Selecting here opens the current stored cards. The pinned link below records their fingerprints. Do not enter patient information in links or searches.
Share or print this source review
1 local source card selected. Local card fingerprints checked where supplied. This is not an original-document hash, source-currency guarantee or clinical approval. Record-level cautions below are the current library's cautions, not a frozen prior version.
Copy is optional; the link can be selected and copied manually. No patient data or dose decision is collected.
Clinical context remains essential
Independent clinical review is pending. Confirm indication, exact formulation/route, population, renal measure and units, kidney-function stability, dialysis prescription, interacting drugs, monitoring and source revision. An RX mirror and its original label are not independent corroboration. Missing disagreement notes do not certify agreement.
eviQ protocol 171, lymphoma fractionated RICE; ifosfamide column only, not the Ewing sarcoma IE protocol.
Renal method
eGFR mL/min/1.73 m2.
Source revision
Source revision date not established in selected retrieval.
Retrieved
2026-09-07
Local review status
Selected source text imported locally; independent clinical review pending. Not a complete prescribing monograph.
Documented differences and cautions on this drug
All record notes are retained here, including notes about sources not selected in this review.
Ifosfamide kidney guidance differs between Ewing IE and lymphoma RICE
The two eviQ protocols treat severe kidney impairment differently: the Ewing regimen directs an alternative where the fractionated lymphoma regimen permits a reduction or alternative. The label itself supplies qualitative renal precautions, not these numeric bands.
What to reconcile: Match the malignancy, full chemotherapy protocol, intent, renal measurement and KRT. Different protocols from the same organization are not independent validation or interchangeable prescriptions.
Baseline kidney modification does not replace tubular-toxicity surveillance
Protocol-based baseline modifications coexist with the label warning about glomerular and tubular injury, including delayed effects. A baseline reduction is not proof that treatment-emergent injury is controlled.
What to reconcile: Review renal trends and tubular/electrolyte findings throughout and after treatment; consider the complete toxicity management instructions rather than continuing from a baseline table alone.
eviQ / Cancer Institute NSW · eviQ protocol 171, lymphoma fractionated RICE; ifosfamide column only, not the Ewing sarcoma IE protocol.
Renal method: eGFR mL/min/1.73 m2. Source date: Source revision date not established in selected retrieval. Retrieved: 2026-09-07
Dose or interval guidance. Use only the product, indication, renal metric and population described in this source.
Selected source text imported locally; independent clinical review pending. Not a complete prescribing monograph.
Renal dosing, restrictions and evidence limits
For this lymphoma protocol, use full-dose ifosfamide at eGFR at least 60 and 45-59, with increased adverse-event risk at 45-59. At both 30-44 and 15-29, reduce by 20% or use an alternative protocol, accounting for increased adverse-event risk. Below 15 without KRT, obtain multidisciplinary guidance; KRT also requires specialist collaboration. These are modifiers of the specified regimen, not stand-alone doses or permission to override another protocol.
This reference does not select a regimen. Complete the indication, measured/estimated renal function and trend, dialysis setting, source rationale, monitoring and reassessment plan in your institution's approved documentation system. Confirm the complete current source before adopting its regimen.
GlobalRPh v6.6 | RDM66-DIRECT-PHP-20260911 | Local library date 2026-09-11. Selected-card identity does not imply clinical verification.