min/kg (0.31 L/hr/kg) for infusion doses up to 40 μg/kg/min. The terminal elimination half-life of argatroban ranges between 39 and 51 minutes.
There is no interconversion of the 21–(R): 21–(S) diastereoisomers. The plasma ratio of these diastereoisomers is unchanged by metabolism or hepatic impairment, remaining constant at 65:35 (±2%).
Excretion
Argatroban is excreted primarily in the feces, presumably through biliary secretion. In a study in which 14C-argatroban (5 μg/kg/min) was infused for 4 hours into healthy subjects, approximately 65% of the radioactivity was recovered in the feces within 6 days of the start of infusion with little or no radioactivity subsequently detected. Approximately 22% of the radioactivity appeared in the urine within 12 hours of the start of infusion. Little or no additional urinary radioactivity was subsequently detected. Average percent recovery of unchanged drug, relative to total dose, was 16% in urine and at least 14% in feces.
Pharmacokinetic/Pharmacodynamic Relationship
When ACOVA™ is administered by continuous infusion, anticoagulant effects and plasma concentrations of argatroban follow similar, predictable temporal response profiles, with low intersubject variability. Immediately upon initiation of ACOVA™ infusion, anticoagulant effects are produced as plasma argatroban concentrations begin to rise. Steady-state levels of both drug and anticoagulant effect are typically attained within 1-3 hours and are maintained until the infusion is discontinued or the dosage adjusted. Steady-state plasma argatroban concentrations increase proportionally with dose (for infusion doses up to 40 μg/kg/min in healthy subjects) and are well correlated with steady-state anticoagulant effects. For infusion doses up to 40 μg/kg/min, ACOVA™ increases in a dose-dependent fashion, the activated partial thromboplastin time (aPTT), the activated clotting time (ACT), the prothrombin time (PT) and International Normalized Ratio (INR), and the thrombin time (TT) in healthy volunteers and cardiac patients. Representative steady-state plasma argatroban concentrations and anticoagulant effects are shown below for ACOVA™ infusion doses up to 10 μg/kg/min (See Figure 2).
Figure 2: Relationship at Steady State between ACOVA™ Dose, Plasma Argatroban Concentration and Anticoagulant Effect
Effect On International Normalized Ratio (INR)
Because argatroban is a direct thrombin inhibitor, co-administration of ACOVA™ and warfarin produces a combined effect on the laboratory measurement of the INR. However, concurrent therapy, compared to warfarin monotherapy, exerts no additional effect on vitamin K dependent factor Xa activity.
The relationship between INR on co-therapy and warfarin alone is dependent on both the dose of ACOVA™ and the thromboplastin reagent used. This relationship is influenced by the International Sensitivity Index (ISI) of the thromboplastin. Data for two commonly utilized thromboplastins with ISI values of 0.88 (Innovin, Dade) and 1.78 (Thromboplastin C Plus, Dade) are presented in Figure 3 for an ACOVA™ dose of 2 μg/kg/min. Thromboplastins with higher ISI values than shown result in higher INRs on combined therapy of warfarin and ACOVA™. These data are based on results obtained in normal individuals (see DOSAGE AND ADMINISTRATION, Conversion to Oral Anticoagulant Therapy).
Figure 3 : INR Relationship of Argatroban plus Warfarin Versus Warfarin Alone
 |
Figure 3 demonstrates the relationship between INR for warfarin alone and INR for warfarin coadministered with argatroban at argatroban doses •2 μg/kg/min. To calculate INR for warfarin alone (INRW), based on INR for co-therapy of warfarin and argatroban (INRWA), use the equation next to the appropriate curve. Example: At a dose of 2 μg/kg/min and an INR performed with Thromboplastin A, the equation 0.19 + 0.57 (INRWA) = INRW would allow a prediction of the INR on warfarin alone (INRW). Thus, using an INRWA value of 4.0 obtained on combined therapy: INRW =0.19 +0.57 (4)=2.47 as the value for INR on warfarin alone. The error (confidence interval) associated with a prediction is ±0.4 units. Thus, for argatroban doses of 1 or 2 μg/kg/min, INRW can be predicted from INRWA. For argatroban doses greater than 2 μg/kg/min, the error associated with predicting INRW from INRWA is ±1. Thus, INRW cannot be reliably predicted from INRWA at doses greater than 2 μg/kg/min.
Special Populations
Renal Impairment
No dosage adjustment is necessary in patients with renal dysfunction. The effect of renal disease on the pharmacokinetics of argatroban was studied in 6 subjects with normal renal function (mean Clcr = 95 ± 16 mL/min) and in 18 subjects with mild (mean Clcr = 64 ± 10 mL/min), moderate (mean Clcr = 41 ± 5.8 mL/min), and severe (mean Clcr = 5 ± 7 mL/min) renal impairment. The pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of argatroban at dosages up to 5 μg/kg/min were not significantly affected by renal dysfunction.
