CLINICAL PHARMACOLOGY
Mechanism Of Action
Following intravenous injection, gadofosveset binds
reversibly to endogenous serum albumin resulting in longer vascular residence
time than non-protein binding contrast agents. The binding to serum albumin also
increases the magnetic resonance relaxivity of gadofosveset and decreases the
relaxation time (T1) of water protons resulting in an increase in signal
intensity (brightness) of blood.
Pharmacodynamics
In human studies, gadofosveset substantially shortened
blood T1 values for up to 4 hours after intravenous bolus injection. Relaxivity
in plasma was measured to be 33.4 to 45.7 Mm-1 s-1 (0.47
T) over the dose range of up to 0.05 mmol/kg.
Pharmacokinetics
The pharmacokinetics of intravenously administered
gadofosveset conforms to a two-compartment open model with mean plasma
concentrations (reported as mean ±SD) of 0.43 ± 0.04 mmol/L at 3 minutes post-injection,
and 0.24 ± 0.03 mmol/L at one hour post-injection. The mean half-life of the
distribution phase is 0.48 ± 0.11 hours and the mean half-life of the
elimination phase is 16.3 ± 2.6 hours. The mean total clearance of gadofosveset
is 6.57 ± 0.97 mL/h/kg following the administration of 0.03 mmol/kg.
Distribution
The mean volume of distribution at steady state for
gadofosveset was 148 ± 16 mL/kg, roughly equivalent to that of extracellular
fluid. A significant portion of circulating gadofosveset is bound to plasma
proteins, predominantly albumin. At 0.05, 0.5, 1 and 4 hours after injection of
0.03 mmol/kg the plasma protein binding of gadofosveset ranges from 79.8 to
87.4.
Metabolism
Gadofosveset does not undergo measurable metabolism in
humans.
Excretion
Gadofosveset is eliminated primarily in the urine, with
between 79% and 94% (mean of 83.7%) of an injected dose recovered in the urine.
Of the total gadofosveset recovered in urine, 94% is recovered within the first
72 hours. A small portion of gadofosveset dose is recovered in feces (approximately
4.7%).
Special Populations
Renal Insufficiency: Administration of
gadolinium-based contrast agents, including ABLAVAR to patients with severe
renal insufficiency increases the risk for NSF. Administration of these agents
to patients with mild to moderate renal insufficiency may increase the risk for
worsened renal function [see WARNINGS AND PRECAUTIONS]. Prior to use of
ABLAVAR in these patients, ensure that no satisfactory diagnostic alternatives
are available. In patients with moderate to severe renal impairment (glomerular
filtration rate < 60 mL/kg/m²), administer ABLAVAR at a dose of 0.01 mmol/kg
to 0.02 mmol/kg. Consider follow-up renal function assessments following
ABLAVAR administration to any patients with renal insufficiency.
A clinical study of gadofosveset, at a dose of 0.05
mmol/kg, was conducted in patients with mild, moderate, and severe renal
impairment. The clearance decreased substantially as renal function decreased
and the systemic exposure (AUC) increased almost 1.75-fold in patients with
moderate (creatinine clearance: 30 to 50 mL/min) and 2.25-fold in patients with
severe renal impairment (creatinine clearance < 30 mL/min). The elimination
half-life increased from 19 hours in normal subjects to 49 hours in patients
with moderate and 70 hours in patients with severe renal impairment. The volume
of distribution at steady state and plasma protein binding of gadofosveset were
not affected by renal impairment. Fecal elimination of gadofosveset increased
as a function of increasing renal impairment (6.5% in normal subjects to 13.3%
in patients with severe renal impairment).
Hemodialysis: Gadofosveset is removed from the
body by hemodialysis using high-flux filters. Elimination of the total
administered dose of gadolinium in dialysate over 3 dialysis sessions using high-flux
filters averaged 46.8%, 12.9%, and 6.11% for the first, second, and third
sessions, respectively.
Hepatic Insufficiency: The pharmacokinetics and
plasma protein binding of gadofosveset was not significantly influenced by
moderate hepatic impairment. A slight decrease in fecal elimination of gadofosveset
was seen for the hepatic impaired subjects (2.7%) compared to normal subjects
(4.8%).
Gender: No dosage adjustment is necessary based on
gender. Gender had no meaningful effect on the pharmacokinetics of
gadofosveset.
Geriatric: No dosage adjustment is necessary based
on age. Age had no meaningful effect on the pharmacokinetics of gadofosveset.
Pediatric: Studies of gadofosveset in pediatric patients
have not been performed.
Clinical Studies
Safety and efficacy of ABLAVAR were assessed in two
multi-center, open-label, Phase 3 clinical trials. In both trials, patients
with known or suspected peripheral vascular disease underwent MRA with and
without ABLAVAR as well as catheter-based X-ray arteriography. Diagnostic
efficacy was based upon comparisons of sensitivity and specificity between MRA
with and without ABLAVAR, with X-ray arteriography as the reference standard.
Out of 493 patients enrolled in these two trials, 424
were included in the comparison of the diagnostic efficacy of ABLAVAR-MRA to
that of non-contrast MRA in detection/exclusion of occlusive vascular disease
( ≥ 50% stenosis) in 7 vessel-segments in the aortoiliac region. The
interpretation of MRA images from both trials was conducted by three
independent radiologist readers who were blinded to clinical data, including
the results of X-ray arteriography. In these 424 patients, the median age was
67 years with a range of 29 to 87 years; 58% of the patients were over 65 years
of age; 83% were white and 68% were male.
The primary efficacy analyses were designed to
demonstrate superiority in sensitivity and noninferiority in specificity of
ABLAVAR-MRA as compared to non-contrast MRA at the vessel-segment level. The
uninterpretable images were assigned an outcome of “wrong diagnosis”.
Additionally, success was also based upon acceptable performance
characteristics for the uninterpretable noncontrast MRA vessel segments that
became interpretable following ABLAVAR administration. Specifically, the
sensitivity and specificity for these ABLAVAR images were required to exceed
50%. These pre-specified success criteria were to be achieved by at least the
same two readers for all primary analyses.
Superiority in sensitivity and non-inferiority in
specificity was demonstrated for ABLAVAR-MRA by all three blinded readers. On
average, 316 vessel segments were assessed for sensitivity and 2230 for specificity,
by each reader. Table 4 summarizes the efficacy results, by reader.
Table 4: Performance Characteristics of Ablavar-MRA
and Non-contrast MRA
Reader |
SENSITIVITY |
SPECIFICITY |
Ablavar-MRA [A] |
Non-contrast MRA [B] |
[A] - [B] (95% CI)* |
Ablavar MRA [A] |
Noncontrast MRA [B] |
[A] - [B] (95% CI)* |
1 |
89% |
69% |
20% (15%, 25%) |
72% |
71% |
1% (-3%, 5%) |
2 |
82% |
70% |
12% (7%, 17%) |
81% |
73% |
8% (4%, 12%) |
3 |
79% |
64% |
15% (9%, 21%) |
85% |
85% |
0% (-2%, 2%) |
*(Based on cluster-corrected McNemar Test) |
Among the three readers, 5 to 12% of the vessel-segments
were deemed uninterpretable by non-contrast MRA. For these vessel segments,
sensitivity of ABLAVAR-MRA ranged from 72% [95% CI (54%, 90%)] to 97% [95% CI
(93%, 100%)] and specificity ranged from 72% [95% CI (67%,76%)] to 84% [95% CI
(81%, 88%)].