Hepatic Impairment
The dosage of argatroban should be decreased in patients with hepatic impairment, (see DOSAGE AND ADMINISTRATION). Hepatic impairment is associated with decreased clearance and increased elimination half-life of argatroban (to 1.9 mL/min/kg and 181 minutes, respectively, for patients with a Child-Pugh score >6).
Age, Gender
There are no clinically significant effects of age or gender on the pharmacokinetics or pharmacodynamics (e.g., aPTT) of argatroban.
Drug-Drug Interactions
Digoxin
In 12 healthy volunteers, intravenous infusion of argatroban (2 μg/kg/min) over 5 hours daily for 5 days did not affect the steady-state pharmacokinetics of oral digoxin (0.375 mg daily for 15 days).
Erythromycin
In 10 healthy subjects, orally administered erythromycin (a potent inhibitor of CYP3A4/5) at 500 mg four times daily for 7 days had no effect on the pharmacokinetics of argatroban at a dose of 1 μg/kg/min for 5 hours. These data suggest oxidative metabolism by CYP3A4/5 is not an important elimination pathway in vivo for argatroban.
Clinical Studies
Heparin–induced thrombocytopenia (HIT) is a potentially serious, immune–mediated complication of heparin therapy that is strongly associated with subsequent venous and arterial thrombosis. Whereas initial treatment of HIT is to discontinue administration of all heparin, patients may require anticoagulation for prevention and treatment of thromboembolic events.
The conclusion that ACOVA™ is an effective treatment for heparin–induced thrombocytopenia (HIT) and heparin–induced thrombocytopenia and thrombosis syndrome (HITTS) is based upon the data from an historically controlled efficacy and safety study (Study 1) and a follow-on efficacy and safety study (Study 2). These studies were comparable with regard to study design, study objectives, dosing regimens as well as study outline, conduct and monitoring.
In these studies, 568 adult patients were treated with ACOVA™ and 193 adult patients made up the historical control group. Patients were required to have a clinical diagnosis of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia, either without thrombosis (HIT) or with thrombosis (HITTS) and be males or non-pregnant females between the age of 18 and 80 years old. HIT/HITTS was defined by a fall in platelet count to less than 100,000/μL or a 50% decrease in platelets after the initiation of heparin therapy with no apparent explanation other than HIT. Patients with HITTS also had presence of an arterial or venous thrombosis documented by appropriate imaging techniques or supported by clinical evidence such as acute myocardial infarction, stroke, pulmonary embolism, or other clinical indications of vascular occlusion. Patients who required anticoagulation with documented histories of positive HIT antibody test were also eligible in the absence of thrombocytopenia or heparin challenge (e.g., patients with latent disease).
Patients with documented unexplained aPTT >200% of control at baseline, documented coagulation disorder or bleeding diathesis unrelated to HITTS, a lumbar puncture within the past 7 days or a history of previous aneurysm, hemorrhagic stroke, or recent thrombotic stroke, within the past 6 months, unrelated to HITTS were excluded from these studies.
The initial dose of argatroban was 2 μg/kg/min not to exceed 10 μg/kg/min. Two hours after the start of the argatroban infusion, an aPTT level was obtained and dose adjustments were made to achieve a steady state aPTT value that was 1.5 to 3.0 times the baseline value, not to exceed 100 seconds. In Study 1, the mean aPTT level for HIT patients was 38 seconds prior to start of argatroban infusion. At first assessment*, during the argatroban infusion, mean aPTT level for HIT patients was 64 seconds. Overall, the mean aPTT level during the argatroban infusion for HIT patients was 62.5 seconds. In Study 1, the mean aPTT level for HITTS patients was 34 seconds prior to start of argatroban infusion. At first assessment*, during the argatroban infusion, mean aPTT level for HITTS patients was 70 seconds. Overall, the mean aPTT level during the argatroban infusion for HITTS patients was 64.5 seconds (see DOSAGE AND ADMINISTRATION). (*First assessment was defined as occurring at least two hours post-infusion start time.)
The primary efficacy analysis was based on a comparison of event rates for a composite endpoint that included death (all causes), amputation (all causes) or new thrombosis during the treatment and follow-up period (study days 0 to 37). Secondary analyses included evaluation of the event rates for the components of the composite endpoint as well as time-to-event analyses.
In Study 1, 304 patients were enrolled having active HIT (129/304, 42%), active HITTS (144/304, 47%) or latent disease (31/304, 10%). Among the 193 historical controls, 139 (72%) had active HIT, 46 (24%) had active HITTS, and 8 (4%) had latent disease. Within each group, those with active HIT and those with latent disease were analyzed together. Positive laboratory confirmation of HIT/HITTS by the heparin-induced platelet aggregation test or serotonin release assay was demonstrated in 174 of 304 (57%) argatroban-treated patients (i.e., in 80 with HIT or latent disease and 94 with HITTS) and in 149 of 193 (77%) historical controls (i.e., in 119 with HIT or latent disease and 30 with HITTS). The test results for the remainder of the patients and controls were either negative or not determined.
A categorical analysis showed a significant improvement in the composite outcome in patients with HIT and HITTS treated with ACOVA™versus those in the historical control group (see Table 1). The components of the composite endpoint are shown in Table 2.
Table 1 : Efficacy Results of Study 1: Composite Endpoint†
| Parameter, N (%) |
HIT |
HITTS |
HIT/HITTS |
Control
n=147 |
Argatroban
n=160 |
Control
n=46 |
Argatroban
n=144 |
Control
n=193 |
Argatroban
n=304 |
| Composite Endpoint |
57 (38.8) |
41(25.6) |
26 (56.5) |
63 (43.8) |
83 (43.0) |
104 (34.2) |
| † Death (all causes), amputation (all causes) or new thrombosis within 37-day study period. |
Table 2: Efficacy Results of Study 1: Components of the Composite Endpoint, Ranked by Severity†
| Parameter, N (%) |
HIT |
HITTS |
HIT/HITTS |
Control
n=147 |
Argatroban
n=160 |
Control
n = 46 |
Argatroban
n=144 |
Control
n=193 |
Argatroban
n = 304 |
| Death |
32 (21.8) |
27 (16.9) |
13 (28.3) |
26 (18.1) |
45 (23.3) |
53 (17.4) |
| Amputation |
3 (2.0) |
3 (1.9) |
4 (8.7) |
16 (11.1) |
7 (3.6) |
19 (6.2) |
| New Thrombosis |
22 (15.0) |
11 (6.9) |
9 (19.6) |
21 (14.6) |
31 (16.1) |
32 (10.5) |
| † Reported as the most severe outcome among the components of composite endpoint (severity ranking: death > amputation > new thrombosis); patients may have had multiple outcomes. |
Time-to-event analyses showed significant improvements in the time-to-first event in patients with HIT or HITTS treated with ACOVA™ versus those in the historical control group. The between-group differences in the proportion of patients who remained free of death, amputation or new thrombosis were statistically significant in favor of argatroban by these analyses (p=0.007 in patients with HIT and p=0.018 in patients with HITTS, as calculated by the log-rank test).
A time-to-event analysis for the composite endpoint is shown in Figure 4 for patients with HIT and Figure 5 for patients with HITTS.
Study 1
Figure 4: Time to First Event for the Composite Efficacy Endpoint: HIT Patients
*censored indicates no clinical endpoint (defined as death, amputation or new thrombosis) was observed during the follow-up period (maximum period of follow-up was 37 days).
Study 1
Figure 5: Time to First Event for the Composite EfficacyEndpoint: HITTS Patients
*censored indicates no clinical endpoint (defined as death, amputation or new thrombosis) was observed during the follow-up period (maximum period of follow-up was 37 days).
In Study 2, 264 patients were enrolled, having either HIT (125/264, 47.3%) or HITTS (139/264, 52.7%), and then treated with argatroban. Categorical analysis demonstrated significant improvement in the composite efficacy outcome for argatroban-treated patients, versus the same historical control group from Study 1, among patients having HIT (25.6% vs. 38.8%), patients having HITTS (41.0% vs. 56.5%), and patients having either HIT or HITTS (33.7% vs. 43.0%). Time-to-event analyses showed significant improvements in the time-to-first event in patients with HIT or HITTS treated with argatroban versus those in the historical control group. The between-group differences in the proportion of patients who remained free of death, amputation or new thrombosis were statistically significant in favor of argatroban.
Anticoagulant Effect
In Study 1, the mean (±SE) dose of argatroban administered was 2.0 ±0.1 μg/kg/min in the HIT arm and 1.9 ±0.1 μg/kg/min in the HITTS arm. Seventy-six percent of patients with HIT and 81% of patients with HITTS achieved a target aPTT at least 1.5 fold greater than the baseline aPTT at the first assessment occurring on average at 4.6 hours (HIT) and 3.9 hours (HITTS) following initiation of argatroban therapy.
No enhancement of aPTT response was observed in subjects receiving repeated administration of argatroban.
Platelet Count Recovery
In Study 1, the majority of patients, 53% of those with HIT and 58% of those with HITTS had a recovery of platelet count by day 3. Platelet Count Recovery was defined as an increase in platelet count to > 100,000/mL or to at least 1.5 fold greater than the baseline count (platelet count at study initiation) by day 3 of the study.
Additional Information
Cardiac Therapy
ACOVA™ has been administered in combination with aspirin to HIT patients undergoing coronary interventions including PTCA, coronary stent placement or atherectomy (n = 118). The safety and effectiveness of ACOVA™ for cardiac indications have not been established.
Reexposure And Lack Of Antibody Formation
Plasma from 12 healthy volunteers treated with argatroban over six days showed no evidence of neutralizing antibodies. Repeated administration of argatroban to more than 40 patients was tolerated with no loss of anticoagulant activity. No change in the dose is required.